Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This is India in 2026! A baba with ZERO children. ZERO wife. ZERO accountability. Is telling YOUR family to produce 4 kids, and hand one over to RSS. Not to ISRO. Not to the Army. Not to a school. To a private organisation with ZERO constitutional status. Facts they...

TheSincereDude's profile picture

Sincere Dibya

13,974 subscribers

32,569 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🇲🇽 Elon Musk CAN'T HAVE MEXICO'S LITHIUM so he is angry at Sheinbaum for eliminating the biggest cartel head in the planet. 13 days ago, President Sheinbaum said this: "Remember that in the Constitution, one of the modifications to the constitutional 28 is that only the State can exploit lithium; it was not only in the Mining Law, but also in the Constitution. So, in this case, no private company, no private miner, could exploit lithium."
0:24

🚨🇲🇽 Elon Musk CAN'T HAVE MEXICO'S LITHIUM so he is angry at Sheinbaum for eliminating the biggest cartel head in the planet. 13 days ago, President Sheinbaum said this: "Remember that in the Constitution, one of the modifications to the constitutional 28 is that only the State can exploit lithium; it was not only in the Mining Law, but also in the Constitution. So, in this case, no private company, no private miner, could exploit lithium."

Samuel 🇲🇽

163,183 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This is not a university in some Islamic country. This prayer was held at UCLA in California. Perhaps some think this is a harmless prayer, something that we can understand as freedom of religion. And just that is a mistake that could destroy the West. This is not a private matter, this shows how hard they could weigh on political decisions. This religious display of power has no place in a university. Praying with such a large group is a manifestation of power which falls under the political piece of Islam. Islam is gaining ground thanks to its presence in everyday life. It’s not just confined to the private sphere as it is with other religions. The words "Allahu akbar" recur every time in a prayer to remind people that "Allah is the greatest" of all gods. In Arabic, "kabir" means "great", "akbar" means "GREATEST". With such manifestations, they want to show their power. And they want to show that they will dominate. This is far from innocent, time to wake up.
0:45

This is not a university in some Islamic country. This prayer was held at UCLA in California. Perhaps some think this is a harmless prayer, something that we can understand as freedom of religion. And just that is a mistake that could destroy the West. This is not a private matter, this shows how hard they could weigh on political decisions. This religious display of power has no place in a university. Praying with such a large group is a manifestation of power which falls under the political piece of Islam. Islam is gaining ground thanks to its presence in everyday life. It’s not just confined to the private sphere as it is with other religions. The words "Allahu akbar" recur every time in a prayer to remind people that "Allah is the greatest" of all gods. In Arabic, "kabir" means "great", "akbar" means "GREATEST". With such manifestations, they want to show their power. And they want to show that they will dominate. This is far from innocent, time to wake up.

Darya Safai MP

465,978 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Cincinnati 6’11 Forward Baba Miller is one of the most underrated prospects in the 2026 NBA Draft. Baba has had a strong season where he’s averaging 14/10/3 along with 1.4 blocks a game and 1 steal a game. He’s also shooting 55% from the field. Baba has the frame, tools, and athleticism to be an elite defender in the NBA, with his 7’2 wingspan at 6’11. Baba has been one of the best and most versatile defenders in the country this season with his ability to switch and defend multiple positions, along with having great instincts on the defensive end. On the offensive end Baba is one of the best off ball forwards who uses his athleticism to set himself up for a layup or lob after a PNR or cut. Baba can also create in the HC with his handle or push it in transition with efficiency. Baba is also one of the best big passers in the class, with his court vision. Baba is also one of 2 players in college basketball this season to have an AST% of 20 and a BLK% of 5.
4:14

Cincinnati 6’11 Forward Baba Miller is one of the most underrated prospects in the 2026 NBA Draft. Baba has had a strong season where he’s averaging 14/10/3 along with 1.4 blocks a game and 1 steal a game. He’s also shooting 55% from the field. Baba has the frame, tools, and athleticism to be an elite defender in the NBA, with his 7’2 wingspan at 6’11. Baba has been one of the best and most versatile defenders in the country this season with his ability to switch and defend multiple positions, along with having great instincts on the defensive end. On the offensive end Baba is one of the best off ball forwards who uses his athleticism to set himself up for a layup or lob after a PNR or cut. Baba can also create in the HC with his handle or push it in transition with efficiency. Baba is also one of the best big passers in the class, with his court vision. Baba is also one of 2 players in college basketball this season to have an AST% of 20 and a BLK% of 5.

KJ

146,113 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking at the release ceremony of the book 'RSS@100: A Century of Service, Unity & Sacrifice' at Uprashtrapati Bhavan, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says, "Every 'Sarsanghchalak' of the Sangh to date has opposed discrimination and untouchability in society... The Sangh has always operated with the spirit of 'Nation First, Always First,' and the result is that the RSS has become the world's largest and financially self-reliant voluntary organisation. Yet, recently, a senior Congress leader asked why the RSS is not registered. Such questions do not merit a response, as the Constitution grants every individual the right to form an organisation... I would like to add that a mother's love requires no license. The values ​​instilled by a 'Guru' do not depend on a government seal. Maa Ganga needs no license to flow. The sun requires no registration to radiate light. Similarly, the RSS is a civilizational force that needs no certification or validation..." He adds, "There is perhaps no other organisation in the world that has operated continuously on such a massive scale and for such a long period without ever splitting... This is a result of both its leadership quality and the core ethos embodied in the sentiment:... 'Everything belongs to the nation; nothing is mine'... You would never see the Sangh boasting about its own work. A fundamental tenet of the Sangh is indifference to fame... When the time came to celebrate its centenary, the RSS maintained that it was an occasion for introspection and self-reflection rather than mere celebration... The Sangh marked this milestone by taking five pledges ('Panch Pran'). The objective of these pledges is to build a society that is grounded in values ​​('sanskar'), capable, self-reliant, environmentally conscious, and mindful of its duties. I believe these five pledges constitute the five pillars of a developed India."
5:27

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking at the release ceremony of the book 'RSS@100: A Century of Service, Unity & Sacrifice' at Uprashtrapati Bhavan, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says, "Every 'Sarsanghchalak' of the Sangh to date has opposed discrimination and untouchability in society... The Sangh has always operated with the spirit of 'Nation First, Always First,' and the result is that the RSS has become the world's largest and financially self-reliant voluntary organisation. Yet, recently, a senior Congress leader asked why the RSS is not registered. Such questions do not merit a response, as the Constitution grants every individual the right to form an organisation... I would like to add that a mother's love requires no license. The values ​​instilled by a 'Guru' do not depend on a government seal. Maa Ganga needs no license to flow. The sun requires no registration to radiate light. Similarly, the RSS is a civilizational force that needs no certification or validation..." He adds, "There is perhaps no other organisation in the world that has operated continuously on such a massive scale and for such a long period without ever splitting... This is a result of both its leadership quality and the core ethos embodied in the sentiment:... 'Everything belongs to the nation; nothing is mine'... You would never see the Sangh boasting about its own work. A fundamental tenet of the Sangh is indifference to fame... When the time came to celebrate its centenary, the RSS maintained that it was an occasion for introspection and self-reflection rather than mere celebration... The Sangh marked this milestone by taking five pledges ('Panch Pran'). The objective of these pledges is to build a society that is grounded in values ​​('sanskar'), capable, self-reliant, environmentally conscious, and mindful of its duties. I believe these five pledges constitute the five pillars of a developed India."

ANI

19,393 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

USCIRF’s latest recommendations : Asking the US govt to sanction the RSS and even India’s intelligence agency RAW, while pushing to designate India as a “Country of Particular Concern.” Not surprising though. This is the same USCIRF that has long been accused of bias, with even calls in the US itself to dissolve the body for issuing politically motivated reports that deepen mistrust with strategic partners like India. In 2024, India’s MEA has already called it what it is, a biased organisation with a political agenda that publishes propaganda on India year after year. Now my question to USCIRF , more than 10 Hindus have been killed in Bangladesh for their religion, have you ever recommended anything about that ?
0:50

USCIRF’s latest recommendations : Asking the US govt to sanction the RSS and even India’s intelligence agency RAW, while pushing to designate India as a “Country of Particular Concern.” Not surprising though. This is the same USCIRF that has long been accused of bias, with even calls in the US itself to dissolve the body for issuing politically motivated reports that deepen mistrust with strategic partners like India. In 2024, India’s MEA has already called it what it is, a biased organisation with a political agenda that publishes propaganda on India year after year. Now my question to USCIRF , more than 10 Hindus have been killed in Bangladesh for their religion, have you ever recommended anything about that ?

Mr Sinha

104,081 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I note Prime Minister Andrew Holness’s remarks in a TV interview this morning. Neither he nor his Party has made those proposals as part of the process of constitutional reform. His proposals are therefore not in the report of the Constitutional Reform Committee, and will not be in the new Constitution coming out of that process. Furthermore, Mr. Holness’s proposals are not in the existing Constitution, and would violate the existing Constitution. This is in keeping with his and his Government’s unfortunate history of past violations of the Constitution of Jamaica. It seems that the Prime Minister wants to make up a rule which is not part of the Constitution or laws of Jamaica, to suit his Party’s political fortune at a time when it is waning. He has no power and no authority to do that. He needs to tell the country why his statutory declarations to the Integrity Commission cannot be certified. I am compliant with the Constitution and laws of Jamaica, and I undertake to the People of Jamaica that I will continue to be so.
1:26

I note Prime Minister Andrew Holness’s remarks in a TV interview this morning. Neither he nor his Party has made those proposals as part of the process of constitutional reform. His proposals are therefore not in the report of the Constitutional Reform Committee, and will not be in the new Constitution coming out of that process. Furthermore, Mr. Holness’s proposals are not in the existing Constitution, and would violate the existing Constitution. This is in keeping with his and his Government’s unfortunate history of past violations of the Constitution of Jamaica. It seems that the Prime Minister wants to make up a rule which is not part of the Constitution or laws of Jamaica, to suit his Party’s political fortune at a time when it is waning. He has no power and no authority to do that. He needs to tell the country why his statutory declarations to the Integrity Commission cannot be certified. I am compliant with the Constitution and laws of Jamaica, and I undertake to the People of Jamaica that I will continue to be so.

Mark J. Golding

32,129 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee
1:14

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee

Patrick McGreal

12,063 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

This is one of the most astonishing interviews I've ever seen in my life. A mother/daughter duo at a South Carolina "No Kings" protest could not explain AT ALL to a reporter why either of them were protesting. Zero clue. Not a single coherent sentence, unbelievable to watch...
1:21

This is one of the most astonishing interviews I've ever seen in my life. A mother/daughter duo at a South Carolina "No Kings" protest could not explain AT ALL to a reporter why either of them were protesting. Zero clue. Not a single coherent sentence, unbelievable to watch...

Matt Van Swol

455,454 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: On One Nation One Election Bill, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh says, "The Congress party firmly, totally, comprehensively reject the one nation, one election bill. We will oppose the introduction. We will demand its reference to a Joint Parliamentary Committee. We believe it's unconstitutional. We believe it goes against the basic structure and it is meant to throttle democracy and accountability in this country. Mallikarjun Kharge had written to former President Ramnath Kovind on 17 January on why the Congress party is objecting to the very idea of one nation, one election. The one nation, one election bill is only the first milestone, the real objective is to bring a new constitution. Amending the Constitution is one thing but bringing a Constitution which is the real objective of the RSS and PM Modi...We know what the RSS thinks about this Constitution. They rejected this Constitution on 30th November 1949 saying that it doesn't derive inspiration from the values of Manusmriti and so on. One nation, one election, is only a first step, the real step is to completely change this Constitution, replace this constitution with a new constitution. That's what we are opposing..."
3:21

#WATCH | Delhi: On One Nation One Election Bill, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh says, "The Congress party firmly, totally, comprehensively reject the one nation, one election bill. We will oppose the introduction. We will demand its reference to a Joint Parliamentary Committee. We believe it's unconstitutional. We believe it goes against the basic structure and it is meant to throttle democracy and accountability in this country. Mallikarjun Kharge had written to former President Ramnath Kovind on 17 January on why the Congress party is objecting to the very idea of one nation, one election. The one nation, one election bill is only the first milestone, the real objective is to bring a new constitution. Amending the Constitution is one thing but bringing a Constitution which is the real objective of the RSS and PM Modi...We know what the RSS thinks about this Constitution. They rejected this Constitution on 30th November 1949 saying that it doesn't derive inspiration from the values of Manusmriti and so on. One nation, one election, is only a first step, the real step is to completely change this Constitution, replace this constitution with a new constitution. That's what we are opposing..."

ANI

17,418 просмотров • 1 год назад

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Iran: India🇮🇳 can be a PEACEMAKER, BRICS & India can stop the US’🇺🇸 DELUSIONS ‘India definitely has the stature, the power, the dignity, the precision to say no to American delusions. India is four times the United States in population. It is ten times, and longer actually, in its civilisational history. It can say to the United States, stop misbehaving. But I am suggesting that India do this together, not by itself, but together with Russia and with China, with Brazil, with the other BRICS countries. I’m saying that for a couple of reasons. First, institutionally, India is the President of the BRICS this year. I regard the BRICS as tremendously important, as consequential and as beneficial for the world, as a stabiliser for the world. Half the world’s population, half the world’s GDP, major countries. And to be able to say we’re not in a US-run world, we’re not in a world where the US can declare it’s going to put another country into the Stone Ages, we’re in a civilised world based on international law, on the UN Charter. So the BRICS presidency is a particular reason. Second, it isn’t pleasant dealing with Mr. Trump, I have no doubt about it. So it’s better to do it together with partners. I like to think of India and China and Russia as partners, not only as fellow members of the BRICS, but as partners in saying we want a multipolar world, not a world of blocs and not a world in which the United States continues its 30-plus-year delusion of hegemony. So to my mind, safety in numbers, good company, BRICS presidency. This is all a case for India’s leadership. I also happen to believe in India, that it can be a peacemaker, that it can really contribute consequentially. India’s relations with Persia also go back a very long way. And so India’s relations with Iran are deep and go back a long way.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
2:44

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Iran: India🇮🇳 can be a PEACEMAKER, BRICS & India can stop the US’🇺🇸 DELUSIONS ‘India definitely has the stature, the power, the dignity, the precision to say no to American delusions. India is four times the United States in population. It is ten times, and longer actually, in its civilisational history. It can say to the United States, stop misbehaving. But I am suggesting that India do this together, not by itself, but together with Russia and with China, with Brazil, with the other BRICS countries. I’m saying that for a couple of reasons. First, institutionally, India is the President of the BRICS this year. I regard the BRICS as tremendously important, as consequential and as beneficial for the world, as a stabiliser for the world. Half the world’s population, half the world’s GDP, major countries. And to be able to say we’re not in a US-run world, we’re not in a world where the US can declare it’s going to put another country into the Stone Ages, we’re in a civilised world based on international law, on the UN Charter. So the BRICS presidency is a particular reason. Second, it isn’t pleasant dealing with Mr. Trump, I have no doubt about it. So it’s better to do it together with partners. I like to think of India and China and Russia as partners, not only as fellow members of the BRICS, but as partners in saying we want a multipolar world, not a world of blocs and not a world in which the United States continues its 30-plus-year delusion of hegemony. So to my mind, safety in numbers, good company, BRICS presidency. This is all a case for India’s leadership. I also happen to believe in India, that it can be a peacemaker, that it can really contribute consequentially. India’s relations with Persia also go back a very long way. And so India’s relations with Iran are deep and go back a long way.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

60,059 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Neha Bora, National President of AISA (CPI-ML Liberation), says a "Second War of Independence" is needed to eradicate BJP and RSS from the soil of India. This is coming from a leader whose organisation has almost zero electoral presence, no state government, and negligible strength in Parliament. A fringe leftist talking about wiping out democratic organisations that have the support of crores of Indians is not activism. It is a dangerous call for political elimination and anarchy.
0:56

Neha Bora, National President of AISA (CPI-ML Liberation), says a "Second War of Independence" is needed to eradicate BJP and RSS from the soil of India. This is coming from a leader whose organisation has almost zero electoral presence, no state government, and negligible strength in Parliament. A fringe leftist talking about wiping out democratic organisations that have the support of crores of Indians is not activism. It is a dangerous call for political elimination and anarchy.

BALA

495,703 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

One should have no hesitation in admitting that the RSS No 2, Dattatreya Hosabale, has taken a position that is fundamentally #AntiIndia. At a time when the Government of India has rightly asserted that TERROR and TALKS cannot go hand in hand, it is shocking that an individual at the helm of affairs within the ideological root organisation of the ruling party appears willing to advocate for trade talks and visa relaxations with those who continue to enable hostility against India. This position is indefensible, deeply insensitive and profoundly disrespectful to the sacrifices made for this country.
1:07

One should have no hesitation in admitting that the RSS No 2, Dattatreya Hosabale, has taken a position that is fundamentally #AntiIndia. At a time when the Government of India has rightly asserted that TERROR and TALKS cannot go hand in hand, it is shocking that an individual at the helm of affairs within the ideological root organisation of the ruling party appears willing to advocate for trade talks and visa relaxations with those who continue to enable hostility against India. This position is indefensible, deeply insensitive and profoundly disrespectful to the sacrifices made for this country.

Adit

14,803 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: A masked ICE agent was caught on a surveillance camera trespassing through private backyards, with his taser drawn, in Pompano Beach, Florida. In the video, the masked agent can be seen walking through private backyards, searching each property’s patio, with his taser drawn… before walking away. And we need to stop normalizing this. The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires the government to have a warrant, consent, or a recognized exception before entering private property to conduct a search. Your backyard is still your private property. Your constitutional rights don’t disappear because the person walking onto your property is wearing a badge. And somehow, we’re being conditioned to see this as normal. IT IS NOT NORMAL. It should not be normal. Because if the government can just walk onto your private property, with weapons drawn, and expect you to accept it… we’re not talking about immigration enforcement anymore. We’re talking about a government that is no longer respecting the constitutional rights of the people it’s supposed to be protecting.
0:28

🚨BREAKING: A masked ICE agent was caught on a surveillance camera trespassing through private backyards, with his taser drawn, in Pompano Beach, Florida. In the video, the masked agent can be seen walking through private backyards, searching each property’s patio, with his taser drawn… before walking away. And we need to stop normalizing this. The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires the government to have a warrant, consent, or a recognized exception before entering private property to conduct a search. Your backyard is still your private property. Your constitutional rights don’t disappear because the person walking onto your property is wearing a badge. And somehow, we’re being conditioned to see this as normal. IT IS NOT NORMAL. It should not be normal. Because if the government can just walk onto your private property, with weapons drawn, and expect you to accept it… we’re not talking about immigration enforcement anymore. We’re talking about a government that is no longer respecting the constitutional rights of the people it’s supposed to be protecting.

Jesus Freakin Congress

98,431 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The objection by the representative of India to Pakistan's mention of Jammu and Kashmir in the Arria Formula meeting was not surprising to us. India, as a party to the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, has actually refused to implement the Security Council resolutions on this dispute, and has even refused to cooperate with the United Nations, including the good offices of the Secretary-General, and with all those mechanisms that form part of Chapter VI. As I stated in my statement, Kashmir is an international dispute. It is on the agenda of the Security Council. It was never a part of India, and it is not, and cannot be, part of India — because this was the core question at the heart of these Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir. The purpose was to determine the status of this territory: whether it wishes to be part of India or Pakistan. That status has not yet been determined, because the resolutions have not been implemented. To assert that Kashmir is a part of India is, in fact, itself a violation of the relevant Security Council resolutions. Please watch my response below to the misleading remarks of the Indian representative
2:14

The objection by the representative of India to Pakistan's mention of Jammu and Kashmir in the Arria Formula meeting was not surprising to us. India, as a party to the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, has actually refused to implement the Security Council resolutions on this dispute, and has even refused to cooperate with the United Nations, including the good offices of the Secretary-General, and with all those mechanisms that form part of Chapter VI. As I stated in my statement, Kashmir is an international dispute. It is on the agenda of the Security Council. It was never a part of India, and it is not, and cannot be, part of India — because this was the core question at the heart of these Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir. The purpose was to determine the status of this territory: whether it wishes to be part of India or Pakistan. That status has not yet been determined, because the resolutions have not been implemented. To assert that Kashmir is a part of India is, in fact, itself a violation of the relevant Security Council resolutions. Please watch my response below to the misleading remarks of the Indian representative

Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, PR of Pakistan to the UN

62,808 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Denied entry into a public court for hours. Let that sink in. Locked out of justice like it is a private club, not a constitutional right. And when we finally got in, the same system had the audacity to hide behind a broken Zoom connection, refusing to even produce people physically. A whole court reduced to buffering screens and excuses. This is not justice. This is a disgrace. A weak, failing system exposing itself in broad daylight. Ugandans are not fools, and we will not be silent in the face of this shame.
0:33

Denied entry into a public court for hours. Let that sink in. Locked out of justice like it is a private club, not a constitutional right. And when we finally got in, the same system had the audacity to hide behind a broken Zoom connection, refusing to even produce people physically. A whole court reduced to buffering screens and excuses. This is not justice. This is a disgrace. A weak, failing system exposing itself in broad daylight. Ugandans are not fools, and we will not be silent in the face of this shame.

Nina Roz Kankunda

19,008 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The hate speeches from DMK’s stable continue unabated. After Udhayanidhi Stalin’s call to annihilate Sanatan Dharma, it is now A Raja who calls for balkanisation of India, derides Bhagwan Ram, makes disparaging comments on Manipuris and questions the idea of India, as a nation. Congress and other I.N.D.I Alliance partners are quiet. Rahul Gandhi, their putative Prime Ministerial candidate’s silence is eloquent. Listen in. ———- India is not a nation. Understand this well. India is never a nation. One nation means one language, one tradition and one culture. Then only it is one nation. India is not a nation but a subcontinent. What’s the reason? Here, Tamil is one nation and one country. Malayalam is one language, one nation and one country. Oriya is a nation, a language and a country. All these nations make up India. So, India is not country it is a subcontinent. There are so many traditions and cultures. If you come to Tamil Nadu, there’s a culture. In Kerala, there’s another culture. In Delhi, there’s another culture. In Oriya, there’s another culture. Why in Manipur, as RS Bharathi said, they eat dog meat. Yes, it is true, they eat. That’s a culture. There’s nothing wrong. It’s all in our mind.” “From the water tank, water comes to the kitchen. We will use the water in the kitchen. Same water from the water tank comes in toilet but we won’t use it from there. What’s the reason? We’re having a problem psychologically. Water is the same but there’s a difference from where it comes. We acknowledge both. That’s toilet and this is kitchen. Similarly, in Kashmir there’s a culture. Acknowledge it. In Manipur, people eat dog meat, acknowledge it. If a community eats beef, what is your problem? Did they ask you to eat? So, unity in diversity. We’ve differences. Acknowledge it. Link:
1:21

The hate speeches from DMK’s stable continue unabated. After Udhayanidhi Stalin’s call to annihilate Sanatan Dharma, it is now A Raja who calls for balkanisation of India, derides Bhagwan Ram, makes disparaging comments on Manipuris and questions the idea of India, as a nation. Congress and other I.N.D.I Alliance partners are quiet. Rahul Gandhi, their putative Prime Ministerial candidate’s silence is eloquent. Listen in. ———- India is not a nation. Understand this well. India is never a nation. One nation means one language, one tradition and one culture. Then only it is one nation. India is not a nation but a subcontinent. What’s the reason? Here, Tamil is one nation and one country. Malayalam is one language, one nation and one country. Oriya is a nation, a language and a country. All these nations make up India. So, India is not country it is a subcontinent. There are so many traditions and cultures. If you come to Tamil Nadu, there’s a culture. In Kerala, there’s another culture. In Delhi, there’s another culture. In Oriya, there’s another culture. Why in Manipur, as RS Bharathi said, they eat dog meat. Yes, it is true, they eat. That’s a culture. There’s nothing wrong. It’s all in our mind.” “From the water tank, water comes to the kitchen. We will use the water in the kitchen. Same water from the water tank comes in toilet but we won’t use it from there. What’s the reason? We’re having a problem psychologically. Water is the same but there’s a difference from where it comes. We acknowledge both. That’s toilet and this is kitchen. Similarly, in Kashmir there’s a culture. Acknowledge it. In Manipur, people eat dog meat, acknowledge it. If a community eats beef, what is your problem? Did they ask you to eat? So, unity in diversity. We’ve differences. Acknowledge it. Link:

Amit Malviya

165,276 просмотров • 2 лет назад