Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 This is absolutely FRUSTRATING – and it says EVERYTHING about Canadian “journalism.” John Brassard, Chair of the House of Commons Ethics Committee (Access to Information, Privacy & Ethics), just gave a massive shout-out to independent podcaster Moose on the Loose – “Moose on the Loose”! Instead of recommending...

JayGenXer's profile picture

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

87,654 subscribers

25,006 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.
1:02

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.

Phil Williams

74,771 views • 1 month ago

Might be a minute late ⏰ on posting about this…. This is straight-up corruption. Conservative MP John Brassard, Chair of the Ethics Committee, just got disturbed to learn that despite all the so-called “screening,” the CFO of Brookfield had **instant phone access** straight to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s office. A meeting was arranged immediately. Brookfield — Carney’s old company — gets the red carpet while everyone else gets screened. This isn’t leadership. This is the ruling class taking care of their own. Ethics? The Liberals don’t even know what the word means anymore. Canadians are watching this blatant two-tiered access in real time. When does the accountability finally start? 🔥🇨🇦 #cdnpoli #LiberalCorruption
0:50

Might be a minute late ⏰ on posting about this…. This is straight-up corruption. Conservative MP John Brassard, Chair of the Ethics Committee, just got disturbed to learn that despite all the so-called “screening,” the CFO of Brookfield had **instant phone access** straight to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s office. A meeting was arranged immediately. Brookfield — Carney’s old company — gets the red carpet while everyone else gets screened. This isn’t leadership. This is the ruling class taking care of their own. Ethics? The Liberals don’t even know what the word means anymore. Canadians are watching this blatant two-tiered access in real time. When does the accountability finally start? 🔥🇨🇦 #cdnpoli #LiberalCorruption

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

30,959 views • 4 months ago

‘SA ETHICS COMMITTEE PAGUSAPAN’ WATCH: Sen. Kiko Pangilinan urges Sen. Robin Padilla to file an ethics complaint against him for raising his voice in plenary. Pangilinan says there are more important things to discuss in plenary and he will talk to Padilla at the committee. The actor-turned-senator used his time on the floor to defend himself from supposedly being sensitive or “balat sibuyas” for possibly filing a complaint. Padilla then says Pangilinan should just apologize on record instead of at the ethics committee.
1:05

‘SA ETHICS COMMITTEE PAGUSAPAN’ WATCH: Sen. Kiko Pangilinan urges Sen. Robin Padilla to file an ethics complaint against him for raising his voice in plenary. Pangilinan says there are more important things to discuss in plenary and he will talk to Padilla at the committee. The actor-turned-senator used his time on the floor to defend himself from supposedly being sensitive or “balat sibuyas” for possibly filing a complaint. Padilla then says Pangilinan should just apologize on record instead of at the ethics committee.

NewsWatch Plus PH

27,009 views • 3 months ago

Now the fun begins. Hawley: “For those who know ahead of time that they are going to join this body, they can no longer use qualified blind trusts. The reason for that, as you (Senator Lankford) know, the rules on qualified blind trusts are not air tight. They are actually very loose. It is very difficult to police and YOU don’t police them in the ethics committee.” 👀
4:56

Now the fun begins. Hawley: “For those who know ahead of time that they are going to join this body, they can no longer use qualified blind trusts. The reason for that, as you (Senator Lankford) know, the rules on qualified blind trusts are not air tight. They are actually very loose. It is very difficult to police and YOU don’t police them in the ethics committee.” 👀

Anna Matson

491,343 views • 1 year ago

Great news! The House Ways and Means Committee just passed Sen. John Barrasso and my Taxpayer Notification and Privacy Act. One of the biggest frustrations taxpayers have is the feeling that the IRS works against their interests instead of for them. That is why the Taxpayer Notification and Privacy Act is so important. It makes the federal government accountable to you by ensuring you are looped in and able to respond to any requests from the IRS for your personal information before it reaches out to third parties. Learn More:
2:38

Great news! The House Ways and Means Committee just passed Sen. John Barrasso and my Taxpayer Notification and Privacy Act. One of the biggest frustrations taxpayers have is the feeling that the IRS works against their interests instead of for them. That is why the Taxpayer Notification and Privacy Act is so important. It makes the federal government accountable to you by ensuring you are looped in and able to respond to any requests from the IRS for your personal information before it reaches out to third parties. Learn More:

Congressman Greg Steube

12,229 views • 8 months ago

Warren: "Will you disclose how you divest those assets, or will you just collect the check for $100 million from someone whose whole business is betting on what the Fed will do." Warsh: "As I said to the ethics officials at the Federal Reserve and the Office of Government Ethics-" Warren: "I will take that as a no."
2:14

Warren: "Will you disclose how you divest those assets, or will you just collect the check for $100 million from someone whose whole business is betting on what the Fed will do." Warsh: "As I said to the ethics officials at the Federal Reserve and the Office of Government Ethics-" Warren: "I will take that as a no."

The Bulwark

57,277 views • 4 months ago

So, boots-on-the-ground reporting, including live, unedited footage showing the public what’s happening in real time, isn’t “true” and “objective” journalism? And of course I interviewed experts about this story. I just didn’t find you to be at the top of the list, considering you believe birds the birds were too tall to test effectively, that “the scientific issues, actually, are the lowest priority,” here and that the biggest threat is a “lack of belief in government.” Oh, and let’s not forget your claim that “Rebel News and this entire far-right media ecosystem” are covering this story to “weaken government sovereignty.” Totally objective statements. How much funding do you get from the Supreme Governments you’re so eagerly to defending for your global vaccine research? Anything close to what the state-backed media that interviews you so often receives? Rebel News is funded by the people and last I checked, in a democracy, state sovereignty, is supposed to align with the sovereignty of the people the state serves. If there’s a great lack of trust in our government ( and there is ) that’s on independent journalists who shed light on that, it’s on the state, and the mouth pieces that deflect from government overreach by vilifying and dehumanizing the very people they’re failing to serve. But hey, I’d still love to interview you. Seriously. How about alongside another expert with a different perspective. That’s what objective journalism looks like, right? And don’t worry, “far-left” won’t come up at all. When is a good time for you?
0:25

So, boots-on-the-ground reporting, including live, unedited footage showing the public what’s happening in real time, isn’t “true” and “objective” journalism? And of course I interviewed experts about this story. I just didn’t find you to be at the top of the list, considering you believe birds the birds were too tall to test effectively, that “the scientific issues, actually, are the lowest priority,” here and that the biggest threat is a “lack of belief in government.” Oh, and let’s not forget your claim that “Rebel News and this entire far-right media ecosystem” are covering this story to “weaken government sovereignty.” Totally objective statements. How much funding do you get from the Supreme Governments you’re so eagerly to defending for your global vaccine research? Anything close to what the state-backed media that interviews you so often receives? Rebel News is funded by the people and last I checked, in a democracy, state sovereignty, is supposed to align with the sovereignty of the people the state serves. If there’s a great lack of trust in our government ( and there is ) that’s on independent journalists who shed light on that, it’s on the state, and the mouth pieces that deflect from government overreach by vilifying and dehumanizing the very people they’re failing to serve. But hey, I’d still love to interview you. Seriously. How about alongside another expert with a different perspective. That’s what objective journalism looks like, right? And don’t worry, “far-left” won’t come up at all. When is a good time for you?

Drea Humphrey

57,199 views • 9 months ago

James Comer says the House Ethics Committee will take over the investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar after a massive spike in her net worth was flagged in financial disclosures: “We’ve been informed in the last few hours that the Ethics Committee is probably going to have to be the committee that takes up that investigation. So we’re going to be writing a letter in the morning referring this to the Ethics Committee. It’s a simple investigation. There are two companies listed on Omar’s husband’s financial disclosure form. One was worth between $1,000 and $5,000, and then the very next year it was worth between $1 million and $5 million. Another one was worth, I think, $25,000, and the next year it was worth between $5 million and $30 million.” What's your response to this......??👀 Do you firmly support this? A. Huge Yes B. No
1:21

James Comer says the House Ethics Committee will take over the investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar after a massive spike in her net worth was flagged in financial disclosures: “We’ve been informed in the last few hours that the Ethics Committee is probably going to have to be the committee that takes up that investigation. So we’re going to be writing a letter in the morning referring this to the Ethics Committee. It’s a simple investigation. There are two companies listed on Omar’s husband’s financial disclosure form. One was worth between $1,000 and $5,000, and then the very next year it was worth between $1 million and $5 million. Another one was worth, I think, $25,000, and the next year it was worth between $5 million and $30 million.” What's your response to this......??👀 Do you firmly support this? A. Huge Yes B. No

Today Updates 🇺🇸

131,441 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: James Comer says the House Ethics Committee will take over the investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar after a massive spike in her net worth was flagged in financial disclosures: “We’ve been informed in the last few hours that the Ethics Committee is probably going to have to be the committee that takes up that investigation. So we’re going to be writing a letter in the morning referring this to the Ethics Committee. It’s a simple investigation. There are two companies listed on Omar’s husband’s financial disclosure form. One was worth between $1,000 and $5,000, and then the very next year it was worth between $1 million and $5 million. Another one was worth, I think, $25,000, and the next year it was worth between $5 million and $30 million.”
1:21

BREAKING: James Comer says the House Ethics Committee will take over the investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar after a massive spike in her net worth was flagged in financial disclosures: “We’ve been informed in the last few hours that the Ethics Committee is probably going to have to be the committee that takes up that investigation. So we’re going to be writing a letter in the morning referring this to the Ethics Committee. It’s a simple investigation. There are two companies listed on Omar’s husband’s financial disclosure form. One was worth between $1,000 and $5,000, and then the very next year it was worth between $1 million and $5 million. Another one was worth, I think, $25,000, and the next year it was worth between $5 million and $30 million.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

709,936 views • 6 months ago

🚨 The 🇨🇦 Privy Council has revealed that due to his Brookfield conflicts of interest, Mark Carney was forced to sit out of dozens of government decisions including $150M for Canada’s airlines & a $510M loan to a Baffin Island mine. 👀 The ethics screen has been invoked 25 times. 🙄 "It has been an effective compliance measure to prevent conflicts of interest & protect the trust that is placed in him by the Canadian public.” - PM Office ⁉️ A prime minister that isn't involved in decisions because he would benefit but they are approved by his ministers anyways. Yeah, real effective.
0:43

🚨 The 🇨🇦 Privy Council has revealed that due to his Brookfield conflicts of interest, Mark Carney was forced to sit out of dozens of government decisions including $150M for Canada’s airlines & a $510M loan to a Baffin Island mine. 👀 The ethics screen has been invoked 25 times. 🙄 "It has been an effective compliance measure to prevent conflicts of interest & protect the trust that is placed in him by the Canadian public.” - PM Office ⁉️ A prime minister that isn't involved in decisions because he would benefit but they are approved by his ministers anyways. Yeah, real effective.

RMC86

48,519 views • 1 day ago

🔥🚨 JUST IN — Second Lady Usha Vance on the possibility of JD Vance running for President in 2028: Q: "JD is considered to be the top contender right now to run on the Republican ticket in the next presidential election. How do you feel about doing this on an even bigger scale?" USHA: "I know everyone is always curious about this, and my way of thinking about it is we just take things one step at a time." "Right now that step is he’s really focused on the midterms." "For me, it’s being focused on the things that I get to do during this four-year period, and my attitude is just to have an open mind and an open heart towards whatever might come next." "I’ve seen us adapt to all sorts of things and all sorts of changes, so I know whatever it is that he feels is the right thing for him to do, we’re going to have a good time doing it. We will make the best of it in the best possible way."
0:56

🔥🚨 JUST IN — Second Lady Usha Vance on the possibility of JD Vance running for President in 2028: Q: "JD is considered to be the top contender right now to run on the Republican ticket in the next presidential election. How do you feel about doing this on an even bigger scale?" USHA: "I know everyone is always curious about this, and my way of thinking about it is we just take things one step at a time." "Right now that step is he’s really focused on the midterms." "For me, it’s being focused on the things that I get to do during this four-year period, and my attitude is just to have an open mind and an open heart towards whatever might come next." "I’ve seen us adapt to all sorts of things and all sorts of changes, so I know whatever it is that he feels is the right thing for him to do, we’re going to have a good time doing it. We will make the best of it in the best possible way."

The Patriot Oasis™

90,349 views • 3 days ago

🚨Breaking News! 👀 🇨🇳💰🇨🇦 : Samuel Cooper informs the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy & Ethics about the numerous financial dealings between Mark Carney & CCP controlled entities. When Mark Carney was in charge of the Bank of England he worked to build strong ties with the CCP controlled Bank of China. Later when Mark Carney took over as the Chair of the Board for Brookfield, that company purchased real estate in China set aside to lure foreign investment into the CCP sphere of control. Carney went on to secure loans from the CCP controlled banking system for Brookfield, while the Chinese real estate market was failing. Mark Carney repeatedly travelled to China & had an official photo op with Xi before running to replace Justin Trudeau. 🗒️Carney has denied some allegations around his financial dealings with the CCP. 🚨We need an election now! No Prime Minister should have 103 investments with companies in a blind trust when we have so little information and clarity around how deep Mark Carney's financial ties are to the USA or China. See my previous video from today on the 103 investments in Carney's blind trust.
5:27

🚨Breaking News! 👀 🇨🇳💰🇨🇦 : Samuel Cooper informs the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy & Ethics about the numerous financial dealings between Mark Carney & CCP controlled entities. When Mark Carney was in charge of the Bank of England he worked to build strong ties with the CCP controlled Bank of China. Later when Mark Carney took over as the Chair of the Board for Brookfield, that company purchased real estate in China set aside to lure foreign investment into the CCP sphere of control. Carney went on to secure loans from the CCP controlled banking system for Brookfield, while the Chinese real estate market was failing. Mark Carney repeatedly travelled to China & had an official photo op with Xi before running to replace Justin Trudeau. 🗒️Carney has denied some allegations around his financial dealings with the CCP. 🚨We need an election now! No Prime Minister should have 103 investments with companies in a blind trust when we have so little information and clarity around how deep Mark Carney's financial ties are to the USA or China. See my previous video from today on the 103 investments in Carney's blind trust.

Bruce McGonigal

43,945 views • 10 months ago

🚨 Ethics bombshell at committee: Journalist Sam Cooper told MP Michael Barrett that Prime Minister Mark Carney’s former firm Brookfield held over $3 billion in China-linked real-estate and energy investments, involving tycoons tied to Beijing’s United Front networks and even backed by the Bank of China. Carney, then Brookfield chair, personally met Xi Jinping while the deals were being propped up. Now he’s PM. The question: where do his loyalties lie — Bay Street, Beijing, or Canadians?
6:02

🚨 Ethics bombshell at committee: Journalist Sam Cooper told MP Michael Barrett that Prime Minister Mark Carney’s former firm Brookfield held over $3 billion in China-linked real-estate and energy investments, involving tycoons tied to Beijing’s United Front networks and even backed by the Bank of China. Carney, then Brookfield chair, personally met Xi Jinping while the deals were being propped up. Now he’s PM. The question: where do his loyalties lie — Bay Street, Beijing, or Canadians?

Sheila Gunn Reid

105,309 views • 10 months ago

Carney superfan Russo on Carney's Italian getaway "I think it's a kind of a rookie political mistake." Harrison "There's not a lot of information coming forward from the Canadian government and Canadian sources." "So if premiers are in the dark and a lot of major sectors are in the dark and Canadians are in the dark, you know, and the prime minister is away, again, I don't think that it conveys the right message to Canadians that this is your number one issue." Kate Harrison
2:14

Carney superfan Russo on Carney's Italian getaway "I think it's a kind of a rookie political mistake." Harrison "There's not a lot of information coming forward from the Canadian government and Canadian sources." "So if premiers are in the dark and a lot of major sectors are in the dark and Canadians are in the dark, you know, and the prime minister is away, again, I don't think that it conveys the right message to Canadians that this is your number one issue." Kate Harrison

cbcwatcher

37,516 views • 18 days ago

"I don't understand how [Democrats] can see a million Americans die from dangerous research funded by the government, and not be upset about that." Sen. Rand Paul torches Senate Democrats for complaining about not having access to COVID records — hitting back saying he gave them access to the information that could shed light on government-funded research tied to the COVID-19 pandemic. "I have put all the records on an internet site for committee members for a year. Do you know how many Democrats looked at it?" "Not one of them asked for the password." "They don't seem to care about the truth. I think they want to defend the government more than they want to get to the truth."
0:41

"I don't understand how [Democrats] can see a million Americans die from dangerous research funded by the government, and not be upset about that." Sen. Rand Paul torches Senate Democrats for complaining about not having access to COVID records — hitting back saying he gave them access to the information that could shed light on government-funded research tied to the COVID-19 pandemic. "I have put all the records on an internet site for committee members for a year. Do you know how many Democrats looked at it?" "Not one of them asked for the password." "They don't seem to care about the truth. I think they want to defend the government more than they want to get to the truth."

Fox News

239,419 views • 1 month ago

This is for all the people in the arena ( your life, your career, your family ) who are doing it for them .. not for the validation of the crowd One of the great issues in our society right now is that people live their lives for outside validation, for the clicks, for the likes, for the followers, for the comments. This isn't just in social media. This is happening in the analog and real world too. Too many people are keeping up with the Joneses and worried about what people think about them. They worry about what people think about how much money they have, what school they go to, or even worse, what school their kids go to, and on and on and on … I will continue to make content with the hope it breaks someone out of the hamster wheel and that’s that ❤️❤️❤️❤️
0:37

This is for all the people in the arena ( your life, your career, your family ) who are doing it for them .. not for the validation of the crowd One of the great issues in our society right now is that people live their lives for outside validation, for the clicks, for the likes, for the followers, for the comments. This isn't just in social media. This is happening in the analog and real world too. Too many people are keeping up with the Joneses and worried about what people think about them. They worry about what people think about how much money they have, what school they go to, or even worse, what school their kids go to, and on and on and on … I will continue to make content with the hope it breaks someone out of the hamster wheel and that’s that ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Gary Vaynerchuk

19,814 views • 4 months ago

Great watch! Patrone "But if Flatt is in Tuscany and Carney were to stay at his residence in Tuscany, then that would possibly entail a matter for the Ethics Commissioner to either say yay or nay to, because that would be the acceptance of a gift." "And that would certainly explain why the Ethics Commissioner was consulted on this matter. But again, we don't know unless we eventually hear directly from, well, Carney on this." Warmington of the Ethics Commissioner, Konrad von Finckenstein "He works for us. And our job is to ask him a question of what it was that he had in front of him to determine why the Prime Minister, at a time when the country's on fire, went to Tuscany when everybody else is in food bank lines and can't afford to pay their mortgages." "...These guys are treating this country like it's theirs and the money's theirs and the plane is theirs." 💥MarcPatroneShow Joe Warmington Juno News
4:26

Great watch! Patrone "But if Flatt is in Tuscany and Carney were to stay at his residence in Tuscany, then that would possibly entail a matter for the Ethics Commissioner to either say yay or nay to, because that would be the acceptance of a gift." "And that would certainly explain why the Ethics Commissioner was consulted on this matter. But again, we don't know unless we eventually hear directly from, well, Carney on this." Warmington of the Ethics Commissioner, Konrad von Finckenstein "He works for us. And our job is to ask him a question of what it was that he had in front of him to determine why the Prime Minister, at a time when the country's on fire, went to Tuscany when everybody else is in food bank lines and can't afford to pay their mortgages." "...These guys are treating this country like it's theirs and the money's theirs and the plane is theirs." 💥MarcPatroneShow Joe Warmington Juno News

cbcwatcher

15,686 views • 17 days ago