Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

They didn’t have “a video.” They had a video system. Multiple cameras. Multiple angles. Multiple time windows. So when MSP only puts forward one selected angle and the public is told to accept a narrow slice while the period from MIDNIGHT TO 6 a.m. is missing, excluded, corrupted, overwritten,... or simply not offered, that is not a small detail. That is the whole ballgame. In a death investigation involving a Boston police officer, outside a house tied to law enforcement families, with witnesses coming and going, phones moving, vehicles moving, and later disputes over who was where and when… “We only saved one angle” is not comforting. It is alarming. If nothing happened between midnight and 6 a.m., then the missing video would be boring. And boring video is still evidence. So why don’t we get to see the boring part?” They didn’t just give us video. They gave us a curated exhibit. One angle. One slice. One version. And somehow the six most important hours of the night are the hours we’re not supposed to worry about.” Who decided which angle mattered — and when did they decide the other angles didn’t?show more

Dixie Normus

8,206 subscribers

16,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Doug Burgum on 8647 in the grass on the mall: “They didn't mow it. They used chemicals to kill the grass, which is a form of vandalism, and, we did not have cameras on that either. “They came during the night, and, unfortunately, we're that one is going to remain a mystery.”

Doug Burgum on 8647 in the grass on the mall: “They didn't mow it. They used chemicals to kill the grass, which is a form of vandalism, and, we did not have cameras on that either. “They came during the night, and, unfortunately, we're that one is going to remain a mystery.”

Katie Miller

52,568 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

‼️ZELENSKYY: They began this war. When we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line. ————————————————— ZELENSKYY: One month ago marked the anniversary of one of the greatest tragedies — the Chernobyl disaster. And, we build a big museum, to honor the people who saved others’ lives — the Chernobyl Museum. And we showed it to the world — but today they destroyed it totally. The missile attacked that and several, buildings. So we are really thankful to our heroic savers and to our people. Yes, DSNS, huh? Yeah. And to policemen. So they help. Rescuers. To rescuers and et cetera, yes. And also they attacked hospitals and attacked kindergartens and schools. So what do we have to do to… JOURNALIST: Russia said it was a retaliation from the previous attacks. ZELENSKYY: They always say that. And it's not true. They understand that we always respond. They began this war, so it's not the question who is the first or who is the second. They began this war. And the most important thing, when we see that when we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line.

‼️ZELENSKYY: They began this war. When we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line. ————————————————— ZELENSKYY: One month ago marked the anniversary of one of the greatest tragedies — the Chernobyl disaster. And, we build a big museum, to honor the people who saved others’ lives — the Chernobyl Museum. And we showed it to the world — but today they destroyed it totally. The missile attacked that and several, buildings. So we are really thankful to our heroic savers and to our people. Yes, DSNS, huh? Yeah. And to policemen. So they help. Rescuers. To rescuers and et cetera, yes. And also they attacked hospitals and attacked kindergartens and schools. So what do we have to do to… JOURNALIST: Russia said it was a retaliation from the previous attacks. ZELENSKYY: They always say that. And it's not true. They understand that we always respond. They began this war, so it's not the question who is the first or who is the second. They began this war. And the most important thing, when we see that when we respond, we target their military goals. When they do attacks, they kill civilians. We’re not at the front line.

Kateryna Lisunova

115,700 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨ICE and Border Patrol agents are once again threatening U.S. citizens for exercising their constitutional rights… this time in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, agents swarm a car belonging to a U.S. citizen who is doing nothing more than observing them… which is a protected First Amendment right. Instead of respecting the Constitution, they start barking threats: “This is your one and only warning to quit obstructing us.” The driver calmly responds, “I’m not obstructing you.” Then one agent delivers the line that sums up the whole problem: “This is your one warning, you will be arrested for impeding.” They’re not being impeded. They’re being watched…. and they don’t like that the public is finally paying attention. This is what happens when agencies with a long record of abuse realize people know their rights: they lash out, they threaten, and they try to intimidate citizens into silence. But, observing law enforcement is not a crime. Threatening Americans for doing it absolutely is.

