Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Thinking Machines Lab co-founder & CEO Mira Murati on why "killer instinct" isn't what gets her out of bed to compete with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and X: Bloomberg host Emily Chang pushes her on whether she has the ruthlessness the moment seems to demand. Her answer reframes the... question entirely: "In terms of killer instinct, I'd say that's not really what motivates me." Murati's real driver is potential: "I think there's actually a lot of room. We're building a technology that has infinite potential. And I think that it's going to be hard to capture all of that potential." So what does get her out of bed? "What motivates me is really capturing part of that potential, creating useful things in the world, bringing the technology into the world in a way that's useful and increases human agency and advances our civilization." Mira Murati sees competition as a feature, not a threat: "There is healthy competition and competition is good. It actually creates better products and better technologies for people. It raises the bar in many ways. And I respect a lot of the companies that are doing this." But the bottom line is clear: "My motivation is not necessarily day-to-day. When I wake up in the morning, I am not thinking about how to kill the competitor." In a race where everyone else seems to be playing offense, Murati is playing a different game entirely — one defined not by who she's fighting against, but by what she's building toward.show more

Big Brain AI

15,675 subscribers

38,592 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Mira Murati says the outcome of frontier AI is not predestined: "Predicting a dystopia or a utopia, to me, feels very simplified because the truth is we actually have a lot of agency in how we build this technology, in the tools that we're building, how we're deploying it." "There are certainly those risks. We all understand the potential for greatness that comes with building frontier AI systems, and that's why we're working on them." "Where I might disagree or take a different path is that I think we have a lot of agency. This period of time where both humans and AI systems have their hands on the wheel, and we can collaborate, it's a very important time to get right." Mira Murati at Bloomberg Tech live with Emily Chang

Mira Murati says the outcome of frontier AI is not predestined: "Predicting a dystopia or a utopia, to me, feels very simplified because the truth is we actually have a lot of agency in how we build this technology, in the tools that we're building, how we're deploying it." "There are certainly those risks. We all understand the potential for greatness that comes with building frontier AI systems, and that's why we're working on them." "Where I might disagree or take a different path is that I think we have a lot of agency. This period of time where both humans and AI systems have their hands on the wheel, and we can collaborate, it's a very important time to get right." Mira Murati at Bloomberg Tech live with Emily Chang

a16z

120,307 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Devens cam talks about Taylor...LONG quote incoming: "The prevailing thought about Taylor is that she's actively not participating in the game. I like Taylor. I think she's a very cool person, but she stays in the bed the majority of the day. [...] We both got to bed early, but when I'm not in bed, I'm out and about. [...] Taylor just stays back in her pod all day. She doesn't get up in the morning until she's forced. She goes to bed right at 10pm." "Even at the noms ceremony, what she was yelling at us, if you look through it, was 'I'm actively not participating in the game. I don't say anyone's name. I don't do anything.' I don't want to vote for anyone that does that. I don't want someone like that to win the game. I want people who are excited to be here and want to be a part of this. And I don't want her on the jury, I don't think I could get Taylor's vote." "So, of the three up there now, I'd want to vote Taylor off, even though Lala is like actively after me, I'm more worried about Taylor. And honestly at least Lala is playing man. She's up in the morning, yeah she goes to bed early too, so do I, but she's out all day." "Whereas Taylor is just...literally it's frustrating. It's like other people would love to be here Taylor and love to be doing this. Why aren't you participating? And she never has. It's not like she's reached a state of [being] depressed and away from home too long. She has always stayed in her bed, all day." "And maybe that's a strategy. I know she's whispering stuff behind the scenes, like she is playing, I get that, but it's not a strategy I respect. You know I don't even like people throwing comps and I think throwing comps can make all the sense in the world. I play to win everything, that's kinda dumb, I get that. But staying in your bed, like I gotta vote you out. I don't want you on that jury." #BB28 #BBBitez

Devens cam talks about Taylor...LONG quote incoming: "The prevailing thought about Taylor is that she's actively not participating in the game. I like Taylor. I think she's a very cool person, but she stays in the bed the majority of the day. [...] We both got to bed early, but when I'm not in bed, I'm out and about. [...] Taylor just stays back in her pod all day. She doesn't get up in the morning until she's forced. She goes to bed right at 10pm." "Even at the noms ceremony, what she was yelling at us, if you look through it, was 'I'm actively not participating in the game. I don't say anyone's name. I don't do anything.' I don't want to vote for anyone that does that. I don't want someone like that to win the game. I want people who are excited to be here and want to be a part of this. And I don't want her on the jury, I don't think I could get Taylor's vote." "So, of the three up there now, I'd want to vote Taylor off, even though Lala is like actively after me, I'm more worried about Taylor. And honestly at least Lala is playing man. She's up in the morning, yeah she goes to bed early too, so do I, but she's out all day." "Whereas Taylor is just...literally it's frustrating. It's like other people would love to be here Taylor and love to be doing this. Why aren't you participating? And she never has. It's not like she's reached a state of [being] depressed and away from home too long. She has always stayed in her bed, all day." "And maybe that's a strategy. I know she's whispering stuff behind the scenes, like she is playing, I get that, but it's not a strategy I respect. You know I don't even like people throwing comps and I think throwing comps can make all the sense in the world. I play to win everything, that's kinda dumb, I get that. But staying in your bed, like I gotta vote you out. I don't want you on that jury." #BB28 #BBBitez

Big Brother Bitez 🔊

343,799 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Kate Harrison "Really, what we're seeing reported, Katie, in the media, is not all that different than a lot of the terms that were being discussed last October." "So it begs the question, what has the government been up to in that time?" "And I think in the absence of a bigger and better trade deal, it's going to be very difficult to rationalize to Canadians and perhaps more acutely to premiers, that this is in the best interest of all parties." Kate Harrison

Kate Harrison "Really, what we're seeing reported, Katie, in the media, is not all that different than a lot of the terms that were being discussed last October." "So it begs the question, what has the government been up to in that time?" "And I think in the absence of a bigger and better trade deal, it's going to be very difficult to rationalize to Canadians and perhaps more acutely to premiers, that this is in the best interest of all parties." Kate Harrison

cbcwatcher

32,451 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Asmongold says he would not bet on Mizkif prevailing in his lawsuit against Emiru and explains why he thinks the judge approving moving forward with the lawsuit doesn't mean much "Not what I would bet on so far..it's not going to happen (an apology from Emiru in a potential settlement)" "It's bc he basically didn't define it correctly and the judge wants to have a more definitive..that's part of Emi's case and not mine, so I'm not gonna really make a lot of comments on that..to the extent that anything else comes out, I think that it will only further entrench this problem..there are a lot of things that are not public..but when they are made public, I think they'll be very revealing" "U have a lot more to go through than just like one specific thing..and there's a very very long process and something not getting thrown out immediately is like not really that big of a deal"

Asmongold says he would not bet on Mizkif prevailing in his lawsuit against Emiru and explains why he thinks the judge approving moving forward with the lawsuit doesn't mean much "Not what I would bet on so far..it's not going to happen (an apology from Emiru in a potential settlement)" "It's bc he basically didn't define it correctly and the judge wants to have a more definitive..that's part of Emi's case and not mine, so I'm not gonna really make a lot of comments on that..to the extent that anything else comes out, I think that it will only further entrench this problem..there are a lot of things that are not public..but when they are made public, I think they'll be very revealing" "U have a lot more to go through than just like one specific thing..and there's a very very long process and something not getting thrown out immediately is like not really that big of a deal"

yeet

73,332 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🗣️ Bryson DeChambeau: "Realizing how big this world actually is - yeah, golf in the States is massive and it's one of the most impressive markets in the world for sure, but realizing that there's others out there, as well, and that there's an underserved market was something that we saw and thought that it would be an amazing opportunity for us to grow the game globally, and that's what LIV has done" "I think as I look at it now, what's really impacted me the most is the cultural barriers that get broken down, in a good way, with the game of golf. Everybody comes together. I think that's what's really special about LIV. I think that's what's really special about the game of golf" "We'd be doing ourselves a disservice if we didn't continue to do that. I think there's value in the States. There's value outside of the States. There's a way to match both" #LIVGolfKorea | Crushers GC

🗣️ Bryson DeChambeau: "Realizing how big this world actually is - yeah, golf in the States is massive and it's one of the most impressive markets in the world for sure, but realizing that there's others out there, as well, and that there's an underserved market was something that we saw and thought that it would be an amazing opportunity for us to grow the game globally, and that's what LIV has done" "I think as I look at it now, what's really impacted me the most is the cultural barriers that get broken down, in a good way, with the game of golf. Everybody comes together. I think that's what's really special about LIV. I think that's what's really special about the game of golf" "We'd be doing ourselves a disservice if we didn't continue to do that. I think there's value in the States. There's value outside of the States. There's a way to match both" #LIVGolfKorea | Crushers GC

LIV Golf

60,620 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ELON: I ENSURE GREAT ENGINEERS CAN FLOURISH AT MY COMPANIES “I consider one of my core responsibilities in running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. And I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody is a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies, engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable, and you're paid so much money, but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. They don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say, a good engineer went in and what did they get out? The output of that engineering talent seems very low. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding. You're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's going to be really cool, and it's not going to be easy. But if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think, to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Source: Tesla AI Day, September 2022

ELON: I ENSURE GREAT ENGINEERS CAN FLOURISH AT MY COMPANIES “I consider one of my core responsibilities in running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. And I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody is a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies, engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable, and you're paid so much money, but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. They don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say, a good engineer went in and what did they get out? The output of that engineering talent seems very low. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding. You're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's going to be really cool, and it's not going to be easy. But if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think, to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Source: Tesla AI Day, September 2022

Mario Nawfal

20,354,729 просмотров • 1 год назад

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

39,084 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

An animated Rick Bell asks the question that a lot of people ask, what is it that the Ottawa Bubble wants Poilievre to change? "I've seen a lot of commentary on he must change, but there's not a lot of specifics, not a lot of battle plan on what it is he actually has to do to attract that so called mushy middle voter and expand the base of the Conservative Party." "For instance, speaking about that MP that crossed the floor, what is that thing they want him to say? Is it policy? Is it character? Is it tone? Is it not as much grievance? Is it more solution? What is it? I don't know." Cochrane "I think the answer is yes." Yes, partisan Cochrane always oooozes that out in the end Chris Carter CEO | PDG rick bell

An animated Rick Bell asks the question that a lot of people ask, what is it that the Ottawa Bubble wants Poilievre to change? "I've seen a lot of commentary on he must change, but there's not a lot of specifics, not a lot of battle plan on what it is he actually has to do to attract that so called mushy middle voter and expand the base of the Conservative Party." "For instance, speaking about that MP that crossed the floor, what is that thing they want him to say? Is it policy? Is it character? Is it tone? Is it not as much grievance? Is it more solution? What is it? I don't know." Cochrane "I think the answer is yes." Yes, partisan Cochrane always oooozes that out in the end Chris Carter CEO | PDG rick bell

cbcwatcher

31,946 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Azura Stevens on Rickea Jackson's potential to be a two-way player. "I think she's tired of people saying her defense isn't good. I think she's a good defender. She's really long. She's super athletic. She's smart. I can see the growth every year of her learning the game better. I think she could be a really great two-way player, and obviously, we all know her offensive potential, but defensively, I think she can really grow into that, and I think she has. I think she's just tired of people thinking that she doesn't play defense". #Skytown

Azura Stevens on Rickea Jackson's potential to be a two-way player. "I think she's tired of people saying her defense isn't good. I think she's a good defender. She's really long. She's super athletic. She's smart. I can see the growth every year of her learning the game better. I think she could be a really great two-way player, and obviously, we all know her offensive potential, but defensively, I think she can really grow into that, and I think she has. I think she's just tired of people thinking that she doesn't play defense". #Skytown

Chicago State of Mind Sports

133,832 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”

BTC Clips

114,246 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

Tanz Cho 💹🧲

12,294 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

The Peel

209,752 просмотров • 1 год назад

"AOC has changed" AOC before she got to Congress: "there are a lot of folks that I think sometimes want to brand me as a flame thrower. Really the truth, I think the truth of what I am is a consensus builder. I like to think that I am persuasive, and so I think a lot of that work is gonna be on building relationships and trying to persuade and talk to my colleagues on building a progressive agenda for the Party." Sounds like the same 2026 AOC to me!

Winter

92,757 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! Nick Shirley just gave the PERFECT response "What do you say to young conservatives who see their country slipping away and want to make a difference?" SHIRLEY: "Knowing that there is absolute truth in this world, and the truth of this world is fraud is fraud, and fraud is bad, for example." "When you know that what you're doing is right, you really shouldn't have to fear anything." "And so, like me, I don't fear it because I know I'm not doing anything wrong, because I know I'm seeking the truth." "And I think that's important for people to question things and seek for that truth in order to really get a better understanding of what's actually happening." "That's the only way we're going to know if the LEARING Center is a real daycare or not, for example. But I think just going out and doing stuff and making stuff happen." Nick shirley 💯💯

🚨 WOW! Nick Shirley just gave the PERFECT response "What do you say to young conservatives who see their country slipping away and want to make a difference?" SHIRLEY: "Knowing that there is absolute truth in this world, and the truth of this world is fraud is fraud, and fraud is bad, for example." "When you know that what you're doing is right, you really shouldn't have to fear anything." "And so, like me, I don't fear it because I know I'm not doing anything wrong, because I know I'm seeking the truth." "And I think that's important for people to question things and seek for that truth in order to really get a better understanding of what's actually happening." "That's the only way we're going to know if the LEARING Center is a real daycare or not, for example. But I think just going out and doing stuff and making stuff happen." Nick shirley 💯💯

Eric Daugherty

71,709 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I explain why the accusation that Israel is committing "genocide" is blood libel. Me: The application of the word genocide to refer to tens of thousands of war deaths is, I mean, I think it is a kind of blood libel. It's trying to import the moral opprobrium that we associate with genocide to a designated enemy, in this case, Israel. I think because I alluded to my side bias, the sides in this case being the sides that a lot of hard left critical theory has defined, namely white oppressors against everyone else's victims. Moynihan: It's pretty strong to say this is like a blood libel. Me: Well, it is a blood libel in the sense that it is an accusation of deliberate murder, ill-founded in that the, and one could disagree with Israel's campaign against Gaza, one could say that this is not justifiable, it's not a just war. It's still different from deliberately murdering as many people as possible, as in, and we know there have been genocides. I think it really is a terrible blood libel, and it's a sign of how people's moralizing in the service of demonizing and dichotomizing, dividing the world into good and evil can just flatten their ability to analyze and to think clearly.

I explain why the accusation that Israel is committing "genocide" is blood libel. Me: The application of the word genocide to refer to tens of thousands of war deaths is, I mean, I think it is a kind of blood libel. It's trying to import the moral opprobrium that we associate with genocide to a designated enemy, in this case, Israel. I think because I alluded to my side bias, the sides in this case being the sides that a lot of hard left critical theory has defined, namely white oppressors against everyone else's victims. Moynihan: It's pretty strong to say this is like a blood libel. Me: Well, it is a blood libel in the sense that it is an accusation of deliberate murder, ill-founded in that the, and one could disagree with Israel's campaign against Gaza, one could say that this is not justifiable, it's not a just war. It's still different from deliberately murdering as many people as possible, as in, and we know there have been genocides. I think it really is a terrible blood libel, and it's a sign of how people's moralizing in the service of demonizing and dichotomizing, dividing the world into good and evil can just flatten their ability to analyze and to think clearly.

Steven Pinker

392,505 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 просмотров • 1 год назад