Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

They´re doing girlfriend activities uwu Sound version tomorrow, I couldn't edit it today, but I don't want to delay on posting again x´d Erisa model: x_RedEyes 🔞 | (OPEN COMMISSIONS) Kimiko model: 𝔻𝕒𝕣𝕓𝕖𝕣 💚 #Fortnite #furryfortnite #furrygirl #furry #futanarivídeo #FUTA #ERiSA #KimikoFiveTails

MonsterArt

46,032 subscribers

56,226 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #Fortnite #furryfortnite #furrygirl #furry #futanarivídeo #FUTA #ERiSA #KimikoFiveTails

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Here is the first look of the Financial Model for Pakistan Stock Exchange we have built. At this moment, I don't know if it will be successful or not. Yet it's backtesting has given promising results. I believe it is real time and future testing that matters the most. To make it transparent, I will keep on updating on "X" the top picks from the Model. I request you not to invest a single money based on it's results because it is in the early stage. Every feedback from your side would be highly encouraged. The problem was that investors only see MARI, FFC, ,OGDC PPL, MEBL, Luck like companies because they are mainstream. But remember that there are 457 listed companies and there are some hidden gems that are usually missed by retail investors like us. One such example was SSOM that just exploded in few weeks. Thats why, the purpose of the model was to find those companies that have a lot of potential but are not covered by any brokerage house and yet there results are excellent. Based on this model, some time back, I added positions in companies like AGIL (Agri Autos) SPEL (Synthetic Papers ltd), NATF (National Foods), KSB Pumps, Treet. Because scores of all these companies is excellent. They remained stagnant for long time so my conviction on the model was also declining. But it were last two weeks that made a difference and so was my own conviction on this model. Big names like Wealth ⚡️ Wise Value Investor Doctor in PSX Tayyab 🇵🇰 are already aware of it. On Thursday I added HCAR. I will keep you updated just for testing purpose I again repeat not to invest. I will risk my own money. If it is successful, we intend to make a website where you all have access to this data. How it works and how to read it, I will explain it to you in a separate thread.

Here is the first look of the Financial Model for Pakistan Stock Exchange we have built. At this moment, I don't know if it will be successful or not. Yet it's backtesting has given promising results. I believe it is real time and future testing that matters the most. To make it transparent, I will keep on updating on "X" the top picks from the Model. I request you not to invest a single money based on it's results because it is in the early stage. Every feedback from your side would be highly encouraged. The problem was that investors only see MARI, FFC, ,OGDC PPL, MEBL, Luck like companies because they are mainstream. But remember that there are 457 listed companies and there are some hidden gems that are usually missed by retail investors like us. One such example was SSOM that just exploded in few weeks. Thats why, the purpose of the model was to find those companies that have a lot of potential but are not covered by any brokerage house and yet there results are excellent. Based on this model, some time back, I added positions in companies like AGIL (Agri Autos) SPEL (Synthetic Papers ltd), NATF (National Foods), KSB Pumps, Treet. Because scores of all these companies is excellent. They remained stagnant for long time so my conviction on the model was also declining. But it were last two weeks that made a difference and so was my own conviction on this model. Big names like Wealth ⚡️ Wise Value Investor Doctor in PSX Tayyab 🇵🇰 are already aware of it. On Thursday I added HCAR. I will keep you updated just for testing purpose I again repeat not to invest. I will risk my own money. If it is successful, we intend to make a website where you all have access to this data. How it works and how to read it, I will explain it to you in a separate thread.

Shayan Baig

57,429 views • 1 year ago

I knocked on 75 doors today and talked to 2 dozen voters today. After I explained to them what was at stake for this election in WI on April 1st. They told me immediately they are going to vote for Brad Schimel Team Schimel coming up. I also sent 235 postcards out this week to voters. I got another 165 postcards on hand. I just got my stamps today so the rest of that will be sent out this week. My business letters will be coming on Monday and Tuesday. I got 700 of them because I would love to add a personal touch to it because we have a lot on the line here in this election and I don't voters sitting at home. If the voters sit at home. It's a vote for Susan Crawford. I don't want that. I am putting a ton of urgency and effort into all of this. I did text 350 people this week and most of all of them are going to be voting for Schimel. I had a few liberals, but I just shrug it off because If their not gonna stop drinking the dems coolaid. I really can't help them. It's up to them. Ellis Dukehart just announce the Scott Presler's Early Vote Action is up and running again so everyone should be able to download the app and start doing what I am doing. I don't want WI to be the next Illinois. I don't want the democrats to wreck havoc and to put a fresh coat of blue paint on our state in the midterms and in 2028. I am doing all I can. I would love for you guys help. 🇺🇸 ❤️ ThePersistence I hope I made you proud today. I hope everyone at 🦺America Mission proud today. I hope I made Lauren Boebert proud today. 🇺🇸 💯 🔥 Tiffany Savage 🇺🇸

I knocked on 75 doors today and talked to 2 dozen voters today. After I explained to them what was at stake for this election in WI on April 1st. They told me immediately they are going to vote for Brad Schimel Team Schimel coming up. I also sent 235 postcards out this week to voters. I got another 165 postcards on hand. I just got my stamps today so the rest of that will be sent out this week. My business letters will be coming on Monday and Tuesday. I got 700 of them because I would love to add a personal touch to it because we have a lot on the line here in this election and I don't voters sitting at home. If the voters sit at home. It's a vote for Susan Crawford. I don't want that. I am putting a ton of urgency and effort into all of this. I did text 350 people this week and most of all of them are going to be voting for Schimel. I had a few liberals, but I just shrug it off because If their not gonna stop drinking the dems coolaid. I really can't help them. It's up to them. Ellis Dukehart just announce the Scott Presler's Early Vote Action is up and running again so everyone should be able to download the app and start doing what I am doing. I don't want WI to be the next Illinois. I don't want the democrats to wreck havoc and to put a fresh coat of blue paint on our state in the midterms and in 2028. I am doing all I can. I would love for you guys help. 🇺🇸 ❤️ ThePersistence I hope I made you proud today. I hope everyone at 🦺America Mission proud today. I hope I made Lauren Boebert proud today. 🇺🇸 💯 🔥 Tiffany Savage 🇺🇸

Matthew Zimmerman 🇺🇸

639,003 views • 1 year ago

Drew: "What do you think my thing is?" Melody: "Your social game." D: "Is it? How?" M: "Mr. Play Both Sides. Pisses me off that you made it this far doing that, not gonna lie." D: "Why?" M: "Cuz you deserve to go home for that. Playing both sides never works, why did it work for you?" D: "It worked for Barrett too." M: "Yeah fuck both of you guys." D: "I feel like you target me and blame me for so much but Barrett was doing the same thing." M: "Because Barrett was never my #1 ally, like what? What part of that don't you fucking comprehend?..." D: "But you're still here and I'm still here. Now you're in my HOH room and you're not on the block. I sound like a great ally." M: "Bro you did one thing correct, do you want a fucking medal?" D: "Are you offering?" M: "No." D: "If you were then I would like one." M: "You wouldn't get one. They don't give out stupid ass medal awards." #BB28 #BBBitez

Drew: "What do you think my thing is?" Melody: "Your social game." D: "Is it? How?" M: "Mr. Play Both Sides. Pisses me off that you made it this far doing that, not gonna lie." D: "Why?" M: "Cuz you deserve to go home for that. Playing both sides never works, why did it work for you?" D: "It worked for Barrett too." M: "Yeah fuck both of you guys." D: "I feel like you target me and blame me for so much but Barrett was doing the same thing." M: "Because Barrett was never my #1 ally, like what? What part of that don't you fucking comprehend?..." D: "But you're still here and I'm still here. Now you're in my HOH room and you're not on the block. I sound like a great ally." M: "Bro you did one thing correct, do you want a fucking medal?" D: "Are you offering?" M: "No." D: "If you were then I would like one." M: "You wouldn't get one. They don't give out stupid ass medal awards." #BB28 #BBBitez

Big Brother Bitez 🔊

193,977 views • 22 days ago

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

Daniel Jeffries

21,386 views • 1 year ago

Nikki Glaser says she'd rather let her husband sleep with another woman than watch TV and text with her “I don't care if a guy has a sexual connection with a girl and like he was to use protection and just have sex with her for a night. Like I don't, I literally wouldn't care if my husband did that. "I don't, I don't know why. I don't know why.” “If he were to like watch The Wire with her or like do crossword puzzles or like text, like send memes and stuff, I would be like, ‘What the fuck are you doing? Like that's our thing.’" "Like emotional cheating would hurt me, but like physical, I'm just like, I kind of, I just feel like I understand how sex is for men most of the time outside of relationship." "It's just kind of transactional and it's just like they just want a nut and it's not about like, ‘I want to spend my life with this woman.’ So it wouldn't feel, I just, I don't know. I, I just wouldn't care as much.” Alex Cooper: “So your barometer is no emotional cheating.” Nikki Glaser: “Yeah. Totally. Physically cheating is good. But I understand emotional cheating, like if something were to happen where I would want them to tell me about it. "I would be obviously hurt, but I would understand being drawn to someone else that you have a good connection with because it's like it's hard to, when you just find someone and it's monogamy, your brain doesn't turn off.” “He's still going to be attracted to other women. He's still going to like be interested in other girls and have good conversations and stuff." "So, I could see something developing and I would be heartbroken that it happened, especially if it went on without me knowing about it, but I would, I would always ask anyone I was with to be like, ‘If you develop feelings for someone else, tell me and we'll deal with it.’ Like I just don't want to be blindsided.” “But, if you want to have sex with someone else, also tell me about it cuz I want to like see what she looks like and like ask you about it.” Alex Cooper: “Okay, wait. Hold on. So, do you identify as like poly or like open relationship, really?” Nikki Glaser: “Like another girlfriend. I don't want, and I don't want to like be in bed with you guys together." "I don't want to be in the chair in the corner like cuckolded, like, you know, like watching my boyfriend. I just want to hear about it later.”

Sensitive content

Nikki Glaser says she'd rather let her husband sleep with another woman than watch TV and text with her “I don't care if a guy has a sexual connection with a girl and like he was to use protection and just have sex with her for a night. Like I don't, I literally wouldn't care if my husband did that. "I don't, I don't know why. I don't know why.” “If he were to like watch The Wire with her or like do crossword puzzles or like text, like send memes and stuff, I would be like, ‘What the fuck are you doing? Like that's our thing.’" "Like emotional cheating would hurt me, but like physical, I'm just like, I kind of, I just feel like I understand how sex is for men most of the time outside of relationship." "It's just kind of transactional and it's just like they just want a nut and it's not about like, ‘I want to spend my life with this woman.’ So it wouldn't feel, I just, I don't know. I, I just wouldn't care as much.” Alex Cooper: “So your barometer is no emotional cheating.” Nikki Glaser: “Yeah. Totally. Physically cheating is good. But I understand emotional cheating, like if something were to happen where I would want them to tell me about it. "I would be obviously hurt, but I would understand being drawn to someone else that you have a good connection with because it's like it's hard to, when you just find someone and it's monogamy, your brain doesn't turn off.” “He's still going to be attracted to other women. He's still going to like be interested in other girls and have good conversations and stuff." "So, I could see something developing and I would be heartbroken that it happened, especially if it went on without me knowing about it, but I would, I would always ask anyone I was with to be like, ‘If you develop feelings for someone else, tell me and we'll deal with it.’ Like I just don't want to be blindsided.” “But, if you want to have sex with someone else, also tell me about it cuz I want to like see what she looks like and like ask you about it.” Alex Cooper: “Okay, wait. Hold on. So, do you identify as like poly or like open relationship, really?” Nikki Glaser: “Like another girlfriend. I don't want, and I don't want to like be in bed with you guys together." "I don't want to be in the chair in the corner like cuckolded, like, you know, like watching my boyfriend. I just want to hear about it later.”

crest.

867,102 views • 20 days ago

Donghae’s solo was strongly encouraged by Hyukjae 🥹🩷 #DONGHAE #EUNHYUK #동해 #은혁 👧🏻: What made you want to release a solo album? 🐯: The fans probably already know, but since I'm running a company with Eunhyuk now, on the plane ride back after a concert, Eunhyuk suddenly said to me, "There’s something I want to tell you... I want to release a solo album, is that okay?" I said, "If you want to do it, of course you should, I’ll support you 💪🏻." He started working very hard on the album. At the time, he was preparing both a Korean and a Japanese album together, but they had to be finished within two or three months. Watching him, I thought it was truly too difficult, and the schedule was very tight. 👧🏻: After all, you were right there by his side watching him. 🐯: I also went to his MV filming site, and it looked incredibly exhausting. After the promotions ended, Eunhyuk said to me, "You should try a solo once too. I tried it and found it very fun~." But Eunhyuk is naturally good at variety shows, so I replied, "I don't want to, I don't want to. Let's just do D&E 🥺." He said, "Just try it once~ try it! I’ve done it, and at our company, since I’ve gone solo, you should go solo too!" 👧🏻:So Eunhyuk was the one who started pushing for it~ 🐯: I thought, "Should I try it once? Okay, I'll try!" It turned out to be super tiring, so I told the fans, "This might be the last time... I'll finish this well and won't release a solo again after this." But once it actually came out, I found it very fun. 👧🏻: Exactly! 🐯: So I might change my mind too. At the moment I said I didn't want to do it, it was truly exhausting, but after doing it, I realized it’s actually okay 😆. Cr _ode.eunhae_

Donghae’s solo was strongly encouraged by Hyukjae 🥹🩷 #DONGHAE #EUNHYUK #동해 #은혁 👧🏻: What made you want to release a solo album? 🐯: The fans probably already know, but since I'm running a company with Eunhyuk now, on the plane ride back after a concert, Eunhyuk suddenly said to me, "There’s something I want to tell you... I want to release a solo album, is that okay?" I said, "If you want to do it, of course you should, I’ll support you 💪🏻." He started working very hard on the album. At the time, he was preparing both a Korean and a Japanese album together, but they had to be finished within two or three months. Watching him, I thought it was truly too difficult, and the schedule was very tight. 👧🏻: After all, you were right there by his side watching him. 🐯: I also went to his MV filming site, and it looked incredibly exhausting. After the promotions ended, Eunhyuk said to me, "You should try a solo once too. I tried it and found it very fun~." But Eunhyuk is naturally good at variety shows, so I replied, "I don't want to, I don't want to. Let's just do D&E 🥺." He said, "Just try it once~ try it! I’ve done it, and at our company, since I’ve gone solo, you should go solo too!" 👧🏻:So Eunhyuk was the one who started pushing for it~ 🐯: I thought, "Should I try it once? Okay, I'll try!" It turned out to be super tiring, so I told the fans, "This might be the last time... I'll finish this well and won't release a solo again after this." But once it actually came out, I found it very fun. 👧🏻: Exactly! 🐯: So I might change my mind too. At the moment I said I didn't want to do it, it was truly exhausting, but after doing it, I realized it’s actually okay 😆. Cr _ode.eunhae_

byeol_별

32,193 views • 5 months ago

50% of my consulting work right now is helping companies use open-source models at scale. Everyone knows how to use an open-source LLM on their computers, but it's really hard to do this at scale for thousands of users. Here is how this plays out: 1. A team builds a prototype using DeepSeek. 2. Everything looks good. It works! 3. They follow an online guide to deploy the model online. 4. They ask 10 users to try the app. 5. Latency spikes everywhere. 6. The entire system halts. 7. They blame DeepSeek and try again using a new model. The problem is always with scaling inference, not the model. Here is one recommendation I give companies: Check out Nebius Token Factory if you don't want to ever think about deploying an open-source model again. This is a managed inference platform for deploying open-source LLMs at scale. This is not for prototypes or research experiments. This is for when you have a real application with real users. Three important notes about Token Factory: • You have complete control over how inference runs. • You have predictable tail latency (P99, not averages). • No surprise costs when you scale up. You can preplan your budget. Check it out here: Here are two codes you can use to get 100 hours of GPU usage on me: ymJLFa2ARYSKEdqb AdckcZaYjm7KqYY7 Thanks to the Nebius team for their continuous partnership.

50% of my consulting work right now is helping companies use open-source models at scale. Everyone knows how to use an open-source LLM on their computers, but it's really hard to do this at scale for thousands of users. Here is how this plays out: 1. A team builds a prototype using DeepSeek. 2. Everything looks good. It works! 3. They follow an online guide to deploy the model online. 4. They ask 10 users to try the app. 5. Latency spikes everywhere. 6. The entire system halts. 7. They blame DeepSeek and try again using a new model. The problem is always with scaling inference, not the model. Here is one recommendation I give companies: Check out Nebius Token Factory if you don't want to ever think about deploying an open-source model again. This is a managed inference platform for deploying open-source LLMs at scale. This is not for prototypes or research experiments. This is for when you have a real application with real users. Three important notes about Token Factory: • You have complete control over how inference runs. • You have predictable tail latency (P99, not averages). • No surprise costs when you scale up. You can preplan your budget. Check it out here: Here are two codes you can use to get 100 hours of GPU usage on me: ymJLFa2ARYSKEdqb AdckcZaYjm7KqYY7 Thanks to the Nebius team for their continuous partnership.

Santiago

48,605 views • 7 months ago

David Friedberg: Frontier Models are Training on Your Novel Insights as “De-Identified Data” @jason: “Should they trust any of these LLMs with their proprietary knowledge for fear of having it cribbed into a core LLM?” david friedberg: “I have had experiences where we've asked some fairly novel scientific questions, and (the AI model) identifies it as a novel insight. It's like, ‘Oh, never thought about that, interesting, blah, blah, blah.’ And then using a different account, asking the next version (of the model) later, I've now experienced this. It's like, ‘Oh, well, you could do this,’ and it actually just describes this exact thing that we had in our chat in the previous version. Now, these are a handful of anecdotal experiences, but I know the domain that we work in, and the niche of it, and the ideation of this stuff, and the novelty of this stuff, and the lack of papers being published, and so on. So I know that there isn't some new corpus of information out there that's training the new model. So all I can say at that point is that my conversation or our analyses have been used for training.” David Sacks: “Okay, this does raise a really good question. What does it mean that the model is allowed to train on unidentifiable data?” Friedberg: “Well, that's my point. So it doesn't use any of my personal information, but it can use an insight derived from our chat, which it can then say is some training data that is unrelated. But the truth is, it's actually a piece of IP that's our organization’s IP, and our engagement back and forth. We don't have any NDA or confidentiality provisions or protections with them being a service provider back to us. This is why I care a lot about open source because I don't want them having my chat logs because they can use it for training to create an IP advantage that is now diffused to the rest of the market.”

David Friedberg: Frontier Models are Training on Your Novel Insights as “De-Identified Data” @jason: “Should they trust any of these LLMs with their proprietary knowledge for fear of having it cribbed into a core LLM?” david friedberg: “I have had experiences where we've asked some fairly novel scientific questions, and (the AI model) identifies it as a novel insight. It's like, ‘Oh, never thought about that, interesting, blah, blah, blah.’ And then using a different account, asking the next version (of the model) later, I've now experienced this. It's like, ‘Oh, well, you could do this,’ and it actually just describes this exact thing that we had in our chat in the previous version. Now, these are a handful of anecdotal experiences, but I know the domain that we work in, and the niche of it, and the ideation of this stuff, and the novelty of this stuff, and the lack of papers being published, and so on. So I know that there isn't some new corpus of information out there that's training the new model. So all I can say at that point is that my conversation or our analyses have been used for training.” David Sacks: “Okay, this does raise a really good question. What does it mean that the model is allowed to train on unidentifiable data?” Friedberg: “Well, that's my point. So it doesn't use any of my personal information, but it can use an insight derived from our chat, which it can then say is some training data that is unrelated. But the truth is, it's actually a piece of IP that's our organization’s IP, and our engagement back and forth. We don't have any NDA or confidentiality provisions or protections with them being a service provider back to us. This is why I care a lot about open source because I don't want them having my chat logs because they can use it for training to create an IP advantage that is now diffused to the rest of the market.”

The All-In Podcast

54,050 views • 10 days ago

Gavin Baker: "I think Anthropic is worth $3 trillion today - that's roughly where it would trade as a public company - but they're mistaken that open source is bad for AI - it just kills the labs' margin and hands it to the infrastructure" this is him explaining what he actually invests in - and why his last call on this show is up 14x His words: "OpenAI launched their own chip and basically said 'f you' to Jensen - don't be surprised if Nvidia starts an OpenAI competitor - you heard it here first" "Nvidia is the American open source champion - they can release GLM 5.2 or better whenever they want" "DRAM is probably going to be 30 to 40% of all hyperscaler capex next year. hundreds of billions of dollars going straight to DRAM - it's wild" "there's a whole segment on X focused on bottlenecks - I call them the bottleneck bros. they do some work with Claude, find some esoteric Japanese company" bookmark & watch today ↓

Gavin Baker: "I think Anthropic is worth $3 trillion today - that's roughly where it would trade as a public company - but they're mistaken that open source is bad for AI - it just kills the labs' margin and hands it to the infrastructure" this is him explaining what he actually invests in - and why his last call on this show is up 14x His words: "OpenAI launched their own chip and basically said 'f you' to Jensen - don't be surprised if Nvidia starts an OpenAI competitor - you heard it here first" "Nvidia is the American open source champion - they can release GLM 5.2 or better whenever they want" "DRAM is probably going to be 30 to 40% of all hyperscaler capex next year. hundreds of billions of dollars going straight to DRAM - it's wild" "there's a whole segment on X focused on bottlenecks - I call them the bottleneck bros. they do some work with Claude, find some esoteric Japanese company" bookmark & watch today ↓

bodila

105,712 views • 1 month ago

🎥| “I'm not going to lie, I'm... I'm through the hardest part now, because fucking hell, I was a bag of nerves, honestly. We're here now, we're here now, right. Right, I've got a few things I want to say, maybe I'll sit down, feels like one of them chats, don't it? Obviously, on a day like today, you know, I... I've been reflecting, I've been thinking about my whole career. This is an important night for me, it's an important night for us as a collective, you know. I can remember distinctly, the year before I got put in the band, I actually also auditioned on The X Factor, right, and I remember distinctly... I was 17, I remember distinctly coming back and I... I got a 'no', I wasn't going to get through, and I remember being in the car with my mom, we stopped off, grabbed a Subway, that was lovely, and I'm just bawling my eyes out, being like, 'I fucking really want this, I really, really want this.' And you know, at that age, it's... it's kind of difficult to deal with that kind of shit, definitely. So, but... but luckily, you know, I had a... a good, good support and good advice around me, and I... and I went again, and then luckily, I got put in the band. And I fucking cherished every single year we had in the band, that was incredible. And you know, then there was a time where that wasn't a thing anymore, whatever we called it, fucking hiatus, or whatever. And... so I was kind of at that same place again, I was like, 'I really fucking want this, I don't want to let this go, you know, I fucking love doing what I do.' But I couldn't, I couldn't really, maybe to my own detriment, I couldn't really see the finish line like that, or even see the light at the end of the tunnel like that, I was... I was kind of worried, I was kind of worried that that might be the end for me. And I want you guys to know, you know, I say a version of this every night, this is a longer form of it, but... I simply would not have the fucking confidence to get up and play a place like Madison Square Garden. But I feel really, really, really fucking proud of what we've created, and tonight is just... is the ultimate idea. So, I... I never really feel like I can quite articulate just how much you've done for me. But honestly... tonight is one of those moments, I want everyone to leave here tonight, right, if you've seen my first tour... I want everyone to leave here tonight to... to take that, you know. You... you're responsible. I guess I played a part too, we did it together, we did it together, right. And... yeah, forever grateful for nights like tonight, it's... it's really, really special, so thank you so much. But anyway, to top things off, I did want to say, 'Side by Side' is for you. Like, I wrote that song... I actually wanted to say this before the song, but I crept up on my own emotional, not gonna lie. Um, but uh, that song's for you, listen to the words, feel it. I fucking love you, we've been doing it for a long time now, some of us, so thank you for everything, thank you for all of the passion you guys give me, I fucking love you. Right. Before I fucking choke up. Here we go!” ❤️🥹 Louis Tomlinson on stage at #HDWGHWTNewYork

🎥| “I'm not going to lie, I'm... I'm through the hardest part now, because fucking hell, I was a bag of nerves, honestly. We're here now, we're here now, right. Right, I've got a few things I want to say, maybe I'll sit down, feels like one of them chats, don't it? Obviously, on a day like today, you know, I... I've been reflecting, I've been thinking about my whole career. This is an important night for me, it's an important night for us as a collective, you know. I can remember distinctly, the year before I got put in the band, I actually also auditioned on The X Factor, right, and I remember distinctly... I was 17, I remember distinctly coming back and I... I got a 'no', I wasn't going to get through, and I remember being in the car with my mom, we stopped off, grabbed a Subway, that was lovely, and I'm just bawling my eyes out, being like, 'I fucking really want this, I really, really want this.' And you know, at that age, it's... it's kind of difficult to deal with that kind of shit, definitely. So, but... but luckily, you know, I had a... a good, good support and good advice around me, and I... and I went again, and then luckily, I got put in the band. And I fucking cherished every single year we had in the band, that was incredible. And you know, then there was a time where that wasn't a thing anymore, whatever we called it, fucking hiatus, or whatever. And... so I was kind of at that same place again, I was like, 'I really fucking want this, I don't want to let this go, you know, I fucking love doing what I do.' But I couldn't, I couldn't really, maybe to my own detriment, I couldn't really see the finish line like that, or even see the light at the end of the tunnel like that, I was... I was kind of worried, I was kind of worried that that might be the end for me. And I want you guys to know, you know, I say a version of this every night, this is a longer form of it, but... I simply would not have the fucking confidence to get up and play a place like Madison Square Garden. But I feel really, really, really fucking proud of what we've created, and tonight is just... is the ultimate idea. So, I... I never really feel like I can quite articulate just how much you've done for me. But honestly... tonight is one of those moments, I want everyone to leave here tonight, right, if you've seen my first tour... I want everyone to leave here tonight to... to take that, you know. You... you're responsible. I guess I played a part too, we did it together, we did it together, right. And... yeah, forever grateful for nights like tonight, it's... it's really, really special, so thank you so much. But anyway, to top things off, I did want to say, 'Side by Side' is for you. Like, I wrote that song... I actually wanted to say this before the song, but I crept up on my own emotional, not gonna lie. Um, but uh, that song's for you, listen to the words, feel it. I fucking love you, we've been doing it for a long time now, some of us, so thank you for everything, thank you for all of the passion you guys give me, I fucking love you. Right. Before I fucking choke up. Here we go!” ❤️🥹 Louis Tomlinson on stage at #HDWGHWTNewYork

World Tomlinson

116,227 views • 2 months ago

Sam Altman just handed every startup founder a one-question autopsy. Altman: “If you’re building something on GPT-4 that a reasonable observer would say we’re going to steamroll you.” Not might. Not could. Going to. He said it with the calm of someone describing weather. Because to him it is weather. The model improves. Whatever was built on the old version’s weaknesses gets washed away. That is not strategy. That is erosion. And most founders are building on the erosion line. They find a gap in the current model. They wrap a product around it. They raise money. They hire. They scale. Then OpenAI releases the next version and the gap closes and the product has no reason to exist anymore. Altman: “When we just do our fundamental job, which is make the model better with every crank, then you get the ‘OpenAI killed my startup’ meme.” He is telling you directly. They are not hunting you. They are not even thinking about you. They are just improving the model. You happen to be standing where the improvement lands. That is the part founders refuse to hear. OpenAI does not need to compete with you. It just needs to keep doing exactly what it was already doing and your entire company disappears as a side effect. You are not a competitor. You are a temporary symptom of incomplete intelligence. The moment the intelligence completes you become nothing. Then Brad Lightcap delivered the cleanest diagnostic ever spoken in venture capital. Lightcap: “Ask if a 100x improvement in the model is something they’re excited about.” One question. The entire investment thesis reduced to a single binary. Does the next model make your company more powerful or does it make your company pointless. There is no middle ground. Lightcap: “We know the companies that come to us saying, ‘We want the next model. When is it coming out? I want to be the first to try it.’” These companies built something that feeds on intelligence. The smarter the model gets the more their product can do. They are not threatened by progress. They are starving for it. Then there are the companies Lightcap never hears from. The ones who go quiet when a new model drops. The ones who read the release notes like a death sentence. The ones privately praying the next generation takes longer because every improvement shrinks the ground beneath them. If you are hoping the model stays roughly where it is you have already told the market everything it needs to know about your company. You are not building on intelligence. You are building on the absence of it. Altman: “95% of the world should be betting on the latter category.” The latter category is simple. Assume the model keeps getting better at the pace it has been getting better. Build for that world. Not the world where GPT-4 is the ceiling. The world where GPT-4 is the floor and the ceiling has not been built yet. Then Altman told a story that should be framed on the wall of every startup in the country. A medical AI company came to him that morning. They were not complaining about the model. They were not worried about being replaced. They were demanding it improve faster. Altman: “Here’s how many people are dying every day you delay.” That is what alignment with the trajectory looks like. A company so deeply built on intelligence improving that every day the model stays the same is a day someone dies who did not have to. They are not building on a flaw. They are building on a future that has not arrived fast enough. That is the difference. The wrapper startup patches what the model cannot do today. The real company builds what the model will unlock tomorrow. One is running from the train. The other is laying the track. Altman told you the train is not slowing down. Lightcap told you exactly how to know which side you are on. One question. Does a 100x smarter model make you more valuable or erase you. If you had to pause before answering you already did.

Sam Altman just handed every startup founder a one-question autopsy. Altman: “If you’re building something on GPT-4 that a reasonable observer would say we’re going to steamroll you.” Not might. Not could. Going to. He said it with the calm of someone describing weather. Because to him it is weather. The model improves. Whatever was built on the old version’s weaknesses gets washed away. That is not strategy. That is erosion. And most founders are building on the erosion line. They find a gap in the current model. They wrap a product around it. They raise money. They hire. They scale. Then OpenAI releases the next version and the gap closes and the product has no reason to exist anymore. Altman: “When we just do our fundamental job, which is make the model better with every crank, then you get the ‘OpenAI killed my startup’ meme.” He is telling you directly. They are not hunting you. They are not even thinking about you. They are just improving the model. You happen to be standing where the improvement lands. That is the part founders refuse to hear. OpenAI does not need to compete with you. It just needs to keep doing exactly what it was already doing and your entire company disappears as a side effect. You are not a competitor. You are a temporary symptom of incomplete intelligence. The moment the intelligence completes you become nothing. Then Brad Lightcap delivered the cleanest diagnostic ever spoken in venture capital. Lightcap: “Ask if a 100x improvement in the model is something they’re excited about.” One question. The entire investment thesis reduced to a single binary. Does the next model make your company more powerful or does it make your company pointless. There is no middle ground. Lightcap: “We know the companies that come to us saying, ‘We want the next model. When is it coming out? I want to be the first to try it.’” These companies built something that feeds on intelligence. The smarter the model gets the more their product can do. They are not threatened by progress. They are starving for it. Then there are the companies Lightcap never hears from. The ones who go quiet when a new model drops. The ones who read the release notes like a death sentence. The ones privately praying the next generation takes longer because every improvement shrinks the ground beneath them. If you are hoping the model stays roughly where it is you have already told the market everything it needs to know about your company. You are not building on intelligence. You are building on the absence of it. Altman: “95% of the world should be betting on the latter category.” The latter category is simple. Assume the model keeps getting better at the pace it has been getting better. Build for that world. Not the world where GPT-4 is the ceiling. The world where GPT-4 is the floor and the ceiling has not been built yet. Then Altman told a story that should be framed on the wall of every startup in the country. A medical AI company came to him that morning. They were not complaining about the model. They were not worried about being replaced. They were demanding it improve faster. Altman: “Here’s how many people are dying every day you delay.” That is what alignment with the trajectory looks like. A company so deeply built on intelligence improving that every day the model stays the same is a day someone dies who did not have to. They are not building on a flaw. They are building on a future that has not arrived fast enough. That is the difference. The wrapper startup patches what the model cannot do today. The real company builds what the model will unlock tomorrow. One is running from the train. The other is laying the track. Altman told you the train is not slowing down. Lightcap told you exactly how to know which side you are on. One question. Does a 100x smarter model make you more valuable or erase you. If you had to pause before answering you already did.

Dustin

39,652 views • 5 months ago

[trans] WWD THAILAND IG POST ⚫️: ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 🐰: Hi, I’m Win. Hi WWD pls come in 😊 ⚫️: What do you like most about coming to Seoul? 🐰: What I like the most... when I come to Seoul, I think of shopping. I feel like there are so many things to shop for here. 🛍️ ⚫️: After traveling continuously without a break, how do you recharge your energy? 🐰: That's a good question. I actually want everyone to share how they recharge their energy when they fly a lot too. But for me, it's sleeping 🛌 . I try to save up as much time to sleep as possible, and then... eating. Eating delicious food. 😋 ⚫️: What are you particularly into right now? 🐰: Actually, right now, I feel like I want to go learn scuba diving 🤿 . It's one of those things... at first, I was someone who was really afraid of diving because I was afraid of fish 😖🐠 I felt like I didn't want to go down and have fish constantly nipping at me. 😅But when I asked people who go diving, they said that the fish don't bother us at all when we dive. So, I felt like I wanted to try it out too, because it would be a moment where I could be with myself 🧘 ⚫️: If “Nong Win” (your younger version) saw you tonight, what would he say? 🐰: “Nong Win”... when he sees... “Phi Win”...oh it's correct 😆. Yeah, he... he’d probably be like, "Oh, today you're a Phi now. Behave yourself a little." 😄 ⚫️: How would you describe your look tonight? 🐰: For tonight's look, I tried to make it match the watch as much as possible, while still being able to go to a formal event, and go to a party as well. So it came out in the look of a brown corduroy jacket but inside, I didn't wear a shirt because that would be too formal, so I chose a tank top instead. And then white pants to match the strap of our watch. ✨ ⚫️: What do you like in particular about this watch model? 🐰: I think... this model is actually a model that you'll see has a strap that's like a... a rubber strap, right? Not a steel strap. I think it can... it's suitable for people who are active and like doing activities, going outside, going on adventures. If you get sweaty or anything like that, it's fine because it can resist water very well. And I think it looks sporty, looks suitable for an... adventurous line. You can go scuba diving with this model too. 😊 ⚫️: What do you think you will see at the party tonight? 🐰: I think I should be able to see beautiful watches, and get to meet more people in the watch industry, and meet with designers who collaborated as well. 💚 📌 AUDEMARS PIGUET X WIN #AudemarsPiguet #RoyalOakConcept #APxYV #AudemarsPiguetxWin #winmetawin #WWDThailand

[trans] WWD THAILAND IG POST ⚫️: ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 🐰: Hi, I’m Win. Hi WWD pls come in 😊 ⚫️: What do you like most about coming to Seoul? 🐰: What I like the most... when I come to Seoul, I think of shopping. I feel like there are so many things to shop for here. 🛍️ ⚫️: After traveling continuously without a break, how do you recharge your energy? 🐰: That's a good question. I actually want everyone to share how they recharge their energy when they fly a lot too. But for me, it's sleeping 🛌 . I try to save up as much time to sleep as possible, and then... eating. Eating delicious food. 😋 ⚫️: What are you particularly into right now? 🐰: Actually, right now, I feel like I want to go learn scuba diving 🤿 . It's one of those things... at first, I was someone who was really afraid of diving because I was afraid of fish 😖🐠 I felt like I didn't want to go down and have fish constantly nipping at me. 😅But when I asked people who go diving, they said that the fish don't bother us at all when we dive. So, I felt like I wanted to try it out too, because it would be a moment where I could be with myself 🧘 ⚫️: If “Nong Win” (your younger version) saw you tonight, what would he say? 🐰: “Nong Win”... when he sees... “Phi Win”...oh it's correct 😆. Yeah, he... he’d probably be like, "Oh, today you're a Phi now. Behave yourself a little." 😄 ⚫️: How would you describe your look tonight? 🐰: For tonight's look, I tried to make it match the watch as much as possible, while still being able to go to a formal event, and go to a party as well. So it came out in the look of a brown corduroy jacket but inside, I didn't wear a shirt because that would be too formal, so I chose a tank top instead. And then white pants to match the strap of our watch. ✨ ⚫️: What do you like in particular about this watch model? 🐰: I think... this model is actually a model that you'll see has a strap that's like a... a rubber strap, right? Not a steel strap. I think it can... it's suitable for people who are active and like doing activities, going outside, going on adventures. If you get sweaty or anything like that, it's fine because it can resist water very well. And I think it looks sporty, looks suitable for an... adventurous line. You can go scuba diving with this model too. 😊 ⚫️: What do you think you will see at the party tonight? 🐰: I think I should be able to see beautiful watches, and get to meet more people in the watch industry, and meet with designers who collaborated as well. 💚 📌 AUDEMARS PIGUET X WIN #AudemarsPiguet #RoyalOakConcept #APxYV #AudemarsPiguetxWin #winmetawin #WWDThailand

◡̈ ✿〜*:.｡. ꕤ M a R y ꕤ*･.｡.*･*✿.

13,608 views • 4 months ago

Sriram Krishnan reveals why it's easier to defend American code with a Chinese model than an American one right now: "I don't think it is great that the leading open weight models or open source models are not American. There's some great innovation happening with Moonshot and with DeepSeek and with Qwen, but I would much rather prefer that the leading models are American." "Linus Torvalds of Linux fame had a law that given enough eyes, all bugs are shallow. Open weight models are inherently secure because when you download a model off Hugging Face, the entire world can take it apart, inspect it, fine-tune it, look at it in ways that you absolutely cannot if they are closed." "There was an incident with Hugging Face that got reported on earlier today. Hugging Face seems to have found that somebody was using an AI LLM agent to hammer them at multiple places and to find ways to break in." "The way to counter that is to make sure American or Western or allies defenders have access to the best models to make our software just more secure." "It may be harder to look at your own code for exploits with Fable than it is when you use a Chinese model. That's just like a weird spot to be, and I think we should fix that." Sriram Krishnan

Sriram Krishnan reveals why it's easier to defend American code with a Chinese model than an American one right now: "I don't think it is great that the leading open weight models or open source models are not American. There's some great innovation happening with Moonshot and with DeepSeek and with Qwen, but I would much rather prefer that the leading models are American." "Linus Torvalds of Linux fame had a law that given enough eyes, all bugs are shallow. Open weight models are inherently secure because when you download a model off Hugging Face, the entire world can take it apart, inspect it, fine-tune it, look at it in ways that you absolutely cannot if they are closed." "There was an incident with Hugging Face that got reported on earlier today. Hugging Face seems to have found that somebody was using an AI LLM agent to hammer them at multiple places and to find ways to break in." "The way to counter that is to make sure American or Western or allies defenders have access to the best models to make our software just more secure." "It may be harder to look at your own code for exploits with Fable than it is when you use a Chinese model. That's just like a weird spot to be, and I think we should fix that." Sriram Krishnan

MTS

61,234 views • 2 months ago

#JOSHUA #조슈아 They are always giving us their best🥺 Q: what led to the formation of this unit? 😇: hearing that carats would probably like this combination, i gathered with Shua and after discussion we decided on [this unit]. 👤: would it be possible to give a little spoiler? 😇: really honestly there isn't anything that has been confirmed. Tomorrow I'm going to work on songs again and I have to go today too after this shoot. And because we constantly want to show good sides of ours, of course the other units were the same too. But settling on [this concept] and moving forward with it then thinking 'wouldnt this be better than that?' led us to work on a new song again. And then thinking 'won't this genre be better than that?' so we are working again on another song, hence there is nothing to give a spoiler for. Though I don't know how it will turn out in the end but the songs and album to be released will be created to the best of our abilities.

#JOSHUA #조슈아 They are always giving us their best🥺 Q: what led to the formation of this unit? 😇: hearing that carats would probably like this combination, i gathered with Shua and after discussion we decided on [this unit]. 👤: would it be possible to give a little spoiler? 😇: really honestly there isn't anything that has been confirmed. Tomorrow I'm going to work on songs again and I have to go today too after this shoot. And because we constantly want to show good sides of ours, of course the other units were the same too. But settling on [this concept] and moving forward with it then thinking 'wouldnt this be better than that?' led us to work on a new song again. And then thinking 'won't this genre be better than that?' so we are working again on another song, hence there is nothing to give a spoiler for. Though I don't know how it will turn out in the end but the songs and album to be released will be created to the best of our abilities.

🦌💎

86,808 views • 1 month ago

Salma Hayek took her parents & brother for the premiere of Robert Rodriguez's "Desperado" (1995), but when the sex scene played, she made them leave the theater with her as she didn't want her family to watch that scene. Here is Salma Hayek explaining how the scene was filmed: "Interviewer: Do you remember how Carolina was described in the script? Hayek: No. I mean, usually, [it’s] the age. They’re beautiful and sexy, probably. Mexican. It sounded like me. Interviewer: [Laughs] It is perfect casting. Today, there are often intimacy coordinators to help provide safe spaces for actors. How did you feel about doing a major sex scene in this movie at such a pivotal point in your career? Hayek: It was a very difficult thing for me. It was not in the original script, I have to say. I think it was one of the notes that came after they showed the screen test, which made it harder for me. I was already like, “No, that was not in there the first time.” Interviewer: But you went through with it. Hayek: They were amazing. What I can tell you is that I was very lucky because they set up the lights and the sound. [It was] Robert, Antonio, Elizabeth and I. Robert was operating the camera. I think there was no sound. Elizabeth was moving cable. [There] was not even a [monitor]. And I flipped out. I wouldn’t do it. They were very patient. It was two hours, and I was still not [working] up the courage. Then it was very, very nice. They closed the set. They did everything that could possibly be done. But it was one long scene with dialogue and… it was different. There were little moments before I would flip out again. I walked out of the premiere when they played it and I took my brother, father, and mother with me. I didn't want any of them to see it. They were happy to walk out right away and then we came back again. I don't think they noticed anything." (Salma Hayek's interview with Candice Frederick, Elle, 2020)

Sensitive content

Salma Hayek took her parents & brother for the premiere of Robert Rodriguez's "Desperado" (1995), but when the sex scene played, she made them leave the theater with her as she didn't want her family to watch that scene. Here is Salma Hayek explaining how the scene was filmed: "Interviewer: Do you remember how Carolina was described in the script? Hayek: No. I mean, usually, [it’s] the age. They’re beautiful and sexy, probably. Mexican. It sounded like me. Interviewer: [Laughs] It is perfect casting. Today, there are often intimacy coordinators to help provide safe spaces for actors. How did you feel about doing a major sex scene in this movie at such a pivotal point in your career? Hayek: It was a very difficult thing for me. It was not in the original script, I have to say. I think it was one of the notes that came after they showed the screen test, which made it harder for me. I was already like, “No, that was not in there the first time.” Interviewer: But you went through with it. Hayek: They were amazing. What I can tell you is that I was very lucky because they set up the lights and the sound. [It was] Robert, Antonio, Elizabeth and I. Robert was operating the camera. I think there was no sound. Elizabeth was moving cable. [There] was not even a [monitor]. And I flipped out. I wouldn’t do it. They were very patient. It was two hours, and I was still not [working] up the courage. Then it was very, very nice. They closed the set. They did everything that could possibly be done. But it was one long scene with dialogue and… it was different. There were little moments before I would flip out again. I walked out of the premiere when they played it and I took my brother, father, and mother with me. I didn't want any of them to see it. They were happy to walk out right away and then we came back again. I don't think they noticed anything." (Salma Hayek's interview with Candice Frederick, Elle, 2020)

DepressedBergman

31,706 views • 6 months ago

Glasses are a complete scam. They don't actually address the root cause of your bad eyesight and instead act as crutches to temporarily help you see but the second you take them off you are blind again. Most people don't realize that if you simply address the root cause of your bad eyesight, you will no longer need glasses. I wore glasses for over 15 years, and I couldn't even read a stop sign without my glasses on, and now I can see perfectly. I addressed the root cause by changing my diet, eating perfectly and taking advantage of the natural light in my environment, watching the sunrise, watching the sunset, and being outdoors, even when it's cloudy outside like it is today. If you don't want to be blind, and if you want to improve your vision, you simply need to get healthy.

Glasses are a complete scam. They don't actually address the root cause of your bad eyesight and instead act as crutches to temporarily help you see but the second you take them off you are blind again. Most people don't realize that if you simply address the root cause of your bad eyesight, you will no longer need glasses. I wore glasses for over 15 years, and I couldn't even read a stop sign without my glasses on, and now I can see perfectly. I addressed the root cause by changing my diet, eating perfectly and taking advantage of the natural light in my environment, watching the sunrise, watching the sunset, and being outdoors, even when it's cloudy outside like it is today. If you don't want to be blind, and if you want to improve your vision, you simply need to get healthy.

Riley Check

12,993 views • 27 days ago

I thought long and hard about how to show max teddism and then I figured it out … We’ve been chanting spread the word But outside of web3 have we really spread the word? 🤷‍♀️ Myself ,my sisters Aderinola1234 Chinonso 💯🔥🔥 and my younger brother have made it our mission to preach teddism to everyone on and off web3 . Past few months have been a lot but I would do it again if I could . Yesterday, My siblings and I made stickers and flyers (with a QR code which led people to the steady teddys application site ) , we cooked food and shared to children , neighbors and people on the street, and while doing that we spoke to them about steady teddy in a bid to convert more followers. I thought to myself, children are the leaders of tomorrow right ⁉️ but … they also forget things so easy 😂so how do I not only get their attention, but also imprint steady teddy into their memory forever ? I got to work 💪we printed steady teddys pictures and asked them to colour . We gave monetary price to the best drawing (it was a hard choice as they were all so cute 😭😂❤️) . For hours after that ,they couldn’t stopped talking about steady teddy . I have never been more proud knowing I helped build a core memory for them . In this video I also did my best to try to highlight the fact that things might not always happen how we want it to or how soon we want it , but all we have to do is to keep showing up and giving it our best ❤️ Have you preached teddism today ? Don’t forget to show love to someone. ❤️ I hope this is max tedism enough steady teddys . Steady teddy to the streets .

I thought long and hard about how to show max teddism and then I figured it out … We’ve been chanting spread the word But outside of web3 have we really spread the word? 🤷‍♀️ Myself ,my sisters Aderinola1234 Chinonso 💯🔥🔥 and my younger brother have made it our mission to preach teddism to everyone on and off web3 . Past few months have been a lot but I would do it again if I could . Yesterday, My siblings and I made stickers and flyers (with a QR code which led people to the steady teddys application site ) , we cooked food and shared to children , neighbors and people on the street, and while doing that we spoke to them about steady teddy in a bid to convert more followers. I thought to myself, children are the leaders of tomorrow right ⁉️ but … they also forget things so easy 😂so how do I not only get their attention, but also imprint steady teddy into their memory forever ? I got to work 💪we printed steady teddys pictures and asked them to colour . We gave monetary price to the best drawing (it was a hard choice as they were all so cute 😭😂❤️) . For hours after that ,they couldn’t stopped talking about steady teddy . I have never been more proud knowing I helped build a core memory for them . In this video I also did my best to try to highlight the fact that things might not always happen how we want it to or how soon we want it , but all we have to do is to keep showing up and giving it our best ❤️ Have you preached teddism today ? Don’t forget to show love to someone. ❤️ I hope this is max tedism enough steady teddys . Steady teddy to the streets .

WADA🍀

14,880 views • 1 year ago

David Friedberg reveals frontier labs are taking novel insights from his chat history and packaging them as their own "I have had experiences where we've asked some fairly novel scientific questions, and it identifies it as a novel insight, 'oh, never thought about that, might be interesting,' blah blah blah..." "And the using a different account, asking the next model version, it's like, 'oh, you could do this'. And it actually just describes this exact thing that we had in our chat in the previous version." "These are a handful of anecdotal experiences. But I know the domain that we work in, and the novelty of this stuff. So I know that there isn't some new corpus of information out there that's training the new model." "So all I can say at that point is that my conversation or our analyses have been used for training. The truth is, it's actually a piece of IP, that's our organizational IP. We don't have any NDA or confidentiality protections, with them being a service provider back to us." "This is why I care a lot about open source, because I don't want them having my chat logs, because they can use them for training to create an IP that is now diffused to the rest of the market. I find this very unfair."

David Friedberg reveals frontier labs are taking novel insights from his chat history and packaging them as their own "I have had experiences where we've asked some fairly novel scientific questions, and it identifies it as a novel insight, 'oh, never thought about that, might be interesting,' blah blah blah..." "And the using a different account, asking the next model version, it's like, 'oh, you could do this'. And it actually just describes this exact thing that we had in our chat in the previous version." "These are a handful of anecdotal experiences. But I know the domain that we work in, and the novelty of this stuff. So I know that there isn't some new corpus of information out there that's training the new model." "So all I can say at that point is that my conversation or our analyses have been used for training. The truth is, it's actually a piece of IP, that's our organizational IP. We don't have any NDA or confidentiality protections, with them being a service provider back to us." "This is why I care a lot about open source, because I don't want them having my chat logs, because they can use them for training to create an IP that is now diffused to the rest of the market. I find this very unfair."

dnap

379,042 views • 10 days ago

Susan Sarandon explains why her children didn't show much interest in seeing her movies: "Interviewer: Susan, you said your son was one when 'Thelma & Louise' (1991) was made. I would suspect all of your kids have watched this movie by now. What was their reaction when they saw it, knowing their moms made this iconic film? Sarandon: I don't even know if they've watched it, actually. They didn't watch it with me, so I have no idea. Interviewer: Really?! Sarandon: I mean, I think they're probably relieved that I didn't take my clothes off, because that's always the first thing. "Is there s€x in it? Is there going to be s€x in it?" Which, even just kissing is just as offensive as full-blown frontal n*d!ty [to them], so it doesn't even matter if you're tasteful. So, I don't even know if they saw it. I'll have to drag them [to the drive-in]. I'll force them for the anniversary. They'll probably say, "Oh, mom, of course I saw it," but they didn't say anything to me. Davis: I don't know if my kids have seen it either, quite honestly. Sarandon: Nobody wants to see their mother looking like someone else. When I was doing films when I just had my daughter and I would come back, the first thing she had to do was take my makeup off. She just did not want me to be with my hair, with my makeup [done]. She wants her mom back. She doesn't want someone that looks different." ("Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis Are Reuniting for 'Thelma & Louise' 30th Anniversary", John Boone, ET, 2021) P.S: On this day, 35 years ago, Ridley Scott's "Thelma & Louise" (1991) premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, France.

Susan Sarandon explains why her children didn't show much interest in seeing her movies: "Interviewer: Susan, you said your son was one when 'Thelma & Louise' (1991) was made. I would suspect all of your kids have watched this movie by now. What was their reaction when they saw it, knowing their moms made this iconic film? Sarandon: I don't even know if they've watched it, actually. They didn't watch it with me, so I have no idea. Interviewer: Really?! Sarandon: I mean, I think they're probably relieved that I didn't take my clothes off, because that's always the first thing. "Is there s€x in it? Is there going to be s€x in it?" Which, even just kissing is just as offensive as full-blown frontal n*d!ty [to them], so it doesn't even matter if you're tasteful. So, I don't even know if they saw it. I'll have to drag them [to the drive-in]. I'll force them for the anniversary. They'll probably say, "Oh, mom, of course I saw it," but they didn't say anything to me. Davis: I don't know if my kids have seen it either, quite honestly. Sarandon: Nobody wants to see their mother looking like someone else. When I was doing films when I just had my daughter and I would come back, the first thing she had to do was take my makeup off. She just did not want me to be with my hair, with my makeup [done]. She wants her mom back. She doesn't want someone that looks different." ("Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis Are Reuniting for 'Thelma & Louise' 30th Anniversary", John Boone, ET, 2021) P.S: On this day, 35 years ago, Ridley Scott's "Thelma & Louise" (1991) premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, France.

DepressedBergman

35,046 views • 4 months ago