🚨ICE and Border Patrol agents are once again threatening U.S. citizens for exercising their constitutional rights… this time in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, agents swarm a car belonging to a U.S. citizen who is doing nothing more than observing them… which is a protected First Amendment right. Instead of respecting the Constitution, they start barking threats: “This is your one and only warning to quit obstructing us.” The driver calmly responds, “I’m not obstructing you.” Then one agent delivers the line that sums up the whole problem: “This is your one warning, you will be arrested for impeding.” They’re not being impeded. They’re being watched…. and they don’t like that the public is finally paying attention. This is what happens when agencies with a long record of abuse realize people know their rights: they lash out, they threaten, and they try to intimidate citizens into silence. But, observing law enforcement is not a crime. Threatening Americans for doing it absolutely is.

Jesus Freakin Congress

160,321 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Pam Bondi said the Epstein prison video resets every night and every video should have the same minute missing. So why did this one need to be stitched from two clips, edited in Premiere, and saved four times before release? Bondi: “There was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video. … So, every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing.”

Pam Bondi said the Epstein prison video resets every night and every video should have the same minute missing. So why did this one need to be stitched from two clips, edited in Premiere, and saved four times before release? Bondi: “There was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video. … So, every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing.”

Grace Chong, MBI

22,585 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Interesting turn of events with Nancy Guthrie case (mother of NBC host kidnapping) The woman the FBI got the Nest camera footage from didn’t have a Premium subscription Yet without a subscription, even being disabled, it was able to record and store footage “We are tracked, they are listening, they are watching, we are being recorded” What’s happening is even if you don’t have a subscription Google is recording and storing the footage from your doorbell camera, but you can only access it without a subscription You think it’s not being recorded and stored, but it is…. Even with the camera disabled, it was recording footage and able to be recovered… “Nancy Guthrie had a Nest camera, which is owned by Google, and law enforcement initially believed the doorbell footage was lost and said Nancy Guthrie did not have a premium subscription to access video from her doorbell camera — Now, according to Google, if a Nest camera is disabled, it can still record up to three hours of event video history without a subscription. So many are wondering, why did it take so long for this video to be released? Well, it takes time for authorities to basically recover this video from Google servers, since Nancy Guthrie did not have a premium subscription that offers special features for video history. And essentially, video is continuously recorded and saved with a subscription, but without a subscription, video is saved until it's overwritten. In this case, they thought because there was no subscription, it would have been erased and recorded over because it would be sort of a continuous situation. And then that's the real issue here. Look, we live in a surveillance economy and as much as we'd like to think that we can delete things and things will go away, and there are some apps that in fact make things go away, the truth of the matter is that we are tracked, They are listening, they are watching, we are being recorded.”

Interesting turn of events with Nancy Guthrie case (mother of NBC host kidnapping) The woman the FBI got the Nest camera footage from didn’t have a Premium subscription Yet without a subscription, even being disabled, it was able to record and store footage “We are tracked, they are listening, they are watching, we are being recorded” What’s happening is even if you don’t have a subscription Google is recording and storing the footage from your doorbell camera, but you can only access it without a subscription You think it’s not being recorded and stored, but it is…. Even with the camera disabled, it was recording footage and able to be recovered… “Nancy Guthrie had a Nest camera, which is owned by Google, and law enforcement initially believed the doorbell footage was lost and said Nancy Guthrie did not have a premium subscription to access video from her doorbell camera — Now, according to Google, if a Nest camera is disabled, it can still record up to three hours of event video history without a subscription. So many are wondering, why did it take so long for this video to be released? Well, it takes time for authorities to basically recover this video from Google servers, since Nancy Guthrie did not have a premium subscription that offers special features for video history. And essentially, video is continuously recorded and saved with a subscription, but without a subscription, video is saved until it's overwritten. In this case, they thought because there was no subscription, it would have been erased and recorded over because it would be sort of a continuous situation. And then that's the real issue here. Look, we live in a surveillance economy and as much as we'd like to think that we can delete things and things will go away, and there are some apps that in fact make things go away, the truth of the matter is that we are tracked, They are listening, they are watching, we are being recorded.”

Wall Street Apes

255,091 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I upset the Orthobros on here when I posted that the Wilsons aren’t Christian. They said “how dare you declare whether or not someone is a Christian!” Here is my response (watch til the end for the most ironic part of all of this): Scripture itself tells us that it is OBVIOUS who is saved and that we can discern who is and who is not a child of God. “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are OBVIOUS: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister.” 1 John 3:10 Yes, Christians will still continue to sin, as Romans 7 tell us. Sanctification is certainly messy, there’s no denying that. But someone who has been supernaturally made new by the Holy Spirit will have a real heart change. Regeneration is not an inconsequential experience. It will be obvious to people. The supernatural work of the Holy Spirit is a powerful one. Someone who is made a child of God will bear the family resemblance. No one can be born again and continue to comfortably stay in the mud with the pigs. They might occasionally still fall into the mud, they might still have dirt on their clothes even after they get up, but they will hate it when they do and will live in a humble manner before God crying “have mercy on me, a sinner.” They will pursue righteousness and have a deep deep love for others. And when they are confronted about their sin by others, they repent. So yes, we can look at someone living in a hateful unrighteous arrogant manner for years on end, even after being confronted about it, and determine that they are not of the Lord.

I upset the Orthobros on here when I posted that the Wilsons aren’t Christian. They said “how dare you declare whether or not someone is a Christian!” Here is my response (watch til the end for the most ironic part of all of this): Scripture itself tells us that it is OBVIOUS who is saved and that we can discern who is and who is not a child of God. “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are OBVIOUS: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister.” 1 John 3:10 Yes, Christians will still continue to sin, as Romans 7 tell us. Sanctification is certainly messy, there’s no denying that. But someone who has been supernaturally made new by the Holy Spirit will have a real heart change. Regeneration is not an inconsequential experience. It will be obvious to people. The supernatural work of the Holy Spirit is a powerful one. Someone who is made a child of God will bear the family resemblance. No one can be born again and continue to comfortably stay in the mud with the pigs. They might occasionally still fall into the mud, they might still have dirt on their clothes even after they get up, but they will hate it when they do and will live in a humble manner before God crying “have mercy on me, a sinner.” They will pursue righteousness and have a deep deep love for others. And when they are confronted about their sin by others, they repent. So yes, we can look at someone living in a hateful unrighteous arrogant manner for years on end, even after being confronted about it, and determine that they are not of the Lord.

Lizzie Marbach

45,620 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Last night I had a chat about FSD videos camera angles with Dirty Tesla and people said Whole Mars Catalog has one of the best 'angles' to watch. Well today we did a 4 hour road trip on V14.1.1 and I tried the new angle and I think it didn't workout, but I want to get an opinion from you all. Here's a quick sample - is it worth me editing the rest of this video or is the angle too low? 😟 If people will watch it I will edit the video

Last night I had a chat about FSD videos camera angles with Dirty Tesla and people said Whole Mars Catalog has one of the best 'angles' to watch. Well today we did a 4 hour road trip on V14.1.1 and I tried the new angle and I think it didn't workout, but I want to get an opinion from you all. Here's a quick sample - is it worth me editing the rest of this video or is the angle too low? 😟 If people will watch it I will edit the video

Devin Olsen

26,215 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Bondi on missing minute in the Epstein jailhouse tape: "The video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide. And there was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video, so every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing."

Bondi on missing minute in the Epstein jailhouse tape: "The video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide. And there was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video, so every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing."

Aaron Rupar

94,342 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The reason stans get so mad at the BeyHive and at Beyoncé, and try so hard to diminish her legacy, is because they cannot handle the fact that even with all the streams and sales their faves have over Beyoncé, they are still not rated above her 🤣🤣. They forget that Beyoncé being an artist from the 90s plays a huge role in that. So many of us became fans at a time when we didn’t know what Billboard charts were and didn’t care. It was an era where talent and impact were the real markers of an artist. That is why most of us don’t back down when they pull out streams or charts to downplay her achievements 😂😂. We genuinely do not care. So they resort to lies like “she is not known in this or that country” and then try to use streaming numbers as proof. Meanwhile, we still don’t care, because we don’t use streaming as a yardstick for anything. And that longevity Beyoncé has also trickles down to the GP cos she’s still in the public consciousness. It is why the jokes about “she’s not known here” never land. They will say it today and next week a locally respected figure from that country will reference her 😂. They just cannot connect the dots.

The reason stans get so mad at the BeyHive and at Beyoncé, and try so hard to diminish her legacy, is because they cannot handle the fact that even with all the streams and sales their faves have over Beyoncé, they are still not rated above her 🤣🤣. They forget that Beyoncé being an artist from the 90s plays a huge role in that. So many of us became fans at a time when we didn’t know what Billboard charts were and didn’t care. It was an era where talent and impact were the real markers of an artist. That is why most of us don’t back down when they pull out streams or charts to downplay her achievements 😂😂. We genuinely do not care. So they resort to lies like “she is not known in this or that country” and then try to use streaming numbers as proof. Meanwhile, we still don’t care, because we don’t use streaming as a yardstick for anything. And that longevity Beyoncé has also trickles down to the GP cos she’s still in the public consciousness. It is why the jokes about “she’s not known here” never land. They will say it today and next week a locally respected figure from that country will reference her 😂. They just cannot connect the dots.

IChooseViolence

323,306 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Keone Hon says banks and enterprises don’t want to build inside walled gardens. “When we talk to enterprises, when we talk to banks, one of the consistent things that we hear is that they care about not building in a walled garden.” “They care about not building inside of an ecosystem where there’s one anchor tenant who is going to end up preferencing themselves.” “They care about building on credibly neutral, decentralized environments like Ethereum or Monad.” “The real value Monad can deliver is a dependable, performant, well-engineered system.” “One that delivers a high degree of decentralization and is credibly neutral.” “Not just a centralized thing that is kind of run by one big company.”

Keone Hon says banks and enterprises don’t want to build inside walled gardens. “When we talk to enterprises, when we talk to banks, one of the consistent things that we hear is that they care about not building in a walled garden.” “They care about not building inside of an ecosystem where there’s one anchor tenant who is going to end up preferencing themselves.” “They care about building on credibly neutral, decentralized environments like Ethereum or Monad.” “The real value Monad can deliver is a dependable, performant, well-engineered system.” “One that delivers a high degree of decentralization and is credibly neutral.” “Not just a centralized thing that is kind of run by one big company.”

The Rollup

20,566 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Today is a bad day to be a propagandist — or to be Péter Szijjártó or Márton Nagy (and never really was). In 2023, when they awarded him a decoration and praised him with nice words, they could not yet suspect that today they would have to vilify one of the most successful Hungarians. Fortunately, it is not István Kapitány who has changed, but only the mafia that has started to fear even more.

Today is a bad day to be a propagandist — or to be Péter Szijjártó or Márton Nagy (and never really was). In 2023, when they awarded him a decoration and praised him with nice words, they could not yet suspect that today they would have to vilify one of the most successful Hungarians. Fortunately, it is not István Kapitány who has changed, but only the mafia that has started to fear even more.

Magyar Péter (Ne féljetek)

15,149 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

CNN chief law enforcement and intel analyst John Miller’s first reaction to the ICE officer’s cellphone video.... “Well, what stands out is a, it’s another angle that makes it helpful to start with. B, it’s the closest thing that we are going to have in all likelihood, to the near equivalent of a body cam for this officer because he’s not wearing a body cam. He’s shooting this with his phone handheld in one hand. He gives us a full 360 degree walk around the car, and as Chuck Ramsey said, you know, the first person seems to be saying, I’m not mad at you. And the second person saying, we don’t wear masks and we don’t change plates, and we’ll see you later. Not a highly tense situation, but at this moment here on the other side, they’re saying, out of the car, out of the car. Those are other agents, and then you see the car go into gear. It sounds like the car strikes the agent. We can’t see that because we know from the other angle two things are happening right then. Number one, the hand with the phone is going down, and number two, the hand with the gun is coming up. So, and it appears from that that angle that he takes these shots with one hand. So, I think we learned a lot from this video. Part of what we learned is we can’t make factual assumptions only from the other videos. You really have to look at all of them and come to some collective forensic judgment with those comparisons.”

CNN chief law enforcement and intel analyst John Miller’s first reaction to the ICE officer’s cellphone video.... “Well, what stands out is a, it’s another angle that makes it helpful to start with. B, it’s the closest thing that we are going to have in all likelihood, to the near equivalent of a body cam for this officer because he’s not wearing a body cam. He’s shooting this with his phone handheld in one hand. He gives us a full 360 degree walk around the car, and as Chuck Ramsey said, you know, the first person seems to be saying, I’m not mad at you. And the second person saying, we don’t wear masks and we don’t change plates, and we’ll see you later. Not a highly tense situation, but at this moment here on the other side, they’re saying, out of the car, out of the car. Those are other agents, and then you see the car go into gear. It sounds like the car strikes the agent. We can’t see that because we know from the other angle two things are happening right then. Number one, the hand with the phone is going down, and number two, the hand with the gun is coming up. So, and it appears from that that angle that he takes these shots with one hand. So, I think we learned a lot from this video. Part of what we learned is we can’t make factual assumptions only from the other videos. You really have to look at all of them and come to some collective forensic judgment with those comparisons.”

Curtis Houck

479,035 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

ENTITLED Abby Phillip doesn't understand why you need to show your ID to vote. "Why can't we ask the government to do what they have the ability to do, which is to verify people's citizenship? Why is the onus on the person and not the government? Who is the keeper of the records? When you're applying to register to vote, you have to produce either an ID or a Social Security number. The government is the keeper of the records of who is eligible to vote and who is not, who is a citizen, and who is not. They then keep a database that's also part of the law, and they check against the database."

ENTITLED Abby Phillip doesn't understand why you need to show your ID to vote. "Why can't we ask the government to do what they have the ability to do, which is to verify people's citizenship? Why is the onus on the person and not the government? Who is the keeper of the records? When you're applying to register to vote, you have to produce either an ID or a Social Security number. The government is the keeper of the records of who is eligible to vote and who is not, who is a citizen, and who is not. They then keep a database that's also part of the law, and they check against the database."

DeVory Darkins

23,836 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Washington, DC | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "It is a fact that often countries do not take a position when some other countries are victims of terrorism, which they would do when they themselves are. In that respect honestly, we have been much more consistent and principled. When terror attacks happen elsewhere outside India, we have largely followed the same position that we have taken when they have happened in India...Many of them are not doing it or not doing it sufficiently enough and part of diplomacy is to exhort them, encourage them, persuade them, motivate them to do that, and which is why it's important to speak up, and which is why it's important to carry them with us to the best possibility"

#WATCH | Washington, DC | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "It is a fact that often countries do not take a position when some other countries are victims of terrorism, which they would do when they themselves are. In that respect honestly, we have been much more consistent and principled. When terror attacks happen elsewhere outside India, we have largely followed the same position that we have taken when they have happened in India...Many of them are not doing it or not doing it sufficiently enough and part of diplomacy is to exhort them, encourage them, persuade them, motivate them to do that, and which is why it's important to speak up, and which is why it's important to carry them with us to the best possibility"

ANI

12,039 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If someone wants to argue “truth doesn’t evolve,” then that standard has to be applied evenly. Because here’s the issue with that statement, It focuses entirely on Karen Read’s wording over time while ignoring that multiple Commonwealth witnesses didn’t just “evolve” over years… Their stories shifted the moment video evidence contradicted them. That’s not memory fading over time. That’s real-time contradiction. There’s a difference between A person refining memory under stress and a witness maintaining certainty until footage shows something else then adjusting. If we’re going to say “Truth doesn’t change depending on the audience, pressure, or strategy.” Then that principle has to apply to Witnesses who testified they didn’t see someone, Witnesses who said they were somewhere Witnesses whose timing didn’t line up, and Witnesses whose movements didn’t match surveillance. Because when security footage shows something different, and the explanation becomes “It must be the clock.” “It must be the angle.” “It must be someone else.” Or their newest one..... “It doesn’t matter.” that’s evolution too people! And in some cases, it’s instantaneous evolution. You don’t get to scrutinize one person’s phrasing over three years while excusing others whose stories adjusted within days or even within the same proceeding when confronted with video. this isn’t about truth. It’s about selective scrutiny.

