Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

There's only one problem with this, making a BBC wear a condom is racist! #BBC #BBCpropaganda #QOS #snowbunny #blackcock #whitegirl #whitegenocide #BNWO #BNWOFOREVER #doggystyle #ass #booty #bigbooty #cum #twerk #nsfw #cuck #cheating #cheatingforbigger #blowjob #bbconly #pawg

Gooner

12,522 subscribers

29,514 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #BBC #BBCpropaganda #QOS #snowbunny #blackcock #whitegirl #whitegenocide #BNWO #BNWOFOREVER #doggystyle #ass #booty #bigbooty #cum #twerk #nsfw #cuck #cheating #cheatingforbigger #blowjob #bbconly #pawg

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

How Modi Managed “THE MEDIA” To Stay In Power In 2002, Gujarat CM Narendra Modi sat in front of a BBC camera and admitted his one real weakness: “One area where I was very, very weak… that was how to handle the media.” He never forgot that lesson. He just decided the media should never be allowed to become a problem again. Fast forward to 2026. Between March and July, the government sent one blocking order every 68 seconds to Instagram, Facebook and YouTube. 1.95 lakh orders in five months. 1,275 every single day. Instagram — the platform students used during the Jantar Mantar protests — received more than 1 lakh of them. Last year the daily average was six. This is not “managing” the media. This is industrial-scale silencing. The same playbook that started with ED and CBI cases against NDTV, the takeover of Network18, and UAPA against NewsClick’s founder is now running on autopilot through the Sahyog portal. Content vanishes in three hours. Often without anyone even seeing the order. A government that needs to issue a takedown every 68 seconds is not confident. It is terrified of what people will say when they are not being watched. That is how you stay in power for this long — not by answering questions, but by making sure the questions never reach the public. When dissent is treated as a security threat and protest as a crime, the media is no longer a watchdog. It is just another department to be controlled. The 2002 admission was honest. The 2026 response is the real story. 68 seconds. That’s how long this government takes to silence you. He admitted one weakness in 2002. He spent the next 24 years making sure it never happened again. sohit mishra

How Modi Managed “THE MEDIA” To Stay In Power In 2002, Gujarat CM Narendra Modi sat in front of a BBC camera and admitted his one real weakness: “One area where I was very, very weak… that was how to handle the media.” He never forgot that lesson. He just decided the media should never be allowed to become a problem again. Fast forward to 2026. Between March and July, the government sent one blocking order every 68 seconds to Instagram, Facebook and YouTube. 1.95 lakh orders in five months. 1,275 every single day. Instagram — the platform students used during the Jantar Mantar protests — received more than 1 lakh of them. Last year the daily average was six. This is not “managing” the media. This is industrial-scale silencing. The same playbook that started with ED and CBI cases against NDTV, the takeover of Network18, and UAPA against NewsClick’s founder is now running on autopilot through the Sahyog portal. Content vanishes in three hours. Often without anyone even seeing the order. A government that needs to issue a takedown every 68 seconds is not confident. It is terrified of what people will say when they are not being watched. That is how you stay in power for this long — not by answering questions, but by making sure the questions never reach the public. When dissent is treated as a security threat and protest as a crime, the media is no longer a watchdog. It is just another department to be controlled. The 2002 admission was honest. The 2026 response is the real story. 68 seconds. That’s how long this government takes to silence you. He admitted one weakness in 2002. He spent the next 24 years making sure it never happened again. sohit mishra

Pragnya Gupta

25,257 просмотров • 8 дней назад

$It’s outrageous that President Donald Trump has threatened to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), say many in the media. “You have to admire the chutzpah,” wrote one columnist. “Donald Trump describing the BBC as ‘corrupt’ while threatening to take legal action….The man has never been known for his self-awareness, so it’s safe to say the irony has almost certainly passed him by.” But there is no question that BBC employees deliberately manipulated Trump’s remarks on January 6, 2021, to make it sound like he had encouraged violence. An independent outside auditor, Michael Prescott, wrote a major report on the BBC’s bias, which concluded that the BBC had “spliced together two clips” to create “the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.” Americans might think this story doesn’t concern them because it’s about a British media company. Few Americans listen to the BBC. But the story is highly relevant to Americans because US news media companies are guilty of manipulating their coverage of Trump, transgenderism, and race in nearly identical ways as the BBC. And given the BBC’s longstanding reputation as one of the most credible news organizations in the world, Prescott’s independent report has rightly sparked a major international media discussion. Over the weekend, the BBC’s CEO and its Director-General both stepped down. “The Future of the BBC is Now in Doubt,” writes Tim Stanley, an influential columnist, in the Daily Telegraph. Prescott’s report should inspire reform-minded owners of US news media companies to clean up their act. For example, CNN falsely claimed that January 6 was an “insurrection” that resulted in the deaths of five people and did a similarly manipulative edit of Trump’s speech, noted an investigator on X, MAZE. “It may not be technically as bad as what the BBC did,” he noted, “because there was a quick flash transition, but the goal was the same. Make the speech sound worse than it was. Take everything out of context and put it together in an order that makes it sound as bad as possible.” Last year, we criticized CNN and other news media for deliberately twisting the meaning of Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney for being a war hawk, and Prescott makes the same observation. “Mr. Trump was clearly criticising politicians who readily send US troops to war without thinking about the human cost,” he notes. And yet “the BBC repeatedly pushed this inaccurate version of what Trump said.” Readers of Public are aware that we have been critical of the BBC’s fact-checking program, “BBC Verify.” One purpose of BBC Verify appears to be to label stories with which the BBC disagrees as “misinformation” and thus as something that social media platforms should censor. Last year, the BBC’s Director General, Tim Davie, said, “Disinformation, propaganda, and partial news is [sic] weakening our shared understanding of the world, undermining trust in our institutions and our democratic process,” shortly after the BBC had buried a large package of investigative stories on the problems with giving children and adolescents puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. BBC’s first “disinformation” reporter, Mariana Spring, apologized in 2023 after she was caught lying on her resume. Spring remains employed at BBC as its “Social Media Investigations Senior Correspondent.” Prescott described how BBC Verify spread misinformation. “BBC audiences were being encouraged to believe Britain’s major insurers were, intentionally or unintentionally, racist and charging high prices to customers based on their ethnicity,” notes Prescott. “The central claim implied causation, (that being an ethnic minority resulted in you being charged more), but the reporting and commentary did not consider other issues that can affect insurance charges.” Adds Prescott, “the entire report was taken down, which I understand is very rare. It had taken six months for the BBC to take decisive action about a story that was not fit for purpose and spread damaging misinformation. As far as I know, no one has ever been disciplined for this hugely embarrassing episode and worrying questions remain.” Another example of the BBC’s bias concerned a major story about doctors causing serious harm to children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults. Readers of Public will recall that in the Spring of last year, we released documents, The WPATH Files, which a whistleblower had given to us. “In March 2024,” writes Prescott, “there was widespread media coverage of leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH] which raised concerns about the quality of care given to gender-distressed children. It was picked up by the Mail, Economist, Observer, Washington Post, the Times, and others, but not the BBC.” Prescott points out other examples of the BBC's censorship and bias on transgenderism. It refused to cover detransitioners, people who regretted taking hormones or receiving surgeries in an attempt to change their sex or gender. It didn’t cover a major lawsuit by a group of nurses after their hospital allowed a man to use their changing room. And, beyond WPATH, the BBC gave little to no coverage of the trans medical scandal, even though the UK government has banned puberty blockers. By contrast, the BBC produced “a surprisingly high number of stories about drag queens,” celebrated a male wrestler who competed in the women’s category, and published an article last year headlined, “Transgender woman guilty of rape after night out.” Wrote the reporter, “Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.” More information about the scandal may come out. Just today, Cath Leng, BBC’s former chief writer, says she was “forced out” in 2023 after 25 years because she was critical of transgender ideology. Prescott identified other areas of bias, including on race and the war in Gaza, all of which pointed to a single significant underlying problem. “My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all,” he writes. “Indeed, I would argue that the Executive’s attitude when confronted with evidence of serious and systemic problems is now a systemic problem in itself - meaning the last recourse for action is the Board.” All of this is deeply damaging to the BBC, regardless of whether Trump decides to sue it. “BBC staff have destroyed their own trump card in future negotiations over the licence fee,” writes Stanley at the Daily Telegraph. “The problem is this: in the modern, post-TV world, the licence fee is entirely unjustifiable. The BBC has to explain why, when there’s so much else available, it should be allowed to compel us to pay for it – just when tastes are diverging, national identity is fractured and the quality of the BBC’s output is in doubt…” What, then, explains the BBC’s fall from grace? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!$

It’s outrageous that President Donald Trump has threatened to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), say many in the media. “You have to admire the chutzpah,” wrote one columnist. “Donald Trump describing the BBC as ‘corrupt’ while threatening to take legal action….The man has never been known for his self-awareness, so it’s safe to say the irony has almost certainly passed him by.” But there is no question that BBC employees deliberately manipulated Trump’s remarks on January 6, 2021, to make it sound like he had encouraged violence. An independent outside auditor, Michael Prescott, wrote a major report on the BBC’s bias, which concluded that the BBC had “spliced together two clips” to create “the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.” Americans might think this story doesn’t concern them because it’s about a British media company. Few Americans listen to the BBC. But the story is highly relevant to Americans because US news media companies are guilty of manipulating their coverage of Trump, transgenderism, and race in nearly identical ways as the BBC. And given the BBC’s longstanding reputation as one of the most credible news organizations in the world, Prescott’s independent report has rightly sparked a major international media discussion. Over the weekend, the BBC’s CEO and its Director-General both stepped down. “The Future of the BBC is Now in Doubt,” writes Tim Stanley, an influential columnist, in the Daily Telegraph. Prescott’s report should inspire reform-minded owners of US news media companies to clean up their act. For example, CNN falsely claimed that January 6 was an “insurrection” that resulted in the deaths of five people and did a similarly manipulative edit of Trump’s speech, noted an investigator on X, MAZE. “It may not be technically as bad as what the BBC did,” he noted, “because there was a quick flash transition, but the goal was the same. Make the speech sound worse than it was. Take everything out of context and put it together in an order that makes it sound as bad as possible.” Last year, we criticized CNN and other news media for deliberately twisting the meaning of Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney for being a war hawk, and Prescott makes the same observation. “Mr. Trump was clearly criticising politicians who readily send US troops to war without thinking about the human cost,” he notes. And yet “the BBC repeatedly pushed this inaccurate version of what Trump said.” Readers of Public are aware that we have been critical of the BBC’s fact-checking program, “BBC Verify.” One purpose of BBC Verify appears to be to label stories with which the BBC disagrees as “misinformation” and thus as something that social media platforms should censor. Last year, the BBC’s Director General, Tim Davie, said, “Disinformation, propaganda, and partial news is [sic] weakening our shared understanding of the world, undermining trust in our institutions and our democratic process,” shortly after the BBC had buried a large package of investigative stories on the problems with giving children and adolescents puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. BBC’s first “disinformation” reporter, Mariana Spring, apologized in 2023 after she was caught lying on her resume. Spring remains employed at BBC as its “Social Media Investigations Senior Correspondent.” Prescott described how BBC Verify spread misinformation. “BBC audiences were being encouraged to believe Britain’s major insurers were, intentionally or unintentionally, racist and charging high prices to customers based on their ethnicity,” notes Prescott. “The central claim implied causation, (that being an ethnic minority resulted in you being charged more), but the reporting and commentary did not consider other issues that can affect insurance charges.” Adds Prescott, “the entire report was taken down, which I understand is very rare. It had taken six months for the BBC to take decisive action about a story that was not fit for purpose and spread damaging misinformation. As far as I know, no one has ever been disciplined for this hugely embarrassing episode and worrying questions remain.” Another example of the BBC’s bias concerned a major story about doctors causing serious harm to children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults. Readers of Public will recall that in the Spring of last year, we released documents, The WPATH Files, which a whistleblower had given to us. “In March 2024,” writes Prescott, “there was widespread media coverage of leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH] which raised concerns about the quality of care given to gender-distressed children. It was picked up by the Mail, Economist, Observer, Washington Post, the Times, and others, but not the BBC.” Prescott points out other examples of the BBC's censorship and bias on transgenderism. It refused to cover detransitioners, people who regretted taking hormones or receiving surgeries in an attempt to change their sex or gender. It didn’t cover a major lawsuit by a group of nurses after their hospital allowed a man to use their changing room. And, beyond WPATH, the BBC gave little to no coverage of the trans medical scandal, even though the UK government has banned puberty blockers. By contrast, the BBC produced “a surprisingly high number of stories about drag queens,” celebrated a male wrestler who competed in the women’s category, and published an article last year headlined, “Transgender woman guilty of rape after night out.” Wrote the reporter, “Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.” More information about the scandal may come out. Just today, Cath Leng, BBC’s former chief writer, says she was “forced out” in 2023 after 25 years because she was critical of transgender ideology. Prescott identified other areas of bias, including on race and the war in Gaza, all of which pointed to a single significant underlying problem. “My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all,” he writes. “Indeed, I would argue that the Executive’s attitude when confronted with evidence of serious and systemic problems is now a systemic problem in itself - meaning the last recourse for action is the Board.” All of this is deeply damaging to the BBC, regardless of whether Trump decides to sue it. “BBC staff have destroyed their own trump card in future negotiations over the licence fee,” writes Stanley at the Daily Telegraph. “The problem is this: in the modern, post-TV world, the licence fee is entirely unjustifiable. The BBC has to explain why, when there’s so much else available, it should be allowed to compel us to pay for it – just when tastes are diverging, national identity is fractured and the quality of the BBC’s output is in doubt…” What, then, explains the BBC’s fall from grace? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

43,703 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

UH OH 😱 Sophie Cunningham has now inspired a movement‼️ Cheryl Reeve the head coach of the Minnesota Lynx isn’t too happy about the Pro Sophie Cunningham rally scheduled to take place outside of their game against the Indiana Fever on Sunday. "The narrative that I think is problematic is too suggest that, number one, that transgender athletes are the biggest problem in sports... there's a faction of people in our country that are making this a massive issue.” Yes and that faction of people happens to be mentally ill men pretending to be little girls. And of course the hordes of mentally ill women who support them. Normal people who don’t think men should be competing against women are not the problem. Notice how none of these issues ever existed until the left decided one day that gender was no longer a thing. You would think that a women’s sports league would have interest in protecting women but that’s obviously not the case with the WNBA at all. If anything the WNBA seems hell bent on destroying their own success because they’re upset that two straight white women are the only reason why anyone’s even watching right now.

UH OH 😱 Sophie Cunningham has now inspired a movement‼️ Cheryl Reeve the head coach of the Minnesota Lynx isn’t too happy about the Pro Sophie Cunningham rally scheduled to take place outside of their game against the Indiana Fever on Sunday. "The narrative that I think is problematic is too suggest that, number one, that transgender athletes are the biggest problem in sports... there's a faction of people in our country that are making this a massive issue.” Yes and that faction of people happens to be mentally ill men pretending to be little girls. And of course the hordes of mentally ill women who support them. Normal people who don’t think men should be competing against women are not the problem. Notice how none of these issues ever existed until the left decided one day that gender was no longer a thing. You would think that a women’s sports league would have interest in protecting women but that’s obviously not the case with the WNBA at all. If anything the WNBA seems hell bent on destroying their own success because they’re upset that two straight white women are the only reason why anyone’s even watching right now.

Cinema Shogun

124,955 просмотров • 25 дней назад

The man who manages $11 trillion just said two words that should terrify every person on the planet. "Global recession." Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, the largest asset manager in human history sat down with the BBC and laid out the scenarios. Fink told the BBC there are only two possible outcomes for the global economy right now. His exact words: "There's not going to be an outcome that's somewhere in the middle." Outcome one is that Iran gets reintegrated into the global community, sanctions ease and Iranian oil and Venezuelan oil flood back into markets. Then the oil drops below $40 a barrel, the world gets relief. Outcome two is that Iran remains a threat, the Strait of Hormuz stays disrupted and the standoff stretches on for years. Oil stays above $100 and pushes toward $150. The result? A "stark and steep global recession." Why does $150 oil collapse the world economy? Because oil is embedded in everything. Food production, shipping, manufacturing, heating., fertilizer, chemicals and plastics. When oil spikes, prices spike across every single category of human life. Central banks raise rates to fight inflation, businesses freeze investment and consumers stop spending. Also, jobs disappear, GDP craters and the cycle feeds itself. There is no bailout for this and no rate cut fixes an energy shock. Fink also made a point that high oil prices are a "very regressive tax." The wealthy absorb higher energy costs while the poor cannot. This hits grocery bills, rent, and transportation everything the bottom half of the global population depends on to survive. The market is still pricing in hope, a resolution, a deal, a ceasefire. Fink is pricing in reality, two extremes, and the clock is running. Pay attention to this one.

The man who manages $11 trillion just said two words that should terrify every person on the planet. "Global recession." Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, the largest asset manager in human history sat down with the BBC and laid out the scenarios. Fink told the BBC there are only two possible outcomes for the global economy right now. His exact words: "There's not going to be an outcome that's somewhere in the middle." Outcome one is that Iran gets reintegrated into the global community, sanctions ease and Iranian oil and Venezuelan oil flood back into markets. Then the oil drops below $40 a barrel, the world gets relief. Outcome two is that Iran remains a threat, the Strait of Hormuz stays disrupted and the standoff stretches on for years. Oil stays above $100 and pushes toward $150. The result? A "stark and steep global recession." Why does $150 oil collapse the world economy? Because oil is embedded in everything. Food production, shipping, manufacturing, heating., fertilizer, chemicals and plastics. When oil spikes, prices spike across every single category of human life. Central banks raise rates to fight inflation, businesses freeze investment and consumers stop spending. Also, jobs disappear, GDP craters and the cycle feeds itself. There is no bailout for this and no rate cut fixes an energy shock. Fink also made a point that high oil prices are a "very regressive tax." The wealthy absorb higher energy costs while the poor cannot. This hits grocery bills, rent, and transportation everything the bottom half of the global population depends on to survive. The market is still pricing in hope, a resolution, a deal, a ceasefire. Fink is pricing in reality, two extremes, and the clock is running. Pay attention to this one.

StockMarket.News

815,827 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A production company named Meditel Productions devoted 3 years to the making of this BBC Documentary that never aired because of political pressure. They were given a testing budget and brought in world renowned scientists to properly conduct the scientific tests needed to prove their theory, that HIV has never been isolated, a direct threat to the orthodoxy that by then had already been deeply entrenched within the medical industrial complex and the culture at large. It was to be a one hour exposé to be aired on World AIDS day 1998. The channel 4 news editor started to get cold feet and said they would only broadcast a 10 minute report that day, something that didn’t sit well with the production company. The day before the transmission, the editor Jim Gray said he has a “tectonic shift” and refused to broadcast the report. In this thread I have provided a screenshot of the press release from Meditel announcing the project and one that condemns the censorship of the broadcast. I have also included a link for the extra skeptical out there to an archive of the correspondence between Meditel and the BBC. It proves the sad story about the film that never aired on television. Until now and I think once you have viewed this, you will understand why it has been censored for 25 years. I don’t claim to know the absolute truth in regards to this matter but the evidence presented is extremely compelling. While watching this I found that it has eerily similar parallels with how COVID has been handled. Judge for yourself.

A production company named Meditel Productions devoted 3 years to the making of this BBC Documentary that never aired because of political pressure. They were given a testing budget and brought in world renowned scientists to properly conduct the scientific tests needed to prove their theory, that HIV has never been isolated, a direct threat to the orthodoxy that by then had already been deeply entrenched within the medical industrial complex and the culture at large. It was to be a one hour exposé to be aired on World AIDS day 1998. The channel 4 news editor started to get cold feet and said they would only broadcast a 10 minute report that day, something that didn’t sit well with the production company. The day before the transmission, the editor Jim Gray said he has a “tectonic shift” and refused to broadcast the report. In this thread I have provided a screenshot of the press release from Meditel announcing the project and one that condemns the censorship of the broadcast. I have also included a link for the extra skeptical out there to an archive of the correspondence between Meditel and the BBC. It proves the sad story about the film that never aired on television. Until now and I think once you have viewed this, you will understand why it has been censored for 25 years. I don’t claim to know the absolute truth in regards to this matter but the evidence presented is extremely compelling. While watching this I found that it has eerily similar parallels with how COVID has been handled. Judge for yourself.

Champagne Joshi

401,698 просмотров • 3 лет назад

BREAKING: Joe Biden is readying a SWEEPING Executive Order to curb migrant arrivals as soon as tomorrow, according to the CBS and BBC. Here's everything you need to know: Swift Deportations: Under the proposed order, US officials could quickly deport migrants who enter illegally without processing their asylum requests once a daily threshold is reached (CBS). Limiting Arrivals: This measure aims to limit the number of migrant arrivals, according to three unnamed sources briefed on the order (CBS). Legal Basis: Reports indicate Biden is considering using a 1952 law (212(f)) that allows the president to restrict access to the American asylum system. Historical Use: The same law was used by the Trump administration to ban immigration from several predominantly Muslim countries and to bar migrants from asylum if apprehended crossing illegally. Asylum Processing: Asylum processing at ports of entry is expected to continue, with about 1,500 asylum seekers processed daily, mostly through the CBP One app. Political Reactions: Mayors of several border towns, including Brownsville and Edinburg, Texas, are expected in Washington for the announcement. Potential Challenges: The proposal is likely to face court challenges from immigration advocates or Republican-led states. Call me crazy but it seems like Biden is the only one who really wants to fix this problem while everyone else appears to use this as a political tool.

BREAKING: Joe Biden is readying a SWEEPING Executive Order to curb migrant arrivals as soon as tomorrow, according to the CBS and BBC. Here's everything you need to know: Swift Deportations: Under the proposed order, US officials could quickly deport migrants who enter illegally without processing their asylum requests once a daily threshold is reached (CBS). Limiting Arrivals: This measure aims to limit the number of migrant arrivals, according to three unnamed sources briefed on the order (CBS). Legal Basis: Reports indicate Biden is considering using a 1952 law (212(f)) that allows the president to restrict access to the American asylum system. Historical Use: The same law was used by the Trump administration to ban immigration from several predominantly Muslim countries and to bar migrants from asylum if apprehended crossing illegally. Asylum Processing: Asylum processing at ports of entry is expected to continue, with about 1,500 asylum seekers processed daily, mostly through the CBP One app. Political Reactions: Mayors of several border towns, including Brownsville and Edinburg, Texas, are expected in Washington for the announcement. Potential Challenges: The proposal is likely to face court challenges from immigration advocates or Republican-led states. Call me crazy but it seems like Biden is the only one who really wants to fix this problem while everyone else appears to use this as a political tool.

Brian Krassenstein

1,222,765 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Saudi oil is burning, Hormuz is choked, the Red Sea is closed, and the United States has itself to blame. Steve Hanke, a Johns Hopkins professor and one of the most followed economists on X, pulls no punches: "Trump has actually himself closed 2 of the 8 important straits in the world. The Strait of Hormuz was open before we waged war. That's a war of choice on them." Prof. Hanke believes we will end up with the Iranians permanently managing the strait, and draws a historical comparison to Turkey managing the Bosphorus and Dardanelles since 1936. He says the inflation genie is out of the bottle, the Fed cannot put it back, and diesel, jet fuel, and gasoline are all feeding a structural price problem that predates the war and is now being made dramatically worse. On tariffs, sanctions, and interventionism: "This is a good way to make lots of enemies and put sand in the gears of commerce," and he sees no coherent plan from Trump, just ad hoc decisions made in real time. Then there's the wheat story nobody is covering, the grain corridor out of Odessa being shut down, Russian gloves coming off, European sanctions backfiring on European manufacturing, all of it pointing to a food crisis that oil headlines are crowding out... We've only begun to see the consequences of this war. Thanks for making the time, Steve Hanke

Saudi oil is burning, Hormuz is choked, the Red Sea is closed, and the United States has itself to blame. Steve Hanke, a Johns Hopkins professor and one of the most followed economists on X, pulls no punches: "Trump has actually himself closed 2 of the 8 important straits in the world. The Strait of Hormuz was open before we waged war. That's a war of choice on them." Prof. Hanke believes we will end up with the Iranians permanently managing the strait, and draws a historical comparison to Turkey managing the Bosphorus and Dardanelles since 1936. He says the inflation genie is out of the bottle, the Fed cannot put it back, and diesel, jet fuel, and gasoline are all feeding a structural price problem that predates the war and is now being made dramatically worse. On tariffs, sanctions, and interventionism: "This is a good way to make lots of enemies and put sand in the gears of commerce," and he sees no coherent plan from Trump, just ad hoc decisions made in real time. Then there's the wheat story nobody is covering, the grain corridor out of Odessa being shut down, Russian gloves coming off, European sanctions backfiring on European manufacturing, all of it pointing to a food crisis that oil headlines are crowding out... We've only begun to see the consequences of this war. Thanks for making the time, Steve Hanke

Mario Nawfal

300,207 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: The entire media class is re‑laundering the genocidal atrocity propaganda rape hoax via an Israeli regime "Civil Commission" report the BBC calls "the most comprehensive to date". There's just one problem: Cochav Elkayam‑Levy set up that "commission" and is a proven propagandist liar and fraud. Early in the rape hoax she came out swinging with the most maximalist deranged hoax claims, producing a "photo showing women raped and killed" that was exposed by Max Blumenthal to have been of Kurdish women in Syria. She repeated the debunked ZAKA hoax claims of fetuses cut from wombs, which was so embarrassing that the Israeli regime's official rape hoaxer in charge of their propaganda operation, Ruth Halperin‑Kaddari, came out in a Times of London piece to denounce Levy as a grifter and hoaxer who should not be taken seriously, and say that she herself had cut off all contact with her because her blatant hoaxes and grifting jeopardized the entire propaganda project. Israeli media itself then ran reports exposing Levy as a fraud, having lied about having written a "report" to get an official position as a rape hoax official, and raked in cash for her "Civil Commission" which in fact was doing nothing at all and was just comprised of herself sitting in her home doing Google searches for insane rape hoax claims to put in a Google Doc. This is now the "Civil Commission" that has a BBC front‑page story laundering it, as well as Le Monde, ABC, CNN, soon to be followed by more. All of this is on the record. I and others noted this over a year ago. It's published in the Times of London. Everyone knows Levy is a grifter who lied and stole money for the fake "Civil Commission", funneling it into her own pockets. Everyone knows she's a serial propagandist liar who fabricates photos and repeats fetuses cut from wombs hoaxes with glee. And she just put out the most maximalist insane deranged rape hoax "report" that is debunked explicitly in all its claims by all the UN reports, both Patten and the UN CoI, the Amnesty report, the HRW report, and even the Israeli regime's own prior Kaddari "Dinah Project" report, which excludes all the most blatant rape hoaxes that Levy just dumped in there with glee. So the Israeli regime is actually promoting two different reports from competing rape hoax "commissions" that contradict each other! No, actually, they're promoting at least 3 or 4 different reports when you also include the Patten and UN CoI that all contradict one another!! And you know what the BBC does in its front‑page write‑up of it by Yolande Knell? They say: "While the UN and others have published reports on sexual violence during the attacks – in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage – this is the most comprehensive." They don't even bother reviewing its claims versus the other reports, including the UN ones that they herald as the gold standard in all their pieces and the Israeli regime's competing "official" Dinah one that they also gleefully laundered, and just say: OMG HERE IS THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE BEST ONE YET!!!! What the fuck are you talking about? THIS CONTRADICTS ALL THE OTHERS. IT REGURGITATES ALL THE MOST INSANE DEBUNKED HOAX CLAIMS AS DETERMINED BY THE OTHERS WHO LOOKED AT THE EXACT SAME MATERIAL. You can't even argue that because this one was just published they have some new information that no one else saw before. No, it's literally the exact same hoax claims that all these reports went over in detail and determined had no merit whatsoever, and that's by their already insane charitable to the rape hoax standards, as I and others have pointed out with regard to the Patten report (the UN CoI reports, also overly charitable, are the least worst). It is actually astonishing to me. After I saw the Daily Mail give it a write‑up yesterday, I now see that the BBC, ABC, Le Monde, CNN and soon likely NYT and Guardian actually also jumped on this. The Israeli regime's Foreign Ministry hasbara division proudly posted the Daily Mail piece and I thought for sure it would remain restricted to the tabloid rags. I thought for sure they would not have the shame to actually dare publish as a front‑page piece in the BBC. But of course even I at this point underestimated just how shameless these depraved genocidal Zionist scum in the media class are, and how owned they are by their Zionist masters. It actually is amazing. They are totally owned. Of course what this proves beyond all doubt is that the entire rape hoax, from start to finish, is nothing but a genocidal propaganda project. They just admitted it. The BBC, ABC, CNN, Le Monde, they just all came out and admitted it, that they only published what the Israeli regime and the lobby demanded they publish without any attempt to even do the most minimal factual review or care about the most basic journalistic standards. They just admitted it. It's shocking.

