Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is embarrassing for Amanda Rishworth. There’s no excuse for migrant tradies sitting in the same priority tier as actors, dancers, economists and animal trainers. I’ve posted the whole segment where she does her best to toe the party line – but she just keeps digging deeper. Using “expert... advice” and “professional recommendations” for the settings is a cop-out – if there’s a good reason why a chippie or sparkie should be deprioritised to the same category as an actor or dancer during a housing crisis, she should be able to explain it. Boasting about the “three times increase in the number of construction workers” is highly deceptive – the long-term average was 0.5 - 0.7% of total intake vs 0.75 - 0.85% under this government, meaning the higher number is mostly due to the higher intake and still a tiny fraction of the overall. And then she tops it off with “it hasn’t changed since the previous government” – as if the LNP is in good public standing, the ALP hasn’t been in power for over 4 years and the housing crisis hasn’t severely worsened since then. As for the question of whether trade unions are influencing our migration program? You’d have to be very naive to think they aren’t.show more

Marko Matvikov

9,548 subscribers

19,775 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

ANI

14,687 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

$The Irish government has forced young Irish people to compete with the world for property. This should not be the case during a housing crisis. Bringing in 100's of thousands of people and building a fraction of that as homes. Our government have a lot to answer for.$

The Irish government has forced young Irish people to compete with the world for property. This should not be the case during a housing crisis. Bringing in 100's of thousands of people and building a fraction of that as homes. Our government have a lot to answer for.

Michael McCarthy

64,293 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

Wildlife Notes

418,936 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

573,248 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

These gentleman have been waiting for what seems to be a long time to get gas, it’s a busy day and everyone is anxious to get their weekend started. As soon as a pump opened, this woman seemingly cuts in front of the other cars who have been patiently waiting in line and attempts to pump her gas. Not long after she does they she’s confronted by these two men who start to yell at her about cutting the line. She claims she didn’t see the line and is upset others are upset with her for it. But if this was true and she didn’t know, wouldn’t the right thing to do would be to leave the pump and get to the back of the line?

These gentleman have been waiting for what seems to be a long time to get gas, it’s a busy day and everyone is anxious to get their weekend started. As soon as a pump opened, this woman seemingly cuts in front of the other cars who have been patiently waiting in line and attempts to pump her gas. Not long after she does they she’s confronted by these two men who start to yell at her about cutting the line. She claims she didn’t see the line and is upset others are upset with her for it. But if this was true and she didn’t know, wouldn’t the right thing to do would be to leave the pump and get to the back of the line?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

75,096 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Listen to this segment of the New Statesman Podcast (Sep 26, 2025). While attempting to couch their language in such a way as to imply the right is wrong about everything, they fully admit that Liz Truss was completely snaked by the Bank of England and this raises a constitutional crisis in our country: Should it be the elected government who dictates economic policy or should it be the unelected Bank of England? This is a serious and weighty question to which there is actually an obvious answer, and they admit that the cruelty by which Truss was dealt with by the left was wholly inappropriate because Starmer's government is facing the exact same problem. It's quite a shocking listen because it reveals the sheer partisanship of the them-vs-us attitude of the liberal elites and their worship of the system as opposed to any normal Brit who actually thinks the country ought to work for the people first. If the system is not serving us then the system must change, but instead they admit the system decided it would take action against the government instead to protect itself. This is completely unacceptable, and they admit it.

Listen to this segment of the New Statesman Podcast (Sep 26, 2025). While attempting to couch their language in such a way as to imply the right is wrong about everything, they fully admit that Liz Truss was completely snaked by the Bank of England and this raises a constitutional crisis in our country: Should it be the elected government who dictates economic policy or should it be the unelected Bank of England? This is a serious and weighty question to which there is actually an obvious answer, and they admit that the cruelty by which Truss was dealt with by the left was wholly inappropriate because Starmer's government is facing the exact same problem. It's quite a shocking listen because it reveals the sheer partisanship of the them-vs-us attitude of the liberal elites and their worship of the system as opposed to any normal Brit who actually thinks the country ought to work for the people first. If the system is not serving us then the system must change, but instead they admit the system decided it would take action against the government instead to protect itself. This is completely unacceptable, and they admit it.

Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

270,194 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

12,957 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

$Amanda Galbraith on the AG report exposing the foreign student program disasters "Yeah, I think a dumpster fire is a kind way to describe what is before us here." "And respectfully, if the minister is one saying, I've only been in the job for a fraction of this audit, so don't point the finger at me, you've been part of." "There's a Liberal government that's been in place for over a decade... it is at their feet." "...And frankly, this is part of why our... consensus in this country around the benefits of immigration is eroding because we see abuse in the system and this should be taken seriously solve and good for the AG for getting to the bottom of it." Amanda Galbraith$

Amanda Galbraith on the AG report exposing the foreign student program disasters "Yeah, I think a dumpster fire is a kind way to describe what is before us here." "And respectfully, if the minister is one saying, I've only been in the job for a fraction of this audit, so don't point the finger at me, you've been part of." "There's a Liberal government that's been in place for over a decade... it is at their feet." "...And frankly, this is part of why our... consensus in this country around the benefits of immigration is eroding because we see abuse in the system and this should be taken seriously solve and good for the AG for getting to the bottom of it." Amanda Galbraith

cbcwatcher

55,227 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This server was sat a good looking couple at the sushi restaurant she serves at. She starts off with her introduction and compliments the woman for being attractive. As soon as she walks away, the woman accuses her of pandering for tips. The woman then proceeds to order a margarita with no syrup which is essentially straight tequila. The woman then proceeds to complain about how her drink tastes and leaves to use the restroom. The man who should have said something in front of his date then compliments the server and tells her how good she was and tipped her decently. One theory as far as why the woman was treated the server so poorly is that she felt threatened by how the server looked. Either way that’s no way to treat anyone, do you feel she handled this trying customer well or do you think it was a good idea to crash out in her car while driving and recording?

This server was sat a good looking couple at the sushi restaurant she serves at. She starts off with her introduction and compliments the woman for being attractive. As soon as she walks away, the woman accuses her of pandering for tips. The woman then proceeds to order a margarita with no syrup which is essentially straight tequila. The woman then proceeds to complain about how her drink tastes and leaves to use the restroom. The man who should have said something in front of his date then compliments the server and tells her how good she was and tipped her decently. One theory as far as why the woman was treated the server so poorly is that she felt threatened by how the server looked. Either way that’s no way to treat anyone, do you feel she handled this trying customer well or do you think it was a good idea to crash out in her car while driving and recording?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

147,769 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This lady sees another woman all the time with a baby stroller and a shovel. It appears she is digging up concrete and using the stroller to store and haul some of it. What could she be doing this for, or is this someone with a mental health issue? What should she do, call the authorities? I can’t think of any good reason for someone to do this.

This lady sees another woman all the time with a baby stroller and a shovel. It appears she is digging up concrete and using the stroller to store and haul some of it. What could she be doing this for, or is this someone with a mental health issue? What should she do, call the authorities? I can’t think of any good reason for someone to do this.

Suzee Q

65,407 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

#WATCH | On 'One Nation, One Election', Prashant Kishor says, "If this is done with the correct intentions and there be a transition phase of 4-5 years, then it is in the interest of the country. This was once in effect in the country for 17-18 years. Secondly, in a country as large as India, around 25% of the country votes every year. So, the people running the Govt remain busy in this circle of election. If this is limited to 1-2 times, it will be better. This will cut down expenses and people will have to take a decision only once...If you attempt an overnight transition, there will be issues. The Govt is perhaps bringing a Bill. Let it come. If the Govt has good intentions, then it should happen and it will be good for the country...But it depends on the intentions with which the Govt is bringing it..." (Video: Office of Prashant Kishor)

#WATCH | On 'One Nation, One Election', Prashant Kishor says, "If this is done with the correct intentions and there be a transition phase of 4-5 years, then it is in the interest of the country. This was once in effect in the country for 17-18 years. Secondly, in a country as large as India, around 25% of the country votes every year. So, the people running the Govt remain busy in this circle of election. If this is limited to 1-2 times, it will be better. This will cut down expenses and people will have to take a decision only once...If you attempt an overnight transition, there will be issues. The Govt is perhaps bringing a Bill. Let it come. If the Govt has good intentions, then it should happen and it will be good for the country...But it depends on the intentions with which the Govt is bringing it..." (Video: Office of Prashant Kishor)

ANI

313,435 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Another Gem of Loudmouth Supriya Shrinate in 2011 when she was Journalist Look at how, with a positive and happy face, she is reporting a price hike of ₹5 in petrol and ₹40 in LPG during UPA government. She is reporting as if the government is helpless and it is the fault of oil companies. Now answer me this, what global crisis was there in 2011? None. This hike was purely because of the incompetence of the UPA government. Now the same Supriya is attacking India when India hasn’t even hiked a single rupee even after the West Asia war.

