Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This is a great session to demonstrate how far Estimates has fallen. I asked a perfectly simple question: if a person followed the TGA's COVID-19 "vaccine" schedule, how many shots would they have had by now? Watch as they bob and weave to avoid answering this simple question. Part... of the reason for this is to use up time. The TGA session attracts a lot of interest, and my time is limited, so the longer they can draw out the answer, the fewer questions they have to answer. I then asked about a new study showing that the COVID-19 jabs produced spike proteins for almost two years after injection, despite being told that the vaccines stayed in the injection site and passed out of the body in a matter of hours. Professor Lawler tried to discredit the research, which was conducted by Yale, and refused to acknowledge that the spike proteins from the "vaccine" were being produced for years after vaccination, despite the paper stating exactly that. A substantial amount of my time was spent on them saying very little that they could be held accountable for later. I also asked about other studies linking vaccines with autism and received a similar response: the link between vaccines and autism has been discredited—nothing to see here, move on. The link between autism and vaccination has been well established, even with the small number of papers that have survived the bullying from big Pharma to protect their sacred cash cow. I will not stop pursuing the truth about vaccine harm. Note: This video combines two separate sessions into one video file.show more

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

166,126 subscribers

32,887 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Jikkyleaks 🐭1 year ago

Why did Lawler already have that script prepared for him and who prepared it? The #YaleGate study was laced with poison pills, and Lawler was allowed to use them. Yet someone wrote that script for him. We should ask who wrote it and ask for every draft.

Places Visited & Pictures Taken2 years ago

Wondering what happens when AI is used? Here’s the answer 🙂

Oh, Cee Dee1 year ago

Solid work mate.

Plato1 year ago

Australian government with the help of health officials have killed and destroyed the immune system of millions healthy Australians 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺all should be prosecuted and jailed

madDaZ1 year ago

@Allegedlydlive 8 vaccines !!! Fukn 8 … Wow … I had 2 ivermectin … And I don’t have worms either 🤘

RNLilydale 🏴‍☠️1 year ago

Professor Langham is a Narcissist B!tch tho…

Garth Scaysbrook1 year ago

Thank you

madDaZ1 year ago

@Allegedlydlive Can’t listen to this bs deflection TGA failed Australians These Carnts Must be held to Account ! Criminal Carnts

Tony Scott 🧄(🦆🐓🐵🧪🧬🪪)❌=↑🧄🧄🧄🥩🥚🧀↓👽👾🤖1 year ago

"Not aware of spike being produced for years".. Its going to be fun to watch the fireworks as the more data emerges in so called healthy people and kids.

Food as Medicine 🌿1 year ago

Thank you for asking the questions and putting them on record for wilful ignorance.

Justin Ryan1 year ago

If only they have the same scrutiny to the Pfizer studies

Related Videos

"Stunning reversal by the CDC, very quietly I might add." "They have announced that they will be removing the statement 'vaccines do not cause autism' from their webpage because they said that is not a statement of fact and backed by any evidence." "They say that there has not been sufficient studies done to prove that infant and childhood vaccinations do NOT cause or have any link to autism." The powers that be have told us for YEARS that there is no link between vaccines and autism. YEARS. They said the studies have been done. ALL LIES!!!

"Stunning reversal by the CDC, very quietly I might add." "They have announced that they will be removing the statement 'vaccines do not cause autism' from their webpage because they said that is not a statement of fact and backed by any evidence." "They say that there has not been sufficient studies done to prove that infant and childhood vaccinations do NOT cause or have any link to autism." The powers that be have told us for YEARS that there is no link between vaccines and autism. YEARS. They said the studies have been done. ALL LIES!!!

AmericanPapaBear™

21,028 views • 7 months ago

This exchange during Senate Estimates with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) sums up just how bad Estimates has become under the Albanese Labor Government. The TGA is well aware that Senators only have a few minutes to ask questions, and they understand that the more they can stall, the less likely it is they’ll have to say anything that could cause problems for their Minister—regardless of the truth. Because of this, the Minister will not require the "witness" to answer the question, nor will the Committee Chair—both of whom are Labor Senators. My first question was a genuine attempt to clarify misinformation circulating online about aluminium intake. The answer was a simple "yes." Keep that in mind when you watch the video. Instead of confirming the obvious and allowing us to move on to another question about aluminium in vaccines, the opportunity was taken to stall for time by debating whether the question should even be asked at all. Dr. Lawler, Deputy Secretary of the Health Products Regulation Group within the Department of Health, oversees the agencies and committees the Government uses to spread responsibility, avoiding accountability. He was exactly the right person to direct these questions to. The data I presented was straightforward: the level of aluminium in vaccines is unsafe for infants by an order of magnitude. Yet the TGA spent a great deal of time on their pre-prepared responses insisting that vaccines are safe. They refuse to accept any data showing that this level of exposure is causing health issues in infants. I then asked whether our vaccines had been subject to gold standard testing—a term used on many occasions by "witnesses" attending Estimates to defend COVID vaccines - yet suddenly, the gold standard is no longer relevant to ... vaccines! Suddenly, testing a product against a double-blind placebo (saline) is now considered "unsafe," despite this being the standard for a century? In reality, what Big Pharma has been doing for years—and what the TGA has allowed them to do in Australia—is to compare new vaccines (or medications for that matter) against existing ones, rather than saline. If the harm detected is the same as that already being caused by the "placebo" medication, it's deemed safe. This is not how things should be. I will continue this line of questioning until we get a proper inquiry into the level of heavy metal contamination in infant vaccines. — Senate Estimates | October 2025

This exchange during Senate Estimates with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) sums up just how bad Estimates has become under the Albanese Labor Government. The TGA is well aware that Senators only have a few minutes to ask questions, and they understand that the more they can stall, the less likely it is they’ll have to say anything that could cause problems for their Minister—regardless of the truth. Because of this, the Minister will not require the "witness" to answer the question, nor will the Committee Chair—both of whom are Labor Senators. My first question was a genuine attempt to clarify misinformation circulating online about aluminium intake. The answer was a simple "yes." Keep that in mind when you watch the video. Instead of confirming the obvious and allowing us to move on to another question about aluminium in vaccines, the opportunity was taken to stall for time by debating whether the question should even be asked at all. Dr. Lawler, Deputy Secretary of the Health Products Regulation Group within the Department of Health, oversees the agencies and committees the Government uses to spread responsibility, avoiding accountability. He was exactly the right person to direct these questions to. The data I presented was straightforward: the level of aluminium in vaccines is unsafe for infants by an order of magnitude. Yet the TGA spent a great deal of time on their pre-prepared responses insisting that vaccines are safe. They refuse to accept any data showing that this level of exposure is causing health issues in infants. I then asked whether our vaccines had been subject to gold standard testing—a term used on many occasions by "witnesses" attending Estimates to defend COVID vaccines - yet suddenly, the gold standard is no longer relevant to ... vaccines! Suddenly, testing a product against a double-blind placebo (saline) is now considered "unsafe," despite this being the standard for a century? In reality, what Big Pharma has been doing for years—and what the TGA has allowed them to do in Australia—is to compare new vaccines (or medications for that matter) against existing ones, rather than saline. If the harm detected is the same as that already being caused by the "placebo" medication, it's deemed safe. This is not how things should be. I will continue this line of questioning until we get a proper inquiry into the level of heavy metal contamination in infant vaccines. — Senate Estimates | October 2025

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

24,931 views • 8 months ago

The U.S. CDC has changed its guidance on vaccines. The new guidance states that it is not possible to declare vaccines safe because there is no proof that they are. I asked the TGA whether they had changed their own position as a result. The ensuing discussion was pure semantics, as the TGA tried to avoid agreeing with the CDC. For the record, the theory of logic states: “An outcome that has not been proven impossible may be possible.” To avoid what comes next—a simple question—the TGA had to deny basic logic. That question was: If it MAY be possible, shouldn’t you take a fresh look? In previous Estimates hearings, I have presented the TGA with peer-reviewed, published papers showing that adjuvants (preservatives) in vaccines can cause autism. These papers actually show causation—the damage to the brain caused by adjuvants used in vaccines. The testimony from Professor Lawler was simply wrong, and I will revisit this question in the February Estimates. — Senate Estimates | December 2025

The U.S. CDC has changed its guidance on vaccines. The new guidance states that it is not possible to declare vaccines safe because there is no proof that they are. I asked the TGA whether they had changed their own position as a result. The ensuing discussion was pure semantics, as the TGA tried to avoid agreeing with the CDC. For the record, the theory of logic states: “An outcome that has not been proven impossible may be possible.” To avoid what comes next—a simple question—the TGA had to deny basic logic. That question was: If it MAY be possible, shouldn’t you take a fresh look? In previous Estimates hearings, I have presented the TGA with peer-reviewed, published papers showing that adjuvants (preservatives) in vaccines can cause autism. These papers actually show causation—the damage to the brain caused by adjuvants used in vaccines. The testimony from Professor Lawler was simply wrong, and I will revisit this question in the February Estimates. — Senate Estimates | December 2025

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

79,747 views • 6 months ago

Question: You were the chair of an organization that claimed that vaccines are a contributing cause of autism despite many studies… they find correlation. Do you still agree with these claims? RFK JR: I believe… we need to study the cause of autism. You say the potential for vaccines to cause autism has been studied…. Only one vaccine has ever been studied.

Question: You were the chair of an organization that claimed that vaccines are a contributing cause of autism despite many studies… they find correlation. Do you still agree with these claims? RFK JR: I believe… we need to study the cause of autism. You say the potential for vaccines to cause autism has been studied…. Only one vaccine has ever been studied.

Acyn

88,818 views • 7 months ago

MTG just declared that parents have the right to refuse vaccine mandates. Then she went head-to-head with NBC’s Joe Scarborough on vaccines causing autism. Watch this incredible moment: “I don’t think the government should mandate that.” “And I think children should be able to go to school or any kind of activity without being forced to take a vaccine.” “There’s potential links to autism.” That’s when the debate kicked off. Scarborough: “Not really.” MTG: “Actually, a lot of parents think that it is linked.” “And they have been ignored for a very long time.” Scarborough: “I talked to RFK Jr. I have a son who’s on the spectrum. I had questions in the early 2000s about this.” “There’s been one study after another … that does not link autism to vaccines.” MTG: “There’s people that would argue with you.” “There are many parents that link it to vaccines, and I really think it’s up to the parents.” Bill Maher: “If it’s not the vaccines … what is your gut as to why the rates went up so high?” Scarborough: “There’s been more of a diagnosis over the past 20-30 years.” MTG: “It also correlates with the number of vaccines.” “The amount of vaccines that children have to have now is outrageous.” Maher: “Yeah, they did up the schedule a lot.” Scarborough: “72?” MTG: “Yes.” Maher: “I’ve heard those high numbers. Yeah.” Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

MTG just declared that parents have the right to refuse vaccine mandates. Then she went head-to-head with NBC’s Joe Scarborough on vaccines causing autism. Watch this incredible moment: “I don’t think the government should mandate that.” “And I think children should be able to go to school or any kind of activity without being forced to take a vaccine.” “There’s potential links to autism.” That’s when the debate kicked off. Scarborough: “Not really.” MTG: “Actually, a lot of parents think that it is linked.” “And they have been ignored for a very long time.” Scarborough: “I talked to RFK Jr. I have a son who’s on the spectrum. I had questions in the early 2000s about this.” “There’s been one study after another … that does not link autism to vaccines.” MTG: “There’s people that would argue with you.” “There are many parents that link it to vaccines, and I really think it’s up to the parents.” Bill Maher: “If it’s not the vaccines … what is your gut as to why the rates went up so high?” Scarborough: “There’s been more of a diagnosis over the past 20-30 years.” MTG: “It also correlates with the number of vaccines.” “The amount of vaccines that children have to have now is outrageous.” Maher: “Yeah, they did up the schedule a lot.” Scarborough: “72?” MTG: “Yes.” Maher: “I’ve heard those high numbers. Yeah.” Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Holden Culotta

125,547 views • 5 months ago

RFK Jr. exposes a devastating truth the mainstream media refuses to report. The COVID vaccine injury reports in the federal VAERS system are not just high—they are catastrophic and unprecedented. The raw data reveals a staggering fact: reported injuries from the COVID vaccine alone surpass the total of all reported injuries from all other vaccines combined over the past 36 years. This is a systemic crisis of historic proportions. Meanwhile, the public is fed a constant, soothing mantra: "The science is settled." We're told by every talking head from Anderson Cooper to Jake Tapper that the vaccine-autism link has been thoroughly studied and "debunked." This is a lie by omission. As RFK Jr. details, those much-touted epidemiological studies only ever looked at one vaccine (MMR) and one ingredient (thimerosal). They have never studied the specific battery of vaccines administered to infants in their most critical first six months of life for a link to autism. Which vaccines are these? The most likely culprits: DTaP, Hepatitis B, Hib, Pneumococcal. The Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) explicitly admitted this. They confirmed that the only vaccine in this group ever studied for an autism link was the DTaP shot. And what did that single study find? A link. And how did they dismiss this inconvenient finding? By declaring the entire CDC-funded VAERS surveillance system—the only system we have—as "too unreliable" to count. Let that sink in. The government's premier scientific body admits the CDC's sole mechanism for monitoring vaccine safety is so fundamentally broken that its own data cannot be used to identify a problem. The system is designed to see nothing, so that authorities can claim to see nothing. This isn't science. It's a protection racket for Pharma, paid for with the health of our children.

RFK Jr. exposes a devastating truth the mainstream media refuses to report. The COVID vaccine injury reports in the federal VAERS system are not just high—they are catastrophic and unprecedented. The raw data reveals a staggering fact: reported injuries from the COVID vaccine alone surpass the total of all reported injuries from all other vaccines combined over the past 36 years. This is a systemic crisis of historic proportions. Meanwhile, the public is fed a constant, soothing mantra: "The science is settled." We're told by every talking head from Anderson Cooper to Jake Tapper that the vaccine-autism link has been thoroughly studied and "debunked." This is a lie by omission. As RFK Jr. details, those much-touted epidemiological studies only ever looked at one vaccine (MMR) and one ingredient (thimerosal). They have never studied the specific battery of vaccines administered to infants in their most critical first six months of life for a link to autism. Which vaccines are these? The most likely culprits: DTaP, Hepatitis B, Hib, Pneumococcal. The Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) explicitly admitted this. They confirmed that the only vaccine in this group ever studied for an autism link was the DTaP shot. And what did that single study find? A link. And how did they dismiss this inconvenient finding? By declaring the entire CDC-funded VAERS surveillance system—the only system we have—as "too unreliable" to count. Let that sink in. The government's premier scientific body admits the CDC's sole mechanism for monitoring vaccine safety is so fundamentally broken that its own data cannot be used to identify a problem. The system is designed to see nothing, so that authorities can claim to see nothing. This isn't science. It's a protection racket for Pharma, paid for with the health of our children.

Camus

70,374 views • 10 months ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 views • 7 months ago

Real Journalism. This was recorded in 2019 and is a must watch! For years, the government, medical establishment and vaccine industry have insisted that any science linking vaccines to autism is not to be believed. But what if the government's own pro-vaccine medical expert, who helped defend vaccines in federal vaccine court, privately told the government that vaccines can cause autism, after all? And what if the government not only covered that up but went on to misrepresent his opinion to debunk vaccine-autism lawsuits? Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.

Real Journalism. This was recorded in 2019 and is a must watch! For years, the government, medical establishment and vaccine industry have insisted that any science linking vaccines to autism is not to be believed. But what if the government's own pro-vaccine medical expert, who helped defend vaccines in federal vaccine court, privately told the government that vaccines can cause autism, after all? And what if the government not only covered that up but went on to misrepresent his opinion to debunk vaccine-autism lawsuits? Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

471,290 views • 2 years ago

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene just went head to head with Joe Scarborough on the link between vaccines and autism. The fact that this debate is even happening on a mainstream late night show shows just how far our movement has come. Watch this powerful exchange: MTG: “A lot of parents think that it is linked, and they have been ignored for a very long time.” Scarborough: “I will say … I had questions with, in, in the early 2000s about this.” “There’s been one study after another … that does not link autism to vaccines.” MTG: “I think there’s people that would argue with you.” “There are many parents that link it to vaccines, and I really think it’s up to the parents.” Then, Bill Maher jumped in to ask the question on everyone’s mind: “If it’s not the vaccines … what is your gut as to why the rates went up so high?” Scarborough chalked it up to the fact that it’s been diagnosed more over the past 20-30 years. But MTG insisted: “It also correlates with the number of vaccines.” And she thanked RFK Jr. for finally making a change: “The amount of vaccines that children have to have now is outrageous, and thankfully, Secretary Kennedy changed that.” Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 Bill Maher

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene just went head to head with Joe Scarborough on the link between vaccines and autism. The fact that this debate is even happening on a mainstream late night show shows just how far our movement has come. Watch this powerful exchange: MTG: “A lot of parents think that it is linked, and they have been ignored for a very long time.” Scarborough: “I will say … I had questions with, in, in the early 2000s about this.” “There’s been one study after another … that does not link autism to vaccines.” MTG: “I think there’s people that would argue with you.” “There are many parents that link it to vaccines, and I really think it’s up to the parents.” Then, Bill Maher jumped in to ask the question on everyone’s mind: “If it’s not the vaccines … what is your gut as to why the rates went up so high?” Scarborough chalked it up to the fact that it’s been diagnosed more over the past 20-30 years. But MTG insisted: “It also correlates with the number of vaccines.” And she thanked RFK Jr. for finally making a change: “The amount of vaccines that children have to have now is outrageous, and thankfully, Secretary Kennedy changed that.” Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 Bill Maher

Children’s Health Defense

13,217 views • 5 months ago

Morning Joe insists there’s no link between vaccines and autism — only to be stunned to learn kids were getting 72 shots before RFK Jr. took over HHS. MTG: “The amount of vaccines that children have to have now is outrageous.” JOE: “What’s outrageous about the vaccines that kids have been having for 30 years?” MTG: “Seventy-two vaccine [doses]… when we were kids, we didn’t have that many vaccines.” JOE: “I have four kids, and I didn’t give them 72 vaccines.” MAHER: “Yeah, they did up the schedule a lot.” JOE: “72?!”

Morning Joe insists there’s no link between vaccines and autism — only to be stunned to learn kids were getting 72 shots before RFK Jr. took over HHS. MTG: “The amount of vaccines that children have to have now is outrageous.” JOE: “What’s outrageous about the vaccines that kids have been having for 30 years?” MTG: “Seventy-two vaccine [doses]… when we were kids, we didn’t have that many vaccines.” JOE: “I have four kids, and I didn’t give them 72 vaccines.” MAHER: “Yeah, they did up the schedule a lot.” JOE: “72?!”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

565,337 views • 5 months ago

💉Gavin de Becker on why he wrote a book about vaccines and autism: "All governments throughout human history use fear to control their populations, and use deceit and suppression. On the debunking of vaccines and autism, people will say, "Well, that's been debunked." So, I ask the question, "Who debunked it?" 1⃣ So, you first find out that it was debunked by the Institute of Medicine. 2⃣ Number two, you find out that the Institute of Medicine is a paid organization that basically does crisis management for the US government. 3⃣ And number three is that the meetings, over 2001 and 2003 for the Institute of Medicine experts that they convened to debunk the vaccine-autism link, were transcribed. So, we have the actual transcripts. The very first thing said to them by the woman, Dr. McCormick, is, "There is one line we will not cross here, and that is to find that any vaccine is the problem or that the vaccine schedule should be changed in any way."

💉Gavin de Becker on why he wrote a book about vaccines and autism: "All governments throughout human history use fear to control their populations, and use deceit and suppression. On the debunking of vaccines and autism, people will say, "Well, that's been debunked." So, I ask the question, "Who debunked it?" 1⃣ So, you first find out that it was debunked by the Institute of Medicine. 2⃣ Number two, you find out that the Institute of Medicine is a paid organization that basically does crisis management for the US government. 3⃣ And number three is that the meetings, over 2001 and 2003 for the Institute of Medicine experts that they convened to debunk the vaccine-autism link, were transcribed. So, we have the actual transcripts. The very first thing said to them by the woman, Dr. McCormick, is, "There is one line we will not cross here, and that is to find that any vaccine is the problem or that the vaccine schedule should be changed in any way."

The HighWire

77,791 views • 9 months ago

Aluminium adjuvants (preservatives) in vaccines are commonly blamed, at least in part, for the increase in autism. Recent work has been done that confirms this theory, so I asked the TGA about the subject. Research on aluminium was conducted on aluminium salts, but the jabs use a quite different type of aluminium which has not been safety tested. This is my exact question: "A study published in September took biopsies from the brains of older children diagnosed with autism and found their brains contained significantly elevated levels of aluminium, especially aluminium hydroxide and aluminium phosphate, which are present in the hexa jabs. Has the health testing on aluminium build-up in our children's bodies been done using water-soluble aluminium salts, which are not used in vaccine products, or has this research been done using the actual aluminium used in vaccine products, aluminium hydroxide and aluminium phosphate?" This question was straightforward and simply put: have you tested the right type of aluminium for safety? The TGA feigned not understanding the question to avoid answering it. When pressed, they took the question on notice and then refused to provide further information, with Minister Gallagher covering for her bureaucrats. This is unbecoming for a senior bureaucrat and for the Minister. Australians want an answer to this, and I will keep at the subject until I get one. The fact they are hiding from the question suggests the answer is as recent science is showing - aluminium preservatives in "vaccines" are causing autism in some children.

Aluminium adjuvants (preservatives) in vaccines are commonly blamed, at least in part, for the increase in autism. Recent work has been done that confirms this theory, so I asked the TGA about the subject. Research on aluminium was conducted on aluminium salts, but the jabs use a quite different type of aluminium which has not been safety tested. This is my exact question: "A study published in September took biopsies from the brains of older children diagnosed with autism and found their brains contained significantly elevated levels of aluminium, especially aluminium hydroxide and aluminium phosphate, which are present in the hexa jabs. Has the health testing on aluminium build-up in our children's bodies been done using water-soluble aluminium salts, which are not used in vaccine products, or has this research been done using the actual aluminium used in vaccine products, aluminium hydroxide and aluminium phosphate?" This question was straightforward and simply put: have you tested the right type of aluminium for safety? The TGA feigned not understanding the question to avoid answering it. When pressed, they took the question on notice and then refused to provide further information, with Minister Gallagher covering for her bureaucrats. This is unbecoming for a senior bureaucrat and for the Minister. Australians want an answer to this, and I will keep at the subject until I get one. The fact they are hiding from the question suggests the answer is as recent science is showing - aluminium preservatives in "vaccines" are causing autism in some children.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

136,925 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Brian Hooker just told Jimmy Dore that the CDC has known about the link between MMR vaccines and autism since 2001. CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson came clean about a massive cover-up in 2014. “He released a statement essentially saying that the CDC and his co-authors on a study that came out back in 2004 had committed fraud.” “They did see a link between the MMR vaccine, the timing of the MMR vaccine, and autism incidence—specifically in African American males.” “What I subsequently found without him telling me … was that African American males, if they get the MMR on time—that’s anywhere between 12 and 15 months of age—were 3.5 times more likely to get an autism diagnosis than if they would have just merely waited until their third birthday.” “They knew about this as early as November 2001, and … destroyed the information at the orders of Dr. Colleen Boyle.” “She was definitively one of the co-authors in the cover-up regarding vaccines and autism.” “Everything that I’ve seen about these individuals that orchestrated this cover-up is that they were not trying to save children.” “They were trying to save a vaccination program that really, direly needed reform in order to help children, and in order to reduce the number of children that were being diagnosed with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.” Brian Hooker, PhD Jimmy Dore

Dr. Brian Hooker just told Jimmy Dore that the CDC has known about the link between MMR vaccines and autism since 2001. CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson came clean about a massive cover-up in 2014. “He released a statement essentially saying that the CDC and his co-authors on a study that came out back in 2004 had committed fraud.” “They did see a link between the MMR vaccine, the timing of the MMR vaccine, and autism incidence—specifically in African American males.” “What I subsequently found without him telling me … was that African American males, if they get the MMR on time—that’s anywhere between 12 and 15 months of age—were 3.5 times more likely to get an autism diagnosis than if they would have just merely waited until their third birthday.” “They knew about this as early as November 2001, and … destroyed the information at the orders of Dr. Colleen Boyle.” “She was definitively one of the co-authors in the cover-up regarding vaccines and autism.” “Everything that I’ve seen about these individuals that orchestrated this cover-up is that they were not trying to save children.” “They were trying to save a vaccination program that really, direly needed reform in order to help children, and in order to reduce the number of children that were being diagnosed with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.” Brian Hooker, PhD Jimmy Dore

Children’s Health Defense

39,810 views • 5 months ago

"People have to be held accountable for the damage they've done." Dr. Andrew Wakefield explains why he took up the cause of exposing the link between vaccines and autism, despite enormous pushback. "In 1995, mothers started calling me and saying: My child was absolutely normal, and then they had a triple vaccine—MMR—and they regressed into autism." "And so we investigated this. And, as is always the case in medicine, the parents were right." "And so we pursued the vaccine issue against a lot of pushback from my colleagues, and the medical school, and heavy investment from pharmaceutical companies." "And it turned out to be absolutely right... to the extent that when the CDC investigated it later... they found the data so compelling—that linked the MMR vaccine to autism—they had to destroy the data." "One of their senior scientists came forward 14 years later and said: We have done a terrible thing. We have lied, and we have put millions of children at risk of serious, permanent neurological injury." Credit: Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones

"People have to be held accountable for the damage they've done." Dr. Andrew Wakefield explains why he took up the cause of exposing the link between vaccines and autism, despite enormous pushback. "In 1995, mothers started calling me and saying: My child was absolutely normal, and then they had a triple vaccine—MMR—and they regressed into autism." "And so we investigated this. And, as is always the case in medicine, the parents were right." "And so we pursued the vaccine issue against a lot of pushback from my colleagues, and the medical school, and heavy investment from pharmaceutical companies." "And it turned out to be absolutely right... to the extent that when the CDC investigated it later... they found the data so compelling—that linked the MMR vaccine to autism—they had to destroy the data." "One of their senior scientists came forward 14 years later and said: We have done a terrible thing. We have lied, and we have put millions of children at risk of serious, permanent neurological injury." Credit: Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones

Wide Awake Media

86,119 views • 1 year ago

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Del Bigtree

29,919 views • 3 months ago

Aaron Siri sued the CDC with one simple demand: Show us the studies that allegedly prove vaccines do not cause autism. Their answer will shock you: “40 to 70% of parents who have a child with autism report that they believe vaccines cause their child’s autism.” “When you ask them what vaccines you think cause your child’s autism, they’ll say the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “On behalf of ICANN … we sent a Freedom of Information Act request, FOIA request to the CDC.” “We said, your website says vaccines do not cause autism. Please give us the studies that show that Hep B vaccines given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Please give us the studies that show that DTaP vaccine given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Same thing for IPV vaccine, for PCV vaccine, and for HIV vaccine.” “Each one of those vaccines is given three times each in the first six months of life. 15 injections.” “They never gave us the studies.” “I sued them in the Southern District of New York.” “Days before the hearing, I get a list of 20 studies, finally, from the DOJ, because they represent the CDC.” “19 of them have nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “They were all either MMR studies or studies of an ingredient that wasn’t in those vaccines.” “One of them was an Institute of Medicine [study] from 2012 that canvassed all the literature on whether DTaP vaccine does or does not cause autism.” “The Institute of Medicine … said, we can only find one study on DTaP and autism.” “And in fact it showed an association between [the] DTaP vaccine and autism.” “But the IOM threw it out because they said there’s no unvaccinated control in it.” “When their back was to the wall, they had nothing.” “There are no studies.” “They could not produce one that showed the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Here’s the thing they left out: there is one study out there regarding Hep B vaccines and autism.” “It’s from Gallagher and Goodman out of the University of Stony Brook.” “And it showed that kids that got Hep B vaccine versus those that did in the first month of life had three times the rate of autism.” Joe Rogan Aaron Siri

Aaron Siri sued the CDC with one simple demand: Show us the studies that allegedly prove vaccines do not cause autism. Their answer will shock you: “40 to 70% of parents who have a child with autism report that they believe vaccines cause their child’s autism.” “When you ask them what vaccines you think cause your child’s autism, they’ll say the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “On behalf of ICANN … we sent a Freedom of Information Act request, FOIA request to the CDC.” “We said, your website says vaccines do not cause autism. Please give us the studies that show that Hep B vaccines given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Please give us the studies that show that DTaP vaccine given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Same thing for IPV vaccine, for PCV vaccine, and for HIV vaccine.” “Each one of those vaccines is given three times each in the first six months of life. 15 injections.” “They never gave us the studies.” “I sued them in the Southern District of New York.” “Days before the hearing, I get a list of 20 studies, finally, from the DOJ, because they represent the CDC.” “19 of them have nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “They were all either MMR studies or studies of an ingredient that wasn’t in those vaccines.” “One of them was an Institute of Medicine [study] from 2012 that canvassed all the literature on whether DTaP vaccine does or does not cause autism.” “The Institute of Medicine … said, we can only find one study on DTaP and autism.” “And in fact it showed an association between [the] DTaP vaccine and autism.” “But the IOM threw it out because they said there’s no unvaccinated control in it.” “When their back was to the wall, they had nothing.” “There are no studies.” “They could not produce one that showed the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Here’s the thing they left out: there is one study out there regarding Hep B vaccines and autism.” “It’s from Gallagher and Goodman out of the University of Stony Brook.” “And it showed that kids that got Hep B vaccine versus those that did in the first month of life had three times the rate of autism.” Joe Rogan Aaron Siri

Children’s Health Defense

73,852 views • 4 months ago

The TGA have been caught red handed covering up deaths from the vaccine. This time it isn’t about some hard to understand biochemistry. No this is very straight forward. An autopsy was conducted on a 52 year old man after he died 7 days after taking the Pfizer vaccine. He collapsed in his home and died in front of his wife and 16 year old son. They tried unsuccessfully to revive him. The TGA never reached out to the family nor were they ever compensated. The Pathologist concluded the cause of death was Myocarditis following the Pfizer injection. Given Myocarditis is a recognised side effect of the vaccine why did the TGA not report this to the public? The answer is simple. The TGA did not want to admit they approved a dangerous medical product. This death occurred early on in the rollout when middle aged and young people were being forced to get the vaccine. Thousands of young and middle aged people have suffered serious injuries from the vaccine, not just from myocarditis but other serious conditions as well. Yet the TGA said nothing about the serious risks of this vaccine. How many other autopsy reports have they ignored. How many people have needlessly been injured because of the TGA’s deception? There is no way out for the TGA here. They don’t have the authority to override a qualified pathologist who actually examined the body. The TGA didn’t even solicit the autopsy. They don’t do it as a matter of course. Why not? How is this not criminal negligence? If the Government has any sense of decency they need to charge John Skerritt and Professor Kelly with criminal negligence now. They also need to compensate all vaccine victims and apologise to everyone they traumatised throughout the rollout. #auspol

The TGA have been caught red handed covering up deaths from the vaccine. This time it isn’t about some hard to understand biochemistry. No this is very straight forward. An autopsy was conducted on a 52 year old man after he died 7 days after taking the Pfizer vaccine. He collapsed in his home and died in front of his wife and 16 year old son. They tried unsuccessfully to revive him. The TGA never reached out to the family nor were they ever compensated. The Pathologist concluded the cause of death was Myocarditis following the Pfizer injection. Given Myocarditis is a recognised side effect of the vaccine why did the TGA not report this to the public? The answer is simple. The TGA did not want to admit they approved a dangerous medical product. This death occurred early on in the rollout when middle aged and young people were being forced to get the vaccine. Thousands of young and middle aged people have suffered serious injuries from the vaccine, not just from myocarditis but other serious conditions as well. Yet the TGA said nothing about the serious risks of this vaccine. How many other autopsy reports have they ignored. How many people have needlessly been injured because of the TGA’s deception? There is no way out for the TGA here. They don’t have the authority to override a qualified pathologist who actually examined the body. The TGA didn’t even solicit the autopsy. They don’t do it as a matter of course. Why not? How is this not criminal negligence? If the Government has any sense of decency they need to charge John Skerritt and Professor Kelly with criminal negligence now. They also need to compensate all vaccine victims and apologise to everyone they traumatised throughout the rollout. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

93,257 views • 1 year ago