If someone wants to argue “truth doesn’t evolve,” then that standard has to be applied evenly. Because here’s the issue with that statement, It focuses entirely on Karen Read’s wording over time while ignoring that multiple Commonwealth witnesses didn’t just “evolve” over years… Their stories shifted the moment video evidence contradicted them. That’s not memory fading over time. That’s real-time contradiction. There’s a difference between A person refining memory under stress and a witness maintaining certainty until footage shows something else then adjusting. If we’re going to say “Truth doesn’t change depending on the audience, pressure, or strategy.” Then that principle has to apply to Witnesses who testified they didn’t see someone, Witnesses who said they were somewhere Witnesses whose timing didn’t line up, and Witnesses whose movements didn’t match surveillance. Because when security footage shows something different, and the explanation becomes “It must be the clock.” “It must be the angle.” “It must be someone else.” Or their newest one..... “It doesn’t matter.” that’s evolution too people! And in some cases, it’s instantaneous evolution. You don’t get to scrutinize one person’s phrasing over three years while excusing others whose stories adjusted within days or even within the same proceeding when confronted with video. this isn’t about truth. It’s about selective scrutiny.

Dixie Normus

18,011 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is one of the biggest differences I notice. The men who are most at ease in this area usually are not calmer by accident. They built a stronger life around themselves. They have work ethic. Interests. Responsibilities. Standards. Direction. Things they are building. Skills they are developing. Parts of themselves that have nothing to do with this one preference. That gives desire a container. And when desire has a healthy container, it stops taking over the whole inner world. In the full video, I talk about why having range matters so much, and why men who make one preference their whole identity almost always suffer more from shame, awkwardness, and over-identification. The full video is on YouTube if you want the deeper breakdown.

This is one of the biggest differences I notice. The men who are most at ease in this area usually are not calmer by accident. They built a stronger life around themselves. They have work ethic. Interests. Responsibilities. Standards. Direction. Things they are building. Skills they are developing. Parts of themselves that have nothing to do with this one preference. That gives desire a container. And when desire has a healthy container, it stops taking over the whole inner world. In the full video, I talk about why having range matters so much, and why men who make one preference their whole identity almost always suffer more from shame, awkwardness, and over-identification. The full video is on YouTube if you want the deeper breakdown.

Command Within | Build Self-Command

19,156 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 BONDI ON MISSING MINUTE IN EPSTEIN TAPE: “EVERY NIGHT THE VIDEO IS RESET” "The video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide. And there was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video. So every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing." Source: Aaron Rupar

🚨🇺🇸 BONDI ON MISSING MINUTE IN EPSTEIN TAPE: “EVERY NIGHT THE VIDEO IS RESET” "The video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide. And there was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video. So every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing." Source: Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

77,580 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Religion was and is still one of the major tools that was used to divide and destroy Africa. They told us they had the best and ours was wrong and while we were comparing and changing and dividing ourselves they were stealing our wealth. Now l am not telling to be or not be a Christian or Muslim. I don't care. All l want you to do is to think. If they did it to your forefathers and you still allow them to do it to you today, in this century of information and technology,then you are a bigger coward than those that sold us out in the past. #LiberateAfrica Now is the time to rise up, not tomorrow.

Religion was and is still one of the major tools that was used to divide and destroy Africa. They told us they had the best and ours was wrong and while we were comparing and changing and dividing ourselves they were stealing our wealth. Now l am not telling to be or not be a Christian or Muslim. I don't care. All l want you to do is to think. If they did it to your forefathers and you still allow them to do it to you today, in this century of information and technology,then you are a bigger coward than those that sold us out in the past. #LiberateAfrica Now is the time to rise up, not tomorrow.

Liberate Africa

24,791 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Liberal Democrats And whilst no one would disagree that the US military has accomplished a tactical feat with its operation, we now hear from VP Vance that they didn’t even get the Uranium, they don’t know where it is, and they are not sure how much they have damaged the Iranian nuclear programme.

Liberal Democrats And whilst no one would disagree that the US military has accomplished a tactical feat with its operation, we now hear from VP Vance that they didn’t even get the Uranium, they don’t know where it is, and they are not sure how much they have damaged the Iranian nuclear programme.

Mike Martin MP 🔸

82,581 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr