Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
This AI Agent made debugging 10x faster My website had a SERIOUS bug. So, I created 2 MiniMax Code CLI Agents: → BUG-FIXER Agent → FEATURE Agent Both Agents were working AT THE SAME TIME. Check the thread. NO code conflicts because both AI Agents were working on different... show more
14,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)
36 Kommentare

1. BUG-FIXER Agent: Worked on the scroll animation BUG. 2. FEATURE Agent: Worked on improving the UI. It also created a Dark & Light theme toggle button. After both AI Agents finished CODING in parallel, they merged the GIT branches. They also spun up a new SERVER to show me the final OUTPUT.

TRY NOW 👇 I might NEVER go back to an AI coding IDE again. Because your terminal already has: → Git branches → Tests → Scripts → CI/CD → Remote servers And now your AI agent lives there too.

The interesting shift here is from AI-assisted coding to AI-managed development workflows.

Parallel agents could seriously cut down the time spent waiting on routine fixes.

That's an impressive use of AI for debugging. The parallel agent approach on different branches is a smart way to handle simultaneous work without conflicts.

Well

The terminal becoming the AI coding environment makes a lot of sense when everything you need is already there.

That's super cool! Glad the AI agents worked out for you. Sounds like a clever way to tackle bugs.

I like this more than having one agent babysit the entire codebase

The key is that the agents aren't just generating code, they're operating inside the existing dev workflow.

love this share

Impressive share

Nice

I’d still want tests running automatically before trusting both branches to merge.

That's pretty neat. Using AI for debugging sounds like a game-changer.

Honestly, having agents work independently and merge their changes feels way more scalable.

I like

Great share

Parallel bug-fixer + feature agents is the right shape. Measure merged PRs that survive review, not agent count — and log how often humans still rewrote the hard path.

running two agents on separate branches is such a clean way to dodge conflicts

@darshal_ That's like magic! Was wrestling with branch merges myself last week. Automating it must feel like a superpower.

AI writing code is cool. AI understanding the Git workflow around that code is way more useful.

This was a genuinely enjoyable read. Loved the way you put this together.

Running two agents in parallel on separate Git branches is actually a pretty clean workflow

two agents, separate branches, zero conflicts. the hardest part is still remembering which branch I opened.

Parallel agents could seriously cut down the time spent waiting on routine fixes.

The terminal has quietly become a pretty powerful AI workspace.

That new server spin-up at the end is a nice touch 👀

This is probably the closest I’ve seen to treating AI agents like actual dev teammates.

git workflow is keeping the agents from destroying each other

Bug fixing while another agent handles UI improvements... that's actually a solid setup

the fact that they can work simultaneously without stepping on each other is the interesting part

One agent debugging while another ships a feature? Yeah, I can see the appeal.

how did you ensure there were absolutely no code conflicts with both agents?

Amazing post

That's super smart! Using AI for debugging sounds like a game-changer. Glad it worked out for you.
