Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"This is an existential battle. Whoever wields the most intelligence will build the most value" Mike Alfred on why the CapEx keeps climbing and nobody blinks "None of the hyperscalers have blinked. Every single one is increasing their CapEx budget every quarter, every year, for years now, and I... don't see how that stops." "This is an existential battle. Whoever wields the most intelligence will be able to build the most value in society, generate the most profitability, build the most sustainability into their business." "Nobody wants to be Blockbuster Video. You don't want to be written up as a Harvard business case study because you were on the board of a company that failed to invest in the future." "You sat on your hands and just milked your cash flow, and other companies ran an end-around your entire business and caused you to become obsolete."show more

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,084,690 subscribers

42,104 views • 11 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

15 Comments

The Wolf Of All Streets11 days ago

FT @mikealfred

Randy11 days ago

Mike Alfred is someone who makes bad analysis, berate others who dare to opine differently than him, and deletes his post when he's about to be held accountable. He's a clown.

Zelda Warrior11 days ago

Mike Alfred is must watch for anyone interested in listening to bad advice from a notorious retail scammer.

Gav11 days ago

I like Mike, he shit posts too much for my liking but hey....great calls!

(Coach K)11 days ago

Agreed

Dick Johnson Capital11 days ago

You know you’ve hit rock bottom when you have this grifter on. Wipe his Jizz off your chin.

₿ustin™️11 days ago

My two favorite 🐐s. 🤌

Lynor ⛓️11 days ago

nobody wants to become the next blockbuster

Eric Wallin11 days ago

I'm not even watching this one

Lynn11 days ago

100%

Occo11 days ago

building the future now

Abdullah Akram11 days ago

CapEx race intensifies

VincentScott11 days ago

Yeah, I can see where he’s coming from. In AI, nobody wants to be the company that waited too long.

Mei Yi Xing11 days ago

nobody wants to be the board member who skipped the AI arms race

cryptocompikbro11 days ago

Fear of becoming a Harvard case study is lowkey driving the global economy

Related Videos

Don't get caught up in capex noise or the concept that $SPCX is an AI and Space business. They're the worlds only sovereign AI company and early in building the what I believe will be the world's most valuable company.

Don't get caught up in capex noise or the concept that $SPCX is an AI and Space business. They're the worlds only sovereign AI company and early in building the what I believe will be the world's most valuable company.

Gene Munster

133,116 views • 1 month ago

"The purest form of ambition and most intense source of energy in the business is the founder CEO. Every next concentric circle of management beyond the founder CEO has the potential to be an order of magnitude drop off in intensity. And that is f*cking dangerous. You don't need to buffer people from the intensity of the CEO—you need to absolutely mirror that intensity. There is an infinite supply of people under you who will buffer other team members from the intensity of the demands. Your job is not to be one of those buffers. If you want to achieve greatness, if you want an extraordinary outcome, then you have to relentlessly inject energy at every single step. Teams will always optimize for local comfort over company outcomes. Your job as an executive, as a leader, is to fight that entropy tooth and nail, every single day." — Matt MacInnis (Matt MacInnis), Rippling CPO/COO

"The purest form of ambition and most intense source of energy in the business is the founder CEO. Every next concentric circle of management beyond the founder CEO has the potential to be an order of magnitude drop off in intensity. And that is f*cking dangerous. You don't need to buffer people from the intensity of the CEO—you need to absolutely mirror that intensity. There is an infinite supply of people under you who will buffer other team members from the intensity of the demands. Your job is not to be one of those buffers. If you want to achieve greatness, if you want an extraordinary outcome, then you have to relentlessly inject energy at every single step. Teams will always optimize for local comfort over company outcomes. Your job as an executive, as a leader, is to fight that entropy tooth and nail, every single day." — Matt MacInnis (Matt MacInnis), Rippling CPO/COO

Lenny Rachitsky

75,835 views • 8 months ago

ELON MUSK: "The Macrohard project over time actually will probably be our most important project, because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, their output is digital, so they don't actually make hardware so it should be possible to completely emulate any company where output is digital and this will usher an age of prosperity. This is a big deal and this is why the words Macrohard is painted on the roof of the training cluster, because that's what it's going to build."