Another Gem of Loudmouth Supriya Shrinate in 2011 when she was Journalist Look at how, with a positive and happy face, she is reporting a price hike of ₹5 in petrol and ₹40 in LPG during UPA government. She is reporting as if the government is helpless and it is the fault of oil companies. Now answer me this, what global crisis was there in 2011? None. This hike was purely because of the incompetence of the UPA government. Now the same Supriya is attacking India when India hasn’t even hiked a single rupee even after the West Asia war.

Mohit Suryavanshi

117,247 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,553 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A woman and her husband went to the store to get an Apple gift card for $100. After they got it, they had tried to use it for their iPhone. The opened the package and got the card out, the last few digits on the back of the card are missing and she couldn’t use it. She goes back to the store and speaks to customer service about a refund. Customer service claims they can’t do anything about it because there are no refunds on gift cards and they need to call the company the card is for. She then pulls a few of the same cards off of the display and opens them in front of customer service and proves to them that they all have the same issue. This does look like the card was manufactured defectively and the customer service rep acknowledged it, but why are they leaving it on the shelf for other people to buy it and be ripped off?

A woman and her husband went to the store to get an Apple gift card for $100. After they got it, they had tried to use it for their iPhone. The opened the package and got the card out, the last few digits on the back of the card are missing and she couldn’t use it. She goes back to the store and speaks to customer service about a refund. Customer service claims they can’t do anything about it because there are no refunds on gift cards and they need to call the company the card is for. She then pulls a few of the same cards off of the display and opens them in front of customer service and proves to them that they all have the same issue. This does look like the card was manufactured defectively and the customer service rep acknowledged it, but why are they leaving it on the shelf for other people to buy it and be ripped off?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

343,275 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

DISTURBING: Republicans are now openly debating whether to pardon convicted child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, and the reasoning behind it is setting off alarms. Because if the case is “closed,” as officials claim, why is a pardon even being discussed at all? New reporting shows the House Oversight Committee is split, with some pushing clemency in exchange for Maxwell’s testimony, even as the DOJ insists there’s nothing left to investigate. At the same time, her legal team is offering cooperation, claiming she can “clear names” at the highest levels. That’s where it stops making sense. If there’s no active investigation, what exactly is she cooperating with? And if there is one, why would a pardon be necessary in the first place? Instead of full transparency, we’re getting talk of deals, selective disclosures, and a convicted trafficker being positioned as the gatekeeper to the truth. So what’s really going on here, a path to justice… or an excuse to close the door for good?

DISTURBING: Republicans are now openly debating whether to pardon convicted child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, and the reasoning behind it is setting off alarms. Because if the case is “closed,” as officials claim, why is a pardon even being discussed at all? New reporting shows the House Oversight Committee is split, with some pushing clemency in exchange for Maxwell’s testimony, even as the DOJ insists there’s nothing left to investigate. At the same time, her legal team is offering cooperation, claiming she can “clear names” at the highest levels. That’s where it stops making sense. If there’s no active investigation, what exactly is she cooperating with? And if there is one, why would a pardon be necessary in the first place? Instead of full transparency, we’re getting talk of deals, selective disclosures, and a convicted trafficker being positioned as the gatekeeper to the truth. So what’s really going on here, a path to justice… or an excuse to close the door for good?

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

126,476 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Whether giraffe or an elephant, it seems the consensus is the same: the higher the leaf, the tastier it is. Kaikai has just turned one, which is still small in elephant terms – the older orphans get the best of any greens at standing height, so she has to work hard to get hers. Luckily, she has a helping hand in the form of her Keepers who will help pluck the freshest greens and fruits off the bushes for the orphans. In fact, they usually keep a stash of them in their pockets as a tasty mid-afternoon snack. Just see:

Whether giraffe or an elephant, it seems the consensus is the same: the higher the leaf, the tastier it is. Kaikai has just turned one, which is still small in elephant terms – the older orphans get the best of any greens at standing height, so she has to work hard to get hers. Luckily, she has a helping hand in the form of her Keepers who will help pluck the freshest greens and fruits off the bushes for the orphans. In fact, they usually keep a stash of them in their pockets as a tasty mid-afternoon snack. Just see:

Sheldrick Wildlife Trust

24,179 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This really is a symbol of everything wrong with modern Ireland. Demolishing a family home during a housing crisis because it violated planning laws. But the official government policy for housing asylum seekers is to bypass planning laws. In 2022 the government introduced a law allowing any number of facilities including hospitals, army barracks, shops, hotels, and even places of worship to be used for asylum seeker housing. Basically they exempted every structure in Ireland from planning laws as long as it was housing asylum seekers. That law has been extended to the end of 2028. One rule for Irish people, another when it comes to foreigners.

This really is a symbol of everything wrong with modern Ireland. Demolishing a family home during a housing crisis because it violated planning laws. But the official government policy for housing asylum seekers is to bypass planning laws. In 2022 the government introduced a law allowing any number of facilities including hospitals, army barracks, shops, hotels, and even places of worship to be used for asylum seeker housing. Basically they exempted every structure in Ireland from planning laws as long as it was housing asylum seekers. That law has been extended to the end of 2028. One rule for Irish people, another when it comes to foreigners.

MichaeloKeeffe

19,365 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Steve Kerr: “The point of where we are with the age of our best players is we can still be good, but we’re obviously not in the same class as we were 5/6 years ago. We’re not in the same class as the team we played tonight or as several other teams in the league. There’s no point in denying that. I think we have to embrace it and be realistic and give ourselves a shot.”

Steve Kerr: “The point of where we are with the age of our best players is we can still be good, but we’re obviously not in the same class as we were 5/6 years ago. We’re not in the same class as the team we played tonight or as several other teams in the league. There’s no point in denying that. I think we have to embrace it and be realistic and give ourselves a shot.”

95.7 The Game

34,121 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This woman is locked out of her home, she goes to an enclosed back door and tries to break the door to get it. Her kids aren’t home but her dog is in their whining and panicking. She goes to the garage and finds a hammer. She decides that since she lives in the middle of no where, there isn’t a locksmith that can help her now, she’s going to have to break the door. As she’s hitting the wooden door, it makes weird noises like broken glass in a box being shuffled around. She eventually breaks the door enough to get in, but this raises more questions than she can answer. Like first of all, why would the door be filled with glass and why hasn’t she noticed that before?

This woman is locked out of her home, she goes to an enclosed back door and tries to break the door to get it. Her kids aren’t home but her dog is in their whining and panicking. She goes to the garage and finds a hammer. She decides that since she lives in the middle of no where, there isn’t a locksmith that can help her now, she’s going to have to break the door. As she’s hitting the wooden door, it makes weird noises like broken glass in a box being shuffled around. She eventually breaks the door enough to get in, but this raises more questions than she can answer. Like first of all, why would the door be filled with glass and why hasn’t she noticed that before?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,480,751 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This woman lives in an HOA. The back of her yard backs up into an easement that is owned by the HOA. The trees back there are on the easement. She points out that there are fallen branches all over her neighbors yard because of the trees and there were many in her yard as well. So she and her children went and picked up all the branches and sticks in her yard and then she piled them up under the tree. She said since the tree is on the HOA easement, it’s their problem. She wants to know if she is the bad guy in all this. If it were me, I’d maintain my yard and put the branches and sticks out for the trash pickup. Do you think she is in the right and it’s the HOA’s problem? Or do you think she is wrong and is making a mountain out of a molehill and there are better hills to plant your flag on?

This woman lives in an HOA. The back of her yard backs up into an easement that is owned by the HOA. The trees back there are on the easement. She points out that there are fallen branches all over her neighbors yard because of the trees and there were many in her yard as well. So she and her children went and picked up all the branches and sticks in her yard and then she piled them up under the tree. She said since the tree is on the HOA easement, it’s their problem. She wants to know if she is the bad guy in all this. If it were me, I’d maintain my yard and put the branches and sticks out for the trash pickup. Do you think she is in the right and it’s the HOA’s problem? Or do you think she is wrong and is making a mountain out of a molehill and there are better hills to plant your flag on?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

129,717 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce