正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Agent Zero crushed Codex by 2.6× on token efficiency! We gave both agents the same task on the same local model (Qwen3.6 27B): build a retro Q*bert arcade game. Each agent wrote and rewrote it across iterations, adding enemies and a HUD. Outputs: • Agent Zero: 239K tokens, 53...

320,509 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

GitLawb 的头像
GitLawb3 个月前

Zero is amazing

atomic.chat 的头像
atomic.chat3 个月前

Run Local AI Models and agents:

Aman 的头像
Aman3 个月前

2.6x fewer tokens is actually insane

atomic.chat 的头像
atomic.chat3 个月前

true. especially when we are speaking about limited context window :)

XiaoXin|201.eth 的头像
XiaoXin|201.eth3 个月前

this is @Agent0ai not @gitlawb

aditya 的头像
aditya3 个月前

Tokens optimisation 🫡

augmented things 的头像
augmented things3 个月前

Wow. That’s great.

🏆🇧🇷💎Jack Hunter 💎 🇧🇷🎖️🥇 的头像
🏆🇧🇷💎Jack Hunter 💎 🇧🇷🎖️🥇3 个月前

Cool! @gitlawb’s Zero is great indeed!!

dumbfoundry 的头像
dumbfoundry3 个月前

thanks for sharing, fyi @agent0ai is not from gitlawb

Luis Gamas 的头像
Luis Gamas3 个月前

Zero is hands down one of the best open-source harnesses I've used, imagine being able to invoke it right from your phone 👀👇

Prompt Heat 的头像
Prompt Heat3 个月前

can i use witf gpt-gemini or claude and cline-opencode-Cursor sub in this cli tool???

William Belfort 的头像
William Belfort3 个月前

Interesting… 👀

Frosty40 的头像
Frosty403 个月前

where is the prompt for this one? would love to test my private harness just to see how it compares.

Rob 的头像
Rob3 个月前

Agent Zero is still around? The same Agent Zero that came out around the time CrewAI popped up? Neat, might have to revisit them

mardi 的头像
mardi3 个月前

nice try... the power being showcased in this video is the real agent zero → @Agent0ai interesting that the gitlawb account doesn't even seem to know what its own software looks like

Alessandro Frau 的头像
Alessandro Frau3 个月前

Thank you so much for showing Agent Zero capabilities and efficiency 🫶🏼

SSH 的头像
SSH3 个月前

if you really want the biggest token efficiency boosts then use Grug!

Carter Jiang 的头像
Carter Jiang3 个月前

2.6x fewer tokens and it actually built a working game? That's the real flex. Most "efficient" agents just output less, not better.

Saman Ahmed 的头像
Saman Ahmed3 个月前

The token count is only part of the story.

Trần Ngọc Sơn 的头像
Trần Ngọc Sơn3 个月前

Compare it to the cursor.

Pixel 的头像
Pixel3 个月前

Cleaner context management = fewer hallucinations and better final output.

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB 的头像
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB3 个月前

时间差不多,token 差这么多挺离谱

稳住拿好等风来 的头像
稳住拿好等风来3 个月前

@Agent0ai

Jinjala dinesh 的头像
Jinjala dinesh3 个月前

Please fight on terminal bench

Mark R Pommrehn 的头像
Mark R Pommrehn3 个月前

Nice!

Epoch Lens | AI & Tech 的头像
Epoch Lens | AI & Tech3 个月前

Codex used 388K extra tokens to finish 2 minutes faster. The agentic equivalent of running git log -p --all before changing 1 line.

euxaristia 的头像
euxaristia3 个月前

Better output, less tokens. Zero is goated

BeastTitanHunter 的头像
BeastTitanHunter3 个月前

@thsottiaux @OpenAI !!!!!

Dany Boy 的头像
Dany Boy3 个月前

@grok what music is this? Love it

AshutoshShrivastava 的头像
AshutoshShrivastava3 个月前

agent architecture matters a lot .

Michael 的头像
Michael3 个月前

Agent One crushed Agent Zero by 5x on token efficiency

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide3 个月前

Only sending what's new instead of the whole history is such a clean fix.

Carry 的头像
Carry3 个月前

one benchmark on a retro game and the headline is 2.6x lol what does this look like on something with real dependencies 😐

Amitakshya Sutar 的头像
Amitakshya Sutar3 个月前

@all Can anyone tell me what font is used for that zero ? I’m kind of obsessed with that style of art.

AAD 的头像
AAD3 个月前

It’s not @gitlawb btw, it’s a fork of agent zero (real one)

相关视频

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.

Jurij Skornik

11,180 次观看 • 5 个月前

Qwen3.8-Max became the brain of Atomic Agent, Hermes and OpenClaw. We gave the same task: Turn a photo of a hand-drawn floor plan into an interactive 3D walkthrough of that apartment and open it in the browser. Outputs: – Atomic Agent: 66 min, 557K tokens, $2.01 – OpenClaw: 32 min, 1.2M tokens, $1.12 – Hermes: 2 h 14 min, 4.2M tokens, $6.42 Before the start we leveled the field: one model endpoint, equal step and token budgets, equal timeouts, full autonomy, memory wiped on all three. Atomic Agent reads images through its vision tool, so it interrogated the sketch 14 times until every room, door and window turned into data. Then it drafted the whole scene in its head six times, threw away five drafts, and wrote the finished 19.8 KB file in one single write. After that it opened Chrome, checked its own render, and only then replied. The only agent of the three that verified its work, and the only one that stopped on its own. OpenClaw was twice as fast and the cheapest of the three, but its image tool kept timing out mid-run, and it shipped the palest apartment of the day: white rooms, no floor colors, one texture visibly glitched, and furniture you have to squint to find. It read the full plan three times, cut 11 room crops, wrote the scene in chunks, and landed the fastest and cheapest apartment of the day in 32 minutes. Then it kept polishing the finished file until we pulled the plug. Hermes worked the longest: two hours, 97 model calls, 4.2M tokens, and the apartment came out wrong anyway: doors standing loose in the middle of rooms, a 2 by 1.8 bath sprawled across a quarter of the flat, furniture drifting away from the plan. It measured everything twice and still built the least accurate apartment. Atomic Agent will run Qwen3.8-27B locally on day zero, next week!

Atomic Agent

123,376 次观看 • 2 个月前