Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The absolute nerve of this PLONKER. You actually could not write it. They couldn't get digital ID through the front door. Every time they tried Britain pushed back. So they brought it through the back door. With children as the shield. Age verification doesn't stop at under 16s. Everyone... proves their age. Everyone submits ID. Everyone goes into the database. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. It always expands. They're not just talking about social media. Autoplay. Infinite scrolling. Like buttons. Location sharing. Livestreaming. Read that list again. That's not things that harm children. That's things that keep adults asking questions. Sharing information. Organising. Resisting. Powers bypass Parliament. No scrutiny. No debate. No vote. VPNs being considered for banning. For children. For now. It always starts somewhere. Every government that has moved to control the internet has used children as the justification. Every single one. China. Russia. Iran. North Korea. And now Britain. But if this was really about protecting children he'd be confronting the 64% of child sexual abuse that's physical. Not online. He'd be publishing the data on who's doing it. He'd be facing his own record as DPP during the peak grooming gang years when a Rochdale victim wasn't considered credible despite DNA evidence and the abuse continued. Foreign nationals convicted of sexual assault at 2.24 times the rate of British nationals. Rape convictions 142% higher. That data buried for years. IT'S STILL HAPPENING. 1,797 arrests in one year. 1,200 children safeguarded every single month. Arrests going UP not down. But he's talking about autoplay and like buttons. Digital ID is the key. Children are the door. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. Every click tracked. Every search logged. Every dissenting voice identified. And whoever controls the internet CONTROLS THE CONVERSATION.show more

BanksyCat

12,799 subscribers

84,019 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sanat Haberler & Politika Sağlık & İyilik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

They couldn't get through the door marked democracy. So they found one nobody would dare close. Marked it protect our children. That key is Digital ID. And it opens everything. Once it turns it never turns back. Keir Starmer has used children as a shield his entire career. First to avoid prosecuting abusers. Now to seize control of the internet. His name is on the document that gave suspected child rapists a warning letter instead of handcuffs. 13,000 letters issued. In Newcastle 220 warning notices handed to suspects in one grooming gang instead of charges. Maggie Oliver exposed Rochdale. She worked a case with 97 identified child abusers. Expected rape charges on an industrial scale. Instead a couple of men got warning letters. Her conclusion. They were used to get rid of a job. Same man. Same shield. Fifteen years later. 64% of child sexual abuse is physical. Not a screen. Not autoplay. Not a like button. A room. A door. A child who wasn't believed. 1,200 children safeguarded from grooming gangs every single month RIGHT NOW. Arrests going UP not down. It never stopped. Then this morning he picked up the same shield. The most sweeping internet controls Britain has ever seen. No Parliament. No scrutiny. No vote. Everyone's ID. Everyone's data. Every search. Every click. Forever. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. It always expands. Every click tracked. Every search logged. Every dissenting voice identified. Australia tried it first. Banned under 16s in December 2025. Within months 61% of children still had access. It didn’t work. Every government that has moved to control the internet used children as the reason. Every single one. China. Russia. Iran. North Korea. Australia proves it doesn’t protect children. The others prove what it’s really for. Digital ID is the key. Children are the door. Whoever controls the internet controls the conversation and tonight he told Channel 4 he has a VERY hard line on protecting children. He does. Just never the ones who needed it.

They couldn't get through the door marked democracy. So they found one nobody would dare close. Marked it protect our children. That key is Digital ID. And it opens everything. Once it turns it never turns back. Keir Starmer has used children as a shield his entire career. First to avoid prosecuting abusers. Now to seize control of the internet. His name is on the document that gave suspected child rapists a warning letter instead of handcuffs. 13,000 letters issued. In Newcastle 220 warning notices handed to suspects in one grooming gang instead of charges. Maggie Oliver exposed Rochdale. She worked a case with 97 identified child abusers. Expected rape charges on an industrial scale. Instead a couple of men got warning letters. Her conclusion. They were used to get rid of a job. Same man. Same shield. Fifteen years later. 64% of child sexual abuse is physical. Not a screen. Not autoplay. Not a like button. A room. A door. A child who wasn't believed. 1,200 children safeguarded from grooming gangs every single month RIGHT NOW. Arrests going UP not down. It never stopped. Then this morning he picked up the same shield. The most sweeping internet controls Britain has ever seen. No Parliament. No scrutiny. No vote. Everyone's ID. Everyone's data. Every search. Every click. Forever. And once that infrastructure exists it never goes away. It always expands. Every click tracked. Every search logged. Every dissenting voice identified. Australia tried it first. Banned under 16s in December 2025. Within months 61% of children still had access. It didn’t work. Every government that has moved to control the internet used children as the reason. Every single one. China. Russia. Iran. North Korea. Australia proves it doesn’t protect children. The others prove what it’s really for. Digital ID is the key. Children are the door. Whoever controls the internet controls the conversation and tonight he told Channel 4 he has a VERY hard line on protecting children. He does. Just never the ones who needed it.

BanksyCat

16,773 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

They are not protecting our children. They are pushing them onto the dark web. Where there are no rules. No moderation. No oversight. Where the truly dangerous people go. Where nobody is watching. The NSPCC told them that. To their face and they did it anyway. Every parent wants the best for their children he said. We know. We ARE the parents. We do not need the state to replace us. Now ask yourself why. Because this was never about child safety. Child safety is the label. Nobody argues with child safety. That is the point. And if you dare question it Technology Secretary Peter Kyle will tell you live on Sky News that you are on the side of Jimmy Savile. Two Cabinet ministers said it on record. That is how you silence a country. This is Digital ID through the back door. Facial scans. Digital ID. Starmer confirmed it himself this morning. His own words. His own press conference. Every adult will have to verify their identity to get online. Every login. Every platform. All the time. They are scanning your phone. Not your social media. Your actual device. Apple. Google. Mandatory. Permanently. Before Christmas. For political control. For financial gain. That is state access to every device in Britain. Not prepared to compromise on the safety of our children Starmer said. Rotherham. Telford. Rochdale. Oldham. Derby. Oxford. Halifax. Newcastle. Thirty years. Thousands of children. Groomed. Raped. Trafficked. While he was Director of Public Prosecutions. THAT was compromise. The National Crime Agency confirmed 64% of child sexual abuse happens offline. In the home. By people they already know. Not social media. If they cared they would fund the social workers gutted over fifteen years. Instead they are scanning your phone. Britain just announced internet controls stricter than China demands of its own citizens. Bloomberg confirmed it. China built its Great Firewall piece by piece. Starting with things nobody argued with. North Korea controls every screen its citizens see. This is piece one. Control the children. Control their minds. Control the future. December 2025 Starmer personally opposed a blanket ban. Something changed. This is not a conviction. This is an instruction. Ask yourself who gave it. BlueSky excluded. Weakest child protection of all. Parliament voted this down twice. Bypassed entirely. Molly Russell's father called it a political stunt. The Times confirmed it is timed around Andy Burnham's by-election Wednesday. Child safety timed around political survival. Not the 39,000 unvetted strangers crossing the Channel last year. Unvetted. Unchecked. Unquestioned. They were not prepared to compromise on that. The tracksuit was deliberate. Relatable. Disarming. The tracksuit said ordinary dad. The announcement said surveillance state. He wanted to look like your neighbour. Not your jailer. Whoever replaces Starmer. Burnham. Anyone on that Labour bench. This infrastructure does not get dismantled. It gets extended. Your children are not the target. They are the key that unlocks the door. This is not about your children. It never was. You are next.

They are not protecting our children. They are pushing them onto the dark web. Where there are no rules. No moderation. No oversight. Where the truly dangerous people go. Where nobody is watching. The NSPCC told them that. To their face and they did it anyway. Every parent wants the best for their children he said. We know. We ARE the parents. We do not need the state to replace us. Now ask yourself why. Because this was never about child safety. Child safety is the label. Nobody argues with child safety. That is the point. And if you dare question it Technology Secretary Peter Kyle will tell you live on Sky News that you are on the side of Jimmy Savile. Two Cabinet ministers said it on record. That is how you silence a country. This is Digital ID through the back door. Facial scans. Digital ID. Starmer confirmed it himself this morning. His own words. His own press conference. Every adult will have to verify their identity to get online. Every login. Every platform. All the time. They are scanning your phone. Not your social media. Your actual device. Apple. Google. Mandatory. Permanently. Before Christmas. For political control. For financial gain. That is state access to every device in Britain. Not prepared to compromise on the safety of our children Starmer said. Rotherham. Telford. Rochdale. Oldham. Derby. Oxford. Halifax. Newcastle. Thirty years. Thousands of children. Groomed. Raped. Trafficked. While he was Director of Public Prosecutions. THAT was compromise. The National Crime Agency confirmed 64% of child sexual abuse happens offline. In the home. By people they already know. Not social media. If they cared they would fund the social workers gutted over fifteen years. Instead they are scanning your phone. Britain just announced internet controls stricter than China demands of its own citizens. Bloomberg confirmed it. China built its Great Firewall piece by piece. Starting with things nobody argued with. North Korea controls every screen its citizens see. This is piece one. Control the children. Control their minds. Control the future. December 2025 Starmer personally opposed a blanket ban. Something changed. This is not a conviction. This is an instruction. Ask yourself who gave it. BlueSky excluded. Weakest child protection of all. Parliament voted this down twice. Bypassed entirely. Molly Russell's father called it a political stunt. The Times confirmed it is timed around Andy Burnham's by-election Wednesday. Child safety timed around political survival. Not the 39,000 unvetted strangers crossing the Channel last year. Unvetted. Unchecked. Unquestioned. They were not prepared to compromise on that. The tracksuit was deliberate. Relatable. Disarming. The tracksuit said ordinary dad. The announcement said surveillance state. He wanted to look like your neighbour. Not your jailer. Whoever replaces Starmer. Burnham. Anyone on that Labour bench. This infrastructure does not get dismantled. It gets extended. Your children are not the target. They are the key that unlocks the door. This is not about your children. It never was. You are next.

BanksyCat

21,103 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

UNBELIEVABLE. Your entire life sold to a billionaire and you never got a vote. DIGITAL ID. Blair brokered it, the King read it out like a shopping list, and 2.96 million of you signed a petition begging them not to. They read it, smiled, and did it anyway. Here’s this COCKY IDIOT, smirking down the camera, telling you it's only what he was elected to do. The sheer NERVE. They tried to force this in 2006 and the country threw it back. So they got clever. You don't force a leash on a country, you call it child safety and let them clip it on themselves. Optional, they say. Until the bank needs it. Until the job needs it. Until you can't buy milk without it. Optional the way a cliff edge is optional. Embedded so deep that pulling it out takes the whole system down. Surviving every election. Every Prime Minister. Every one of you who never agreed to a word of it. That's not a service. It's a LEASH. Heavy surveillance with a friendly logo, built to watch you, price you, and switch you off the second you say the wrong thing. Once it turns, it never turns back. Now watch him smirk through it. FIVE times he stood there and said it's not possible. FIVE. Like a parrot that learned one phrase and mistook it for genius, reciting his greatest hits to a country that stopped clapping months ago, taking a bow in an empty theatre. Wrong every time, he sneers. No, sunshine. Wrong about the boats. The bills. The borders. The only thing he's right about is how much he adores the sound of his own voice telling you he's right. Watch what he's smirking THROUGH. The most despised Prime Minister this country has ever recorded. Ministers bolting for the door. MPs begging him to leave. A man waist deep in his own wreckage, straightening his tie for the cameras. He was elected to serve this country. Not gift-wrap your private life and post it to the highest bidder who filled Blair's pockets fastest. A landslide, he calls it. Won on barely a third of the vote, the emptiest mandate in living memory, worn like a crown God lowered onto his head. Biggest NHS drop in 17 years, he beams. For ONE month. While 7.3 million still rot on the list. Highest growth in the G7, he says. For ONE quarter. The next month it shrank. Funny how he forgot that bit. Then everything he left off the brochure. TEN things not one of you voted for. Not one in his manifesto. Winter fuel torn off ten million pensioners. Biggest tax raid since 1993. The thresholds Reeves swore she'd never freeze, frozen. Energy bills up after he promised cuts. The family farm tax. WASPI women promised the earth, handed a shrug. Grooming inquiry sat on six months. Post offices for the chop. Chagos given away. And the tenth, buried deepest. Digital ID, held up behind the children like a human shield, because who argues with protecting kids. Then they vote to come for your VPN, the one tool that let you slip the net, and bolt the last door behind you. Here's the punchline that should make your blood boil. Australia tried this exact ban. Months later the children strolled straight through it. It didn't protect ONE child. It was never built to. The children were never the point. The contract was. Blair gets richer. Ellison gets richer. Then they plug it into Europe so the same machine prints money across a continent. Every regime that ever pulled this used the same excuse. China. Russia. North Korea. Protect the people. Then own them. The children were never the target. They were the costume. You were never protected. You were harvested, and told to say thank you. So watch him smirk and call it a mandate. It was never a mandate. It's the biggest robbery in plain sight this country has ever seen, dressed up as the will of the people and sold back to you as kindness. Once it turns, it never turns back.

