Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This is GLM-5.2 running on 3x DGX Sparks

MiaAI_lab's profile picture

Mia

10,495 subscribers

41,356 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

We did it. GLM 5.2 running on 2 DGX Sparks at 4.1 tok/sec. 704GB (FP8) down to 192GB using 2-bit expert quantization. Frontier intelligence wants to come home.
1:20

We did it. GLM 5.2 running on 2 DGX Sparks at 4.1 tok/sec. 704GB (FP8) down to 192GB using 2-bit expert quantization. Frontier intelligence wants to come home.

Joe Muller

32,953 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GLM 5.3 Flash on 2x DGX Sparks Look at the tok/s at the top :) This is prose. Releasing soon
0:23

GLM 5.3 Flash on 2x DGX Sparks Look at the tok/s at the top :) This is prose. Releasing soon

Mia

16,556 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash running on 2x DGX Sparks
0:35

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash running on 2x DGX Sparks

Mia

59,227 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

How prose looks like in Hermes agent using GLM 5.3 Flash EXL3 on 2x DGX Sparks
0:30

How prose looks like in Hermes agent using GLM 5.3 Flash EXL3 on 2x DGX Sparks

Mia

10,574 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

How DeepSeek v4.1 Flash looks on 3x DGX Sparks with 4 concurrent streams
0:50

How DeepSeek v4.1 Flash looks on 3x DGX Sparks with 4 concurrent streams

Mia

19,730 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

made this game with GLM-5.2 (claude code) running on my 32x RTX 4090s
0:20

made this game with GLM-5.2 (claude code) running on my 32x RTX 4090s

Ning

26,104 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Today, we're introducing GLM-5.2 Fast: our GLM-5.2 Model API designed for the most demanding real-time use cases. The Fast tier delivers 2-3x higher TPS than the standard GLM-5.2 MAPI.
0:32

Today, we're introducing GLM-5.2 Fast: our GLM-5.2 Model API designed for the most demanding real-time use cases. The Fast tier delivers 2-3x higher TPS than the standard GLM-5.2 MAPI.

Baseten

115,243 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Loading DeepSeek v4 Flash just reminded me how good and fast this model is and how well it runs on DGX Sparks. GLM-5.2 is really awesome, but if you want fast and concurrent inference, DS4F is still a top choice IMO. Created by DS4F in single shot The coffee guy
0:20

Loading DeepSeek v4 Flash just reminded me how good and fast this model is and how well it runs on DGX Sparks. GLM-5.2 is really awesome, but if you want fast and concurrent inference, DS4F is still a top choice IMO. Created by DS4F in single shot The coffee guy

Mia

40,794 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is up & running on 2x DGX Sparks Native vision!!! 🔥🔥
0:23

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is up & running on 2x DGX Sparks Native vision!!! 🔥🔥

Mia

29,326 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

GLM 5.2 @ 19.8 tok/sec on 2 DGX Sparks ⚡️ I switched to a dspark draft model with K=2 (model from Red Hat AI) Acceptance is ~68% because the drafter was trained with the full FP8 model... Next step is to fine tune the drafter so acceptance on this super quant goes up
0:30

GLM 5.2 @ 19.8 tok/sec on 2 DGX Sparks ⚡️ I switched to a dspark draft model with K=2 (model from Red Hat AI) Acceptance is ~68% because the drafter was trained with the full FP8 model... Next step is to fine tune the drafter so acceptance on this super quant goes up

Joe Muller

73,297 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Qwen3.8-27B is insane at browser use. Running on a DGX Spark, sped up 3x. The Qwen bros were right....!
1:13

Qwen3.8-27B is insane at browser use. Running on a DGX Spark, sped up 3x. The Qwen bros were right....!

0xSero

29,154 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Running Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (4bit quants, 177 GB) on two DGX Sparks using llama.cpp with RPC and RDMA:
0:32

Running Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (4bit quants, 177 GB) on two DGX Sparks using llama.cpp with RPC and RDMA:

Radoslav Gerganov

25,927 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

GLM 5.2, Q2_K routed experts (effectively ~2.6 bits) running with SSD streaming on an M5 Max 128GB computer.
1:31

GLM 5.2, Q2_K routed experts (effectively ~2.6 bits) running with SSD streaming on an M5 Max 128GB computer.

antirez

319,142 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GLM 5.2 runs pretty fast on Modal.
0:24

GLM 5.2 runs pretty fast on Modal.

Charles 🎉 Frye

20,342 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I ran this locally with GLM-5.3 Flash EXL3 on my DGX Sparks, and I think it beats both Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra. The crazy part: it was faster to make create this on my sparks than it was with either Fable 5.1 or Astra. Live link here:
0:25

I ran this locally with GLM-5.3 Flash EXL3 on my DGX Sparks, and I think it beats both Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra. The crazy part: it was faster to make create this on my sparks than it was with either Fable 5.1 or Astra. Live link here:

Mia

47,996 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Running a Hermes Agent with GLM 5.2 on a Computer the size of a Deck of Playing Cards 🔥🔥🔥
2:41

Running a Hermes Agent with GLM 5.2 on a Computer the size of a Deck of Playing Cards 🔥🔥🔥

Tech2Wild

19,294 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GLM-5.2 is a bigger deal than you think. > what GLM-5.2 actually scores (0:46) > "it's just a rich person's toy" (4:27) > why GLM-5.2 matters even if you never run it (7:19)
12:25

GLM-5.2 is a bigger deal than you think. > what GLM-5.2 actually scores (0:46) > "it's just a rich person's toy" (4:27) > why GLM-5.2 matters even if you never run it (7:19)

Rob Hallam

19,906 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GLM-5.2 running under my desk, modifying GGUFs to enable MTP on the Spark. What a world we live in, where you can have a megamind running off electrons going really fast.
0:27

GLM-5.2 running under my desk, modifying GGUFs to enable MTP on the Spark. What a world we live in, where you can have a megamind running off electrons going really fast.

0xSero

23,493 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)
0:23

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,695 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?
0:35

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

63,741 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten