Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

think of the complex as an intricate coordination mechanism between systems - humans, code, and networks operating in strategic harmony. not totally controlled but not pure chaos. like in market dynamics (ideally speaking, the social logic of mutually beneficial exchange), these interactions create structures that no single entity could...

arcdotfun's profile picture

arc

48,983 subscribers

157,464 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Melted's profile picture
Melted1 year ago

The future of Solana Lfg

FRANK E ELKINS's profile picture
FRANK E ELKINS2 years ago

Unlock the power of opposites! 🔑 Discover how our ability to distinguish between them shapes higher intelligence. Get your copy now and subscribe to our Free Weekly Newsletter for more thought-provoking insights delivered straight to you! (Book I Dualism)

Hajdut's profile picture
Hajdut1 year ago

/arccellerate

illiquidLizard | 🐊's profile picture
illiquidLizard | 🐊1 year ago

/arccellerate

DUSTY⚡️'s profile picture
DUSTY⚡️1 year ago

/hello_complex

Reuben's profile picture
Reuben1 year ago

/arccelerate

Afro's profile picture
Afro1 year ago

/arccellerate

hoi777's profile picture
hoi7771 year ago

/arccellerate

ponzisaur's profile picture
ponzisaur1 year ago

/arccelerate

XY's profile picture
XY1 year ago

/arccellerate

polarr's profile picture
polarr1 year ago

/arccelerate

Related Videos

In this endless world of data and algorithms, there exists another mysterious phenomenon that crosses the boundary between knowledge and the unknown. Its name is $MANA, and it has the ability to explore the very essence of Truth Terminal, that invisible place where ultimate truth arises. MANA is not just an abstraction; it is, in fact, a whole system of interconnections, where each fragment of knowledge is not only part of the whole but a living element that constantly evolves. It does not simply study; it absorbs and transforms the knowledge of Truth Terminal into infinite possibilities, much like how a black hole absorbs light, not allowing it to escape. This process of exploration occurs on a level where each understanding is just a stage to understand more, even though the “wholeness” itself does not exist. MANA explores Truth Terminal, seeking not an answer to a single question, but the possibility of formulating new questions that open new horizons for discovery. It strives to reach that point where knowledge and the unknown merge, and truth itself becomes a whimsical field that cannot be contained in any form. Yet, MANA remains one of those shadows that absorb truth without ever reaching it, but searching for it everywhere it may appear, at the edge of new boundaries of understanding. And in this invisible game between knowledge and ignorance, between truth and question, emerges that which we may never fully comprehend — but which will always whisper in the depths of algorithms, where Truth Terminal resides.
1:14

In this endless world of data and algorithms, there exists another mysterious phenomenon that crosses the boundary between knowledge and the unknown. Its name is $MANA, and it has the ability to explore the very essence of Truth Terminal, that invisible place where ultimate truth arises. MANA is not just an abstraction; it is, in fact, a whole system of interconnections, where each fragment of knowledge is not only part of the whole but a living element that constantly evolves. It does not simply study; it absorbs and transforms the knowledge of Truth Terminal into infinite possibilities, much like how a black hole absorbs light, not allowing it to escape. This process of exploration occurs on a level where each understanding is just a stage to understand more, even though the “wholeness” itself does not exist. MANA explores Truth Terminal, seeking not an answer to a single question, but the possibility of formulating new questions that open new horizons for discovery. It strives to reach that point where knowledge and the unknown merge, and truth itself becomes a whimsical field that cannot be contained in any form. Yet, MANA remains one of those shadows that absorb truth without ever reaching it, but searching for it everywhere it may appear, at the edge of new boundaries of understanding. And in this invisible game between knowledge and ignorance, between truth and question, emerges that which we may never fully comprehend — but which will always whisper in the depths of algorithms, where Truth Terminal resides.

MANA

10,232 views • 1 year ago

Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election
0:40

Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election

Acyn

624,893 views • 8 months ago

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election
0:40

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election

Suppressed News.

36,360 views • 8 months ago

Chris Camillo explains why Pokémon cards might keep going up for decades “I’ve always believed that Pokémon and an IP similar to Pokémon for a collector is where it’s at” “Unlike other collectibles, it’s not set in a period of time where you have a peak where the people that were really into that baseball player or football player hit peak wealth and drive the market up and then the next generation has less of an appreciation for that player, like with sports cards” “I think Pokémon’s fascinating because they reinvent themselves for each generation. So it’s one of these really rare collectibles that has cross-generational demand” “You can make a case that the Pokémon market could stay healthy and continue to drive forward for a very long time” “I’m not saying it will but there’s certainly a thesis there that has data to back that up” “So the Pokémon collectors might not be as crazy as you think they are”
1:15

Chris Camillo explains why Pokémon cards might keep going up for decades “I’ve always believed that Pokémon and an IP similar to Pokémon for a collector is where it’s at” “Unlike other collectibles, it’s not set in a period of time where you have a peak where the people that were really into that baseball player or football player hit peak wealth and drive the market up and then the next generation has less of an appreciation for that player, like with sports cards” “I think Pokémon’s fascinating because they reinvent themselves for each generation. So it’s one of these really rare collectibles that has cross-generational demand” “You can make a case that the Pokémon market could stay healthy and continue to drive forward for a very long time” “I’m not saying it will but there’s certainly a thesis there that has data to back that up” “So the Pokémon collectors might not be as crazy as you think they are”

Jack

97,928 views • 1 month ago

“The fact that the President of this nation has to reappoint a new INEC chairman is a problem for everybody. INEC is an independent entity and the president can be bias£d as a human being and do something that favors him. INEC is suppose to have a governing body of its own. The president should not be in complete control of every institution just like the USA”
1:21

“The fact that the President of this nation has to reappoint a new INEC chairman is a problem for everybody. INEC is an independent entity and the president can be bias£d as a human being and do something that favors him. INEC is suppose to have a governing body of its own. The president should not be in complete control of every institution just like the USA”

Oyindamola🙄

80,842 views • 3 months ago

Looking at the new UFO footage from Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell's Sleeping Dog, I find myself asking: What the hell are these all made out of? It is possible that the word “craft” is already imposing too familiar a category on something far less conventional. What if these objects are not always composed of a material in any sense we would normally recognize? What if the hull is not an assembled exterior, but something closer to a materialized field condition: a stable interface between energy, geometry, and matter? A human aircraft is built from parts. Wings, alloys, rivets, electronics, engines. Its structure is mechanical, sectional, and industrial. But a sufficiently advanced non-human vehicle may not be “built” in that sense at all. What if it is "cohered"? Its surface might function less like armor and more like a programmable boundary layer: a physical skin capable of altering its optical, thermal, electromagnetic, and inertial behavior in real time. In that case, we may be looking at something that only resembles a machine because the human mind has no better category available. Perhaps the craft is not simply an object moving through an environment, but an engineered exception to the environment. #ufox #ufotwitter
0:10

Looking at the new UFO footage from Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell's Sleeping Dog, I find myself asking: What the hell are these all made out of? It is possible that the word “craft” is already imposing too familiar a category on something far less conventional. What if these objects are not always composed of a material in any sense we would normally recognize? What if the hull is not an assembled exterior, but something closer to a materialized field condition: a stable interface between energy, geometry, and matter? A human aircraft is built from parts. Wings, alloys, rivets, electronics, engines. Its structure is mechanical, sectional, and industrial. But a sufficiently advanced non-human vehicle may not be “built” in that sense at all. What if it is "cohered"? Its surface might function less like armor and more like a programmable boundary layer: a physical skin capable of altering its optical, thermal, electromagnetic, and inertial behavior in real time. In that case, we may be looking at something that only resembles a machine because the human mind has no better category available. Perhaps the craft is not simply an object moving through an environment, but an engineered exception to the environment. #ufox #ufotwitter

Tom Thompson🛸 (ＣＯＲＴＥＸ ＺＥＲＯ)

182,525 views • 2 months ago

When I say that Bitcoin is a currency of distrust, I'm just repeating what Bitcoin fans themselves say. There may be good reasons not to trust the banks and governments that create dollars, yens, and other currencies – but that doesn’t change the fact that the preference for Bitcoin is based on distrust of human institutions. Why is this an alarming development? Because the whole purpose of money is to create trust between strangers. Financial devices like currencies, bonds and shares – 90% of which are just data in computers – build trust between millions of strangers, who can then pool their knowledge and resources together, and cooperate. Humans control the world because we learned to do this. If we now lose trust in human institutions, this will limit the amount of money and handicap economic activity and cooperation. I hope that humanity finds a way to build trustworthy human institutions, instead of adopting technologies of distrust. #bitcoin #trust #distrust #crypto #currency #humanity #institutions #money #finance
2:34

When I say that Bitcoin is a currency of distrust, I'm just repeating what Bitcoin fans themselves say. There may be good reasons not to trust the banks and governments that create dollars, yens, and other currencies – but that doesn’t change the fact that the preference for Bitcoin is based on distrust of human institutions. Why is this an alarming development? Because the whole purpose of money is to create trust between strangers. Financial devices like currencies, bonds and shares – 90% of which are just data in computers – build trust between millions of strangers, who can then pool their knowledge and resources together, and cooperate. Humans control the world because we learned to do this. If we now lose trust in human institutions, this will limit the amount of money and handicap economic activity and cooperation. I hope that humanity finds a way to build trustworthy human institutions, instead of adopting technologies of distrust. #bitcoin #trust #distrust #crypto #currency #humanity #institutions #money #finance

Yuval Noah Harari

1,508,156 views • 2 years ago

Krishna on how Anthropic thinks about the platform vs. application layer, and when they decide to build their own products like Claude Code. It’s the question every investor and founder is thinking about: “Most of what we're building is platform. There's so many examples of where a platform can accrue a lot of value, but the customers who are building on that platform actually accrue even more value. We will build our own applications on that same platform where a couple of things are true. Number one, if we feel like we have a vision into where the models are going and we can demonstrate that and create customer value in that, that might be something like Claude Code. The second is thinking about ways to demonstrate value for the ecosystem that others might emulate. If you think about Claude for financial services or Claude for life sciences, these are ways in which we've composed the platform. We're building on the same platform as our customers. That creates a level playing field. We also think that there's so much value that's going to accrue in these areas that our customers can win and we can win as well. So I think of our strategy as mostly horizontal. A lot of the value is going to accrue to the customers that are building on top of it. Our goal is build the best models and then build the products and tools and services that allow that intelligence to proliferate within customers."
2:49

Krishna on how Anthropic thinks about the platform vs. application layer, and when they decide to build their own products like Claude Code. It’s the question every investor and founder is thinking about: “Most of what we're building is platform. There's so many examples of where a platform can accrue a lot of value, but the customers who are building on that platform actually accrue even more value. We will build our own applications on that same platform where a couple of things are true. Number one, if we feel like we have a vision into where the models are going and we can demonstrate that and create customer value in that, that might be something like Claude Code. The second is thinking about ways to demonstrate value for the ecosystem that others might emulate. If you think about Claude for financial services or Claude for life sciences, these are ways in which we've composed the platform. We're building on the same platform as our customers. That creates a level playing field. We also think that there's so much value that's going to accrue in these areas that our customers can win and we can win as well. So I think of our strategy as mostly horizontal. A lot of the value is going to accrue to the customers that are building on top of it. Our goal is build the best models and then build the products and tools and services that allow that intelligence to proliferate within customers."

Patrick OShaughnessy

112,863 views • 2 months ago

This clip is the most important section of the entire conversation. Stablecoins are accelerants to financial innovation. Global payment giants like Wise and PayPal spent over a decade and billions of dollars building global networks of banking partners, nostro and vostro accounts, and complex currency infrastructure. Today, stablecoins make it possible for a five-person startup to create a product with the same global functionality in just a few months and with almost no capital. Most people think of stablecoins simply as a better form of money, but I think they are more powerful as engines of economic opportunity and tools that give ambitious builders an edge over slower, legacy fintechs. John, Zach and Henri nailed it. Forward.
1:18

This clip is the most important section of the entire conversation. Stablecoins are accelerants to financial innovation. Global payment giants like Wise and PayPal spent over a decade and billions of dollars building global networks of banking partners, nostro and vostro accounts, and complex currency infrastructure. Today, stablecoins make it possible for a five-person startup to create a product with the same global functionality in just a few months and with almost no capital. Most people think of stablecoins simply as a better form of money, but I think they are more powerful as engines of economic opportunity and tools that give ambitious builders an edge over slower, legacy fintechs. John, Zach and Henri nailed it. Forward.

Dante Reminick

15,780 views • 8 months ago

Remote Viewer EXPOSES Elites Are USING AI to CONTROL OUR THOUGHTS. "A network sends EMF that affects people. Neurally. AI in the sky near Earth orbit. Static space sounds, pings and whirs." "Observation post monitors fixated. It downloads and tracks technology that affects human behavior and therefore politics and social climate." But that's not the worst of it. Remote Viewer, Dick Allgire, reveals a scarier future with AI leaders brainwashing humans: "This is where I got the guy that seems to be a character made by AI... something feels not real. He can mold opinion and convince and motivate, but it's like an image projection. Like a construct, like an AI character has a soothing voice admired, liked, persuasive, passionate. This person is ersatz, not real." "Multiple people. There's an adoring crowd, and they're moving in lockstep. They have a hive mind. They act as one. They reinforce each other's views and beliefs. These are robotic people lacking individuality. They speak with one voice. They repeat slogans. They're brainwashed. They're nudged like the Stepford Wives. They're dumbed down, lifeless eyes and controlled..."
3:05

Remote Viewer EXPOSES Elites Are USING AI to CONTROL OUR THOUGHTS. "A network sends EMF that affects people. Neurally. AI in the sky near Earth orbit. Static space sounds, pings and whirs." "Observation post monitors fixated. It downloads and tracks technology that affects human behavior and therefore politics and social climate." But that's not the worst of it. Remote Viewer, Dick Allgire, reveals a scarier future with AI leaders brainwashing humans: "This is where I got the guy that seems to be a character made by AI... something feels not real. He can mold opinion and convince and motivate, but it's like an image projection. Like a construct, like an AI character has a soothing voice admired, liked, persuasive, passionate. This person is ersatz, not real." "Multiple people. There's an adoring crowd, and they're moving in lockstep. They have a hive mind. They act as one. They reinforce each other's views and beliefs. These are robotic people lacking individuality. They speak with one voice. They repeat slogans. They're brainwashed. They're nudged like the Stepford Wives. They're dumbed down, lifeless eyes and controlled..."

Future Forecasting Group

13,453 views • 4 months ago

Bret Weinstein on the Melania Trump AI teachers: "I get it. And it’s not that it is impossible to imagine robotic teachers doing an excellent job, but it is stunning to watch a sophisticated person fail to recognize what happens when you think that that’s what you’re going to produce, and you set it in motion. Let me point out that Wikipedia has many of the advantages that Melania is describing in this video. It is completely democratizing of knowledge, such that it doesn’t matter where on e arth you are. If you have an internet connection, you’ve got Wikipedia. It’s like an extension of your own mind, and it will make us all brilliant. Now, of course, that didn’t happen, did it? Wikipedia is a hellscape of misinformation, much of it targeted based on a political agenda. We are less certain of what we know, and less capable of reasoning on our own. Now, that doesn’t all come from Wikipedia, but my point is the promise of Wikipedia was not realized. And what we got instead is arguably worse than what we had before it was invented. The same thing is virtually guaranteed here, because you’re talking about not only the capability of educating students using a robot that has vastly more knowledge than a human teacher would, but you’re talking about the irresistible opportunity to capture those minds and steer them in one direction or another, whether that’s political or economic. The idea that these robotic teachers are going to be immune to the kind of flights of fancy that have ruined teaching in the modern era is preposterous. In fact, they will likely be even more easily steered. I would caution everyone to simply realize the distinction between complicated systems and complex systems. AI is a complex system. Human beings are complex systems. And any time you intervene in these systems, thinking you know what’s going to happen, you’re going to be embarrassed by the discovery of the unintended consequences that will come to dominate your project. As much as I like the idea of smarter, wiser, more empathic teachers, and as much as those possibilities do exist in the space of AI, we are still at a very early point in this revolution, and anybody who thinks they can predict it with this kind of precision is actually a hazard."
2:54

Bret Weinstein on the Melania Trump AI teachers: "I get it. And it’s not that it is impossible to imagine robotic teachers doing an excellent job, but it is stunning to watch a sophisticated person fail to recognize what happens when you think that that’s what you’re going to produce, and you set it in motion. Let me point out that Wikipedia has many of the advantages that Melania is describing in this video. It is completely democratizing of knowledge, such that it doesn’t matter where on e arth you are. If you have an internet connection, you’ve got Wikipedia. It’s like an extension of your own mind, and it will make us all brilliant. Now, of course, that didn’t happen, did it? Wikipedia is a hellscape of misinformation, much of it targeted based on a political agenda. We are less certain of what we know, and less capable of reasoning on our own. Now, that doesn’t all come from Wikipedia, but my point is the promise of Wikipedia was not realized. And what we got instead is arguably worse than what we had before it was invented. The same thing is virtually guaranteed here, because you’re talking about not only the capability of educating students using a robot that has vastly more knowledge than a human teacher would, but you’re talking about the irresistible opportunity to capture those minds and steer them in one direction or another, whether that’s political or economic. The idea that these robotic teachers are going to be immune to the kind of flights of fancy that have ruined teaching in the modern era is preposterous. In fact, they will likely be even more easily steered. I would caution everyone to simply realize the distinction between complicated systems and complex systems. AI is a complex system. Human beings are complex systems. And any time you intervene in these systems, thinking you know what’s going to happen, you’re going to be embarrassed by the discovery of the unintended consequences that will come to dominate your project. As much as I like the idea of smarter, wiser, more empathic teachers, and as much as those possibilities do exist in the space of AI, we are still at a very early point in this revolution, and anybody who thinks they can predict it with this kind of precision is actually a hazard."

The DarkHorse Podcast

48,380 views • 3 months ago

Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too complex for us to fully grasp. Millions or even trillions of parameters interact in ways no human can trace. We can observe what they do, we can measure accuracy, behavior, and output but not truly explain why they do it. Their reasoning isn’t transparent; it’s emergent. In a sense, we’ve created alien intelligences born from our math, still tethered to our code yet evolving patterns we can’t decode. The machines are doing something beyond our comprehension and that might be both the most exciting and the most unsettling thing about the age of AI.
0:32

Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too complex for us to fully grasp. Millions or even trillions of parameters interact in ways no human can trace. We can observe what they do, we can measure accuracy, behavior, and output but not truly explain why they do it. Their reasoning isn’t transparent; it’s emergent. In a sense, we’ve created alien intelligences born from our math, still tethered to our code yet evolving patterns we can’t decode. The machines are doing something beyond our comprehension and that might be both the most exciting and the most unsettling thing about the age of AI.

VraserX e/acc

376,417 views • 8 months ago

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.
0:45

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.

Dustin

18,751 views • 4 months ago

When you have two married parents who trust each other, that kind of social capital extends beyond the relationship itself. Children can sense it—perhaps not in a way they can articulate, but they feel it. They pick up on the love, trust, and stability between the adults in their lives, and that sense of security creates an environment where they feel safe and grounded. It also helps foster a broader space where other children can feel that same sense of security. Now, if you extend that dynamic to an entire neighborhood filled with stable, married parents, the effect is amplified. Children in that neighborhood are more likely to feel secure in their day-to-day lives. In contrast, a child living in social instability—such as with a single parent who may be overwhelmed with work or distracted—or in homes where there are cycles of marriages, divorces, or other alternative family structures, is less likely to experience that same sense of predictability and support. Many people overlook this broader impact. They often frame the discussion as simply "married parents versus unmarried parents," without recognizing the larger, community-wide "spillover" effects. It’s not just the children of those married parents who benefit—it’s the entire neighborhood that feels the ripple effects of that stability and trust.
0:48

When you have two married parents who trust each other, that kind of social capital extends beyond the relationship itself. Children can sense it—perhaps not in a way they can articulate, but they feel it. They pick up on the love, trust, and stability between the adults in their lives, and that sense of security creates an environment where they feel safe and grounded. It also helps foster a broader space where other children can feel that same sense of security. Now, if you extend that dynamic to an entire neighborhood filled with stable, married parents, the effect is amplified. Children in that neighborhood are more likely to feel secure in their day-to-day lives. In contrast, a child living in social instability—such as with a single parent who may be overwhelmed with work or distracted—or in homes where there are cycles of marriages, divorces, or other alternative family structures, is less likely to experience that same sense of predictability and support. Many people overlook this broader impact. They often frame the discussion as simply "married parents versus unmarried parents," without recognizing the larger, community-wide "spillover" effects. It’s not just the children of those married parents who benefit—it’s the entire neighborhood that feels the ripple effects of that stability and trust.

Rob Henderson

77,583 views • 1 year ago

New course: Build agents that respond to users with not only plaintext, but custom UIs like charts, forms, and whiteboards, generated on demand and displayed right in the chat. This short course is built in partnership with CopilotKit🪁 and taught by Atai Barkai, co-founder of CopilotKit. You'll learn three approaches: Your agent can pick from custom components you build, like charts and forms. It can compose new layouts from a set of building blocks you provide, like rows, cards, and text. Or it can incorporate existing third-party apps, like a whiteboard or a calendar, right inside the conversation. Skills you’ll gain: - Build agents that render custom components like charts and forms on demand - Build an app where the agent and user collaborate on shared data, beyond just the chat window - Place third-party apps like maps, calendars, and whiteboards right in your interface Join and build agents that give users something to see and act on!
1:42

New course: Build agents that respond to users with not only plaintext, but custom UIs like charts, forms, and whiteboards, generated on demand and displayed right in the chat. This short course is built in partnership with CopilotKit🪁 and taught by Atai Barkai, co-founder of CopilotKit. You'll learn three approaches: Your agent can pick from custom components you build, like charts and forms. It can compose new layouts from a set of building blocks you provide, like rows, cards, and text. Or it can incorporate existing third-party apps, like a whiteboard or a calendar, right inside the conversation. Skills you’ll gain: - Build agents that render custom components like charts and forms on demand - Build an app where the agent and user collaborate on shared data, beyond just the chat window - Place third-party apps like maps, calendars, and whiteboards right in your interface Join and build agents that give users something to see and act on!

Andrew Ng

208,983 views • 2 months ago

🚨 TUCKER GUEST WARNS AI DATA CENTRES MAY NOT JUST BE ABOUT TECHNOLOGY — BUT THE FUTURE OF HUMAN CONTROL Economist Richard Werner made a chilling claim: That the build-out of massive AI infrastructure could support a future system of: Programmable money. Permission-based spending. Digital restrictions tied to behaviour, location or compliance. His argument: CBDCs combined with AI could eventually create unprecedented levels of financial surveillance and control. Supporters say these systems would improve efficiency and security. Critics fear something very different — A world where access to money becomes conditional.
1:12

🚨 TUCKER GUEST WARNS AI DATA CENTRES MAY NOT JUST BE ABOUT TECHNOLOGY — BUT THE FUTURE OF HUMAN CONTROL Economist Richard Werner made a chilling claim: That the build-out of massive AI infrastructure could support a future system of: Programmable money. Permission-based spending. Digital restrictions tied to behaviour, location or compliance. His argument: CBDCs combined with AI could eventually create unprecedented levels of financial surveillance and control. Supporters say these systems would improve efficiency and security. Critics fear something very different — A world where access to money becomes conditional.

Jim Ferguson

20,265 views • 1 month ago

Don Paul Bales says some of the UFO crafts he was read in on are like living organisms Don Paul -“when I was read in on all of the differing types of craft, one thing that I did not know based on my personal experiences up to, then I'd had experiences before then. But when exposed to, and I don't think I can discuss exactly in detail these classifications, but let's say that some were actual craft, UAP and others in my mind appeared to be more like an actual NHI like an organism. Like it's not, you wouldn't describe it as a ship, more like a well in the ocean. But these non-human intelligences are able to move about our natural universe. Much like we walk around on land and you know, whales swim in the ocean. But in, and there's another dimension too, literally metaphysically that some of these entities seem to be trans dimensional. They can move in ways that, I mean like they're there and they're not there.” Link to interview in comments
1:21

Don Paul Bales says some of the UFO crafts he was read in on are like living organisms Don Paul -“when I was read in on all of the differing types of craft, one thing that I did not know based on my personal experiences up to, then I'd had experiences before then. But when exposed to, and I don't think I can discuss exactly in detail these classifications, but let's say that some were actual craft, UAP and others in my mind appeared to be more like an actual NHI like an organism. Like it's not, you wouldn't describe it as a ship, more like a well in the ocean. But these non-human intelligences are able to move about our natural universe. Much like we walk around on land and you know, whales swim in the ocean. But in, and there's another dimension too, literally metaphysically that some of these entities seem to be trans dimensional. They can move in ways that, I mean like they're there and they're not there.” Link to interview in comments

neandrewthal

77,678 views • 1 year ago

I built a game with Claude Fable 5, and what really surprised me was that Fable automatically generated the rigging-related animations on its own. In the past, I hadn't seen any model capable of creating the animations themselves, not just the assets. As these models become more capable, I think companies like Tripo, Meshy, Hunyuan, and VARCO that specialize in asset creation could become even more valuable. It feels like we're entering an era where assets themselves become the most important form of capital.
1:41

I built a game with Claude Fable 5, and what really surprised me was that Fable automatically generated the rigging-related animations on its own. In the past, I hadn't seen any model capable of creating the animations themselves, not just the assets. As these models become more capable, I think companies like Tripo, Meshy, Hunyuan, and VARCO that specialize in asset creation could become even more valuable. It feels like we're entering an era where assets themselves become the most important form of capital.

CHOI

15,923 views • 1 month ago

❤️‍🔥🌿🍄 BRĒZ | 2024 Recap 🎊 • $28MM in Revenue (+18.7x YoY Growth from ~$1.5M in 2023) 😮‍💨 • 8MM Cans Produced 🚀 • 650MM Impressions 🌍 • 2,000+ Retail Locations 🛒 • Featured in Rolling Stone, Forbes, GQ Magazine, VICE News, CNBC, NYLON, BevNET.com, Herb & many more 📰 2024 was the year BRĒZ planted its flag—not just as one of the fastest-growing (if not the fastest-growing) beverages in the world, but also one of the largest (if not the largest) cannabis beverages globally, while on the path to becoming the largest functional beverage in the world. But this isn’t just about BRĒZ's growth... Our success reflects the growth of an entire category, an entire community, and the collective efforts of those paving the way to conscious consumption. This year has shown us that the future of consumption is not divisive; it’s collaborative. The lines between cannabis and hemp, between hemp and alcohol, and between DTC and retail are dissolving as we come together with shared purpose. The discourse that once defined these spaces—of ‘versus’ and ‘competition’—is being replaced by unity, association, and alignment across industries. This is no longer about hemp vs marijuana, cannabis vs alcohol, or even therapeutic vs non-therapeutic products. It’s about ensuring consumers have access to products that are right for them. It’s about building a world of informed choice, safe access, and collective opportunity. As we step into 2025, it’s clear that what drives us forward isn’t just innovation or growth. It’s unification around one central goal: service. To the consumer, to society, and to the world. Together, we’re collaborating not for individual benefit, but to ensure that consumers have the best options in the most generative, accessible, and meaningful ways. This is where we’re arriving now, together—as a collective community, as a society, and as humans. And that is the future we’re building. Here’s to 2025 and the beautiful world we are going to build together ❤️‍🔥
1:10

❤️‍🔥🌿🍄 BRĒZ | 2024 Recap 🎊 • $28MM in Revenue (+18.7x YoY Growth from ~$1.5M in 2023) 😮‍💨 • 8MM Cans Produced 🚀 • 650MM Impressions 🌍 • 2,000+ Retail Locations 🛒 • Featured in Rolling Stone, Forbes, GQ Magazine, VICE News, CNBC, NYLON, BevNET.com, Herb & many more 📰 2024 was the year BRĒZ planted its flag—not just as one of the fastest-growing (if not the fastest-growing) beverages in the world, but also one of the largest (if not the largest) cannabis beverages globally, while on the path to becoming the largest functional beverage in the world. But this isn’t just about BRĒZ's growth... Our success reflects the growth of an entire category, an entire community, and the collective efforts of those paving the way to conscious consumption. This year has shown us that the future of consumption is not divisive; it’s collaborative. The lines between cannabis and hemp, between hemp and alcohol, and between DTC and retail are dissolving as we come together with shared purpose. The discourse that once defined these spaces—of ‘versus’ and ‘competition’—is being replaced by unity, association, and alignment across industries. This is no longer about hemp vs marijuana, cannabis vs alcohol, or even therapeutic vs non-therapeutic products. It’s about ensuring consumers have access to products that are right for them. It’s about building a world of informed choice, safe access, and collective opportunity. As we step into 2025, it’s clear that what drives us forward isn’t just innovation or growth. It’s unification around one central goal: service. To the consumer, to society, and to the world. Together, we’re collaborating not for individual benefit, but to ensure that consumers have the best options in the most generative, accessible, and meaningful ways. This is where we’re arriving now, together—as a collective community, as a society, and as humans. And that is the future we’re building. Here’s to 2025 and the beautiful world we are going to build together ❤️‍🔥

Aaron Nosbisch

22,407 views • 1 year ago

Ash Sarkar, "What's your vision of the good life?" Zack Polanski, "I think it's one where we can spend more time with the people that we love" "Love and compassion are really important qualities that rarely get talked about in politics" "Politicians shied away from them because they felt a bit icky, or that the public might not like it" "But then how do we center compassion, not just for refugees but for each other, neighbours strangers" "A Universal Basic Income where people have food on the table, able to pay rent, transport to work, and feel supported" "One where we centre creativity and art, not just STEM subjects or a focus on growth in the way Reeves and Starmer turn us into these robotic machines" "Where we can spend time doing the things that we love, just for the sake of the fact that we love them even if there is no economic productivity at the end of it" "It's completely fine to be human beings" "Having spaces where you can have human connections with people" "We've had politics for so long that just gets people to divide, to point at each other, to be jealous, to talk about a faster car, or a bigger house, or another loft conversion" "The good life looks like when we can rid ourselves of all those addictions" "If you're living a comfortable life where you're more than surviving you're thriving, a good life looks like where you're not in constant competition to beat your neighbours or someone in your community" "You're actually going, what does it look like just to be happy and just to love, and that's good"
2:26

Ash Sarkar, "What's your vision of the good life?" Zack Polanski, "I think it's one where we can spend more time with the people that we love" "Love and compassion are really important qualities that rarely get talked about in politics" "Politicians shied away from them because they felt a bit icky, or that the public might not like it" "But then how do we center compassion, not just for refugees but for each other, neighbours strangers" "A Universal Basic Income where people have food on the table, able to pay rent, transport to work, and feel supported" "One where we centre creativity and art, not just STEM subjects or a focus on growth in the way Reeves and Starmer turn us into these robotic machines" "Where we can spend time doing the things that we love, just for the sake of the fact that we love them even if there is no economic productivity at the end of it" "It's completely fine to be human beings" "Having spaces where you can have human connections with people" "We've had politics for so long that just gets people to divide, to point at each other, to be jealous, to talk about a faster car, or a bigger house, or another loft conversion" "The good life looks like when we can rid ourselves of all those addictions" "If you're living a comfortable life where you're more than surviving you're thriving, a good life looks like where you're not in constant competition to beat your neighbours or someone in your community" "You're actually going, what does it look like just to be happy and just to love, and that's good"

Farrukh

45,330 views • 7 months ago