ELON MUSK: "The Macrohard project over time actually will probably be our most important project, because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, their output is digital, so they don't actually make hardware so it should be possible to completely emulate any company where output is digital and this will usher an age of prosperity. This is a big deal and this is why the words Macrohard is painted on the roof of the training cluster, because that's what it's going to build."

DogeDesigner

49,012 views • 6 months ago

Michael Saylor just dropped one of the most controversial claims you’ll ever hear about building wealth — Buying a house is one of the dumbest ways to build wealth” SAYLOR: “I will tell you why you shouldn’t buy a house.” “There’s a 2% property tax on houses in Florida… every 36 years, you actually pay the cost of the house in tax to the government.” “You’re taking on a massive tax load and you’re taking on a maintenance load. Not a very good store of value.” “Most people are told that the way to build wealth… is to buy a house… Is that a good strategy? … It crushes you to death.” “The average person shouldn’t have to be a real estate expert… Why shouldn’t the typical person just be able to take their money, put it into an asset which appreciates 15% a year, and they don’t have to worry about it?”

Michael Saylor just dropped one of the most controversial claims you’ll ever hear about building wealth — Buying a house is one of the dumbest ways to build wealth” SAYLOR: “I will tell you why you shouldn’t buy a house.” “There’s a 2% property tax on houses in Florida… every 36 years, you actually pay the cost of the house in tax to the government.” “You’re taking on a massive tax load and you’re taking on a maintenance load. Not a very good store of value.” “Most people are told that the way to build wealth… is to buy a house… Is that a good strategy? … It crushes you to death.” “The average person shouldn’t have to be a real estate expert… Why shouldn’t the typical person just be able to take their money, put it into an asset which appreciates 15% a year, and they don’t have to worry about it?”

Defiant Ghost

121,042 views • 1 month ago

Bill Ackman manages 25 billion dollars and just said the thing every long-term investor is most afraid of out loud. The risk of two people in a garage destroying your company has gone up enormously, and he spends most of his time on that one problem. That should change how you look at every business you own. His logic is simple. This is the greatest era in history to build a company. There is unlimited access to compute. There is unlimited access to capital. There is incredible talent everywhere. Most people hear that and feel optimistic. Ackman hears it and sees a threat. Because every one of those advantages is available to the people trying to kill your company too. The same tools that make it easy to build make it easy to disrupt. His exact words: the probability of your being disrupted has gone up enormously. So the hardest job he has as an investor is not finding cheap stocks. It is figuring out what cannot be destroyed. That is where he spends most of his time now. Not on upside. On survival. Everyone is asking which companies AI will make. Ackman is asking which ones it will break. The cheapest stock in the world means nothing if two people in a garage are already building the thing that ends it. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Bill Ackman manages 25 billion dollars and just said the thing every long-term investor is most afraid of out loud. The risk of two people in a garage destroying your company has gone up enormously, and he spends most of his time on that one problem. That should change how you look at every business you own. His logic is simple. This is the greatest era in history to build a company. There is unlimited access to compute. There is unlimited access to capital. There is incredible talent everywhere. Most people hear that and feel optimistic. Ackman hears it and sees a threat. Because every one of those advantages is available to the people trying to kill your company too. The same tools that make it easy to build make it easy to disrupt. His exact words: the probability of your being disrupted has gone up enormously. So the hardest job he has as an investor is not finding cheap stocks. It is figuring out what cannot be destroyed. That is where he spends most of his time now. Not on upside. On survival. Everyone is asking which companies AI will make. Ackman is asking which ones it will break. The cheapest stock in the world means nothing if two people in a garage are already building the thing that ends it. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Ihtesham Ali

20,682 views • 2 months ago

“The Macrohard project probably be our most important project because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, they are... their output is digital. So they don't actually make hardware. So it should be possible to completely emulate any company where the output is digital. And this will usher in an age of prosperity the likes of which we can barely imagine at this point. You need to imagine to imagine it. So this is a big deal, and this is why the words Macrohard are painted on the roof of the training cluster because that's what it's going to build.”

“The Macrohard project probably be our most important project because what we're talking about is emulation of entire human companies. So when you look at the most valuable companies in the world, they are... their output is digital. So they don't actually make hardware. So it should be possible to completely emulate any company where the output is digital. And this will usher in an age of prosperity the likes of which we can barely imagine at this point. You need to imagine to imagine it. So this is a big deal, and this is why the words Macrohard are painted on the roof of the training cluster because that's what it's going to build.”

Dima Zeniuk

41,511 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk on where people should invest: "I don't really buy stocks. I don't look for things to invest in. I just try to build things and then there happens to be stock of the company that I built, but I don't have like a portfolio or anything; Google is gonna be pretty valuable in the future. They've laid the ground work for an immense amount of value creation from an AI standpoint. Nvidia is obvious at this point. There's an argument that companies that do AI and robotics, and maybe spaceflight, are going to be overwhelmingly almost all of the value."

Elon Musk on where people should invest: "I don't really buy stocks. I don't look for things to invest in. I just try to build things and then there happens to be stock of the company that I built, but I don't have like a portfolio or anything; Google is gonna be pretty valuable in the future. They've laid the ground work for an immense amount of value creation from an AI standpoint. Nvidia is obvious at this point. There's an argument that companies that do AI and robotics, and maybe spaceflight, are going to be overwhelmingly almost all of the value."

Sawyer Merritt

4,473,861 views • 9 months ago

Biggest announcement of my life: I have raised pre-seed funding from 021T, Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross , and Devon Triplett to build an AI agent that will change the world The biggest issue with AI is it is creating incredible value but for only a small group of people Most people hate AI and don't use it I have built Henry Intelligent Machines (HIM) to solve this HIM is a personal swarm of AI agents autonomously creating economic value for you 24/7 Right now as we speak HIM is collecting data across thousands of websites autonomously 24/7/365 They're hunting for challenges to solve at all times When you use Henry, he will deeply research you and get to know you. Then based on the thousands of opportunities it has in its database, find the value generating opportunities that most closely match your interests, skills, assets, and expertise Henry and its swarm will then proceed to build those micro-businesses out for you You will have complete control over the swarm. Reviewing and approving all work. Editing where you find appropriate. You give Henry a budget, then it hunts and autonomously creates value Say you have an expertise in vibe coding tools and Henry discovers there's no vibe coding guides on Gumroad. It will take your expertise, build drafts for a guide, run it by you, post with your approval, then use your budget to get customers Say you're into AI and speak Portuguese Henry will go through the Portuguese AI education market, see there are no educational products in that language, then create a full AI educational business in Portuguese Most people hate AI. This is because they get 0 value from it, see their friends getting laid off, and become scared HIM is the antidote to this. HIM allows ANYONE to get value from AI. HIM will allow anyone to get access to the trillions of dollars of value that are up for grabs in the new AI world. To ensure Henry creates value and not slop, this will be an extremely slow rollout We will be letting people into HIM 1 by 1. Working with them hands on to ensure Henry only builds real value for them, then expanding from there. If you'd like to be one of the early users of Henry, feel free to sign up at the link below. Forward.

Biggest announcement of my life: I have raised pre-seed funding from 021T, Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross , and Devon Triplett to build an AI agent that will change the world The biggest issue with AI is it is creating incredible value but for only a small group of people Most people hate AI and don't use it I have built Henry Intelligent Machines (HIM) to solve this HIM is a personal swarm of AI agents autonomously creating economic value for you 24/7 Right now as we speak HIM is collecting data across thousands of websites autonomously 24/7/365 They're hunting for challenges to solve at all times When you use Henry, he will deeply research you and get to know you. Then based on the thousands of opportunities it has in its database, find the value generating opportunities that most closely match your interests, skills, assets, and expertise Henry and its swarm will then proceed to build those micro-businesses out for you You will have complete control over the swarm. Reviewing and approving all work. Editing where you find appropriate. You give Henry a budget, then it hunts and autonomously creates value Say you have an expertise in vibe coding tools and Henry discovers there's no vibe coding guides on Gumroad. It will take your expertise, build drafts for a guide, run it by you, post with your approval, then use your budget to get customers Say you're into AI and speak Portuguese Henry will go through the Portuguese AI education market, see there are no educational products in that language, then create a full AI educational business in Portuguese Most people hate AI. This is because they get 0 value from it, see their friends getting laid off, and become scared HIM is the antidote to this. HIM allows ANYONE to get value from AI. HIM will allow anyone to get access to the trillions of dollars of value that are up for grabs in the new AI world. To ensure Henry creates value and not slop, this will be an extremely slow rollout We will be letting people into HIM 1 by 1. Working with them hands on to ensure Henry only builds real value for them, then expanding from there. If you'd like to be one of the early users of Henry, feel free to sign up at the link below. Forward.

Alex Finn

508,778 views • 5 months ago

The triple decker might be the most Massachusetts thing there is. It's also illegal to build in almost every city and town. Look around your block. Most of what you see couldn't be built today. In Cambridge, 85% of our buildings were illegal until I helped fix it last year.

The triple decker might be the most Massachusetts thing there is. It's also illegal to build in almost every city and town. Look around your block. Most of what you see couldn't be built today. In Cambridge, 85% of our buildings were illegal until I helped fix it last year.

Burhan Azeem, Cambridge Vice Mayor

242,680 views • 3 months ago

Mark Cuban just told every software company on Earth they’re already dead. The people inside them are still building roadmaps. Cuban: “Software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Every SaaS company was built on one bet. Software stays rigid. Humans stay adaptable. You learn the tool. You bend to it. You pay for someone else’s version of your solution. AI just inverted that. The tool bends to you or it dies. Cuban: “33 million companies aren’t going to have AI budgets, aren’t going to have AI experts.” 33 million businesses feel something shifting beneath them. None can name it. The distance between what AI can do and what small companies can access is the most mispriced gap in markets today. Not a technology problem. A translation problem. Cuban: “Learn all you can about AI but learn more on how to implement them in companies.” Everyone is racing to build intelligence. Almost nobody is racing to deploy it where the pain is deepest. The person who walks into a 40-person company and rewires their entire operation captures more value than the team that trained the model. Understanding pain is now worth more than building intelligence. Cuban: “Every single job available for kids coming out of school because every single company needs that.” The most important career of the next decade has no title. No degree path. No university knows it needs to exist yet. It belongs to whoever learns two languages fluently. The language of a business that can’t articulate what’s breaking. And the language of an AI that doesn’t know where to aim. 33 million companies. Zero translators. Whoever arrives first doesn’t enter a market. They create one.

Mark Cuban just told every software company on Earth they’re already dead. The people inside them are still building roadmaps. Cuban: “Software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Every SaaS company was built on one bet. Software stays rigid. Humans stay adaptable. You learn the tool. You bend to it. You pay for someone else’s version of your solution. AI just inverted that. The tool bends to you or it dies. Cuban: “33 million companies aren’t going to have AI budgets, aren’t going to have AI experts.” 33 million businesses feel something shifting beneath them. None can name it. The distance between what AI can do and what small companies can access is the most mispriced gap in markets today. Not a technology problem. A translation problem. Cuban: “Learn all you can about AI but learn more on how to implement them in companies.” Everyone is racing to build intelligence. Almost nobody is racing to deploy it where the pain is deepest. The person who walks into a 40-person company and rewires their entire operation captures more value than the team that trained the model. Understanding pain is now worth more than building intelligence. Cuban: “Every single job available for kids coming out of school because every single company needs that.” The most important career of the next decade has no title. No degree path. No university knows it needs to exist yet. It belongs to whoever learns two languages fluently. The language of a business that can’t articulate what’s breaking. And the language of an AI that doesn’t know where to aim. 33 million companies. Zero translators. Whoever arrives first doesn’t enter a market. They create one.

Dustin

473,702 views • 2 months ago

🚨 She absolutely nails it! “I will remind you that evangelicals donate the most money to charity every year, that we volunteer the most service hours, that we adopt the most children out of foster care. And so when you say that evangelicals are a cancer, you are saying that the most generous, charitable people in this country are cancerous. What you're actually saying is that this group is cancerous because you don't like our politics. We are also the most conservative group in the country, and you don't like that we don't outsource our compassion to the government like you do.”

🚨 She absolutely nails it! “I will remind you that evangelicals donate the most money to charity every year, that we volunteer the most service hours, that we adopt the most children out of foster care. And so when you say that evangelicals are a cancer, you are saying that the most generous, charitable people in this country are cancerous. What you're actually saying is that this group is cancerous because you don't like our politics. We are also the most conservative group in the country, and you don't like that we don't outsource our compassion to the government like you do.”

Gunther Eagleman™

268,966 views • 7 months ago

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the brutal truth about who actually makes money in AI (and why it's not who you think): Aravind argues that the real value in AI comes from orchestration. He points to products like Codex, Claude Code, and Perplexity Computer: "What is that? It's an orchestration system. It takes a model, pairs it with an agent harness." And what is an agent harness? "The simplest way of describing it is like rules for how the agent loop should run. What are all the skills and sub-agents and connectors and tools it accesses? Without the harness, you don't necessarily capture and convert the intrinsic intelligence in the model into valuable output tokens." This leads to a blunt conclusion about who has a real business in AI, and who doesn't: "If you're literally just a reseller of model tokens, you have no business, because the model will get commoditized. So even if you're a model builder, you don't have a business. As an infra layer, you have some business on serving those output tokens. But as an application layer or model builder, you don't really have a business if you're just a reseller of tokens that come directly out of the model." So where does the value accrue? "You have a business if you know how to take the model, ground it in valuable context, orchestrate it with a really good agent harness, connected to the right set of tools and connectors (whether it's personal connectors or business connectors) and provide the experience to people in one single unified system." Aravind Srinivas then explains Perplexity's specific edge: Beyond orchestrating across tools, files, and connectors, they also orchestrate across models. "That is the differentiation that Anthropic and OpenAI cannot claim, because you wouldn't find GPT-5 inside the Claude Code harness. You wouldn't find Claude Opus inside the Codex harness. These are competing with each other. Whereas you would find both these models inside Perplexity Computer." Why does this matter? Because it all comes down to power. In Aravind's framing, the fundamental cost driver in AI is watts (the one input nobody can subsidize except the government). "Whoever provides the most valuable output tokens with the least amount of power expended to produce them generates the greatest value to the end user, has the most pricing power, has the most value. That is the orchestration problem to solve." His conclusion: "The one single most important metric in AI is token value per watt per user."

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the brutal truth about who actually makes money in AI (and why it's not who you think): Aravind argues that the real value in AI comes from orchestration. He points to products like Codex, Claude Code, and Perplexity Computer: "What is that? It's an orchestration system. It takes a model, pairs it with an agent harness." And what is an agent harness? "The simplest way of describing it is like rules for how the agent loop should run. What are all the skills and sub-agents and connectors and tools it accesses? Without the harness, you don't necessarily capture and convert the intrinsic intelligence in the model into valuable output tokens." This leads to a blunt conclusion about who has a real business in AI, and who doesn't: "If you're literally just a reseller of model tokens, you have no business, because the model will get commoditized. So even if you're a model builder, you don't have a business. As an infra layer, you have some business on serving those output tokens. But as an application layer or model builder, you don't really have a business if you're just a reseller of tokens that come directly out of the model." So where does the value accrue? "You have a business if you know how to take the model, ground it in valuable context, orchestrate it with a really good agent harness, connected to the right set of tools and connectors (whether it's personal connectors or business connectors) and provide the experience to people in one single unified system." Aravind Srinivas then explains Perplexity's specific edge: Beyond orchestrating across tools, files, and connectors, they also orchestrate across models. "That is the differentiation that Anthropic and OpenAI cannot claim, because you wouldn't find GPT-5 inside the Claude Code harness. You wouldn't find Claude Opus inside the Codex harness. These are competing with each other. Whereas you would find both these models inside Perplexity Computer." Why does this matter? Because it all comes down to power. In Aravind's framing, the fundamental cost driver in AI is watts (the one input nobody can subsidize except the government). "Whoever provides the most valuable output tokens with the least amount of power expended to produce them generates the greatest value to the end user, has the most pricing power, has the most value. That is the orchestration problem to solve." His conclusion: "The one single most important metric in AI is token value per watt per user."

Big Brain AI

42,319 views • 1 month ago

The Money Making Expert: The Exact Formula For Turning $100 Into $100k Per Month! 10x Your Income Without Working Harder! The Waiting List Hack That Will Make You Millions! Daniel Priestley is an award-winning serial entrepreneur who has built and sold several successful businesses and written 5 books on starting and scaling businesses. He knows just about everything when it comes to the world of business and is here today to share all… In this conversation Daniel and I talk about 👇🏽 💥 Why failing is the answer to success. 💥 How to build multi-million pound businesses. 💥 How to take your thoughts from an idea to reality. 💥 Why sales is one of the most important skills you could ever learn. 💥 Where and how to invest your money. This conversation is one that my 16 year old self would have loved to be able to hear. So, wherever you are on your entrepreneur journey, trust me when I say there is something in this episode for you. Open you notes page, and get ready… OUT NOW -

The Money Making Expert: The Exact Formula For Turning $100 Into $100k Per Month! 10x Your Income Without Working Harder! The Waiting List Hack That Will Make You Millions! Daniel Priestley is an award-winning serial entrepreneur who has built and sold several successful businesses and written 5 books on starting and scaling businesses. He knows just about everything when it comes to the world of business and is here today to share all… In this conversation Daniel and I talk about 👇🏽 💥 Why failing is the answer to success. 💥 How to build multi-million pound businesses. 💥 How to take your thoughts from an idea to reality. 💥 Why sales is one of the most important skills you could ever learn. 💥 Where and how to invest your money. This conversation is one that my 16 year old self would have loved to be able to hear. So, wherever you are on your entrepreneur journey, trust me when I say there is something in this episode for you. Open you notes page, and get ready… OUT NOW -

Steven Bartlett

38,972 views • 2 years ago

OpenAI does not want to become the application layer of AI; it wants to be the platform that other application companies build on. "I think we should be more of a platform company than a product company. We will build products, of course. What I think most people want is a sort of single interface to their own personal, or their company's, AGI that can kind of help them with whatever they need, and then the ability, with an API, to build anything they want on top of it. That is the platform that we should offer to the world. We're going to sell great AI at every point on the cost-performance curve. We will be the best. You want really high-end AI to discover science? That's great. You want really inexpensive AI to do a massive amount of work that maybe doesn't require genius-level intelligence? We've got you covered there too." - Sam Altman on David Senra podcast (full video in the quoted tweet)

OpenAI does not want to become the application layer of AI; it wants to be the platform that other application companies build on. "I think we should be more of a platform company than a product company. We will build products, of course. What I think most people want is a sort of single interface to their own personal, or their company's, AGI that can kind of help them with whatever they need, and then the ability, with an API, to build anything they want on top of it. That is the platform that we should offer to the world. We're going to sell great AI at every point on the cost-performance curve. We will be the best. You want really high-end AI to discover science? That's great. You want really inexpensive AI to do a massive amount of work that maybe doesn't require genius-level intelligence? We've got you covered there too." - Sam Altman on David Senra podcast (full video in the quoted tweet)

Rohan Paul

25,077 views • 21 days ago

Today is Tesla 2nd Qtr Financial Results day and CAPEX along with cash flow and cash balance might be the story you will hear the most about … and for good reason. The company is building all of the infrastructure needed to be able to offer AI, humanoid robots, advanced AI chips, AI training & compute and much more … most of which everyone will be talking about in 2028 … and you can see all of this happening today. Check out these views current progress with the new Optimus factory on the north end of Giga Texas today!

Today is Tesla 2nd Qtr Financial Results day and CAPEX along with cash flow and cash balance might be the story you will hear the most about … and for good reason. The company is building all of the infrastructure needed to be able to offer AI, humanoid robots, advanced AI chips, AI training & compute and much more … most of which everyone will be talking about in 2028 … and you can see all of this happening today. Check out these views current progress with the new Optimus factory on the north end of Giga Texas today!

Joe Tegtmeyer 🚀 🤠🛸😎

59,744 views • 1 month ago

Peter Thiel: "Competition is for losers" "Competition is for losers, which got people's attention, because we normally believe the opposite. We believe that the losers are the people who don't compete intensely enough. You're a loser if you're not competitive. But what if you're a loser because you're too obsessed with competing? If you're too focused on competing, maybe you're losing sight of what's really important." Thiel explains the distinction most people miss: "The most important distinction in business that people don't talk about enough is that there are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive, and there are companies that have monopolies. If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur, it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." He frames this as an unconventional truth: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away."

Peter Thiel: "Competition is for losers" "Competition is for losers, which got people's attention, because we normally believe the opposite. We believe that the losers are the people who don't compete intensely enough. You're a loser if you're not competitive. But what if you're a loser because you're too obsessed with competing? If you're too focused on competing, maybe you're losing sight of what's really important." Thiel explains the distinction most people miss: "The most important distinction in business that people don't talk about enough is that there are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive, and there are companies that have monopolies. If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur, it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." He frames this as an unconventional truth: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away."

Jaynit

55,406 views • 5 months ago

"I think we're at a point where you absolutely can be a one-person company. And it's joyful." Here's Ryan explaining why he went from CEO with 100 employees to a solo founder building with AI: "You don't have to build a very big business to have an amazing life. You cash flow, you build wealth, and the thing is—you control your time. People don't understand the value of controlling your time." 📌 Watch Ryan explain how anyone can build production apps with AI using his 3-file system:

"I think we're at a point where you absolutely can be a one-person company. And it's joyful." Here's Ryan explaining why he went from CEO with 100 employees to a solo founder building with AI: "You don't have to build a very big business to have an amazing life. You cash flow, you build wealth, and the thing is—you control your time. People don't understand the value of controlling your time." 📌 Watch Ryan explain how anyone can build production apps with AI using his 3-file system:

Peter Yang

89,248 views • 11 months ago

If you want to be a successful entrepreneur, start by proving people outside your friends and family are willing to pay for your product. Focus on generating revenue, because without sales, nothing else matters. Every day, identify the three most important things that move your business forward and don’t let distractions get in the way. Most importantly, value execution over vision. Great ideas are everywhere, but the entrepreneurs and employees who consistently get things done are the ones who build lasting businesses.

If you want to be a successful entrepreneur, start by proving people outside your friends and family are willing to pay for your product. Focus on generating revenue, because without sales, nothing else matters. Every day, identify the three most important things that move your business forward and don’t let distractions get in the way. Most importantly, value execution over vision. Great ideas are everywhere, but the entrepreneurs and employees who consistently get things done are the ones who build lasting businesses.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

27,257 views • 2 months ago

call me crazy but the first AI agent most companies should build is an autonomous analyst. you can build one using Kimi K3. it watches your competitors while you sleep, remembers every move, and wakes your team with the launches, pricing changes, and positioning shifts they need to act on. don't bookmark this if it crosses your timeline. paste the full article into Kimi and tell it to build the first version for your market.

call me crazy but the first AI agent most companies should build is an autonomous analyst. you can build one using Kimi K3. it watches your competitors while you sleep, remembers every move, and wakes your team with the launches, pricing changes, and positioning shifts they need to act on. don't bookmark this if it crosses your timeline. paste the full article into Kimi and tell it to build the first version for your market.

J.B.

1,078,890 views • 26 days ago

Parents and kids!!! Please commit to schools where your actually wanted and where you will be pushed to be better. Not where the most NIL is or where the biggest and most prestigious school is!! You will make it harder on yourselves in the long run!! If u like that and stay the journey you will be found!!!

Parents and kids!!! Please commit to schools where your actually wanted and where you will be pushed to be better. Not where the most NIL is or where the biggest and most prestigious school is!! You will make it harder on yourselves in the long run!! If u like that and stay the journey you will be found!!!

Austin Rivers

126,997 views • 1 year ago