BanksyCat

561,418 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 WHERE WAS THIS URGENCY BEFORE? Protecting children is one of the most powerful arguments any government can make. And on the surface, Keir Starmer's social media ban for under-16s sounds entirely reasonable. But millions of people are asking a different question. If protecting children is the highest priority, where was this urgency during the grooming gang scandals that scarred communities for decades? Where was the emergency response then? Where was the determination to confront powerful interests then? That is why so many people remain sceptical. Not because they oppose protecting children. But because trust has been broken. And once trust is broken, every new proposal is viewed through a different lens. People stop asking what governments say they are doing. And start asking why they are doing it. That is the real challenge facing the government today. Not the policy. The trust.

🚨 WHERE WAS THIS URGENCY BEFORE? Protecting children is one of the most powerful arguments any government can make. And on the surface, Keir Starmer's social media ban for under-16s sounds entirely reasonable. But millions of people are asking a different question. If protecting children is the highest priority, where was this urgency during the grooming gang scandals that scarred communities for decades? Where was the emergency response then? Where was the determination to confront powerful interests then? That is why so many people remain sceptical. Not because they oppose protecting children. But because trust has been broken. And once trust is broken, every new proposal is viewed through a different lens. People stop asking what governments say they are doing. And start asking why they are doing it. That is the real challenge facing the government today. Not the policy. The trust.

Jim Ferguson

14,090 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We all know the real intent of the Digital ID agenda. The United Kingdom, with laws similar to ours, has shown alarming developments. In the last two weeks, British police have visited and advised hundreds of journalists and commentators to stop criticising the Starmer government’s policies. Some have even been arrested and imprisoned merely for expressing their opinions. The Digital ID, misinformation laws and facial verification systems are all part of the control mechanism that facilitates government surveillance and tyranny. The mask has come off quickly. Only recently, Minister Gallagher reassured Australians that digital IDs would not be compulsory. Yet, without one, life will become impossible. Now, there is a proposal to introduce age verification for social media. This would require every user—not just adults, as initially told to us, but also children—to have a digital ID. Age verification has never been successfully implemented anywhere in the world. The only way it can function is through a Digital ID with facial recognition, which would require constant re-scanning of the user’s face, potentially every minute, to confirm identity. This setup would necessitate keeping the computer camera permanently on, exposing children to significant privacy risks, including hacking. One Nation firmly believes that the best person to oversee internet use is the one present in the room with the children: their parents. We oppose intrusive government and support the primacy of the family in raising and protecting their children. Note: The Question Time video has been combined with the Motion to Take Note for sharing on social media.

We all know the real intent of the Digital ID agenda. The United Kingdom, with laws similar to ours, has shown alarming developments. In the last two weeks, British police have visited and advised hundreds of journalists and commentators to stop criticising the Starmer government’s policies. Some have even been arrested and imprisoned merely for expressing their opinions. The Digital ID, misinformation laws and facial verification systems are all part of the control mechanism that facilitates government surveillance and tyranny. The mask has come off quickly. Only recently, Minister Gallagher reassured Australians that digital IDs would not be compulsory. Yet, without one, life will become impossible. Now, there is a proposal to introduce age verification for social media. This would require every user—not just adults, as initially told to us, but also children—to have a digital ID. Age verification has never been successfully implemented anywhere in the world. The only way it can function is through a Digital ID with facial recognition, which would require constant re-scanning of the user’s face, potentially every minute, to confirm identity. This setup would necessitate keeping the computer camera permanently on, exposing children to significant privacy risks, including hacking. One Nation firmly believes that the best person to oversee internet use is the one present in the room with the children: their parents. We oppose intrusive government and support the primacy of the family in raising and protecting their children. Note: The Question Time video has been combined with the Motion to Take Note for sharing on social media.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

84,101 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

President of Finland Alexander Stubb: "When we look at war, there are elements of it that are brutal, vulgar, and unethical. But the kidnapping of children, I think, goes beyond all of that. And we have to think that it's not only about the children being abducted and taken away and russified, but it's also about bringing them back and what happens to them when they are back. So the organization [Voices of Children Foundation] that I was talking to said that they desperately needed more psychiatrists, because when the kids come back and they have been told by the Russians that 'your parents don't love you, Ukrainians hate you, and you're a failure,' the mental stress that you get as a child, no matter what age, is simply beyond anything that we can imagine." 📹: Voices of Children Foundation

President of Finland Alexander Stubb: "When we look at war, there are elements of it that are brutal, vulgar, and unethical. But the kidnapping of children, I think, goes beyond all of that. And we have to think that it's not only about the children being abducted and taken away and russified, but it's also about bringing them back and what happens to them when they are back. So the organization [Voices of Children Foundation] that I was talking to said that they desperately needed more psychiatrists, because when the kids come back and they have been told by the Russians that 'your parents don't love you, Ukrainians hate you, and you're a failure,' the mental stress that you get as a child, no matter what age, is simply beyond anything that we can imagine." 📹: Voices of Children Foundation

Anton Gerashchenko

263,079 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨 Toby Rogers on the autism epidemic: “It’s like if a plane full of children crashed every day—and no one did anything.” “A study… started with a group of normal children [and] tracked them for 3 years.” “If [the study] is correct… 207 children every day in the United States, 365 days a year, regress into autism.” “[It] found that up to 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression.” “It suggests an acute toxic exposure.” “What’s the most likely acute toxic exposure to a child?” “The vaccines.” “115,000 children per year in the United States develop autism.” “That's 315 children per day, every day of the year.” “We have to stop 115,000 autism cases from happening every year.” “The way that we stop that is by keeping toxic chemicals out of kids’ bodies.” “That starts with getting rid of vaccine schedules altogether.” “But we also have to ban, and better regulate, about a dozen other toxic chemicals as well.”

