Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🎬This is Ann-Margret’s 1961 screen test where she performs “Mack the Knife.”She was only 20 years old here, and you can already see the energy, charisma, and fearless attitude that would make her a star. The performance is raw and full of personality — she’s clearly trying to show...

208,996 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Happy 86th birthday, Julie Christie! John Schlesinger on the mysterious power of actors like Julie Christie: "Interviewer: Julie Christie has a small part, and yet it leaves much more of an impact than the space it occupies in the film. What gives some actors such screen presence? Schlesinger: I think there is a mysterious process that goes on between a person and that piece of glass which is the lens. And I understand why a camera is considered an evil eye by orthodox Jews. I think it does take something from the person. Quite often after six takes or so, when you've said, "Right, let's move on," an actor will say, "Well, that was the one, wasn't it?" I'd say, "Well, I don't know until I see the dailies. Until I see it up on the screen. I don't know.'' And that's true. There is something mysterious about the whole process and how a personality is seen on film. There are actors who work because of their personality and who aren't that versatile as performers. The reason they're popular and famous is that there is something about them as people that makes them stars. And they aren't that different in different parts. Alec Guinness was a prime example of the opposite, of somebody who didn't exploit his own personality, whatever that was, and gave some wonderful screen performances. Interviewer: Where would you put Julie Christie in that respect? Schlesinger: I think Julie became a very much better actress with experience. I don't think she ever particularly wanted to be come a star. Interviewer: She's uncomfortable with it? Schlesinger: I adore her, and she's wonderful and original, and there are many kindnesses that I remember her doing. But I think Julie was uncomfortable having to live up to being a star. She got better at it the more big films she did, but I don't know that she really was ever very comfortable being a star." ("Conversations with John Schlesinger", Ian Buruma, 2006) Clip from: Billy Liar (1963) Director: John Schlesinger

DepressedBergman

17,434 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Freen is… Fuang thinks she’s very detailed by nature. I have to say she’s very very detailed. She’s sensitive and sensitive to her surroundings. That’s a personal trait that impacts one’s acting (she talked about this in the start.) she cares tremendously about people around her. For example, I’m talking to Becky in a corner and Freen is doing makeup in another. But she knows what we’re talking about, takes in the details, and turns to congratulate me. She’s very in the present. She’s in the moment with everything all the time. Therefore her ‘detailed’ reactions/acting that we see, it’s because she absorbes everything around her. And our eyes are the window to our hearts. So this is the case of a personal trait affecting one’s acting. That’s one thing. More importantly, along the way, Freen found a way to enhance / add to that. Did Fuang helped bring her there? Maybe or maybe I don’t dare to claim that. For example, in some scenes she can do them well already, but I helped add in more details. I told her your character didn’t just hear that.. listen carefully, there are this and that details. And when she saw/realized that there were more than what she was initially aware of-like from 70% to 90%-just that, her acting will be even more detailed. Your eyes will show what you see or become aware of. If you ask, that’s all Fuang added on. The rest, she was able to do it on her own. This I was I meant by saying that the job of an acting coach is to pull out each actor’s skill. Because she could already it. It’s just that at that very moment, there wasn’t anyone to help her pull out more of her talent/maximize it. Something like that.

panpan

54,785 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Obedience is a sacred pledge. An offering of self. Not an abandoning of self. Nor a selfish act. A submissive who obeys without discernment is not powerful. They are pliable. A submissive who obeys with reverence, discernment and clarity iis conscious of the value he brings and chooses who to offer this value to. And you make that choice, because you trust in the leadership and influence and benevolence of the person you choose to obey. The more obedient and devoted a submissive is, the more they allow their Mistress to fully embody her Dominance, the more they amplify her Divine Feminine Power. Because by obeying her, you showcase that her words and commands matter, that you trust them. Which in turn makes her feel safe and encouraged to assert herself and command with confidence. But there is a difference between seeking to find a Mıstress from a place of need and desperation.. And from a desire. Which is rooted in the energy of giving, not taking. Here are two questions to ask yourself as a sub, seeking this type of dynamic: Are your fantasies more about what she can do TO you (for you) or about what you can do for her? Are you fantasizing about being used, or about being of use? Real obedience is an act of devotional selflessness. It is obsequious. Performative obedience is where you become a slv to your own desires... a sycophant who selects someone to play out what you want, for your own personal benefit alone. [Exerpt from Sacred submission]
1:55

Sensitive content

Obedience is a sacred pledge. An offering of self. Not an abandoning of self. Nor a selfish act. A submissive who obeys without discernment is not powerful. They are pliable. A submissive who obeys with reverence, discernment and clarity iis conscious of the value he brings and chooses who to offer this value to. And you make that choice, because you trust in the leadership and influence and benevolence of the person you choose to obey. The more obedient and devoted a submissive is, the more they allow their Mistress to fully embody her Dominance, the more they amplify her Divine Feminine Power. Because by obeying her, you showcase that her words and commands matter, that you trust them. Which in turn makes her feel safe and encouraged to assert herself and command with confidence. But there is a difference between seeking to find a Mıstress from a place of need and desperation.. And from a desire. Which is rooted in the energy of giving, not taking. Here are two questions to ask yourself as a sub, seeking this type of dynamic: Are your fantasies more about what she can do TO you (for you) or about what you can do for her? Are you fantasizing about being used, or about being of use? Real obedience is an act of devotional selflessness. It is obsequious. Performative obedience is where you become a slv to your own desires... a sycophant who selects someone to play out what you want, for your own personal benefit alone. [Exerpt from Sacred submission]

Ms. Malissia

39,373 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Last week, I saw a creature from this place saying this about Freen:"Freen on the other hand, excels in her natural charm and flirtatious screen presence, which remains one of her strongest assets. However, there has been little noticeable progression in her acting range since her previous series" And I'm glad that this human being noticed her charm. Freen truly has natural charm and charisma. And that is conveyed to the audience, which makes her characters more authentic. But I understood that your goal was simply to reduce her to that. So I compiled her many brilliant moments from each of her last three GL series, capturing her nuances. Let me say this: they are three characters with different personalities. A cold CEO with little emotional expressiveness. Khun Pin, delicate and reserved. Wayo, laid-back and protective (a character that requires a lot of her charm😌), and having read the books, I can say that Freen fulfilled the essence of each character exactly. She brought them to life exactly as they needed to be. Her strength as an actress is remarkable. What truly sets her apart is her ability to convey emotions through small gestures, looks, and nuances in her performance, making her characters more authentic and convincing. We can see how much Freen, since Gap, has always sought to deliver her very best as an actress. It is also evident how proud she is of TLP, a series that not only addressed themes she identifies with as a woman and artist, but also contributed to her growth and evolution in the emotional construction of her characters. This maturity can be seen more and more in her performances, especially in the realistic and sensitive way she expresses emotions. Her presence on screen is not limited to charisma or beauty alone, but also to her talent for giving depth to the roles she plays, making each character feel truly alive to the audience. Freen recently said in her interview for VogueTaiwan that she wants to continue challenging herself more and more as an actress. And I can hardly wait to keep being captivated by her charm on screen and to discover the new lives, stories, and emotions that she will bring to life through every character she portrays.🙌 #srchafreen‌

Bruna/GIRLFREEN✨

12,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Passing Tests and Making Love This clip from We Were Soldiers (2002) captures beautiful sexual chemistry in a loving but high-intensity marriage. She tests him psychologically, he tests her physically, and they both pass with flying colors. First, she tests him. The religious difference is likely a potential sore spot. Being respected by his children is important to him. He's being a good father overall. And so the jab: "I'm marveling that you can see stubbornness from your children and see it comes from anybody but you." He makes it clear that he enjoys the banter, and welcomes her probing his weakness as an invitation for serious flirtation! He's unthreatened. Now he tests her. "I'll give you something to marvel at! He's a wild man!" He knocks the book out of her hands and jumps on her. If there isn't a huge amount of trust in a marriage, this sort of thing can end very badly. A wife can feel unsafe, even assaulted. But instead, she squeals like she's being taken on a rollercoaster ride, and smirks and playfights with him. She's signaling that she's unthreatened. And then we cut and give the couple some privacy. What follows is for them alone. The moral of the story for men? It may be tempting to want her to pull her psychological punches. He could have gotten sullen and angry, and argued the point. "Honey, I'm trying to do the best I can here - a little encouragement would be nice!" Enough responses like that, and she WILL pull her punches over time. But that's not where the relational prizes are! Instead, learn to welcome these tests. Invite them. Do whatever work you need to do in your own soul so that you're not looking to her for validation but are confident in your own dignity. And then display generous joyful strength.

Giff Lasta

173,706 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr