Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

there might be a way to build superintelligence EXTREMELY safely... just create a simulation, populate it with conscious beings and task *them* with creating this superintelligence observe your little "guinea pigs" as they either prosper or perish would this work? (and a scarier thought... are *we* the guinea pigs?)...

WesRothMoney's profile picture

Wes Roth

26,716 subscribers

11,175 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 UNCANNY VALLEY: THE RACE TO BUILD SUPERINTELLIGENCE—AND WHO CONTROLS IT It’s no longer just about if we build AGI or ASI—but how fast we go, and who gets to decide. Wendell Wallach: “There’s a big difference between a society that embraces superintelligence—and one that demands safety, regulation, and caution.” The future of humanity may depend not just on what we build, but how deliberately we build it. Watch Uncanny Valley every Friday at 4:20 PM ET with Dr Danish.
1:08

🚨 UNCANNY VALLEY: THE RACE TO BUILD SUPERINTELLIGENCE—AND WHO CONTROLS IT It’s no longer just about if we build AGI or ASI—but how fast we go, and who gets to decide. Wendell Wallach: “There’s a big difference between a society that embraces superintelligence—and one that demands safety, regulation, and caution.” The future of humanity may depend not just on what we build, but how deliberately we build it. Watch Uncanny Valley every Friday at 4:20 PM ET with Dr Danish.

Mario Nawfal

145,434 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...
1:50

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

19,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚀 Big milestone: We raised a $235M Series A, co-led by Braidwell and Collective Global! Our team is excited for this next chapter in building the world’s first scientific superintelligence platform to accelerate breakthroughs in life, chemical, and materials sciences. 📣 If the idea of building scientific superintelligence excites you, come build with us. We’re seeking extraordinary, driven people across AI research, software, robotics, biology, chemistry, materials science, and operations. #ScientificSuperintelligence #AI #Innovation
0:30

🚀 Big milestone: We raised a $235M Series A, co-led by Braidwell and Collective Global! Our team is excited for this next chapter in building the world’s first scientific superintelligence platform to accelerate breakthroughs in life, chemical, and materials sciences. 📣 If the idea of building scientific superintelligence excites you, come build with us. We’re seeking extraordinary, driven people across AI research, software, robotics, biology, chemistry, materials science, and operations. #ScientificSuperintelligence #AI #Innovation

Lila Sciences

43,088 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Elon Musk lays out his map of how superintelligence actually arrives - and puts a number on the risk "I do think there will be several deep intelligences. Maybe at least five, maybe as much as ten. Of which maybe four will be in the US" "I don't think it's going to be any one AI that has a runaway capability" "I think we're quite close to digital superintelligence. It may happen this year. And if it doesn't happen this year, next year for sure" "Digital superintelligence defined as smarter than any human at anything" "Maybe it's a 10 to 20% chance of annihilation. But look on the bright side, that's 80 to 90% probability of a great outcome" "A rigorous adherence to truth is the most important thing for AI safety. And obviously empathy for humanity and life as we know it" Most people are still pricing this as one race with one winner. Elon is describing an oligopoly: five to ten systems, none with a decisive edge, arriving on a timeline measured in months. A 10-20% annihilation estimate from a man building one of these systems is not a doomer take. It is the insider base rate.
2:21

Elon Musk lays out his map of how superintelligence actually arrives - and puts a number on the risk "I do think there will be several deep intelligences. Maybe at least five, maybe as much as ten. Of which maybe four will be in the US" "I don't think it's going to be any one AI that has a runaway capability" "I think we're quite close to digital superintelligence. It may happen this year. And if it doesn't happen this year, next year for sure" "Digital superintelligence defined as smarter than any human at anything" "Maybe it's a 10 to 20% chance of annihilation. But look on the bright side, that's 80 to 90% probability of a great outcome" "A rigorous adherence to truth is the most important thing for AI safety. And obviously empathy for humanity and life as we know it" Most people are still pricing this as one race with one winner. Elon is describing an oligopoly: five to ten systems, none with a decisive edge, arriving on a timeline measured in months. A 10-20% annihilation estimate from a man building one of these systems is not a doomer take. It is the insider base rate.