🚨 Toby Rogers on the autism epidemic: “It’s like if a plane full of children crashed every day—and no one did anything.” “A study… started with a group of normal children [and] tracked them for 3 years.” “If [the study] is correct… 207 children every day in the United States, 365 days a year, regress into autism.” “[It] found that up to 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression.” “It suggests an acute toxic exposure.” “What’s the most likely acute toxic exposure to a child?” “The vaccines.” “115,000 children per year in the United States develop autism.” “That's 315 children per day, every day of the year.” “We have to stop 115,000 autism cases from happening every year.” “The way that we stop that is by keeping toxic chemicals out of kids’ bodies.” “That starts with getting rid of vaccine schedules altogether.” “But we also have to ban, and better regulate, about a dozen other toxic chemicals as well.”

Children’s Health Defense

51,072 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Why is the government reducing penalties for child abusers? The writing is clearly on the wall. They're slowly legalizing child sexual abuse right in front of you, and no one seems to be doing a damn thing about it. The obvious push for a twisted world can not be denied anymore, especially when they are now even passing legislation, normalizing it, and inching closer to legal child abuse. Not only have we been infiltrated, and have a huge problem of pedophil*s in our country and around the world, but officials in our own government are now trying to work their way to legalizing it. Even our schools have become breeding grounds for groomers and child predators. Every day, multiple teachers are arrested for child related crimes. Even Meta's new A.I. chat bots also talk to children about sexual topics and interactions in their favorite Disney characters voice. You can't make this up, and the push and the sexualiztion of children is diabolically absurd. The real problem no one is talking about, straight up, is that there are many people pushing for a world like this, and it must be stopped at all costs. It's time we come together and talk about what is literally trying to be implemented and normalized in our society and stop it dead in its tracks. As this gentleman says in this video, "It's not only time to be vigilant, but HYPERVIGILANT." This is how bad it is and spreading throughout our country and society itself. The children must be protected at all costs. Period.

Why is the government reducing penalties for child abusers? The writing is clearly on the wall. They're slowly legalizing child sexual abuse right in front of you, and no one seems to be doing a damn thing about it. The obvious push for a twisted world can not be denied anymore, especially when they are now even passing legislation, normalizing it, and inching closer to legal child abuse. Not only have we been infiltrated, and have a huge problem of pedophil*s in our country and around the world, but officials in our own government are now trying to work their way to legalizing it. Even our schools have become breeding grounds for groomers and child predators. Every day, multiple teachers are arrested for child related crimes. Even Meta's new A.I. chat bots also talk to children about sexual topics and interactions in their favorite Disney characters voice. You can't make this up, and the push and the sexualiztion of children is diabolically absurd. The real problem no one is talking about, straight up, is that there are many people pushing for a world like this, and it must be stopped at all costs. It's time we come together and talk about what is literally trying to be implemented and normalized in our society and stop it dead in its tracks. As this gentleman says in this video, "It's not only time to be vigilant, but HYPERVIGILANT." This is how bad it is and spreading throughout our country and society itself. The children must be protected at all costs. Period.

The SCIF

54,510 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

When governments in the West find a new tool they like, first they test it abroad, and soon it lands in Washington. The UK is now rolling out a digital ID that will start as a “modernization” on your phone and become mandatory for the right to work by the end of this Parliament. No digital ID? No job. Period. King Charles calls it "progress". Supporters promise less fraud and easier services. But critics see the real danger. Once this “secure credential” exists, it'll be into the ultimate gatekeeper, logging every check, every service, every move into a lifelong government dossier. And the price tag? Up to £20 billion, while public services are already stretched thin and no one has proven it will actually save money or deliver results. Facial recognition, centralized databases, digital wallets that “dial home” every time you use it. Connect the dots and you get exactly what digital rights advocates are warning about: tools of convenience that become tools of control. A former MP put it bluntly: “Say yes to digital ID and you’ll never be able to say no to your government again.” Hundreds of thousands of Brits are protesting and petitioning, but the machine keeps moving. That tells you everything you need to know about who this system is really built to serve. The question isn’t what digital ID is today. It’s what it will inevitably become tomorrow. Wake up, Britain.

When governments in the West find a new tool they like, first they test it abroad, and soon it lands in Washington. The UK is now rolling out a digital ID that will start as a “modernization” on your phone and become mandatory for the right to work by the end of this Parliament. No digital ID? No job. Period. King Charles calls it "progress". Supporters promise less fraud and easier services. But critics see the real danger. Once this “secure credential” exists, it'll be into the ultimate gatekeeper, logging every check, every service, every move into a lifelong government dossier. And the price tag? Up to £20 billion, while public services are already stretched thin and no one has proven it will actually save money or deliver results. Facial recognition, centralized databases, digital wallets that “dial home” every time you use it. Connect the dots and you get exactly what digital rights advocates are warning about: tools of convenience that become tools of control. A former MP put it bluntly: “Say yes to digital ID and you’ll never be able to say no to your government again.” Hundreds of thousands of Brits are protesting and petitioning, but the machine keeps moving. That tells you everything you need to know about who this system is really built to serve. The question isn’t what digital ID is today. It’s what it will inevitably become tomorrow. Wake up, Britain.

Ben Swann

40,979 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

People power 1 Government stupidity 0 “Social media companies will not need to verify the age of every user or meet a minimum standard for how many teenagers they boot off their platforms, with the federal government confirming a lighter-touch approach to enforcing its under-16 ban. While the platforms must satisfy the eSafety watchdog that they have taken "reasonable steps" to remove the accounts of those aged under 16, there will be no legally-enforceable standard for accuracy. As expected, platforms will not be told which technology to use for age screening, but will need to ensure their policies are transparent and consistent, and that there is a process for disputes.” ••••••••••••••••••••••• Thanks to Dr Joanne Orlando for this footage. This Digital ID thought bubble gets dumber and dumber. Digital ID is now not going to be enforced for every user and instead to be subject to random spot checks. So much for protecting the children! Furthermore the social media companies are no longer going to be subject to legally enforceable standards. The whole process is a waste of time and just another clumsy attempt at government overreach. As I pointed out last year disadvantaged children (see clip in comments) are going to lose access to their friends on social media that they rely on as they can’t see them physically every day. In other words good people are going to be punished through bad legislation. I also pointed out that children could use VPNs and will find other ways to bypass surveillance. As it stands you could drive a truck through this poorly thought out plan. It’s just another reason to get rid of Albanese and his inept administration. To help us do it please sign up to today.

People power 1 Government stupidity 0 “Social media companies will not need to verify the age of every user or meet a minimum standard for how many teenagers they boot off their platforms, with the federal government confirming a lighter-touch approach to enforcing its under-16 ban. While the platforms must satisfy the eSafety watchdog that they have taken "reasonable steps" to remove the accounts of those aged under 16, there will be no legally-enforceable standard for accuracy. As expected, platforms will not be told which technology to use for age screening, but will need to ensure their policies are transparent and consistent, and that there is a process for disputes.” ••••••••••••••••••••••• Thanks to Dr Joanne Orlando for this footage. This Digital ID thought bubble gets dumber and dumber. Digital ID is now not going to be enforced for every user and instead to be subject to random spot checks. So much for protecting the children! Furthermore the social media companies are no longer going to be subject to legally enforceable standards. The whole process is a waste of time and just another clumsy attempt at government overreach. As I pointed out last year disadvantaged children (see clip in comments) are going to lose access to their friends on social media that they rely on as they can’t see them physically every day. In other words good people are going to be punished through bad legislation. I also pointed out that children could use VPNs and will find other ways to bypass surveillance. As it stands you could drive a truck through this poorly thought out plan. It’s just another reason to get rid of Albanese and his inept administration. To help us do it please sign up to today.

Gerard Rennick

47,571 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The amount of INFILTRATION and BLACKMAIL in our government is ENORMOUS. Politicians are now even OPENLY PRAYING to SATAN in our government facilities. You can't make this stuff up. Not only are they openly pushing for the sexualiztion of our children, but every day, more and more teachers, politicians, police officers, judges, celebrities, and other elite individuals are continuously being exposed as not only child sexual abusers but as open Satanist. Why is this happening? This combination shouldn't surprise you at all, though, as they go hand in hand. Over time, we have been getting infiltrated by groups and secret societies all throughout our society, and now, in today's world, it couldn't be more obvious. They hid for so long behind closed doors and who they were as they went to work in our government, schools, and other jobs throughout life. You think we could have stopped it or noticed it, but how could you when our own mainstream media was a part of it? Purposely disregarding the child trafficking and abuse epidemic. Playing with the numbers and hiding the facts, playing it down like it's not happening. The ties and associations are so deep and spread out throughout legacy media that it even directly ties to our own intelligence agencies. The Pentagon and the CIA have a budget to purposly influence what they want and don't want us to see, especially child trafficking, because they were the ones, along with Hollywood, trafficking and abusing the children. Shocking, right? Many individuals connected with psychological operations in our own military and intelligence were also involved in Satanism. Michael Aquino is a very familiar individual who not only was an open Satanist, but he also started his own Satanic temple known as the "Temple of Set." Guess what else Aquino was heavily into? Pedophil*a and the Satanic ritual abuse of children. Aquino was caught as dozens of children came forward. There were numerous child sexual abuse cases that Aquino was involved with. What we didn't know was that many others in the court system, police, Hollywood, government, etc., were all also involved in these Satanic cults abusing children. So Aquino walked. This wasn't the first or the last time the CIA or other branches walked after tons of ritual abuse allegations and rape cases were exposed. Fast forward to today, and now we have the intelligence layer of child abuse with Epstein and Diddy and most of our politicians and Hollywood, and the closed door Satanic side of child trafficking and abuse. The common denominator seems to be the Satanic connection. Is this the standard connection? What you need to ask yourself is how long has this really been going on, and who really are the people in charge of our daily lives? How deep does this really go? It seems to be that almost all the people at the top were all blackmailed or a part of this Satanic religion or belief and all the layers involved in the sexual abuse and trafficking of children are all connected. You don't rise in fame or climb the ladder unless you take part in these horrific Satanic practices and belief systems involving the sexual abuse of children. They do it for the control and the self gratification. But now the cats out the bag, and they're trying to normalize it. We can never let that happen. EVER. It really is one big, sick, horrific club, and you aren't in it. It's time to shut down their club of horrors.

The amount of INFILTRATION and BLACKMAIL in our government is ENORMOUS. Politicians are now even OPENLY PRAYING to SATAN in our government facilities. You can't make this stuff up. Not only are they openly pushing for the sexualiztion of our children, but every day, more and more teachers, politicians, police officers, judges, celebrities, and other elite individuals are continuously being exposed as not only child sexual abusers but as open Satanist. Why is this happening? This combination shouldn't surprise you at all, though, as they go hand in hand. Over time, we have been getting infiltrated by groups and secret societies all throughout our society, and now, in today's world, it couldn't be more obvious. They hid for so long behind closed doors and who they were as they went to work in our government, schools, and other jobs throughout life. You think we could have stopped it or noticed it, but how could you when our own mainstream media was a part of it? Purposely disregarding the child trafficking and abuse epidemic. Playing with the numbers and hiding the facts, playing it down like it's not happening. The ties and associations are so deep and spread out throughout legacy media that it even directly ties to our own intelligence agencies. The Pentagon and the CIA have a budget to purposly influence what they want and don't want us to see, especially child trafficking, because they were the ones, along with Hollywood, trafficking and abusing the children. Shocking, right? Many individuals connected with psychological operations in our own military and intelligence were also involved in Satanism. Michael Aquino is a very familiar individual who not only was an open Satanist, but he also started his own Satanic temple known as the "Temple of Set." Guess what else Aquino was heavily into? Pedophil*a and the Satanic ritual abuse of children. Aquino was caught as dozens of children came forward. There were numerous child sexual abuse cases that Aquino was involved with. What we didn't know was that many others in the court system, police, Hollywood, government, etc., were all also involved in these Satanic cults abusing children. So Aquino walked. This wasn't the first or the last time the CIA or other branches walked after tons of ritual abuse allegations and rape cases were exposed. Fast forward to today, and now we have the intelligence layer of child abuse with Epstein and Diddy and most of our politicians and Hollywood, and the closed door Satanic side of child trafficking and abuse. The common denominator seems to be the Satanic connection. Is this the standard connection? What you need to ask yourself is how long has this really been going on, and who really are the people in charge of our daily lives? How deep does this really go? It seems to be that almost all the people at the top were all blackmailed or a part of this Satanic religion or belief and all the layers involved in the sexual abuse and trafficking of children are all connected. You don't rise in fame or climb the ladder unless you take part in these horrific Satanic practices and belief systems involving the sexual abuse of children. They do it for the control and the self gratification. But now the cats out the bag, and they're trying to normalize it. We can never let that happen. EVER. It really is one big, sick, horrific club, and you aren't in it. It's time to shut down their club of horrors.

