正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and...

117,724 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

David Paulides🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 的头像
David Paulides🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr I don’t think parents know this is true. Childhood vaccines have never been tested for their safety!! Why would you put unknown particles in your child if you knew that they’ve never been checked for safety????

Valerie Anne Smith 的头像
Valerie Anne Smith3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr And because vaccines are unsafe, every child is at far more risk from vaccine injury than from the disease for which the vaccine was even created.

Meցan Richmond 的头像
Meցan Richmond3 个月前

That’s because a double-blind, placebo-based randomised trial is done for efficacy. You don’t need a double-blind, placebo-based randomised trial for safety. The fact that people don’t understand this distinction is further confirmation that nobody knows how to think critically nowadays. Like does anybody properly think things through anymore?

Informed Families 的头像
Informed Families3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr It’s actually the other way around. It is extremely unethical to NOT do an inert saline solution placebo for EVERY single new j@b. The fact that they refuse to do this and attempt to redefine the meaning of ethics is evidence of corruption!

Chad Elwartowski 的头像
Chad Elwartowski3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr I never took the childhood vaccines. Consider me as part of the control group. Healthy my whole life.

Dawn Harrington 的头像
Dawn Harrington3 个月前

Egregious, criminal and absolutely monstrous! This is one more reason why EVERYONE MUST HAVE freedom of choice/informed consent whether or not to inject ANY vaccine into our children’s bodies (that contain Aluminum, polysorbate 80, formaldehyde, heavy metals, toxins, potassium chloride, DNA, RNA, fetal cell lines, technology, etc. etc.); there is NO OTHER path forward. This MUST happen or all the posturing and congressional hearings that are FINALLY revealing the horrific details about vaccines ARE FOR NAUGHT! Additionally, repealing the 1986 law Congress passed to give the pharma mafia immunity from harming our children, or worse, is LONG overdue.

Vince Clements 的头像
Vince Clements3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr The truth is, single placebo-based safety trials for childhood vaccines would destroy the vaxx-industry, and along with it, a major chunk of the sickness/sickcare industry. So many autoimmune diseases and other vaxx-related chronic health problems that people have normalized it.

Vincent Iannelli, MD 的头像
Vincent Iannelli, MD3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Except that many vaccines were studied using saline placebos and then those vaccines were used as controls to avoid putting more kids at risk of being completely unvaccinated during new studies. #StopAntiVaxPropaganda

teresa 的头像
teresa3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Anti vaccine propaganda is proliferating because stupid people read stupid stuff and accept it without doing any follow up on it.

DanBland 的头像
DanBland3 个月前

@decarlo_la @RobertKennedyJr The vaccine manufacturers themselves admitted that their products were “Unavoidably unsafe”. Those were the exact words they used to have their products made liable free. They were being sued too much and threatened to quit making vaccines.

Michael Olesen 💉😷🇺🇸🇺🇦 的头像
Michael Olesen 💉😷🇺🇸🇺🇦3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Liar

NHPUK South East 的头像
NHPUK South East3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr

T Grogan 的头像
T Grogan3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr RFKrazy Jr. is lying about that of course. Don't believe these liars if you value the lives of your family.

Max Edwards 的头像
Max Edwards3 个月前

All blind trust and "assumptions" by the public regarding the safety of vaccines should, at this point, be a thing of the past. The public needs to see transparency, accountability and serious reforms in order to restore trust in the NIH, FDA, and other related govt agencies that exist to protect the public. And even then, "trust, but verify" should be the norm.

Beth Bowers 的头像
Beth Bowers3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr And this is a resulted in one and 12 children diagnosed with autism. Wake up America!!

Jeff Lindsay 的头像
Jeff Lindsay3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr The reason for real control trials to test childhood vaccines is the reason that asking for voter ID in a California election is illegal: it would be "unethical" or "unfair" in the opinion of those who benefit from the fraud, whether it's voter fraud or pharma fraud.

Brian Moyer 的头像
Brian Moyer3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr There are ethics forbidding use of a placebo to compare to an existing vaccine. The goal is safety of a known formulation compared to the new (and likely cleaner antigen). All vaccines start vs a placebo - they have no other comparator. The vaccine pyramid approach is correct.

Mark Farris DDS 的头像
Mark Farris DDS3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr 💉☠️🪦

Aslan’s Gal 的头像
Aslan’s Gal3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr You are misrepresenting the situation. The original vaccines for each illness have placebo controlled trials. But improved versions are compared to the original version because it’s unethical to withhold care. The trials for updated versions are to see if they work better.

AMROUCHE 的头像
AMROUCHE3 个月前

L’industrie pharmaceutique a construit ce mythe depuis plus de 100 ans , avec Pasteur l’imposteur . La plupart des maladies infectieuses ont disparues avant l’arrivée des vaccins , par l’amélioration des conditions de vie , l’assainissement de l’eau , la salubrité des logements , une meilleure nutrition , les progrès de l’agriculture, l’hygiène corporelle et physique , la pénicilline , etc Ils se sont attribué des bénéfices qu’ils n’ont pas eu . Pire encore , l’argument des autorités sanitaires selon lequel « les vaccins sont sûrs . » repose avant tout sur la présomption que chaque nouveau vaccin est soumis à un processus rigoureux de test et d’homologation . Hors , contrairement aux médicaments, les vaccins ne sont pas soumis aux ECR ( étude contrôlée randomisée) en double aveugle. L’étalon d’or de la méthodologie pour prouver qu’une substance est sûre et efficace . Ils remplacent le placebo , par un vaccin d’une ancienne génération qui lui même n’a jamais fait l’objet d’essais cliniques en ECR. Ou bien des adjuvants aluminiques, ou des vaccins sans antigènes . Les essais cliniques des vaccins sont truqués pour cacher le taux réel ( et élevé ) d’effets secondaires , ce qui signifie que l’affirmation de longue date de l’establishment médical selon laquelle les vaccins sont sûrs n’a aucune valeur scientifique. Les méthodes employées par les autorités médicales , sont faites pour dissimuler l’insuffisance de tests d’innocuité des vaccins . La vérité cachée , odieuse et à peine croyable . Et la plupart des médecins généralistes ne savent pas cela . Ils ont subi un grave lavage de cerveau , depuis 60 ans par l’industrie pharmaceutique et les écoles de médecine dont les programmes sont rédigés par Big Pharma . 100 scientifiques dans le monde ont rédigé un livre «  des tortues jusqu’en bas . » apportant toutes les preuves que les vaccins n’ont aucun fondement scientifique et qu’ils ne sont ni sûrs , ni efficaces. Ils ont publié un premier livret ( 100 pages ) du premier chapitre . Tout y est dit !

John Stavros 的头像
John Stavros3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr There is still zero evidence showing vaccines cause autism.

Jurassic Carl 🦖🐭 的头像
Jurassic Carl 🦖🐭3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr It’s unethical to withhold a vaccine for which you don’t even have a saline placebo RCT to show that it’s safe or effective itself in the first place?? Absurd and unscientific.

NHPUK South East 的头像
NHPUK South East3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr

Wayne Dunlap 的头像
Wayne Dunlap3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr

Richard Amerling 的头像
Richard Amerling3 个月前

Allow me to respectfully disagree, Del. The ethics argument against true placebo-controlled trials for vaccines is a fig leaf. These people have no ethics. The studies aren’t done because they would reveal to the world exactly how “unavoidably unsafe” vaccines are! And isn’t it interesting how the rules of “evidence-based medicine” are suspended for vaccines? One cult supporting another. 🤯

Chris Ellet 的头像
Chris Ellet3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Francis Collins and Tony Fauci do not know anything about “ethics”. They made that clear all through Covid. They are greedy crooks and it’s high time you recognize this and put the word out instead of letting them go.

patrick kelley 的头像
patrick kelley3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Your wrong. All the original vaccines for a disease were. The next generation was tested against the existing vaccine which makes perfect sense.

AMROUCHE 的头像
AMROUCHE3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr

Mark Carmen 的头像
Mark Carmen3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Took 2 seconds to find that this is untrue. Every US childhood vaccine has undergone extensive randomized, double-blind, placebo based trials prior to approval.

Freeman A. 的头像
Freeman A.3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr This is from RFKs book on Fauci. Not one childhood vaccine has been safety tested against an INERT placebo.

diek 的头像
diek3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr Save your bullshat for the brainwashed, measles has made a comeback thanks to dickheads like you

WanderingDuck 的头像
WanderingDuck3 个月前

Just have an unvaccinated cohort as comparison. You can have them sign up for the trial and give their health information, but not receive any shots. That way you can factor in lifestyle if you need to. It’s unethical to not test drugs mandated for children to access school or daycare.

yoshkapundrick 的头像
yoshkapundrick3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr We are testing a new vaccine for rabies. Will you volunteer for the "double-blind, placebo-based" trial?

Conscious Being🕊️ 的头像
Conscious Being🕊️3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr That’s EXACTLY the excuse my son’s pediatrician gave me 18 years ago, when I asked why there were no studies done comparing vaxed vs. unvaxxed. These monsters need to be held accountable to the fullest extent.

T Grogan 的头像
T Grogan3 个月前

@RobertKennedyJr If parents follow this advice from these "know nothings" and the child dies, they should be able to sue sue sue. Look at the "Alex Jones " model.

相关视频

RFK Jr. Reveals: Gardasil Vaccine 37x More Lethal Than Cervical Cancer It Prevents "Gardasil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we've ever seen. Vaccine targets millions of pre-teens and teens, for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is zero. Nobody in their right mind would ever take this vaccine if they actually read the clinical literature." "Death rates in the Gardasil trial were 37 times the death rates for cervical cancer. Children who take that vaccine, the Gardasil vaccine, are 37 times more likely to die from the vaccine than they are to die from cervical cancer." "So the problem with Gardasil, like most vaccines, is it was never tested against a true placebo, an inert placebo. And the CDC and HHS say... If you don't test it against a true placebo, it's not science. You have no way of gauging whether the injuries you're seeing from the product are being caused by that product or whether they're just bad, sad coincidences." "The entity that is actually performing the study is, and paying for the study, is Merck. Merck got to decide which injuries were being caused by Gardasil and which were just bad coincidences and because it had that power it just wrote them all off as bad coincidences." "You can do that when there's no placebo because the injuries they were seeing in the control group which where the girls were getting aluminum neurotoxins were identical to the injuries they were getting in the Gardasil group so they said well we don't have to report any of these as vaccine injuries. So they were able to license something that is insanely dangerous."

Camus

1,463,131 次观看 • 1 年前

"We don't know if [any] vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine... [none of them have] been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility." This clip of board-certified primary care physician Dr. Jeffrey Barke (Dr. Jeff Barke) is taken from a podcast episode of The Counter Culture Mom Show (Tina Griffin) posted to Rumble on May 12, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "My push is really to educate, to give informed consent that isn't otherwise usually given. And the FDA package insert that's required by every vaccine, by every drug, by the way, has a standardized format, and it takes a while. And it took a while for me to teach myself how to read this package insert. "But they're all standardized. So, for example, section 13.1 that every parent should be aware of for childhood vaccines says the following. And I'm literally reading from the package insert. This vaccine is Vaxelis, which is insane. It has six vaccines in one, but nonetheless, they all read the same. So 13.1 says, quote, Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility. Translation, we don't know if this vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine. "Again, I'm not telling you that you shouldn't get this product, but what I am saying is you should be aware of this. You should also be aware of what the ingredients are in the vaccine. You should be aware of what the studies are that brought the product to market. "Most people, Tina, don't realize that not a single childhood vaccine that's on the CDC schedule and approved by the FDA has ever been tested against a placebo and inert placebo in a randomized control trial. Not a single one of them. Why do you think that is? And if you're listening to this and you're like, you're crazy, that's not true. It actually is true. And the reason why that is, is the FDA has a very different level of scrutiny to bring vaccines to the market versus bringing drugs to the market. "So all these vaccines have come to the market, especially after the act that was passed in the mid-1980s that gave the manufacturers of these vaccines liability protection. So if you're injured by one of these vaccines, you have no recourse against the manufacturer. Once that liability protection was enacted, then the vaccine schedule exploded. And it makes sense. There's no downside. There's only upside down. They make a boatload of money. They have no risk, they have no liability. You can't sue the vaccine company. "And it's said for every new vaccine that's added to the CDC childhood vaccine schedule, that is a 1 billion with a B dollar annuity for that vaccine company. They don't have to advertise. CDC does it for them. They don't have any liability. So it's money in their pocket. And. And what incentive do the vaccine companies have to be extra sure that the product that they're injecting into our children is safe and effective if they have no downside liability. So again, get it or don't get it, but only after informed consent. Only after you know the details of what's in the package insert."

Sense Receptor

22,703 次观看 • 1 年前