正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 THIS IS MASSIVE: Claims that NANCY PELOSI was warned about a serious security risk and still kept SWALWELL in a sensitive role raise HUGE questions. National security isn’t partisan. It’s foundational. If there were warnings, why wasn’t action taken?

Michael Carbonara

53,436 subscribers

64,021 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 次观看 • 9 个月前

Bret Baier: There’s a lot of concern about China, they own 384 THOUSAND acres of American agricultural land… Is that a problem? Sec Rollins: This is a massive, MASSIVE challenge... It isn’t just a challenge for our farmers and our farmland. It’s a national security issue

Bret Baier: There’s a lot of concern about China, they own 384 THOUSAND acres of American agricultural land… Is that a problem? Sec Rollins: This is a massive, MASSIVE challenge... It isn’t just a challenge for our farmers and our farmland. It’s a national security issue

RT

19,285 次观看 • 1 年前

Joe Rogan: "Nancy Pelosi isn’t the only one making tons of money in the stock market. There’s a reason why that whole position for members of Congress to trade stocks is still there. It’s because they want it there."

Joe Rogan: "Nancy Pelosi isn’t the only one making tons of money in the stock market. There’s a reason why that whole position for members of Congress to trade stocks is still there. It’s because they want it there."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

67,706 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 HOLY SH*T! IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE: A BURIED CIA VIDEO JUST SURFACED… AND ERIKA KIRK IS IN IT A 10-year-old documentary about EMP attacks and U.S. power grid vulnerability has quietly surfaced - and buried inside it is Erika Kirk. She’s not observing. She’s not a host. She’s in a role most civilians never get near, briefing national security professionals alongside a former CIA National Security & Energy Specialist on how an EMP or coordinated physical attack could collapse the U.S. power grid. This isn’t casual footage. It’s technical. It’s inside-baseball. And it’s the exact kind of material most people never get near, let alone present. Which raises some very uncomfortable questions: Why was she in that role? What qualified her to brief on national security threats? Who brought her into that room, and why is none of it explained? Back then, this clip passed quietly. Today, with everything surrounding her, it hits very differently. At what point do “coincidences” stop being coincidences?

🚨 HOLY SH*T! IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE: A BURIED CIA VIDEO JUST SURFACED… AND ERIKA KIRK IS IN IT A 10-year-old documentary about EMP attacks and U.S. power grid vulnerability has quietly surfaced - and buried inside it is Erika Kirk. She’s not observing. She’s not a host. She’s in a role most civilians never get near, briefing national security professionals alongside a former CIA National Security & Energy Specialist on how an EMP or coordinated physical attack could collapse the U.S. power grid. This isn’t casual footage. It’s technical. It’s inside-baseball. And it’s the exact kind of material most people never get near, let alone present. Which raises some very uncomfortable questions: Why was she in that role? What qualified her to brief on national security threats? Who brought her into that room, and why is none of it explained? Back then, this clip passed quietly. Today, with everything surrounding her, it hits very differently. At what point do “coincidences” stop being coincidences?

HustleBitch

4,706,830 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 SECURITY WARNED. NO.10 IGNORED. STARMER OWNED THIS. 🚨 This is no longer speculation. This is confirmed reporting. According to Sky News, UK security services explicitly raised concerns about appointing Peter Mandelson as U.S. Ambassador. Those concerns were formally flagged. They were escalated. They were known. And yet Downing Street pressed ahead anyway. This is the moment **Keir Starmer’s premiership becomes untenable. Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: • Security services warned about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein • They insist they did their job and “ran it up the flagpole” • Number 10 overrode the warnings for political reasons • The appointment then collapsed in public disgrace • Mandelson was fired only after the exposure became impossible to contain This wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was a political decision. Sky’s reporting raises devastating questions: Who in No.10 made the final call? Why were security warnings dismissed? Did Starmer know — or was he shielded by his own Chief of Staff? If he did know, why did he proceed? If he didn’t, why is he not in control of his own government? Either scenario is catastrophic. The security services are now openly dismayed — not because they failed, but because they’re being blamed after being ignored. Meanwhile, MPs are described as “slack-jawed” at a Downing Street operation that has lost two senior figures in a week and defended Mandelson even after Epstein links were public — only to reverse course hours later. This is not a minor scandal. This is judgment failure at the very top of government. A Prime Minister who ignores security advice on sensitive diplomatic appointments —or who allows his inner circle to do so— cannot be trusted with the national interest. Starmer now owns this decision. He owns the override. He owns the consequences. And Britain is entitled to ask: If security warnings can be brushed aside this easily, who is really running the country?

🚨 SECURITY WARNED. NO.10 IGNORED. STARMER OWNED THIS. 🚨 This is no longer speculation. This is confirmed reporting. According to Sky News, UK security services explicitly raised concerns about appointing Peter Mandelson as U.S. Ambassador. Those concerns were formally flagged. They were escalated. They were known. And yet Downing Street pressed ahead anyway. This is the moment **Keir Starmer’s premiership becomes untenable. Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: • Security services warned about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein • They insist they did their job and “ran it up the flagpole” • Number 10 overrode the warnings for political reasons • The appointment then collapsed in public disgrace • Mandelson was fired only after the exposure became impossible to contain This wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was a political decision. Sky’s reporting raises devastating questions: Who in No.10 made the final call? Why were security warnings dismissed? Did Starmer know — or was he shielded by his own Chief of Staff? If he did know, why did he proceed? If he didn’t, why is he not in control of his own government? Either scenario is catastrophic. The security services are now openly dismayed — not because they failed, but because they’re being blamed after being ignored. Meanwhile, MPs are described as “slack-jawed” at a Downing Street operation that has lost two senior figures in a week and defended Mandelson even after Epstein links were public — only to reverse course hours later. This is not a minor scandal. This is judgment failure at the very top of government. A Prime Minister who ignores security advice on sensitive diplomatic appointments —or who allows his inner circle to do so— cannot be trusted with the national interest. Starmer now owns this decision. He owns the override. He owns the consequences. And Britain is entitled to ask: If security warnings can be brushed aside this easily, who is really running the country?

Jim Ferguson

85,588 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is why Nancy Pelosi didn’t want Trump to call in the National Guard, because if he had done that he would have found out there was 274 Agents deployed in the crowd and would have easily been able to Prove it was a setup!

This is why Nancy Pelosi didn’t want Trump to call in the National Guard, because if he had done that he would have found out there was 274 Agents deployed in the crowd and would have easily been able to Prove it was a setup!

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

17,274 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES. W.H.G

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES. W.H.G

W.H.Grampa

350,273 次观看 • 26 天前

🚨 ERIKA KIRK CANCELS OVER “SECURITY THREAT” — SECRET SERVICE SAYS IT NEVER EXISTED… SO WHAT IS SHE HIDING? Something isn’t adding up. Here’s what we know: • Erika Kirk was scheduled to appear at a TPUSA event alongside JD Vance • Just before the event, she pulls out citing “security concerns” • The event still goes on with Vance speaking to a reportedly ~25% full arena • He’s even heckled during the speech Now here’s where it gets strange: • Reports say no credible threat was ever identified • No alert, warning, or action from Secret Service • And the Vice President still took the stage anyway So think about that: If there was a real security threat… why would Vance still speak? And if there wasn’t one… why was Kirk pulled from the lineup at the last second? Does this sound like a security issue… or a cover story?

🚨 ERIKA KIRK CANCELS OVER “SECURITY THREAT” — SECRET SERVICE SAYS IT NEVER EXISTED… SO WHAT IS SHE HIDING? Something isn’t adding up. Here’s what we know: • Erika Kirk was scheduled to appear at a TPUSA event alongside JD Vance • Just before the event, she pulls out citing “security concerns” • The event still goes on with Vance speaking to a reportedly ~25% full arena • He’s even heckled during the speech Now here’s where it gets strange: • Reports say no credible threat was ever identified • No alert, warning, or action from Secret Service • And the Vice President still took the stage anyway So think about that: If there was a real security threat… why would Vance still speak? And if there wasn’t one… why was Kirk pulled from the lineup at the last second? Does this sound like a security issue… or a cover story?

HustleBitch

18,184 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 NANCY PELOSI JUST FORCED ERIC SWALWELL OUT According to reports, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi personally called Eric Swalwell on Friday night and told him: “You’ve got to drop out of the governor’s race… and you should resign from Congress.” Pelosi made it crystal clear, the s*xual misconduct scandal was too toxic, even for him. When asked about it yesterday, Pelosi said: “If you have a challenge that you have to address, it’s best addressed not as a candidate for governor and not as a member of Congress.”

🚨 NANCY PELOSI JUST FORCED ERIC SWALWELL OUT According to reports, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi personally called Eric Swalwell on Friday night and told him: “You’ve got to drop out of the governor’s race… and you should resign from Congress.” Pelosi made it crystal clear, the s*xual misconduct scandal was too toxic, even for him. When asked about it yesterday, Pelosi said: “If you have a challenge that you have to address, it’s best addressed not as a candidate for governor and not as a member of Congress.”

Gunther Eagleman™

215,302 次观看 • 3 个月前

The big question is WHY? Why did Trump take the documents? WHY? Why did he keep them? WHY? Why is he lying about it? WHY? There is a potential serious national security issue here -- and that is something he is trying desperately to make sure we don't talk about. #TrumpIndicted

The big question is WHY? Why did Trump take the documents? WHY? Why did he keep them? WHY? Why is he lying about it? WHY? There is a potential serious national security issue here -- and that is something he is trying desperately to make sure we don't talk about. #TrumpIndicted

Van Jones

294,812 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨 THIS IS A MASSIVE CRISIS 🚨 “This is bigger than heavy metals—bigger than most people realize.” The spraying isn’t random; it’s framed as climate intervention and pushed through national security channels to avoid tracking, tracing, or challenges. 💼 Global finance giants 🏛️ Government partnerships 🛰️ Military & intelligence agencies 🌍 Global governance projects When climate change was declared a national security emergency, everything changed: spraying accelerated, oversight disappeared, and accountability vanished. This isn’t speculation to ignore—it’s a warning to examine closely.

🚨 THIS IS A MASSIVE CRISIS 🚨 “This is bigger than heavy metals—bigger than most people realize.” The spraying isn’t random; it’s framed as climate intervention and pushed through national security channels to avoid tracking, tracing, or challenges. 💼 Global finance giants 🏛️ Government partnerships 🛰️ Military & intelligence agencies 🌍 Global governance projects When climate change was declared a national security emergency, everything changed: spraying accelerated, oversight disappeared, and accountability vanished. This isn’t speculation to ignore—it’s a warning to examine closely.

Tom Renz

101,715 次观看 • 6 个月前

I spoke with Peter Schweizer about his #1 New York Times bestseller "The Invisible Coup" and how mass migration is being weaponized against the United States by foreign adversaries and domestic elites. We discussed historical warnings like the Mariel boatlift, the role of foreign governments in influencing U.S. policy, and why issues like birthright and dual citizenship raise serious national security concerns.

I spoke with Peter Schweizer about his #1 New York Times bestseller "The Invisible Coup" and how mass migration is being weaponized against the United States by foreign adversaries and domestic elites. We discussed historical warnings like the Mariel boatlift, the role of foreign governments in influencing U.S. policy, and why issues like birthright and dual citizenship raise serious national security concerns.

Newt Gingrich

24,833 次观看 • 5 个月前

Listen to Nikki Haley: “Last night, Trump is at a rally and he’s going on and on mentioning me multiple times as to why I didn’t take security during the Capitol riots. Why I didn’t handle January 6 better." “I wasn’t even in DC on January 6. They’re saying he got confused. That he was talking about something else. He was talking about Nancy Pelosi.” “He mentioned me multiple times in that scenario.”

Listen to Nikki Haley: “Last night, Trump is at a rally and he’s going on and on mentioning me multiple times as to why I didn’t take security during the Capitol riots. Why I didn’t handle January 6 better." “I wasn’t even in DC on January 6. They’re saying he got confused. That he was talking about something else. He was talking about Nancy Pelosi.” “He mentioned me multiple times in that scenario.”

Brian Krassenstein

1,337,758 次观看 • 2 年前

This is not about politics. This is about nation and national security. What Pawan Kalyan asking is true. 👏🏼👏🏼 Today it is illegal rice smuggling. What if smuggling happens for drugs, illegal weapons and RDX tomorrow? It’s a national security risk. There are 12 ships. Seize them all. Will take it up with Home ministry.💪🏼💪🏼👌🏼 Now you know why so many drugs were entering and leaving AP during last crypto Jagan’s rule. In the name of rice smuggling, they were smuggling drugs. Same kind of sudden inspection should happen in TamilNadu ports as well. Rumours are that the DY CM there who wants to eradicate #SanatanaDharma is involved in Drugs smuggling. K.Annamalai APR

This is not about politics. This is about nation and national security. What Pawan Kalyan asking is true. 👏🏼👏🏼 Today it is illegal rice smuggling. What if smuggling happens for drugs, illegal weapons and RDX tomorrow? It’s a national security risk. There are 12 ships. Seize them all. Will take it up with Home ministry.💪🏼💪🏼👌🏼 Now you know why so many drugs were entering and leaving AP during last crypto Jagan’s rule. In the name of rice smuggling, they were smuggling drugs. Same kind of sudden inspection should happen in TamilNadu ports as well. Rumours are that the DY CM there who wants to eradicate #SanatanaDharma is involved in Drugs smuggling. K.Annamalai APR

Tathvam-asi

120,913 次观看 • 1 年前

Nancy Pelosi Has Been Caught Insider Trading For Decades Nancy Pelosi becomes unhinged when a reporter on 60 minutes dares question Pelosi about her and her husband trading on insider information and major legislation they were passing Reporter “I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. In a time, there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the house. Did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?” Reporter “Well, I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for a Speaker to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal?” Nancy Pelosi “Well, we did” Reporter “At that time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or had the appearance of a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “It only has appearance if you decide that” This is a must watch, Nancy Pelosi is one of the worst criminals this country has ever seen. No charges, no felonies, no arrests. This is America’s Two-Tier Justice System.

Nancy Pelosi Has Been Caught Insider Trading For Decades Nancy Pelosi becomes unhinged when a reporter on 60 minutes dares question Pelosi about her and her husband trading on insider information and major legislation they were passing Reporter “I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. In a time, there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the house. Did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?” Reporter “Well, I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for a Speaker to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal?” Nancy Pelosi “Well, we did” Reporter “At that time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or had the appearance of a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “It only has appearance if you decide that” This is a must watch, Nancy Pelosi is one of the worst criminals this country has ever seen. No charges, no felonies, no arrests. This is America’s Two-Tier Justice System.

Wall Street Apes

1,601,304 次观看 • 2 年前