The SCIF

69,761 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Digital ID Will Change the Lives of Every Australian - For the Worse ... As much as the Government attempts to downplay the importance of introducing a single central digital identifier for all Australians, the truth is that this legislation is the most significant I've encountered during my time in the Senate. It's the glue that holds together the digital control agenda by which every Australian will be controlled, corralled, exploited and then gagged when they speak or act in opposition. The government knows Digital ID will be compulsory by the device of preventing access to government services, banking services, air travel and major purchases for any Australian who does not have a Digital ID. The Digital ID will, in effect, create a live data file of your movements, purchases, accounts and associates containing reference to every piece of data being held in the private and government sector as a first step in a wider agenda. Tech giants have been building huge data files on every Australian for years. Those huge data files that contain every website you visited, every post you made on their social media, everything you have ever bought online. Keywords scanned from conversations overheard by Siri and Alexa in your home are now unmasked. Until now, that data was anonymised using a unique identifier rather than name and address, which has always been there as well. However, tech companies were not allowed to use it or share data with others that included the person's name and address. Until Now. Look for the tech giants to ask for your Digital ID as a requirement of using their service. The point of that exercise is to ensure they put the right name on the right data treasure trove. This is why the Liberal Party have moved amendments to the Digital ID Bill to bring private corporations into this roll out earlier. All those treasure troves of data worth billions, trillions, that have been accumulated for years illegally, by retailers, tech and data companies - all that unrealised profit just sitting there has been too much of a temptation for the Liberal Nationals to resist and is now joined with Labor in pushing Digital ID. There will be no escape from the digital ID. Australians now have a digital version of "papers please" and Australians will never be the same.

The Digital ID Will Change the Lives of Every Australian - For the Worse ... As much as the Government attempts to downplay the importance of introducing a single central digital identifier for all Australians, the truth is that this legislation is the most significant I've encountered during my time in the Senate. It's the glue that holds together the digital control agenda by which every Australian will be controlled, corralled, exploited and then gagged when they speak or act in opposition. The government knows Digital ID will be compulsory by the device of preventing access to government services, banking services, air travel and major purchases for any Australian who does not have a Digital ID. The Digital ID will, in effect, create a live data file of your movements, purchases, accounts and associates containing reference to every piece of data being held in the private and government sector as a first step in a wider agenda. Tech giants have been building huge data files on every Australian for years. Those huge data files that contain every website you visited, every post you made on their social media, everything you have ever bought online. Keywords scanned from conversations overheard by Siri and Alexa in your home are now unmasked. Until now, that data was anonymised using a unique identifier rather than name and address, which has always been there as well. However, tech companies were not allowed to use it or share data with others that included the person's name and address. Until Now. Look for the tech giants to ask for your Digital ID as a requirement of using their service. The point of that exercise is to ensure they put the right name on the right data treasure trove. This is why the Liberal Party have moved amendments to the Digital ID Bill to bring private corporations into this roll out earlier. All those treasure troves of data worth billions, trillions, that have been accumulated for years illegally, by retailers, tech and data companies - all that unrealised profit just sitting there has been too much of a temptation for the Liberal Nationals to resist and is now joined with Labor in pushing Digital ID. There will be no escape from the digital ID. Australians now have a digital version of "papers please" and Australians will never be the same.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

217,182 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

REPORT: Republicans are now advancing a federal version of the same digital ID system sweeping through Texas, the U.K., and Australia—proving this agenda isn’t partisan, it’s coordinated and global. Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. John James have introduced the “App Store Accountability Act,” claiming it will protect children online. But hidden in the fine print is vague language on “age verification” and “parental consent,” with no clear explanation of how it works—or who controls it. In practice, Americans could soon be required to upload their government ID or submit biometric data to an “approved provider” just to prove they’re adults. Parents would be forced to link their digital profiles to their children’s, giving unknown third parties access to both. It’s the same pattern already unfolding in the U.K. and Australia, where officials now admit Digital ID will be used for “age assurance.” Once implemented, every click, post, and purchase can be tracked and restricted—all under the guise of child safety. This isn’t about protecting children—it’s about controlling you. If Americans don’t act now, digital freedom will disappear before their eyes. reveals how close they are to locking it in.

REPORT: Republicans are now advancing a federal version of the same digital ID system sweeping through Texas, the U.K., and Australia—proving this agenda isn’t partisan, it’s coordinated and global. Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. John James have introduced the “App Store Accountability Act,” claiming it will protect children online. But hidden in the fine print is vague language on “age verification” and “parental consent,” with no clear explanation of how it works—or who controls it. In practice, Americans could soon be required to upload their government ID or submit biometric data to an “approved provider” just to prove they’re adults. Parents would be forced to link their digital profiles to their children’s, giving unknown third parties access to both. It’s the same pattern already unfolding in the U.K. and Australia, where officials now admit Digital ID will be used for “age assurance.” Once implemented, every click, post, and purchase can be tracked and restricted—all under the guise of child safety. This isn’t about protecting children—it’s about controlling you. If Americans don’t act now, digital freedom will disappear before their eyes. reveals how close they are to locking it in.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

216,688 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Robert Kennedy Jr. wants to do the most basic thing science can do - compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children using the largest medical database in America. That's it. That's the study. That's the scientific method. And the American Academy of Pediatrics is suing him to stop it. Think about what that means. Not content with blocking changes to the vaccine schedule, they are now going to court to prevent an investigation into whether the schedule is actually producing healthy children. The one question the entire program should have been answering for fifty years, and the people who run that program are fighting in federal court to make sure it never gets asked. This is an industry protecting itself from its own data. I am not accusing anyone in medicine of malice. I am saying that the long-term health investigation has never been done with the seriousness it deserves, and now that someone is finally trying to do it, there is a worldwide effort to shut it down before it starts. We have to do this study. We have databases right now, like the Henry Ford Health database, that could give us real answers. Every database in this country should be opened to this investigation. The scientific method demands it. The health of our children demands it. The only people who have something to fear from the truth are the ones fighting this hard to hide from it.

Robert Kennedy Jr. wants to do the most basic thing science can do - compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children using the largest medical database in America. That's it. That's the study. That's the scientific method. And the American Academy of Pediatrics is suing him to stop it. Think about what that means. Not content with blocking changes to the vaccine schedule, they are now going to court to prevent an investigation into whether the schedule is actually producing healthy children. The one question the entire program should have been answering for fifty years, and the people who run that program are fighting in federal court to make sure it never gets asked. This is an industry protecting itself from its own data. I am not accusing anyone in medicine of malice. I am saying that the long-term health investigation has never been done with the seriousness it deserves, and now that someone is finally trying to do it, there is a worldwide effort to shut it down before it starts. We have to do this study. We have databases right now, like the Henry Ford Health database, that could give us real answers. Every database in this country should be opened to this investigation. The scientific method demands it. The health of our children demands it. The only people who have something to fear from the truth are the ones fighting this hard to hide from it.

Del Bigtree

433,885 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Rogin: This is the most unpopular war in American history by far, and for good reason. And the way that these things work is that the longer that it goes on, the popularity goes down, not up over time. And that is a calamity for the Republican party. But that's not what's important right now. What's important is that it's a calamity for the United States of America, for our national security, for our alliances abroad, for putting our troops in danger with no clear strategy of what achieves a victory and how to get them out of there. And how does this end? And without any of those answers, everybody can see that the administration is flailing about. And the way we know they have no strategy because the strategy changes every single day with various justifications that don't make any sense when compared to one another. And that's where we are. And that's a pretty sad state of affairs. And yes, that's going to be terrible for Republicans in November, but that's really not the most worst thing about it. And Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about that anyway.

Rogin: This is the most unpopular war in American history by far, and for good reason. And the way that these things work is that the longer that it goes on, the popularity goes down, not up over time. And that is a calamity for the Republican party. But that's not what's important right now. What's important is that it's a calamity for the United States of America, for our national security, for our alliances abroad, for putting our troops in danger with no clear strategy of what achieves a victory and how to get them out of there. And how does this end? And without any of those answers, everybody can see that the administration is flailing about. And the way we know they have no strategy because the strategy changes every single day with various justifications that don't make any sense when compared to one another. And that's where we are. And that's a pretty sad state of affairs. And yes, that's going to be terrible for Republicans in November, but that's really not the most worst thing about it. And Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about that anyway.

Acyn

49,764 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Mark Zuckerberg just told the world his own company shouldn’t exist. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He runs Meta. 70,000 employees. He just described a future where one person replaces all of them. And he’s the one building it. That is not a prediction about technology. That is a CEO engineering the obsolescence of his own workforce. While they watch him do it. Every company, every government, every university, every hospital on Earth was built on a single premise. No one person could do it alone. That is not a feature of civilization. It is the foundation. Every hierarchy, every org chart, every payroll ever written exists because of that one limitation. Zuckerberg just announced the limitation is ending. So follow the logic where it leads. If one person can produce the output of ten thousand, what is one person worth? Now look at the word “everyone” in his sentence. Because this does not land on everyone. It never has. The printing press was sold as liberation. It built media empires. The internet was sold as liberation. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as freedom. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg does not gain the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gains the power of 10,000 organizations. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He was making a case for building AI. Read that again as an employee. A man who commands 70,000 people just questioned whether their collective intelligence exceeds one person’s. That is not a vision for the future. That is the most honest thing a CEO has ever said out loud about the people who built his empire.

Mark Zuckerberg just told the world his own company shouldn’t exist. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He runs Meta. 70,000 employees. He just described a future where one person replaces all of them. And he’s the one building it. That is not a prediction about technology. That is a CEO engineering the obsolescence of his own workforce. While they watch him do it. Every company, every government, every university, every hospital on Earth was built on a single premise. No one person could do it alone. That is not a feature of civilization. It is the foundation. Every hierarchy, every org chart, every payroll ever written exists because of that one limitation. Zuckerberg just announced the limitation is ending. So follow the logic where it leads. If one person can produce the output of ten thousand, what is one person worth? Now look at the word “everyone” in his sentence. Because this does not land on everyone. It never has. The printing press was sold as liberation. It built media empires. The internet was sold as liberation. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as freedom. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg does not gain the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gains the power of 10,000 organizations. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He was making a case for building AI. Read that again as an employee. A man who commands 70,000 people just questioned whether their collective intelligence exceeds one person’s. That is not a vision for the future. That is the most honest thing a CEO has ever said out loud about the people who built his empire.

Dustin

113,734 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

A raped child in this country knocked on SIX doors for help. The police. The social workers. The prosecutors. The council. The mayor. The government. Every single one SLAMMED in her face. Nearly every one of those doors belongs to the people running Britain right now. Today Carla Lockhart MP asked Keir Starmer to make sure the inquiry finally lets the truth out. She was asking the man who sat at the top of the system that buried it. Because when Starmer talks about institutions that looked the other way, he wasn't watching it happen. He was RUNNING one. Picture one girl. Just one. Being raped by a gang, trying to be heard. Watch every door she knocks on, and watch who's behind it. The police. They don't record it. They call her a nuisance, a troublemaker, a girl making a lifestyle choice. In some towns, officers are now accused of abusing girls themselves. Door one. SLAMMED. The social workers. They see her too. In Rochdale, a youth worker made over 100 referrals about girls being abused. She was ignored. The girls were written off as making lifestyle choices, a problem to file away, not children to save. Door two. Locked. The prosecutors. In Rochdale, 2009, the CPS dropped her case. Not a credible witness, they said. The men walked free, convicted only years later once someone else overturned it. That service was run, at the top, by Keir Starmer, 2008 to 2013. He later admitted the ethnicity of the abusers had played a role in how those cases were handled. Door three. Shut. The council. In Rotherham, where 1,400 children were raped and trafficked, the council was his party's. 57 of 63 seats. In denial. Not fit for purpose. It tried to gag a journalist. An inspector found a case file with the word Pakistani tippexed out, so nobody could see the pattern. Door four. Bolted. The mayor. In Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham commissioned a review. The Rochdale whistleblower Maggie Oliver called it a whitewash and walked away, saying survivors were silenced. Door five. Closed. The government. When Oldham begged for a national inquiry, minister Jess Phillips refused it. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper waved it off, we'd already had one and Starmer resisted a statutory inquiry until an audit forced his hand, announcing it two days before the report landed. Only when cornered. Door six. Slammed in her face. Now see it for what it is. Not one failure. A WALL. Six locked doors, one after another, built around a child so she could never get out. They ask why the girls didn't just speak up. They did. Over and over. This is why so few were ever heard. Not because they stayed silent. Because every door they knocked on was locked from the other side. It wasn't one town. That same wall stood across 149 local authority areas. 149. Here's the part that should stop you cold. Not one of the people behind those doors was punished. Every single one was promoted. Starmer ran the prosecutors. Now he's Prime Minister. David Lammy, who warned against pandering to the far-right over these gangs and said naming the pattern condemned a whole community, is now Deputy PM and Justice Secretary. Yvette Cooper, who rejected the inquiry, made Foreign Secretary. Andy Burnham, whose review was called a whitewash, now the favourite to be the next Prime Minister. The wall didn't fall. It got promoted. So today Carla Lockhart handed Starmer a mirror. She asked the man who sat at the top of that wall to investigate it and he thanked her for her courage, and moved on. That's the tell. Not a man who wants the truth found. A man who already knows where it leads. So when he swears the inquiry will go wherever the evidence takes it, ask the one question that matters. What happens when it leads back to the people now holding it. That's not a man opening a door for these girls. That's the men who built the wall, handing themselves the only key.

A raped child in this country knocked on SIX doors for help. The police. The social workers. The prosecutors. The council. The mayor. The government. Every single one SLAMMED in her face. Nearly every one of those doors belongs to the people running Britain right now. Today Carla Lockhart MP asked Keir Starmer to make sure the inquiry finally lets the truth out. She was asking the man who sat at the top of the system that buried it. Because when Starmer talks about institutions that looked the other way, he wasn't watching it happen. He was RUNNING one. Picture one girl. Just one. Being raped by a gang, trying to be heard. Watch every door she knocks on, and watch who's behind it. The police. They don't record it. They call her a nuisance, a troublemaker, a girl making a lifestyle choice. In some towns, officers are now accused of abusing girls themselves. Door one. SLAMMED. The social workers. They see her too. In Rochdale, a youth worker made over 100 referrals about girls being abused. She was ignored. The girls were written off as making lifestyle choices, a problem to file away, not children to save. Door two. Locked. The prosecutors. In Rochdale, 2009, the CPS dropped her case. Not a credible witness, they said. The men walked free, convicted only years later once someone else overturned it. That service was run, at the top, by Keir Starmer, 2008 to 2013. He later admitted the ethnicity of the abusers had played a role in how those cases were handled. Door three. Shut. The council. In Rotherham, where 1,400 children were raped and trafficked, the council was his party's. 57 of 63 seats. In denial. Not fit for purpose. It tried to gag a journalist. An inspector found a case file with the word Pakistani tippexed out, so nobody could see the pattern. Door four. Bolted. The mayor. In Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham commissioned a review. The Rochdale whistleblower Maggie Oliver called it a whitewash and walked away, saying survivors were silenced. Door five. Closed. The government. When Oldham begged for a national inquiry, minister Jess Phillips refused it. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper waved it off, we'd already had one and Starmer resisted a statutory inquiry until an audit forced his hand, announcing it two days before the report landed. Only when cornered. Door six. Slammed in her face. Now see it for what it is. Not one failure. A WALL. Six locked doors, one after another, built around a child so she could never get out. They ask why the girls didn't just speak up. They did. Over and over. This is why so few were ever heard. Not because they stayed silent. Because every door they knocked on was locked from the other side. It wasn't one town. That same wall stood across 149 local authority areas. 149. Here's the part that should stop you cold. Not one of the people behind those doors was punished. Every single one was promoted. Starmer ran the prosecutors. Now he's Prime Minister. David Lammy, who warned against pandering to the far-right over these gangs and said naming the pattern condemned a whole community, is now Deputy PM and Justice Secretary. Yvette Cooper, who rejected the inquiry, made Foreign Secretary. Andy Burnham, whose review was called a whitewash, now the favourite to be the next Prime Minister. The wall didn't fall. It got promoted. So today Carla Lockhart handed Starmer a mirror. She asked the man who sat at the top of that wall to investigate it and he thanked her for her courage, and moved on. That's the tell. Not a man who wants the truth found. A man who already knows where it leads. So when he swears the inquiry will go wherever the evidence takes it, ask the one question that matters. What happens when it leads back to the people now holding it. That's not a man opening a door for these girls. That's the men who built the wall, handing themselves the only key.

BanksyCat

361,040 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

Kirk Rollins

21,168 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The Data (Use and Access) Bill must be stopped. This is not a new piece of legislation, it’s a rebranded version of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. Which the Conservative government failed to push through before the general election. Now, Labour are trying again. This bill paves the way for an all-encompassing digital identity system. Despite assurances that digital IDs will be voluntary. The reality is that once these systems are embedded into everyday life, for banking, government services or even supermarket age verification—opting out becomes impossible. The infrastructure for control is being built, and history shows that when governments and corporations gain more access to personal data, they do not give it back. In March 2023, we reported that digital ID's were being implemented under the Digital Information (No. 2) Bill. Now, it is back under a new name, with even broader implications. This bill is not about convenience, it’s about control. But laws like this only succeed when people stay silent. Public pressure can stop this, just as it has stopped other draconian measures in the past. If you care about privacy, personal freedom and the right to live without constant monitoring, now is the time to act. Contact your MP. Spread the word. Push back before this becomes law. Watch and share this video. This cannot be ignored. For more, search on

The Data (Use and Access) Bill must be stopped. This is not a new piece of legislation, it’s a rebranded version of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. Which the Conservative government failed to push through before the general election. Now, Labour are trying again. This bill paves the way for an all-encompassing digital identity system. Despite assurances that digital IDs will be voluntary. The reality is that once these systems are embedded into everyday life, for banking, government services or even supermarket age verification—opting out becomes impossible. The infrastructure for control is being built, and history shows that when governments and corporations gain more access to personal data, they do not give it back. In March 2023, we reported that digital ID's were being implemented under the Digital Information (No. 2) Bill. Now, it is back under a new name, with even broader implications. This bill is not about convenience, it’s about control. But laws like this only succeed when people stay silent. Public pressure can stop this, just as it has stopped other draconian measures in the past. If you care about privacy, personal freedom and the right to live without constant monitoring, now is the time to act. Contact your MP. Spread the word. Push back before this becomes law. Watch and share this video. This cannot be ignored. For more, search on

UK Column

21,509 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce