Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

THIS FREELANCE EDITOR IS PULLING $17,900 A MONTH WHILE LITERALLY ASLEEP IN BED. Not by outsourcing to an expensive agency. Not by grinding 14-hour days on a timeline. Something entirely automated. He bypassed the traditional editing process by wiring Claude directly into Premiere Pro. Instead of manually scrubbing through...

15,368 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля unchosen.eth
unchosen.eth3 месяцев назад

this changes the editing completely

Фото профиля junkan
junkan3 месяцев назад

ai 完蛋了,天天这么多广告,说明销量很不好

Фото профиля veve
veve3 месяцев назад

Di kantor, AI malah bikin target naik, gaji tetep UMR doang.

Фото профиля Karina Bródka
Karina Bródka3 месяцев назад

Spot on as always

Фото профиля Victoria
Victoria2 месяцев назад

freelance editor pulling 17900 a month while asleep in bed is the kind of income story that sounds amazing until you check who profits from the strategy

Фото профиля PerkututNakal88
PerkututNakal883 месяцев назад

Claude

Фото профиля Omari
Omari3 месяцев назад

what's the secret to getting claire to do all the heavy lifting like that

Фото профиля Radar 24h
Radar 24h3 месяцев назад

Điều quan trọng là sản phẩm cuối cùng đúng không?

Фото профиля Dima T.
Dima T.3 месяцев назад

The real skill isn't editing faster. It's building a system that edits for you.

Фото профиля Great Minds
Great Minds3 месяцев назад

That's an interesting example of AI-powered editing workflow.

Фото профиля AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guide3 месяцев назад

Decoupling income from time is the real unlock here

Похожие видео

19 YEAR OLD IS RUNNING A YOUTUBE ANIMATION STUDIO FROM HIS BEDROOM. HE HAS NO ANIMATORS. HE CANNOT DRAW. HE IS PRINTING MONEY FROM CHILDREN'S RHYMES. Kids' YouTube channels routinely pull millions of views per video. The platform pays creators between $1,000 and $3,000 for every hundred thousand views in that niche. Before this year, getting a piece of that market required a 3D animation studio, voice actors, and a month of rendering. He does it in under three minutes. His entire studio is a GPT sol and a Claude window. He opens YouTube and finds the most popular nursery rhyme channels. He takes a screenshot of their video feed. He opens Claude. He has a custom tool called Higgsfield MCP connected directly to his chat. He pastes the screenshot. He writes one prompt. Analyze this YouTube channel and generate a week of original content in the exact same style and niche. He hits enter. A few minutes later, the chat window spits out a fully rendered, broadcast-ready 3D animation. A baby playing with blocks, perfectly lit, smoothly animated, and ready to be monetized. He uploads it to his channel. The next day, he does it again. The kids watching on their iPads don't know the video was generated by an AI analyzing a screenshot. The parents who just want five minutes of quiet don't care. The algorithm treats it like a Pixar short. A real animation studio spends $50,000 and two months to produce three minutes of content. He spends zero dollars, takes a screenshot, and goes to make coffee. While the rest of the internet argues about whether AI is a real job, a quiet group of teenagers is pulling market share from massive media companies with a single prompt. Most people will watch his tutorial and complain. A few will open a new tab.

zer

31,162 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A 22 YEAR OLD IS MAKING $50,000 A MONTH TRADING ON THE PLATFORM. HE DOES NOT READ CHARTS. HE DOES NOT FOLLOW THE NEWS. HE LETS AI MIRROR THE SMARTEST PEOPLE IN THE ROOM. his wallet: Most traders spend years learning technical analysis. They stare at screens for eight hours a day trying to find a microscopic edge in the market. He found a shortcut. He doesn't look at the assets. He looks at the leaderboards. Every morning, he opens the platform's public leaderboard. He scrolls through the names of traders who are making millions of dollars a week in pure profit. He copies the top 25 usernames. He doesn't try to guess what they are thinking. He drops all 25 profiles into Claude 3.5. He types one prompt: *"Analyze the current open positions of all these top traders. Tell me exactly which specific trades they are all agreeing on for today's events."* The AI scans the data and calculates the consensus. If the 25 smartest, most profitable accounts on the platform are all silently taking the exact same position on a specific event, the AI flags it. He doesn't question the logic. He doesn't do his own research. He just blindly executes the exact same trade from his phone. He is essentially crowdsourcing the intelligence of the platform's wealthiest operators and letting an AI filter out the noise. He rides their coattails on autopilot. Last month, he pulled $50,000 in net profit. His daily workflow takes exactly four minutes. The traditional finance world thinks you need an Ivy League degree and a Bloomberg terminal to run a hedge fund. The ghost economy realized you just need to know how to copy the smartest guys in the room and paste them into a prompt. Most people will watch his tutorial and say it's too risky. A few will open a new tab.

ZER

15,348 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

19 YEAR OLD IS RUNNING A YOUTUBE ANIMATION STUDIO FROM HIS BEDROOM. HE HAS NO ANIMATORS. HE CANNOT DRAW. HE IS PRINTING MONEY FROM CHILDREN'S RHYMES. Kids' YouTube channels routinely pull millions of views per video. The platform pays creators between $1,000 and $3,000 for every hundred thousand views in that niche. Before this year, getting a piece of that market required a 3D animation studio, voice actors, and a month of rendering. He does it in under three minutes. His entire studio is a GPT sol and a Claude window. He opens YouTube and finds the most popular nursery rhyme channels. He takes a screenshot of their video feed. He opens Claude. He has a custom tool called Higgsfield MCP connected directly to his chat. He pastes the screenshot. He writes one prompt. Analyze this YouTube channel and generate a week of original content in the exact same style and niche. He hits enter. A few minutes later, the chat window spits out a fully rendered, broadcast-ready 3D animation. A baby playing with blocks, perfectly lit, smoothly animated, and ready to be monetized. He uploads it to his channel. The next day, he does it again. The kids watching on their iPads don't know the video was generated by an AI analyzing a screenshot. The parents who just want five minutes of quiet don't care. The algorithm treats it like a Pixar short. A real animation studio spends $50,000 and two months to produce three minutes of content. He spends zero dollars, takes a screenshot, and goes to make coffee. While the rest of the internet argues about whether AI is a real job, a quiet group of teenagers is pulling market share from massive media companies with a single prompt. Most people will watch his tutorial and complain. A few will open a new tab. full breakdown in the article below Bookmark and follow for more.

Mayor.

58,297 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Francois Truffaut on Jean-Luc Godard: "Godard makes two or three movies a year, because he works like a painter. For him, what counts is not a single movie, but the work he has done during a certain artistic period. What I admire most in his films (although he can, if he wants to, show that he is visually one of the world’s best directors) is the beauty of his dialogues. He started making movies at the time when we all discovered Bergman, who liberated dialogue, that is, he showed us that the characters need only express what the director wants them to. There is no need to concern oneself with their psychology, or their social situation, or the plot. And Godard has secrets, you know, he never has a character go out a door and into the street. His characters go out a door, turn to the left, retrace their steps, and then go into the street. They put a cigarette into their mouth, take it out, put it back in, light it, and when it’s lit, throw it away. He is the only one who is able to express the instability of life. And he has also done away with the notion of characters who are likable or not likable, because in his films there are no feelings. Godard is certainly the most imitated director in the world, and people say, ‘He opened the doors,’ but I don’t think so. I think he opened the doors for him, just as it’s very dangerous to imitate Orson Welles by placing the camera on the ground. That’s O.K. for him but not for the rest of us." (Truffaut's interview with Sanche De Gramont, 1969) Clip from: Masculin Féminin (1966) Director: Jean-Luc Godard

DepressedBergman

143,754 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tom Hanks was handed the Oxford Union and 18 minutes. He refused to give a speech. He made the entire room say the same 8 words out loud instead, over and over, until people who had never acted in their lives were visibly doing it wrong in front of him. Is there something I can do for you. That is the whole lesson. And he tells them, standing there, that he has never taken an acting class in his life. He is running an exercise he only ever heard other people describe. The exercise has 1 rule. It is not the rule anybody guesses, and it is the only reason the thing works at all. Then he starts feeding the room circumstances. The first is harmless. By the 4th he is saying something into a microphone at Oxford that no publicist alive would have signed off on, and the room says the line anyway. They get it wrong once. He stops them and fixes it in 6 words. I did not expect the best moment of the night to be a correction. A drama student named NicholasDoucet says he took more out of these 18 minutes than out of his last 6 months of training. 351 people agreed with him. mccloysong caught the thing almost nobody catches the first time: the man is audibly unwell that night, he could have called it off, and he stood there and taught anyway. 568 likes. Around the 16 minute mark he stops the exercise completely, looks into the audience and says a name out loud. Then he asks the room not to go looking for her afterwards. Most people treat sincerity as a feeling that either arrives or does not. He treats it as a procedure, and a procedure can be rehearsed by anyone willing to sound stupid in front of a room for a while. 18 minutes. 8 words. 1 rule nobody guesses.

Stefan.

903,448 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In 1993 he was charging $5,000 per seminar seat and selling out arenas across America. By 2000 his company Robbins Research International had generated over $400 million in revenue. By 2023 his net worth had crossed $600 million and he was charging $1 million per private consulting day. Presidents and billionaires flew him in on private jets to fix one conversation. He built all of it on one skill. His name is Tony Robbins. And in the early 1990s he sat down in a training room and explained exactly how he does it. He opened with a number that most people in that room got completely backwards. 80% of being effective in front of any room is why you are there. 20% is how. Most speakers spend 100% of their preparation on the how. The words. The slides. The structure. The order. He said that is exactly why most people are forgettable the moment they stop talking. He said when he walks into a room he has zero internal dialogue. None. He is entirely focused outward on the people in front of him. The moment he starts talking to himself inside his head about whether it is going well — it stops going well. Every time. He ran the most effective direct response television show in the United States at the time. Outselling every competitor by three times. Not because of better production. Because of one framework he used in every single episode. First 40% of any presentation — get people to say me too. Not so what. Me too. You are not there to impress them. You are there to make them feel understood. Until that happens nothing else works. Next 10% — logic and reason. Just enough to let people justify the decision they have already emotionally made. Not more. Most speakers spend 80% of their time here and wonder why nothing lands. Next 40% — attack and confess. Say out loud every reason someone would not do what you are asking. Confess that you have been guilty of it too. The moment you name their resistance before they do you become the only person in the room they fully trust. Last 10% — solution and ask. By this point the ask is a formality. He said persuasion is a transference of emotion. You cannot transfer what you are not experiencing. If you are not genuinely moved by what you are saying the room will not be moved either. No technique fixes that gap. He also said something most people in that room heard as a throwaway line and almost nobody acted on. When two human beings meet the one who is most congruent will control the situation. Every time. Without exception. The tape runs just over an hour. Free on YouTube since the early 1990s. Almost nobody outside of professional speakers has watched it as a complete system.

Potato

63,999 просмотров • 1 месяц назад