Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This guy either had too much Harley Davidson for himself or too many beers or both. Looked like he was just going to drive out in the street in front of that truck. Not sure why he revved the engine up to back it up but it didn’t help....

TheEXECUTlONER_'s profile picture

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

301,447 subscribers

526,731 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

KomediSağlık & İyilikOtomobil & Araçlar
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This man called this lawn service company to mow his yard front and back and weed eat it. Looks like the yard hasn’t been mowed or maintained in quite awhile. 💯 The lawn service guy quotes him $200. The man doesn’t seem pleased and thinks that’s high. 🤯 The lawn service guy tells him to maybe call around and see if he can get a cheaper quote. Not sure what rate that man was expecting. Do you think $200 is too high for all that? So you think it is too low for that? What do you think is a fair price would be?
1:49

This man called this lawn service company to mow his yard front and back and weed eat it. Looks like the yard hasn’t been mowed or maintained in quite awhile. 💯 The lawn service guy quotes him $200. The man doesn’t seem pleased and thinks that’s high. 🤯 The lawn service guy tells him to maybe call around and see if he can get a cheaper quote. Not sure what rate that man was expecting. Do you think $200 is too high for all that? So you think it is too low for that? What do you think is a fair price would be?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

265,203 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

In Top Gun, John Travolta was the first choice for Maverick but was too expensive. Tom Cruise initially turned it down too. Producers had to take him up on an F-14 and flip him and do all kinds of stunts to turn him around and make sure he never got back in a cockpit. But it was just the opposite. He landed and he walked over to a phone booth and called the producer and said, “Jerry. I’m making the movie. I love it.’
1:38

In Top Gun, John Travolta was the first choice for Maverick but was too expensive. Tom Cruise initially turned it down too. Producers had to take him up on an F-14 and flip him and do all kinds of stunts to turn him around and make sure he never got back in a cockpit. But it was just the opposite. He landed and he walked over to a phone booth and called the producer and said, “Jerry. I’m making the movie. I love it.’

Emir Han

1,327,747 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Ira Winderman on Tyler Herro: “Guys, doesn’t Tyler Herro have the kind of face that makes you want to punch him in the face? Doesn’t he just have that kind of look? He’s that kind of guy. He’s the instigator in high school who is always doing the little digs until it becomes too much. But this time, he put it out world wide on social media instead. I don’t what to say he had what was coming to him, but it sorta was. You do something like that, there’s going to be push back.” (Via 104.3 WQAM)
1:08

Ira Winderman on Tyler Herro: “Guys, doesn’t Tyler Herro have the kind of face that makes you want to punch him in the face? Doesn’t he just have that kind of look? He’s that kind of guy. He’s the instigator in high school who is always doing the little digs until it becomes too much. But this time, he put it out world wide on social media instead. I don’t what to say he had what was coming to him, but it sorta was. You do something like that, there’s going to be push back.” (Via 104.3 WQAM)

Heat Central

187,985 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

He just wants to get out of the pool… but she’s not letting him 😅 Seems she likes the view a little too much. Is it just curiosity… or something more?
1:38

He just wants to get out of the pool… but she’s not letting him 😅 Seems she likes the view a little too much. Is it just curiosity… or something more?

Mario, PT

57,172 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Just a typical day at target getting the necessities… A fellow customer offers to put a heavy case of water in this woman’s cart. An act of kindness rarely seen anymore. But the kicker is she’s with her husband who DIDN’T even bother to help her. This guy absolutely emasculates her man in front of his wife asking why he didn’t offer. I don’t know, I respect that guy who was trying to help but he may have gone too far. Or maybe he learned how to be a man that day!?🤷‍♀️
1:13

Just a typical day at target getting the necessities… A fellow customer offers to put a heavy case of water in this woman’s cart. An act of kindness rarely seen anymore. But the kicker is she’s with her husband who DIDN’T even bother to help her. This guy absolutely emasculates her man in front of his wife asking why he didn’t offer. I don’t know, I respect that guy who was trying to help but he may have gone too far. Or maybe he learned how to be a man that day!?🤷‍♀️

AmyLouWho

38,761 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Sam Altman: “This is probably the best time (maybe ever) to be starting your career” When asked how startup founders should handle a failed venture or pivot, Sam responds: “First of all, I think this is probably the best time — maybe ever — to be starting out your career because you will get to surf the greatest technological wave, maybe ever. And what that means is you can change course many times because you will have this unbelievable tailwind.” He advises founders to not get too hung up on any particular setback or failure — or even just changing your mind if you find something more exciting to go after: “I think this is going to be an unusual time in how much it rewards adaptability and decisive and quick movement. And I would trust that… And not get hung up on the fact that you decided to pivot or something didn’t work because you are just going to be flooded with opportunities for the next few years.” He concludes: “It’s still hard. It still always feels like a setback. But take the time you need to go on vacation, go for a hike, or just stew over it for a little while. But when you get back up, get back up with vigor.” Video source: Harvard Business School (2024)
1:06

Sam Altman: “This is probably the best time (maybe ever) to be starting your career” When asked how startup founders should handle a failed venture or pivot, Sam responds: “First of all, I think this is probably the best time — maybe ever — to be starting out your career because you will get to surf the greatest technological wave, maybe ever. And what that means is you can change course many times because you will have this unbelievable tailwind.” He advises founders to not get too hung up on any particular setback or failure — or even just changing your mind if you find something more exciting to go after: “I think this is going to be an unusual time in how much it rewards adaptability and decisive and quick movement. And I would trust that… And not get hung up on the fact that you decided to pivot or something didn’t work because you are just going to be flooded with opportunities for the next few years.” He concludes: “It’s still hard. It still always feels like a setback. But take the time you need to go on vacation, go for a hike, or just stew over it for a little while. But when you get back up, get back up with vigor.” Video source: Harvard Business School (2024)

Startup Archive

69,167 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

He was just running a normal errand… pulling into the parking lot of Lowe’s when something caught his eye. A truck. Loud sign. “20 RIBEYES FOR $39.99.” That’s not a deal. That’s a shock. He paused. Looked again. Did the math in his head. This didn’t make sense. Ribeyes don’t cost that little. Ever. But curiosity got the better of him… and that’s exactly what the seller was counting on. The guy at the truck was friendly, confident, and almost too smooth. He showed him the steaks, real beef, he claimed. No “meat glue,” no tricks. It's just a great deal. The steaks looked… okay." A little thin. A little too uniform. But still, 20 for $39.99? It felt like one of those moments where you either walk away… or roll the dice. And he did. He paid. Took the box. Drove home, wondering if he just scored big or got played. Later, reality started to set in. The size. The quality. The reputation people online were warning about. Suddenly, that “deal” didn’t feel like a steal anymore. It felt like a lesson. If a deal feels too good to be true… it usually comes with a catch you don’t see until it’s too late. Be honest. If you saw “20 ribeyes for $39.99” in a parking lot… are you walking away or taking the risk just to see?
1:53

He was just running a normal errand… pulling into the parking lot of Lowe’s when something caught his eye. A truck. Loud sign. “20 RIBEYES FOR $39.99.” That’s not a deal. That’s a shock. He paused. Looked again. Did the math in his head. This didn’t make sense. Ribeyes don’t cost that little. Ever. But curiosity got the better of him… and that’s exactly what the seller was counting on. The guy at the truck was friendly, confident, and almost too smooth. He showed him the steaks, real beef, he claimed. No “meat glue,” no tricks. It's just a great deal. The steaks looked… okay." A little thin. A little too uniform. But still, 20 for $39.99? It felt like one of those moments where you either walk away… or roll the dice. And he did. He paid. Took the box. Drove home, wondering if he just scored big or got played. Later, reality started to set in. The size. The quality. The reputation people online were warning about. Suddenly, that “deal” didn’t feel like a steal anymore. It felt like a lesson. If a deal feels too good to be true… it usually comes with a catch you don’t see until it’s too late. Be honest. If you saw “20 ribeyes for $39.99” in a parking lot… are you walking away or taking the risk just to see?

Dr. CZ

1,614,556 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I am 100% sure I have the cure for what ails this guy, I would drop my boat and disconnect his trailer from his truck and drag that thing to a far away location where the only way he would find it would be the unlikely event that he has an AirTag on it. I am a little older now when I was younger I would have hauled that thing to my barn and cut it up with a bandsaw and taken it to the recycler.😤 Either I’m too much of a hard ass or people have gotten too soft, if someone puts a spoonful of mud up to your mouth and you eat it then you have a taste for mud. In cases like this lessons must be taught/learned, am I wrong ? There are too many bellyachers 😪🥱HANDLE IT 😡
0:28

I am 100% sure I have the cure for what ails this guy, I would drop my boat and disconnect his trailer from his truck and drag that thing to a far away location where the only way he would find it would be the unlikely event that he has an AirTag on it. I am a little older now when I was younger I would have hauled that thing to my barn and cut it up with a bandsaw and taken it to the recycler.😤 Either I’m too much of a hard ass or people have gotten too soft, if someone puts a spoonful of mud up to your mouth and you eat it then you have a taste for mud. In cases like this lessons must be taught/learned, am I wrong ? There are too many bellyachers 😪🥱HANDLE IT 😡

MAGA X Times Daily News 🇺🇸

27,420 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This guy is using the left hand lane , which is open. There is a mile long backup and everyone is over in the right hand lane. He drives all the way up until he has to merge. Some people are saying what a jerk he is for not getting in line like everyone else, but a great many people are saying that the cars in the right lane merged into one lane too soon and that if they had used the left lane, instead of being a mile backup it would have been a half a mile backup. What’s your take? Do you think he was correct in using the left lane and merging up at the front or should he have merged right and got in line way in the back like everyone else?
1:24

This guy is using the left hand lane , which is open. There is a mile long backup and everyone is over in the right hand lane. He drives all the way up until he has to merge. Some people are saying what a jerk he is for not getting in line like everyone else, but a great many people are saying that the cars in the right lane merged into one lane too soon and that if they had used the left lane, instead of being a mile backup it would have been a half a mile backup. What’s your take? Do you think he was correct in using the left lane and merging up at the front or should he have merged right and got in line way in the back like everyone else?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

3,238,844 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.
4:05

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

36,929 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

Sukihana reveals to Bobbi Althoff that she has once been in a threesome and she narrated what happened revealing the guy who was involved was so excited about it but he had a little problem whereby he couldn’t get HARD💀😭 Bobbi says alot of guys would love to have threesome but they don’t just say it and Suki claims people that keep having threesomes all the time are always using drugs👀 “The guy just had a little problem with, he couldn’t be a part of it that much, he wanted to and i think he was really excited about it and it just didn’t work out for him, he was so excited but he just couldn’t get hard, finally got to the moment to do it and he just failed, so embarrassing”😭
1:50

Sukihana reveals to Bobbi Althoff that she has once been in a threesome and she narrated what happened revealing the guy who was involved was so excited about it but he had a little problem whereby he couldn’t get HARD💀😭 Bobbi says alot of guys would love to have threesome but they don’t just say it and Suki claims people that keep having threesomes all the time are always using drugs👀 “The guy just had a little problem with, he couldn’t be a part of it that much, he wanted to and i think he was really excited about it and it just didn’t work out for him, he was so excited but he just couldn’t get hard, finally got to the moment to do it and he just failed, so embarrassing”😭

flame⛧

97,861 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Brian Burns talks about what he's seen from Drake Maye: "He's talented. Talented arm. I'm not really too sure yet about how quick he is to process everything, but I do feel like he makes the right plays at the right time. He does seem to be poised, maybe a little bit too poised, in the pocket, but just overall, he's been showing his talent, for sure." Follow-up: "What do you mean about too poised?" Burns: "I feel like, at times, he's so caught up in making the right play or getting so caught up in his routes downfield, he just forgets about somewhat of who's rushing him, if that makes sense. It could be a bad thing, it could be a good thing. What I mean by poised is that he takes his time, he makes the right reads and he tries to make the right play. It can also bite you in the butt at a certain amount of times if you've got edge rushers coming and you're not really too cognitive of where they are."
1:10

Brian Burns talks about what he's seen from Drake Maye: "He's talented. Talented arm. I'm not really too sure yet about how quick he is to process everything, but I do feel like he makes the right plays at the right time. He does seem to be poised, maybe a little bit too poised, in the pocket, but just overall, he's been showing his talent, for sure." Follow-up: "What do you mean about too poised?" Burns: "I feel like, at times, he's so caught up in making the right play or getting so caught up in his routes downfield, he just forgets about somewhat of who's rushing him, if that makes sense. It could be a bad thing, it could be a good thing. What I mean by poised is that he takes his time, he makes the right reads and he tries to make the right play. It can also bite you in the butt at a certain amount of times if you've got edge rushers coming and you're not really too cognitive of where they are."

Giants Videos

1,516,831 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

He thought a car was about to run him over, then that some thug was going to jump him, and right after that he was sure the police would mistake him for a criminal... way too much adrenaline in just a few secs.
0:27

He thought a car was about to run him over, then that some thug was going to jump him, and right after that he was sure the police would mistake him for a criminal... way too much adrenaline in just a few secs.

The Figen

139,984 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

This guy put an ad out for free rock. He wasn’t going to use it. 8 1/2 tons worth. You come load it and you haul it away. A woman messaged him that she wanted it. He told her to bring a big truck. She showed up in a mini van with buckets and was putting the rock into buckets in the back of her van. She asked him to take the ad down and she said she would come back for the rest of it. He’s kind of laughing about it in disbelief. Maybe she doesn’t have a lot of money. Maybe she wanted to use it to make her yard look nice and couldn’t afford to buy any. Instead of making fun of the situation, how about going out there and helping her. I’d have helped her. Would you have helped that woman? Or, was his ad sufficient- free rock, you load it, you haul it away? What would you have done?
0:59

This guy put an ad out for free rock. He wasn’t going to use it. 8 1/2 tons worth. You come load it and you haul it away. A woman messaged him that she wanted it. He told her to bring a big truck. She showed up in a mini van with buckets and was putting the rock into buckets in the back of her van. She asked him to take the ad down and she said she would come back for the rest of it. He’s kind of laughing about it in disbelief. Maybe she doesn’t have a lot of money. Maybe she wanted to use it to make her yard look nice and couldn’t afford to buy any. Instead of making fun of the situation, how about going out there and helping her. I’d have helped her. Would you have helped that woman? Or, was his ad sufficient- free rock, you load it, you haul it away? What would you have done?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

3,458,843 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This is in Atlanta, Georgia. Fed Ex delivers the packages and then a few moments later, a guy wearing an Amazon vest delivers a package, looks around behind him, and then takes the Fed Ex packages, even though an electronic voice tells him he is being recorded. 😳 Notice he backs up too as he leaves as to not have his license plate recorded. Doesn’t look like he works for Amazon as their delivery drivers usually take photos of their drops as well. Not all deliveries, but usually. But, it would be a clever way to not be noticed by neighbors or anyone else. They would just think he was making a delivery if he indeed didn’t work for them. The more and more I see of this, the more I think it would be wise to have your deliveries sent to a UPS store. Too many thieves waiting to take what isn’t theirs these days. Do you have expensive items delivered to your house? iPads? Cell phones, etc.? Or, do you have your deliveries like that sent to a UPS Store or something similar?
0:52

This is in Atlanta, Georgia. Fed Ex delivers the packages and then a few moments later, a guy wearing an Amazon vest delivers a package, looks around behind him, and then takes the Fed Ex packages, even though an electronic voice tells him he is being recorded. 😳 Notice he backs up too as he leaves as to not have his license plate recorded. Doesn’t look like he works for Amazon as their delivery drivers usually take photos of their drops as well. Not all deliveries, but usually. But, it would be a clever way to not be noticed by neighbors or anyone else. They would just think he was making a delivery if he indeed didn’t work for them. The more and more I see of this, the more I think it would be wise to have your deliveries sent to a UPS store. Too many thieves waiting to take what isn’t theirs these days. Do you have expensive items delivered to your house? iPads? Cell phones, etc.? Or, do you have your deliveries like that sent to a UPS Store or something similar?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,167,291 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This lovely driving day turned into rage. The white car speeds ahead of the semi and gets over in front of him. The semi then gets in the left passing lane and you think he’s going to get ahead of him and get over but no, he just decides to run the white car off the road. 😳 I get not liking a car getting in front of you and maybe slowing down or putting in their brakes. But let’s not try to end someone or run them off the road because you didn’t like than getting in front of you. 🤯 Who do you think was at fault? The white car or do you think the semi was totally out of line for doing that?
0:47

This lovely driving day turned into rage. The white car speeds ahead of the semi and gets over in front of him. The semi then gets in the left passing lane and you think he’s going to get ahead of him and get over but no, he just decides to run the white car off the road. 😳 I get not liking a car getting in front of you and maybe slowing down or putting in their brakes. But let’s not try to end someone or run them off the road because you didn’t like than getting in front of you. 🤯 Who do you think was at fault? The white car or do you think the semi was totally out of line for doing that?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

32,387 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This guy just rips into this officer. 😳 Anyone that ever had a bad day only to be iced off by getting pulled over? That seems to be where this guy is right here. He says just about everything that someone wants to say on a day like that, but usually we do not. He also brings up an interesting debate.. The law says he must present his ID and technically he is presenting it. Does that mean he needed to hand it to the officer or was he legal in what he did?
3:16

This guy just rips into this officer. 😳 Anyone that ever had a bad day only to be iced off by getting pulled over? That seems to be where this guy is right here. He says just about everything that someone wants to say on a day like that, but usually we do not. He also brings up an interesting debate.. The law says he must present his ID and technically he is presenting it. Does that mean he needed to hand it to the officer or was he legal in what he did?

Giggling Ganon

180,240 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

People are bracing for a winter storm so you know many of the stores are running scarce on necessities like toilet paper, milk and water. These two pulled up on the last few cases of water in the store knowing this might be the last few cases in the city. The woman asks him to put them in her cart, he never agreed but instead he takes them all for himself. She then tries to scold him for not giving it to her first. These two both have families to look after in this weather emergency, was he being selfish for taking them all, or was she being selfish thinking that she could have him do it for her knowing he needed some too?
1:59

People are bracing for a winter storm so you know many of the stores are running scarce on necessities like toilet paper, milk and water. These two pulled up on the last few cases of water in the store knowing this might be the last few cases in the city. The woman asks him to put them in her cart, he never agreed but instead he takes them all for himself. She then tries to scold him for not giving it to her first. These two both have families to look after in this weather emergency, was he being selfish for taking them all, or was she being selfish thinking that she could have him do it for her knowing he needed some too?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

36,132 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Kevin Durant was asked if Dillion Brooks trash talk got him going: “Not at all. I’m not giving him that. He don’t get that type of credit with me. Maybe with other guys that may turn up when he talks to em but he’s not that important. Especially to me to get me going. I wake up going, getting ready to play. I respect it and what he brings to the team. I think that gets him going more than me. I was just happy to get the ball right after and make a move but it wasn’t in spite of Dillon to show him up. He’s not that much of a concern to me”
0:48

Kevin Durant was asked if Dillion Brooks trash talk got him going: “Not at all. I’m not giving him that. He don’t get that type of credit with me. Maybe with other guys that may turn up when he talks to em but he’s not that important. Especially to me to get me going. I wake up going, getting ready to play. I respect it and what he brings to the team. I think that gets him going more than me. I was just happy to get the ball right after and make a move but it wasn’t in spite of Dillon to show him up. He’s not that much of a concern to me”

NBA Courtside

1,770,295 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)
3:29

🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)

Joe Murgia

30,311 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce