Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

They couldn't get through the door marked democracy. So they found one nobody would dare close. Marked it protect our children. That key is Digital ID. And it opens everything. Once it turns it never turns back. Keir Starmer has used children as a shield his entire career. First...

Banksycat's profile picture

BanksyCat

12,836 subscribers

16,773 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The absolute nerve of this PLONKER. You actually could not write it. They couldn't get digital ID through the front door. Every time they tried Britain pushed back. So they brought it through the back door. With children as the shield. Age verification doesn't stop at under 16s. Everyone proves their age. Everyone submits ID. Everyone goes into the database. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. It always expands. They're not just talking about social media. Autoplay. Infinite scrolling. Like buttons. Location sharing. Livestreaming. Read that list again. That's not things that harm children. That's things that keep adults asking questions. Sharing information. Organising. Resisting. Powers bypass Parliament. No scrutiny. No debate. No vote. VPNs being considered for banning. For children. For now. It always starts somewhere. Every government that has moved to control the internet has used children as the justification. Every single one. China. Russia. Iran. North Korea. And now Britain. But if this was really about protecting children he'd be confronting the 64% of child sexual abuse that's physical. Not online. He'd be publishing the data on who's doing it. He'd be facing his own record as DPP during the peak grooming gang years when a Rochdale victim wasn't considered credible despite DNA evidence and the abuse continued. Foreign nationals convicted of sexual assault at 2.24 times the rate of British nationals. Rape convictions 142% higher. That data buried for years. IT'S STILL HAPPENING. 1,797 arrests in one year. 1,200 children safeguarded every single month. Arrests going UP not down. But he's talking about autoplay and like buttons. Digital ID is the key. Children are the door. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. Every click tracked. Every search logged. Every dissenting voice identified. And whoever controls the internet CONTROLS THE CONVERSATION.
1:47

The absolute nerve of this PLONKER. You actually could not write it. They couldn't get digital ID through the front door. Every time they tried Britain pushed back. So they brought it through the back door. With children as the shield. Age verification doesn't stop at under 16s. Everyone proves their age. Everyone submits ID. Everyone goes into the database. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. It always expands. They're not just talking about social media. Autoplay. Infinite scrolling. Like buttons. Location sharing. Livestreaming. Read that list again. That's not things that harm children. That's things that keep adults asking questions. Sharing information. Organising. Resisting. Powers bypass Parliament. No scrutiny. No debate. No vote. VPNs being considered for banning. For children. For now. It always starts somewhere. Every government that has moved to control the internet has used children as the justification. Every single one. China. Russia. Iran. North Korea. And now Britain. But if this was really about protecting children he'd be confronting the 64% of child sexual abuse that's physical. Not online. He'd be publishing the data on who's doing it. He'd be facing his own record as DPP during the peak grooming gang years when a Rochdale victim wasn't considered credible despite DNA evidence and the abuse continued. Foreign nationals convicted of sexual assault at 2.24 times the rate of British nationals. Rape convictions 142% higher. That data buried for years. IT'S STILL HAPPENING. 1,797 arrests in one year. 1,200 children safeguarded every single month. Arrests going UP not down. But he's talking about autoplay and like buttons. Digital ID is the key. Children are the door. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. Every click tracked. Every search logged. Every dissenting voice identified. And whoever controls the internet CONTROLS THE CONVERSATION.

BanksyCat

84,019 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

They are not protecting our children. They are pushing them onto the dark web. Where there are no rules. No moderation. No oversight. Where the truly dangerous people go. Where nobody is watching. The NSPCC told them that. To their face and they did it anyway. Every parent wants the best for their children he said. We know. We ARE the parents. We do not need the state to replace us. Now ask yourself why. Because this was never about child safety. Child safety is the label. Nobody argues with child safety. That is the point. And if you dare question it Technology Secretary Peter Kyle will tell you live on Sky News that you are on the side of Jimmy Savile. Two Cabinet ministers said it on record. That is how you silence a country. This is Digital ID through the back door. Facial scans. Digital ID. Starmer confirmed it himself this morning. His own words. His own press conference. Every adult will have to verify their identity to get online. Every login. Every platform. All the time. They are scanning your phone. Not your social media. Your actual device. Apple. Google. Mandatory. Permanently. Before Christmas. For political control. For financial gain. That is state access to every device in Britain. Not prepared to compromise on the safety of our children Starmer said. Rotherham. Telford. Rochdale. Oldham. Derby. Oxford. Halifax. Newcastle. Thirty years. Thousands of children. Groomed. Raped. Trafficked. While he was Director of Public Prosecutions. THAT was compromise. The National Crime Agency confirmed 64% of child sexual abuse happens offline. In the home. By people they already know. Not social media. If they cared they would fund the social workers gutted over fifteen years. Instead they are scanning your phone. Britain just announced internet controls stricter than China demands of its own citizens. Bloomberg confirmed it. China built its Great Firewall piece by piece. Starting with things nobody argued with. North Korea controls every screen its citizens see. This is piece one. Control the children. Control their minds. Control the future. December 2025 Starmer personally opposed a blanket ban. Something changed. This is not a conviction. This is an instruction. Ask yourself who gave it. BlueSky excluded. Weakest child protection of all. Parliament voted this down twice. Bypassed entirely. Molly Russell's father called it a political stunt. The Times confirmed it is timed around Andy Burnham's by-election Wednesday. Child safety timed around political survival. Not the 39,000 unvetted strangers crossing the Channel last year. Unvetted. Unchecked. Unquestioned. They were not prepared to compromise on that. The tracksuit was deliberate. Relatable. Disarming. The tracksuit said ordinary dad. The announcement said surveillance state. He wanted to look like your neighbour. Not your jailer. Whoever replaces Starmer. Burnham. Anyone on that Labour bench. This infrastructure does not get dismantled. It gets extended. Your children are not the target. They are the key that unlocks the door. This is not about your children. It never was. You are next.
2:22

They are not protecting our children. They are pushing them onto the dark web. Where there are no rules. No moderation. No oversight. Where the truly dangerous people go. Where nobody is watching. The NSPCC told them that. To their face and they did it anyway. Every parent wants the best for their children he said. We know. We ARE the parents. We do not need the state to replace us. Now ask yourself why. Because this was never about child safety. Child safety is the label. Nobody argues with child safety. That is the point. And if you dare question it Technology Secretary Peter Kyle will tell you live on Sky News that you are on the side of Jimmy Savile. Two Cabinet ministers said it on record. That is how you silence a country. This is Digital ID through the back door. Facial scans. Digital ID. Starmer confirmed it himself this morning. His own words. His own press conference. Every adult will have to verify their identity to get online. Every login. Every platform. All the time. They are scanning your phone. Not your social media. Your actual device. Apple. Google. Mandatory. Permanently. Before Christmas. For political control. For financial gain. That is state access to every device in Britain. Not prepared to compromise on the safety of our children Starmer said. Rotherham. Telford. Rochdale. Oldham. Derby. Oxford. Halifax. Newcastle. Thirty years. Thousands of children. Groomed. Raped. Trafficked. While he was Director of Public Prosecutions. THAT was compromise. The National Crime Agency confirmed 64% of child sexual abuse happens offline. In the home. By people they already know. Not social media. If they cared they would fund the social workers gutted over fifteen years. Instead they are scanning your phone. Britain just announced internet controls stricter than China demands of its own citizens. Bloomberg confirmed it. China built its Great Firewall piece by piece. Starting with things nobody argued with. North Korea controls every screen its citizens see. This is piece one. Control the children. Control their minds. Control the future. December 2025 Starmer personally opposed a blanket ban. Something changed. This is not a conviction. This is an instruction. Ask yourself who gave it. BlueSky excluded. Weakest child protection of all. Parliament voted this down twice. Bypassed entirely. Molly Russell's father called it a political stunt. The Times confirmed it is timed around Andy Burnham's by-election Wednesday. Child safety timed around political survival. Not the 39,000 unvetted strangers crossing the Channel last year. Unvetted. Unchecked. Unquestioned. They were not prepared to compromise on that. The tracksuit was deliberate. Relatable. Disarming. The tracksuit said ordinary dad. The announcement said surveillance state. He wanted to look like your neighbour. Not your jailer. Whoever replaces Starmer. Burnham. Anyone on that Labour bench. This infrastructure does not get dismantled. It gets extended. Your children are not the target. They are the key that unlocks the door. This is not about your children. It never was. You are next.

BanksyCat

21,103 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

UNBELIEVABLE. Your entire life sold to a billionaire and you never got a vote. DIGITAL ID. Blair brokered it, the King read it out like a shopping list, and 2.96 million of you signed a petition begging them not to. They read it, smiled, and did it anyway. Here’s this COCKY IDIOT, smirking down the camera, telling you it's only what he was elected to do. The sheer NERVE. They tried to force this in 2006 and the country threw it back. So they got clever. You don't force a leash on a country, you call it child safety and let them clip it on themselves. Optional, they say. Until the bank needs it. Until the job needs it. Until you can't buy milk without it. Optional the way a cliff edge is optional. Embedded so deep that pulling it out takes the whole system down. Surviving every election. Every Prime Minister. Every one of you who never agreed to a word of it. That's not a service. It's a LEASH. Heavy surveillance with a friendly logo, built to watch you, price you, and switch you off the second you say the wrong thing. Once it turns, it never turns back. Now watch him smirk through it. FIVE times he stood there and said it's not possible. FIVE. Like a parrot that learned one phrase and mistook it for genius, reciting his greatest hits to a country that stopped clapping months ago, taking a bow in an empty theatre. Wrong every time, he sneers. No, sunshine. Wrong about the boats. The bills. The borders. The only thing he's right about is how much he adores the sound of his own voice telling you he's right. Watch what he's smirking THROUGH. The most despised Prime Minister this country has ever recorded. Ministers bolting for the door. MPs begging him to leave. A man waist deep in his own wreckage, straightening his tie for the cameras. He was elected to serve this country. Not gift-wrap your private life and post it to the highest bidder who filled Blair's pockets fastest. A landslide, he calls it. Won on barely a third of the vote, the emptiest mandate in living memory, worn like a crown God lowered onto his head. Biggest NHS drop in 17 years, he beams. For ONE month. While 7.3 million still rot on the list. Highest growth in the G7, he says. For ONE quarter. The next month it shrank. Funny how he forgot that bit. Then everything he left off the brochure. TEN things not one of you voted for. Not one in his manifesto. Winter fuel torn off ten million pensioners. Biggest tax raid since 1993. The thresholds Reeves swore she'd never freeze, frozen. Energy bills up after he promised cuts. The family farm tax. WASPI women promised the earth, handed a shrug. Grooming inquiry sat on six months. Post offices for the chop. Chagos given away. And the tenth, buried deepest. Digital ID, held up behind the children like a human shield, because who argues with protecting kids. Then they vote to come for your VPN, the one tool that let you slip the net, and bolt the last door behind you. Here's the punchline that should make your blood boil. Australia tried this exact ban. Months later the children strolled straight through it. It didn't protect ONE child. It was never built to. The children were never the point. The contract was. Blair gets richer. Ellison gets richer. Then they plug it into Europe so the same machine prints money across a continent. Every regime that ever pulled this used the same excuse. China. Russia. North Korea. Protect the people. Then own them. The children were never the target. They were the costume. You were never protected. You were harvested, and told to say thank you. So watch him smirk and call it a mandate. It was never a mandate. It's the biggest robbery in plain sight this country has ever seen, dressed up as the will of the people and sold back to you as kindness. Once it turns, it never turns back.
1:23

UNBELIEVABLE. Your entire life sold to a billionaire and you never got a vote. DIGITAL ID. Blair brokered it, the King read it out like a shopping list, and 2.96 million of you signed a petition begging them not to. They read it, smiled, and did it anyway. Here’s this COCKY IDIOT, smirking down the camera, telling you it's only what he was elected to do. The sheer NERVE. They tried to force this in 2006 and the country threw it back. So they got clever. You don't force a leash on a country, you call it child safety and let them clip it on themselves. Optional, they say. Until the bank needs it. Until the job needs it. Until you can't buy milk without it. Optional the way a cliff edge is optional. Embedded so deep that pulling it out takes the whole system down. Surviving every election. Every Prime Minister. Every one of you who never agreed to a word of it. That's not a service. It's a LEASH. Heavy surveillance with a friendly logo, built to watch you, price you, and switch you off the second you say the wrong thing. Once it turns, it never turns back. Now watch him smirk through it. FIVE times he stood there and said it's not possible. FIVE. Like a parrot that learned one phrase and mistook it for genius, reciting his greatest hits to a country that stopped clapping months ago, taking a bow in an empty theatre. Wrong every time, he sneers. No, sunshine. Wrong about the boats. The bills. The borders. The only thing he's right about is how much he adores the sound of his own voice telling you he's right. Watch what he's smirking THROUGH. The most despised Prime Minister this country has ever recorded. Ministers bolting for the door. MPs begging him to leave. A man waist deep in his own wreckage, straightening his tie for the cameras. He was elected to serve this country. Not gift-wrap your private life and post it to the highest bidder who filled Blair's pockets fastest. A landslide, he calls it. Won on barely a third of the vote, the emptiest mandate in living memory, worn like a crown God lowered onto his head. Biggest NHS drop in 17 years, he beams. For ONE month. While 7.3 million still rot on the list. Highest growth in the G7, he says. For ONE quarter. The next month it shrank. Funny how he forgot that bit. Then everything he left off the brochure. TEN things not one of you voted for. Not one in his manifesto. Winter fuel torn off ten million pensioners. Biggest tax raid since 1993. The thresholds Reeves swore she'd never freeze, frozen. Energy bills up after he promised cuts. The family farm tax. WASPI women promised the earth, handed a shrug. Grooming inquiry sat on six months. Post offices for the chop. Chagos given away. And the tenth, buried deepest. Digital ID, held up behind the children like a human shield, because who argues with protecting kids. Then they vote to come for your VPN, the one tool that let you slip the net, and bolt the last door behind you. Here's the punchline that should make your blood boil. Australia tried this exact ban. Months later the children strolled straight through it. It didn't protect ONE child. It was never built to. The children were never the point. The contract was. Blair gets richer. Ellison gets richer. Then they plug it into Europe so the same machine prints money across a continent. Every regime that ever pulled this used the same excuse. China. Russia. North Korea. Protect the people. Then own them. The children were never the target. They were the costume. You were never protected. You were harvested, and told to say thank you. So watch him smirk and call it a mandate. It was never a mandate. It's the biggest robbery in plain sight this country has ever seen, dressed up as the will of the people and sold back to you as kindness. Once it turns, it never turns back.

BanksyCat

561,611 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A raped child in this country knocked on SIX doors for help. The police. The social workers. The prosecutors. The council. The mayor. The government. Every single one SLAMMED in her face. Nearly every one of those doors belongs to the people running Britain right now. Today Carla Lockhart MP asked Keir Starmer to make sure the inquiry finally lets the truth out. She was asking the man who sat at the top of the system that buried it. Because when Starmer talks about institutions that looked the other way, he wasn't watching it happen. He was RUNNING one. Picture one girl. Just one. Being raped by a gang, trying to be heard. Watch every door she knocks on, and watch who's behind it. The police. They don't record it. They call her a nuisance, a troublemaker, a girl making a lifestyle choice. In some towns, officers are now accused of abusing girls themselves. Door one. SLAMMED. The social workers. They see her too. In Rochdale, a youth worker made over 100 referrals about girls being abused. She was ignored. The girls were written off as making lifestyle choices, a problem to file away, not children to save. Door two. Locked. The prosecutors. In Rochdale, 2009, the CPS dropped her case. Not a credible witness, they said. The men walked free, convicted only years later once someone else overturned it. That service was run, at the top, by Keir Starmer, 2008 to 2013. He later admitted the ethnicity of the abusers had played a role in how those cases were handled. Door three. Shut. The council. In Rotherham, where 1,400 children were raped and trafficked, the council was his party's. 57 of 63 seats. In denial. Not fit for purpose. It tried to gag a journalist. An inspector found a case file with the word Pakistani tippexed out, so nobody could see the pattern. Door four. Bolted. The mayor. In Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham commissioned a review. The Rochdale whistleblower Maggie Oliver called it a whitewash and walked away, saying survivors were silenced. Door five. Closed. The government. When Oldham begged for a national inquiry, minister Jess Phillips refused it. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper waved it off, we'd already had one and Starmer resisted a statutory inquiry until an audit forced his hand, announcing it two days before the report landed. Only when cornered. Door six. Slammed in her face. Now see it for what it is. Not one failure. A WALL. Six locked doors, one after another, built around a child so she could never get out. They ask why the girls didn't just speak up. They did. Over and over. This is why so few were ever heard. Not because they stayed silent. Because every door they knocked on was locked from the other side. It wasn't one town. That same wall stood across 149 local authority areas. 149. Here's the part that should stop you cold. Not one of the people behind those doors was punished. Every single one was promoted. Starmer ran the prosecutors. Now he's Prime Minister. David Lammy, who warned against pandering to the far-right over these gangs and said naming the pattern condemned a whole community, is now Deputy PM and Justice Secretary. Yvette Cooper, who rejected the inquiry, made Foreign Secretary. Andy Burnham, whose review was called a whitewash, now the favourite to be the next Prime Minister. The wall didn't fall. It got promoted. So today Carla Lockhart handed Starmer a mirror. She asked the man who sat at the top of that wall to investigate it and he thanked her for her courage, and moved on. That's the tell. Not a man who wants the truth found. A man who already knows where it leads. So when he swears the inquiry will go wherever the evidence takes it, ask the one question that matters. What happens when it leads back to the people now holding it. That's not a man opening a door for these girls. That's the men who built the wall, handing themselves the only key.
2:06

A raped child in this country knocked on SIX doors for help. The police. The social workers. The prosecutors. The council. The mayor. The government. Every single one SLAMMED in her face. Nearly every one of those doors belongs to the people running Britain right now. Today Carla Lockhart MP asked Keir Starmer to make sure the inquiry finally lets the truth out. She was asking the man who sat at the top of the system that buried it. Because when Starmer talks about institutions that looked the other way, he wasn't watching it happen. He was RUNNING one. Picture one girl. Just one. Being raped by a gang, trying to be heard. Watch every door she knocks on, and watch who's behind it. The police. They don't record it. They call her a nuisance, a troublemaker, a girl making a lifestyle choice. In some towns, officers are now accused of abusing girls themselves. Door one. SLAMMED. The social workers. They see her too. In Rochdale, a youth worker made over 100 referrals about girls being abused. She was ignored. The girls were written off as making lifestyle choices, a problem to file away, not children to save. Door two. Locked. The prosecutors. In Rochdale, 2009, the CPS dropped her case. Not a credible witness, they said. The men walked free, convicted only years later once someone else overturned it. That service was run, at the top, by Keir Starmer, 2008 to 2013. He later admitted the ethnicity of the abusers had played a role in how those cases were handled. Door three. Shut. The council. In Rotherham, where 1,400 children were raped and trafficked, the council was his party's. 57 of 63 seats. In denial. Not fit for purpose. It tried to gag a journalist. An inspector found a case file with the word Pakistani tippexed out, so nobody could see the pattern. Door four. Bolted. The mayor. In Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham commissioned a review. The Rochdale whistleblower Maggie Oliver called it a whitewash and walked away, saying survivors were silenced. Door five. Closed. The government. When Oldham begged for a national inquiry, minister Jess Phillips refused it. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper waved it off, we'd already had one and Starmer resisted a statutory inquiry until an audit forced his hand, announcing it two days before the report landed. Only when cornered. Door six. Slammed in her face. Now see it for what it is. Not one failure. A WALL. Six locked doors, one after another, built around a child so she could never get out. They ask why the girls didn't just speak up. They did. Over and over. This is why so few were ever heard. Not because they stayed silent. Because every door they knocked on was locked from the other side. It wasn't one town. That same wall stood across 149 local authority areas. 149. Here's the part that should stop you cold. Not one of the people behind those doors was punished. Every single one was promoted. Starmer ran the prosecutors. Now he's Prime Minister. David Lammy, who warned against pandering to the far-right over these gangs and said naming the pattern condemned a whole community, is now Deputy PM and Justice Secretary. Yvette Cooper, who rejected the inquiry, made Foreign Secretary. Andy Burnham, whose review was called a whitewash, now the favourite to be the next Prime Minister. The wall didn't fall. It got promoted. So today Carla Lockhart handed Starmer a mirror. She asked the man who sat at the top of that wall to investigate it and he thanked her for her courage, and moved on. That's the tell. Not a man who wants the truth found. A man who already knows where it leads. So when he swears the inquiry will go wherever the evidence takes it, ask the one question that matters. What happens when it leads back to the people now holding it. That's not a man opening a door for these girls. That's the men who built the wall, handing themselves the only key.

BanksyCat

361,299 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I’m still catching up from yesterday, but this right here is one of the reasons why he is the greatest presidents of all time… "Every public school in America is now on notice that if they tell a child that they're trapped in the wrong body, they are committing child abuse" That’s exactly what it is… CHILD ABUSE. Doctors & parents who do this to children should be thrown in prison.
0:21

I’m still catching up from yesterday, but this right here is one of the reasons why he is the greatest presidents of all time… "Every public school in America is now on notice that if they tell a child that they're trapped in the wrong body, they are committing child abuse" That’s exactly what it is… CHILD ABUSE. Doctors & parents who do this to children should be thrown in prison.

MJTruthUltra

20,872 просмотров • 1 день назад

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.
1:00

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.

Dustin

20,938 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

They promised it would stay in the privacy of their own homes. That was a lie. The moment the old guardrails came down, the demands escalated straight into buying babies and deliberately creating motherless homes. Surrogacy turns children into products and rips them from the only mother they will ever have. Chesterton’s fence was there for a reason. Those boundaries existed to protect the conditions children actually need: a mother and a father. Every single one of us comes from one of each. Treating that as optional is not compassion. It is adult selfishness imposed on the most vulnerable. Children are not raw material for anyone’s lifestyle experiment. That line is not negotiable.
2:59

They promised it would stay in the privacy of their own homes. That was a lie. The moment the old guardrails came down, the demands escalated straight into buying babies and deliberately creating motherless homes. Surrogacy turns children into products and rips them from the only mother they will ever have. Chesterton’s fence was there for a reason. Those boundaries existed to protect the conditions children actually need: a mother and a father. Every single one of us comes from one of each. Treating that as optional is not compassion. It is adult selfishness imposed on the most vulnerable. Children are not raw material for anyone’s lifestyle experiment. That line is not negotiable.

Kangmin Lee | 이강민

14,214 просмотров • 26 дней назад

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.
0:39

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

Kirk Rollins

21,168 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 Donate urgently to the children of Gaza. 🚨 In Gaza… A child’s world is no longer made of streets. It is made of rubble. Children no longer walk to school. They climb over the shattered remains of the homes where they were born. Every broken wall once echoed with laughter. Every collapsed roof once sheltered a family. Every pile of concrete was once a place called home. Now… It is all that is left. In Gaza… Children do not search through the ruins for toys. They search for food. Small hands carry empty bowls through neighborhoods reduced to dust. Not knowing if today will be another day without a meal. Many children have become too weak to play. Too weak to run. Too weak to smile. Some are now too exhausted even to cry. Hunger has taken away the strength to ask for more. Despite the devastating collapse in donations, Project Muhmmed continues preparing and distributing hot meals inside Gaza’s displacement camps. Every meal we serve reaches a child who has already lost so much. By the mercy of God, and thanks to the compassion of: ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) Today… Hot meals reached children surrounded by rubble instead of playgrounds. For one more day… A hungry child was able to eat. For one more day… Hope reached a family that believed the world had forgotten them. But thousands of children are still waiting. Thousands of parents still have nothing to place inside their children’s bowls. Every donation today becomes a hot meal. Every share brings this appeal to someone who can help save another family. 🍽️ Donate now. Gaza’s children cannot afford to wait. Together, we fight hunger. Together, we protect children. Together, we stand with Gaza. 🇵🇸🤍
1:34

🚨 Donate urgently to the children of Gaza. 🚨 In Gaza… A child’s world is no longer made of streets. It is made of rubble. Children no longer walk to school. They climb over the shattered remains of the homes where they were born. Every broken wall once echoed with laughter. Every collapsed roof once sheltered a family. Every pile of concrete was once a place called home. Now… It is all that is left. In Gaza… Children do not search through the ruins for toys. They search for food. Small hands carry empty bowls through neighborhoods reduced to dust. Not knowing if today will be another day without a meal. Many children have become too weak to play. Too weak to run. Too weak to smile. Some are now too exhausted even to cry. Hunger has taken away the strength to ask for more. Despite the devastating collapse in donations, Project Muhmmed continues preparing and distributing hot meals inside Gaza’s displacement camps. Every meal we serve reaches a child who has already lost so much. By the mercy of God, and thanks to the compassion of: ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) Today… Hot meals reached children surrounded by rubble instead of playgrounds. For one more day… A hungry child was able to eat. For one more day… Hope reached a family that believed the world had forgotten them. But thousands of children are still waiting. Thousands of parents still have nothing to place inside their children’s bowls. Every donation today becomes a hot meal. Every share brings this appeal to someone who can help save another family. 🍽️ Donate now. Gaza’s children cannot afford to wait. Together, we fight hunger. Together, we protect children. Together, we stand with Gaza. 🇵🇸🤍

Muhmmed Project𓂆 🇵🇸

16,873 просмотров • 27 дней назад

🚨 Toby Rogers on the autism epidemic: “It’s like if a plane full of children crashed every day—and no one did anything.” “A study… started with a group of normal children [and] tracked them for 3 years.” “If [the study] is correct… 207 children every day in the United States, 365 days a year, regress into autism.” “[It] found that up to 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression.” “It suggests an acute toxic exposure.” “What’s the most likely acute toxic exposure to a child?” “The vaccines.” “115,000 children per year in the United States develop autism.” “That's 315 children per day, every day of the year.” “We have to stop 115,000 autism cases from happening every year.” “The way that we stop that is by keeping toxic chemicals out of kids’ bodies.” “That starts with getting rid of vaccine schedules altogether.” “But we also have to ban, and better regulate, about a dozen other toxic chemicals as well.”
3:07

🚨 Toby Rogers on the autism epidemic: “It’s like if a plane full of children crashed every day—and no one did anything.” “A study… started with a group of normal children [and] tracked them for 3 years.” “If [the study] is correct… 207 children every day in the United States, 365 days a year, regress into autism.” “[It] found that up to 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression.” “It suggests an acute toxic exposure.” “What’s the most likely acute toxic exposure to a child?” “The vaccines.” “115,000 children per year in the United States develop autism.” “That's 315 children per day, every day of the year.” “We have to stop 115,000 autism cases from happening every year.” “The way that we stop that is by keeping toxic chemicals out of kids’ bodies.” “That starts with getting rid of vaccine schedules altogether.” “But we also have to ban, and better regulate, about a dozen other toxic chemicals as well.”

Children’s Health Defense

51,072 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Mark Zuckerberg just told the world his own company shouldn’t exist. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He runs Meta. 70,000 employees. He just described a future where one person replaces all of them. And he’s the one building it. That is not a prediction about technology. That is a CEO engineering the obsolescence of his own workforce. While they watch him do it. Every company, every government, every university, every hospital on Earth was built on a single premise. No one person could do it alone. That is not a feature of civilization. It is the foundation. Every hierarchy, every org chart, every payroll ever written exists because of that one limitation. Zuckerberg just announced the limitation is ending. So follow the logic where it leads. If one person can produce the output of ten thousand, what is one person worth? Now look at the word “everyone” in his sentence. Because this does not land on everyone. It never has. The printing press was sold as liberation. It built media empires. The internet was sold as liberation. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as freedom. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg does not gain the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gains the power of 10,000 organizations. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He was making a case for building AI. Read that again as an employee. A man who commands 70,000 people just questioned whether their collective intelligence exceeds one person’s. That is not a vision for the future. That is the most honest thing a CEO has ever said out loud about the people who built his empire.
0:59

Mark Zuckerberg just told the world his own company shouldn’t exist. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He runs Meta. 70,000 employees. He just described a future where one person replaces all of them. And he’s the one building it. That is not a prediction about technology. That is a CEO engineering the obsolescence of his own workforce. While they watch him do it. Every company, every government, every university, every hospital on Earth was built on a single premise. No one person could do it alone. That is not a feature of civilization. It is the foundation. Every hierarchy, every org chart, every payroll ever written exists because of that one limitation. Zuckerberg just announced the limitation is ending. So follow the logic where it leads. If one person can produce the output of ten thousand, what is one person worth? Now look at the word “everyone” in his sentence. Because this does not land on everyone. It never has. The printing press was sold as liberation. It built media empires. The internet was sold as liberation. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as freedom. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg does not gain the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gains the power of 10,000 organizations. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He was making a case for building AI. Read that again as an employee. A man who commands 70,000 people just questioned whether their collective intelligence exceeds one person’s. That is not a vision for the future. That is the most honest thing a CEO has ever said out loud about the people who built his empire.

Dustin

113,734 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A Japanese TV crew filmed an apartment building where 95 percent of the tenants are foreign and the rules get broken every day. The landlord never found a manager who spoke enough of the languages, so he handed the whole building to an AI and forgot about it. A year later, the tenants still think a person is keeping them in line. He had typed one line: keep my residents following the rules. Then he closed the laptop. Pause at 1:12. Look at the notice by the trash room. The same message in nine languages, updated weekly, signed by no one. The manager on camera admits it. He does not speak those languages. He does not write the notices. The AI does. It hears every complaint at the desk and learns which rule each nationality breaks, and why. One tenant says in Vietnam you sing karaoke at home, never knowing it was a problem. The AI does not lecture her. It rewrites the rule in her language, with the reason attached, and slips it under her door. Here is the part the old woman on the third floor never understood. She complained in Japanese for years and nothing changed. The AI said it once, in the right language, with the right reason, and the trash finally got sorted. It was never that they would not listen. It was that no one had said it in a way they could hear. The crew came to film a country that cannot teach its own rules. They left with a machine that already had.
1:17

A Japanese TV crew filmed an apartment building where 95 percent of the tenants are foreign and the rules get broken every day. The landlord never found a manager who spoke enough of the languages, so he handed the whole building to an AI and forgot about it. A year later, the tenants still think a person is keeping them in line. He had typed one line: keep my residents following the rules. Then he closed the laptop. Pause at 1:12. Look at the notice by the trash room. The same message in nine languages, updated weekly, signed by no one. The manager on camera admits it. He does not speak those languages. He does not write the notices. The AI does. It hears every complaint at the desk and learns which rule each nationality breaks, and why. One tenant says in Vietnam you sing karaoke at home, never knowing it was a problem. The AI does not lecture her. It rewrites the rule in her language, with the reason attached, and slips it under her door. Here is the part the old woman on the third floor never understood. She complained in Japanese for years and nothing changed. The AI said it once, in the right language, with the right reason, and the trash finally got sorted. It was never that they would not listen. It was that no one had said it in a way they could hear. The crew came to film a country that cannot teach its own rules. They left with a machine that already had.

Carver

869,620 просмотров • 25 дней назад

One man swore his door would never shut on a homeless child again. 🇬🇧 Nearly 60,000 children came through it. One winter night in Victorian London, a homeless boy led a young medical student up onto the rooftops, to where the city's lost children slept in the freezing dark. The student counted 11. He was Thomas Barnardo, a Dublin-born student bound for missionary work in China. China never got him. The East End did. He left his training behind, because the children could not wait. In 1870 he opened a home for destitute boys at Stepney Causeway and taught them a trade. Then a boy called Carrots was turned away one night because the home was full. 2 days later he was found dead, of cold and hunger. Barnardo swore it would never happen again. A sign went up: no destitute child ever refused admission. The door stayed open, lamp lit, all night, every night, for the rest of his life. By his death in 1905, nearly 60,000 children had been taken in. We tell him whole. His staged fundraising photographs and his child-emigration schemes are criticised today, and fairly, and we do not hide it. But the door he kept open took in tens of thousands of children who had no one, and the charity that carries his name still works across Britain. Britain is built by people who will not look away. We put the names back, free, for anyone who wants them. If you can afford to, help us teach thousands their own history: Want to learn more? Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
1:39

One man swore his door would never shut on a homeless child again. 🇬🇧 Nearly 60,000 children came through it. One winter night in Victorian London, a homeless boy led a young medical student up onto the rooftops, to where the city's lost children slept in the freezing dark. The student counted 11. He was Thomas Barnardo, a Dublin-born student bound for missionary work in China. China never got him. The East End did. He left his training behind, because the children could not wait. In 1870 he opened a home for destitute boys at Stepney Causeway and taught them a trade. Then a boy called Carrots was turned away one night because the home was full. 2 days later he was found dead, of cold and hunger. Barnardo swore it would never happen again. A sign went up: no destitute child ever refused admission. The door stayed open, lamp lit, all night, every night, for the rest of his life. By his death in 1905, nearly 60,000 children had been taken in. We tell him whole. His staged fundraising photographs and his child-emigration schemes are criticised today, and fairly, and we do not hide it. But the door he kept open took in tens of thousands of children who had no one, and the charity that carries his name still works across Britain. Britain is built by people who will not look away. We put the names back, free, for anyone who wants them. If you can afford to, help us teach thousands their own history: Want to learn more? Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

26,049 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

REPORT: Republicans are now advancing a federal version of the same digital ID system sweeping through Texas, the U.K., and Australia—proving this agenda isn’t partisan, it’s coordinated and global. Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. John James have introduced the “App Store Accountability Act,” claiming it will protect children online. But hidden in the fine print is vague language on “age verification” and “parental consent,” with no clear explanation of how it works—or who controls it. In practice, Americans could soon be required to upload their government ID or submit biometric data to an “approved provider” just to prove they’re adults. Parents would be forced to link their digital profiles to their children’s, giving unknown third parties access to both. It’s the same pattern already unfolding in the U.K. and Australia, where officials now admit Digital ID will be used for “age assurance.” Once implemented, every click, post, and purchase can be tracked and restricted—all under the guise of child safety. This isn’t about protecting children—it’s about controlling you. If Americans don’t act now, digital freedom will disappear before their eyes. reveals how close they are to locking it in.
12:13

REPORT: Republicans are now advancing a federal version of the same digital ID system sweeping through Texas, the U.K., and Australia—proving this agenda isn’t partisan, it’s coordinated and global. Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. John James have introduced the “App Store Accountability Act,” claiming it will protect children online. But hidden in the fine print is vague language on “age verification” and “parental consent,” with no clear explanation of how it works—or who controls it. In practice, Americans could soon be required to upload their government ID or submit biometric data to an “approved provider” just to prove they’re adults. Parents would be forced to link their digital profiles to their children’s, giving unknown third parties access to both. It’s the same pattern already unfolding in the U.K. and Australia, where officials now admit Digital ID will be used for “age assurance.” Once implemented, every click, post, and purchase can be tracked and restricted—all under the guise of child safety. This isn’t about protecting children—it’s about controlling you. If Americans don’t act now, digital freedom will disappear before their eyes. reveals how close they are to locking it in.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

216,688 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Pakistani Muslim Mohammed Zahid has been sentenced to 35 years in prison for his role in the grooming gang and the rape of over 100 white children. Starmer’s Britain is soft on these monsters while our daughters’ lives are destroyed forever. 35 years is not enough for raping over 100 children. Sack every traitor who enabled this horror and covered it up for decades. Deport every last one of these beasts and their networks. Restore justice and Britain as a safe homeland where our children are protected from grooming gangs. No more cover-ups. No more betrayal. Fight back now. 🇬🇧 (video courtesy of Andrew Cohen 🇮🇱🇬🇧)
4:02

Pakistani Muslim Mohammed Zahid has been sentenced to 35 years in prison for his role in the grooming gang and the rape of over 100 white children. Starmer’s Britain is soft on these monsters while our daughters’ lives are destroyed forever. 35 years is not enough for raping over 100 children. Sack every traitor who enabled this horror and covered it up for decades. Deport every last one of these beasts and their networks. Restore justice and Britain as a safe homeland where our children are protected from grooming gangs. No more cover-ups. No more betrayal. Fight back now. 🇬🇧 (video courtesy of Andrew Cohen 🇮🇱🇬🇧)

Right over Left Everytime

13,491 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A Muslim family's home was smashed in Walsall this week. Their car too. Their children were inside. They reported it. One family. No response. It is not the first time this town has been the address. Last October, a Sikh woman was followed home from the bus in Walsall. A man forced his way in. He raped her, repeatedly calling her an effing Muslim bitch. She told him she was not Muslim. It did not matter. The hostility doesn't check. It sees a face and decides. John Ashby. Jailed for life. This week, in Parliament, Shockat Adam MP stood up and named it. He told the House his children are kicking every ball of England's World Cup campaign — and that as a Muslim parent, he is afraid for their safety in this country. He listed why. The Sikh woman in Walsall, raped as an "effing Muslim bitch." No condemnation from a Minister at the despatch box. The Unite the Kingdom march openly calling for Muslims to be expelled. No ministerial statement. Five Muslim men stabbed on the streets of Edinburgh. No statement. No COBRA. No solidarity. Then he asked: "What does this silence say to my children?" The Prime Minister said he wants his children to feel safe, and that an attack on one is an attack on all. He did not name Walsall. He did not name Edinburgh. He did not name the march. He did not say the word. Now look at what this country does when it decides a threat is real. 29 April 2026. Two Jewish men stabbed in Golders Green. COBRA convened the same day. The Prime Minister visited the scene. Threat level raised to severe. A 100-officer task force deployed. This was the right response. It was correct. The threat was real. Antisemitism is real. The state moved. In Walsall, a family's home and car were destroyed with their children inside. No COBRA. No statement. No task force. No one will even name it. We are not asking for less protection for anyone. We are asking for the same. So when the children in that house ask if they are safe, there is an answer. West Midlands Police Report: Keep us alive: Substack: IG: Islamophia Exists
0:52

A Muslim family's home was smashed in Walsall this week. Their car too. Their children were inside. They reported it. One family. No response. It is not the first time this town has been the address. Last October, a Sikh woman was followed home from the bus in Walsall. A man forced his way in. He raped her, repeatedly calling her an effing Muslim bitch. She told him she was not Muslim. It did not matter. The hostility doesn't check. It sees a face and decides. John Ashby. Jailed for life. This week, in Parliament, Shockat Adam MP stood up and named it. He told the House his children are kicking every ball of England's World Cup campaign — and that as a Muslim parent, he is afraid for their safety in this country. He listed why. The Sikh woman in Walsall, raped as an "effing Muslim bitch." No condemnation from a Minister at the despatch box. The Unite the Kingdom march openly calling for Muslims to be expelled. No ministerial statement. Five Muslim men stabbed on the streets of Edinburgh. No statement. No COBRA. No solidarity. Then he asked: "What does this silence say to my children?" The Prime Minister said he wants his children to feel safe, and that an attack on one is an attack on all. He did not name Walsall. He did not name Edinburgh. He did not name the march. He did not say the word. Now look at what this country does when it decides a threat is real. 29 April 2026. Two Jewish men stabbed in Golders Green. COBRA convened the same day. The Prime Minister visited the scene. Threat level raised to severe. A 100-officer task force deployed. This was the right response. It was correct. The threat was real. Antisemitism is real. The state moved. In Walsall, a family's home and car were destroyed with their children inside. No COBRA. No statement. No task force. No one will even name it. We are not asking for less protection for anyone. We are asking for the same. So when the children in that house ask if they are safe, there is an answer. West Midlands Police Report: Keep us alive: Substack: IG: Islamophia Exists

IslamophobiaUK

22,605 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад