Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This dude has a question for the protesters. “Why are you standing in the road blocking innocent people from living their lives?” “You do know that it does not make them wanna support your cause?” That’s a great question that the world would love an answer to. There is... show more

One Bad Dude

326,563 subscribers

14,794 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Phillip to Jennings: When you answer my question with a question, you are dodging. Answer the question. It is very telling that you are not able to entertain an answer.

Phillip to Jennings: When you answer my question with a question, you are dodging. Answer the question. It is very telling that you are not able to entertain an answer.

Acyn

162,856 просмотров • 1 год назад

Honest question.. Why would anyone think that blocking traffic would garner support for your cause? Because it 100% does the opposite.

Honest question.. Why would anyone think that blocking traffic would garner support for your cause? Because it 100% does the opposite.

TONY™

24,335 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

There Should Be People Going to Prison Michael Laws, 8 Dec 2022: "We now know that whether you're vaxxed or not, it doesn't stop transmission, and the question you ask, is when did they know that? And if the answer to that question is we knew it before we put in the mandates, there should be people going to prison. Because that would then mean that you purposefully lied to all of us."

There Should Be People Going to Prison Michael Laws, 8 Dec 2022: "We now know that whether you're vaxxed or not, it doesn't stop transmission, and the question you ask, is when did they know that? And if the answer to that question is we knew it before we put in the mandates, there should be people going to prison. Because that would then mean that you purposefully lied to all of us."

Coronavirus Plushie

43,863 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Congresswoman Lisa McClain Says Anyone In Government Who Refuses To Answer Questions & Deflects, Needs To Be Replaced “I'm gonna share with the American people, if you get somebody who's in charge, especially in a government entity that can't answer a question, you should ask yourself, do we need to replace this person who can't answer a simple question? I mean, my goodness gracious. The disappointment that I have that you can't even answer a simple question is unbelievable. Yet, you wanna be in charge, and you wanna tell the very people who you have no clue about their business what they can and can't do. That to me is repulsive.”

Congresswoman Lisa McClain Says Anyone In Government Who Refuses To Answer Questions & Deflects, Needs To Be Replaced “I'm gonna share with the American people, if you get somebody who's in charge, especially in a government entity that can't answer a question, you should ask yourself, do we need to replace this person who can't answer a simple question? I mean, my goodness gracious. The disappointment that I have that you can't even answer a simple question is unbelievable. Yet, you wanna be in charge, and you wanna tell the very people who you have no clue about their business what they can and can't do. That to me is repulsive.”

Wall Street Apes

1,094,436 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Trump reshared this video and the following caption: "The Capitol Police beat the hell out of innocent J6 protesters, and the videos are finally coming out. The cops should be charged and the protesters should be freed." Let me ask you this: If you had people break into the foyer of your home shouting things that were threatening to you and your family, and you hit them with a stick, do you think you "should be charged" and the people who broke into your home "freed"? Would you say that the people breaking into your home were "innocent"? What if these people were pushing through the White House doors to get to Trump? If the answer is 'no,' then please be quiet.

Trump reshared this video and the following caption: "The Capitol Police beat the hell out of innocent J6 protesters, and the videos are finally coming out. The cops should be charged and the protesters should be freed." Let me ask you this: If you had people break into the foyer of your home shouting things that were threatening to you and your family, and you hit them with a stick, do you think you "should be charged" and the people who broke into your home "freed"? Would you say that the people breaking into your home were "innocent"? What if these people were pushing through the White House doors to get to Trump? If the answer is 'no,' then please be quiet.

Brian Krassenstein

1,160,073 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇵🇸 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 This man is yelling at Pro-Palestinian protesters, telling them they are "blind by hate", and that they are protesting because it is "fashionable", and has become "an excuse to hate Jews." While this may apply to some, it definitely does not apply to all who protest in support of the Palestinian cause. Many protesters in any protest will have extreme views and agendas, including Pro-Palestinian protesters promoting hatred, however this does not reflect ALL protesters. Most protesters are advocating for aid to civilians, the protection of the innocent, and improvements to the lives of Palestinians. These are noble causes to fight for. A Pro-Palestinian protester is not pro-Hamas. A Pro-Israeli protester is not anti-Palestinian.

🇵🇸 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 This man is yelling at Pro-Palestinian protesters, telling them they are "blind by hate", and that they are protesting because it is "fashionable", and has become "an excuse to hate Jews." While this may apply to some, it definitely does not apply to all who protest in support of the Palestinian cause. Many protesters in any protest will have extreme views and agendas, including Pro-Palestinian protesters promoting hatred, however this does not reflect ALL protesters. Most protesters are advocating for aid to civilians, the protection of the innocent, and improvements to the lives of Palestinians. These are noble causes to fight for. A Pro-Palestinian protester is not pro-Hamas. A Pro-Israeli protester is not anti-Palestinian.

Mario Nawfal

1,503,153 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Mamdani: I do not believe that is the question you must, in fact, answer in that booth. In the city I know, in the city I love, the question is not, “When did you arrive?” The question is, “Can you afford to stay?”

Mamdani: I do not believe that is the question you must, in fact, answer in that booth. In the city I know, in the city I love, the question is not, “When did you arrive?” The question is, “Can you afford to stay?”

Acyn

118,156 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sainsbury’s Protesters are blocking an isle that a disabled customer wants to go down. In today’s world .. I would have thought this would be classed as a disability hate crime from the protesters ? restricting his access ? The police are useless and so is Sainsbury’s

Sainsbury’s Protesters are blocking an isle that a disabled customer wants to go down. In today’s world .. I would have thought this would be classed as a disability hate crime from the protesters ? restricting his access ? The police are useless and so is Sainsbury’s

WeGotitBack 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇸

1,327,284 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Why do you need an AR-15?” Ask the police. Because they have them. They have the rifles. They have the 30-round magazines. They have the gear politicians keep saying is too dangerous for you. And nobody asks them why they need it. Why? Because the answer is obvious: They carry it to confront violent people. But here’s the part everyone skips… Who meets that violent person first? You do. The cop shows up after the threat starts. You’re the one already there. No badge. No backup. No radio. No team. And the Supreme Court has already said police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual. So if the state keeps these tools for the people who arrive second… Why does it want to take them from the person who has to survive first? That’s the question. Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still asks, “Why do you need that?”

“Why do you need an AR-15?” Ask the police. Because they have them. They have the rifles. They have the 30-round magazines. They have the gear politicians keep saying is too dangerous for you. And nobody asks them why they need it. Why? Because the answer is obvious: They carry it to confront violent people. But here’s the part everyone skips… Who meets that violent person first? You do. The cop shows up after the threat starts. You’re the one already there. No badge. No backup. No radio. No team. And the Supreme Court has already said police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual. So if the state keeps these tools for the people who arrive second… Why does it want to take them from the person who has to survive first? That’s the question. Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still asks, “Why do you need that?”

Colion Noir

147,377 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If a person lives in a tent but also has their own apartment, are they really homeless? I know countless people who technically have housing but choose to live on the streets. By definition, that does not make them homeless. Yet they still utilize homeless services. Due to poor tracking and weak verification within the social service system, most people are unaware this is happening. That raises an uncomfortable question: is this something the system fails to see—or something it would rather not know?

If a person lives in a tent but also has their own apartment, are they really homeless? I know countless people who technically have housing but choose to live on the streets. By definition, that does not make them homeless. Yet they still utilize homeless services. Due to poor tracking and weak verification within the social service system, most people are unaware this is happening. That raises an uncomfortable question: is this something the system fails to see—or something it would rather not know?

Kevin Dahlgren 🥾 🥾

29,074 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

116,060 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WHAT IS THE TRUTH Richard Heart? NOBODY WITH A FOLLOWING HAS THE BALLS TO TAG YOU AND ASK THE EXACT QUESTION THEY WANT TO KNOW............. I DO! I THINK THE BIG QUESTION PEOPLE HAVE, NOT ME, I COULD CARE LESS, BUT OTHERS WANT TO KNOW, THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH...... ARE THEY BEING BAD ACTORS ON #PULSECHAIN? IF YOU CAN NOT ANSWER WHY OR WHY NOT, I UNDERSTAND WHY........ THEY DON'T. LIKE AND RETWEET IF YOU ARE NOT A COWARD AND WANT THE ANSWER TO THIS ABOUT $PDAI IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION, FEEL FREE IN THE COMMENTS. EITHER WAY, I'M GOOD

WHAT IS THE TRUTH Richard Heart? NOBODY WITH A FOLLOWING HAS THE BALLS TO TAG YOU AND ASK THE EXACT QUESTION THEY WANT TO KNOW............. I DO! I THINK THE BIG QUESTION PEOPLE HAVE, NOT ME, I COULD CARE LESS, BUT OTHERS WANT TO KNOW, THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH...... ARE THEY BEING BAD ACTORS ON #PULSECHAIN? IF YOU CAN NOT ANSWER WHY OR WHY NOT, I UNDERSTAND WHY........ THEY DON'T. LIKE AND RETWEET IF YOU ARE NOT A COWARD AND WANT THE ANSWER TO THIS ABOUT $PDAI IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION, FEEL FREE IN THE COMMENTS. EITHER WAY, I'M GOOD

MOON KING B-ROOTS

25,821 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk: The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. “The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Why would people do that? Everyone's been trained in high school and college to answer the question. Convergent logic. You can't tell the professor your question is dumb, or you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So, everyone basically, without knowing it, got mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, 2021

Elon Musk: The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. “The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Why would people do that? Everyone's been trained in high school and college to answer the question. Convergent logic. You can't tell the professor your question is dumb, or you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So, everyone basically, without knowing it, got mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, 2021

ELON CLIPS

298,650 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

Eric Daugherty

1,428,739 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

157,862 просмотров • 12 дней назад

“if people don’t want to like you, for whatever reason, they’re gonna find any reason not to. it can be the easiest, dumbest, littlest thing. so, you know, the people that do like you and do support you and love you, those are the people to focus on, and that’s all that matters.” 🫂❤️‍🩹

“if people don’t want to like you, for whatever reason, they’re gonna find any reason not to. it can be the easiest, dumbest, littlest thing. so, you know, the people that do like you and do support you and love you, those are the people to focus on, and that’s all that matters.” 🫂❤️‍🩹

sabrina daily

91,673 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This network is important for small business. In this conversion, the president's going to dictate who gets to own it or maybe, you know, some committee. Why not let the seven million businesses that make their living, their families living, those are my Shark Tank people out there, why can't they own a piece of this? Why don't they get to invest in it? That would help the conversion period a lot, and it would make it truly the people's platform owned by the people, overseen by their Congress. That's how this deal should go down.

This network is important for small business. In this conversion, the president's going to dictate who gets to own it or maybe, you know, some committee. Why not let the seven million businesses that make their living, their families living, those are my Shark Tank people out there, why can't they own a piece of this? Why don't they get to invest in it? That would help the conversion period a lot, and it would make it truly the people's platform owned by the people, overseen by their Congress. That's how this deal should go down.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

19,424 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: Without realizing it, we've all got a mental straitjacket on. “Possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Why would people do that? Well, everyone's been trained in high school and college that you got to answer the question, convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb, you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically without knowing it, they got a mental straitjacket on. That is, they work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, July 30, 2021.

Elon Musk: Without realizing it, we've all got a mental straitjacket on. “Possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Why would people do that? Well, everyone's been trained in high school and college that you got to answer the question, convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb, you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically without knowing it, they got a mental straitjacket on. That is, they work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, July 30, 2021.

ELON CLIPS

20,676 просмотров • 1 месяц назад