Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The video does not show an “unarmed Good Samaritan.” It shows a chaotic physical struggle where a man later found to be armed intervenes, is pepper-sprayed, goes to the ground, and is then actively wrestled as ICE agents move in to regain control. As the suspect stands up during...

TheBrancaShow's profile picture

Andrew Branca Show

178,606 subscribers

351,308 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaSağlık & İyilik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The video matters. In the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was actively resisting, multiple agents were attempting to compel compliance, and the suspect straightened up with a firearm in hand—that’s when the first shot is fired. The still frames showing a “bent elbow” appear after the initial shot, consistent with a waistband reach during a struggle. This wasn’t an “execution” or an ambush. It was a rapidly evolving use-of-force encounter involving a gun, loaded magazines, and active resistance. Media freeze-frames don’t override real-time dynamics. Under self-defense law, an armed suspect reaching during a struggle presents an imminent deadly threat—and officers are not required to wait to be shot.
1:56

The video matters. In the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was actively resisting, multiple agents were attempting to compel compliance, and the suspect straightened up with a firearm in hand—that’s when the first shot is fired. The still frames showing a “bent elbow” appear after the initial shot, consistent with a waistband reach during a struggle. This wasn’t an “execution” or an ambush. It was a rapidly evolving use-of-force encounter involving a gun, loaded magazines, and active resistance. Media freeze-frames don’t override real-time dynamics. Under self-defense law, an armed suspect reaching during a struggle presents an imminent deadly threat—and officers are not required to wait to be shot.

Andrew Branca Show

432,505 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The firearm matters—and the media is hiding it. At the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was armed with a SIG Sauer P320 AXG Combat, a high-capacity 9mm pistol with a threaded barrel, extended 20–21 round magazine, and a SIG Romeo optic—a setup costing $1,500–$2,000. This was not a cheap carry gun. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat. Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
5:08

The firearm matters—and the media is hiding it. At the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was armed with a SIG Sauer P320 AXG Combat, a high-capacity 9mm pistol with a threaded barrel, extended 20–21 round magazine, and a SIG Romeo optic—a setup costing $1,500–$2,000. This was not a cheap carry gun. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat. Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.

Andrew Branca Show

4,309,404 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The video is dispositive. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, the man later deemed the “victim” steps into an active enforcement scene, antagonizes a vehicle in the roadway, interferes with officers, is pepper-sprayed for impeding, falls to hands and knees, then rises with a firearm visibly in hand during a chaotic struggle. The moment the gun appears, shots are fired and officers instinctively move back. That’s textbook imminent deadly threat under self-defense law. This wasn’t an ambush or an execution—it was a rapidly evolving confrontation where an armed intervenor escalated the danger and officers responded lawfully. WATCH FULL SHOW:
3:54

The video is dispositive. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, the man later deemed the “victim” steps into an active enforcement scene, antagonizes a vehicle in the roadway, interferes with officers, is pepper-sprayed for impeding, falls to hands and knees, then rises with a firearm visibly in hand during a chaotic struggle. The moment the gun appears, shots are fired and officers instinctively move back. That’s textbook imminent deadly threat under self-defense law. This wasn’t an ambush or an execution—it was a rapidly evolving confrontation where an armed intervenor escalated the danger and officers responded lawfully. WATCH FULL SHOW:

Andrew Branca Show

89,700 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Ten shots isn’t the legal question. Imminence is. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, once officers reasonably perceived a firearm during an active struggle, deadly force was justified. The law accounts for human reaction time—both to start and to stop shooting. Officers don’t operate in freeze-frames. Multiple officers firing a few rounds each can reach double digits fast, and pistol rounds often don’t immediately stop a threat. As long as a gun is perceived and the threat isn’t clearly neutralized, continued fire is lawful. That’s not excess—it’s how self-defense law actually works in real time. WATCH FULL SHOW:
3:57

Ten shots isn’t the legal question. Imminence is. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, once officers reasonably perceived a firearm during an active struggle, deadly force was justified. The law accounts for human reaction time—both to start and to stop shooting. Officers don’t operate in freeze-frames. Multiple officers firing a few rounds each can reach double digits fast, and pistol rounds often don’t immediately stop a threat. As long as a gun is perceived and the threat isn’t clearly neutralized, continued fire is lawful. That’s not excess—it’s how self-defense law actually works in real time. WATCH FULL SHOW:

Andrew Branca Show

27,811 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The frame-by-frame matters. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, you can see an agent draw his service weapon before the first shot—right as the struggle peaks. The first round fires, there’s a brief pause, then multiple officers engage as the threat is perceived to escalate. That “popcorn” sound isn’t chaos; it’s coordinated response once a firearm is believed to be in play. Self-defense law doesn’t require officers to wait for a muzzle flash. When a weapon is perceived during active resistance, imminence is met. Freeze-frames after the fact don’t override real-time judgment in a deadly encounter. WATCH FULL SHOW:
2:10

The frame-by-frame matters. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, you can see an agent draw his service weapon before the first shot—right as the struggle peaks. The first round fires, there’s a brief pause, then multiple officers engage as the threat is perceived to escalate. That “popcorn” sound isn’t chaos; it’s coordinated response once a firearm is believed to be in play. Self-defense law doesn’t require officers to wait for a muzzle flash. When a weapon is perceived during active resistance, imminence is met. Freeze-frames after the fact don’t override real-time judgment in a deadly encounter. WATCH FULL SHOW:

Andrew Branca Show

19,114 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

WATCH🚨: Country’s top expert (Andrew Branca Show) self-defense law weighs in: Officers were wrestling an armed suspect when “GUN!” was yelled after one was spotted. Settled law lets officers rely on each other’s reasonable perceptions—no need for personal confirmation. Once a firearm shows up amid active resistance, the standard is clear: reasonable belief in imminent deadly force. It was met here. Freeze-frame critics ignore real-time chaos. The law doesn’t demand officers wait to get shot. Tragic? Yes. Lawful? Absolutely.
5:07

WATCH🚨: Country’s top expert (Andrew Branca Show) self-defense law weighs in: Officers were wrestling an armed suspect when “GUN!” was yelled after one was spotted. Settled law lets officers rely on each other’s reasonable perceptions—no need for personal confirmation. Once a firearm shows up amid active resistance, the standard is clear: reasonable belief in imminent deadly force. It was met here. Freeze-frame critics ignore real-time chaos. The law doesn’t demand officers wait to get shot. Tragic? Yes. Lawful? Absolutely.

Officer Lew

845,212 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.
0:46

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,231,346 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents shot a man in the leg as he ran into his own home… while a pregnant woman and children were inside, in Minneapolis. In the video, the family is heard calling the police for help, saying ICE agents followed the man for about 30 minutes. When he reached his home, he ran inside. An agent then opened fired toward the house, hitting him in the leg. Let’s be clear about what that means. Law enforcement is not allowed to use lethal force just because someone runs. Law enforcement is not allowed to fire toward an occupied home. Law enforcement is not allowed to seize someone inside their home without a judicial warrant, absent extremely narrow circumstances. This shot was fired in the direction of a house with children inside. This was not a split-second traffic stop. This was not an imminent threat to anyone inside that home. If families are calling the police because federal agents are firing toward their house, the question isn’t whether this is normal. The question is how much longer the government will keep violating the Constitution before someone else is killed.
1:42

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents shot a man in the leg as he ran into his own home… while a pregnant woman and children were inside, in Minneapolis. In the video, the family is heard calling the police for help, saying ICE agents followed the man for about 30 minutes. When he reached his home, he ran inside. An agent then opened fired toward the house, hitting him in the leg. Let’s be clear about what that means. Law enforcement is not allowed to use lethal force just because someone runs. Law enforcement is not allowed to fire toward an occupied home. Law enforcement is not allowed to seize someone inside their home without a judicial warrant, absent extremely narrow circumstances. This shot was fired in the direction of a house with children inside. This was not a split-second traffic stop. This was not an imminent threat to anyone inside that home. If families are calling the police because federal agents are firing toward their house, the question isn’t whether this is normal. The question is how much longer the government will keep violating the Constitution before someone else is killed.

Jesus Freakin Congress

604,445 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: In Portland, an ICE agent, driving a blue car with no license plate, is seen pulling up to a U.S. citizen, yelling, “get out of here, bitch,” pepper spraying them, and driving away. Pepper spray is a use of force. Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement may only use force that is objectively reasonable under the circumstances. If someone is standing and filming… not threatening anyone, and not interfering… pepper spraying them is not justified under that standard. So, let’s call this what this is… An armed federal agent drove up to a U.S. citizen, called them a “bitch,” sprayed them with a chemical weapon, and drove away. If an ordinary person did that, they’d be arrested for assault. The moment officers believe they can attack people for exercising their constitutional rights, without consequences, is the moment they stop enforcing the law.
0:29

🚨BREAKING: In Portland, an ICE agent, driving a blue car with no license plate, is seen pulling up to a U.S. citizen, yelling, “get out of here, bitch,” pepper spraying them, and driving away. Pepper spray is a use of force. Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement may only use force that is objectively reasonable under the circumstances. If someone is standing and filming… not threatening anyone, and not interfering… pepper spraying them is not justified under that standard. So, let’s call this what this is… An armed federal agent drove up to a U.S. citizen, called them a “bitch,” sprayed them with a chemical weapon, and drove away. If an ordinary person did that, they’d be arrested for assault. The moment officers believe they can attack people for exercising their constitutional rights, without consequences, is the moment they stop enforcing the law.

Jesus Freakin Congress

167,627 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Officers are supposed to be trained to use only the amount of force that is reasonably necessary to make an arrest or protect life — not to break people’s arms, shoot them, or kill them when there is no immediate threat. When a person is unarmed and not posing a clear danger, the law does not give officers a blank check to use extreme, injuring force; that kind of conduct can violate both department policy and the Constitution. In a situation like this, the focus should be on why de‑escalation and safer control techniques were not used, and why an arrest ended with a serious injury instead of a safe resolution.
1:38

Officers are supposed to be trained to use only the amount of force that is reasonably necessary to make an arrest or protect life — not to break people’s arms, shoot them, or kill them when there is no immediate threat. When a person is unarmed and not posing a clear danger, the law does not give officers a blank check to use extreme, injuring force; that kind of conduct can violate both department policy and the Constitution. In a situation like this, the focus should be on why de‑escalation and safer control techniques were not used, and why an arrest ended with a serious injury instead of a safe resolution.

Lee Merritt

14,059 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

A woman was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis during a federal enforcement operation, with sharply conflicting accounts emerging. DHS and the White House say the agent fired defensive shots after the woman attempted to use her car as a weapon while officers were blocked in snow. Minnesota officials say video footage shows the agent had room to move clear, was not struck by the vehicle as it drove off, and that the woman was not a target of immigration enforcement. The state says she was alone in the car and that a full investigation is under way to determine whether the use of lethal force was justified. Videos circulating on social media and broadcast by local media appear to show ICE agents arriving in a silver truck, ordering the woman to exit her vehicle and one agent tugging at the driver’s door. Footage shows shots fired within seconds as the vehicle begins to move away, before crashing into a parked car. The agent appears able to move clear and is not seen being struck by the vehicle. #Minneapolis
0:22

A woman was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis during a federal enforcement operation, with sharply conflicting accounts emerging. DHS and the White House say the agent fired defensive shots after the woman attempted to use her car as a weapon while officers were blocked in snow. Minnesota officials say video footage shows the agent had room to move clear, was not struck by the vehicle as it drove off, and that the woman was not a target of immigration enforcement. The state says she was alone in the car and that a full investigation is under way to determine whether the use of lethal force was justified. Videos circulating on social media and broadcast by local media appear to show ICE agents arriving in a silver truck, ordering the woman to exit her vehicle and one agent tugging at the driver’s door. Footage shows shots fired within seconds as the vehicle begins to move away, before crashing into a parked car. The agent appears able to move clear and is not seen being struck by the vehicle. #Minneapolis

BPI News

129,956 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨#BREAKING: Security footage just dropped out of Gastonia, NC after the DA announced NO CHARGES for the two White officers who shot and killed a Black man at a convenience store back in January. Liberals are furious because it turned out the gun the suspect pulled was completely fake. The suspect walked into the store, pulled what looked like a real handgun, and asked another customer "You trying to lose your life tonight?" Three separate times. An undercover detective inside the store fired and then a second officer outside fired as the suspect ran out with the gun still raised. The officers had no way of knowing the gun was a prop. Neither did the man he was threatening. The DA, Travis Page, declined to charge both of police officers in the shooting because: "The Constitution does not require police to gamble with their lives in the face of a serious threat of harm."
1:28

🚨#BREAKING: Security footage just dropped out of Gastonia, NC after the DA announced NO CHARGES for the two White officers who shot and killed a Black man at a convenience store back in January. Liberals are furious because it turned out the gun the suspect pulled was completely fake. The suspect walked into the store, pulled what looked like a real handgun, and asked another customer "You trying to lose your life tonight?" Three separate times. An undercover detective inside the store fired and then a second officer outside fired as the suspect ran out with the gun still raised. The officers had no way of knowing the gun was a prop. Neither did the man he was threatening. The DA, Travis Page, declined to charge both of police officers in the shooting because: "The Constitution does not require police to gamble with their lives in the face of a serious threat of harm."

Matt Van Swol

1,321,782 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨WHAT THE MEDIA WON’T SAY… BUT THE VIDEO DOES. Here’s what actually happened. A federal operation was underway. A volatile scene. Uniformed agents. Crowds forming. An individual INSERTED himself into that operation. He was armed earlier. He physically resisted. He engaged in a hands-on struggle with federal agents. At that moment, agents DO NOT KNOW: If there is a second firearm. If there is a blade. If there is a staged weapon nearby. If there is an accomplice closing distance. That is how real-world use of force works. The media stripped ALL of that context. They froze one frame. They erased resistance. They pretended removing one weapon magically ends a lethal threat. It doesn’t. In a live fight, the threat persists until the suspect is fully secured and searched. Period. Calling this “execution” is propaganda. Calling agents “aggressors” is narrative laundering. Calling resistance “helping” is deliberate deception. This is how trust in law enforcement is destroyed… And chaos is justified. Watch the video. Ignore the spin. Reality doesn’t bend for headlines. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
2:05

🚨WHAT THE MEDIA WON’T SAY… BUT THE VIDEO DOES. Here’s what actually happened. A federal operation was underway. A volatile scene. Uniformed agents. Crowds forming. An individual INSERTED himself into that operation. He was armed earlier. He physically resisted. He engaged in a hands-on struggle with federal agents. At that moment, agents DO NOT KNOW: If there is a second firearm. If there is a blade. If there is a staged weapon nearby. If there is an accomplice closing distance. That is how real-world use of force works. The media stripped ALL of that context. They froze one frame. They erased resistance. They pretended removing one weapon magically ends a lethal threat. It doesn’t. In a live fight, the threat persists until the suspect is fully secured and searched. Period. Calling this “execution” is propaganda. Calling agents “aggressors” is narrative laundering. Calling resistance “helping” is deliberate deception. This is how trust in law enforcement is destroyed… And chaos is justified. Watch the video. Ignore the spin. Reality doesn’t bend for headlines. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

392,686 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This Saturday, July 1, a law goes into effect that allows permitless carry of concealed weapons in FL. Get the facts. The new law does not change who can own a gun or where you can carry a firearm. Permitless carry is NOT open carry. Be informed, and be a responsible gun owner.
1:29

This Saturday, July 1, a law goes into effect that allows permitless carry of concealed weapons in FL. Get the facts. The new law does not change who can own a gun or where you can carry a firearm. Permitless carry is NOT open carry. Be informed, and be a responsible gun owner.

Orange County Sheriff's Office

52,983 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent pulled a gun on an unarmed man, who was running AWAY from him… into an apartment complex… in Austin, Texas. This morning agents tried to stop two men, who then ran. In the video, an agent couldn’t catch one man, so he pulls his gun and points it at another unarmed man, while chasing him through a residential area. That is not normal. Pointing a firearm at someone is a use of force. And courts have been very clear… you don’t get to threaten lethal force just because someone ran from you. Running is not an imminent deadly threat. And this wasn’t an empty field. This was an apartment complex… where innocent people, including children, could have been in the line of fire because an agent decided to escalate a nonviolent situation. The agent then tells the man to get on the ground, which he does… and as the man is lying there unarmed, complying, the agent still has his gun pointed at him. Only after another agent says, “I got it, I got it,” does he finally holster his weapon. So, let’s be honest about what we’re watching… This is what poorly trained agents look like when they believe there are no consequences. This is what happens when escalation is normalized, and drawing a weapon becomes instinct instead of a last resort. An agent couldn’t catch someone… so he pulled a gun. A pattern we keep seeing. And every time it starts the same way, someone running away. Running away is not a capital offense. It does not justify threatening lethal force in a residential area, full of families. It does not justify pointing a firearm at an unarmed person, especially when on the ground. When agents feel empowered to escalate situations like this, it signals something bigger than one incident... It signals a culture that believes badges override constitutional rights. Threatening deadly force, when there is no immediate threat, is illegal. And it has to stop. Because the next time an agent “can’t catch” someone, we already know how the story can end.
1:48

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent pulled a gun on an unarmed man, who was running AWAY from him… into an apartment complex… in Austin, Texas. This morning agents tried to stop two men, who then ran. In the video, an agent couldn’t catch one man, so he pulls his gun and points it at another unarmed man, while chasing him through a residential area. That is not normal. Pointing a firearm at someone is a use of force. And courts have been very clear… you don’t get to threaten lethal force just because someone ran from you. Running is not an imminent deadly threat. And this wasn’t an empty field. This was an apartment complex… where innocent people, including children, could have been in the line of fire because an agent decided to escalate a nonviolent situation. The agent then tells the man to get on the ground, which he does… and as the man is lying there unarmed, complying, the agent still has his gun pointed at him. Only after another agent says, “I got it, I got it,” does he finally holster his weapon. So, let’s be honest about what we’re watching… This is what poorly trained agents look like when they believe there are no consequences. This is what happens when escalation is normalized, and drawing a weapon becomes instinct instead of a last resort. An agent couldn’t catch someone… so he pulled a gun. A pattern we keep seeing. And every time it starts the same way, someone running away. Running away is not a capital offense. It does not justify threatening lethal force in a residential area, full of families. It does not justify pointing a firearm at an unarmed person, especially when on the ground. When agents feel empowered to escalate situations like this, it signals something bigger than one incident... It signals a culture that believes badges override constitutional rights. Threatening deadly force, when there is no immediate threat, is illegal. And it has to stop. Because the next time an agent “can’t catch” someone, we already know how the story can end.

Jesus Freakin Congress

46,889 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: In Everett, MA, an ICE agent appears to drop their firearm, while multiple agents are on top of a man…then another agent falsely claims the man was grabbing the gun. In the video, as the gun falls to the ground, and is tossed away from the pile of agents, another agent can be heard yelling, “He grabbed your gun. He grabbed your gun.” Except… the video appears to show the exact opposite. The firearm wasn’t in the man’s hands. It had already been thrown away from the struggle. This is exactly why poorly trained agents are so dangerous. The second someone yells, “He’s got the gun,” every officer on the scene has to make a split-second decision, based on that information. If that information is wrong, you’ve just created a situation where someone could be shot because another agent panicked, or falsely identified what happened. We’ve seen this before with Alex Pretti. Federal agents carrying firearms should be trained well enough not to lose control of their weapon… and certainly not to falsely claim the person they’re arresting has it. We’ve now seen multiple videos of agents dropping magazines, firearms, and handling their weapons in ways that raise serious safety concerns. Every time DHS puts poorly trained agents on the street, with the unlimited power to detain people and carry loaded firearms, they are putting the public, bystanders, and even their own agents at risk. And until there is real accountability for reckless conduct, and inadequate training, these dangerous incidents will keep happening. The public shouldn’t have to wonder whether the biggest threat during an arrest is the person being detained… or the agent carrying the gun.
2:39

🚨BREAKING: In Everett, MA, an ICE agent appears to drop their firearm, while multiple agents are on top of a man…then another agent falsely claims the man was grabbing the gun. In the video, as the gun falls to the ground, and is tossed away from the pile of agents, another agent can be heard yelling, “He grabbed your gun. He grabbed your gun.” Except… the video appears to show the exact opposite. The firearm wasn’t in the man’s hands. It had already been thrown away from the struggle. This is exactly why poorly trained agents are so dangerous. The second someone yells, “He’s got the gun,” every officer on the scene has to make a split-second decision, based on that information. If that information is wrong, you’ve just created a situation where someone could be shot because another agent panicked, or falsely identified what happened. We’ve seen this before with Alex Pretti. Federal agents carrying firearms should be trained well enough not to lose control of their weapon… and certainly not to falsely claim the person they’re arresting has it. We’ve now seen multiple videos of agents dropping magazines, firearms, and handling their weapons in ways that raise serious safety concerns. Every time DHS puts poorly trained agents on the street, with the unlimited power to detain people and carry loaded firearms, they are putting the public, bystanders, and even their own agents at risk. And until there is real accountability for reckless conduct, and inadequate training, these dangerous incidents will keep happening. The public shouldn’t have to wonder whether the biggest threat during an arrest is the person being detained… or the agent carrying the gun.

Jesus Freakin Congress

100,927 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught, on video, recklessly pointing their GUNS at a CHILD, and multiple other unarmed U.S. citizens… who were nowhere near them… while demanding a legal resident prove his immigration status, in Immokalee, Florida. And this all happened in a busy gas station parking lot… In the video, a person is recording while walking toward the sidewalk… When suddenly, an ICE agent draws his firearm, turns around, and points his gun directly at the unarmed U.S. citizen. And just to be clear… No one was attacking him, rushing toward him, or even armed with any sort of weapon. In fact, no one was even close enough to pose an immediate physical threat. Then, the agent, with his gun still drawn, orders a car to move. As it backs up, he recklessly sweeps his loaded firearm across multiple unarmed people… including a MINOR… who are standing on a public sidewalk, legally record from a distance. The person filming keeps asking… “What’s the threat?” Because the video clearly doesn’t show one. Moments later, the same agent points his gun at the person filming, AGAIN. Then, a shirtless man walks around the vehicle to see what’s happening, and the agent immediately points the gun at him, too. At this point, a second ICE agent is seen, standing on the side of the car, with HIS gun drawn, too. And after all of that… The man, they were demanding papers from, walks away because he wasn’t undocumented. And the ICE agents get into their car and leave. Federal officers are trained to draw their firearms only when they reasonably believe there is an imminent threat of death, or serious bodily harm. Every time a loaded firearm is pointed at someone, there is a risk of a tragic mistake… especially in a public place where innocent bystanders could be caught in the middle. And once again… recording federal agents, from a public place, is protected by the First Amendment, so long as you are not interfering with their duties. And no one was interfering… or even near them. So, what exactly justified having multiple firearms drawn, and pointed at unarmed people, in a crowded gas station parking lot? This wasn’t just dangerous for the people filming… It was dangerous for everyone in that parking lot. And this video is just another example of what happens when poorly trained ICE agents aren’t held accountable.
2:42

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught, on video, recklessly pointing their GUNS at a CHILD, and multiple other unarmed U.S. citizens… who were nowhere near them… while demanding a legal resident prove his immigration status, in Immokalee, Florida. And this all happened in a busy gas station parking lot… In the video, a person is recording while walking toward the sidewalk… When suddenly, an ICE agent draws his firearm, turns around, and points his gun directly at the unarmed U.S. citizen. And just to be clear… No one was attacking him, rushing toward him, or even armed with any sort of weapon. In fact, no one was even close enough to pose an immediate physical threat. Then, the agent, with his gun still drawn, orders a car to move. As it backs up, he recklessly sweeps his loaded firearm across multiple unarmed people… including a MINOR… who are standing on a public sidewalk, legally record from a distance. The person filming keeps asking… “What’s the threat?” Because the video clearly doesn’t show one. Moments later, the same agent points his gun at the person filming, AGAIN. Then, a shirtless man walks around the vehicle to see what’s happening, and the agent immediately points the gun at him, too. At this point, a second ICE agent is seen, standing on the side of the car, with HIS gun drawn, too. And after all of that… The man, they were demanding papers from, walks away because he wasn’t undocumented. And the ICE agents get into their car and leave. Federal officers are trained to draw their firearms only when they reasonably believe there is an imminent threat of death, or serious bodily harm. Every time a loaded firearm is pointed at someone, there is a risk of a tragic mistake… especially in a public place where innocent bystanders could be caught in the middle. And once again… recording federal agents, from a public place, is protected by the First Amendment, so long as you are not interfering with their duties. And no one was interfering… or even near them. So, what exactly justified having multiple firearms drawn, and pointed at unarmed people, in a crowded gas station parking lot? This wasn’t just dangerous for the people filming… It was dangerous for everyone in that parking lot. And this video is just another example of what happens when poorly trained ICE agents aren’t held accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

36,451 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video trying to ram into a U.S. citizen’s car. In the video, U.S. citizens are driving down the road when an ICE vehicle, traveling in the opposite direction, crosses toward their lane and drives directly at their vehicle. The ICE vehicle pulls a U-turn and begins following the U.S. citizen’s vehicle. Seconds later, another ICE vehicle pulls alongside the car, creating a situation where ICE agents appear to be surrounding and pressuring the American citizens. This is not just alarming… it is dangerous. A government vehicle is not a weapon. Federal agents do not get to use their vehicles to intimidate, pursue, or restrict someone’s movement without legal justification. This is what happens when law enforcement agencies believe they have unlimited power. Federal agents are still bound by the law… and Americans have a right to demand accountability when those laws are ignored.
0:22

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video trying to ram into a U.S. citizen’s car. In the video, U.S. citizens are driving down the road when an ICE vehicle, traveling in the opposite direction, crosses toward their lane and drives directly at their vehicle. The ICE vehicle pulls a U-turn and begins following the U.S. citizen’s vehicle. Seconds later, another ICE vehicle pulls alongside the car, creating a situation where ICE agents appear to be surrounding and pressuring the American citizens. This is not just alarming… it is dangerous. A government vehicle is not a weapon. Federal agents do not get to use their vehicles to intimidate, pursue, or restrict someone’s movement without legal justification. This is what happens when law enforcement agencies believe they have unlimited power. Federal agents are still bound by the law… and Americans have a right to demand accountability when those laws are ignored.

Jesus Freakin Congress

24,534 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

What we know. He was resisting law enforcement. They were trying to pin him down. Officers started to scatter at the time a shot was fired. This was followed by a flurry of gun fire. The suspect had a gun on him with an extra magazine and is now dead.
2:32

What we know. He was resisting law enforcement. They were trying to pin him down. Officers started to scatter at the time a shot was fired. This was followed by a flurry of gun fire. The suspect had a gun on him with an extra magazine and is now dead.

Jeffery Mead

1,329,697 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents surround a man who is already on his knees on the pavement, with his hands raised, while agents stand over him and verify his citizenship. This alone is a serious constitutional violation. ICE does not have authority to detain U.S. citizens to check their immigration status. They also do not need someone on their knees to “verify” citizenship. And forcing someone into a compliance position on the ground without probable cause constitutes an unlawful detention under the Fourth Amendment. After agents confirm he is a U.S. citizen, the man stands up and begins yelling… visibly angry and shaken. The man is yelling at agents for swarming his car at gun point, a U.S. citizen, and forcing him out. Saying, “I could’ve died.” ICE agents then try to claim it was because of his registration. A line they often use, that still doesn’t justify their actions. What this video shows is federal agents detaining first, forcing compliance, then checking legality afterward… the opposite of how policing in a constitutional system is supposed to work. If ICE can force a U.S. citizen to the ground over a car they happen to be driving, citizenship no longer protects you. This isn’t a minor mistake. It’s a clear abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and every American should be outraged.
0:57

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents surround a man who is already on his knees on the pavement, with his hands raised, while agents stand over him and verify his citizenship. This alone is a serious constitutional violation. ICE does not have authority to detain U.S. citizens to check their immigration status. They also do not need someone on their knees to “verify” citizenship. And forcing someone into a compliance position on the ground without probable cause constitutes an unlawful detention under the Fourth Amendment. After agents confirm he is a U.S. citizen, the man stands up and begins yelling… visibly angry and shaken. The man is yelling at agents for swarming his car at gun point, a U.S. citizen, and forcing him out. Saying, “I could’ve died.” ICE agents then try to claim it was because of his registration. A line they often use, that still doesn’t justify their actions. What this video shows is federal agents detaining first, forcing compliance, then checking legality afterward… the opposite of how policing in a constitutional system is supposed to work. If ICE can force a U.S. citizen to the ground over a car they happen to be driving, citizenship no longer protects you. This isn’t a minor mistake. It’s a clear abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and every American should be outraged.

Jesus Freakin Congress

722,343 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce