Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This is crazy… In 2000, there was a study done famously called the “Williams Study” — which 99.9% of all studies Cite regarding the “Safety” of Glyphosate Just last month, that study was retracted because it was found that Monsanto executives wrote it… wow Clip Full Interview

MJTruthUltra

648,043 subscribers

278,102 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A recent study found glyphosate causes 10+ cancers in rats at “safe” doses. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

A recent study found glyphosate causes 10+ cancers in rats at “safe” doses. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

202,509 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

22,147 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just DERAILED THOUSANDS of lawsuits against Monsanto for glyphosate causing cancer. In a 7-2 ruling, they sided with Monsanto and BLOCKED cancer victims from suing over missing cancer warnings. This is a GRAVE MISTAKE. Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just DERAILED THOUSANDS of lawsuits against Monsanto for glyphosate causing cancer. In a 7-2 ruling, they sided with Monsanto and BLOCKED cancer victims from suing over missing cancer warnings. This is a GRAVE MISTAKE. Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

120,650 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kelly Ryerson just announced a major win against Big Chem. The EPA can no longer rely on the fake study they used for decades to defend glyphosate. “I have some great news from the glyphosate cancer world.” “There is a paper that was published in 2000. It is called the Williams paper. This study has been relied on by the EPA for two decades to claim that glyphosate does not cause cancer.” “Well, during the cancer litigation, the lawyers found that that paper was actually ghostwritten by Monsanto and that it was fraudulent science.” “We've been telling the EPA, ‘you shouldn't rely on this paper,’ but they still have been.” “That paper was just retracted from the academic journal where it was originally published for exactly these reasons, that it was fraudulent science.” “So now the EPA will not be able to rely on this foundational piece that they always point to to claim that glyphosate does not cause cancer.” “So that is a win today in the pesticide world.”

Kelly Ryerson just announced a major win against Big Chem. The EPA can no longer rely on the fake study they used for decades to defend glyphosate. “I have some great news from the glyphosate cancer world.” “There is a paper that was published in 2000. It is called the Williams paper. This study has been relied on by the EPA for two decades to claim that glyphosate does not cause cancer.” “Well, during the cancer litigation, the lawyers found that that paper was actually ghostwritten by Monsanto and that it was fraudulent science.” “We've been telling the EPA, ‘you shouldn't rely on this paper,’ but they still have been.” “That paper was just retracted from the academic journal where it was originally published for exactly these reasons, that it was fraudulent science.” “So now the EPA will not be able to rely on this foundational piece that they always point to to claim that glyphosate does not cause cancer.” “So that is a win today in the pesticide world.”

MAHA Action

28,250 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

.Sonia Elijah: "You have a very infamous study that was published in The Lancet, this is the main study on why Hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and it can cause heart attacks, cardiac arrests. And it was this study, it was based on 96,000 patients. So it had a huge data set. But this data set all came out of a small company, an unknown company from Chicago called Surgisphere. And it was proven that all the data was faked. So that study actually had to get withdrawn. But even though it was withdrawn, it was still pushed as hydroxychloroquine is dangerous."

.Sonia Elijah: "You have a very infamous study that was published in The Lancet, this is the main study on why Hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and it can cause heart attacks, cardiac arrests. And it was this study, it was based on 96,000 patients. So it had a huge data set. But this data set all came out of a small company, an unknown company from Chicago called Surgisphere. And it was proven that all the data was faked. So that study actually had to get withdrawn. But even though it was withdrawn, it was still pushed as hydroxychloroquine is dangerous."

Tom Nelson

21,934 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

BOOM: Secretary Kennedy just demolished big pharma…again. Every news station has reported on a brand new Danish study supposedly showing that Tylenol does not cause autism. RFK Jr: “The study is a garbage study. It should be retracted. The study took a million, the medical records, of a million danish women and it compared women who got Tylenol during pregnancy to people who did not. The problem is, the way it determined whether they got Tylenol during pregnancy was by prescriptions. So only 2% of the people in the study got Tylenol during pregnancy - according to the end point.” “Tylenol is available over the counter. Many of you have taken Tylenol, but very few of you have ever gotten a prescription. 50% of the people in Denmark, we know from other studies, actually took Tylenol during pregnancy. So the study was comparing women who took Tylenol during pregnancy to women who took Tylenol during pregnancy. It was a garbage in, garbage out study. The industry has the capacity to generate these studies all the time and it’s fraudulent.”

Anna Matson

233,182 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

MS NOW reports: There is not a legitimate scientific organization in the world that recommends separating MMR into three shots. … The entire basis for [Trump’s] idea comes from a study that was published over 25 years ago and then retracted, because it was scientifically invalid. That’s it.

MS NOW reports: There is not a legitimate scientific organization in the world that recommends separating MMR into three shots. … The entire basis for [Trump’s] idea comes from a study that was published over 25 years ago and then retracted, because it was scientifically invalid. That’s it.

Protect Our Care

48,932 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Our autopsy study that found 73.9% of deaths following COVID “vaccination” were caused by the shots was illegally retracted right after becoming the #1 most-read study in the WORLD. This is ACADEMIC TERRORISM. It’s time to invoke the RICO Act against the Journal Cartel.

Our autopsy study that found 73.9% of deaths following COVID “vaccination” were caused by the shots was illegally retracted right after becoming the #1 most-read study in the WORLD. This is ACADEMIC TERRORISM. It’s time to invoke the RICO Act against the Journal Cartel.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

26,756 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Yet another “Double Whammy”. A “Fraudulent” HCQ study fast tracked and promoted. An “outstanding study” suppressed for over 800 days. Dr. Sabine Hazan just testified about a “fraudulent” HCQ study which helped destroy Hydroxychloroquine. As that fraud was promoted, an “outstanding study” from Oxford was suppressed for over 800 days. sabine hazan md: “It was a fraudulent study... the media went crazy to destroy HCQ” Prof. Robert Clancy: “It took over 800 days for that study to be published.. this is criminal” Then once they destroyed natural treatments to roll out vaccines, they lumped all the vaccinated individuals into the unvaccinated group for weeks after injection, which hid safety signals and created “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” Multiple lines of statistical trickery and deceit happening on so many levels.

Yet another “Double Whammy”. A “Fraudulent” HCQ study fast tracked and promoted. An “outstanding study” suppressed for over 800 days. Dr. Sabine Hazan just testified about a “fraudulent” HCQ study which helped destroy Hydroxychloroquine. As that fraud was promoted, an “outstanding study” from Oxford was suppressed for over 800 days. sabine hazan md: “It was a fraudulent study... the media went crazy to destroy HCQ” Prof. Robert Clancy: “It took over 800 days for that study to be published.. this is criminal” Then once they destroyed natural treatments to roll out vaccines, they lumped all the vaccinated individuals into the unvaccinated group for weeks after injection, which hid safety signals and created “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” Multiple lines of statistical trickery and deceit happening on so many levels.

Humanspective

45,745 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.GSK aggressively marketed Paxil off-label for children from 1998 to 2003 until trials showed it increased risk of suicide in teens. A 2004 lawsuit revealed GSK had actively buried negative safety and efficacy data regarding children while publishing a fraudulent study (written by a ghostwriter) claiming Paxil is safe and effective for teens. This study (Study 329) was never retracted. Full interview with psychiatric RN David Wayne at 4:30pm CT

.GSK aggressively marketed Paxil off-label for children from 1998 to 2003 until trials showed it increased risk of suicide in teens. A 2004 lawsuit revealed GSK had actively buried negative safety and efficacy data regarding children while publishing a fraudulent study (written by a ghostwriter) claiming Paxil is safe and effective for teens. This study (Study 329) was never retracted. Full interview with psychiatric RN David Wayne at 4:30pm CT

Mary Talley Bowden MD

49,725 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The results of the study at the heart of our award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study” are shocking. A complaint I hear often is that the study is too small - that there aren’t enough children in the unvaccinated group. For contrast, the Hepatitis-B vaccine that we give newborns only had 147 children in it, with no control and no placebo. They were monitored for 5 days. So, a 5-day safety study with 147 children was good enough for the Hep-B approval, but a study with twenty thousand kids, two thousand of which were unvaccinated, followed for multiple years, is not? Think about that. Weston A. Price Foundation

The results of the study at the heart of our award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study” are shocking. A complaint I hear often is that the study is too small - that there aren’t enough children in the unvaccinated group. For contrast, the Hepatitis-B vaccine that we give newborns only had 147 children in it, with no control and no placebo. They were monitored for 5 days. So, a 5-day safety study with 147 children was good enough for the Hep-B approval, but a study with twenty thousand kids, two thousand of which were unvaccinated, followed for multiple years, is not? Think about that. Weston A. Price Foundation

Del Bigtree

115,850 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🔥 Attorney EXPOSES pro-vaccine hypocrisy: “They ask for evidence—yet shut down every study exposing them” Rick Jaffe: "[Paul Thomas] tried to do these vax vs. unvax studies." "10 or 11 days after he published his study, his license was emergency suspended." "I had a draft of this complaint, and we had Brian and Karl’s article in there." "Then Angela told me the study had been… withdrawn." "Withdrawn sort of [only] comes from the author." "It wasn't withdrawn by them, it was withdrawn by the scientific advisory committee." "And they didn't even check the box, they didn't tell them why." "So the irony is this is… what happens to people that publish studies [about] vax vs. unvax." "I showed these guys the most recent study to prove the point, and then their study gets retracted.” "So then they found another Preprint." "My guess is in the next month it will be withdrawn for no reason also." "This is just further evidence of these tactics." "So they switch the questions and… force the withdrawal or the retraction of all these studies." Vaccine Safety Research Foundation richard jaffe Brian Hooker, PhD

🔥 Attorney EXPOSES pro-vaccine hypocrisy: “They ask for evidence—yet shut down every study exposing them” Rick Jaffe: "[Paul Thomas] tried to do these vax vs. unvax studies." "10 or 11 days after he published his study, his license was emergency suspended." "I had a draft of this complaint, and we had Brian and Karl’s article in there." "Then Angela told me the study had been… withdrawn." "Withdrawn sort of [only] comes from the author." "It wasn't withdrawn by them, it was withdrawn by the scientific advisory committee." "And they didn't even check the box, they didn't tell them why." "So the irony is this is… what happens to people that publish studies [about] vax vs. unvax." "I showed these guys the most recent study to prove the point, and then their study gets retracted.” "So then they found another Preprint." "My guess is in the next month it will be withdrawn for no reason also." "This is just further evidence of these tactics." "So they switch the questions and… force the withdrawal or the retraction of all these studies." Vaccine Safety Research Foundation richard jaffe Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

22,675 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 WOW! Trump was right again - a major scientific journal just RETRACTED a climate change study claiming devastating impacts were coming "Nature is retracting a 2024 study predicting catastrophic economic toll of climate change." "Several banks used the report to make risk management plans." Imagine that.

🚨 WOW! Trump was right again - a major scientific journal just RETRACTED a climate change study claiming devastating impacts were coming "Nature is retracting a 2024 study predicting catastrophic economic toll of climate change." "Several banks used the report to make risk management plans." Imagine that.

Eric Daugherty

173,952 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

RFK Jr. breaks down to Bernie Sanders how vaccines are not the only thing that brought infant mortality down in the U.S. “The study you cited is a modeling study.” “CDC has actually done a real study… it says that almost none of it was attributable to vaccination.” “It was attributable to hygiene, sewer plants, better water supplies, and engineering.” “That’s not my view, that’s the CDC’s view.”

RFK Jr. breaks down to Bernie Sanders how vaccines are not the only thing that brought infant mortality down in the U.S. “The study you cited is a modeling study.” “CDC has actually done a real study… it says that almost none of it was attributable to vaccination.” “It was attributable to hygiene, sewer plants, better water supplies, and engineering.” “That’s not my view, that’s the CDC’s view.”

MAHA Action

99,729 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Trust the “Science” RFK JR - Many don’t realize, the Chickenpox Vaccine Causes shingles Epidemics “When the CDC was thinking about mandating the chickenpox vaccine for your children, they did a study. The person they hired to do that study was a scientist named Gary Goldman, who did a long-term study in California. What he found is that if you give the chickenpox vaccine, mass vaccinate, it stops chickenpox, but causes shingle epidemics later on; which is 20x deadlier. Despite those studies, we mandated for American children in this country, but in Europe they don’t. If you go to the British National Health Service website right now, you can read that it will say, “We do not recommend chickenpox vaccines because it causes shingles epidemics later on… and that’s the problem. 🔗 Yup, it’s there You can’t say this product is going to prevent this particular disease, but you have to look at the long-term implications.” Round and round the cash cow goes. They get you sick to hand you the cure, which gets you sick again. 💰 Clip Full

Trust the “Science” RFK JR - Many don’t realize, the Chickenpox Vaccine Causes shingles Epidemics “When the CDC was thinking about mandating the chickenpox vaccine for your children, they did a study. The person they hired to do that study was a scientist named Gary Goldman, who did a long-term study in California. What he found is that if you give the chickenpox vaccine, mass vaccinate, it stops chickenpox, but causes shingle epidemics later on; which is 20x deadlier. Despite those studies, we mandated for American children in this country, but in Europe they don’t. If you go to the British National Health Service website right now, you can read that it will say, “We do not recommend chickenpox vaccines because it causes shingles epidemics later on… and that’s the problem. 🔗 Yup, it’s there You can’t say this product is going to prevent this particular disease, but you have to look at the long-term implications.” Round and round the cash cow goes. They get you sick to hand you the cure, which gets you sick again. 💰 Clip Full

MJTruthUltra

835,425 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“An Inconvenient Study” asks a simple question: Are vaccinated children healthier, or less healthy? The data was clear.. higher rates of asthma, developmental delays, learning issues, and speech disorders among the vaccinated group. And yet, the study was never published. When there’s a signal this strong, you follow it. You study it. You don’t ignore it. That’s the heart of the work I do, because where there’s risk, there must be choice. Watch An Inconvenient Study free at Full interview available at Dr. Drew

“An Inconvenient Study” asks a simple question: Are vaccinated children healthier, or less healthy? The data was clear.. higher rates of asthma, developmental delays, learning issues, and speech disorders among the vaccinated group. And yet, the study was never published. When there’s a signal this strong, you follow it. You study it. You don’t ignore it. That’s the heart of the work I do, because where there’s risk, there must be choice. Watch An Inconvenient Study free at Full interview available at Dr. Drew

Del Bigtree

400,869 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

RFK Jr: “EVERYTHING is gonna change” with CDC vaccine policy 🔥 This is exactly what I voted for. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “And that one study that was done, according to the National Academy of Sciences, found that there was a link.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “We’re gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system.” “They don’t do pre-licensing safety testing for vaccine. They’re the only product that’s exempt. So what they say is, if there are injuries, we’ll capture them afterward.” “But they have a system that doesn’t capture them.” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “Why have we gone for 39 years and nobody’s fixed it?” “We’re gonna fix it.” “We’re gonna have gold standard science … we’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” Secretary Kennedy

RFK Jr: “EVERYTHING is gonna change” with CDC vaccine policy 🔥 This is exactly what I voted for. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “And that one study that was done, according to the National Academy of Sciences, found that there was a link.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “We’re gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system.” “They don’t do pre-licensing safety testing for vaccine. They’re the only product that’s exempt. So what they say is, if there are injuries, we’ll capture them afterward.” “But they have a system that doesn’t capture them.” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “Why have we gone for 39 years and nobody’s fixed it?” “We’re gonna fix it.” “We’re gonna have gold standard science … we’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” Secretary Kennedy

Holden Culotta

955,937 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: A new study that exposed a higher mortality rate in vaccinated infants than unvaccinated infants was just retracted with NO explanation. This study was groundbreaking. And it was censored less than a month after being published. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down the shocking censorship of this paper he co-wrote with Dr. Brian Hooker: “Our paper went live at the end of December, and it had an amazingly large reception with a lot of people accessing it, and it going viral on social media.” “A few days ago, we received correspondence from Preprints dot org saying that they are going to retract the paper with no explanation.” “In this paper, we demonstrate from the State of Louisiana data that children who were vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to d*e in their third month of life.” “And that was statistically significant.” “It was worse for Black children than for white children, and it was much worse for females than it was for males.”

🚨 BREAKING: A new study that exposed a higher mortality rate in vaccinated infants than unvaccinated infants was just retracted with NO explanation. This study was groundbreaking. And it was censored less than a month after being published. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down the shocking censorship of this paper he co-wrote with Dr. Brian Hooker: “Our paper went live at the end of December, and it had an amazingly large reception with a lot of people accessing it, and it going viral on social media.” “A few days ago, we received correspondence from Preprints dot org saying that they are going to retract the paper with no explanation.” “In this paper, we demonstrate from the State of Louisiana data that children who were vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to d*e in their third month of life.” “And that was statistically significant.” “It was worse for Black children than for white children, and it was much worse for females than it was for males.”

Children’s Health Defense

392,825 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten