正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

These $35k drones execute an 80-degree death dive giving air defenses zero time to react. They can even be equipped with an anti-tank warhead that fires a molten metal slug straight through heavy armor. Tanks are obsolete.

Furkan Gözükara

192,855 subscribers

19,173 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

WHY MODERN TANK SHELLS MELT ARMOR LIKE BUTTER Even with 100+mm of solid steel, tanks still get shredded - because today’s anti-tank rounds don’t break armor, they obliterate it. Back in WWII, tungsten-tipped shells traveling 3,000+ ft/s turned Shermans into Swiss cheese, but modern threats are worse. Shaped charges use explosive force to form a jet of molten metal at hypersonic speed, slicing straight through armor like a plasma knife. Then there’s the fin-stabilized discarding sabot - a dart made of tungsten or depleted uranium that sheds its shell mid-flight, slamming into tanks with such pressure it vaporizes armor and sprays superheated metal inside. Source: de1ifacts6

WHY MODERN TANK SHELLS MELT ARMOR LIKE BUTTER Even with 100+mm of solid steel, tanks still get shredded - because today’s anti-tank rounds don’t break armor, they obliterate it. Back in WWII, tungsten-tipped shells traveling 3,000+ ft/s turned Shermans into Swiss cheese, but modern threats are worse. Shaped charges use explosive force to form a jet of molten metal at hypersonic speed, slicing straight through armor like a plasma knife. Then there’s the fin-stabilized discarding sabot - a dart made of tungsten or depleted uranium that sheds its shell mid-flight, slamming into tanks with such pressure it vaporizes armor and sprays superheated metal inside. Source: de1ifacts6

Mario Nawfal

423,327 次观看 • 1 年前

The Ukraine war has made obvious that the era of tank warfare is now over. If a $500 drone can kiII a $10 million tank ... tanks are obsolete and won't be built. Next up? Naval ships. Imagine 1,000 drones (cost $500,000) sinking an Aircraft Carrier ($13 billion). China knows.

The Ukraine war has made obvious that the era of tank warfare is now over. If a $500 drone can kiII a $10 million tank ... tanks are obsolete and won't be built. Next up? Naval ships. Imagine 1,000 drones (cost $500,000) sinking an Aircraft Carrier ($13 billion). China knows.

Wall Street Mav

5,644,570 次观看 • 2 年前

NEW: 🇮🇱🇱🇧For the first time, Hezbollah has took out an IDF Merkava Mk. 4 with a FPV drone. A Hezbollah FPV flies right into the anti-drone cage, which does nothing to prevent an ammunition cookoff, likely destroying the tank. Israeli media are now reporting that Israel is withdrawing several battalions due to heavy losses from these drones.

NEW: 🇮🇱🇱🇧For the first time, Hezbollah has took out an IDF Merkava Mk. 4 with a FPV drone. A Hezbollah FPV flies right into the anti-drone cage, which does nothing to prevent an ammunition cookoff, likely destroying the tank. Israeli media are now reporting that Israel is withdrawing several battalions due to heavy losses from these drones.

Megatron

218,244 次观看 • 5 个月前

After Metal Slug 2, the reason X came out before 3 was because Metal Slug 2 had serious optimization issues, causing heavy slowdown during gameplay. So SNK decided to release an optimized version based on Metal Slug 2 first. That said, it wasn’t exactly the same game. They changed things like switching between daytime and nighttime backgrounds to create a different atmosphere, and even brought in some weapons that would later appear in Metal Slug 3. The controls were also improved, showing that a lot of care went into refining the experience. When you actually play it, you can clearly feel that the slowdown is significantly reduced compared to Metal Slug 2. Because of that, Metal Slug X became a very popular title alongside Metal Slug 3.

After Metal Slug 2, the reason X came out before 3 was because Metal Slug 2 had serious optimization issues, causing heavy slowdown during gameplay. So SNK decided to release an optimized version based on Metal Slug 2 first. That said, it wasn’t exactly the same game. They changed things like switching between daytime and nighttime backgrounds to create a different atmosphere, and even brought in some weapons that would later appear in Metal Slug 3. The controls were also improved, showing that a lot of care went into refining the experience. When you actually play it, you can clearly feel that the slowdown is significantly reduced compared to Metal Slug 2. Because of that, Metal Slug X became a very popular title alongside Metal Slug 3.

Gamer_lafan

34,208 次观看 • 5 个月前

Ukraine continues to work to isolate the Russians in Crimea, targeting road logistics, radars and energy installations, with an anti-aircraft gun as a treat. Despite heavy defenses including significant EW deployment, drones are still able to get through and the situation worsens for the Russians.

Ukraine continues to work to isolate the Russians in Crimea, targeting road logistics, radars and energy installations, with an anti-aircraft gun as a treat. Despite heavy defenses including significant EW deployment, drones are still able to get through and the situation worsens for the Russians.

Woofers

10,522 次观看 • 3 个月前

I've tried to explain what "mass" and the "cost differential" are many times. This video will show you. This is a Russian surveillance drone feed. Every single black dot on that road is a Ukrainian FPV drone waiting for a target – 100+ can be seen. Somewhere in the area is a small team of pilots who can plug in and activate each UAV. Mass: Imagine that a T-14 Armata tank column approaches. The tanks have been greatly upgraded to avoid and/or survive drone strikes – it's not as easy as strapping on an RPG warhead anymore. You need to hit that tank over and over and over again, and that's just with the UAVs that make it through the electronic and ballistic defenses. Bottom line, you might expend 20-50 drones to kill one piece of armor. Cost Differential: 20-50 drones to kill one tank now? You might jump to the conclusion that the small FPV drones are becoming obsolete. Not so fast. A T-14 costs between $7 and $9 million. Each drone sitting there on the dirt road costs about $1000. If it takes 50 drones to destroy a T-14, that's $50k to kill a $9m target AND its crew. I'll take that deal all day every day.

I've tried to explain what "mass" and the "cost differential" are many times. This video will show you. This is a Russian surveillance drone feed. Every single black dot on that road is a Ukrainian FPV drone waiting for a target – 100+ can be seen. Somewhere in the area is a small team of pilots who can plug in and activate each UAV. Mass: Imagine that a T-14 Armata tank column approaches. The tanks have been greatly upgraded to avoid and/or survive drone strikes – it's not as easy as strapping on an RPG warhead anymore. You need to hit that tank over and over and over again, and that's just with the UAVs that make it through the electronic and ballistic defenses. Bottom line, you might expend 20-50 drones to kill one piece of armor. Cost Differential: 20-50 drones to kill one tank now? You might jump to the conclusion that the small FPV drones are becoming obsolete. Not so fast. A T-14 costs between $7 and $9 million. Each drone sitting there on the dirt road costs about $1000. If it takes 50 drones to destroy a T-14, that's $50k to kill a $9m target AND its crew. I'll take that deal all day every day.

TimOnPoint

123,076 次观看 • 13 天前

USA Superweapons General: The Power Of The West (C&C Generals Zero Hour Mod) Let's Play #CommandAndConquer #GameMod The USA Superweapons General of the Power Of The West mod for Command and Conquer Generals Zero Hour features a nearly entirely different arsenal to the default USA of this mod. Heavy base defenses, one exclusive for anti-land, one exclusive for anti-air to defend your base as more powerful Particle Cannons carve up your enemies base. New and exclusive Land Units are: APC (A troop transport armed with a autocannon), ATV (fast attack vehicle), Vulcan Tank (a anti-personal tank), Archangel (a mech armed with minigun and anti-tank missiles), Archangel B (a mech with quad 60mm cannons), M113 (a expensive rocket launching unit that can destroy tanks and aircraft), 0Warthog Tank (a heavy tank), Gryphon Launcher (a long range launcher said to be armed with nuclear cruise missiles but they don't seem to leave behind radiation), Sentry Drone (has a unique 3D model with this faction), Stinger Soldier (A soldier with a anti-air rocket launcher, not trained or shown in this video). Air units are: NightEagle (the fighter plane unit for this faction), Huracan (bomber), Wraith (stealthed ground attack aircraft), BlackGhost (stealth helicopter gunship), Venom (support aircraft that can carry 6 soldiers), Viper (helicopter gunship that has a 20mm cannon, 8 anti-tank missiles, and can even attack aircraft). The mod can be found on ModDB, look it up. The old C&C games as part of the Ultimate Collection can be found on the Official EA App or Steam. It is also possible to procure The Power Of The West through the GenLauncher tool for C&C Generals Zero Hour which can be found on ModDB (where it also has the 1920x1080 resolution). I also upload videos on YouTube and Facebook that look at and profile video game mods, but I got other videos as well.

ZanyOnePip

10,184 次观看 • 2 年前

The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle. I started looking at the molten metal. All three buildings, both towers in the rubble in the basement areas, and Building Seven. There's these pools of molten metal. The molten steel was found three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed, he said that molten steel was also found underneath World Trade Center Seven. So I'm looking through the official reports. What do they say about the molten metal? They say nothing. Wait a minute. This is important evidence. So where'd that come from? Thermite is so hot; it'll just cut through steel, through structural steel, for example, like a knife through butter. The products are molten iron and aluminum oxide, which goes off primarily as a dust. You know those enormous dust clouds. You can imagine when you assemble these chemicals on a large scale. MORE 9/11 TRUTH AT THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT

The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle. I started looking at the molten metal. All three buildings, both towers in the rubble in the basement areas, and Building Seven. There's these pools of molten metal. The molten steel was found three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed, he said that molten steel was also found underneath World Trade Center Seven. So I'm looking through the official reports. What do they say about the molten metal? They say nothing. Wait a minute. This is important evidence. So where'd that come from? Thermite is so hot; it'll just cut through steel, through structural steel, for example, like a knife through butter. The products are molten iron and aluminum oxide, which goes off primarily as a dust. You know those enormous dust clouds. You can imagine when you assemble these chemicals on a large scale. MORE 9/11 TRUTH AT THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT

AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM

13,601 次观看 • 1 个月前

A “surprise” for Putin’s army: Ukraine has built around 300 km of new defensive lines The defenses stretch between Izium and Orikhiv. According to OSINT analyst Clément Molin, it could take the Russian army years to break through them. Anti-tank ditches, concrete pyramids and multiple rows of wire form an obstacle belt up to 100 meters wide. Infantry and drone operator positions are hidden deeper behind the lines — in forests and tree belts. These defenses won’t make the front impenetrable, but they can significantly slow Russia’s advance. On one section, even an unfinished defensive line held for nine months.

A “surprise” for Putin’s army: Ukraine has built around 300 km of new defensive lines The defenses stretch between Izium and Orikhiv. According to OSINT analyst Clément Molin, it could take the Russian army years to break through them. Anti-tank ditches, concrete pyramids and multiple rows of wire form an obstacle belt up to 100 meters wide. Infantry and drone operator positions are hidden deeper behind the lines — in forests and tree belts. These defenses won’t make the front impenetrable, but they can significantly slow Russia’s advance. On one section, even an unfinished defensive line held for nine months.

NEXTA

68,620 次观看 • 1 个月前

Houthi anti-tank missile teams are reportedly using Kornet and Dehlavieh missiles against military vehicles operated by Yemen’s National Army-linked forces. Much of the footage shows technicals and lightly protected vehicles rather than heavily armoured tanks, highlighting how anti-tank guided missiles can also be used against softer battlefield targets. Dehlavieh is widely described as an Iranian reverse-engineered version of the Russian Kornet family. While the Houthis also operate drones, this footage highlights a different pattern from Ukraine, where relatively inexpensive attack drones have become central to many anti-armour engagements. The contrast shows that weapons trends can vary dramatically between battlefields. Where drones are widely available, they can dominate battlefield strikes. But where Kornet-family missiles are more accessible, these older-generation guided weapons can still play a major role against military vehicles and exposed positions. #Houthi #missiles #MissileStrike #YemenConflict #missiles

Houthi anti-tank missile teams are reportedly using Kornet and Dehlavieh missiles against military vehicles operated by Yemen’s National Army-linked forces. Much of the footage shows technicals and lightly protected vehicles rather than heavily armoured tanks, highlighting how anti-tank guided missiles can also be used against softer battlefield targets. Dehlavieh is widely described as an Iranian reverse-engineered version of the Russian Kornet family. While the Houthis also operate drones, this footage highlights a different pattern from Ukraine, where relatively inexpensive attack drones have become central to many anti-armour engagements. The contrast shows that weapons trends can vary dramatically between battlefields. Where drones are widely available, they can dominate battlefield strikes. But where Kornet-family missiles are more accessible, these older-generation guided weapons can still play a major role against military vehicles and exposed positions. #Houthi #missiles #MissileStrike #YemenConflict #missiles

Srijan Pal Singh

14,942 次观看 • 6 天前

A Ukrainian heavy bomber drone eliminated a group of six Russian infantry wearing anti-drone thermal cloaks. Their behavior during the strike points to a near-total lack of basic military training. Instead of dispersing after an engagement with a drone, they stayed in place without even changing positions, making themselves an easy target. This suggests they were likely rushed straight to the frontline with little to no preparation, lacking even the most basic understanding of how to react to aerial drone threats.

A Ukrainian heavy bomber drone eliminated a group of six Russian infantry wearing anti-drone thermal cloaks. Their behavior during the strike points to a near-total lack of basic military training. Instead of dispersing after an engagement with a drone, they stayed in place without even changing positions, making themselves an easy target. This suggests they were likely rushed straight to the frontline with little to no preparation, lacking even the most basic understanding of how to react to aerial drone threats.

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦

82,772 次观看 • 5 个月前

Because I did a downer post - here is an upbeat post. SoCal in the 90s was a wonderful place, a wonderful time to be alive. And even though these guys are 50, they can bring back that feeling of being optimistic:

Because I did a downer post - here is an upbeat post. SoCal in the 90s was a wonderful place, a wonderful time to be alive. And even though these guys are 50, they can bring back that feeling of being optimistic:

FischerKing

23,806 次观看 • 1 年前

The Chinese are advancing on 6th-generation fighters, but I have serious doubts about whether this is truly the right path. Recently, the Turkish company Baykar flew two combat drones that operate in perfect synchronization, guided from a ground base. They executed coordinated maneuvers autonomously and are already capable of conducting BVR (Beyond Visual Range) engagements. The Kızılelma became the first drone to achieve an autonomous kill with an air-to-air missile guided by its own AESA radar. This level of Turkish progress, combined with the kill web integration that Chinese drones are demonstrating, isn’t it a strong indication that manned 6th-generation fighters might be an extraordinarily expensive fantasy? I’ll go further: some drones are already reaching speeds above Mach 3.5 - more than double those of the leading current manned fighters. I’m talking about drones capable of high-speed coordinated operations, fully autonomous, with integrated and shared weapon systems, flying at altitudes far higher than conventional fighters, and employing systems similar to Aegis. How much longer until these drones take off in large swarms, equipped with ultra-modern sensors controlled by AI and armed with long-range air-to-air missiles? How could a human pilot, even at the height of adrenaline, make faster and more accurate decisions, involving multiple scenarios and factors, than an AI commanding a pack of smaller, more agile drones operating at different altitudes? We are entering the real competition between man and machine. Even if a pilot in a 6th-generation fighter has control over slave drones and an entire Aegis-like kill web, what is the point of having him there if everything can be done autonomously, more safely, more cheaply, and in far greater numbers? Some argue that the human pilot offers advantages in unpredictable scenarios where today’s AI still fails, and I agree. But I’m not talking about current AI: I’m talking about the AI of 2030–2040, far more advanced than anything we know today. Geran drones equipped with air-to-air missiles prove that air combat drones can be extremely low-cost, while the Turkish tests show, in a far more sophisticated way, that drones designed for air-to-air missions are evolving much faster than 6th-generation aircraft, whose development and production costs are exorbitant. When we put together the Geran, the Kızılelma, and the drone kill web integration the Chinese are achieving, the question arises: is the future really manned 6th-generation fighters, or much cheaper drones produced in greater numbers, better protected, and more capable? Wouldn’t it be smarter to invest in well-equipped autonomous 6th-generation drones rather than treating them merely as wingmen? It seems that keeping a human pilot on board has more to do with ethical principles and preserving our role than with genuine operational necessity. And how would humanity react to the constant killing of human beings by AI-guided drones? Drones will be cheaper to develop, easier to produce, and possibly more agile than conventional fighters, even 6th-generation ones. In cost-benefit terms, the price of a single 6th-generation fighter could buy dozens of equivalent or even superior drones. This would save hundreds of billions of dollars and could put whoever adopts the strategy a step ahead. The Chinese, by the way, are very well positioned in this race, with HALE drones already armed with air-to-air missiles and integrated into an extensive kill web, which I will describe in detail soon.

The Chinese are advancing on 6th-generation fighters, but I have serious doubts about whether this is truly the right path. Recently, the Turkish company Baykar flew two combat drones that operate in perfect synchronization, guided from a ground base. They executed coordinated maneuvers autonomously and are already capable of conducting BVR (Beyond Visual Range) engagements. The Kızılelma became the first drone to achieve an autonomous kill with an air-to-air missile guided by its own AESA radar. This level of Turkish progress, combined with the kill web integration that Chinese drones are demonstrating, isn’t it a strong indication that manned 6th-generation fighters might be an extraordinarily expensive fantasy? I’ll go further: some drones are already reaching speeds above Mach 3.5 - more than double those of the leading current manned fighters. I’m talking about drones capable of high-speed coordinated operations, fully autonomous, with integrated and shared weapon systems, flying at altitudes far higher than conventional fighters, and employing systems similar to Aegis. How much longer until these drones take off in large swarms, equipped with ultra-modern sensors controlled by AI and armed with long-range air-to-air missiles? How could a human pilot, even at the height of adrenaline, make faster and more accurate decisions, involving multiple scenarios and factors, than an AI commanding a pack of smaller, more agile drones operating at different altitudes? We are entering the real competition between man and machine. Even if a pilot in a 6th-generation fighter has control over slave drones and an entire Aegis-like kill web, what is the point of having him there if everything can be done autonomously, more safely, more cheaply, and in far greater numbers? Some argue that the human pilot offers advantages in unpredictable scenarios where today’s AI still fails, and I agree. But I’m not talking about current AI: I’m talking about the AI of 2030–2040, far more advanced than anything we know today. Geran drones equipped with air-to-air missiles prove that air combat drones can be extremely low-cost, while the Turkish tests show, in a far more sophisticated way, that drones designed for air-to-air missions are evolving much faster than 6th-generation aircraft, whose development and production costs are exorbitant. When we put together the Geran, the Kızılelma, and the drone kill web integration the Chinese are achieving, the question arises: is the future really manned 6th-generation fighters, or much cheaper drones produced in greater numbers, better protected, and more capable? Wouldn’t it be smarter to invest in well-equipped autonomous 6th-generation drones rather than treating them merely as wingmen? It seems that keeping a human pilot on board has more to do with ethical principles and preserving our role than with genuine operational necessity. And how would humanity react to the constant killing of human beings by AI-guided drones? Drones will be cheaper to develop, easier to produce, and possibly more agile than conventional fighters, even 6th-generation ones. In cost-benefit terms, the price of a single 6th-generation fighter could buy dozens of equivalent or even superior drones. This would save hundreds of billions of dollars and could put whoever adopts the strategy a step ahead. The Chinese, by the way, are very well positioned in this race, with HALE drones already armed with air-to-air missiles and integrated into an extensive kill web, which I will describe in detail soon.

Patricia Marins

60,728 次观看 • 8 个月前

SUNSET RIDERS (Konami, 1991) 🎧🔊An arcade hit that dominated the run and gun genre until Metal Slug. The characters are memorable, specially Cormano Wild, and the music is beautiful (a Konami Kukeiha Club vinyl with the OST can be found on Amazon). Ported to SNES and MD later.

SUNSET RIDERS (Konami, 1991) 🎧🔊An arcade hit that dominated the run and gun genre until Metal Slug. The characters are memorable, specially Cormano Wild, and the music is beautiful (a Konami Kukeiha Club vinyl with the OST can be found on Amazon). Ported to SNES and MD later.

Dante retro dev 💾

56,340 次观看 • 8 个月前

Gaza has begun to realise that Israel can keep doing this until the end of time, while they can't. These anti-Hamas uprisings are hugely important. Now, if they can start providing Israel with intel on where the hostages are, that'd be a good start.

Gaza has begun to realise that Israel can keep doing this until the end of time, while they can't. These anti-Hamas uprisings are hugely important. Now, if they can start providing Israel with intel on where the hostages are, that'd be a good start.

𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎

24,950 次观看 • 1 年前

The K-CEV's new unmanned heavy armored combat engineering vehicle has been unveiled for the first time. Based on the K-21 IFV, it features a reinforced frame and additional armor. It can be operated manned or unmanned and features a new grenade launcher and machine gun combined turret with AI-based recognition and targeting. It is also said to be equipped with various drones. Mass production is scheduled for six months of testing. I personally like the K-21 IFV, but the K-CEV, based on its chassis, seems even more promising. ●The external structure visible behind the K-CEV appears to be an external drone containment unit. ●Other footage also shows scenes of the unmanned interior. ●Currently, they are converting existing tanks into unmanned tanks, IFVs into unmanned IFVs, and self-propelled guns and rocket artillery systems into unmanned firepower systems.

The K-CEV's new unmanned heavy armored combat engineering vehicle has been unveiled for the first time. Based on the K-21 IFV, it features a reinforced frame and additional armor. It can be operated manned or unmanned and features a new grenade launcher and machine gun combined turret with AI-based recognition and targeting. It is also said to be equipped with various drones. Mass production is scheduled for six months of testing. I personally like the K-21 IFV, but the K-CEV, based on its chassis, seems even more promising. ●The external structure visible behind the K-CEV appears to be an external drone containment unit. ●Other footage also shows scenes of the unmanned interior. ●Currently, they are converting existing tanks into unmanned tanks, IFVs into unmanned IFVs, and self-propelled guns and rocket artillery systems into unmanned firepower systems.

Mason ヨンハク

19,893 次观看 • 7 个月前

In China, they have created AI for a "swarm of death" from drones Chinese scientists have developed an autonomous system for locating enemy targets and destroying them without hindrance, even in the event of loss of communication and complete jamming. "Swarms of drones can be sent to high-risk areas with a single final order: find and destroy all opponents," said an expert from Beijing.

In China, they have created AI for a "swarm of death" from drones Chinese scientists have developed an autonomous system for locating enemy targets and destroying them without hindrance, even in the event of loss of communication and complete jamming. "Swarms of drones can be sent to high-risk areas with a single final order: find and destroy all opponents," said an expert from Beijing.

S p r i n t e r

10,436 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chinese drones practicing taking out drone boats. It was hilarious to see some Americans bragging about their small ass drone getting near a Chinese destroyer in peace time, as if an insinuation that they could do that in war time. In reality, the skies will be swarming with drones that can easily take out these drone boats. If they are lucky, the drone boats may get close enough for the CIWS on ships to turn them into Swiss cheese.

Chinese drones practicing taking out drone boats. It was hilarious to see some Americans bragging about their small ass drone getting near a Chinese destroyer in peace time, as if an insinuation that they could do that in war time. In reality, the skies will be swarming with drones that can easily take out these drone boats. If they are lucky, the drone boats may get close enough for the CIWS on ships to turn them into Swiss cheese.

Zhao DaShuai 东北进修🇨🇳

33,171 次观看 • 2 个月前