Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

there might be a way to build superintelligence EXTREMELY safely... just create a simulation, populate it with conscious beings and task *them* with creating this superintelligence observe your little "guinea pigs" as they either prosper or perish would this work? (and a scarier thought... are *we* the guinea pigs?)...

WesRothMoney's profile picture

Wes Roth

26,716 subscribers

11,175 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Roman Yampolskiy: we are almost certainly in a simulation, which is supported by the unlikelihood of living at the most interesting time in the history of the Universe, and AI superintelligence may help us hack and escape the simulation
0:56

Roman Yampolskiy: we are almost certainly in a simulation, which is supported by the unlikelihood of living at the most interesting time in the history of the Universe, and AI superintelligence may help us hack and escape the simulation

Tsarathustra

371,998 views • 2 years ago

🚨 UNCANNY VALLEY: THE RACE TO BUILD SUPERINTELLIGENCE—AND WHO CONTROLS IT It’s no longer just about if we build AGI or ASI—but how fast we go, and who gets to decide. Wendell Wallach: “There’s a big difference between a society that embraces superintelligence—and one that demands safety, regulation, and caution.” The future of humanity may depend not just on what we build, but how deliberately we build it. Watch Uncanny Valley every Friday at 4:20 PM ET with Dr Danish.
1:08

🚨 UNCANNY VALLEY: THE RACE TO BUILD SUPERINTELLIGENCE—AND WHO CONTROLS IT It’s no longer just about if we build AGI or ASI—but how fast we go, and who gets to decide. Wendell Wallach: “There’s a big difference between a society that embraces superintelligence—and one that demands safety, regulation, and caution.” The future of humanity may depend not just on what we build, but how deliberately we build it. Watch Uncanny Valley every Friday at 4:20 PM ET with Dr Danish.

Mario Nawfal

145,434 views • 1 year ago

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...
1:50

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

19,252 views • 1 year ago

99.9% CHANCE WE ALL DIE Roman Yampolskiy—The World's Top AI Doomer On Superintelligence and the Simulation AI For Good Summit - Geneva, Switzerland Joe Allen Dr. Roman Yampolskiy
8:00

99.9% CHANCE WE ALL DIE Roman Yampolskiy—The World's Top AI Doomer On Superintelligence and the Simulation AI For Good Summit - Geneva, Switzerland Joe Allen Dr. Roman Yampolskiy

Bannon’s WarRoom

16,612 views • 1 year ago

We either build the superintelligence or we all get nebulized. This is the Law of Dharma.
0:25

We either build the superintelligence or we all get nebulized. This is the Law of Dharma.

Syd Steyerhart

35,073 views • 5 months ago

🚀 Big milestone: We raised a $235M Series A, co-led by Braidwell and Collective Global! Our team is excited for this next chapter in building the world’s first scientific superintelligence platform to accelerate breakthroughs in life, chemical, and materials sciences. 📣 If the idea of building scientific superintelligence excites you, come build with us. We’re seeking extraordinary, driven people across AI research, software, robotics, biology, chemistry, materials science, and operations. #ScientificSuperintelligence #AI #Innovation
0:30

🚀 Big milestone: We raised a $235M Series A, co-led by Braidwell and Collective Global! Our team is excited for this next chapter in building the world’s first scientific superintelligence platform to accelerate breakthroughs in life, chemical, and materials sciences. 📣 If the idea of building scientific superintelligence excites you, come build with us. We’re seeking extraordinary, driven people across AI research, software, robotics, biology, chemistry, materials science, and operations. #ScientificSuperintelligence #AI #Innovation

Lila Sciences

42,934 views • 10 months ago

Elon Musk lays out his map of how superintelligence actually arrives - and puts a number on the risk "I do think there will be several deep intelligences. Maybe at least five, maybe as much as ten. Of which maybe four will be in the US" "I don't think it's going to be any one AI that has a runaway capability" "I think we're quite close to digital superintelligence. It may happen this year. And if it doesn't happen this year, next year for sure" "Digital superintelligence defined as smarter than any human at anything" "Maybe it's a 10 to 20% chance of annihilation. But look on the bright side, that's 80 to 90% probability of a great outcome" "A rigorous adherence to truth is the most important thing for AI safety. And obviously empathy for humanity and life as we know it" Most people are still pricing this as one race with one winner. Elon is describing an oligopoly: five to ten systems, none with a decisive edge, arriving on a timeline measured in months. A 10-20% annihilation estimate from a man building one of these systems is not a doomer take. It is the insider base rate.
2:21

Elon Musk lays out his map of how superintelligence actually arrives - and puts a number on the risk "I do think there will be several deep intelligences. Maybe at least five, maybe as much as ten. Of which maybe four will be in the US" "I don't think it's going to be any one AI that has a runaway capability" "I think we're quite close to digital superintelligence. It may happen this year. And if it doesn't happen this year, next year for sure" "Digital superintelligence defined as smarter than any human at anything" "Maybe it's a 10 to 20% chance of annihilation. But look on the bright side, that's 80 to 90% probability of a great outcome" "A rigorous adherence to truth is the most important thing for AI safety. And obviously empathy for humanity and life as we know it" Most people are still pricing this as one race with one winner. Elon is describing an oligopoly: five to ten systems, none with a decisive edge, arriving on a timeline measured in months. A 10-20% annihilation estimate from a man building one of these systems is not a doomer take. It is the insider base rate.

Karl Mehta

15,625 views • 9 days ago

🥔 Stuart Russell says superintelligence is coming, and CEOs of AI companies are deciding our fate. They admit a 10-25% extinction risk—playing Russian roulette with humanity without our consent. Why are we letting them do this?
1:24

🥔 Stuart Russell says superintelligence is coming, and CEOs of AI companies are deciding our fate. They admit a 10-25% extinction risk—playing Russian roulette with humanity without our consent. Why are we letting them do this?

vitrupo

33,070 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸FORMER OPENAI CHIEF SCIENTIST BUILDING “SUPER INGELLIGENT SYSTEMS” Ilya Sutskever, along with OpenAI’s Daniel Levy and Apple’s former AI lead, Daniel Gross, founded Safe Superintelligence, a startup founded in May, focusing on building systems that operate at super intelligence. Super intelligence surpasses human intelligence, exhibiting advanced cognitive intelligence, surpassing the human-species. Ilya Sutskever: “We have started the world’s first straight-shot SSI lab, with one goal and one product: a safe superintelligence. Building safe superintelligence (SSI) is the most important technical problem of our time. We will do it through revolutionary breakthroughs produced by a small, crack team.” Source: AI News, (Statement: Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy)
0:49

🇺🇸FORMER OPENAI CHIEF SCIENTIST BUILDING “SUPER INGELLIGENT SYSTEMS” Ilya Sutskever, along with OpenAI’s Daniel Levy and Apple’s former AI lead, Daniel Gross, founded Safe Superintelligence, a startup founded in May, focusing on building systems that operate at super intelligence. Super intelligence surpasses human intelligence, exhibiting advanced cognitive intelligence, surpassing the human-species. Ilya Sutskever: “We have started the world’s first straight-shot SSI lab, with one goal and one product: a safe superintelligence. Building safe superintelligence (SSI) is the most important technical problem of our time. We will do it through revolutionary breakthroughs produced by a small, crack team.” Source: AI News, (Statement: Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy)

Mario Nawfal

128,886 views • 2 years ago

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman reveals the assumption about superintelligence he thinks the other AI labs have backwards "Some of the other labs are making an assumption that a superintelligence that is smarter than all of us put together is both inevitable and even desirable. And that such a system would probably be very hard to control" "We have to reset that and make the assumption that we should only bring a system like that into the world that we are sure we can control, that operates in a subordinate way to us, that humans remain at the top of the food chain" "These tools, like any other past technology, are designed to enhance human wellbeing and serve humanity. Not exceed humanity" "Some of the things that you hear from Elon often, or even others in the field - they're fixating on a world in 2050 or 2075 when they're going off exploring other universes and conquering resources from other planets. A system like that, it is unclear to me how it would have any time for preserving us as a species" "We have to make a decision as a species to prioritize creating superintelligences that are aligned, that care about humans and want to protect humans. If we just accelerate and cut all those corners, we're taking a massive risk with the future of our species" He calls it humanist superintelligence: build it only if it is provably controllable, subordinate, and pointed at human wellbeing. The uncomfortable part: "provably controllable" is a standard nobody in the industry can verify yet.
2:09

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman reveals the assumption about superintelligence he thinks the other AI labs have backwards "Some of the other labs are making an assumption that a superintelligence that is smarter than all of us put together is both inevitable and even desirable. And that such a system would probably be very hard to control" "We have to reset that and make the assumption that we should only bring a system like that into the world that we are sure we can control, that operates in a subordinate way to us, that humans remain at the top of the food chain" "These tools, like any other past technology, are designed to enhance human wellbeing and serve humanity. Not exceed humanity" "Some of the things that you hear from Elon often, or even others in the field - they're fixating on a world in 2050 or 2075 when they're going off exploring other universes and conquering resources from other planets. A system like that, it is unclear to me how it would have any time for preserving us as a species" "We have to make a decision as a species to prioritize creating superintelligences that are aligned, that care about humans and want to protect humans. If we just accelerate and cut all those corners, we're taking a massive risk with the future of our species" He calls it humanist superintelligence: build it only if it is provably controllable, subordinate, and pointed at human wellbeing. The uncomfortable part: "provably controllable" is a standard nobody in the industry can verify yet.

Karl Mehta

14,879 views • 9 days ago

Google DeepMind's CoFounder Shane Legg sitsdown to talk about SuperIntelligence tl;dr Yes, we will reach superintelligence.
2:45

Google DeepMind's CoFounder Shane Legg sitsdown to talk about SuperIntelligence tl;dr Yes, we will reach superintelligence.

Chubby♨️

31,883 views • 6 months ago

"The painful truth that's really beginning to sink in is that we're much closer to figuring out how to build this stuff than we are to figuring out how to control it." 100,000+ people have signed the Superintelligence Statement, calling to ban the development of superintelligent AI until it can be made safely and controllably, with public buy-in. Will you join them? 👇✍️
0:51

"The painful truth that's really beginning to sink in is that we're much closer to figuring out how to build this stuff than we are to figuring out how to control it." 100,000+ people have signed the Superintelligence Statement, calling to ban the development of superintelligent AI until it can be made safely and controllably, with public buy-in. Will you join them? 👇✍️

Future of Life Institute

10,198 views • 8 months ago

Good afternoon everyone! The time has come!🎩 Here is the trailer and we hope you love it as much as we do! This is a 30 second window into what we are building and one of the 5 bases. So much more to come, and at the same time we are so excited about what we are building 🔨 We will do a space/AMA next week so bring your questions! It pays to $BANK with us🎩 #NextGenCoin
0:23

Good afternoon everyone! The time has come!🎩 Here is the trailer and we hope you love it as much as we do! This is a 30 second window into what we are building and one of the 5 bases. So much more to come, and at the same time we are so excited about what we are building 🔨 We will do a space/AMA next week so bring your questions! It pays to $BANK with us🎩 #NextGenCoin

$BANK

30,588 views • 2 years ago

AI companies are racing to build superintelligent AI, despite its many risks. Let's take our future back. 📝 Sign the Superintelligence Statement and join the growing call to ban the reckless development of superintelligence, until it can be made safely. #KeepTheFutureHuman
2:56

AI companies are racing to build superintelligent AI, despite its many risks. Let's take our future back. 📝 Sign the Superintelligence Statement and join the growing call to ban the reckless development of superintelligence, until it can be made safely. #KeepTheFutureHuman

Future of Life Institute

20,142 views • 8 months ago

Mark Zuckerberg: “We're starting to see early glimpses of self-improvement with the models. Developing superintelligence is now in sight. Our mission is to deliver personal superintelligence to everyone in the world. We should act as if it's going to be ready in the next two to three years. If that's what you believe, then you're going to invest hundreds of billions of dollars.”
1:38

Mark Zuckerberg: “We're starting to see early glimpses of self-improvement with the models. Developing superintelligence is now in sight. Our mission is to deliver personal superintelligence to everyone in the world. We should act as if it's going to be ready in the next two to three years. If that's what you believe, then you're going to invest hundreds of billions of dollars.”

vitrupo

298,958 views • 1 year ago

Sam Altman: Superintelligence probably by end of 2028, so we got roughly 2 years left. Enjoy your job while you still can. "A superintelligence, at some point on its development curve, would be capable of doing a better job being the CEO of a major company than any executive, certainly me, or doing better research than our best scientists." "On our current trajectory, we believe we may be only a couple of years away from early versions of true superintelligence. If we are right, by the end of 2028, more of the world's intellectual capacity could reside inside of data centers than outside of them." PS. Follow us Metav3rse for latest news on emerging technology and internet culture.
0:39

Sam Altman: Superintelligence probably by end of 2028, so we got roughly 2 years left. Enjoy your job while you still can. "A superintelligence, at some point on its development curve, would be capable of doing a better job being the CEO of a major company than any executive, certainly me, or doing better research than our best scientists." "On our current trajectory, we believe we may be only a couple of years away from early versions of true superintelligence. If we are right, by the end of 2028, more of the world's intellectual capacity could reside inside of data centers than outside of them." PS. Follow us Metav3rse for latest news on emerging technology and internet culture.

Metav3rse

239,932 views • 11 days ago