Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This has been a hugely difficult vote. There are compelling arguments on both sides and I realise my decision will be supported by some and opposed by others. But looking at the detail, I could not support the Bill tonight with the risks of coercion and lack of safeguards.

34,257 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

31 Kommentare

Profilbild von Isabel Grant
Isabel Grantvor 6 Monaten

Scotland has dodged a literal and metaphorical bullet with this vote. Congratulations.

Profilbild von Giraffe
Giraffevor 6 Monaten

My step sister was given 3 months to live with aggressive cancer. She stopped doing chemo and she has been cancer free for several years now. Doctors did not know how she suddenly got rid of cancer after stopping chemo. My point is doctors can be very wrong.

Profilbild von Ronnie Allan
Ronnie Allanvor 6 Monaten

Coercion, NO, it's only available to people with terminal illness diagnosis with 6 months to live.🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇨🇵

Profilbild von Sir GBear of the burgh.
Sir GBear of the burgh.vor 6 Monaten

Farcical. It should never have been a vote for Holyrood, it should have been a referendum for the people of Scotland. Next time your in a hospital go and explain your decision to people terminally ill and dying painfully…

Profilbild von Siam Bhoy
Siam Bhoyvor 6 Monaten

I understand the argument but walking into a care home environment whereby these people have no standard of life. At the same time, carehome bosses, empty these people's bank accounts, take their homes when many, given the choice would rather end it. Thats control.

Profilbild von Sherlock
Sherlockvor 6 Monaten

Shame on you. People deserve the right to choose.

Profilbild von The McGonigal ✝️🇬🇧🇦🇺🇳🇿🇨🇦🇺🇸♿
The McGonigal ✝️🇬🇧🇦🇺🇳🇿🇨🇦🇺🇸♿vor 6 Monaten

Thank you Douglas, i can breathe. I want help to live not help to die.

Profilbild von The Inverness Stop - Follow for Independence!
The Inverness Stop - Follow for Independence!vor 6 Monaten

The Tories not giving the slightest about human suffering? Unfathomable. It truly is.

Profilbild von P
Pvor 6 Monaten

There are no particularly compelling arguments about euthanising people. These are not pets to put down. Thank the Lord that the truth won today.

Profilbild von DevlinsBigToe
DevlinsBigToevor 6 Monaten

Fucking hell I’m agreeing with Douglas Ross 🙈

Profilbild von MD
MDvor 6 Monaten

Those who voted against euthanasia are monsters who have no empathy and zero sympathy. Just wait to see if you or a loved one is in excruciating pain and suffering 24/7 with only death to look forward to. Let's see if you are still against it.

Profilbild von Dougie McCann #MDANT
Dougie McCann #MDANTvor 6 Monaten

Because the Liverpool care plan where a patient is deprived of water & food is so humane but a peaceful death chosen by the patient obviously isn’t

Profilbild von BaronScarpia
BaronScarpiavor 6 Monaten

Except, of course, vulnerable patients can currently be coerced into declining antibiotics, chemotherapy, diuretics, food… It is lawful to refuse care “for any reason or no reason at all”. But the resulting death causes avoidable suffering.

Profilbild von Pag Stuff
Pag Stuffvor 6 Monaten

Are you representing the wishes of the majority of YOUR constituents @Douglas4Moray ? Do you know ?

Profilbild von Burnt Toast
Burnt Toastvor 6 Monaten

Pathetic. Hope you never have to watch someone you love go through hell subject to failing health service. Coward.

Profilbild von Janie
Janievor 6 Monaten

What is interesting is that, adults can make a decision to terminate a birth, (I am pro abortion) yet those adults can’t terminate their own life at a time when they are facing end of life. You can take your pet to end their life, yet those people can’t choose to do the same!

Profilbild von fiona Extremist💙🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇮🇪✊
fiona Extremist💙🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇮🇪✊vor 6 Monaten

You snivelling wee scrote its already happening,syringe drivers deliver more and more morphine till itcshuts down body! Obviousky you have NEVER HAD TO WITNESS A LOVE ONE PASS FR9M CANCER! NAH ALL ABOUT YOU,ITS NOT YOUR FUCKING CHOICE! HOW DARE YOU YA BRAIN DEAD FUKWIT!🤬🤬

Profilbild von Hazel Erasmus
Hazel Erasmusvor 6 Monaten

@RightToLifeUK Thank you Douglas. The decision must have been hard but it is the right one. If anything, the debate has highlighted the urgent need to improve palliative care and the amount of work it will take to improve the lives of vulnerable people at their worst moments.

Profilbild von Alison Caplan🎗
Alison Caplan🎗vor 6 Monaten

Those who voted against this bill are a disgrace. Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to make the decision. Scotland is a backward country.

Profilbild von rc1985
rc1985vor 6 Monaten

You really are utter shite! You’ll never get near the top! Morality often defines! In this case it absolutely does! Pathetic

Profilbild von TerfASaurusSex
TerfASaurusSexvor 6 Monaten

Correct decision. You only have to look at Canada to see the harm.

Profilbild von AliWoo
AliWoovor 6 Monaten

Jesus. Never thought I’d ever think you made the right decision. Thank you!

Profilbild von CDRangers
CDRangersvor 6 Monaten

An absolute coward. Good riddance

Profilbild von Scotoshi 丰 ⚡️☂️
Scotoshi 丰 ⚡️☂️vor 6 Monaten

We know. You prefer Scots to die a slow painful death by being trapped in this disastrous union against our will.

Profilbild von bryan tolland
bryan tollandvor 6 Monaten

Shame on you.

Profilbild von Michael Dye
Michael Dyevor 6 Monaten

Pathetic

Profilbild von JM
JMvor 6 Monaten

The vote should have been by the people NOT MSP's

Profilbild von skywalker
skywalkervor 6 Monaten

But you can afford an assisted death if you want one, that irony is not lost on me

Profilbild von Jing Jang Jane. Nationalism is not Patrotism
Jing Jang Jane. Nationalism is not Patrotismvor 6 Monaten

@ElaineFW Thank you!

Profilbild von Gazberto
Gazbertovor 6 Monaten

@mags0611 Did all the Tories vote the same ?

Profilbild von Mackdv. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Mackdv. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿vor 6 Monaten

Douglas Ross what is your opinion, about the below?

Ähnliche Videos

Today, I shared the most personal of stories publicly for the first time about my Mum’s impossible bind and lack of real choice in the late-stage of her terminal illness last year. I will let my speech, and her story, speak for itself here. This vote today was on whether we continue our work on this or not — not a final vote that would have seen this Bill come into law. I voted for the Bill to proceed for further consideration, like last time, but this was not the majority vote, this time. I’m disappointed that we cannot continue our consideration of this at this time, and then have been able to take a final view, like last time. I want to be clear that I fully respect and appreciate that there are different views on this issue. I’m grateful to every fellow resident who has been in touch to share theirs, and engaged with me and one another with care and consideration on this. My lived experience has made my belief in the principle of choice for terminally ill adults crystal clear. But regardless of my experience, my job is to be legislator. I would never vote for a Bill if I felt it were unsafe. Indeed, amendments of mine to the previous version of this Bill were accepted unanimously by MPs, with different viewpoints and from different political parties. I will always listen, and consider such decisions deeply. I hope that no matter whether we share the same view on the principle of this issue, this approach is welcome. It’s impossible for any two people to agree all of the time, but that’s doesn’t mean any of us have anything other than the best of intentions. I’m glad that I did what I could today to speak up for my Mum, and others with terminal illnesses who want to have choice over their life and their death. It was tough, but I know it’s what she would have wanted. The hardest part, though, is knowing that more people will now have to go through this same experience as my Mum, me, and my whole family, before this next comes back to the Commons - and I truly wouldn’t wish this on anyone.

Claire Hazelgrove MP

33,130 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

VIDEO | Delhi: On the split in the TMC, party MP Shatrughan Sinha said, “First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to the people of Asansol and West Bengal for giving me immense love, respect and support, and for ensuring my victory time and again. I first came to Asansol at Didi (Mamata Banerjee’s) invitation and on her instructions. In my very first election there, I secured a record-margin victory in what was the country’s first by-election at the time. Later, I also won a second time with a significant margin. Therefore, I would especially like to thank Mamata ji, the Trinamool Congress, and above all, the people of Asansol and West Bengal. I want to make it clear that I have always worked for everyone in Bengal, regardless of which party they belong to or whether they voted for me or not. I understand my responsibilities and will continue to fulfil them." He adds, "When I was going through a difficult phase after losing the Patna election in 2019, very few people stood by me. Mamata Banerjee was among the few who supported and encouraged me. She believed I should continue in public life without any gap in my parliamentary journey, and it was on her direction that I contested from Asansol. By God’s grace, and with the support of Mamata ji and the people of Asansol, I achieved victory. For the past few days, there has been a lot of speculation about me. Some people are speaking the truth, while others are spreading rumours. Some have claimed that I have joined the so-called rebel group. Yes, by nature I have always been outspoken. I often say that if speaking the truth is considered rebellion, then I am also a rebel. I have always spoken frankly and called a spade a spade. But I want to state clearly that Mamata ji stood by me during my difficult times, and today, in her difficult phase, I cannot abandon her. I was elected on the Trinamool Congress symbol - the ‘Jora Phool’ - not once but twice, with the blessings of God. Therefore, it is my duty and responsibility to stand with Mamata ji and the Trinamool Congress...my principle is very clear: when Mamata ji stood by me in my difficult times, it is now my duty to stand by her in this moment as well.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

680,809 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

After a lot of thought, I’ve made the decision that I’m going to walk away from journalism. This is not a decision I’ve made lightly. It has been coming for some time, and it has been something I’ve been thinking about for months. However, a number of things in recent times have significantly contributed to me reaching this point. I spoke briefly about some of this with these two lovely young lads on the podcast below. We didn’t have a huge amount of time to speak about everything, so I’ve added a little more context here following the recording. I want to start with the situation surrounding Jason Arday. It genuinely left me in a whirlwind of emotions. I was incredibly upset and, honestly, it made me cry. I was left feeling shocked and confused by what had happened. At the same time, I have to admit that I knew something like this was coming. I really did. I’ve written before about my experiences with the media, and about the effect that being targeted or misrepresented can have on you personally. For me, it has gone far beyond simply being upset by something I have read. It has affected me physically and mentally, and in the past it contributed to me self harming. I wrote a long piece about those experiences when discussing misinformation, which you can find at the top of my profile. So while this particular situation came as a shock to many people, I cannot honestly say that I was completely surprised. My experiences over the past year have made me increasingly aware of the direction in which parts of the media, and wider society, are heading. Then there is the situation involving me and Robert Jenrick, the people around him, his wider political circle on the right and his media circle, and the way I have been portrayed by them. In all honesty, I have found the way I have been portrayed deeply upsetting. It has not been an isolated incident or something that happened once. It has been consistent and, in my view, has often felt like an attempt to undermine the work I was doing by challenging and questioning people in positions of influence. The impact of that has been significant. To be completely honest, it has made me ill. What has also been difficult is seeing people accept a portrayal of me which, from my perspective, could not be further from the truth. And unfortunately, this is not something I have experienced only in relation to this particular situation. There have been numerous occasions where I have felt misrepresented by sections of the media. This particular situation has simply gained a significant amount of attention, which is why I have chosen to address it. There are many more reasons behind my decision to leave journalism. There is a lot more I could say, but I don’t want to sit here and list every single reason. Those two situations have, shall we say, been the cherry on top. The reality is that this decision has been developing for months. It has been on my mind since earlier this year, and I have gone backwards and forwards over whether walking away really is the right thing to do. But the wider culture surrounding the media has also made me question whether I want to be part of the industry at all. The media industry, in my experience, has become incredibly divisive. Sadly, I think that reflects wider society too. There is so much fighting, so much division and so much focus on scoring points against one another. I have received support from some people, and I will always be grateful to those who have stood by me and helped me. But, in my experience, that support has often been outweighed by indifference, division and people looking after their own interests. It can sometimes feel as though everyone is fighting everyone else, rather than trying to build each other up. It reminds me of politics itself: constant point scoring, competing interests and a desire to win rather than a desire to understand. 1/2

Jack Roworth

179,084 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen