Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
This guy built an HFT bot on Polymarket with a $50 average trade size Result: +$220,792 His bot trades 5-minute BTC/ETH Up/Down markets using a hybrid of inventory rebalancing, dynamic hedging, and accumulating cheap complete sets: 1. It builds complete sets so that Up + Down costs less than... show more
87,974 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)
26 Kommentare

$50 trades turning into $220k, insane

Yeah, That’s the whole secret behind a small but consistent edge. He makes a small profit on a small trade size and repeats it many times. Over time, this turns into significant capital

Small edge, huge compounding

+$220K it's strong result rly

Yeah, thanks for your feedback

Tercera versión de este mismo bot HFT de esta cuenta con cifras distintas cada vez, termina en el mismo link para construir tu propio bot pagando. El patrón es el producto, no la estrategia.

+$220k on $50 trades is actually crazy when you realize most of it just comes from locking complete sets under a dollar over and over.

Yeah, that’s true, but a significant part of his edge also comes from building a directional skew

the $50 average is almost beside the point here. turnover, queue position, and time spent unhedged decide whether this survives.

Tell me more about this. I didn’t quite understand what you mean by “turnover”

All his hard work has paid off very much

Yeah, that’s true

I’ve heard that you can trade using strategies like these

That's very small and doable

What do you mean?

That's amazing! Seriously impressive stuff. Looks like a lot of

Thanks for your feedback. Glad you liked it

Wow.

Worth asking what the losing months looked like. Our own run: −31.9% vs −11.5%, lost to holding.

ngl that bot's got bigger gains than my ex

Inventory rebalancing plus complete-set accumulation is a smart combo for that market structure. Curious how the strategy holds up when book depth thins outside peak hours. We keep full L2 orderbook history for Polymarket if useful for that kind of stress test.

very useful bot

What I like most is his mathematical model and execution quality. That’s exactly what led to such an impressive ROI

Worth asking what the losing months looked like. Our own run: −31.9% vs −11.5%, lost to holding.

Fable?

I don’t know for sure, but it could definitely be Fable
