Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
This ball had a 99% catch probability for the CF and a 90% catch probability for the RF:
619,733 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
12 Yorum

Did all three of them get terrible jumps? Or did they all slow down thinking “one of them has it”?

Yes and yes? Springer's jump was -19 feet below average, Barger's was -8.2. Though I suppose a little of that could be because their initial read was that it wasn't going to be their ball.

Trusted by 90% of the NBA, Noah Basketball uses the most advanced technology to measure the key elements of the perfect shot, providing real-time data with instant, audio feedback showing players exactly what they need to do to improve their shooting percentages.

Can you share the catch probability for Kirk's 2 run-double in the top of the ninth? Felt like that shoulda been caught, but won't complain lol.

It was low, just 5%. I'd be a little concerned with Grisham's jumps, though, he's consistently getting poor ones. On this play his was -12.8 feet below average.

I was next to the bullpen and I swore that was headed straight for me I don’t blame Springer at all was just weird off the bat

Springer has had a great career, and I hope it continues, but why in the world would anyone play him at centerfield? Especially at age 35?

Dalton Varsho come back to me

Usually the Yankees are on the other end of these

Springer's jump was so bad, he I think even took a step back. Maybe he was fooled by the swing and given the RF got a bad jump, maybe the swing fooled both of them. Cody knew right away it was a pop-up.

All these statistics are nothing if the players did not do their job.

I'd say the statistics make it pretty clear the players did not do their job.