BREAKING: The entire media class is re‑laundering the genocidal atrocity propaganda rape hoax via an Israeli regime "Civil Commission" report the BBC calls "the most comprehensive to date". There's just one problem: Cochav Elkayam‑Levy set up that "commission" and is a proven propagandist liar and fraud. Early in the rape hoax she came out swinging with the most maximalist deranged hoax claims, producing a "photo showing women raped and killed" that was exposed by Max Blumenthal to have been of Kurdish women in Syria. She repeated the debunked ZAKA hoax claims of fetuses cut from wombs, which was so embarrassing that the Israeli regime's official rape hoaxer in charge of their propaganda operation, Ruth Halperin‑Kaddari, came out in a Times of London piece to denounce Levy as a grifter and hoaxer who should not be taken seriously, and say that she herself had cut off all contact with her because her blatant hoaxes and grifting jeopardized the entire propaganda project. Israeli media itself then ran reports exposing Levy as a fraud, having lied about having written a "report" to get an official position as a rape hoax official, and raked in cash for her "Civil Commission" which in fact was doing nothing at all and was just comprised of herself sitting in her home doing Google searches for insane rape hoax claims to put in a Google Doc. This is now the "Civil Commission" that has a BBC front‑page story laundering it, as well as Le Monde, ABC, CNN, soon to be followed by more. All of this is on the record. I and others noted this over a year ago. It's published in the Times of London. Everyone knows Levy is a grifter who lied and stole money for the fake "Civil Commission", funneling it into her own pockets. Everyone knows she's a serial propagandist liar who fabricates photos and repeats fetuses cut from wombs hoaxes with glee. And she just put out the most maximalist insane deranged rape hoax "report" that is debunked explicitly in all its claims by all the UN reports, both Patten and the UN CoI, the Amnesty report, the HRW report, and even the Israeli regime's own prior Kaddari "Dinah Project" report, which excludes all the most blatant rape hoaxes that Levy just dumped in there with glee. So the Israeli regime is actually promoting two different reports from competing rape hoax "commissions" that contradict each other! No, actually, they're promoting at least 3 or 4 different reports when you also include the Patten and UN CoI that all contradict one another!! And you know what the BBC does in its front‑page write‑up of it by Yolande Knell? They say: "While the UN and others have published reports on sexual violence during the attacks – in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage – this is the most comprehensive." They don't even bother reviewing its claims versus the other reports, including the UN ones that they herald as the gold standard in all their pieces and the Israeli regime's competing "official" Dinah one that they also gleefully laundered, and just say: OMG HERE IS THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE BEST ONE YET!!!! What the fuck are you talking about? THIS CONTRADICTS ALL THE OTHERS. IT REGURGITATES ALL THE MOST INSANE DEBUNKED HOAX CLAIMS AS DETERMINED BY THE OTHERS WHO LOOKED AT THE EXACT SAME MATERIAL. You can't even argue that because this one was just published they have some new information that no one else saw before. No, it's literally the exact same hoax claims that all these reports went over in detail and determined had no merit whatsoever, and that's by their already insane charitable to the rape hoax standards, as I and others have pointed out with regard to the Patten report (the UN CoI reports, also overly charitable, are the least worst). It is actually astonishing to me. After I saw the Daily Mail give it a write‑up yesterday, I now see that the BBC, ABC, Le Monde, CNN and soon likely NYT and Guardian actually also jumped on this. The Israeli regime's Foreign Ministry hasbara division proudly posted the Daily Mail piece and I thought for sure it would remain restricted to the tabloid rags. I thought for sure they would not have the shame to actually dare publish as a front‑page piece in the BBC. But of course even I at this point underestimated just how shameless these depraved genocidal Zionist scum in the media class are, and how owned they are by their Zionist masters. It actually is amazing. They are totally owned. Of course what this proves beyond all doubt is that the entire rape hoax, from start to finish, is nothing but a genocidal propaganda project. They just admitted it. The BBC, ABC, CNN, Le Monde, they just all came out and admitted it, that they only published what the Israeli regime and the lobby demanded they publish without any attempt to even do the most minimal factual review or care about the most basic journalistic standards. They just admitted it. It's shocking.

☀️👀

206,122 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

😳 Extraordinary Bust-Up: Zia Yusuf vs Fiona Bruce in Fiery BBC Audience Bias Row! Zia Yusuf just went head-to-head with Fiona Bruce in a heated clash over Question Time audience bias and he refused to back down! After only 4 hands went up for Reform (rising to just 8 on a recount), Zia said: “This is interesting given that Reform is averaging 28% in the polls.” He called it “no way close to representative.” Fiona pushed back, saying there’s more than that in the audience but they’re just not putting their hands up. Zia fired straight back: “Ok. We’ll all just have to take the BBC’s word for that.” Fiona insisted: “We are scrupulous making sure that our audience is politically representative.” Zia doubled down: “And we all just have to take the BBC’s word for that.” Fiona, clearly annoyed: “Well I’m certainly not lying about it!” Zia stood his ground: “Fiona, with respect, where’s the evidence for that? You just made an important claim, you appealed to authority, which is the BBC, so you should believe us, but where’s the evidence for it?” Fiona replied that everybody is checked, questioned and interviewed before they are picked, but “not everyone wants to put their hand up and show their political allegiance on national television.” Zia wasn’t convinced: “Ok. Which is why I just said we’ve got to take the BBC’s word for it which you agree with.” Fiona’s last word: “And I’m happy to do so.” You may be happy to do so Fiona but Zia and millions more are not. We don’t trust the BBC one bit. I’m glad Zia called this out and refused to back down.

😳 Extraordinary Bust-Up: Zia Yusuf vs Fiona Bruce in Fiery BBC Audience Bias Row! Zia Yusuf just went head-to-head with Fiona Bruce in a heated clash over Question Time audience bias and he refused to back down! After only 4 hands went up for Reform (rising to just 8 on a recount), Zia said: “This is interesting given that Reform is averaging 28% in the polls.” He called it “no way close to representative.” Fiona pushed back, saying there’s more than that in the audience but they’re just not putting their hands up. Zia fired straight back: “Ok. We’ll all just have to take the BBC’s word for that.” Fiona insisted: “We are scrupulous making sure that our audience is politically representative.” Zia doubled down: “And we all just have to take the BBC’s word for that.” Fiona, clearly annoyed: “Well I’m certainly not lying about it!” Zia stood his ground: “Fiona, with respect, where’s the evidence for that? You just made an important claim, you appealed to authority, which is the BBC, so you should believe us, but where’s the evidence for it?” Fiona replied that everybody is checked, questioned and interviewed before they are picked, but “not everyone wants to put their hand up and show their political allegiance on national television.” Zia wasn’t convinced: “Ok. Which is why I just said we’ve got to take the BBC’s word for it which you agree with.” Fiona’s last word: “And I’m happy to do so.” You may be happy to do so Fiona but Zia and millions more are not. We don’t trust the BBC one bit. I’m glad Zia called this out and refused to back down.

J Stewart

702,001 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Years ago when I was recruiting for Cornell, I remember watching a preseason game in Western Canada with Brett Larson, now the Head Coach at St. Cloud. The game we were watching was turning into a bit of a blowout in the second period and wasn’t going to be a great evaluation so we got into talking some hockey. Just an unreal hockey mind and a great coach. At one point he goes to me - “Watch every time a team makes 3 passes in a row and see what happens…” I was like OK, not thinking much of it. But then as we keep talking and I’m watching, very rarely are there three passes being made on the tape in a row. It’s a dump, someone tries to beat someone one on one, it’s a turnover, etc… And then finally BOOM three passes in a row - and there’s a scoring chance. Go a little while longer, not a ton of plays being made and then BOOM again - three passes on the tape in a row and there’s a scoring chance. It didn’t happen often, but when it did…offensive chances and goals were created. It was like clockwork. PASSING is the most underrated and under-worked-on skill in hockey. Hockey is a TEAM game and when I watch the game, especially at the youth levels, the team that passes the puck better typically wins. We need to prioritize it more with our kids…BIG TIME. This goal is an incredible example. Just flawless execution of passing, making the game look so beautiful. What a display of hockey sense, support, puck protection, and poise. I know there’s a lot of coaches out there on social media working their ass off to create content. Only problem is, 90% of the content I see from skills coaches on social media have zero passing in them. The kids are seeing dangles, tight turns, spins, etc…but they aren’t seeing what is going to make them an actual “hockey player”. High level scouts today are telling us all the time they’re seeing a ton of skilled players…who just don’t understand the game. They can all do “The Michigan”, they have incredible speed and hands…but they struggle to make plays or play as part of a unit. Working on skills is important - but let’s make sure that we don’t forget the one most important for playing a team game. If we get back to that, we’ll see a lot more goals like this one in the future.

Years ago when I was recruiting for Cornell, I remember watching a preseason game in Western Canada with Brett Larson, now the Head Coach at St. Cloud. The game we were watching was turning into a bit of a blowout in the second period and wasn’t going to be a great evaluation so we got into talking some hockey. Just an unreal hockey mind and a great coach. At one point he goes to me - “Watch every time a team makes 3 passes in a row and see what happens…” I was like OK, not thinking much of it. But then as we keep talking and I’m watching, very rarely are there three passes being made on the tape in a row. It’s a dump, someone tries to beat someone one on one, it’s a turnover, etc… And then finally BOOM three passes in a row - and there’s a scoring chance. Go a little while longer, not a ton of plays being made and then BOOM again - three passes on the tape in a row and there’s a scoring chance. It didn’t happen often, but when it did…offensive chances and goals were created. It was like clockwork. PASSING is the most underrated and under-worked-on skill in hockey. Hockey is a TEAM game and when I watch the game, especially at the youth levels, the team that passes the puck better typically wins. We need to prioritize it more with our kids…BIG TIME. This goal is an incredible example. Just flawless execution of passing, making the game look so beautiful. What a display of hockey sense, support, puck protection, and poise. I know there’s a lot of coaches out there on social media working their ass off to create content. Only problem is, 90% of the content I see from skills coaches on social media have zero passing in them. The kids are seeing dangles, tight turns, spins, etc…but they aren’t seeing what is going to make them an actual “hockey player”. High level scouts today are telling us all the time they’re seeing a ton of skilled players…who just don’t understand the game. They can all do “The Michigan”, they have incredible speed and hands…but they struggle to make plays or play as part of a unit. Working on skills is important - but let’s make sure that we don’t forget the one most important for playing a team game. If we get back to that, we’ll see a lot more goals like this one in the future.

Topher Scott

87,452 просмотров • 1 год назад

This pixar-style animated Lymphoria liver ad has been printing for 58 days as the #1 top-performing ad at scale because it took an invisible internal problem and turned it into a detestable cartoon villain you actively want to defeat. Plus the fact that it's still scaling in the supplement space (which is the most ruthless, fatigue-prone vertical there is) tells me the underlying psychology is so dialed in that the algorithm just keeps feeding it new audiences without burning out. Let me break this down piece by piece so you understand what's actually happening here. (If you’re interested in making pixar-style animated ads like this, DM me ‘PIXAR’) Initially, the hook makes the invisible enemy visible. "Liver Congestion" personified as a yellow, lumpy little villain saying "nothing flows, nothing heals." This isn't generic "support your liver health" bullshit. This is the entire problem most supplement brands struggle with, solved in 3 seconds. And the people who see this hook are: ⦁ Already worried about their organ health ⦁ Already frustrated by supplements that don't work ⦁ Already aware something is off but can't see it If you've ever felt that dull ache under your ribs and didn't know what it was, you're stopping your scroll right here. This is textbook problem-aware messaging for an INVISIBLE problem, which is the hardest thing to pull off in supplements. Most brands try to show a doctor in a white coat and lose. These guys gave the disease a face and made you hate it. Then, they do something most brands are too scared to try. They take down the competitors by name. ⦁ Milk Thistle (can't help when drainage is blocked) ⦁ Detox Tea (just makes you run to the bathroom) ⦁ NAC (boosts glutathione but misses drainage) Why does this work so well? Because it's: ⦁ Specific (real products people have already tried) ⦁ Empathetic (you weren't stupid, the products were incomplete) ⦁ Educational (here's the biological reason why they failed) Where most brands say "we're better than the rest" and nobody believes them, These guys are saying "here's exactly why what you tried before couldn't work" and that's a completely different conversation. This is the "throw rocks at their enemies" framework executed at the highest level. And that builds insane trust before you've even pitched your product. It also introduces a brand new mechanism. Drainage. This is the epiphany bridge. You're shifting the entire conversation from "protect your liver" to "drain your liver" and now they're the only ones selling that solution. That's how you escape the supplement commodity trap. Another thing is the ingredients are personified as ACTIONS, not features. ⦁ Red Clover physically pushes through blocks ⦁ Stillingia drains lymphatic buildup with long roots ⦁ Cleavers vacuums smaller congestion pieces ⦁ Prickly Ash clears remaining blockages Instead of just listing ingredients and percentages like every other supplement brand, these guys are SHOWING the ingredients doing the work. Because when you watch Red Clover physically shove a yellow congestion blob out of the way, your brain stops asking "does this work?" and starts asking "where do I buy this?" This is also why the retention rates on this video are crushing. Every 2-3 seconds there's a new character, a new action, a new visual. Your dopamine doesn't have time to drop. You can't scroll because you want to see what happens next. Then they drop a sniper-level pain callout. "Aching liver enzymes under their ribs." That's not a generic "feel better" claim. That's a hyper-specific physical sensation that people with actual liver issues experience. This is dog-whistle copy. When you describe someone's exact physical pain better than they can describe it themselves, their brain automatically assumes you have the solution. Most brands write copy that could apply to anyone. This line could only apply to someone who actually has the problem. Another upside is, the back-end conversion mechanics are airtight. ⦁ 60-day guarantee (removes the "another failed supplement" objection) ⦁ 43,000 people (turns it from gamble to mainstream) ⦁ 40% off (urgency to click now, not later) By the time you hit the landing page, every objection has been pre-handled inside the creative itself. That's why the conversion rate stays high. It's built for cold traffic too. This ad works on people who've never heard of Lymphoria because: ⦁ Visualizes a problem they couldn't see before ⦁ Validates every failed thing they've tried ⦁ Introduces a completely new mechanism (drainage) That's why it scales without burning out. It's not dependent on brand recognition as the creative does all the heavy lifting. So what should you steal from this? If you're selling supplements or any internal health product: 1. Personify the problem (give the disease a face) 2. Take down competitors by name (with biological reasoning, not just bashing) 3. Introduce a new mechanism the category isn't using yet 4. Show ingredients as ACTIONS, not features 5. Use hyper-specific physical pain callouts 6. Stack risk reversal + social proof + urgency on the back end 7. Build retention with a new character every 2-3 seconds 8. Stop running boring "doctor in a white coat" creative If your supplement ads are still listing ingredients with bullet points and showing stock footage of healthy people jogging, you're getting destroyed by ads like this that turn the problem into a movie villain and your product into the hero that defeats it. This ad works because it doesn't sell a supplement. It sells a story where the buyer is the protagonist who finally figures out why nothing else worked. Most ads try to convince. This one just tells a story so good that the buyer convinces themselves. That's why it's been running for 58 days as their top converting ad at scale.

Nick Theriot

15,497 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Members of the Pakistani Rape Gangs are active members of the Labour Party. Heroin dealers and Islamists wear red rosettes. One is even a convicted kidnapper who tortured one of his victims by inserting a broomstick in his anus and filming the ordeal. A cop killer’s getaway driver openly campaigns for Labour politicians and threatens violence on those that oppose the Labour Party. Yet when it comes to this, including how a local Labour Party MP continues to openly support a convicted child rapist, Lucy Powell has nothing to say. We see you and your dog whistle Powell. And for those that have asked me, yes I will be campaigning alongside Pakistani rape gang survivors and their families in Denton and Gorton in support of Matt Goodwin. Justice is coming. ————- I need your help. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs and helped force a national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. I document everything: - the evidence - the cover-ups - the intimidation - the fight for justice All of it lives in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. Supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year): 👉 If you can’t do monthly, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive: 👉 👉 This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. Raja 🙏

Members of the Pakistani Rape Gangs are active members of the Labour Party. Heroin dealers and Islamists wear red rosettes. One is even a convicted kidnapper who tortured one of his victims by inserting a broomstick in his anus and filming the ordeal. A cop killer’s getaway driver openly campaigns for Labour politicians and threatens violence on those that oppose the Labour Party. Yet when it comes to this, including how a local Labour Party MP continues to openly support a convicted child rapist, Lucy Powell has nothing to say. We see you and your dog whistle Powell. And for those that have asked me, yes I will be campaigning alongside Pakistani rape gang survivors and their families in Denton and Gorton in support of Matt Goodwin. Justice is coming. ————- I need your help. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs and helped force a national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. I document everything: - the evidence - the cover-ups - the intimidation - the fight for justice All of it lives in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. Supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year): 👉 If you can’t do monthly, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive: 👉 👉 This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

94,331 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад