正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The tremors are visible: • Junior analysts replaced by ChatGPT workflows • Midjourney creating full ad campaigns solo • GitHub Copilot managing entire codebases • Legal research done by AI in minutes, not hours This isn't the future. This is today.

532,979 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

32 条评论

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

By 2034, AI could handle 25-30% of current human tasks. Not the 80-90% some wildly predict. But enough to create significant shifts. Jobs won't vanish overnight. They'll evolve at different speeds across industries. Here's what's already happening:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Reid Hoffman isn't just another tech prophet. He: • Co-founded LinkedIn (sold for $26B to Microsoft) • Led early investments in Facebook, Airbnb, OpenAI • Predicted internet social shifts decades before they happened When he talks about the future, smart people listen.

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

By 2034, your 9-to-5 job will be extinct. That's Reid Hoffman's latest prediction. He built LinkedIn in 2002. He predicted social media in 1997. He was early in PayPal, Airbnb, and OpenAI. Here's what he says is coming next (& how to survive it):🧵

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

For 100 years, security meant a steady paycheck. Tomorrow? Security comes from skill fluidity. The ability to pivot faster than AI reshapes your industry. Most people aren't ready for this shift.

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

AI won't just change jobs. It'll change economics. Education gets personalized. Manufacturing grows more efficient. Healthcare becomes more accessible. But costs won't drop to zero like some predict. Physical reality still has limits.

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Think about what happened to music: MP3s killed CD distribution costs. Tower Records died. Spotify was born. But physical industries face different constraints: Manufacturing still needs materials. Healthcare needs human touch. The pattern varies by sector:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Survivors share three traits: • AI fluency — they use tools as force multipliers • Meta-skills — creativity, adaptability, emotional intelligence • Personal leverage — something AI can't replicate But here's where most people mess up...

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

They know AI matters. But they waste months testing random tools. Working without a strategy. Hoping something clicks. That's backwards thinking. Start with fundamentals, then add AI acceleration.

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

The same reason most people stall on X. They realize AI matters. They have the knowledge. But they lack the systems to stay consistent. That’s why I built Apex Agents:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

It lets you: • Set your unique voice, tone & style • Automate replies & interactions • Expand reach while staying 100% authentic Your brand grows. Your voice stays yours. 👉

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Kids born today likely won't "learn" AI like we do. They'll probably be AI native. Growing up with these tools as their default. They may outpace older workers not through intelligence, but by never knowing a world without AI assistance. Higher education faces pressure:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Why pay $200K for college when AI tutors deliver personalized education 24/7? Traditional universities won't disappear by 2034. But they'll face serious pressure to prove their value. The geopolitical stakes are even higher:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

AI supremacy is the new arms race. Chip export bans. Data sovereignty wars. National AI research labs. Your location may determine which tools you can access.

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Hoffman's blueprint: 1. Become an AI tool expert now 2. Build adaptability like muscle memory 3. Develop strong thinking and learning skills Remember: AI won't replace you. Someone who uses AI better will.

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

The 9-to-5 model is shifting. Not because robots are taking over everywhere. But because flexible work and AI are creating new possibilities. Some industries will change quickly. Others will adapt gradually. The key is recognizing where you stand:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

This isn't doom and gloom. It's the biggest opportunity in human history. Those who adapt early will thrive. Those who wait will struggle. Which side do you want to be on?

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

To help you build your brand 10x faster, I created Hook Hunter. I used to drown in content overwhelm, posting blindly with ZERO traction. Since then, I’ve studied 1000s of viral tweets on X. Try the tool I wish I had when I started today:

Jens Honack 的头像
Jens Honack1 年前

Thanks for reading! A bit about me: I write threads on AI and entrepreneurship, while crafting tools to help creators win the attention game on X. Follow @JensHonack for more & RT the first tweet to share it with others👇

Thomas 的头像
Thomas1 年前

Was sind GitHub lt diesem post

Jon Pequity 的头像
Jon Pequity1 年前

As long as ChatGPT continues to invent case law, lawyers should use AI very carefully when drafting a brief.

Steph Kimbrell 的头像
Steph Kimbrell1 年前

AI legal research is not reliable in my experience.

Finius 的头像
Finius1 年前

I’d love to see these fucking robots and AI replace good old-fashioned tradesmen. It’ll never fucking happen.

Imamazed aka Imam Azed 🔌🛸🍿 的头像
Imamazed aka Imam Azed 🔌🛸🍿1 年前

Copilot is worthless, it certainly can't manage any codebase

William Wintermute 的头像
William Wintermute1 年前

i cant hear anything, audio is non existent idk

sunflowerNC 的头像
sunflowerNC1 年前

Where’s the audio?

Bugs 的头像
Bugs1 年前

The legal research is certainly not flawless. In fact, two briefs in NJ were recently booted for containing AI accuracy. Proper and precise legal conclusions are far far away.

Shmoozer 的头像
Shmoozer1 年前

Well, if it is anything like the quality of legal research from every AI platform out there today, there should be no worries. It’s complete shit. Good for editing, terrible for accurate or precise research.

Greatest Failures 的头像
Greatest Failures1 年前

What happens when AI surpasses human intelligence to the point where the smartest person on the planet cannot understand how anything works? Then we become so reliant on AI that a fundamental failure or outage could be much more catastrophic than any similar event today

Gary Clarke 的头像
Gary Clarke1 年前

Stopped reading at GitHub Copilot

Gator Doc 的头像
Gator Doc1 年前

No sound

Julia 的头像
Julia1 年前

Legal research can NOT be done in minutes. AI shoots back fake cases and several lawyers have lost their jobs for relying on AI which gave bogus results.

James Figorski 的头像
James Figorski1 年前

Maybe if AI can stop providing false cases and false holdings and lawyers can stop being sanctioned for using it, it may do what you say.

相关视频