🚨 THIS GUY BUILT AN AI MARKETING TEAM WITH GROK 4.7 AND IT PULLED 20M+ VIEWS One post alone hit 7.5M views and brought in 3.3K new followers No agency. No content team. Just Grok 4.7 Bots with one job each: → Researcher finds viral formats in your niche... and explains why they work → Creative Director turns them into production-ready concepts → UGC Creator generates the visuals with the same AI avatar every time → Publisher connects to Postiz, writes the captions and fills the calendar And the Bots keep working on Grok's cloud computer while your laptop is closed He still picks the ideas and approves every post. AI just handles the repetitive stuff Full workflow + every prompt is in the article 👇show more

This is the real AI moat: not prompts, but a department that keeps shipping after you close the laptop.

Great job bro

Thought a lot about sharing or not

lo de que sigan trabajando con el portátil cerrado es lo que lo hace distinto a tenerlo abierto en una pestaña

el de investigar formatos que ya funcionan en tu nicho es el que más valor tiene de los cuatroç

same, research is the one i'd set up first if i only picked one

but relying solely on bots might lack the personal touch needed for engagement

me asombra lo fácil que es crear ahora estas cosas mientras yo estaba 4h diarias haciendo vídeos para sacar 10K$ al mes

me lo guardo que llevo meses con el calendario de contenido vacío por falta de tiempo

an empty calendar is exactly the problem this solves, give it a go

Do rejected concepts feed back into the research and concept agents, or does each run start fresh? That feedback loop may be more useful than adding another bot.

good catch, that loop isn't in the workflow yet. easiest version is a running doc of rejected concepts with one line on why, passed to the researcher as context each run

Building a specialized AI marketing team that generated 20 million views shows how powerful automated workflows can be. You and @mlkbfrey are the two accounts I enjoy following the most

lo importante es que él sigue eligiendo las ideas y aprobando, no es automático del todo

that's the whole point, taste stays human, the repetitive part doesn't

que publique los prompts enteros y no solo el resultado ya hace que el artículo valga la pena

me interesa sobre todo cómo conecta la parte de publicar, que es donde siempre se rompe todo

publishing is always where it breaks, the article covers that part properly

I'd want that Researcher bot starting from one number: views divided by followers on competitor accounts. A big multiple means the format is carrying the post, not the audience. I mine formats that way, then adapt mine to them. Explaining why it works comes second.

he still picks and approves everything, which is the detail most people will skip