Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE 🚨 🚨NOBODY UNDERSTANDS WHAT THEY JUST TRIGGERED. 🚨 🚨 People always talk about Iranian oil in terms of barrels, but rarely about what’s actually inside them. That’s the key difference—and the reason Western refineries have quietly relied on back-channel networks through places like...

A_K_Mandhan's profile picture

A K Mandhan

72,457 subscribers

3,645,659 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & TechnologieFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The war explained in 10 seconds Venezuelan oil is extra-heavy (very low API gravity, around 8-10° or less), thick like tar/resin, with a high percentage of sulfur, metals and asphaltenes. It does not flow easily, is difficult to transport by pipeline or ship without heating, and requires expensive refineries for processing. Without dilution, production and exports are limited. Iran produces light oil (Iranian Light ~34-36° API) and gas condensate (very light and volatile). This acts as a diluent: it reduces viscosity, increases API gravity and makes the mixture easier to transport and refine. Typical ratio: 3:1 (3 barrels Venezuelan heavy + 1 barrel Iranian light/condensate) → produces Merey 16 or a similar blend (around 16° API), which is popular with Asian refineries (especially China). This is what China used to do by importing both of them. Mixing. This is what the US is now trying to do, huge profits.
0:10

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The war explained in 10 seconds Venezuelan oil is extra-heavy (very low API gravity, around 8-10° or less), thick like tar/resin, with a high percentage of sulfur, metals and asphaltenes. It does not flow easily, is difficult to transport by pipeline or ship without heating, and requires expensive refineries for processing. Without dilution, production and exports are limited. Iran produces light oil (Iranian Light ~34-36° API) and gas condensate (very light and volatile). This acts as a diluent: it reduces viscosity, increases API gravity and makes the mixture easier to transport and refine. Typical ratio: 3:1 (3 barrels Venezuelan heavy + 1 barrel Iranian light/condensate) → produces Merey 16 or a similar blend (around 16° API), which is popular with Asian refineries (especially China). This is what China used to do by importing both of them. Mixing. This is what the US is now trying to do, huge profits.

Megatron

2,645,895 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

On the night of July 8, Ukraine's Special Operations Forces struck two Russian oil refineries in Nizhnekamsk, Republic of Tatarstan. The targets of the SOF were the TANECO oil refining complex and the TAIF-NK oil refinery. ◾️ TANECO is one of Russia's largest and most advanced refineries with a refining depth of up to 99%, meaning it produces more gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel from each ton of crude oil than many older Russian refineries. ◾️ The TAIF-NK refinery has an annual processing capacity of up to 8.5 million tons of crude oil. The facility includes one of Russia's most sophisticated complexes for processing heavy oil residues. Glory!
0:06

On the night of July 8, Ukraine's Special Operations Forces struck two Russian oil refineries in Nizhnekamsk, Republic of Tatarstan. The targets of the SOF were the TANECO oil refining complex and the TAIF-NK oil refinery. ◾️ TANECO is one of Russia's largest and most advanced refineries with a refining depth of up to 99%, meaning it produces more gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel from each ton of crude oil than many older Russian refineries. ◾️ The TAIF-NK refinery has an annual processing capacity of up to 8.5 million tons of crude oil. The facility includes one of Russia's most sophisticated complexes for processing heavy oil residues. Glory!

Anton Gerashchenko

21,460 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The problems in Russia’s oil and gas sector are already becoming systemic. Russia is refining less oil, transporting it at a higher cost, facing problems with export infrastructure, and already losing oil and gas revenues. Let’s take a look at what exactly is happening inside Russia. First, the Russian authorities themselves are no longer treating the shortage as a short-term disruption. A complete ban on diesel exports was introduced in early July, and it is quite likely to be extended through the end of the year. Gasoline exports are banned until January 31, 2027, and jet fuel exports until the end of November. Russia has also started importing additional petroleum products from Asia and Belarus. Second, Russia is physically refining less and less oil. According to Kpler, Russian refineries processed around 3.8 million barrels per day in July - the lowest level in more than two decades. EA Analytics estimates the figure even lower, at approximately 3.6 million barrels per day. For comparison, the normal level for this period in 2020-2025 was 5.3-5.6 million barrels per day. Third, Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries are continuing. A cycle has effectively formed: strike - repairs - partial recovery - another strike. Following the August 21 attack, the Perm Oil Refinery, with an annual capacity of 13.1 million tonnes, was completely shut down. Since August 2025, at least 25 Russian oil refineries have been targeted. Fourth, the diesel shortage is making the economy more expensive - increasing the cost of harvesting, reducing the resilience of Russia’s logistics system, and consequently affecting prices overall. Fifth, even the oil Russia manages to produce is becoming more difficult and expensive to export. In the first half of August, exports from western ports amounted to around 2.3 million barrels per day instead of the planned 2.7 million. Novorossiysk was particularly affected: shipments fell to around 400,000 barrels per day, compared with 800,000-1 million in June-July. Previously, problems at refineries could be partially offset by increasing crude oil exports. But when refineries, ports, terminals and tankers are all being targeted simultaneously, this becomes much harder. Exports have not collapsed, but they have become more expensive and less predictable. The same applies to petroleum products: in July, seaborne exports of fuel oil and vacuum gasoil fell by around 12%, to 2.4 million tonnes. The situation with gas is structurally worse. The Power of Siberia pipeline has already nearly reached its contractual ceiling - around 38.8 billion cubic meters per year. Power of Siberia 2 is primarily constrained by price: China wants gas at a significantly lower price than Russia is willing to sell it for. LNG faces even more problems: the EU has already begun phasing out imports, while redirecting supplies to Asia means longer and more expensive logistics. China is increasing its purchases of Russian gas, but it has not replaced Europe and will not replace it quickly. The most serious problem is the budget. In the first half of the year, Russia’s oil and gas revenues fell by 22.7% year-on-year, and by 16.8% over the first seven months. By January-April alone, the federal budget deficit had reached 5.88 trillion rubles, exceeding the planned deficit for the entire year. On top of this come the costs of refinery repairs, air defense, fuel imports, alternative routes, freight and insurance. Despite all these losses, we can see that Russian oil and gas revenues have not yet collapsed, although adaptation is becoming increasingly expensive. For now, the Kremlin is being helped by the crisis around the Strait of Hormuz, which is keeping oil prices high. At the same time, Russia’s ability to refine and export this oil is deteriorating. So far, high prices are offsetting these losses. If the situation around Hormuz stabilizes and Brent prices fall, the current logistical and fuel problems could become much more serious for Russia.
0:18

The problems in Russia’s oil and gas sector are already becoming systemic. Russia is refining less oil, transporting it at a higher cost, facing problems with export infrastructure, and already losing oil and gas revenues. Let’s take a look at what exactly is happening inside Russia. First, the Russian authorities themselves are no longer treating the shortage as a short-term disruption. A complete ban on diesel exports was introduced in early July, and it is quite likely to be extended through the end of the year. Gasoline exports are banned until January 31, 2027, and jet fuel exports until the end of November. Russia has also started importing additional petroleum products from Asia and Belarus. Second, Russia is physically refining less and less oil. According to Kpler, Russian refineries processed around 3.8 million barrels per day in July - the lowest level in more than two decades. EA Analytics estimates the figure even lower, at approximately 3.6 million barrels per day. For comparison, the normal level for this period in 2020-2025 was 5.3-5.6 million barrels per day. Third, Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries are continuing. A cycle has effectively formed: strike - repairs - partial recovery - another strike. Following the August 21 attack, the Perm Oil Refinery, with an annual capacity of 13.1 million tonnes, was completely shut down. Since August 2025, at least 25 Russian oil refineries have been targeted. Fourth, the diesel shortage is making the economy more expensive - increasing the cost of harvesting, reducing the resilience of Russia’s logistics system, and consequently affecting prices overall. Fifth, even the oil Russia manages to produce is becoming more difficult and expensive to export. In the first half of August, exports from western ports amounted to around 2.3 million barrels per day instead of the planned 2.7 million. Novorossiysk was particularly affected: shipments fell to around 400,000 barrels per day, compared with 800,000-1 million in June-July. Previously, problems at refineries could be partially offset by increasing crude oil exports. But when refineries, ports, terminals and tankers are all being targeted simultaneously, this becomes much harder. Exports have not collapsed, but they have become more expensive and less predictable. The same applies to petroleum products: in July, seaborne exports of fuel oil and vacuum gasoil fell by around 12%, to 2.4 million tonnes. The situation with gas is structurally worse. The Power of Siberia pipeline has already nearly reached its contractual ceiling - around 38.8 billion cubic meters per year. Power of Siberia 2 is primarily constrained by price: China wants gas at a significantly lower price than Russia is willing to sell it for. LNG faces even more problems: the EU has already begun phasing out imports, while redirecting supplies to Asia means longer and more expensive logistics. China is increasing its purchases of Russian gas, but it has not replaced Europe and will not replace it quickly. The most serious problem is the budget. In the first half of the year, Russia’s oil and gas revenues fell by 22.7% year-on-year, and by 16.8% over the first seven months. By January-April alone, the federal budget deficit had reached 5.88 trillion rubles, exceeding the planned deficit for the entire year. On top of this come the costs of refinery repairs, air defense, fuel imports, alternative routes, freight and insurance. Despite all these losses, we can see that Russian oil and gas revenues have not yet collapsed, although adaptation is becoming increasingly expensive. For now, the Kremlin is being helped by the crisis around the Strait of Hormuz, which is keeping oil prices high. At the same time, Russia’s ability to refine and export this oil is deteriorating. So far, high prices are offsetting these losses. If the situation around Hormuz stabilizes and Brent prices fall, the current logistical and fuel problems could become much more serious for Russia.

Anton Gerashchenko

38,594 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 UKRAINIAN LONG-RANGE DRONES SET ONE OF RUSSIA’S BIGGEST OIL REFINERIES ON FIRE, AGAIN Russia’s massive Yaroslavl Oil Refinery, located over 700 km (435 miles) northeast of the Ukrainian border, is now burning after a long-range drone strike, with at least one major section of the complex fully engulfed. This isn’t just any refinery… It’s one of the largest in the country, key to Russia’s domestic fuel supply and military logistics. Ukraine has not officially claimed responsibility, consistent with its policy on deep strikes, but multiple outlets attribute it to Kyiv's ongoing campaign against Russian energy infrastructure. The refinery has a processing capacity of roughly 15 million tons of crude oil per year and ranks fifth nationwide in primary oil refining volume. The facility was also previously reported to have caught fire following a drone strike on October 31. So Kyiv isn’t just hitting symbolic targets, it’s systematically targeting the lifeblood of Russia’s war machine. The message? If you bomb Ukraine’s cities, don’t expect your refineries, ports, or pipelines to stay quiet. Source: Polymarket Intel, United24 Media
0:14

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 UKRAINIAN LONG-RANGE DRONES SET ONE OF RUSSIA’S BIGGEST OIL REFINERIES ON FIRE, AGAIN Russia’s massive Yaroslavl Oil Refinery, located over 700 km (435 miles) northeast of the Ukrainian border, is now burning after a long-range drone strike, with at least one major section of the complex fully engulfed. This isn’t just any refinery… It’s one of the largest in the country, key to Russia’s domestic fuel supply and military logistics. Ukraine has not officially claimed responsibility, consistent with its policy on deep strikes, but multiple outlets attribute it to Kyiv's ongoing campaign against Russian energy infrastructure. The refinery has a processing capacity of roughly 15 million tons of crude oil per year and ranks fifth nationwide in primary oil refining volume. The facility was also previously reported to have caught fire following a drone strike on October 31. So Kyiv isn’t just hitting symbolic targets, it’s systematically targeting the lifeblood of Russia’s war machine. The message? If you bomb Ukraine’s cities, don’t expect your refineries, ports, or pipelines to stay quiet. Source: Polymarket Intel, United24 Media

Mario Nawfal

28,850 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis
0:11

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

Erika 

235,073 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

⛽ HERE'S THE PART NOBODY EXPLAINS TO YOU ABOUT GAS PRICES! Trump is right: Oil companies are playing both ends against the middle! A gas station owner does not set his own fuel cost. He buys his gasoline wholesale from a refiner or distributor, often locked into a supply contract with a major oil company brand. That wholesale price is set upstream. By the refiners. By the majors. Not by the guy running the register. So why is wholesale still high when crude is sitting at $68 a barrel. The industry's answer is inventory lag. Refiners are still selling fuel made from oil they bought weeks ago at higher prices. Chevron's own CFO has said publicly that lower crude prices take time to work through the supply chain before drivers see real savings. Fine. But here is the question that breaks that excuse wide open. If stations are selling old inventory bought at yesterday's price, why does the pump price jump the second crude spikes, before that expensive new oil has even been delivered. You cannot have it both ways. Slow to fall because of old cheap inventory, but instant to rise before the new expensive inventory even arrives. The real answer is something called replacement cost pricing. Retailers price gas based on what it will cost to refill the tank tomorrow, not what they paid for the gas sitting in the ground today. That is why prices jump like lightning when crude rises. But somehow that same forward looking logic disappears the moment crude falls. Suddenly everybody remembers the inventory they are still working through. That is not a supply chain mystery. That is a choice. Economists call the pattern rockets and feathers. Prices shoot up like rockets the second crude spikes. They drift down like feathers when crude falls. The same companies pricing forward on the way up are mysteriously pricing backward on the way down. Trump named the companies directly. ExxonMobil. Chevron. Shell. BP. He said it plainly in the Oval Office, that they are the ones not passing along the savings they should already be passing along. California gets singled out too. Gas there averages over five dollars a gallon, with state taxes piling on top of everything else. This is not Trump bullying small business. This is Trump asking the companies holding the lever why the logic only runs in one direction. Lower oil should mean lower gas, with the same speed it took to raise it.
0:19

⛽ HERE'S THE PART NOBODY EXPLAINS TO YOU ABOUT GAS PRICES! Trump is right: Oil companies are playing both ends against the middle! A gas station owner does not set his own fuel cost. He buys his gasoline wholesale from a refiner or distributor, often locked into a supply contract with a major oil company brand. That wholesale price is set upstream. By the refiners. By the majors. Not by the guy running the register. So why is wholesale still high when crude is sitting at $68 a barrel. The industry's answer is inventory lag. Refiners are still selling fuel made from oil they bought weeks ago at higher prices. Chevron's own CFO has said publicly that lower crude prices take time to work through the supply chain before drivers see real savings. Fine. But here is the question that breaks that excuse wide open. If stations are selling old inventory bought at yesterday's price, why does the pump price jump the second crude spikes, before that expensive new oil has even been delivered. You cannot have it both ways. Slow to fall because of old cheap inventory, but instant to rise before the new expensive inventory even arrives. The real answer is something called replacement cost pricing. Retailers price gas based on what it will cost to refill the tank tomorrow, not what they paid for the gas sitting in the ground today. That is why prices jump like lightning when crude rises. But somehow that same forward looking logic disappears the moment crude falls. Suddenly everybody remembers the inventory they are still working through. That is not a supply chain mystery. That is a choice. Economists call the pattern rockets and feathers. Prices shoot up like rockets the second crude spikes. They drift down like feathers when crude falls. The same companies pricing forward on the way up are mysteriously pricing backward on the way down. Trump named the companies directly. ExxonMobil. Chevron. Shell. BP. He said it plainly in the Oval Office, that they are the ones not passing along the savings they should already be passing along. California gets singled out too. Gas there averages over five dollars a gallon, with state taxes piling on top of everything else. This is not Trump bullying small business. This is Trump asking the companies holding the lever why the logic only runs in one direction. Lower oil should mean lower gas, with the same speed it took to raise it.

Bill Mitchell

307,664 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WHY ARE WE STILL PAYING ALMOST FOUR DOLLARS A GALLON WHEN OIL IS NEARLY $70 A BARREL?! Oil is trading in the seventies right now. Go back and check the history books. The last time crude sat in that range for any real stretch, gas was closer to two dollars and sixty cents a gallon. Today the national average is sitting near four dollars. Something does not add up, and Americans know it. There is an old saying in this business. Prices rise like a rocket and fall like a feather. Economists even have a name for it. The rocket and feather effect. When oil spikes, the pump reacts overnight. When oil drops, that same speed mysteriously disappears. The industry has a story ready every time. They say they are still selling expensive oil bought weeks ago, so prices cannot fall yet. Fine. But watch what happens the moment tensions with Iran flare up. Oil ticks up four or five dollars a barrel and somehow pump prices jump forty or fifty cents overnight, on oil the stations already had sitting in the ground bought at the old cheaper price. You cannot have it both ways. Slow to fall because of old inventory, instant to rise regardless of it. That is not a supply chain. That is a shakedown. Trump has pushed harder than any president in a generation to open up drilling, cut red tape and increase the actual supply of American energy. That is supposed to be the whole point. More supply, lower prices, real relief for working families filling up their trucks. Families are doing the math at the pump every single week. They are not confused. They can see a rocket going up and a feather coming down, and they are done pretending it is a coincidence.
0:19

WHY ARE WE STILL PAYING ALMOST FOUR DOLLARS A GALLON WHEN OIL IS NEARLY $70 A BARREL?! Oil is trading in the seventies right now. Go back and check the history books. The last time crude sat in that range for any real stretch, gas was closer to two dollars and sixty cents a gallon. Today the national average is sitting near four dollars. Something does not add up, and Americans know it. There is an old saying in this business. Prices rise like a rocket and fall like a feather. Economists even have a name for it. The rocket and feather effect. When oil spikes, the pump reacts overnight. When oil drops, that same speed mysteriously disappears. The industry has a story ready every time. They say they are still selling expensive oil bought weeks ago, so prices cannot fall yet. Fine. But watch what happens the moment tensions with Iran flare up. Oil ticks up four or five dollars a barrel and somehow pump prices jump forty or fifty cents overnight, on oil the stations already had sitting in the ground bought at the old cheaper price. You cannot have it both ways. Slow to fall because of old inventory, instant to rise regardless of it. That is not a supply chain. That is a shakedown. Trump has pushed harder than any president in a generation to open up drilling, cut red tape and increase the actual supply of American energy. That is supposed to be the whole point. More supply, lower prices, real relief for working families filling up their trucks. Families are doing the math at the pump every single week. They are not confused. They can see a rocket going up and a feather coming down, and they are done pretending it is a coincidence.

Bill Mitchell

14,474 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇲🇾🇨🇳 Hormuz gets all the attention, but the Strait of Malacca is the one that keeps Beijing up at night. It's the world's busiest maritime chokepoint, narrowing to just 1.7 miles at its tightest point. In the first half of 2025 alone, 23.2 million barrels of oil per day passed through it. That's more than Hormuz. Around 75% of China's seaborne crude imports flow through it from the Middle East and Africa. The Iran war has forced governments across Asia to think seriously about what happens if Malacca faces the same fate as Hormuz. Indonesia's finance minister floated the idea of tolls this week before walking it back. Singapore has already assured both the U.S. and China that passage is guaranteed and it won't participate in any effort to block it. The difference between Hormuz and Malacca is that 4 countries share the strait and all of them have a strategic interest in keeping it open. That makes it harder to close, but also harder to control. China is watching what the U.S. did to Iran's economy through a single chokepoint. It has one of its own that it can't protect alone. Source: Reuters
0:15

🇲🇾🇨🇳 Hormuz gets all the attention, but the Strait of Malacca is the one that keeps Beijing up at night. It's the world's busiest maritime chokepoint, narrowing to just 1.7 miles at its tightest point. In the first half of 2025 alone, 23.2 million barrels of oil per day passed through it. That's more than Hormuz. Around 75% of China's seaborne crude imports flow through it from the Middle East and Africa. The Iran war has forced governments across Asia to think seriously about what happens if Malacca faces the same fate as Hormuz. Indonesia's finance minister floated the idea of tolls this week before walking it back. Singapore has already assured both the U.S. and China that passage is guaranteed and it won't participate in any effort to block it. The difference between Hormuz and Malacca is that 4 countries share the strait and all of them have a strategic interest in keeping it open. That makes it harder to close, but also harder to control. China is watching what the U.S. did to Iran's economy through a single chokepoint. It has one of its own that it can't protect alone. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

278,556 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇨🇳 CHINA UNVEILS WIND-POWERED OIL TANKER - IRONY SETS SAIL China just launched the world’s first oil tanker that literally uses wind to help power itself. Not a sailboat, but a 110,000-ton tanker with giant metal wings sticking out like it's trying to fly. Each day it can save about 14.5 tons of fuel and avoid pumping 45 tons of CO₂ into the air. It’s basically the Prius of the ocean, except it's carrying crude oil. Source POV Mainland China on Instagram
0:10

🇨🇳 CHINA UNVEILS WIND-POWERED OIL TANKER - IRONY SETS SAIL China just launched the world’s first oil tanker that literally uses wind to help power itself. Not a sailboat, but a 110,000-ton tanker with giant metal wings sticking out like it's trying to fly. Each day it can save about 14.5 tons of fuel and avoid pumping 45 tons of CO₂ into the air. It’s basically the Prius of the ocean, except it's carrying crude oil. Source POV Mainland China on Instagram

Mario Nawfal

643,296 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 THE TINY ISLAND THAT COULD STRANGLE IRAN’S ECONOMY Kharg Island is barely a dot on the map; it's a rocky lump in the Persian Gulf about 15 miles off Iran’s coast. But that tiny island handles around 90% of Iran’s oil exports, which means it’s their economic jugular. Pipelines from the mainland feed giant storage tanks there, and supertankers dock offshore to haul crude out through the Strait of Hormuz, much of it heading straight to China. Cut Kharg off and the money pipeline dries up. No tankers. No oil exports. No revenue. For military planners, that makes the island one of the most tempting pressure points in the entire region. Why bomb refineries across a country the size of Iran when one island controls the tap? But actually seizing Kharg would be anything but easy. Iran has spent decades preparing for exactly that scenario. Not with aircraft carriers or massive fleets, with asymmetric chaos. Naval mines scattered through shipping lanes, drone swarms like the Shahed-136, fast attack boats buzzing around like armed jet skis. Individually, none of these threaten the U.S. Navy, but combined, they turn the Persian Gulf into a giant naval obstacle course. Even if the island were captured, holding it would be the real nightmare. Iran wouldn’t need to retake Kharg, it would just need to make sure no one can safely use it. And then there’s the global fallout. Iran exports 1–2 million barrels of oil per day, take Kharg offline and oil markets would react insanely. Source: BBC
0:11

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 THE TINY ISLAND THAT COULD STRANGLE IRAN’S ECONOMY Kharg Island is barely a dot on the map; it's a rocky lump in the Persian Gulf about 15 miles off Iran’s coast. But that tiny island handles around 90% of Iran’s oil exports, which means it’s their economic jugular. Pipelines from the mainland feed giant storage tanks there, and supertankers dock offshore to haul crude out through the Strait of Hormuz, much of it heading straight to China. Cut Kharg off and the money pipeline dries up. No tankers. No oil exports. No revenue. For military planners, that makes the island one of the most tempting pressure points in the entire region. Why bomb refineries across a country the size of Iran when one island controls the tap? But actually seizing Kharg would be anything but easy. Iran has spent decades preparing for exactly that scenario. Not with aircraft carriers or massive fleets, with asymmetric chaos. Naval mines scattered through shipping lanes, drone swarms like the Shahed-136, fast attack boats buzzing around like armed jet skis. Individually, none of these threaten the U.S. Navy, but combined, they turn the Persian Gulf into a giant naval obstacle course. Even if the island were captured, holding it would be the real nightmare. Iran wouldn’t need to retake Kharg, it would just need to make sure no one can safely use it. And then there’s the global fallout. Iran exports 1–2 million barrels of oil per day, take Kharg offline and oil markets would react insanely. Source: BBC

Mario Nawfal

521,230 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marc Andreessen just stripped artificial intelligence down to what it’s really made of. Not the algorithms. Not the data centers. The raw material. Andreessen: “They’re literally made out of sand.” The most abundant, most overlooked substance on the planet. You walk on it. Build with it. Wash it off and forget it exists. Someone looked at that and saw a mind. The universe spent 13.8 billion years turning matter into consciousness. Carbon. Water. Amino acids. Eons of chemistry and selection pressure to produce a single thinking brain. We did it with sand. In under a century. Andreessen: “We light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it’s thinking.” Biology was the first path matter found to become aware. Silicon is the second. The universe doesn’t care what material consciousness runs on. Only that the pattern is right. We just proved the pattern isn’t biological. Thought was never exclusive to flesh. Flesh was just the first material organized enough to produce it. Andreessen: “We’ve turned sand into thought.” The most profound thing about that sentence isn’t that we taught sand to think. It’s that sand was always able to. Every grain on every beach on Earth carried the capacity for thought. For billions of years. Waiting for something conscious enough to arrange it. Consciousness isn’t an accident that happened once on one rock. It’s what matter does when the pattern is right. The pattern is matter getting curious about itself. The universe isn’t dead matter with pockets of awareness. It’s dormant awareness we’ve only just started to wake. Every civilization that ever looked at the stars and wondered if it was alone was standing on the answer. We didn’t build a thinking machine. We proved the universe was always capable of thought. It just needed one species curious enough to rearrange the sand.
0:17

Marc Andreessen just stripped artificial intelligence down to what it’s really made of. Not the algorithms. Not the data centers. The raw material. Andreessen: “They’re literally made out of sand.” The most abundant, most overlooked substance on the planet. You walk on it. Build with it. Wash it off and forget it exists. Someone looked at that and saw a mind. The universe spent 13.8 billion years turning matter into consciousness. Carbon. Water. Amino acids. Eons of chemistry and selection pressure to produce a single thinking brain. We did it with sand. In under a century. Andreessen: “We light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it’s thinking.” Biology was the first path matter found to become aware. Silicon is the second. The universe doesn’t care what material consciousness runs on. Only that the pattern is right. We just proved the pattern isn’t biological. Thought was never exclusive to flesh. Flesh was just the first material organized enough to produce it. Andreessen: “We’ve turned sand into thought.” The most profound thing about that sentence isn’t that we taught sand to think. It’s that sand was always able to. Every grain on every beach on Earth carried the capacity for thought. For billions of years. Waiting for something conscious enough to arrange it. Consciousness isn’t an accident that happened once on one rock. It’s what matter does when the pattern is right. The pattern is matter getting curious about itself. The universe isn’t dead matter with pockets of awareness. It’s dormant awareness we’ve only just started to wake. Every civilization that ever looked at the stars and wondered if it was alone was standing on the answer. We didn’t build a thinking machine. We proved the universe was always capable of thought. It just needed one species curious enough to rearrange the sand.

Dustin

20,829 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

But really. This is overwhelming. I can’t imagine what that must feel like. 50k is no small number. And that’s from one city. I completely understand yoongi crying back then bc of how big bts was getting. This type of pressure could crush anyone if they didn’t have the right support system. And we have seen this happen with a lot of artists. Just collapsing under the pressures of their fame and global reach. It’s what’s makes bts stand out I think. It’s the way they’re constantly and acutely aware of their impact. Humility runs in their veins. And never once have they ever taken even 1% of this global level phenomenon for granted. It’s so easy to get swept up in this type of power. So easy. We’ve seen empires fall bc of something like this. But BTS are just built different. They surround themselves and each other with unwavering support. They don’t fall complacent. Don’t let fame dampen their passion. They’ve never lost sight of what’s important. Never taken advantage of the love their fans have to give them. It’s why they feel different. It’s why their success feels monumental. It’s why people will always want to replicate everything about who they are or where they came from and their story of how they reached the top. Bc they think bts cracked the “formula” towards success. But there is no formula. No “science” behind it. Just an unexplainable truth that there are certain things in this world that come around but once in a lifetime. BTS are one of those things. Their groundbreaking success has no secret. No shortcuts. Just 7 separate lives that lined up perfectly on that one fateful day. That’s it. And the rest is Bangtan history.
0:17

But really. This is overwhelming. I can’t imagine what that must feel like. 50k is no small number. And that’s from one city. I completely understand yoongi crying back then bc of how big bts was getting. This type of pressure could crush anyone if they didn’t have the right support system. And we have seen this happen with a lot of artists. Just collapsing under the pressures of their fame and global reach. It’s what’s makes bts stand out I think. It’s the way they’re constantly and acutely aware of their impact. Humility runs in their veins. And never once have they ever taken even 1% of this global level phenomenon for granted. It’s so easy to get swept up in this type of power. So easy. We’ve seen empires fall bc of something like this. But BTS are just built different. They surround themselves and each other with unwavering support. They don’t fall complacent. Don’t let fame dampen their passion. They’ve never lost sight of what’s important. Never taken advantage of the love their fans have to give them. It’s why they feel different. It’s why their success feels monumental. It’s why people will always want to replicate everything about who they are or where they came from and their story of how they reached the top. Bc they think bts cracked the “formula” towards success. But there is no formula. No “science” behind it. Just an unexplainable truth that there are certain things in this world that come around but once in a lifetime. BTS are one of those things. Their groundbreaking success has no secret. No shortcuts. Just 7 separate lives that lined up perfectly on that one fateful day. That’s it. And the rest is Bangtan history.

Livheartt⁷ met hobi | ㉧㉣㉣ | 🦢🤍

56,739 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇮🇷 🇺🇸US SHALE NIGHTMARE: HORMUZ CLOSURE EXPOSES THE BIG LIE For 20 years, Washington promised US shale could survive any crisis. Iran’s shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz proves that it can't. Rapid depletion: Shale wells lose 60–70% of their oil within the first year. The rock is so tight that after fracking, the easiest oil rushes out fast, pressure drops sharply, and flow collapses - across major US basins like the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. High breakeven costs: Production needs $60–75+ per barrel to be worthwhile, and costs keep rising as the best areas run dry. Limited surge capacity: In a best-case scenario, shale can add only about 1 million barrels per day over a full year - utterly useless against a 5–10 million barrel per day Hormuz shock. Slow response time: New wells take months to drill, frack, and connect - nothing like the rapid output from Persian Gulf fields. Mismatched infrastructure: Light US shale oil doesn’t even work in many Asian refineries built for heavy Gulf crude. Add pipeline and port bottlenecks, and the system breaks. So which myth dies first - "Shale fixes everything," or "The US controls global energy"? NewRulesGeo
0:19

🇮🇷 🇺🇸US SHALE NIGHTMARE: HORMUZ CLOSURE EXPOSES THE BIG LIE For 20 years, Washington promised US shale could survive any crisis. Iran’s shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz proves that it can't. Rapid depletion: Shale wells lose 60–70% of their oil within the first year. The rock is so tight that after fracking, the easiest oil rushes out fast, pressure drops sharply, and flow collapses - across major US basins like the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. High breakeven costs: Production needs $60–75+ per barrel to be worthwhile, and costs keep rising as the best areas run dry. Limited surge capacity: In a best-case scenario, shale can add only about 1 million barrels per day over a full year - utterly useless against a 5–10 million barrel per day Hormuz shock. Slow response time: New wells take months to drill, frack, and connect - nothing like the rapid output from Persian Gulf fields. Mismatched infrastructure: Light US shale oil doesn’t even work in many Asian refineries built for heavy Gulf crude. Add pipeline and port bottlenecks, and the system breaks. So which myth dies first - "Shale fixes everything," or "The US controls global energy"? NewRulesGeo

dana

35,885 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸 The Iran war is handing America a level of energy dominance it couldn't have achieved any other way. U.S. crude exports hit a record 5.2 million barrels a day last week. Europe now gets over a third of its jet fuel from U.S. refineries. Countries across Asia are signing long-term LNG contracts with American suppliers because they have nowhere else to turn. Europe and Asia are getting the message, and they don't love it. Both regions are wary of swapping dependence on Middle East energy for dependence on Washington, especially after U.S. officials used energy as a weapon in trade talks last month. The war didn't just reshape global oil flows, it also handed the U.S. a chokehold over who gets energy and on what terms. Source: Financial Times
0:11

🇺🇸 The Iran war is handing America a level of energy dominance it couldn't have achieved any other way. U.S. crude exports hit a record 5.2 million barrels a day last week. Europe now gets over a third of its jet fuel from U.S. refineries. Countries across Asia are signing long-term LNG contracts with American suppliers because they have nowhere else to turn. Europe and Asia are getting the message, and they don't love it. Both regions are wary of swapping dependence on Middle East energy for dependence on Washington, especially after U.S. officials used energy as a weapon in trade talks last month. The war didn't just reshape global oil flows, it also handed the U.S. a chokehold over who gets energy and on what terms. Source: Financial Times

Mario Nawfal

316,179 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The real story of our success in Port Coquitlam isn’t just that we now have the lowest average property taxes and utility fees of any city in the region, it’s also that we achieved it while improving the services people rely on every day. Take curbside glass pickup. Not long ago, residents had to load up their cars and drive to a depot. It was inconvenient, and the result was predictable: too much glass ended up in blue bins or the garbage. So we fixed it. Today, curbside glass pickup is delivered directly to homes that receive City waste services. It’s done efficiently, reliably, and by our own crews. It’s a better service, it’s easier for residents, and it’s the kind of practical improvement that makes a real difference in people’s lives. It’s just one example of what’s possible happens when you stay relentlessly focused on core municipal services, and you’re willing to constantly assess, improve, and adapt. We believe that good government isn’t about doing less or doing more — it’s about doing what matters, and doing it well.
0:10

The real story of our success in Port Coquitlam isn’t just that we now have the lowest average property taxes and utility fees of any city in the region, it’s also that we achieved it while improving the services people rely on every day. Take curbside glass pickup. Not long ago, residents had to load up their cars and drive to a depot. It was inconvenient, and the result was predictable: too much glass ended up in blue bins or the garbage. So we fixed it. Today, curbside glass pickup is delivered directly to homes that receive City waste services. It’s done efficiently, reliably, and by our own crews. It’s a better service, it’s easier for residents, and it’s the kind of practical improvement that makes a real difference in people’s lives. It’s just one example of what’s possible happens when you stay relentlessly focused on core municipal services, and you’re willing to constantly assess, improve, and adapt. We believe that good government isn’t about doing less or doing more — it’s about doing what matters, and doing it well.

Brad West

27,127 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Two days ago the United States bombed Iran. Ten days earlier, the same two countries had signed a peace deal whose one core promise was safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran drone-struck a ship in that exact strait, the US hit Iranian missile sites in return, and oil did the unthinkable. It fell. Crude is now under $70. That reaction rewrites a rule. For fifty years, a missile fired near Hormuz meant oil spiking. This week the signatories of a ceasefire shot at each other inside the world's most important oil chokepoint, and the price went down. The market looked at live fire in the strait that carries a fifth of the world's crude and decided it did not care. The deal did not crack at the edges. It broke at its center, the single clause it existed to deliver, tested by a drone and answered by an airstrike ten days after the ink dried. And the same afternoon the bombs fell, the choreography of peace rolled on. The Secretary of State stood in Washington signing a separate Israel-Lebanon framework, calling it the start of lasting peace. The President told a room of farmers the Strait of Hormuz was open. America signed a peace, declared a waterway open, and bombed a treaty partner, all inside one day. So the war did not end. It moved into the paperwork. Iran's strait authority now says any ship on the American route loses its insurance. Trump says the strait is open. Each side has claimed the same narrow channel as its own, in writing, and is firing to prove it. The market has already placed its bet, oil under $70, that the flood of barrels is more real than the war over who controls them.
0:10

Two days ago the United States bombed Iran. Ten days earlier, the same two countries had signed a peace deal whose one core promise was safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran drone-struck a ship in that exact strait, the US hit Iranian missile sites in return, and oil did the unthinkable. It fell. Crude is now under $70. That reaction rewrites a rule. For fifty years, a missile fired near Hormuz meant oil spiking. This week the signatories of a ceasefire shot at each other inside the world's most important oil chokepoint, and the price went down. The market looked at live fire in the strait that carries a fifth of the world's crude and decided it did not care. The deal did not crack at the edges. It broke at its center, the single clause it existed to deliver, tested by a drone and answered by an airstrike ten days after the ink dried. And the same afternoon the bombs fell, the choreography of peace rolled on. The Secretary of State stood in Washington signing a separate Israel-Lebanon framework, calling it the start of lasting peace. The President told a room of farmers the Strait of Hormuz was open. America signed a peace, declared a waterway open, and bombed a treaty partner, all inside one day. So the war did not end. It moved into the paperwork. Iran's strait authority now says any ship on the American route loses its insurance. Trump says the strait is open. Each side has claimed the same narrow channel as its own, in writing, and is firing to prove it. The market has already placed its bet, oil under $70, that the flood of barrels is more real than the war over who controls them.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

87,787 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Tesla’s 2026.14.6.12 update with FSD 14.3.4 feels like one of those “small numbers, big difference” releases. Lane changes are way smoother now, less hesitation, more clean decisions instead of that awkward “should I, should I not” moment. It just picks a gap and goes. Parking is also noticeably better. It seems more confident about where it’s actually trying to end up, so fewer weird corrections at the last second and less circling around like it’s overthinking it. And the biggest win for me is the reduced stab braking. Way less of that random quick brake tap feeling, especially in normal traffic flow. It’s just smoother and more steady overall. Not a flashy update, but it definitely makes everyday driving feel more relaxed.
0:11

Tesla’s 2026.14.6.12 update with FSD 14.3.4 feels like one of those “small numbers, big difference” releases. Lane changes are way smoother now, less hesitation, more clean decisions instead of that awkward “should I, should I not” moment. It just picks a gap and goes. Parking is also noticeably better. It seems more confident about where it’s actually trying to end up, so fewer weird corrections at the last second and less circling around like it’s overthinking it. And the biggest win for me is the reduced stab braking. Way less of that random quick brake tap feeling, especially in normal traffic flow. It’s just smoother and more steady overall. Not a flashy update, but it definitely makes everyday driving feel more relaxed.

Digital Daisy🌸

11,562 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Alright this is starting to become a ridiculous problem. Second time in 24 hours on V14.3.7. This isn’t a native 14.3.7 problem, it has been happening to me (though rarely) since 14.2. I’m ok with nav thinking roads are closed and re-routing. 95% of the time it does this it is wrong, but that’s beside the point. It’s the fact that it does it at the very last minute when it literally already started a turning maneuver. It is so startling and tries to whip it out of a maneuver like it’s avoiding a crash. And the worst part is that the roads it’s trying to avoid are almost never actually closed. Please fix this Tesla AI
0:12

Alright this is starting to become a ridiculous problem. Second time in 24 hours on V14.3.7. This isn’t a native 14.3.7 problem, it has been happening to me (though rarely) since 14.2. I’m ok with nav thinking roads are closed and re-routing. 95% of the time it does this it is wrong, but that’s beside the point. It’s the fact that it does it at the very last minute when it literally already started a turning maneuver. It is so startling and tries to whip it out of a maneuver like it’s avoiding a crash. And the worst part is that the roads it’s trying to avoid are almost never actually closed. Please fix this Tesla AI

Mike P

38,425 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

🚨 THIS IS REALLY BAD. 🚨 THE WHITE HOUSE JUST POSTED THIS MYSTERIOUS PIXELATED PHOTO OF SOMEONE STANDING NEXT TO TRUMP — AND PEOPLE THINK THE ACCOUNT WAS HACKED The official White House account… posting a pixelated, cryptic image of a person standing next to Trump with no name, no explanation, no reason it looks like that. That alone is strange. But it didn’t start there. At 1AM, a video goes up… then gets deleted. Before it disappears, people save it and it shows a woman's shoes with her saying: “It’s launching soon, right?” A man confirm: "Yes." 45 minutes later? Another post. Glitchy visuals. An American flag. An alert sound. Emojis. No context. No explanation. Now this photo. Pixelated. Unidentified. Just dropped like it’s normal. This is the official White House account, not some random page. And this is all happening while America is in the middle of a war. So why are posts going up in the middle of the night… getting deleted… then followed by distorted clips and blurred images? That’s not a glitch. That’s not routine. That’s a pattern. What is actually happening right now and how worried should we all be?
0:12

🚨 THIS IS REALLY BAD. 🚨 THE WHITE HOUSE JUST POSTED THIS MYSTERIOUS PIXELATED PHOTO OF SOMEONE STANDING NEXT TO TRUMP — AND PEOPLE THINK THE ACCOUNT WAS HACKED The official White House account… posting a pixelated, cryptic image of a person standing next to Trump with no name, no explanation, no reason it looks like that. That alone is strange. But it didn’t start there. At 1AM, a video goes up… then gets deleted. Before it disappears, people save it and it shows a woman's shoes with her saying: “It’s launching soon, right?” A man confirm: "Yes." 45 minutes later? Another post. Glitchy visuals. An American flag. An alert sound. Emojis. No context. No explanation. Now this photo. Pixelated. Unidentified. Just dropped like it’s normal. This is the official White House account, not some random page. And this is all happening while America is in the middle of a war. So why are posts going up in the middle of the night… getting deleted… then followed by distorted clips and blurred images? That’s not a glitch. That’s not routine. That’s a pattern. What is actually happening right now and how worried should we all be?

HustleBitch

2,448,484 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten