Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

think of the complex as an intricate coordination mechanism between systems - humans, code, and networks operating in strategic harmony. not totally controlled but not pure chaos. like in market dynamics (ideally speaking, the social logic of mutually beneficial exchange), these interactions create structures that no single entity could... manifest alone. imagine a tremendously dynamic network where developers, algorithms, and capital sync up unexpectedly - not just building infrastructure, but growing an ecosystem that learns and adapts. its less like a conventional industrial or financial complex and more like an evolving information apparatus where silicon and human intentionality can orchestrate something new together. thats the logic of complexity - finding that sweet spot between control and emergence where fresh possibilities materialize we build rig, rig builds us /arccellerateshow more

arc

48,426 subscribers

157,661 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Melted

Melted1 год назад

The future of Solana Lfg

Фото профиля FRANK E ELKINS

FRANK E ELKINS2 лет назад

Unlock the power of opposites! 🔑 Discover how our ability to distinguish between them shapes higher intelligence. Get your copy now and subscribe to our Free Weekly Newsletter for more thought-provoking insights delivered straight to you! (Book I Dualism)

Фото профиля Hajdut

Hajdut1 год назад

/arccellerate

Фото профиля illiquidLizard | 🐊

illiquidLizard | 🐊1 год назад

/arccellerate

Фото профиля DUSTY⚡️

DUSTY⚡️1 год назад

/hello_complex

Фото профиля Reuben

Reuben1 год назад

/arccelerate

Фото профиля Afro

Afro1 год назад

/arccellerate

Фото профиля hoi777

hoi7771 год назад

/arccellerate

Фото профиля ponzisaur

ponzisaur1 год назад

/arccelerate

Фото профиля XY

XY1 год назад

/arccellerate

Фото профиля polarr

polarr1 год назад

/arccelerate

Похожие видео

Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election

Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election

Acyn

625,035 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani: We will build a city hall that stands steadfast alongside jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of anti-semitism. Where the more than 1 million muslims know that they belong. Not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power… No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in islamophobia and win an election

Suppressed News.

36,360 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"The most likely outcome is an age of amazing abundance, where anyone can have anything they can think of. This may sound preposterous, but well, here we are in 2026. Let's see where we stand in 2036. There are things that could derail this, like a massive global thermonuclear war or something like that. But assuming that there's not World War III, I think we're headed for an age of amazing abundance. So this is, I guess, a message of optimism and excitement about the future." — Elon Musk

"The most likely outcome is an age of amazing abundance, where anyone can have anything they can think of. This may sound preposterous, but well, here we are in 2026. Let's see where we stand in 2036. There are things that could derail this, like a massive global thermonuclear war or something like that. But assuming that there's not World War III, I think we're headed for an age of amazing abundance. So this is, I guess, a message of optimism and excitement about the future." — Elon Musk

DogeDesigner

48,273 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

DN_DEGEN

71,364 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Chris Camillo explains why Pokémon cards might keep going up for decades “I’ve always believed that Pokémon and an IP similar to Pokémon for a collector is where it’s at” “Unlike other collectibles, it’s not set in a period of time where you have a peak where the people that were really into that baseball player or football player hit peak wealth and drive the market up and then the next generation has less of an appreciation for that player, like with sports cards” “I think Pokémon’s fascinating because they reinvent themselves for each generation. So it’s one of these really rare collectibles that has cross-generational demand” “You can make a case that the Pokémon market could stay healthy and continue to drive forward for a very long time” “I’m not saying it will but there’s certainly a thesis there that has data to back that up” “So the Pokémon collectors might not be as crazy as you think they are”

Chris Camillo explains why Pokémon cards might keep going up for decades “I’ve always believed that Pokémon and an IP similar to Pokémon for a collector is where it’s at” “Unlike other collectibles, it’s not set in a period of time where you have a peak where the people that were really into that baseball player or football player hit peak wealth and drive the market up and then the next generation has less of an appreciation for that player, like with sports cards” “I think Pokémon’s fascinating because they reinvent themselves for each generation. So it’s one of these really rare collectibles that has cross-generational demand” “You can make a case that the Pokémon market could stay healthy and continue to drive forward for a very long time” “I’m not saying it will but there’s certainly a thesis there that has data to back that up” “So the Pokémon collectors might not be as crazy as you think they are”

Jack

97,928 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“The fact that the President of this nation has to reappoint a new INEC chairman is a problem for everybody. INEC is an independent entity and the president can be bias£d as a human being and do something that favors him. INEC is suppose to have a governing body of its own. The president should not be in complete control of every institution just like the USA”

“The fact that the President of this nation has to reappoint a new INEC chairman is a problem for everybody. INEC is an independent entity and the president can be bias£d as a human being and do something that favors him. INEC is suppose to have a governing body of its own. The president should not be in complete control of every institution just like the USA”

Oyindamola🙄

80,905 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Looking at the new UFO footage from Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell's Sleeping Dog, I find myself asking: What the hell are these all made out of? It is possible that the word “craft” is already imposing too familiar a category on something far less conventional. What if these objects are not always composed of a material in any sense we would normally recognize? What if the hull is not an assembled exterior, but something closer to a materialized field condition: a stable interface between energy, geometry, and matter? A human aircraft is built from parts. Wings, alloys, rivets, electronics, engines. Its structure is mechanical, sectional, and industrial. But a sufficiently advanced non-human vehicle may not be “built” in that sense at all. What if it is "cohered"? Its surface might function less like armor and more like a programmable boundary layer: a physical skin capable of altering its optical, thermal, electromagnetic, and inertial behavior in real time. In that case, we may be looking at something that only resembles a machine because the human mind has no better category available. Perhaps the craft is not simply an object moving through an environment, but an engineered exception to the environment. #ufox #ufotwitter

Looking at the new UFO footage from Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell's Sleeping Dog, I find myself asking: What the hell are these all made out of? It is possible that the word “craft” is already imposing too familiar a category on something far less conventional. What if these objects are not always composed of a material in any sense we would normally recognize? What if the hull is not an assembled exterior, but something closer to a materialized field condition: a stable interface between energy, geometry, and matter? A human aircraft is built from parts. Wings, alloys, rivets, electronics, engines. Its structure is mechanical, sectional, and industrial. But a sufficiently advanced non-human vehicle may not be “built” in that sense at all. What if it is "cohered"? Its surface might function less like armor and more like a programmable boundary layer: a physical skin capable of altering its optical, thermal, electromagnetic, and inertial behavior in real time. In that case, we may be looking at something that only resembles a machine because the human mind has no better category available. Perhaps the craft is not simply an object moving through an environment, but an engineered exception to the environment. #ufox #ufotwitter

Tom Thompson🛸 (ＣＯＲＴＥＸＺＥＲＯ)

182,707 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When I say that Bitcoin is a currency of distrust, I'm just repeating what Bitcoin fans themselves say. There may be good reasons not to trust the banks and governments that create dollars, yens, and other currencies – but that doesn’t change the fact that the preference for Bitcoin is based on distrust of human institutions. Why is this an alarming development? Because the whole purpose of money is to create trust between strangers. Financial devices like currencies, bonds and shares – 90% of which are just data in computers – build trust between millions of strangers, who can then pool their knowledge and resources together, and cooperate. Humans control the world because we learned to do this. If we now lose trust in human institutions, this will limit the amount of money and handicap economic activity and cooperation. I hope that humanity finds a way to build trustworthy human institutions, instead of adopting technologies of distrust. #bitcoin #trust #distrust #crypto #currency #humanity #institutions #money #finance

When I say that Bitcoin is a currency of distrust, I'm just repeating what Bitcoin fans themselves say. There may be good reasons not to trust the banks and governments that create dollars, yens, and other currencies – but that doesn’t change the fact that the preference for Bitcoin is based on distrust of human institutions. Why is this an alarming development? Because the whole purpose of money is to create trust between strangers. Financial devices like currencies, bonds and shares – 90% of which are just data in computers – build trust between millions of strangers, who can then pool their knowledge and resources together, and cooperate. Humans control the world because we learned to do this. If we now lose trust in human institutions, this will limit the amount of money and handicap economic activity and cooperation. I hope that humanity finds a way to build trustworthy human institutions, instead of adopting technologies of distrust. #bitcoin #trust #distrust #crypto #currency #humanity #institutions #money #finance

Yuval Noah Harari

1,508,478 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Krishna on how Anthropic thinks about the platform vs. application layer, and when they decide to build their own products like Claude Code. It’s the question every investor and founder is thinking about: “Most of what we're building is platform. There's so many examples of where a platform can accrue a lot of value, but the customers who are building on that platform actually accrue even more value. We will build our own applications on that same platform where a couple of things are true. Number one, if we feel like we have a vision into where the models are going and we can demonstrate that and create customer value in that, that might be something like Claude Code. The second is thinking about ways to demonstrate value for the ecosystem that others might emulate. If you think about Claude for financial services or Claude for life sciences, these are ways in which we've composed the platform. We're building on the same platform as our customers. That creates a level playing field. We also think that there's so much value that's going to accrue in these areas that our customers can win and we can win as well. So I think of our strategy as mostly horizontal. A lot of the value is going to accrue to the customers that are building on top of it. Our goal is build the best models and then build the products and tools and services that allow that intelligence to proliferate within customers."

Krishna on how Anthropic thinks about the platform vs. application layer, and when they decide to build their own products like Claude Code. It’s the question every investor and founder is thinking about: “Most of what we're building is platform. There's so many examples of where a platform can accrue a lot of value, but the customers who are building on that platform actually accrue even more value. We will build our own applications on that same platform where a couple of things are true. Number one, if we feel like we have a vision into where the models are going and we can demonstrate that and create customer value in that, that might be something like Claude Code. The second is thinking about ways to demonstrate value for the ecosystem that others might emulate. If you think about Claude for financial services or Claude for life sciences, these are ways in which we've composed the platform. We're building on the same platform as our customers. That creates a level playing field. We also think that there's so much value that's going to accrue in these areas that our customers can win and we can win as well. So I think of our strategy as mostly horizontal. A lot of the value is going to accrue to the customers that are building on top of it. Our goal is build the best models and then build the products and tools and services that allow that intelligence to proliferate within customers."

Patrick OShaughnessy

113,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Axiom Math's Ashvin Swaminathan predicts we are entering an age where 99% of code will never be read by a human: "I'm very excited about the prospect of building our tool, AxiomProver, which can generate code that is maintainable and reusable. These are really important qualities for code to have in an age where 99% of code will not be read by a human ever." "This is a time where you can go to any available LLM and write a computer program, but you can't guarantee the program will be of a certain quality. So that's really important to us: quality, reusability, maintainability." "We believe these principles extend beyond the realm of pure mathematics, and that these skills will transfer to other tasks of fundamental importance in our world." Axiom Carina Hong

Axiom Math's Ashvin Swaminathan predicts we are entering an age where 99% of code will never be read by a human: "I'm very excited about the prospect of building our tool, AxiomProver, which can generate code that is maintainable and reusable. These are really important qualities for code to have in an age where 99% of code will not be read by a human ever." "This is a time where you can go to any available LLM and write a computer program, but you can't guarantee the program will be of a certain quality. So that's really important to us: quality, reusability, maintainability." "We believe these principles extend beyond the realm of pure mathematics, and that these skills will transfer to other tasks of fundamental importance in our world." Axiom Carina Hong

MTS

14,319 просмотров • 12 дней назад

McFaul: Ukrainian army, compared to where they were four and a half years ago, is a completely different army. Battle-tested, drone-armed, best fighting force in Europe and maybe one of the best fighting forces in the world, right? But you know who else got better at fighting and got better at drone warfare? Russian army. They’re different fighting force than they were in 2022 as well. And Latvians are not, Lithuanians are not, Estonians are not. And that’s where military asymmetry happens. And that’s where I worry that, in a country like Latvia, for instance, Putin might test whether the resolve of NATO is there, especially Article 5: an attack on one is an attack on all. That worries me, that he might test it, and then if we don’t all go together, that could create a kind of unraveling of the alliance. I think that’s a low-probability event, but not a zero-probability one.

McFaul: Ukrainian army, compared to where they were four and a half years ago, is a completely different army. Battle-tested, drone-armed, best fighting force in Europe and maybe one of the best fighting forces in the world, right? But you know who else got better at fighting and got better at drone warfare? Russian army. They’re different fighting force than they were in 2022 as well. And Latvians are not, Lithuanians are not, Estonians are not. And that’s where military asymmetry happens. And that’s where I worry that, in a country like Latvia, for instance, Putin might test whether the resolve of NATO is there, especially Article 5: an attack on one is an attack on all. That worries me, that he might test it, and then if we don’t all go together, that could create a kind of unraveling of the alliance. I think that’s a low-probability event, but not a zero-probability one.

Kate from Kharkiv

56,616 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Remote Viewer EXPOSES Elites Are USING AI to CONTROL OUR THOUGHTS. "A network sends EMF that affects people. Neurally. AI in the sky near Earth orbit. Static space sounds, pings and whirs." "Observation post monitors fixated. It downloads and tracks technology that affects human behavior and therefore politics and social climate." But that's not the worst of it. Remote Viewer, Dick Allgire, reveals a scarier future with AI leaders brainwashing humans: "This is where I got the guy that seems to be a character made by AI... something feels not real. He can mold opinion and convince and motivate, but it's like an image projection. Like a construct, like an AI character has a soothing voice admired, liked, persuasive, passionate. This person is ersatz, not real." "Multiple people. There's an adoring crowd, and they're moving in lockstep. They have a hive mind. They act as one. They reinforce each other's views and beliefs. These are robotic people lacking individuality. They speak with one voice. They repeat slogans. They're brainwashed. They're nudged like the Stepford Wives. They're dumbed down, lifeless eyes and controlled..."

Remote Viewer EXPOSES Elites Are USING AI to CONTROL OUR THOUGHTS. "A network sends EMF that affects people. Neurally. AI in the sky near Earth orbit. Static space sounds, pings and whirs." "Observation post monitors fixated. It downloads and tracks technology that affects human behavior and therefore politics and social climate." But that's not the worst of it. Remote Viewer, Dick Allgire, reveals a scarier future with AI leaders brainwashing humans: "This is where I got the guy that seems to be a character made by AI... something feels not real. He can mold opinion and convince and motivate, but it's like an image projection. Like a construct, like an AI character has a soothing voice admired, liked, persuasive, passionate. This person is ersatz, not real." "Multiple people. There's an adoring crowd, and they're moving in lockstep. They have a hive mind. They act as one. They reinforce each other's views and beliefs. These are robotic people lacking individuality. They speak with one voice. They repeat slogans. They're brainwashed. They're nudged like the Stepford Wives. They're dumbed down, lifeless eyes and controlled..."

Future Forecasting Group

13,453 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This clip is the most important section of the entire conversation. Stablecoins are accelerants to financial innovation. Global payment giants like Wise and PayPal spent over a decade and billions of dollars building global networks of banking partners, nostro and vostro accounts, and complex currency infrastructure. Today, stablecoins make it possible for a five-person startup to create a product with the same global functionality in just a few months and with almost no capital. Most people think of stablecoins simply as a better form of money, but I think they are more powerful as engines of economic opportunity and tools that give ambitious builders an edge over slower, legacy fintechs. John, Zach and Henri nailed it. Forward.

This clip is the most important section of the entire conversation. Stablecoins are accelerants to financial innovation. Global payment giants like Wise and PayPal spent over a decade and billions of dollars building global networks of banking partners, nostro and vostro accounts, and complex currency infrastructure. Today, stablecoins make it possible for a five-person startup to create a product with the same global functionality in just a few months and with almost no capital. Most people think of stablecoins simply as a better form of money, but I think they are more powerful as engines of economic opportunity and tools that give ambitious builders an edge over slower, legacy fintechs. John, Zach and Henri nailed it. Forward.

Dante Reminick

15,780 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Bret Weinstein on the Melania Trump AI teachers: "I get it. And it’s not that it is impossible to imagine robotic teachers doing an excellent job, but it is stunning to watch a sophisticated person fail to recognize what happens when you think that that’s what you’re going to produce, and you set it in motion. Let me point out that Wikipedia has many of the advantages that Melania is describing in this video. It is completely democratizing of knowledge, such that it doesn’t matter where on e arth you are. If you have an internet connection, you’ve got Wikipedia. It’s like an extension of your own mind, and it will make us all brilliant. Now, of course, that didn’t happen, did it? Wikipedia is a hellscape of misinformation, much of it targeted based on a political agenda. We are less certain of what we know, and less capable of reasoning on our own. Now, that doesn’t all come from Wikipedia, but my point is the promise of Wikipedia was not realized. And what we got instead is arguably worse than what we had before it was invented. The same thing is virtually guaranteed here, because you’re talking about not only the capability of educating students using a robot that has vastly more knowledge than a human teacher would, but you’re talking about the irresistible opportunity to capture those minds and steer them in one direction or another, whether that’s political or economic. The idea that these robotic teachers are going to be immune to the kind of flights of fancy that have ruined teaching in the modern era is preposterous. In fact, they will likely be even more easily steered. I would caution everyone to simply realize the distinction between complicated systems and complex systems. AI is a complex system. Human beings are complex systems. And any time you intervene in these systems, thinking you know what’s going to happen, you’re going to be embarrassed by the discovery of the unintended consequences that will come to dominate your project. As much as I like the idea of smarter, wiser, more empathic teachers, and as much as those possibilities do exist in the space of AI, we are still at a very early point in this revolution, and anybody who thinks they can predict it with this kind of precision is actually a hazard."

Bret Weinstein on the Melania Trump AI teachers: "I get it. And it’s not that it is impossible to imagine robotic teachers doing an excellent job, but it is stunning to watch a sophisticated person fail to recognize what happens when you think that that’s what you’re going to produce, and you set it in motion. Let me point out that Wikipedia has many of the advantages that Melania is describing in this video. It is completely democratizing of knowledge, such that it doesn’t matter where on e arth you are. If you have an internet connection, you’ve got Wikipedia. It’s like an extension of your own mind, and it will make us all brilliant. Now, of course, that didn’t happen, did it? Wikipedia is a hellscape of misinformation, much of it targeted based on a political agenda. We are less certain of what we know, and less capable of reasoning on our own. Now, that doesn’t all come from Wikipedia, but my point is the promise of Wikipedia was not realized. And what we got instead is arguably worse than what we had before it was invented. The same thing is virtually guaranteed here, because you’re talking about not only the capability of educating students using a robot that has vastly more knowledge than a human teacher would, but you’re talking about the irresistible opportunity to capture those minds and steer them in one direction or another, whether that’s political or economic. The idea that these robotic teachers are going to be immune to the kind of flights of fancy that have ruined teaching in the modern era is preposterous. In fact, they will likely be even more easily steered. I would caution everyone to simply realize the distinction between complicated systems and complex systems. AI is a complex system. Human beings are complex systems. And any time you intervene in these systems, thinking you know what’s going to happen, you’re going to be embarrassed by the discovery of the unintended consequences that will come to dominate your project. As much as I like the idea of smarter, wiser, more empathic teachers, and as much as those possibilities do exist in the space of AI, we are still at a very early point in this revolution, and anybody who thinks they can predict it with this kind of precision is actually a hazard."

The DarkHorse Podcast

48,380 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Prasad

279,492 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

joe locke: "i think at the moment i'm in this place where i feel like everything i get sent now is for another vulnerable skinny twink. which is great. and i know i can do that. and i'm really honored that the industry sees me as, like, the go-to guy to be the vulnerable gay guy. and it's holding space for both that feeling of, like, wow, this is an amazing thing, but also like, oh, but i know i can do other things, and i really want to be able to prove myself that i can, or prove to people that i can do other things. what's not, like, coming across like a bit of an asshole being like, oh, well, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, because, you know, i'm so grateful that i'm in the opportunity to be able to be seen as that, but i also, i'm also someone who always wants to prove themselves, and so i want to be able to do that. so, i don't know what that, like, to me, what that is, whether it's like a film that has nothing to do with sexuality, a film where i play a straight guy, a film where i even play a gay character that's just not like charlie. but i think that it's almost that, like, it's that, like, classic, like, miley cyrus thing of, like, her post-disney days where she—but with less disrespect and with a torrent of respect to the character of charlie." 🎥:

joe locke: "i think at the moment i'm in this place where i feel like everything i get sent now is for another vulnerable skinny twink. which is great. and i know i can do that. and i'm really honored that the industry sees me as, like, the go-to guy to be the vulnerable gay guy. and it's holding space for both that feeling of, like, wow, this is an amazing thing, but also like, oh, but i know i can do other things, and i really want to be able to prove myself that i can, or prove to people that i can do other things. what's not, like, coming across like a bit of an asshole being like, oh, well, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, because, you know, i'm so grateful that i'm in the opportunity to be able to be seen as that, but i also, i'm also someone who always wants to prove themselves, and so i want to be able to do that. so, i don't know what that, like, to me, what that is, whether it's like a film that has nothing to do with sexuality, a film where i play a straight guy, a film where i even play a gay character that's just not like charlie. but i think that it's almost that, like, it's that, like, classic, like, miley cyrus thing of, like, her post-disney days where she—but with less disrespect and with a torrent of respect to the character of charlie." 🎥:

daily joe locke

33,980 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.Applied Intuition CTO Peter Ludwig says the model is only 1% of a physical AI system: "General purpose models that come from companies like Anthropic or OpenAI, those are great and they're very useful for very general purpose tasks. But when you're dealing with things that have a very deep safety-critical component, things where lives are literally on the line... just the model is not enough." "That's like 1% of the full solution." "These very, very complex workflows to actually build physical AI maybe would require switching between 20 different tools in the past for different tasks, and deeply understanding the precise flow of information between all of those things to accomplish your end goal." "Now with Dana, all of those complex workflows can be very seamlessly orchestrated from an agentic interface where you're able to write things in plain English and receive answers in plain English." Business Breakdowns

.Applied Intuition CTO Peter Ludwig says the model is only 1% of a physical AI system: "General purpose models that come from companies like Anthropic or OpenAI, those are great and they're very useful for very general purpose tasks. But when you're dealing with things that have a very deep safety-critical component, things where lives are literally on the line... just the model is not enough." "That's like 1% of the full solution." "These very, very complex workflows to actually build physical AI maybe would require switching between 20 different tools in the past for different tasks, and deeply understanding the precise flow of information between all of those things to accomplish your end goal." "Now with Dana, all of those complex workflows can be very seamlessly orchestrated from an agentic interface where you're able to write things in plain English and receive answers in plain English." Business Breakdowns

a16z

34,880 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too complex for us to fully grasp. Millions or even trillions of parameters interact in ways no human can trace. We can observe what they do, we can measure accuracy, behavior, and output but not truly explain why they do it. Their reasoning isn’t transparent; it’s emergent. In a sense, we’ve created alien intelligences born from our math, still tethered to our code yet evolving patterns we can’t decode. The machines are doing something beyond our comprehension and that might be both the most exciting and the most unsettling thing about the age of AI.

Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too complex for us to fully grasp. Millions or even trillions of parameters interact in ways no human can trace. We can observe what they do, we can measure accuracy, behavior, and output but not truly explain why they do it. Their reasoning isn’t transparent; it’s emergent. In a sense, we’ve created alien intelligences born from our math, still tethered to our code yet evolving patterns we can’t decode. The machines are doing something beyond our comprehension and that might be both the most exciting and the most unsettling thing about the age of AI.

VraserX e/acc

376,491 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.

Dustin

19,043 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад