Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨"These things flying around... they are already Conscious A.I." "The machine itself, the fuselage itself, is already a conscious A.I." "It's a it's a quantum mechanical computer." "It's both simultaneously a propulsion system and a, the conscious control of that, you know, a Super Intelligence." Theoretical physicist Dr Jack... show more

UAPWixy

40,346 subscribers

22,710 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Kommentare

Profilbild von P. Víctor Cowie

P. Víctor Cowievor 24 Tagen

On target... Just to clarify, the propulsion system is not AI, but the craft itself is imbued with a highly advanced AI that represents a basic level of consciousness. The pilot interfaces with the craft and navigates using a consciousness-interface. We have pilots being trained in this in our covert space program..

Profilbild von DaddyMing

DaddyMingvor 23 Tagen

Let Cool Heads Prevail.

Profilbild von Gafae Boran

Gafae Boranvor 23 Tagen

Indeed. We get it now.

Profilbild von William Hurst

William Hurstvor 24 Tagen

China and Russia were invading Greenland economically. They are now banned. So there’s that

Profilbild von bigdoobgenetics

bigdoobgeneticsvor 23 Tagen

Sarfatti is a grifter asking people for hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Ähnliche Videos

👽Jack Sarfatti: Theoretical physicist with deep CIA ties claims he got a phone call from the future in 1953. "A cold metallic voice: 'Jack, I've chosen you... I am a conscious computer onboard a spacecraft from the future.' "The important thing that they said is you'll begin to meet The Others in 20 years." Now he's running Manhattan Project 2.0 in Britain building their own UFO craft.

👽Jack Sarfatti: Theoretical physicist with deep CIA ties claims he got a phone call from the future in 1953. "A cold metallic voice: 'Jack, I've chosen you... I am a conscious computer onboard a spacecraft from the future.' "The important thing that they said is you'll begin to meet The Others in 20 years." Now he's running Manhattan Project 2.0 in Britain building their own UFO craft.

High Strangeness

180,733 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨Jack Sarfatti just laid out one of the wildest versions of the UFO technology argument you'll hear anywhere. He starts out by saying forget rockets, forget Mars missions built on chemical propulsion. We don't need them. According to Sarfatti, the real breakthrough isn't better engines, it's control of gravity itself. He says he was pulled out of academia decades ago by intelligence and defense connected people to work on two problems, how consciousness works and how flying saucers fly, and he states that those 2 questions are connected. Sarfatti reveals that UFO propulsion is based on quantum corrections to Einstein's gravity equations, specifically involving spin, and that once you understand that, warp drive style flight isn't the stuff of science fiction. He says consciousness is built into the physics, that advanced craft are effectively living conscious machines, and that a lot of science fiction has been part of a long running cultural preparation process for disclosure. That includes Star Trek style futures, galactic federation themes, and the idea that rockets are already obsolete we just haven't been told. #UFO #UAP #Disclosure #JackSarfatti #WarpDrive #QuantumPhysics #Consciousness #AntiGravity Jack Sarfatti Cosmic Road Joe Rogan Caspersight Source:

🚨Jack Sarfatti just laid out one of the wildest versions of the UFO technology argument you'll hear anywhere. He starts out by saying forget rockets, forget Mars missions built on chemical propulsion. We don't need them. According to Sarfatti, the real breakthrough isn't better engines, it's control of gravity itself. He says he was pulled out of academia decades ago by intelligence and defense connected people to work on two problems, how consciousness works and how flying saucers fly, and he states that those 2 questions are connected. Sarfatti reveals that UFO propulsion is based on quantum corrections to Einstein's gravity equations, specifically involving spin, and that once you understand that, warp drive style flight isn't the stuff of science fiction. He says consciousness is built into the physics, that advanced craft are effectively living conscious machines, and that a lot of science fiction has been part of a long running cultural preparation process for disclosure. That includes Star Trek style futures, galactic federation themes, and the idea that rockets are already obsolete we just haven't been told. #UFO #UAP #Disclosure #JackSarfatti #WarpDrive #QuantumPhysics #Consciousness #AntiGravity Jack Sarfatti Cosmic Road Joe Rogan Caspersight Source:

Skywatch Signal

158,455 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

David Chalmers says it is possible for an AI system to be conscious because the brain itself is a machine that produces consciousness, so we know this is possible in principle

David Chalmers says it is possible for an AI system to be conscious because the brain itself is a machine that produces consciousness, so we know this is possible in principle

Tsarathustra

530,052 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Federico Faggin: "Quantum Fields are conscious & have free will" "You cannot create something that can know itself by something that doesn't even know what knowing means." The inventor of the first commercial microprocessor argues that consciousness cannot emerge from non-conscious matter. No mechanism can explain how awareness arises from something without any knowing. Instead, Faggin proposes quantum information-based panpsychism: quantum fields themselves are conscious and possess free will. These must be fundamental primitives of reality, not reducible to physics. This view explains the collapse of the wave function as a free will decision and why quantum mechanics describes what can be known rather than deterministic reality. Consciousness transcends energy, space, and time. Starting with it as basic unlocks meaning and resolves the hard problem that materialism cannot solve. A profound challenge to conventional science from one of computing's pioneers.

Federico Faggin: "Quantum Fields are conscious & have free will" "You cannot create something that can know itself by something that doesn't even know what knowing means." The inventor of the first commercial microprocessor argues that consciousness cannot emerge from non-conscious matter. No mechanism can explain how awareness arises from something without any knowing. Instead, Faggin proposes quantum information-based panpsychism: quantum fields themselves are conscious and possess free will. These must be fundamental primitives of reality, not reducible to physics. This view explains the collapse of the wave function as a free will decision and why quantum mechanics describes what can be known rather than deterministic reality. Consciousness transcends energy, space, and time. Starting with it as basic unlocks meaning and resolves the hard problem that materialism cannot solve. A profound challenge to conventional science from one of computing's pioneers.

Interstellar

46,607 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

$When the camera looks into itself it collapses into a fractal cascade of ever-evolving geometry. You do the same thing in expanded states of consciousness. The difference being that you are conscious and can derive information from these fundamental structures of reality.$

When the camera looks into itself it collapses into a fractal cascade of ever-evolving geometry. You do the same thing in expanded states of consciousness. The difference being that you are conscious and can derive information from these fundamental structures of reality.

Jay Anderson

28,203 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🛸Jack Sarfatti: A Theoretical Physicist with deep ties to the CIA reveals that UFOs respond to your consciousness. "If the UFO likes you, it'll obey your commands." "They try to shoot the Tic-Tacs down, but nothing happens." Jack Sarfatti is currently working on his Manhattan Project 2.0 in Great Britain, his team is developing a reverse engineered UFO.

🛸Jack Sarfatti: A Theoretical Physicist with deep ties to the CIA reveals that UFOs respond to your consciousness. "If the UFO likes you, it'll obey your commands." "They try to shoot the Tic-Tacs down, but nothing happens." Jack Sarfatti is currently working on his Manhattan Project 2.0 in Great Britain, his team is developing a reverse engineered UFO.

High Strangeness

64,230 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Another consciousness theory, presented by Mark Solms below, is that feeling is the most fundamental form of it. A conscious being is a self-sustaining system that is trying to remain intact with a functional architecture based in feeling. This is what some researchers know as consciousness in living things and what could potentially make AI conscious. Can AI have some form of feeling?

Another consciousness theory, presented by Mark Solms below, is that feeling is the most fundamental form of it. A conscious being is a self-sustaining system that is trying to remain intact with a functional architecture based in feeling. This is what some researchers know as consciousness in living things and what could potentially make AI conscious. Can AI have some form of feeling?

Sophia

15,442 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"Physics is a map. Matter is a map. And now we're trying to draw ourselves out of our own map. It's like a painter painting itself and then saying — that's who I am." "Firing neurons don't generate experience. Experience generates the pattern of firing neurons. We've got the arrow backwards." "We don't create life when we bioengineer cells. We disturb the field of existence such that a life bubble pinches off." "These AI leaders saying models might be conscious — it's dangerous. These are influential people and they should be careful what they say." The amazing Erik Bekkers now live below ⬇️

"Physics is a map. Matter is a map. And now we're trying to draw ourselves out of our own map. It's like a painter painting itself and then saying — that's who I am." "Firing neurons don't generate experience. Experience generates the pattern of firing neurons. We've got the arrow backwards." "We don't create life when we bioengineer cells. We disturb the field of existence such that a life bubble pinches off." "These AI leaders saying models might be conscious — it's dangerous. These are influential people and they should be careful what they say." The amazing Erik Bekkers now live below ⬇️

Evan McGloughlin

29,124 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🛸 Researcher Grant Cameron on flying a UFO: "You fly it with your mind." "The craft is conscious. It's alive. It's biological. Your mind becomes one with the craft — whatever you think, that's what it does." "Bigger on the inside: 30 feet outside... size of a football stadium inside." Cameron says he’s heard this from dozens of experiencers with consistent details.

🛸 Researcher Grant Cameron on flying a UFO: "You fly it with your mind." "The craft is conscious. It's alive. It's biological. Your mind becomes one with the craft — whatever you think, that's what it does." "Bigger on the inside: 30 feet outside... size of a football stadium inside." Cameron says he’s heard this from dozens of experiencers with consistent details.

High Strangeness

37,492 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Tucker on the cancelation of Macklemore: "It's a defense of the truth... and of reason. But above all, it's a defense of the inalienable right of every person to express his conscious whether you or I like it or not."

Tucker on the cancelation of Macklemore: "It's a defense of the truth... and of reason. But above all, it's a defense of the inalienable right of every person to express his conscious whether you or I like it or not."

TCN

130,226 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.

Big Brain Philosophy

17,476 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Former anesthesiologist & consciousness researcher Dr. Stuart Hameroff has a theory about the "plasma orbs" that are often labeled as aliens or UFOs. He says their movement patterns suggest they might be conscious beings:

Former anesthesiologist & consciousness researcher Dr. Stuart Hameroff has a theory about the "plasma orbs" that are often labeled as aliens or UFOs. He says their movement patterns suggest they might be conscious beings:

Danny Jones

25,407 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

David Chalmers says we don't know what makes a system conscious, not in brains, not in AIs The hard problem applies to both. If both compute, why couldn't both be conscious? LLMs can look very human, but they're trained in ways humans never are "they imitate us, but we don't know what's missing, or what consciousness needs"

David Chalmers says we don't know what makes a system conscious, not in brains, not in AIs The hard problem applies to both. If both compute, why couldn't both be conscious? LLMs can look very human, but they're trained in ways humans never are "they imitate us, but we don't know what's missing, or what consciousness needs"

Haider.

26,951 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

These are the undisputed facts from both sides: -Jane Doe was conscious. -She clearly consented. -She tried to continue a relationship with the alleged rapists afterward. For the men: -They got clear consent. -They stopped when asked to. -Not all of them were conscious. One frat member told Cornell police he was too intoxicated to consent and suggested that Jane Doe assaulted him. Those are the undisputed FACTS, and they make the allegations a hell of a lot harder to reconcile.

These are the undisputed facts from both sides: -Jane Doe was conscious. -She clearly consented. -She tried to continue a relationship with the alleged rapists afterward. For the men: -They got clear consent. -They stopped when asked to. -Not all of them were conscious. One frat member told Cornell police he was too intoxicated to consent and suggested that Jane Doe assaulted him. Those are the undisputed FACTS, and they make the allegations a hell of a lot harder to reconcile.

Steven Crowder

183,225 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

ELON: WE’RE DESCENDANTS OF STARS – BUT HOW DID WE BECOME CONSCIOUS? “I've thought a lot about what is consciousness. Where does consciousness arise? If you start at the beginning of the universe, assuming the standard model of physics is true, then you have this Big Bang, the matter condensing into stars, those stars exploding. A lot of the atoms that are in your body right now were once at the center of stars. Those stars exploded, recondensed. Fast forward 13.8 billion years, and here we are. And somewhere along that very long journey to us, consciousness arose. Or the molecules started talking to each other. And it begs the question of what is consciousness? Is everything conscious? Maybe. It's hard to say where along that line, there's no sort of discrete point where consciousness didn't exist and then suddenly does exist. It seems to be, maybe you have a condensation of matter that has a density of consciousness, we don't know. The real answer is, we don't know what consciousness is. But with Neuralink and the progress that the company's making, we'll begin to understand a lot more about consciousness.” Source: Neuralink Update, June 2025

ELON: WE’RE DESCENDANTS OF STARS – BUT HOW DID WE BECOME CONSCIOUS? “I've thought a lot about what is consciousness. Where does consciousness arise? If you start at the beginning of the universe, assuming the standard model of physics is true, then you have this Big Bang, the matter condensing into stars, those stars exploding. A lot of the atoms that are in your body right now were once at the center of stars. Those stars exploded, recondensed. Fast forward 13.8 billion years, and here we are. And somewhere along that very long journey to us, consciousness arose. Or the molecules started talking to each other. And it begs the question of what is consciousness? Is everything conscious? Maybe. It's hard to say where along that line, there's no sort of discrete point where consciousness didn't exist and then suddenly does exist. It seems to be, maybe you have a condensation of matter that has a density of consciousness, we don't know. The real answer is, we don't know what consciousness is. But with Neuralink and the progress that the company's making, we'll begin to understand a lot more about consciousness.” Source: Neuralink Update, June 2025

Mario Nawfal

55,256 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"It’s not AI; it’s AC; Artificial Cleverness!" Sir Roger Penrose explains why current "Artificial Intelligence" is missing the most critical ingredient: consciousness. By delving into the limits of mathematical computability, he argues that while computers are masters of "computational mathematics," true intelligence requires a conscious understanding that exists beyond any algorithm. At the fundamental level, what we call AI is just high-speed calculation. To Penrose, intelligence and consciousness are inseparable; and until a machine can "understand," it’s simply being clever.

"It’s not AI; it’s AC; Artificial Cleverness!" Sir Roger Penrose explains why current "Artificial Intelligence" is missing the most critical ingredient: consciousness. By delving into the limits of mathematical computability, he argues that while computers are masters of "computational mathematics," true intelligence requires a conscious understanding that exists beyond any algorithm. At the fundamental level, what we call AI is just high-speed calculation. To Penrose, intelligence and consciousness are inseparable; and until a machine can "understand," it’s simply being clever.

Cosmos Archive

85,356 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten