There is a reason why he is always relevant

It is necessary to be aggressive if your neighbouring countries are like Pakistan and China

No other option

If a country like America was afraid of him then there is no need to provide proof of his intelligence. He was , is , will always relevant.

Shi kha bhaijaan

This was Napoleon Bonaparte 's strategy and tactic in every war and which is why he was so successful almost every time(better success rate than Alexander, Charlemagne and Caeser). Flak the enemy from all the sides. Work of art! Why Indian army doesn't do this boggles my mind.

Politicians ko nobel prize chahiye

Your link in bio is losing you clicks. ⚠️ Watch this to find out why 👇 Seemless works 2X better than Linktree for more clicks from social to site.

Best way of defense is to attack

Defensive offence imo

Something is wrong - When pakistan attacked in 1965 Lal Bahadur Shastri was PM & When Nehru was PM , Pakistan had attacked (1948) Chaudhary was not commander.

@Singh_Armaan_