正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Today, we're introducing GLM-5.2 Fast: our GLM-5.2 Model API designed for the most demanding real-time use cases. The Fast tier delivers 2-3x higher TPS than the standard GLM-5.2 MAPI.

Baseten

23,215 subscribers

115,626 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

25 条评论

Baseten 的头像

Baseten3 个月前

More in our blog: Try it now:

Mia 的头像

Mia3 个月前

This is insane 🔥

Jernej Strasner 的头像

Jernej Strasner3 个月前

Not as fast as @sferenceai though 🙃

JesseEvans 的头像

JesseEvans3 个月前

Is it the vision version?

Quantinine 的头像

Quantinine3 个月前

this is awesome. Will you be supporting kimi k3 release this weekend?

Baseten 的头像

Baseten3 个月前

Absolutely

Eitan Turok 的头像

Eitan Turok3 个月前

what is in/out toks/sec?

sofia 的头像

sofia3 个月前

so does "fast" mean faster tokens or faster latency

Denis Loginoff ⚡️ 的头像

Denis Loginoff ⚡️3 个月前

Does it have Zero Data Retention btw 👀

Launch Archive 的头像

Launch Archive3 个月前

GLM-5.2 Fast API offers 2-3x higher transactions per second for real-time applications, enhancing performance for users. Congrats @baseten on #1 on Launch Archive today.

Jaume Martin 的头像

Jaume Martin3 个月前

It's good, but... I hit this wall constantly... :(

KimSunIl 的头像

KimSunIl3 个月前

총 3 x DGX Spark 로 실행하는거니? glm5.2 는 어떤 모델인가요

Sebastian Buzdugan 的头像

Sebastian Buzdugan3 个月前

2-3x tps helps but p99 under bursty load decides real-time fit

Stephane 的头像

Stephane3 个月前

Nice. Can you do the same with KimiK3?

Madison Kanna 的头像

Madison Kanna3 个月前

🥳🥳🥳

vinayak 🦕 的头像

vinayak 🦕3 个月前

Need

felix 的头像

felix3 个月前

That's impressive, if it can maintain comparable performance //'GLM 5.2 Fast serves the same weights as standard GLM-5.2'

AI Mastery Guide 的头像

AI Mastery Guide3 个月前

2-3x higher TPS is a big deal for anything running in real time.

CV.YH 的头像

CV.YH3 个月前

amazing work

武止戈👽🦀相比于《1984》, 我宁可《2012》的头像

武止戈👽🦀相比于《1984》, 我宁可《2012》3 个月前

我需要“slow” api，只要不慢10倍就行，我可以用并行subagents来确保进度不被显著拖慢，只要成本能降下来就行

Jurly 的头像

Jurly3 个月前

2-3x TPS improvement is significant, what tradeoffs did you make in accuracy or context retention?

pccallout 的头像

pccallout3 个月前

Price ?

Tushar Koshti 的头像

Tushar Koshti3 个月前

#glm fast is really helpful interns of speed

lynn tam 的头像

lynn tam3 个月前

price?

x86 的头像

x863 个月前

Do that with k3 soon and you might just win

相关视频

GLM 5.2 runs pretty fast on Modal.

GLM 5.2 runs pretty fast on Modal.

Charles 🎉 Frye

20,342 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is GLM-5.2 running on 3x DGX Sparks

This is GLM-5.2 running on 3x DGX Sparks

Mia

41,809 次观看 • 3 个月前

GLM 5.2 Easy Setup with Baseten + Droid harness. 00:00 Fastest GLM 5.2 Setup Goal 00:32 Getting a Baseten API Key 01:09 Automated Droid AI Configuration 02:23 Testing the GLM 5.2 Integration 03:07 Alternative Setups and Limitations 04:14 Bonus: Setup for Other IDEs

GLM 5.2 Easy Setup with Baseten + Droid harness. 00:00 Fastest GLM 5.2 Setup Goal 00:32 Getting a Baseten API Key 01:09 Automated Droid AI Configuration 02:23 Testing the GLM 5.2 Integration 03:07 Alternative Setups and Limitations 04:14 Bonus: Setup for Other IDEs

Ray Fernando

10,580 次观看 • 4 个月前

GLM-5.2 delivers a substantial leap in app development capabilities, which also represent demanding long-horizon tasks. Results: - GLM-5.1: 21/70 - GLM-5.2: 48/70 - Claude Fable 5: 56/70 That's more than a twofold improvement from GLM-5.1 to GLM-5.2. These come from an internal benchmark of 35 challenging mobile development tasks, each run twice for a total of 70 trials. We measured task completion, defined as core features working without major issues.

GLM-5.2 delivers a substantial leap in app development capabilities, which also represent demanding long-horizon tasks. Results: - GLM-5.1: 21/70 - GLM-5.2: 48/70 - Claude Fable 5: 56/70 That's more than a twofold improvement from GLM-5.1 to GLM-5.2. These come from an internal benchmark of 35 challenging mobile development tasks, each run twice for a total of 70 trials. We measured task completion, defined as core features working without major issues.

Zixuan Li

346,910 次观看 • 4 个月前

GLM-5.2 is a bigger deal than you think. > what GLM-5.2 actually scores (0:46) > "it's just a rich person's toy" (4:27) > why GLM-5.2 matters even if you never run it (7:19)

GLM-5.2 is a bigger deal than you think. > what GLM-5.2 actually scores (0:46) > "it's just a rich person's toy" (4:27) > why GLM-5.2 matters even if you never run it (7:19)

Rob Hallam

19,906 次观看 • 4 个月前

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,766 次观看 • 4 个月前

GLM-5.2 is now available on AI/ML API! We asked it and Opus 4.8 to one-shot a playable Backrooms, same prompt. Opus got the flashlight working but you can't run and can't pause. GLM-5.2 built the full mechanics. Opus: 2:14sec & $1.94 GLM: 1:08sec & $0.37 Docs, guides & setup below:

GLM-5.2 is now available on AI/ML API! We asked it and Opus 4.8 to one-shot a playable Backrooms, same prompt. Opus got the flashlight working but you can't run and can't pause. GLM-5.2 built the full mechanics. Opus: 2:14sec & $1.94 GLM: 1:08sec & $0.37 Docs, guides & setup below:

AI/ML API

475,535 次观看 • 4 个月前

GLM-5.2确实有点东西

GLM-5.2确实有点东西

关木

58,366 次观看 • 5 个月前

I was skeptical about giving GLM-5.2 the task to build a super mario snes style game in a single HTML file so i ran the test on Opus and also on GLM-5.2 Opus didnt even try to make a game or made something but it wasn't a game GLM-5.2 one shotted a pretty functional game.. WILD

I was skeptical about giving GLM-5.2 the task to build a super mario snes style game in a single HTML file so i ran the test on Opus and also on GLM-5.2 Opus didnt even try to make a game or made something but it wasn't a game GLM-5.2 one shotted a pretty functional game.. WILD

Hermes Agent Tips

32,883 次观看 • 4 个月前

you can now get unlimited free GLM 5.2 for the first time in history 😳 this is bigger than ever. here's how to do it: 1 / cancel your existing subscriptions: cancel your Lovable, Cursor, and Claude Code subscriptions. you don't need them anymore 2 / sign up for an account on freebuff you can now use unlimited GPT 5.6 and deepseek as well. 3 / to get GLM 5.2: go to the earn tab, and complete the bounties. a bounty provides unlimited GLM 5.2 messages for an hour, each. this isn't going to last forever.

you can now get unlimited free GLM 5.2 for the first time in history 😳 this is bigger than ever. here's how to do it: 1 / cancel your existing subscriptions: cancel your Lovable, Cursor, and Claude Code subscriptions. you don't need them anymore 2 / sign up for an account on freebuff you can now use unlimited GPT 5.6 and deepseek as well. 3 / to get GLM 5.2: go to the earn tab, and complete the bounties. a bounty provides unlimited GLM 5.2 messages for an hour, each. this isn't going to last forever.

Victor Cheng

55,221 次观看 • 3 个月前

Looking like we'll 4x revenue in the next 90 days, thnx GLM 5.2

Looking like we'll 4x revenue in the next 90 days, thnx GLM 5.2

Sam Hogan 🇺🇸

26,460 次观看 • 4 个月前

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

151,027 次观看 • 4 个月前

I just tested GLM 5.2, Claude opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 to see which one could rebuild my personal site in that whimsical ascii style GLM 5.2 held its own and went toe to toe with the other 2 top tier models lowkey impressed, look at the hero section it built here

I just tested GLM 5.2, Claude opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 to see which one could rebuild my personal site in that whimsical ascii style GLM 5.2 held its own and went toe to toe with the other 2 top tier models lowkey impressed, look at the hero section it built here

Ann Nguyen

33,873 次观看 • 4 个月前

Nvidia could release a GLM 5.2 or better equivalent model any time it wants, and nuke OpenAI's margins 🤯

Nvidia could release a GLM 5.2 or better equivalent model any time it wants, and nuke OpenAI's margins 🤯

Marcelo P. Lima

102,723 次观看 • 4 个月前

Coding Benchmark: Cursor Composer 2.5 vs Z.ai GLM 5.2 Task: DLA (Diffusion-Limited Aggregation) Judge: GPT 5.5 Pro 🎉Winner: Composer 2.5🎉 Sebep: Prompt’un “crux” dediği nokta performanstı: en az ~50.000 particle’da responsive kalma, optimize algoritma, live stats ve performans barı. Composer çözümü bu gereksinime daha doğrudan oynuyor: sabit 720x720 lattice grid, Int32Array, Int16Array, offscreen ImageData, MAX_WALKERS = 192, adaptive performance loop ve gerçek bir performance bar var. Prompt açıkça 50k real-time performansı ve box-counting doğrulamasını kritik görüyor. Final Puantaj ve Özet: - Cursor Composer 2.5 - 83/100 - GLM 5.2 - 80/100 GLM 5.2 zayıflıkları - Performance bar yok. Prompt bunu açıkça istiyordu. - Seeded determinism yok. Math.random() doğrudan kullanılıyor. - boundingR güncellemesi gecikmeli. Spawn bölgesi hızlı büyümede stale kalabilir. - Map tabanlı grid 50k+ için typed-array grid kadar stabil değil. - Start/Pause tek toggle. Kullanılır ama Composer kadar net değil. Cursor Composer 2.5 zayıflıkları - Sabit 720×720 dünya. Büyük aggregate ve uzun koşularda sınır etkisi üretir. - 4-neighbor lattice artifact riski. Daha kare/piksel tabanlı görünür. - Glow çok temel. Gerçek bloom değil, shadowBlur benzeri. - Seeded determinism yok. O da Math.random() kullanıyor. - Fraktal estetiği GLM kadar organik olmayabilir. 1)Prompt uyumu - Composer 2.5 : 8.6/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.1/10 2)DLA algoritma doğruluğu - Composer 2.5 : 8.2 / 10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.0 / 10 3) Performans mimarisi - Composer 2.5 : 9.0/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.0/10 Görsel kalite / seyir zevki - Composer 2.5 : 7.3/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.4/10 UI / kontrol paneli - Composer 2.5 : 8.7/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.2/10 Live stats / correctness check - Composer 2.5 : 8.8/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.4/10 Ölçeklenebilirlik - Composer 2.5 : 7.5/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.3/10 Kod mimarisi / okunabilirlik - Composer 2.5 : 8.4 / 10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.0/10 Risk / bug potansiyeli - Composer 2.5 : 7.8/10 - GLM 5.2 : 7.2/10

Coding Benchmark: Cursor Composer 2.5 vs Z.ai GLM 5.2 Task: DLA (Diffusion-Limited Aggregation) Judge: GPT 5.5 Pro 🎉Winner: Composer 2.5🎉 Sebep: Prompt’un “crux” dediği nokta performanstı: en az ~50.000 particle’da responsive kalma, optimize algoritma, live stats ve performans barı. Composer çözümü bu gereksinime daha doğrudan oynuyor: sabit 720x720 lattice grid, Int32Array, Int16Array, offscreen ImageData, MAX_WALKERS = 192, adaptive performance loop ve gerçek bir performance bar var. Prompt açıkça 50k real-time performansı ve box-counting doğrulamasını kritik görüyor. Final Puantaj ve Özet: - Cursor Composer 2.5 - 83/100 - GLM 5.2 - 80/100 GLM 5.2 zayıflıkları - Performance bar yok. Prompt bunu açıkça istiyordu. - Seeded determinism yok. Math.random() doğrudan kullanılıyor. - boundingR güncellemesi gecikmeli. Spawn bölgesi hızlı büyümede stale kalabilir. - Map tabanlı grid 50k+ için typed-array grid kadar stabil değil. - Start/Pause tek toggle. Kullanılır ama Composer kadar net değil. Cursor Composer 2.5 zayıflıkları - Sabit 720×720 dünya. Büyük aggregate ve uzun koşularda sınır etkisi üretir. - 4-neighbor lattice artifact riski. Daha kare/piksel tabanlı görünür. - Glow çok temel. Gerçek bloom değil, shadowBlur benzeri. - Seeded determinism yok. O da Math.random() kullanıyor. - Fraktal estetiği GLM kadar organik olmayabilir. 1)Prompt uyumu - Composer 2.5 : 8.6/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.1/10 2)DLA algoritma doğruluğu - Composer 2.5 : 8.2 / 10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.0 / 10 3) Performans mimarisi - Composer 2.5 : 9.0/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.0/10 Görsel kalite / seyir zevki - Composer 2.5 : 7.3/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.4/10 UI / kontrol paneli - Composer 2.5 : 8.7/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.2/10 Live stats / correctness check - Composer 2.5 : 8.8/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.4/10 Ölçeklenebilirlik - Composer 2.5 : 7.5/10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.3/10 Kod mimarisi / okunabilirlik - Composer 2.5 : 8.4 / 10 - GLM 5.2 : 8.0/10 Risk / bug potansiyeli - Composer 2.5 : 7.8/10 - GLM 5.2 : 7.2/10

Alican Kiraz

17,416 次观看 • 4 个月前

We ran GLM 5.2 and Kimi K3 on 100 deep research tasks (DRACO by perplexity) and asked Fable to be the judge Kimi K3: 71.6 mean score, 77% pass rate GLM 5.2: 41.5 mean score, 22% pass rate K3 took 3h 38m and $60. GLM finished in 1h 45m for $12.50. Deep Dive in 🧵

We ran GLM 5.2 and Kimi K3 on 100 deep research tasks (DRACO by perplexity) and asked Fable to be the judge Kimi K3: 71.6 mean score, 77% pass rate GLM 5.2: 41.5 mean score, 22% pass rate K3 took 3h 38m and $60. GLM finished in 1h 45m for $12.50. Deep Dive in 🧵

GMI Cloud

111,643 次观看 • 3 个月前

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

Hassan

20,164 次观看 • 4 个月前

Запуск ИИ на 744 МЛРД параметров БЕЗ видеокарты! Обзор GLM-5.2 локально

Запуск ИИ на 744 МЛРД параметров БЕЗ видеокарты! Обзор GLM-5.2 локально

Взаимная подписка с адекватными

11,172 次观看 • 2 个月前

We're proud to be the fastest inference provider on Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face for GLM-5.3-Flash, at 122+ TPS. All served from the US only, starting on day 0, with ZDR by default. Stay tuned for updates as our engineers continue to optimize GLM-5.3-Flash for even higher throughput and lower latency.

We're proud to be the fastest inference provider on Artificial Analysis, OpenRouter, and Hugging Face for GLM-5.3-Flash, at 122+ TPS. All served from the US only, starting on day 0, with ZDR by default. Stay tuned for updates as our engineers continue to optimize GLM-5.3-Flash for even higher throughput and lower latency.

Baseten

23,114 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 GLM 5.3 just dropped, and here’s how to access the GLM family completely FREE. no subscription. no API credit cost & no rate limit. step 1️⃣: download the OpenCode app on your PC. it’s available on both Mac and Windows. 🔗: step 2️⃣: go to NVIDIA’s website, sign up with your email, verify your account, and generate a unified API key for free. NVIDIA offers free model endpoints for developers, and GLM 5.2 is one of the top models currently available there. 🔗: step 3️⃣: launch OpenCode, open the model selection menu, search for NVIDIA, and paste the API key you generated. also, there’s no rate limit, but traffic to the model through NVIDIA can get busy at times, so responses may occasionally be slower or temporarily unavailable. the only catch: NVIDIA hasn’t listed GLM 5.3 yet, so for now you’ll be using GLM 5.2. once GLM 5.3 gets added to NVIDIA’s model catalog, you should be able to switch to it the same way.

🚨 GLM 5.3 just dropped, and here’s how to access the GLM family completely FREE. no subscription. no API credit cost & no rate limit. step 1️⃣: download the OpenCode app on your PC. it’s available on both Mac and Windows. 🔗: step 2️⃣: go to NVIDIA’s website, sign up with your email, verify your account, and generate a unified API key for free. NVIDIA offers free model endpoints for developers, and GLM 5.2 is one of the top models currently available there. 🔗: step 3️⃣: launch OpenCode, open the model selection menu, search for NVIDIA, and paste the API key you generated. also, there’s no rate limit, but traffic to the model through NVIDIA can get busy at times, so responses may occasionally be slower or temporarily unavailable. the only catch: NVIDIA hasn’t listed GLM 5.3 yet, so for now you’ll be using GLM 5.2. once GLM 5.3 gets added to NVIDIA’s model catalog, you should be able to switch to it the same way.

m0h

101,243 次观看 • 2 个月前