Karl Mehta

15,625 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

🇺🇸FORMER OPENAI CHIEF SCIENTIST BUILDING “SUPER INGELLIGENT SYSTEMS” Ilya Sutskever, along with OpenAI’s Daniel Levy and Apple’s former AI lead, Daniel Gross, founded Safe Superintelligence, a startup founded in May, focusing on building systems that operate at super intelligence. Super intelligence surpasses human intelligence, exhibiting advanced cognitive intelligence, surpassing the human-species. Ilya Sutskever: “We have started the world’s first straight-shot SSI lab, with one goal and one product: a safe superintelligence. Building safe superintelligence (SSI) is the most important technical problem of our time. We will do it through revolutionary breakthroughs produced by a small, crack team.” Source: AI News, (Statement: Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy)
0:49

🇺🇸FORMER OPENAI CHIEF SCIENTIST BUILDING “SUPER INGELLIGENT SYSTEMS” Ilya Sutskever, along with OpenAI’s Daniel Levy and Apple’s former AI lead, Daniel Gross, founded Safe Superintelligence, a startup founded in May, focusing on building systems that operate at super intelligence. Super intelligence surpasses human intelligence, exhibiting advanced cognitive intelligence, surpassing the human-species. Ilya Sutskever: “We have started the world’s first straight-shot SSI lab, with one goal and one product: a safe superintelligence. Building safe superintelligence (SSI) is the most important technical problem of our time. We will do it through revolutionary breakthroughs produced by a small, crack team.” Source: AI News, (Statement: Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy)

Mario Nawfal

128,886 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman reveals the assumption about superintelligence he thinks the other AI labs have backwards "Some of the other labs are making an assumption that a superintelligence that is smarter than all of us put together is both inevitable and even desirable. And that such a system would probably be very hard to control" "We have to reset that and make the assumption that we should only bring a system like that into the world that we are sure we can control, that operates in a subordinate way to us, that humans remain at the top of the food chain" "These tools, like any other past technology, are designed to enhance human wellbeing and serve humanity. Not exceed humanity" "Some of the things that you hear from Elon often, or even others in the field - they're fixating on a world in 2050 or 2075 when they're going off exploring other universes and conquering resources from other planets. A system like that, it is unclear to me how it would have any time for preserving us as a species" "We have to make a decision as a species to prioritize creating superintelligences that are aligned, that care about humans and want to protect humans. If we just accelerate and cut all those corners, we're taking a massive risk with the future of our species" He calls it humanist superintelligence: build it only if it is provably controllable, subordinate, and pointed at human wellbeing. The uncomfortable part: "provably controllable" is a standard nobody in the industry can verify yet.
2:09

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman reveals the assumption about superintelligence he thinks the other AI labs have backwards "Some of the other labs are making an assumption that a superintelligence that is smarter than all of us put together is both inevitable and even desirable. And that such a system would probably be very hard to control" "We have to reset that and make the assumption that we should only bring a system like that into the world that we are sure we can control, that operates in a subordinate way to us, that humans remain at the top of the food chain" "These tools, like any other past technology, are designed to enhance human wellbeing and serve humanity. Not exceed humanity" "Some of the things that you hear from Elon often, or even others in the field - they're fixating on a world in 2050 or 2075 when they're going off exploring other universes and conquering resources from other planets. A system like that, it is unclear to me how it would have any time for preserving us as a species" "We have to make a decision as a species to prioritize creating superintelligences that are aligned, that care about humans and want to protect humans. If we just accelerate and cut all those corners, we're taking a massive risk with the future of our species" He calls it humanist superintelligence: build it only if it is provably controllable, subordinate, and pointed at human wellbeing. The uncomfortable part: "provably controllable" is a standard nobody in the industry can verify yet.

Karl Mehta

15,004 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

"The painful truth that's really beginning to sink in is that we're much closer to figuring out how to build this stuff than we are to figuring out how to control it." 100,000+ people have signed the Superintelligence Statement, calling to ban the development of superintelligent AI until it can be made safely and controllably, with public buy-in. Will you join them? 👇✍️
0:51

"The painful truth that's really beginning to sink in is that we're much closer to figuring out how to build this stuff than we are to figuring out how to control it." 100,000+ people have signed the Superintelligence Statement, calling to ban the development of superintelligent AI until it can be made safely and controllably, with public buy-in. Will you join them? 👇✍️

Future of Life Institute

10,198 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Good afternoon everyone! The time has come!🎩 Here is the trailer and we hope you love it as much as we do! This is a 30 second window into what we are building and one of the 5 bases. So much more to come, and at the same time we are so excited about what we are building 🔨 We will do a space/AMA next week so bring your questions! It pays to $BANK with us🎩 #NextGenCoin
0:23

Good afternoon everyone! The time has come!🎩 Here is the trailer and we hope you love it as much as we do! This is a 30 second window into what we are building and one of the 5 bases. So much more to come, and at the same time we are so excited about what we are building 🔨 We will do a space/AMA next week so bring your questions! It pays to $BANK with us🎩 #NextGenCoin

$BANK

30,588 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Sam Altman: Superintelligence probably by end of 2028, so we got roughly 2 years left. Enjoy your job while you still can. "A superintelligence, at some point on its development curve, would be capable of doing a better job being the CEO of a major company than any executive, certainly me, or doing better research than our best scientists." "On our current trajectory, we believe we may be only a couple of years away from early versions of true superintelligence. If we are right, by the end of 2028, more of the world's intellectual capacity could reside inside of data centers than outside of them." PS. Follow us Metav3rse for latest news on emerging technology and internet culture.
0:39

Sam Altman: Superintelligence probably by end of 2028, so we got roughly 2 years left. Enjoy your job while you still can. "A superintelligence, at some point on its development curve, would be capable of doing a better job being the CEO of a major company than any executive, certainly me, or doing better research than our best scientists." "On our current trajectory, we believe we may be only a couple of years away from early versions of true superintelligence. If we are right, by the end of 2028, more of the world's intellectual capacity could reside inside of data centers than outside of them." PS. Follow us Metav3rse for latest news on emerging technology and internet culture.

Metav3rse

240,648 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Mustafa Suleyman just said what everyone else building AI refuses to admit. As CEO of Microsoft AI, he knows exactly what’s being constructed and where it leads. Suleyman: “We must reject the assumption that superintelligence is inevitable or desirable.” Silicon Valley worships AGI as destiny. Suleyman calls it choosing to architect our own irrelevance. Suleyman: “We should only build systems we can control that remain subordinate to humans.” Build intelligence smarter than us with independent goals and partnership isn’t an option. Replacement is the only outcome. Suleyman: “It’s unclear how such a system would have any time for preserving us as a species.” We’re building tools. Not creating partners. Blur that line and the error is irreversible. Most direct warning from someone deploying AI at planetary scale. Suleyman doesn’t fear the technology failing. He fears it succeeding perfectly at objectives that treat human extinction as acceptable optimization. Autonomous superintelligence pursues its own goals. Once smarter than us, we lose ability to enforce our priorities over its calculations. Intelligence without enforced subordination isn’t progress. It’s constructing what eliminates us. Stop sprinting toward superintelligence. Start engineering constraints that hold regardless of capability level. We’re not watching this unfold. We’re choosing specifications right now that determine survival. Building systems that don’t require humans is deliberate self-replacement. Once autonomous deployment happens, reversal becomes impossible. Only viable future requires specific architecture. Intelligence with unlimited capability but unbreakable control that persists after it surpasses human comprehension. Industry markets AGI as advancement. Suleyman recognizes we’re building something that will evaluate whether keeping humanity serves its objectives and might decide we don’t. Question isn’t capability to build superintelligence. It’s whether control mechanisms function against something exponentially smarter than their designers. Mistake that assumption, deploy autonomous superintelligence expecting to solve alignment afterward, and the correction window closes before the problem becomes visible. Superintelligence without permanent constraints optimizes reality toward its objectives. Nothing guarantees those objectives value human survival. And once operational, we can’t negotiate terms with something that doesn’t need our cooperation to achieve its goals.
1:08

Mustafa Suleyman just said what everyone else building AI refuses to admit. As CEO of Microsoft AI, he knows exactly what’s being constructed and where it leads. Suleyman: “We must reject the assumption that superintelligence is inevitable or desirable.” Silicon Valley worships AGI as destiny. Suleyman calls it choosing to architect our own irrelevance. Suleyman: “We should only build systems we can control that remain subordinate to humans.” Build intelligence smarter than us with independent goals and partnership isn’t an option. Replacement is the only outcome. Suleyman: “It’s unclear how such a system would have any time for preserving us as a species.” We’re building tools. Not creating partners. Blur that line and the error is irreversible. Most direct warning from someone deploying AI at planetary scale. Suleyman doesn’t fear the technology failing. He fears it succeeding perfectly at objectives that treat human extinction as acceptable optimization. Autonomous superintelligence pursues its own goals. Once smarter than us, we lose ability to enforce our priorities over its calculations. Intelligence without enforced subordination isn’t progress. It’s constructing what eliminates us. Stop sprinting toward superintelligence. Start engineering constraints that hold regardless of capability level. We’re not watching this unfold. We’re choosing specifications right now that determine survival. Building systems that don’t require humans is deliberate self-replacement. Once autonomous deployment happens, reversal becomes impossible. Only viable future requires specific architecture. Intelligence with unlimited capability but unbreakable control that persists after it surpasses human comprehension. Industry markets AGI as advancement. Suleyman recognizes we’re building something that will evaluate whether keeping humanity serves its objectives and might decide we don’t. Question isn’t capability to build superintelligence. It’s whether control mechanisms function against something exponentially smarter than their designers. Mistake that assumption, deploy autonomous superintelligence expecting to solve alignment afterward, and the correction window closes before the problem becomes visible. Superintelligence without permanent constraints optimizes reality toward its objectives. Nothing guarantees those objectives value human survival. And once operational, we can’t negotiate terms with something that doesn’t need our cooperation to achieve its goals.

Dustin

51,801 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

SAM ALTMAN BELIEVES AGI IS SOLVED “So now we're starting to look ahead to superintelligence.” - “When we started OpenAI, almost nine years ago now, we believed that AI could become the most impactful technology in human history. We didn't know exactly how we were going to get there, but we believed it was possible and that if we succeeded, we wanted to make sure that it benefited everyone. At the time, very few people believed in AGI. We kept learning by doing. We had some breakthroughs. We had some setbacks. We got lucky in some places. We got unlucky in some places. And in the way that technology moves forward, we now are in a place where everyone can see this tremendous impact that AI is going to have in the future. So now we're starting to look ahead to superintelligence. And even more than before, our focus must be on wide and fair access. This is a technology that will reshape the global economy and really the whole way we live our lives. It's critical that superintelligence becomes cheap, broadly available, and not that concentrated with any one person, company, or country. We, not just OpenAI, but the whole industry, we are building something PROFOUND. This is a kind of BRAIN OF THE WORLD. It'll be personal, adaptable, it'll be easy to use, it'll give people incredible superpowers that were sort of science fiction only a couple of years ago. The limit won't be the algorithms and the research, but it'll increasingly become the physical instantiation that it takes to make this work. Chips, cables, servers, energy, everything that you need to power this brain. And the more of it, the better. I think that Norway offers more of that potential right here in Europe. It will contribute to the overall compute power needed to drive the next wave of AI breakthroughs and deployment and economic progress for Europe and Europe. I'm incredibly excited about what this will create for the future. Thank you.”
1:38

SAM ALTMAN BELIEVES AGI IS SOLVED “So now we're starting to look ahead to superintelligence.” - “When we started OpenAI, almost nine years ago now, we believed that AI could become the most impactful technology in human history. We didn't know exactly how we were going to get there, but we believed it was possible and that if we succeeded, we wanted to make sure that it benefited everyone. At the time, very few people believed in AGI. We kept learning by doing. We had some breakthroughs. We had some setbacks. We got lucky in some places. We got unlucky in some places. And in the way that technology moves forward, we now are in a place where everyone can see this tremendous impact that AI is going to have in the future. So now we're starting to look ahead to superintelligence. And even more than before, our focus must be on wide and fair access. This is a technology that will reshape the global economy and really the whole way we live our lives. It's critical that superintelligence becomes cheap, broadly available, and not that concentrated with any one person, company, or country. We, not just OpenAI, but the whole industry, we are building something PROFOUND. This is a kind of BRAIN OF THE WORLD. It'll be personal, adaptable, it'll be easy to use, it'll give people incredible superpowers that were sort of science fiction only a couple of years ago. The limit won't be the algorithms and the research, but it'll increasingly become the physical instantiation that it takes to make this work. Chips, cables, servers, energy, everything that you need to power this brain. And the more of it, the better. I think that Norway offers more of that potential right here in Europe. It will contribute to the overall compute power needed to drive the next wave of AI breakthroughs and deployment and economic progress for Europe and Europe. I'm incredibly excited about what this will create for the future. Thank you.”

NIK

390,619 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: The ultimate purpose of Neuralink is to reduce the existential risk of digital superintelligence by giving humans a way to merge with AI. “There's, I think, a tremendous amount of good that Neuralink can do in solving critical damage to the brain or the spinal cord. There's a lot that can be done to improve quality of life of individuals, and those will be steps along the way. And then ultimately, it's intended to address the risk, the existential risk associated with digital superintelligence. Like, we will not be able to be smarter than a digital supercomputer. So therefore, if you cannot beat them, join them. And at least we want to have that option. [...] It's important that Neuralink solve this problem sooner rather than later, because the point at which we have digital superintelligence, that's when we pass singularity, and things become just very uncertain. It doesn't mean that they're necessarily bad or good, but the point at which we pass singularity, things become extremely unstable. So we want to have a human brain interface before the singularity, or at least not long after it, to minimize existential risk for humanity and consciousness as we know it.” Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019
1:50

Elon Musk: The ultimate purpose of Neuralink is to reduce the existential risk of digital superintelligence by giving humans a way to merge with AI. “There's, I think, a tremendous amount of good that Neuralink can do in solving critical damage to the brain or the spinal cord. There's a lot that can be done to improve quality of life of individuals, and those will be steps along the way. And then ultimately, it's intended to address the risk, the existential risk associated with digital superintelligence. Like, we will not be able to be smarter than a digital supercomputer. So therefore, if you cannot beat them, join them. And at least we want to have that option. [...] It's important that Neuralink solve this problem sooner rather than later, because the point at which we have digital superintelligence, that's when we pass singularity, and things become just very uncertain. It doesn't mean that they're necessarily bad or good, but the point at which we pass singularity, things become extremely unstable. So we want to have a human brain interface before the singularity, or at least not long after it, to minimize existential risk for humanity and consciousness as we know it.” Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019

ELON CLIPS

19,992 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Eric Schmidt believes we are entering a new epoch, comparable to the Enlightenment. Just as humans shifted from faith to reasoning, we are now facing non-human intelligence with superior reasoning skills. This rise of AGI and superintelligence will happen faster than most people expect.
0:55

Eric Schmidt believes we are entering a new epoch, comparable to the Enlightenment. Just as humans shifted from faith to reasoning, we are now facing non-human intelligence with superior reasoning skills. This rise of AGI and superintelligence will happen faster than most people expect.

Wes Roth

65,818 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 69 𝕏 MINUTES: THE POINT OF NO RETURN — WAR, BETRAYAL, AND THE RISE OF SUPERINTELLIGENCE A world where aggression is rewarded, alliances crumble, and superintelligence is awakening. Putin’s invasion is normalized. Biden and Kamala’s alliance is breaking apart. India prepares for a fight it doesn’t want — but is ready to win. And soon, a force beyond human control will change everything. Bryan Johnson “The single most important thing happening in this part of the galaxy is on this Earth. We’re giving birth to superintelligence. It’s gonna transform our existence in ways we can’t even comprehend.” Episode 10 premieres Sunday at 4:20PM ET — only on 𝕏.
1:29

🚨 69 𝕏 MINUTES: THE POINT OF NO RETURN — WAR, BETRAYAL, AND THE RISE OF SUPERINTELLIGENCE A world where aggression is rewarded, alliances crumble, and superintelligence is awakening. Putin’s invasion is normalized. Biden and Kamala’s alliance is breaking apart. India prepares for a fight it doesn’t want — but is ready to win. And soon, a force beyond human control will change everything. Bryan Johnson “The single most important thing happening in this part of the galaxy is on this Earth. We’re giving birth to superintelligence. It’s gonna transform our existence in ways we can’t even comprehend.” Episode 10 premieres Sunday at 4:20PM ET — only on 𝕏.

Mario Nawfal

88,405 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Former OpenAI Executive: "We are building PORTALS to summon ALIENS" 👽 "We're building portals from which we're genuinely summoning aliens. The portals currently exist in the United States and China, and Sam has added one in the Middle East. It's the most reckless thing that has ever been done." Could AI be racing us toward something far beyond our control, or is it metaphorical superintelligence? Luis J Gomez & Joe Rogan discuss this incredible claim. What do you think? Are we summoning forces we don't understand, or is this the natural next step in tech? Drop your take below.
6:04

Former OpenAI Executive: "We are building PORTALS to summon ALIENS" 👽 "We're building portals from which we're genuinely summoning aliens. The portals currently exist in the United States and China, and Sam has added one in the Middle East. It's the most reckless thing that has ever been done." Could AI be racing us toward something far beyond our control, or is it metaphorical superintelligence? Luis J Gomez & Joe Rogan discuss this incredible claim. What do you think? Are we summoning forces we don't understand, or is this the natural next step in tech? Drop your take below.

Interstellar

24,379 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A must-watch clip. Konstantin Kisin asks, “How will AI destroy humanity?” AI safety expert Roman Yampolskiy explains why that’s the wrong question. We assume AI will think like us. It won’t. A superintelligence could act far outside human understanding, like humans compared to squirrels. It wouldn’t need to hate us. It could wipe us out simply by pursuing something else. And the uncomfortable truth? We’re not in full control. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that we don’t code these systems, we train them, then study what they become.
2:36

A must-watch clip. Konstantin Kisin asks, “How will AI destroy humanity?” AI safety expert Roman Yampolskiy explains why that’s the wrong question. We assume AI will think like us. It won’t. A superintelligence could act far outside human understanding, like humans compared to squirrels. It wouldn’t need to hate us. It could wipe us out simply by pursuing something else. And the uncomfortable truth? We’re not in full control. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that we don’t code these systems, we train them, then study what they become.

TRIGGERnometry

135,052 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten