Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An...

TheJFreakinC's profile picture

Jesus Freakin Congress

59,018 subscribers

1,231,873 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨ICE and Border Patrol agents are once again threatening U.S. citizens for exercising their constitutional rights… this time in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, agents swarm a car belonging to a U.S. citizen who is doing nothing more than observing them… which is a protected First Amendment right. Instead of respecting the Constitution, they start barking threats: “This is your one and only warning to quit obstructing us.” The driver calmly responds, “I’m not obstructing you.” Then one agent delivers the line that sums up the whole problem: “This is your one warning, you will be arrested for impeding.” They’re not being impeded. They’re being watched…. and they don’t like that the public is finally paying attention. This is what happens when agencies with a long record of abuse realize people know their rights: they lash out, they threaten, and they try to intimidate citizens into silence. But, observing law enforcement is not a crime. Threatening Americans for doing it absolutely is.
0:27

🚨ICE and Border Patrol agents are once again threatening U.S. citizens for exercising their constitutional rights… this time in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, agents swarm a car belonging to a U.S. citizen who is doing nothing more than observing them… which is a protected First Amendment right. Instead of respecting the Constitution, they start barking threats: “This is your one and only warning to quit obstructing us.” The driver calmly responds, “I’m not obstructing you.” Then one agent delivers the line that sums up the whole problem: “This is your one warning, you will be arrested for impeding.” They’re not being impeded. They’re being watched…. and they don’t like that the public is finally paying attention. This is what happens when agencies with a long record of abuse realize people know their rights: they lash out, they threaten, and they try to intimidate citizens into silence. But, observing law enforcement is not a crime. Threatening Americans for doing it absolutely is.

Jesus Freakin Congress

160,321 views • 8 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just threatened to shoot a U.S. citizen for exercising his First Amendment right to observe and film ICE activities… and it was all caught on camera. In the video, agents come up to a man’s car after stopping in front and behind him, aggressively pounding on his window and yelling: “This is your warning… stop fucking following us. You are impeding operations.” The man says, “This is my house. I’ve got to get to my house.” The agent then tells him, “This is your warning… go home to your kids.” Which is a chilling thing to say when a U.S. citizen is literally driving through his own neighborhood… and being told he isn’t allowed to do so. Then the camera pans to the other window, where another agent stands with his gun drawn. Not holstered. Gun in hand. The man rolls down his window and calmly says, “You should go to church.” The agent replies, “You’re making bad decisions.” Bad decisions… like driving in your own neighborhood? Filming? Breathing? And then the original agent comes back to the car yelling: “You are not going to like the outcome. I guarantee that.” They’re not being vague. They’re not cautioning him. What they mean by “the outcome” is spelled out seconds later: “Go home to your children. It’s Sunday. Did you not learn from what just happened?” This is a threat. This is intimidation. This is armed government agents using lethal force as a warning against constitutional rights. They are telling the public that anyone who observes them, anyone who films them, anyone who doesn’t immediately disappear, can expect the same outcome as Renee Good. And that is exactly how we know the government does not believe that shooting was self-defense. Because you don’t use “self‑defense” as a warning to people who haven’t done anything wrong.
1:49

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just threatened to shoot a U.S. citizen for exercising his First Amendment right to observe and film ICE activities… and it was all caught on camera. In the video, agents come up to a man’s car after stopping in front and behind him, aggressively pounding on his window and yelling: “This is your warning… stop fucking following us. You are impeding operations.” The man says, “This is my house. I’ve got to get to my house.” The agent then tells him, “This is your warning… go home to your kids.” Which is a chilling thing to say when a U.S. citizen is literally driving through his own neighborhood… and being told he isn’t allowed to do so. Then the camera pans to the other window, where another agent stands with his gun drawn. Not holstered. Gun in hand. The man rolls down his window and calmly says, “You should go to church.” The agent replies, “You’re making bad decisions.” Bad decisions… like driving in your own neighborhood? Filming? Breathing? And then the original agent comes back to the car yelling: “You are not going to like the outcome. I guarantee that.” They’re not being vague. They’re not cautioning him. What they mean by “the outcome” is spelled out seconds later: “Go home to your children. It’s Sunday. Did you not learn from what just happened?” This is a threat. This is intimidation. This is armed government agents using lethal force as a warning against constitutional rights. They are telling the public that anyone who observes them, anyone who films them, anyone who doesn’t immediately disappear, can expect the same outcome as Renee Good. And that is exactly how we know the government does not believe that shooting was self-defense. Because you don’t use “self‑defense” as a warning to people who haven’t done anything wrong.

Jesus Freakin Congress

681,132 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are threatening to tase U.S. citizens just for asking them to identify themselves, in Arizona. At the very start of this video, ICE agents are caught actively interfering with a citizen’s First Amendment rights. Before a single word is exchanged, two agents point their flashlights directly at the man filming, aimed straight at his camera, not at the ground, not at an area search, but to obstruct his ability to record them. The man asks a simple, lawful question: “What are you guys doing here?” The response from armed federal agents is not identification or explanation, but: “Don’t worry about it. Get out of here.” He then asks, “Who are you guys?” Again, the agents refuse to identify themselves and repeat: “Get out of here.” All while keeping their flashlights raised at face level, pointed directly into the camera lens. He asks a third time, calmly: “Who are you guys?” An agent responds: “That’s none of your business.” That statement is legally false. When armed officers are exercising government authority in a public place, the public has the right to observe, record, and ask questions. Refusing to identify themselves while issuing commands is not standard procedure… it is a deliberate attempt to evade accountability. The man replies, correctly: “That is my business. Who are you guys?” At that point, an agent escalates… not because of interference, not because of a safety threat, but because he continues filming and asking lawful questions. The agent says: “Sir, if you don’t leave, you’re going to be tased.” That is not a lawful order. Threatening the use of force solely to stop someone from filming or asking who officers are is retaliation for protected speech. Courts have been clear: law enforcement may not use threats, intimidation, or force to suppress First Amendment activity. He asks again: “Who are you guys?” The agent’s final response: “Don’t worry about it.” No identification. No legal justification. Only intimidation. Pointing flashlights to blind a camera, issuing repeated orders to “get out of here” without a lawful basis, and threatening a taser to silence a citizen is not law enforcement… it is constitutional abuse of power. This is exactly why people film. And exactly why some officers try so hard to stop it.
0:41

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are threatening to tase U.S. citizens just for asking them to identify themselves, in Arizona. At the very start of this video, ICE agents are caught actively interfering with a citizen’s First Amendment rights. Before a single word is exchanged, two agents point their flashlights directly at the man filming, aimed straight at his camera, not at the ground, not at an area search, but to obstruct his ability to record them. The man asks a simple, lawful question: “What are you guys doing here?” The response from armed federal agents is not identification or explanation, but: “Don’t worry about it. Get out of here.” He then asks, “Who are you guys?” Again, the agents refuse to identify themselves and repeat: “Get out of here.” All while keeping their flashlights raised at face level, pointed directly into the camera lens. He asks a third time, calmly: “Who are you guys?” An agent responds: “That’s none of your business.” That statement is legally false. When armed officers are exercising government authority in a public place, the public has the right to observe, record, and ask questions. Refusing to identify themselves while issuing commands is not standard procedure… it is a deliberate attempt to evade accountability. The man replies, correctly: “That is my business. Who are you guys?” At that point, an agent escalates… not because of interference, not because of a safety threat, but because he continues filming and asking lawful questions. The agent says: “Sir, if you don’t leave, you’re going to be tased.” That is not a lawful order. Threatening the use of force solely to stop someone from filming or asking who officers are is retaliation for protected speech. Courts have been clear: law enforcement may not use threats, intimidation, or force to suppress First Amendment activity. He asks again: “Who are you guys?” The agent’s final response: “Don’t worry about it.” No identification. No legal justification. Only intimidation. Pointing flashlights to blind a camera, issuing repeated orders to “get out of here” without a lawful basis, and threatening a taser to silence a citizen is not law enforcement… it is constitutional abuse of power. This is exactly why people film. And exactly why some officers try so hard to stop it.

Jesus Freakin Congress

57,100 views • 8 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now threatening to violently assault U.S. citizens for the crime of sitting in their own car, in a parking lot… Yes. Literally that. ICE agents are now claiming U.S. citizens are not allowed to be in the same parking lot as them. In the video, you can hear an agent approach a person sitting quietly in their car and announce that he is ICE, and that other ICE agents are also in the parking lot… Then the agent immediately issues what he calls his “one and only warning.” The person responds, “I was just on the phone.” The agent responds, “No. No you’re not.” The agent then escalates to a direct threat of violence, saying… “This is your one and only warning. I catch you here again, I’m yanking you out of that fucking car because you’re taking pictures on your little GoPro.” So, to be clear… a U.S. citizen is being threatened with assault not for impeding, not for interfering, not for committing any crime… …but for having a dash cam. The agent then adds, “If anything happens to our vehicles, or anybody in here, I’m coming straight for you.” Then more threats… “I will yank you out of that fucking car, and I will fucking put charges on you.” Charges for what? He never says. Because there are none. And then he admits the quiet part out loud… “I’ll put you in the fucking domestic terrorists app.” A federal agent threatening to label a U.S. citizen a “domestic terrorist” for sitting in a car while having a dash cam. And then the agent illegally orders the U.S. citizen to “get the fuck out” of the parking lot and tells him he is not allowed to return. To break that all down… an ICE agent used intimidation, retaliation, and threats of violence against a U.S. citizen for exercising their First Amendment rights, and existing in a public space. And then banned the U.S. citizen from returning to the public space. So, just to be absolutely clear… The Trump administration is conditioning the public to obey masked federal agents, without questions and without rights.
0:42

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now threatening to violently assault U.S. citizens for the crime of sitting in their own car, in a parking lot… Yes. Literally that. ICE agents are now claiming U.S. citizens are not allowed to be in the same parking lot as them. In the video, you can hear an agent approach a person sitting quietly in their car and announce that he is ICE, and that other ICE agents are also in the parking lot… Then the agent immediately issues what he calls his “one and only warning.” The person responds, “I was just on the phone.” The agent responds, “No. No you’re not.” The agent then escalates to a direct threat of violence, saying… “This is your one and only warning. I catch you here again, I’m yanking you out of that fucking car because you’re taking pictures on your little GoPro.” So, to be clear… a U.S. citizen is being threatened with assault not for impeding, not for interfering, not for committing any crime… …but for having a dash cam. The agent then adds, “If anything happens to our vehicles, or anybody in here, I’m coming straight for you.” Then more threats… “I will yank you out of that fucking car, and I will fucking put charges on you.” Charges for what? He never says. Because there are none. And then he admits the quiet part out loud… “I’ll put you in the fucking domestic terrorists app.” A federal agent threatening to label a U.S. citizen a “domestic terrorist” for sitting in a car while having a dash cam. And then the agent illegally orders the U.S. citizen to “get the fuck out” of the parking lot and tells him he is not allowed to return. To break that all down… an ICE agent used intimidation, retaliation, and threats of violence against a U.S. citizen for exercising their First Amendment rights, and existing in a public space. And then banned the U.S. citizen from returning to the public space. So, just to be absolutely clear… The Trump administration is conditioning the public to obey masked federal agents, without questions and without rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

860,732 views • 6 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are caught on camera threatening to violently assault a U.S. citizen for exercising their First Amendment rights, in Columbia Heights, Minnesota. In the video, an agent is saying, “I’m telling you right now, it’ll be the first time and last time that I tell you this… you continue to follow us, I’m going to fucking put hands on you, arrest you, and take you in.” The person filming responds calmly, “You can’t.” The agent screams back, “Test me. Please test me!” Then another agent jumps in with, “You aren’t just standing around and watching. You are impeding. You understand that concept?” Which makes one thing painfully clear… the agent does not understand that concept at all. Filming law enforcement in public, following them at a lawful distance, and observing their actions is constitutionally protected activity. It is not obstruction. It is not impeding. And it sure as hell is not grounds for arrest. But, threatening violence and detention because someone is recording you is retaliation for protected speech. That IS illegal. And that is what ICE has become… agents openly admitting on camera that they will illegally use force because someone dared to watch them. Because they are violating the constitution, and they know that. And if this doesn’t terrify you, then stop pretending you care about free speech or the Constitution.
0:38

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are caught on camera threatening to violently assault a U.S. citizen for exercising their First Amendment rights, in Columbia Heights, Minnesota. In the video, an agent is saying, “I’m telling you right now, it’ll be the first time and last time that I tell you this… you continue to follow us, I’m going to fucking put hands on you, arrest you, and take you in.” The person filming responds calmly, “You can’t.” The agent screams back, “Test me. Please test me!” Then another agent jumps in with, “You aren’t just standing around and watching. You are impeding. You understand that concept?” Which makes one thing painfully clear… the agent does not understand that concept at all. Filming law enforcement in public, following them at a lawful distance, and observing their actions is constitutionally protected activity. It is not obstruction. It is not impeding. And it sure as hell is not grounds for arrest. But, threatening violence and detention because someone is recording you is retaliation for protected speech. That IS illegal. And that is what ICE has become… agents openly admitting on camera that they will illegally use force because someone dared to watch them. Because they are violating the constitution, and they know that. And if this doesn’t terrify you, then stop pretending you care about free speech or the Constitution.

Jesus Freakin Congress

940,833 views • 6 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.
0:28

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

Jesus Freakin Congress

126,024 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents surround a man who is already on his knees on the pavement, with his hands raised, while agents stand over him and verify his citizenship. This alone is a serious constitutional violation. ICE does not have authority to detain U.S. citizens to check their immigration status. They also do not need someone on their knees to “verify” citizenship. And forcing someone into a compliance position on the ground without probable cause constitutes an unlawful detention under the Fourth Amendment. After agents confirm he is a U.S. citizen, the man stands up and begins yelling… visibly angry and shaken. The man is yelling at agents for swarming his car at gun point, a U.S. citizen, and forcing him out. Saying, “I could’ve died.” ICE agents then try to claim it was because of his registration. A line they often use, that still doesn’t justify their actions. What this video shows is federal agents detaining first, forcing compliance, then checking legality afterward… the opposite of how policing in a constitutional system is supposed to work. If ICE can force a U.S. citizen to the ground over a car they happen to be driving, citizenship no longer protects you. This isn’t a minor mistake. It’s a clear abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and every American should be outraged.
0:57

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents surround a man who is already on his knees on the pavement, with his hands raised, while agents stand over him and verify his citizenship. This alone is a serious constitutional violation. ICE does not have authority to detain U.S. citizens to check their immigration status. They also do not need someone on their knees to “verify” citizenship. And forcing someone into a compliance position on the ground without probable cause constitutes an unlawful detention under the Fourth Amendment. After agents confirm he is a U.S. citizen, the man stands up and begins yelling… visibly angry and shaken. The man is yelling at agents for swarming his car at gun point, a U.S. citizen, and forcing him out. Saying, “I could’ve died.” ICE agents then try to claim it was because of his registration. A line they often use, that still doesn’t justify their actions. What this video shows is federal agents detaining first, forcing compliance, then checking legality afterward… the opposite of how policing in a constitutional system is supposed to work. If ICE can force a U.S. citizen to the ground over a car they happen to be driving, citizenship no longer protects you. This isn’t a minor mistake. It’s a clear abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and every American should be outraged.

Jesus Freakin Congress

722,343 views • 7 months ago

🚨In Key West, an ICE/Border Patrol agent threatened to PULL A U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THE CAR because he cursed at an agent… then had the audacity to tell the U.S. citizen to “learn your laws.” So, let’s learn them. In the video, Border Patrol agents pulled over a car of U.S. citizens and demanded everyone hand over their IDs. When the passenger says, “Bitch, fuck you,” an agent asks what he said and then threatens to pull him out of the vehicle if he “says one more thing like that.” The passenger correctly asks: “For what? That’s freedom of speech.” The agent responds: “That’s not how that works. Learn your laws.” Oh, we’re going to… Cursing at a government agent is not, by itself, a crime. The First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism, insults, and profanity directed at law enforcement, as long as it is not a physical threat. The government cannot punish people simply for verbally challenging or criticizing law enforcement. And it gets even worse. After the passenger calls the agent a “fucking white cracker,” the agent asks what he called him… and then tells another agent he is “thinking of calling in and arresting this guy.” For what? Because he hurt your feelings? The government does not get to arrest someone for speech they don’t like. And yes, Border Patrol has special authority near the border. That includes operating immigration checkpoints where agents can briefly stop vehicles, without individualized reasonable suspicion, for immigration questioning. But, that is different from a roving patrol stop. When not operating at a checkpoint, Border Patrol needs reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle for immigration questioning. And even at a checkpoint, the agents’ authority is not unlimited. A checkpoint stop does not automatically give them the right to search the vehicle, indefinitely detain people, or arrest someone because they said something an agent didn’t like. The Constitution does not say… “You have freedom of speech, unless a federal agent gets offended.” It says the government cannot punish you for exercising that right. And perhaps the most important part of this entire video is… The passenger knew his rights better than the federal agent threatening him. The agent told the U.S. citizen to learn his laws… But maybe the agent should have learned them first.
1:27

🚨In Key West, an ICE/Border Patrol agent threatened to PULL A U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THE CAR because he cursed at an agent… then had the audacity to tell the U.S. citizen to “learn your laws.” So, let’s learn them. In the video, Border Patrol agents pulled over a car of U.S. citizens and demanded everyone hand over their IDs. When the passenger says, “Bitch, fuck you,” an agent asks what he said and then threatens to pull him out of the vehicle if he “says one more thing like that.” The passenger correctly asks: “For what? That’s freedom of speech.” The agent responds: “That’s not how that works. Learn your laws.” Oh, we’re going to… Cursing at a government agent is not, by itself, a crime. The First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism, insults, and profanity directed at law enforcement, as long as it is not a physical threat. The government cannot punish people simply for verbally challenging or criticizing law enforcement. And it gets even worse. After the passenger calls the agent a “fucking white cracker,” the agent asks what he called him… and then tells another agent he is “thinking of calling in and arresting this guy.” For what? Because he hurt your feelings? The government does not get to arrest someone for speech they don’t like. And yes, Border Patrol has special authority near the border. That includes operating immigration checkpoints where agents can briefly stop vehicles, without individualized reasonable suspicion, for immigration questioning. But, that is different from a roving patrol stop. When not operating at a checkpoint, Border Patrol needs reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle for immigration questioning. And even at a checkpoint, the agents’ authority is not unlimited. A checkpoint stop does not automatically give them the right to search the vehicle, indefinitely detain people, or arrest someone because they said something an agent didn’t like. The Constitution does not say… “You have freedom of speech, unless a federal agent gets offended.” It says the government cannot punish you for exercising that right. And perhaps the most important part of this entire video is… The passenger knew his rights better than the federal agent threatening him. The agent told the U.S. citizen to learn his laws… But maybe the agent should have learned them first.

Jesus Freakin Congress

331,351 views • 23 days ago

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent was just caught on video violently shoving a TEENAGER to the ground, in a Chicago suburb. But it gets worse… In Joliet, IL, ICE agents jumped out of their cars, racially profiled a man, began handcuffing him, and forced him into an unmarked vehicle that had its license plate covered. And they did all of this before even confirming who he was. As U.S. citizens began recording the incident, ICE agents started forcing them farther back, even though they were not interfering with the arrest. One of the agents looked at a teenager, who was just standing there and filming, and said, “Step back a little bit.” The teenager wasn’t interfering. In fact, a woman was standing even closer. And then, without warning, the ICE agent violently shoved the teenager to the ground. Moments later, another ICE agent pulled out a taser and threatened the legal observers, despite them remaining away from the vehicle, and not interfering. And after all of that, about 20 minutes later… ICE released the man they had kidnapped because they realized he was not undocumented. Think about how insane that is… A man was detained, handcuffed, and taken away before ICE even confirmed they had the right person. That’s exactly why the Fourth Amendment exists… to protect people from unreasonable seizures by the government. And then there is the issue of an ICE agent shoving a teenager to the ground… Using significant physical force against someone, especially a teenager, who is not posing an immediate threat, not resisting, and not interfering… is excessive force. Federal agents do not get a free pass to assault teenagers because they are standing nearby. The First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement in public, and government officials cannot use intimidation, or force, to silence people who are lawfully documenting their actions. This wasn’t just about one man being kidnapped…. It was about everyone standing there. A teenager was thrown to the ground. Legal observers were threatened. U.S. citizens exercising their constitutional rights were intimidated. And an innocent man lost 20 minutes of his freedom because ICE believes they are allowed to kidnap anyone they want. So, why are these ICE agents not being held accountable?
1:05

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent was just caught on video violently shoving a TEENAGER to the ground, in a Chicago suburb. But it gets worse… In Joliet, IL, ICE agents jumped out of their cars, racially profiled a man, began handcuffing him, and forced him into an unmarked vehicle that had its license plate covered. And they did all of this before even confirming who he was. As U.S. citizens began recording the incident, ICE agents started forcing them farther back, even though they were not interfering with the arrest. One of the agents looked at a teenager, who was just standing there and filming, and said, “Step back a little bit.” The teenager wasn’t interfering. In fact, a woman was standing even closer. And then, without warning, the ICE agent violently shoved the teenager to the ground. Moments later, another ICE agent pulled out a taser and threatened the legal observers, despite them remaining away from the vehicle, and not interfering. And after all of that, about 20 minutes later… ICE released the man they had kidnapped because they realized he was not undocumented. Think about how insane that is… A man was detained, handcuffed, and taken away before ICE even confirmed they had the right person. That’s exactly why the Fourth Amendment exists… to protect people from unreasonable seizures by the government. And then there is the issue of an ICE agent shoving a teenager to the ground… Using significant physical force against someone, especially a teenager, who is not posing an immediate threat, not resisting, and not interfering… is excessive force. Federal agents do not get a free pass to assault teenagers because they are standing nearby. The First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement in public, and government officials cannot use intimidation, or force, to silence people who are lawfully documenting their actions. This wasn’t just about one man being kidnapped…. It was about everyone standing there. A teenager was thrown to the ground. Legal observers were threatened. U.S. citizens exercising their constitutional rights were intimidated. And an innocent man lost 20 minutes of his freedom because ICE believes they are allowed to kidnap anyone they want. So, why are these ICE agents not being held accountable?

Jesus Freakin Congress

250,681 views • 1 month ago

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally demanding a U.S. citizen prove their citizenship, in Brownsville, TX. In the video, ICE agents have a U.S. citizen boxed in with their vehicles. After demanding that he show his ID, the U.S. citizen asks if he is free to go, and then tells them to get the F away from his car. Instead of going back to their own cars, the agents tell him to “chill”… after they had already illegally detained him and demanded identification. The U.S. citizen then gets out of his car, to record the agents’ license plates, and one of the ICE agents has the audacity to say: “Sir, please don’t interfere with our investigations.” Interfere with what investigation? He WAS the investigation. If they’re letting him leave, then there is nothing left for him to “interfere” with. Recording government agents, in public, is protected by the First Amendment, and they don’t get to invent an “investigation” to discourage someone from filming. And this is becoming a pattern. ICE agents are stopping whoever they want… and demanding papers. But that is not how constitutional rights work. ICE didn’t have reasonable suspicion that he had committed an immigration violation… since he is a U.S. citizen. So, detaining him, and demanding that he identify himself, violates his Fourth Amendment rights. U.S. citizens are not required to prove their citizenship, to any law enforcement, simply because they were stopped and questioned. And that’s what makes these encounters so dangerous. When U.S. citizens refuse to comply with these unlawful demands, we’ve repeatedly seen ICE agents escalate the situation with physical force. Citizens have been shoved, dragged from vehicles, pinned to the ground, and pepper sprayed after refusing unlawful demands, or asserting their constitutional rights. And a right isn’t a right if exercising it means you risk being assaulted by the very government that’s supposed to protect it. This isn’t just about immigration anymore. It’s about whether every American can exercise their constitutional rights without fearing they’ll be met with intimidation, violence, or retaliation from federal agents. If federal agents can stop U.S. citizens, demand they prove who they are without lawful justification, and then escalate when people refuse… Then nobody’s constitutional rights are safe.
1:00

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally demanding a U.S. citizen prove their citizenship, in Brownsville, TX. In the video, ICE agents have a U.S. citizen boxed in with their vehicles. After demanding that he show his ID, the U.S. citizen asks if he is free to go, and then tells them to get the F away from his car. Instead of going back to their own cars, the agents tell him to “chill”… after they had already illegally detained him and demanded identification. The U.S. citizen then gets out of his car, to record the agents’ license plates, and one of the ICE agents has the audacity to say: “Sir, please don’t interfere with our investigations.” Interfere with what investigation? He WAS the investigation. If they’re letting him leave, then there is nothing left for him to “interfere” with. Recording government agents, in public, is protected by the First Amendment, and they don’t get to invent an “investigation” to discourage someone from filming. And this is becoming a pattern. ICE agents are stopping whoever they want… and demanding papers. But that is not how constitutional rights work. ICE didn’t have reasonable suspicion that he had committed an immigration violation… since he is a U.S. citizen. So, detaining him, and demanding that he identify himself, violates his Fourth Amendment rights. U.S. citizens are not required to prove their citizenship, to any law enforcement, simply because they were stopped and questioned. And that’s what makes these encounters so dangerous. When U.S. citizens refuse to comply with these unlawful demands, we’ve repeatedly seen ICE agents escalate the situation with physical force. Citizens have been shoved, dragged from vehicles, pinned to the ground, and pepper sprayed after refusing unlawful demands, or asserting their constitutional rights. And a right isn’t a right if exercising it means you risk being assaulted by the very government that’s supposed to protect it. This isn’t just about immigration anymore. It’s about whether every American can exercise their constitutional rights without fearing they’ll be met with intimidation, violence, or retaliation from federal agents. If federal agents can stop U.S. citizens, demand they prove who they are without lawful justification, and then escalate when people refuse… Then nobody’s constitutional rights are safe.

Jesus Freakin Congress

37,733 views • 1 month ago

🚨BREAKING: Newly released ICE agent camera footage directly contradicts the claim that Renee Nicole Good tried to hit an agent with her vehicle. From the agent’s own angle, it’s clear Renee Nicole Good never posed a threat. In the synchronized footage, you can see her wife attempting to get into the car. They are preparing to leave. Suddenly, multiple ICE agents rush the vehicle. One agent moves toward the driver’s door and attempts to open it, trying to pull her out. Renee backs up. She then clearly turns the wheel AWAY from the agent. The agent has an unobstructed view of the steering wheel on his phone. He can see she is turning the car away, not toward him. That is when he pulls his gun. He does not draw his weapon because she is threatening him with the vehicle, he can see she is turning AWAY from him. He draws it to stop her from leaving. As the car turns away, the agent leans over the hood and fires the first shot. By the second shot, he is already further to the side of the vehicle. By the third shot, the car is driving away. Every single shot was fired after it was clear the vehicle was moving AWAY from him. Those shots were not fired to protect his life. They were fired to stop her from leaving. That is not self-defense. That is lethal force used to prevent escape. That is murder.
0:42

🚨BREAKING: Newly released ICE agent camera footage directly contradicts the claim that Renee Nicole Good tried to hit an agent with her vehicle. From the agent’s own angle, it’s clear Renee Nicole Good never posed a threat. In the synchronized footage, you can see her wife attempting to get into the car. They are preparing to leave. Suddenly, multiple ICE agents rush the vehicle. One agent moves toward the driver’s door and attempts to open it, trying to pull her out. Renee backs up. She then clearly turns the wheel AWAY from the agent. The agent has an unobstructed view of the steering wheel on his phone. He can see she is turning the car away, not toward him. That is when he pulls his gun. He does not draw his weapon because she is threatening him with the vehicle, he can see she is turning AWAY from him. He draws it to stop her from leaving. As the car turns away, the agent leans over the hood and fires the first shot. By the second shot, he is already further to the side of the vehicle. By the third shot, the car is driving away. Every single shot was fired after it was clear the vehicle was moving AWAY from him. Those shots were not fired to protect his life. They were fired to stop her from leaving. That is not self-defense. That is lethal force used to prevent escape. That is murder.

Jesus Freakin Congress

328,164 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents in Minneapolis violently detained, threatened, and arrested a U.S. citizen for one reason only, he refused to prove his citizenship. In the video, agents immediately escalate to physical force. A man stands with his hands up, repeatedly saying, “I’m not doing anything,” while agents shove him, force him against his car, and begin an illegal search. No crime. No warrant. No probable cause. An agent falsely claims, “That’s assault,” while they are actively assaulting a U.S. citizen who is complying and not resisting. Moments later, the agent admits the truth, saying, “And all we needed was your ID,” openly acknowledging this was an unlawful detention based solely on a refusal to produce identification. That is not legal. The short agent then threatens, “Don’t move or you will be fucking tased.” The man calmly responds, “I’m not moving.” The short agent escalates again, snarling, “You’re a fucking bitch, and you’re going to learn the hard way.” That is a direct threat of violence against a U.S. citizen whose hands are already behind his back. They dig through his pockets anyway, repeating, “I just asked you for an ID,” as if that excuses violating the Fourth Amendment. Then, in a moment that exposes the entire operation, the short agent announces, “He has a gun on him! Wouldn’t you look at that.” As if Minnesota is not a conceal-carry state. The man immediately responds, “A fully registered firearm. Because I’m a U.S. citizen.” The short agent casually tosses the firearm onto the car after removing the magazine, demonstrating reckless handling of a legally owned weapon. By this point, they have removed his wallet, yet, still do not check his ID, and still continue the arrest. The man states the obvious, “Unlawful arrest.” The short agent replies, “We’ll see about that.” When asked what crime he committed, the short agent deflects, saying, “We’re going to talk about that when we get in the car,” knowing full well he is on camera and cannot articulate a lawful reason. Only then do agents begin changing their story, claiming the man “reached for something.” The man immediately corrects them, he reached for his whistle. ICE agents already admitted the detention was because he refused to show ID. They did not know he was carrying a firearm until after the illegal search. Now they are retroactively inventing justification. The video contradicts every word they say. This wasn’t law enforcement. This was intimidation, retaliation, and a fishing expedition carried out by armed agents. If not carry papers, as a U.S. citizen, gets you assaulted and arrested, then this isn’t law enforcement. It’s a police state.
3:05

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents in Minneapolis violently detained, threatened, and arrested a U.S. citizen for one reason only, he refused to prove his citizenship. In the video, agents immediately escalate to physical force. A man stands with his hands up, repeatedly saying, “I’m not doing anything,” while agents shove him, force him against his car, and begin an illegal search. No crime. No warrant. No probable cause. An agent falsely claims, “That’s assault,” while they are actively assaulting a U.S. citizen who is complying and not resisting. Moments later, the agent admits the truth, saying, “And all we needed was your ID,” openly acknowledging this was an unlawful detention based solely on a refusal to produce identification. That is not legal. The short agent then threatens, “Don’t move or you will be fucking tased.” The man calmly responds, “I’m not moving.” The short agent escalates again, snarling, “You’re a fucking bitch, and you’re going to learn the hard way.” That is a direct threat of violence against a U.S. citizen whose hands are already behind his back. They dig through his pockets anyway, repeating, “I just asked you for an ID,” as if that excuses violating the Fourth Amendment. Then, in a moment that exposes the entire operation, the short agent announces, “He has a gun on him! Wouldn’t you look at that.” As if Minnesota is not a conceal-carry state. The man immediately responds, “A fully registered firearm. Because I’m a U.S. citizen.” The short agent casually tosses the firearm onto the car after removing the magazine, demonstrating reckless handling of a legally owned weapon. By this point, they have removed his wallet, yet, still do not check his ID, and still continue the arrest. The man states the obvious, “Unlawful arrest.” The short agent replies, “We’ll see about that.” When asked what crime he committed, the short agent deflects, saying, “We’re going to talk about that when we get in the car,” knowing full well he is on camera and cannot articulate a lawful reason. Only then do agents begin changing their story, claiming the man “reached for something.” The man immediately corrects them, he reached for his whistle. ICE agents already admitted the detention was because he refused to show ID. They did not know he was carrying a firearm until after the illegal search. Now they are retroactively inventing justification. The video contradicts every word they say. This wasn’t law enforcement. This was intimidation, retaliation, and a fishing expedition carried out by armed agents. If not carry papers, as a U.S. citizen, gets you assaulted and arrested, then this isn’t law enforcement. It’s a police state.

Jesus Freakin Congress

3,222,421 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent just assaulted a TEENAGER in St. Charles, IL. In the video, ICE agents are seen running to their car while trying to cover their faces from U.S. citizens filming them in a parking lot. A teenager is calmly filming them, exercising his First Amendment right to record federal agents in public… when one of the agents suddenly shoves him into a car for absolutely no reason. The teenager immediately backs away. But instead of getting into the car, like the agent was originally about to do, he walks PAST his own car door, TOWARD the teenager, points his finger at him, and starts threatening him while the teen continues filming. The agent keeps screaming at the teenager to “get out of the way”… Except the teenager is literally standing BEHIND the vehicle, not blocking anything whatsoever. Then, while the agent himself is the one aggressively moving toward the teenager, he points his finger inches from the teen’s phone and says, “Do not step closer.” The teenager calmly responds, “I’m not in your way.” Because he wasn’t. Federal agents do not get to shove people because they’re uncomfortable being filmed. And contrary to what ICE seems to believe lately, the Constitution does not disappear the second they step in public. The agent violated the teenager’s First Amendment rights, by retaliating against him for filming law enforcement in public… something courts have repeatedly ruled is constitutionally protected. And the physical shove could also constitute unlawful battery and excessive force under color of law, because officers cannot legally use force against someone who is not threatening them, resisting, or obstructing anything. This teenager wasn’t attacking anyone, wasn’t blocking anyone, and he wasn’t resisting anything. He was filming. That’s it. ICE agents are now openly assaulting and trying to intimidate teenagers for recording them in public… and everyone should not be okay with that.
0:32

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent just assaulted a TEENAGER in St. Charles, IL. In the video, ICE agents are seen running to their car while trying to cover their faces from U.S. citizens filming them in a parking lot. A teenager is calmly filming them, exercising his First Amendment right to record federal agents in public… when one of the agents suddenly shoves him into a car for absolutely no reason. The teenager immediately backs away. But instead of getting into the car, like the agent was originally about to do, he walks PAST his own car door, TOWARD the teenager, points his finger at him, and starts threatening him while the teen continues filming. The agent keeps screaming at the teenager to “get out of the way”… Except the teenager is literally standing BEHIND the vehicle, not blocking anything whatsoever. Then, while the agent himself is the one aggressively moving toward the teenager, he points his finger inches from the teen’s phone and says, “Do not step closer.” The teenager calmly responds, “I’m not in your way.” Because he wasn’t. Federal agents do not get to shove people because they’re uncomfortable being filmed. And contrary to what ICE seems to believe lately, the Constitution does not disappear the second they step in public. The agent violated the teenager’s First Amendment rights, by retaliating against him for filming law enforcement in public… something courts have repeatedly ruled is constitutionally protected. And the physical shove could also constitute unlawful battery and excessive force under color of law, because officers cannot legally use force against someone who is not threatening them, resisting, or obstructing anything. This teenager wasn’t attacking anyone, wasn’t blocking anyone, and he wasn’t resisting anything. He was filming. That’s it. ICE agents are now openly assaulting and trying to intimidate teenagers for recording them in public… and everyone should not be okay with that.

Jesus Freakin Congress

75,937 views • 3 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents shot a man in the leg as he ran into his own home… while a pregnant woman and children were inside, in Minneapolis. In the video, the family is heard calling the police for help, saying ICE agents followed the man for about 30 minutes. When he reached his home, he ran inside. An agent then opened fired toward the house, hitting him in the leg. Let’s be clear about what that means. Law enforcement is not allowed to use lethal force just because someone runs. Law enforcement is not allowed to fire toward an occupied home. Law enforcement is not allowed to seize someone inside their home without a judicial warrant, absent extremely narrow circumstances. This shot was fired in the direction of a house with children inside. This was not a split-second traffic stop. This was not an imminent threat to anyone inside that home. If families are calling the police because federal agents are firing toward their house, the question isn’t whether this is normal. The question is how much longer the government will keep violating the Constitution before someone else is killed.
1:42

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents shot a man in the leg as he ran into his own home… while a pregnant woman and children were inside, in Minneapolis. In the video, the family is heard calling the police for help, saying ICE agents followed the man for about 30 minutes. When he reached his home, he ran inside. An agent then opened fired toward the house, hitting him in the leg. Let’s be clear about what that means. Law enforcement is not allowed to use lethal force just because someone runs. Law enforcement is not allowed to fire toward an occupied home. Law enforcement is not allowed to seize someone inside their home without a judicial warrant, absent extremely narrow circumstances. This shot was fired in the direction of a house with children inside. This was not a split-second traffic stop. This was not an imminent threat to anyone inside that home. If families are calling the police because federal agents are firing toward their house, the question isn’t whether this is normal. The question is how much longer the government will keep violating the Constitution before someone else is killed.

Jesus Freakin Congress

604,581 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were filmed, once again, assaulting U.S. citizens outside the Kane County Courthouse, in St. Charles, Illinois. In the video, ICE agents are arresting a man while people film the arrest. A person tries to get information from the man, when an ICE agent suddenly moves toward her and another woman, pushes them back, while pointing an expandable baton at them, in a threatening manner. One woman tells the agent that she has a right to record… which he responds by shoving her. The agent then threatens the person filming, pointing his baton at them, and yells, “don’t follow me.” As if simply observing law enforcement is a crime… especially when there’s a clear physical barrier separating them. The First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement in public. People filming, and not physically interfering, are exercising protected speech. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures and excessive force. Physical pushing and threatening citizens with a baton, when they are not resisting or obstructing, raises serious questions about whether force is being used lawfully, or as intimidation. Excessive force standards, used by federal law enforcement, requires any force to be objectively reasonable based on an actual threat or interference… not simply the presence of people recording, or criticizing them. So, once again… Filming and observing is not interference. Standing in public is not a threat. And this is not about “respecting authority.” It’s about whether constitutional rights still apply when citizens are watching government agents do their jobs.
0:37

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were filmed, once again, assaulting U.S. citizens outside the Kane County Courthouse, in St. Charles, Illinois. In the video, ICE agents are arresting a man while people film the arrest. A person tries to get information from the man, when an ICE agent suddenly moves toward her and another woman, pushes them back, while pointing an expandable baton at them, in a threatening manner. One woman tells the agent that she has a right to record… which he responds by shoving her. The agent then threatens the person filming, pointing his baton at them, and yells, “don’t follow me.” As if simply observing law enforcement is a crime… especially when there’s a clear physical barrier separating them. The First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement in public. People filming, and not physically interfering, are exercising protected speech. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures and excessive force. Physical pushing and threatening citizens with a baton, when they are not resisting or obstructing, raises serious questions about whether force is being used lawfully, or as intimidation. Excessive force standards, used by federal law enforcement, requires any force to be objectively reasonable based on an actual threat or interference… not simply the presence of people recording, or criticizing them. So, once again… Filming and observing is not interference. Standing in public is not a threat. And this is not about “respecting authority.” It’s about whether constitutional rights still apply when citizens are watching government agents do their jobs.

Jesus Freakin Congress

42,879 views • 2 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally assaulted a 19-year-old U.S. citizen, and then kidnapped him, while admitting on camera they didn’t even know who he was, in Olathe, Kansas. In the video, an agent is sitting on the teenager’s back as his 14-year-old brother screams that he’s a U.S. citizen, in a Walmart parking lot. The agent responds: “Well, we’re going to find that out since whoever drives this [pointing to the truck] isn’t.” That sentence is the admission. Because it shows the only thing they knew, at that moment, was something about the registered owner of the truck… not the person they had pinned to the pavement. Vehicle registration tells you who owns a car. It does NOT tell you who is driving it. Before law enforcement can detain someone, they need individualized reasonable suspicion tied to that person. If they had not confirmed the driver matched the registered owner… If they had not observed a crime… If they had no warrant… Then pinning him down, handcuffing him, and loading him into a vehicle raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You don’t get to tackle someone first and figure out who they are later. You don’t get to use force based on “we’ll find out.” The issue isn’t just that he’s a U.S. citizen… The issue is whether agents had lawful, INDIVIDUALIZED suspicion to detain him before they used force. Because when law enforcement starts treating vehicle registration as automatic suspicion for whoever is behind the wheel… That’s collective punishment. And the Constitution does not allow that.
1:07

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally assaulted a 19-year-old U.S. citizen, and then kidnapped him, while admitting on camera they didn’t even know who he was, in Olathe, Kansas. In the video, an agent is sitting on the teenager’s back as his 14-year-old brother screams that he’s a U.S. citizen, in a Walmart parking lot. The agent responds: “Well, we’re going to find that out since whoever drives this [pointing to the truck] isn’t.” That sentence is the admission. Because it shows the only thing they knew, at that moment, was something about the registered owner of the truck… not the person they had pinned to the pavement. Vehicle registration tells you who owns a car. It does NOT tell you who is driving it. Before law enforcement can detain someone, they need individualized reasonable suspicion tied to that person. If they had not confirmed the driver matched the registered owner… If they had not observed a crime… If they had no warrant… Then pinning him down, handcuffing him, and loading him into a vehicle raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You don’t get to tackle someone first and figure out who they are later. You don’t get to use force based on “we’ll find out.” The issue isn’t just that he’s a U.S. citizen… The issue is whether agents had lawful, INDIVIDUALIZED suspicion to detain him before they used force. Because when law enforcement starts treating vehicle registration as automatic suspicion for whoever is behind the wheel… That’s collective punishment. And the Constitution does not allow that.

Jesus Freakin Congress

397,183 views • 6 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents stalked a U.S. citizen, at a POLLING PLACE, to pressure her into deleting her post, from JANUARY, about indicting ICE agent, Jonathan Ross. The exact post read: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted! FEDERAL AGENTS walked into a polling place… one of the most protected civic spaces we have… to intimidate a citizen, over political speech, about holding law enforcement accountable. The document they handed her said… “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties,” The document also said she could be subject to both federal and state prosecution. And just to be clear… The post, in question, wasn’t “doxxing.” Doxxing is releasing private, non-public information. Repeating publicly reported facts… is not that. Because law enforcement’s identities are not supposed to be private information, especially when they have been involved in the death, or shooting, of a civilian… But, instead of upholding the constitution, the current administration is attempting to stretch “threatening” language to cover political speech they don’t like. And let’s talk about election integrity… Polling places are legally restricted civic spaces. It is illegal to deploy federal troops, or armed federal law enforcement, to any polling place. Using that space to confront someone, over speech about federal agents, is highly inappropriate at minimum… and potentially unlawful. And this isn’t the first instance federal agents have hunted U.S. citizens down to silence calls for government accountability. Which should alarm everyone… Because a government that punishes scrutiny instead of answering it, is not a government holding its agents accountable… It’s a system telling you its agents are above it.
2:49

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents stalked a U.S. citizen, at a POLLING PLACE, to pressure her into deleting her post, from JANUARY, about indicting ICE agent, Jonathan Ross. The exact post read: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted! FEDERAL AGENTS walked into a polling place… one of the most protected civic spaces we have… to intimidate a citizen, over political speech, about holding law enforcement accountable. The document they handed her said… “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties,” The document also said she could be subject to both federal and state prosecution. And just to be clear… The post, in question, wasn’t “doxxing.” Doxxing is releasing private, non-public information. Repeating publicly reported facts… is not that. Because law enforcement’s identities are not supposed to be private information, especially when they have been involved in the death, or shooting, of a civilian… But, instead of upholding the constitution, the current administration is attempting to stretch “threatening” language to cover political speech they don’t like. And let’s talk about election integrity… Polling places are legally restricted civic spaces. It is illegal to deploy federal troops, or armed federal law enforcement, to any polling place. Using that space to confront someone, over speech about federal agents, is highly inappropriate at minimum… and potentially unlawful. And this isn’t the first instance federal agents have hunted U.S. citizens down to silence calls for government accountability. Which should alarm everyone… Because a government that punishes scrutiny instead of answering it, is not a government holding its agents accountable… It’s a system telling you its agents are above it.

Jesus Freakin Congress

242,067 views • 2 months ago

ICE agents stopped an off-duty police officer, a U.S. citizen, and demanded she show her papers. She was not under arrest. There was no articulable suspicion of wrongdoing. 🚨 provides a constitutional breakdown of this incident in Minnesota: She attempted to record the stop—a protected First Amendment right. Agents hit the phone from her hand and drew their guns before she identified herself as law enforcement. This conduct violates: • 🔹 The Fourth Amendment — bans arbitrary stops and seizures • 🔹 The First Amendment — protects the right to record public officials • 🔹 Public trust — eroded when federal agents target citizens without cause This was not a checkpoint. It was not a warrant-based stop. It was a random demand for citizenship papers—a move without legal basis under U.S. law. When agents abandon the Constitution, the people have the right—and the duty—to respond lawfully, visibly, and together. Find out more about the capabilities PAXIS and how we can get it into the of every citizen and ally: #KnowYourRights #ConstitutionalCrisis #ICE #FirstAmendment #FourthAmendment #CivilRights #PAXIS
1:14

ICE agents stopped an off-duty police officer, a U.S. citizen, and demanded she show her papers. She was not under arrest. There was no articulable suspicion of wrongdoing. 🚨 provides a constitutional breakdown of this incident in Minnesota: She attempted to record the stop—a protected First Amendment right. Agents hit the phone from her hand and drew their guns before she identified herself as law enforcement. This conduct violates: • 🔹 The Fourth Amendment — bans arbitrary stops and seizures • 🔹 The First Amendment — protects the right to record public officials • 🔹 Public trust — eroded when federal agents target citizens without cause This was not a checkpoint. It was not a warrant-based stop. It was a random demand for citizenship papers—a move without legal basis under U.S. law. When agents abandon the Constitution, the people have the right—and the duty—to respond lawfully, visibly, and together. Find out more about the capabilities PAXIS and how we can get it into the of every citizen and ally: #KnowYourRights #ConstitutionalCrisis #ICE #FirstAmendment #FourthAmendment #CivilRights #PAXIS

Joe Walsh

20,195 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally stopped a U.S. citizen, who was walking down the street, and demanded that he prove his citizenship, in Atlantic City, New Jersey. And when someone stopped to film it… an ICE agent, in an unmarked vehicle, drove directly toward them, using their vehicle to intimidate them for exercising their constitutional right to record law enforcement. In the video, ICE agents stopped a man walking down the street and demanded he show them his ID. A person driving sees this, stops their car, and begins filming from across the street. Then, another agent, sitting in an unmarked vehicle, on the other side of the street, drives directly toward the person filming, and stops inches from the side of their car. The agents eventually let the U.S. citizen go… get into the vehicle that is still parked inches from the person filming, and then wave at them like this is all some kind of joke… and drive away. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable seizures. And when armed federal agents stop someone and demand identification, that is not a casual conversation. And the First Amendment protects the right to record government agents performing their duties in public, as long as you are not actually interfering with what they are doing. (Filming from across the street is not interfering) So, when armed federal agents stop someone walking down the street and demand proof of citizenship, while another agent uses a vehicle to intimidate someone documenting it, there are some serious constitutional questions that need to be raised. You should not have to prove you belong, in your own country, to armed government agents. And you should not be intimidated for documenting them. That is what government power without accountability looks like… When the government can violate your rights, and then tell you that your only option is to comply… you no longer live in a free country.
1:48

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally stopped a U.S. citizen, who was walking down the street, and demanded that he prove his citizenship, in Atlantic City, New Jersey. And when someone stopped to film it… an ICE agent, in an unmarked vehicle, drove directly toward them, using their vehicle to intimidate them for exercising their constitutional right to record law enforcement. In the video, ICE agents stopped a man walking down the street and demanded he show them his ID. A person driving sees this, stops their car, and begins filming from across the street. Then, another agent, sitting in an unmarked vehicle, on the other side of the street, drives directly toward the person filming, and stops inches from the side of their car. The agents eventually let the U.S. citizen go… get into the vehicle that is still parked inches from the person filming, and then wave at them like this is all some kind of joke… and drive away. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable seizures. And when armed federal agents stop someone and demand identification, that is not a casual conversation. And the First Amendment protects the right to record government agents performing their duties in public, as long as you are not actually interfering with what they are doing. (Filming from across the street is not interfering) So, when armed federal agents stop someone walking down the street and demand proof of citizenship, while another agent uses a vehicle to intimidate someone documenting it, there are some serious constitutional questions that need to be raised. You should not have to prove you belong, in your own country, to armed government agents. And you should not be intimidated for documenting them. That is what government power without accountability looks like… When the government can violate your rights, and then tell you that your only option is to comply… you no longer live in a free country.

Jesus Freakin Congress

114,998 views • 1 month ago

🚨ICE agents are threatening to assault and illegally arrest U.S. citizens in Portland, Maine. In the video, a man is legally observing ICE activity in his own neighborhood. Agents walk up to his car window and ask, “Are you following us?” The man replies, “Yeah.” An agent immediately escalates and says, “What you are doing is called impeding federal law enforcement. It’s an 18 U.S.C. §111 charge. This is your first and only warning. If you continue to impede and follow us, you will be arrested.” The man then correctly responds, “Yeah, but I’m not impeding you.” Another agent jumps in and says,“You just openly admitted you were following us, so…” And again, the man correctly explains, “I am following you. I’m not impeding you. I’m observing you.” Which is a constitutionally protected right. The agent responds anyway, “It is impeding.” The man replies, “No, it’s actually not.” At that point, the agents become visibly angry that he knows the law and threaten him again, saying, “This is your one warning. If you keep doing it, we will pull you back out and arrest you.” Just to be very clear… Following and observing law enforcement, without interference, is not a crime. Threatening arrest anyway is an abuse of power. Threatening to “pull him out” of his vehicle is a threat of unlawful force. These agents are not enforcing the law, they’re misstating it, weaponizing it, and hoping intimidation will do the rest. They don’t understand the laws they claim to enforce. They just parrot a few buzzwords and statute numbers, and expect the public to fold. And when that doesn’t work, they threaten violence. Because the biggest threat to an ICE agent is someone who knows their rights.
0:35

🚨ICE agents are threatening to assault and illegally arrest U.S. citizens in Portland, Maine. In the video, a man is legally observing ICE activity in his own neighborhood. Agents walk up to his car window and ask, “Are you following us?” The man replies, “Yeah.” An agent immediately escalates and says, “What you are doing is called impeding federal law enforcement. It’s an 18 U.S.C. §111 charge. This is your first and only warning. If you continue to impede and follow us, you will be arrested.” The man then correctly responds, “Yeah, but I’m not impeding you.” Another agent jumps in and says,“You just openly admitted you were following us, so…” And again, the man correctly explains, “I am following you. I’m not impeding you. I’m observing you.” Which is a constitutionally protected right. The agent responds anyway, “It is impeding.” The man replies, “No, it’s actually not.” At that point, the agents become visibly angry that he knows the law and threaten him again, saying, “This is your one warning. If you keep doing it, we will pull you back out and arrest you.” Just to be very clear… Following and observing law enforcement, without interference, is not a crime. Threatening arrest anyway is an abuse of power. Threatening to “pull him out” of his vehicle is a threat of unlawful force. These agents are not enforcing the law, they’re misstating it, weaponizing it, and hoping intimidation will do the rest. They don’t understand the laws they claim to enforce. They just parrot a few buzzwords and statute numbers, and expect the public to fold. And when that doesn’t work, they threaten violence. Because the biggest threat to an ICE agent is someone who knows their rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,240,660 views • 6 months ago