正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

this guy built an ai-girl pipeline using real-time face filters, and d2c brands now pay him $2,000 per ugc video he got tired of watching brands burn $4,000 on a single creator who takes 2 weeks to deliver one angle, so he built a setup that runs photoreal ai... girls live from his own webcam, no actresses, no studios, no makeup artists his monthly revenue hit $89,000 last month from a network of 7 ai personas across tiktok and instagram. the average ugc creator caps at $6k juggling 4 brand deals the breakdown: > hardware is the moat, but most people butcher the setup in the first frame. face mesh locked at 60fps with zero artifacting > persona comes first, mess this up and nothing saves it: name, backstory, voice tone, niche before a single clip is shot > face selection is not random. you a/b test features (eye spacing, jawline, hair contrast) because some faces convert better in 9:16 > you're picking who your audience trusts, not who looks cool. that's targeting baked into bone structure > real-time physics run before the script, this is what kills the uncanny valley that destroys watch time in 2 seconds > the filter has to survive the strap of a tank top, the texture of a knit cardigan, the hair flick > batching is the move 96% skip: one performance, multiple personas, three platforms > the system pushes 12 pieces before lunch while brands test 2 creators a week and wonder why their cpa sits at $94 the economics: each video costs $4 in compute, sells for $1,500 to $3,000, takes 14 minutes to produce. that's a 37,500% margin, while ugc agencies pay creators $400-800 per clip and net $200 after revisions one supplement brand generated 14 variants with 7 personas in 4 hours and found a winner in 36 hours without flying a creator to la. they were paying $1,200 per ugc video and burning $6,000/week on content that didn't scale. now they spend $210 for 14 variants and their cpa dropped from $89 to $27 the avatars hold real products, warm window light on the persona, cold neon on the operator, mouth shapes sync to consonants not just vowels just a webcam, a tracked face, and the discipline to move enough that the filter never has a chance to breakshow more

Kiyoro

5,245 subscribers

31,137 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This guy got Claude to take control of Arcads and generate hyperrealistic UGC ads with a consistent AI actor, from a 7-word prompt, and now e-com brands pay him $1,500 per video to clone the setup. He got tired of watching DTC brands burn $4K on a photoshoot that dies the second a product angle changes, so he built a 2-prompt workflow that turns one product photo into scroll-stopping UGC without a single model, camera, or casting call. Here's the exact breakdown: → Claude is the director, Arcads is the studio. You never write a real prompt, you write one sentence → Type 7 words: "create a character sheet of a UGC actress on Arcads." Claude expands it into a 40-line spec: warm skin tone, high ponytail, gold hoops, white AirPods, athletic build, then takes control of Arcads itself → Arcads renders a 6-angle character sheet: front, back, profile, 3/4, two portraits, one consistent face locked across all of them → You download the grid and drop it back into Claude with one product photo → Second prompt, 8 words: "use Seedance 2.0 on Arcads to create natural UGC" → Claude writes the full shot list: timecodes, "1:03 AM clock zoom," the trackpad scroll, the arm pull that drags the product into frame, "delivery: casual, energetic," "ends on a wink + air kiss" → Arcads cuts the yellow Vans print onto an actor who was wearing all black in the grid. Real fabric folds, real light, zero warping → Final render: lip-sync locked to consonants, head not glued to the camera, a girl filming at 1am on her bed The key move 96% of people skip: you can't put the product on the actor before you lock the character sheet. If you drop a product photo onto a face that isn't locked across angles, the identity drifts frame to frame. The jaw resets. The skin tone shifts. The print slides off the fabric. The whole thing screams "AI" and your CTR dies in the first 2 seconds. His system locks the 6-view sheet first, so Arcads has one real human to dress, and the top lands with natural folds even though the grid never had it. One apparel brand ran 20 variants off a single product photo and found a winner in 36 hours, because the clips read like organic UGC, not a studio ad. Brands now pay him $1,500 per avatar build + $340/month to keep dropping fresh video batches on every new product. The entire thing runs on two prompts and one laptop. No photographer. No model agency. No product samples on set. Just two sentences, one product photo, and the discipline to lock the character before you render a single second of movement.

Shade

15,227 次观看 • 1 个月前

a tiktok account pulled 6.8M views, 312k followers, and $41,847. now brands are fighting to book her. she was built on a tuesday in 43 minutes. and no, this isn't another ai clip tool with a face on it. → before a single frame is made, the agent researches what's winning in skincare right now. then writes the script and generates the video. researched ads, not generated clips. → she's not a content play. she's a conversion engine that happens to look like a creator. → the system doesn't stitch, it strategizes. hooks, scripts, structure, tone, competitor research. think claude code, but for your entire ad pipeline. → every video that wins organically becomes the paid ad. $0 creator fees. 5.1x roas on first push. → one operator. one chat window. three personas. the brands hiring 6-person creator teams are being outperformed by someone who typed one direction and went to get coffee. comment skin for the workflow. (follow for dm) Try it here -

a tiktok account pulled 6.8M views, 312k followers, and $41,847. now brands are fighting to book her. she was built on a tuesday in 43 minutes. and no, this isn't another ai clip tool with a face on it. → before a single frame is made, the agent researches what's winning in skincare right now. then writes the script and generates the video. researched ads, not generated clips. → she's not a content play. she's a conversion engine that happens to look like a creator. → the system doesn't stitch, it strategizes. hooks, scripts, structure, tone, competitor research. think claude code, but for your entire ad pipeline. → every video that wins organically becomes the paid ad. $0 creator fees. 5.1x roas on first push. → one operator. one chat window. three personas. the brands hiring 6-person creator teams are being outperformed by someone who typed one direction and went to get coffee. comment skin for the workflow. (follow for dm) Try it here -

Vinay Jain

108,289 次观看 • 3 个月前

A 24-year-old launched a faceless YouTube channel 13 days ago. In the first month, he has already accumulated $4,000, but he has not shot a single frame.. His investment: a $20 subscription to Claude. No camera, no editor, no voice of his own. THE SYSTEM WORKS LIKE THIS: - Claude writes the full script from one topic prompt - an AI voice narrates it - an AI tool generates the animation and the visuals - one template, repeated forever: "the economics of owning an airport" / "…a private jet" / "…a hospital" - it publishes on a schedule while he sleeps The first 12 days, from zero: > "Why a Fan Can Kill You" -> 272,000 views > second video -> 136,000 views in 6 days > subscribers -> 4,300 > month-one pace -> ~$4,000 And it's replicable. One of his students launched "Mr. Finance" on the same template 13 days ago: > 10,800 subscribers > finance-niche RPM -> ~$7 per 1,000 views > one video on the economics of shopping malls -> $500+ on its own He didn't become a creator. He built a press that prints episodes. The whole stack is public. Everyone has the same $20 Claude. He just pointed it at a niche and refused to stop publishing.

A 24-year-old launched a faceless YouTube channel 13 days ago. In the first month, he has already accumulated $4,000, but he has not shot a single frame.. His investment: a $20 subscription to Claude. No camera, no editor, no voice of his own. THE SYSTEM WORKS LIKE THIS: - Claude writes the full script from one topic prompt - an AI voice narrates it - an AI tool generates the animation and the visuals - one template, repeated forever: "the economics of owning an airport" / "…a private jet" / "…a hospital" - it publishes on a schedule while he sleeps The first 12 days, from zero: > "Why a Fan Can Kill You" -> 272,000 views > second video -> 136,000 views in 6 days > subscribers -> 4,300 > month-one pace -> ~$4,000 And it's replicable. One of his students launched "Mr. Finance" on the same template 13 days ago: > 10,800 subscribers > finance-niche RPM -> ~$7 per 1,000 views > one video on the economics of shopping malls -> $500+ on its own He didn't become a creator. He built a press that prints episodes. The whole stack is public. Everyone has the same $20 Claude. He just pointed it at a niche and refused to stop publishing.

Ridark

141,495 次观看 • 12 天前

the real UGC industry isn't dying, it already died created this AI UGC in just a few minutes using my brand new system, from first prompt to final video > product stays in frame exactly where it should > few different people in same one video > can be adapted to any script, character, and environment > voice sounds like a real person, not a robot reading a script > movements are smooth and controlable in every shot > no time limit - make it as long as you need with this level of AI UGC, you can create and test 50x more ads than with real creators while saving $300-$500+ per video

MAX

18,229 次观看 • 3 个月前

I just swapped a UGC creator with an AI character in under 10 minutes 🤯 Same video. Same expressions. Same lip sync. Completely different face. This workflow is perfect for DTC brands & agencies who want to test multiple creator variations without filming anyone new. Here's the use case: You've got a UGC video that's printing money. The script converts. The pacing is dialed. The energy is right. But you want to test different faces—different ages, demographics, vibes—to see what actually drives the highest CTR. The old way: → Hire 5 new creators → Brief each one → Pray they match the original energy → Pay $500+ per video → Wait 2-3 weeks The AI way: → Take your original UGC video → Generate an AI character with Nano Banana → Run both through FAL AI's Wan Animate → AI swaps the face while keeping every expression & movement → Done in minutes The motion tracking is ridiculous. Every smile. Every head tilt. Every hand movement. Perfectly mapped onto the new face. What this unlocks: → One winning script, 5 different creator looks → A/B test demographics without reshooting → Localize ads for different markets instantly → Refresh fatigued creative with a new face I recorded a full step-by-step Loom showing exactly how to do this. Want the tutorial? -> Comment "FACE" -> Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM) (Please use responsibly 😂)

I just swapped a UGC creator with an AI character in under 10 minutes 🤯 Same video. Same expressions. Same lip sync. Completely different face. This workflow is perfect for DTC brands & agencies who want to test multiple creator variations without filming anyone new. Here's the use case: You've got a UGC video that's printing money. The script converts. The pacing is dialed. The energy is right. But you want to test different faces—different ages, demographics, vibes—to see what actually drives the highest CTR. The old way: → Hire 5 new creators → Brief each one → Pray they match the original energy → Pay $500+ per video → Wait 2-3 weeks The AI way: → Take your original UGC video → Generate an AI character with Nano Banana → Run both through FAL AI's Wan Animate → AI swaps the face while keeping every expression & movement → Done in minutes The motion tracking is ridiculous. Every smile. Every head tilt. Every hand movement. Perfectly mapped onto the new face. What this unlocks: → One winning script, 5 different creator looks → A/B test demographics without reshooting → Localize ads for different markets instantly → Refresh fatigued creative with a new face I recorded a full step-by-step Loom showing exactly how to do this. Want the tutorial? -> Comment "FACE" -> Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM) (Please use responsibly 😂)

Mike Futia

38,776 次观看 • 7 个月前

ChatGPT Images 2.0 + Seedance 2.0 is f*cking wild 🤯 I generated this 25-second UGC ad for Barebells in under 20 minutes: creator, script, scenes, finished cut. ChatGPT Images 2.0 generates the creator. Seedance 2.0 turns it into video. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who want to test 20 UGC angles before paying $2K per creator video. If you're briefing creator agencies every week, waiting 7-10 days for one take of one variation, and paying $150–$300+ per UGC video that still misses the brand vibe... This workflow eliminates the entire loop: → Generate your creator in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → Save her as a Character Element in Seedance so her face stays locked across every scene → Save your product as a Prop Element with brand-accurate wrapper details → Write a 3-scene script in real UGC dialogue cadence → Fire each scene to Seedance 2.0 with both elements selected → Stitch in CapCut with auto-captions, no music, hard cuts only No creator briefs. No 7-day turnarounds. No $200/video platform fees. What you get: → A finished UGC ad in your brand's voice → Infinite variations of the same concept (test 10 hooks against one product in an afternoon) → A reusable creator and product Element library that scales across every ad → A repeatable workflow your team can run in 15-30 minutes I put together a full playbook with the 5-step system, every prompt template, the Seedance scene structure, and every common failure mode and how to fix it. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

40,143 次观看 • 3 个月前

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

winkle.

21,373 次观看 • 1 个月前

21 videos per week. 150,000 views daily. $3,000-$10,000 a month YouTube's algorithm does not reward the most creative creators. It rewards the ones who publish 4 times a week without breaking down. One video takes a full day. Description alone is 45 minutes. Multiply that by 4 uploads per week and the math breaks you. Most channels pay not because the content is weak but because the creator runs out of bandwidth. Claude solves the production bottleneck directly. Feed it your raw idea and speaking points. A tech channel publishing twice per week earns around $300 monthly at 50,000 views. The same creator using Claude to publish before a single sponsorship lands. The content does not get worse. YouTube interprets that as authority and pushes the channel harder.

21 videos per week. 150,000 views daily. $3,000-$10,000 a month YouTube's algorithm does not reward the most creative creators. It rewards the ones who publish 4 times a week without breaking down. One video takes a full day. Description alone is 45 minutes. Multiply that by 4 uploads per week and the math breaks you. Most channels pay not because the content is weak but because the creator runs out of bandwidth. Claude solves the production bottleneck directly. Feed it your raw idea and speaking points. A tech channel publishing twice per week earns around $300 monthly at 50,000 views. The same creator using Claude to publish before a single sponsorship lands. The content does not get worse. YouTube interprets that as authority and pushes the channel harder.

Lummox

19,666 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Cowork + Seedance 2.0 is f*cking wild 🤯 I built a skill inside Claude Cowork that generates UGC video ads on demand using Seedance 2.0, the best AI video model. One product image + one prompt = a full UGC ad with multiple shots, dialogue, and on-brand pacing. All inside Claude Cowork. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need UGC creative at volume without hiring creators or paying per-video SaaS fees. If you're briefing creators every week, waiting days for footage, paying $150–$300 per UGC video, and still getting ads that miss the brand vibe... This skill eliminates the entire loop: → Drop a product image into Claude Cowork → Tell it the ad angle (unboxing, review, lifestyle, demo) → Claude writes the dialogue, shot list, and pacing → Fires it to Seedance 2.0 via FAL AI API → Downloads finished clips into organized folders → Stitches multiple shots into one finished ad No creator briefs. No waiting for footage. No $200/video platform fees. What you get: → UGC video ads generated in minutes, not days → Full control over dialogue, pacing, and shot composition → Your product photos as reference so Seedance matches your real packaging → A reusable skill: new product, new folder, same pipeline Built 100% in Claude Cowork with the Seedance 2.0 API. I put together a full playbook with the Claude Cowork skill file, the exact prompts, and the FAL AI setup to get this running yourself. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

79,830 次观看 • 3 个月前

this Adaptive AI agent tells brands exactly what tiktok content is going viral in their niche before they brief a single creator here's how brands are running campaigns that actually convert on Content Rewards: -> drop your niche hashtag in and it scans TikTok for the highest performing content right now -> filters by view velocity, engagement rate, and watch time -> identifies the exact hooks, formats, and topics driving views in your market -> maps out the patterns every viral video in your niche shares -> generates a full content brief your creators can execute immediately -> launch it as a clipping campaign on content rewards and scale with hundreds of creators -> tracks what's working and updates the brief as trends shift -> every step from trend research to live campaign is automated what used to cost a full agency retainer now runs on autopilot. reply "AGENT" + RT and i'll send you the full breakdown so you can launch your first data-driven creator campaign this week (must be following)

this Adaptive AI agent tells brands exactly what tiktok content is going viral in their niche before they brief a single creator here's how brands are running campaigns that actually convert on Content Rewards: -> drop your niche hashtag in and it scans TikTok for the highest performing content right now -> filters by view velocity, engagement rate, and watch time -> identifies the exact hooks, formats, and topics driving views in your market -> maps out the patterns every viral video in your niche shares -> generates a full content brief your creators can execute immediately -> launch it as a clipping campaign on content rewards and scale with hundreds of creators -> tracks what's working and updates the brief as trends shift -> every step from trend research to live campaign is automated what used to cost a full agency retainer now runs on autopilot. reply "AGENT" + RT and i'll send you the full breakdown so you can launch your first data-driven creator campaign this week (must be following)

adam

332,221 次观看 • 3 个月前

RIP Arcads 🤯 I built a Claude skill that vibe-codes UGC ads on demand. One product + one prompt = the AI creator, the script, the scene-by-scene shot list, and finished video. All inside Claude. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who can't afford to keep paying $500-$1,500 per UGC video and waiting 2 weeks for revisions. If you're briefing creators, mailing PR boxes, waiting on first cuts, then asking for re-shoots because the hook didn't land... This skill eliminates the entire loop: → Tell Claude the product, ad angle, and length → Skill writes the GPT Image 2.0 prompt to generate the AI creator from scratch → Skill writes every scene prompt, dialogue line, and delivery direction → Pipe it into Seedance 2.0 with character + product + voice locked → Speed up + caption in CapCut → Ship the ad in 20 minutes No more paying $11 per video on Arcads. What you get: → Perfect character consistency across every scene → Voice consistency that holds clip-to-clip (small CapCut hack inside the tutorial) → Real product fidelity using your actual product photo as a reference → Multi-scene day-in-life, testimonial, and action-shot formats out of the box Built 100% with a Claude skill + Seedance 2.0. I recorded a full step-by-step tutorial showing the exact workflow + the 3 finished AI UGC ads I made for Rhode, AG1, and Barebells. Want to see the full breakdown? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

RIP Arcads 🤯 I built a Claude skill that vibe-codes UGC ads on demand. One product + one prompt = the AI creator, the script, the scene-by-scene shot list, and finished video. All inside Claude. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who can't afford to keep paying $500-$1,500 per UGC video and waiting 2 weeks for revisions. If you're briefing creators, mailing PR boxes, waiting on first cuts, then asking for re-shoots because the hook didn't land... This skill eliminates the entire loop: → Tell Claude the product, ad angle, and length → Skill writes the GPT Image 2.0 prompt to generate the AI creator from scratch → Skill writes every scene prompt, dialogue line, and delivery direction → Pipe it into Seedance 2.0 with character + product + voice locked → Speed up + caption in CapCut → Ship the ad in 20 minutes No more paying $11 per video on Arcads. What you get: → Perfect character consistency across every scene → Voice consistency that holds clip-to-clip (small CapCut hack inside the tutorial) → Real product fidelity using your actual product photo as a reference → Multi-scene day-in-life, testimonial, and action-shot formats out of the box Built 100% with a Claude skill + Seedance 2.0. I recorded a full step-by-step tutorial showing the exact workflow + the 3 finished AI UGC ads I made for Rhode, AG1, and Barebells. Want to see the full breakdown? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

34,133 次观看 • 3 个月前

A guy makes $100K a month putting people to sleep with AI The whole channel is fake. No host, no narrator, nothing real. His name is Leo. He picked a weirdly powerful niche, history stories for people who want to fall asleep. The channel is called Sleepless Historian and it ships boring medieval history videos that are 30 minutes to 3 hours long. People put it on at night, drift off, and the watch time goes through the roof. The whole pipeline runs on AI tools stacked together. He generates the script with ChatGPT and a tool called Subscribr that writes full 60+ minute narrations on autopilot. The voiceover is done in ElevenLabs with a calm British narrator voice. The visuals are generated in medieval scenes that loop quietly under the audio. Everything gets stitched together in CapCut with ambient sound effects from Artlist. One video took him a few hours. The channel hit 887K subscribers and pulls around $100K a month from YouTube ad revenue alone. And he's doing the same play across multiple niches at once. One viral video on another of his channels has already done 2.9M views and 50.7M impressions. You don't need a face, a voice, or even an idea of your own. You just need the stack and a niche the algorithm is hungry for.

A guy makes $100K a month putting people to sleep with AI The whole channel is fake. No host, no narrator, nothing real. His name is Leo. He picked a weirdly powerful niche, history stories for people who want to fall asleep. The channel is called Sleepless Historian and it ships boring medieval history videos that are 30 minutes to 3 hours long. People put it on at night, drift off, and the watch time goes through the roof. The whole pipeline runs on AI tools stacked together. He generates the script with ChatGPT and a tool called Subscribr that writes full 60+ minute narrations on autopilot. The voiceover is done in ElevenLabs with a calm British narrator voice. The visuals are generated in medieval scenes that loop quietly under the audio. Everything gets stitched together in CapCut with ambient sound effects from Artlist. One video took him a few hours. The channel hit 887K subscribers and pulls around $100K a month from YouTube ad revenue alone. And he's doing the same play across multiple niches at once. One viral video on another of his channels has already done 2.9M views and 50.7M impressions. You don't need a face, a voice, or even an idea of your own. You just need the stack and a niche the algorithm is hungry for.

winkle.

88,185 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sora 2 just changed the game for UGC-style ads 🤯 I've been testing it the past 48 hours on real DTC brands. And the results are honestly insane. Perfect for e-commerce brands & ad agencies who want to test new creatives quickly. But instead of spending $500+ per UGC video to test a new hook or angle... Just use Sora 2 and iterate on unlimited variations for pennies per video. Here's what makes this so good: → Test 10 different hooks in the time it takes to book one creator → Iterate on new angles without touching your creative budget → Generate product-in-hand shots with solid brand consistency → Create variations across different settings instantly → Go from concept to testable ad in under 5 minutes → Scale winners without reshooting anything I recorded a 9-minute Loom video breaking down my entire process, including the prompts. Want access? —> Like + bookmark this post —> Comment "SORA" And I'll send it right over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

105,677 次观看 • 10 个月前

recreated this exact hook with AI in 3 minutes generated first frame with nano banana -> uploaded it along with reference video to Kling motion control, done when the quality is actually there, AI UGC beats real creators every time we built the best system for this right now: - realistic visuals - realistic voice - realistic movement - all optimized for virality and conversions way cheaper than a real creator and built for scale across thousands of posts and multiple accounts this isn't generic AI slop, these are high quality systems built with real effort and ready to scale your business it works across ecom,apps, saas, coaching, DTC... everything yet people are still paying $300-500 per UGC video from creators who ghost halfway through the project

recreated this exact hook with AI in 3 minutes generated first frame with nano banana -> uploaded it along with reference video to Kling motion control, done when the quality is actually there, AI UGC beats real creators every time we built the best system for this right now: - realistic visuals - realistic voice - realistic movement - all optimized for virality and conversions way cheaper than a real creator and built for scale across thousands of posts and multiple accounts this isn't generic AI slop, these are high quality systems built with real effort and ready to scale your business it works across ecom,apps, saas, coaching, DTC... everything yet people are still paying $300-500 per UGC video from creators who ghost halfway through the project

MAX

171,662 次观看 • 5 个月前

The $1B one-man company the The New York Times just profiled runs a system that got him to 833x growth. 300 users → 250,000. In 12 months. Everyone read the article and picked a side: “It’s fraud.” “It’s genius.” “It should be illegal.” I read it and saw a blueprint. Not the fake doctors. Not the AI-generated faces. Not the testimonials from people who don’t exist. I saw the layer underneath. A production system that turns one brief into hundreds of ad variants — no creative team, no studio, no media agency. One input. Hundreds of outputs. All running at once. That’s not marketing. That’s on-demand ad infrastructure. And it comes down to 5 steps. Step 1 is the architecture decision most brands skip because it doesn’t feel like “marketing.” Get it right → the other 4 become completely mechanical. That’s why he runs 800 ads while most brands struggle to ship 20 a week. Comment “Notch” and I’ll send you the full 5-step breakdown.

The $1B one-man company the The New York Times just profiled runs a system that got him to 833x growth. 300 users → 250,000. In 12 months. Everyone read the article and picked a side: “It’s fraud.” “It’s genius.” “It should be illegal.” I read it and saw a blueprint. Not the fake doctors. Not the AI-generated faces. Not the testimonials from people who don’t exist. I saw the layer underneath. A production system that turns one brief into hundreds of ad variants — no creative team, no studio, no media agency. One input. Hundreds of outputs. All running at once. That’s not marketing. That’s on-demand ad infrastructure. And it comes down to 5 steps. Step 1 is the architecture decision most brands skip because it doesn’t feel like “marketing.” Get it right → the other 4 become completely mechanical. That’s why he runs 800 ads while most brands struggle to ship 20 a week. Comment “Notch” and I’ll send you the full 5-step breakdown.

Vinay Jain

20,786 次观看 • 4 个月前

UGC creators are so cooked. 🧑‍🍳 Imagine charging $300 per video when ecomm brands & agencies can automate this at scale now with AI. This n8n + Sora 2 API system generates unlimited UGC for a few bucks each. HD quality. No watermarks. Full commercial rights. And this is the WORST the quality will be. Yeah, the days of spending $10k+/month on influencer content, waiting weeks for deliverables, chasing revisions, and managing contracts are coming to end. This n8n automation flips the entire model: → Drop in a single product photo → Add your creative brief + set video length → Sora 2 API generates HD UGC instantly → Unboxings, demos, lifestyle shots, product showcases → Ready to publish—no edits needed What you're not dealing with: - No watermarks - No usage rights negotiations - No revision rounds - No waiting 2 weeks for one video One n8n workflow. Unlimited content. Pennies per video. Built 100% in n8n. This is the future of UGC marketing for Shopify brands & creative agencies. It's coming, whether you're ready or not. Want the full workflow? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

UGC creators are so cooked. 🧑‍🍳 Imagine charging $300 per video when ecomm brands & agencies can automate this at scale now with AI. This n8n + Sora 2 API system generates unlimited UGC for a few bucks each. HD quality. No watermarks. Full commercial rights. And this is the WORST the quality will be. Yeah, the days of spending $10k+/month on influencer content, waiting weeks for deliverables, chasing revisions, and managing contracts are coming to end. This n8n automation flips the entire model: → Drop in a single product photo → Add your creative brief + set video length → Sora 2 API generates HD UGC instantly → Unboxings, demos, lifestyle shots, product showcases → Ready to publish—no edits needed What you're not dealing with: - No watermarks - No usage rights negotiations - No revision rounds - No waiting 2 weeks for one video One n8n workflow. Unlimited content. Pennies per video. Built 100% in n8n. This is the future of UGC marketing for Shopify brands & creative agencies. It's coming, whether you're ready or not. Want the full workflow? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

18,196 次观看 • 7 个月前

Scroll through your X rn and you’ll see half the viral videos on your tl are AI creators are using a mix, Veo, Kling, Runway, but Seedance 2.0 on Higgs is by far the closest anything has come to looking like real cinematography. and the money behind this is not small: • AI UGC creators charging $1K per video, pulling $5-10K/month from brands • sponsored posts on X paying $1k-5K depending on niche • one viral AI video = inbound DMs from agencies, product partnerships, ad deals • X’s 2026 creator pool literally doubled, top accounts clearing $3K/quarter on ad rev alone, before brand deals the wild part? most of these creators started 3-4 months ago with zero film background. the tools are right there! the only question is if you'll bet on yourself enough to make the videos and hit post.

Elena🌸

11,833 次观看 • 3 个月前

Someone is going to make $5,000/month from a woman who doesn’t exist. And it’s probably going to happen from AI podcast clips. There’s a new wave of fake Instagram influencers getting millions of views on Reels right now: fake face fake voice fake podcast setup real attention The play is simple: Use ChatGPT to write 60-second motivational rants for a specific audience. Example: “girls 18–25 who feel behind in life” Then generate one AI character, put her in a podcast setup, paste the script into an AI video tool, and turn it into endless short clips with Kling 3.0. No studio. No filming. No creator. No personal brand. Just a fake person saying exactly what a real audience wants to hear at 1am. The money comes later: > affiliate links > paid shoutouts > digital products > newsletter funnels > coaching offers That’s why this is scary. AI influencers don’t need talent. They need a face, a niche, and distribution.

0xTria

11,845 次观看 • 1 个月前

THIS GUY IS WALKING INTO LOCAL SHOPS WITH A MAC MINI IN A HARD CASE AND WALKING OUT WITH $1,200 CHECKS FOR INSTALLING AI THAT RUNS WITHOUT THE INTERNET I had to rewatch this twice because the business model is so stupidly simple my brain kept looking for the catch. He shows up. Plugs in a Mac Mini. Installs a private AI network running entirely on Ollama. The whole thing is done in under an hour. Zero cloud dependency. No API bills. No monthly charges bleeding the client dry. The shop owner gets a local AI system that works even if the WiFi dies, and this guy walks out with $1,200 for an installation that takes less time than a long lunch. The hardware costs $1,300. One deployment and the machine is paid for. Then he locks in a $149 monthly retainer for support, which means every client after the first is pure margin stacking on top of recurring revenue that compounds every single month. Most people hear "AI business" and think they need to build a SaaS platform or learn to code or raise funding from someone. This guy skipped all of that and went straight to walking into physical stores with a box under his arm. This is not going to scale to a billion dollar company. Obviously. But a solo operator clearing $5-10K a month from local installs while everyone else is still arguing about which LLM is best on Twitter is the kind of quiet hustle that does not make headlines until someone does a breakdown of their year-end numbers. The surface area of what AI can do right now is expanding faster than anyone can map it. One guy is doing local hardware installs. Another is generating AI personas that pull five figures a month. Someone else is running AI video pipelines off a laptop. Same wave of tools. None of them competing with each other. Hit play. Watch him unbox the setup and walk through the numbers. Then tell me you could not do this in your city by next Friday.

THIS GUY IS WALKING INTO LOCAL SHOPS WITH A MAC MINI IN A HARD CASE AND WALKING OUT WITH $1,200 CHECKS FOR INSTALLING AI THAT RUNS WITHOUT THE INTERNET I had to rewatch this twice because the business model is so stupidly simple my brain kept looking for the catch. He shows up. Plugs in a Mac Mini. Installs a private AI network running entirely on Ollama. The whole thing is done in under an hour. Zero cloud dependency. No API bills. No monthly charges bleeding the client dry. The shop owner gets a local AI system that works even if the WiFi dies, and this guy walks out with $1,200 for an installation that takes less time than a long lunch. The hardware costs $1,300. One deployment and the machine is paid for. Then he locks in a $149 monthly retainer for support, which means every client after the first is pure margin stacking on top of recurring revenue that compounds every single month. Most people hear "AI business" and think they need to build a SaaS platform or learn to code or raise funding from someone. This guy skipped all of that and went straight to walking into physical stores with a box under his arm. This is not going to scale to a billion dollar company. Obviously. But a solo operator clearing $5-10K a month from local installs while everyone else is still arguing about which LLM is best on Twitter is the kind of quiet hustle that does not make headlines until someone does a breakdown of their year-end numbers. The surface area of what AI can do right now is expanding faster than anyone can map it. One guy is doing local hardware installs. Another is generating AI personas that pull five figures a month. Someone else is running AI video pipelines off a laptop. Same wave of tools. None of them competing with each other. Hit play. Watch him unbox the setup and walk through the numbers. Then tell me you could not do this in your city by next Friday.

Framez

924,854 次观看 • 6 天前