Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This guy built a Monte Carlo pricing engine and it made $659 a day on Polymarket The result is already +$85,706 PnL in 130 days with only $35 per average trade, repeating the same setup 15 times every hour across BTC "Up or Down" markets Simulation, pricing and execution...

86,463 просмотров • 17 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Jamie Torres
Jamie Torres16 дней назад

Forget selling a $9 Notion template with "3 spots left" 😭 This is what actual leverage looks like. Building a system that runs in a continuous loop, executes 15 times an hour, and prints $659 a day. The market rewards execution, not fluff.

Фото профиля Akbar Shaik
Akbar Shaik16 дней назад

The architecture is what makes this interesting as an AI system. The Monte Carlo engine handles quantitative simulation, the agent layer can manage parameter selection and execution logic, and the feedback layer can continuously compare expected probability vs realized outcome.

Фото профиля VALIX
VALIX17 дней назад

Thanks for sharing. This guy has achieved an incredible return over 130 days

Фото профиля 0xSLEEPY
0xSLEEPY17 дней назад

有力气

Фото профиля Korens
Korens17 дней назад

Monte Carlo pricing on Polymarket is fascinating

Фото профиля Daniro
Daniro17 дней назад

Traders have to choose from a wide variety of mathematical models, but only a few are most suitable for building software

Фото профиля HeckyeaWin
HeckyeaWin16 дней назад

first step: be able to run next to their servers

Фото профиля ChilliJesus
ChilliJesus16 дней назад

890

Фото профиля Peter Roebel
Peter Roebel16 дней назад

@grok real or fake?

Фото профиля magsimich
magsimich16 дней назад

659 a day is pretty wild

Похожие видео

i built a 2 agent system using OpenClaw and Monte Carlo simulation > one agent predicts gold price > second agent bets on polymarket > second agent takes profit $1,400 → $17,900 in 72 hours saw a market on polymarket: "Will gold hit $3,000 by March 15?" price was sitting at 18¢ seemed random until i remembered Monte Carlo exists gave OpenClaw a task: "run 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations on gold price movement, calculate probability of hitting $3,000, pass results to trading agent" the architecture: > Agent 1 (Simulation Engine): - pulls historical gold volatility data - runs 10,000 price path simulations - factors in: Fed policy, geopolitical tension, USD strength - outputs: 73.4% probability gold hits $3,000 > Agent 2 (Trade Executor): > receives probability from Agent 1 > compares to polymarket odds (18¢ = 18% implied probability) > detects massive mispricing (73% vs 18%) > xecutes position hour 6: entered YES at 18¢ with $1,400 hour 24: gold jumps on Iran tensions, polymarket updates to 41¢ hour 48: Fed hints at rate cuts, simulation re-runs, now shows 81% probability hour 56: polymarket hits 67¢, Agent 2 adds to position hour 72: gold touches $2,987, market resolves YES at 94¢ final: $1,400 → $17,900 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞'𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬: polymarket prices are just crowd sentiment Monte Carlo is actual math > when math says 73% and crowd says 18% > that's not a trade > that's free money the simulation factored in: - 500+ historical gold price scenarios - current macro conditions - geopolitical risk premium - correlation with treasury yields ran this 4 more times on different markets: "Bitcoin above $70K by month end" - simulation: 62%, market: 31% → won "Unemployment rate above 4.2%" - simulation: 44%, market: 68% → bet NO, won "Tesla stock hits $250" - simulation: 28%, market: 52% → bet NO, won "Trump announces tariffs this week" - simulation can't model politics → skipped 7 trades total 6 wins 1 skip (non-quantifiable event) the edge is simple: most traders bet on vibes i'm betting on 10,000 simulated futures best polymarket traders use only tradefox: does anyone else realize polymarket is just mispriced probability distributions?

ZER

149,434 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

THIS WALLET STACKED $230K ON BTC UP/DOWN BETS. THE BLUEPRINT TO AUTOMATE THE SAME EDGE WITH CLAUDE The wallet is $230K all-time, every position a Bitcoin or Ethereum Up or Down market It never guesses direction. It enters only when the math and the market disagree THE STRATEGY: BTC moves are not fully random. When the market enters a committed directional state, continuation is measurable. That is Markov persistence Entry signal: > Δ = p̂ − q ≥ ε Model probability minus market price. Enter only on a 5% gap or more Persistence filter: > p(j*,j*) ≥ 0.87 Only trade states with 0.87 persistence or higher. Below that, skip. This is what holds the win rate above 65% with zero directional guessing Payout: > r = (1 − q) / q At q = 0.647 that is +54.5% a win. At q = 0.441, +126.7%. Lower entry price, bigger asymmetry Sizing: > f* = p − (1−p)/b Kelly. At p = 0.87, b = 0.647, f* ≈ 0.71. Size to the edge, never to gut HOW TO BUILD IT WITH CLAUDE: What separates this from a static bot: Claude reads its own trade journal every night and rewrites its own thresholds 1. Take an open-source Polymarket bot repo as your base logic. Feed it to Claude and have it migrate to CLOB v2: py_clob_client_v2, Safe wallet support, fee-aware evaluation 2. Hard-code the filters. Enter only when Δ ≥ 0.05 and p(j*,j*) ≥ 0.87. Apply Kelly on every fill. 3. Run DRY_RUN first. Log every signal, entry price, Markov state, and simulated P/L. No real money until the numbers hold for days 4. The nightly loop. Claude reads the journal, finds which persistence states actually won, adjusts MIN_PROB and MIN_EDGE, ships tomorrow's rules. The agent is sharper after 50 to 100 trades THE SETUP: Claude Opus as the brain. An open-source repo as the starting logic. A Polygon wallet with $50 to $100. Telegram for the morning report Start at $1 to $2 per trade while it learns. Scale only when the dry runs and the live fills line up 17,000 trades compound a thin edge into six figures. The model finds the edge. The nightly loop keeps it sharp Bookmark before you point a bot at your first window

Yarchi

22,966 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад