Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 THIS IS MASSIVE: Claims that NANCY PELOSI was warned about a serious security risk and still kept SWALWELL in a sensitive role raise HUGE questions. National security isn’t partisan. It’s foundational. If there were warnings, why wasn’t action taken?

Michael Carbonara

53,436 subscribers

64,021 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Sağlık & İyilik Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The allegations involving a Canadian accused of espionage while working at NATO’s military headquarters raise serious questions about our security screening processes. That is why I supported our Conservative motion for the Public Safety and National Security Committee to undertake a study into Canada’s security screening processes. WATCH👇

The allegations involving a Canadian accused of espionage while working at NATO’s military headquarters raise serious questions about our security screening processes. That is why I supported our Conservative motion for the Public Safety and National Security Committee to undertake a study into Canada’s security screening processes. WATCH👇

Rhonda Kirkland

15,129 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Joe Rogan: "Nancy Pelosi isn’t the only one making tons of money in the stock market. There’s a reason why that whole position for members of Congress to trade stocks is still there. It’s because they want it there."

Joe Rogan: "Nancy Pelosi isn’t the only one making tons of money in the stock market. There’s a reason why that whole position for members of Congress to trade stocks is still there. It’s because they want it there."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

67,706 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 HOLY SH*T! IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE: A BURIED CIA VIDEO JUST SURFACED… AND ERIKA KIRK IS IN IT A 10-year-old documentary about EMP attacks and U.S. power grid vulnerability has quietly surfaced - and buried inside it is Erika Kirk. She’s not observing. She’s not a host. She’s in a role most civilians never get near, briefing national security professionals alongside a former CIA National Security & Energy Specialist on how an EMP or coordinated physical attack could collapse the U.S. power grid. This isn’t casual footage. It’s technical. It’s inside-baseball. And it’s the exact kind of material most people never get near, let alone present. Which raises some very uncomfortable questions: Why was she in that role? What qualified her to brief on national security threats? Who brought her into that room, and why is none of it explained? Back then, this clip passed quietly. Today, with everything surrounding her, it hits very differently. At what point do “coincidences” stop being coincidences?

🚨 HOLY SH*T! IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE: A BURIED CIA VIDEO JUST SURFACED… AND ERIKA KIRK IS IN IT A 10-year-old documentary about EMP attacks and U.S. power grid vulnerability has quietly surfaced - and buried inside it is Erika Kirk. She’s not observing. She’s not a host. She’s in a role most civilians never get near, briefing national security professionals alongside a former CIA National Security & Energy Specialist on how an EMP or coordinated physical attack could collapse the U.S. power grid. This isn’t casual footage. It’s technical. It’s inside-baseball. And it’s the exact kind of material most people never get near, let alone present. Which raises some very uncomfortable questions: Why was she in that role? What qualified her to brief on national security threats? Who brought her into that room, and why is none of it explained? Back then, this clip passed quietly. Today, with everything surrounding her, it hits very differently. At what point do “coincidences” stop being coincidences?

HustleBitch

4,713,377 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨 SECURITY WARNED. NO.10 IGNORED. STARMER OWNED THIS. 🚨 This is no longer speculation. This is confirmed reporting. According to Sky News, UK security services explicitly raised concerns about appointing Peter Mandelson as U.S. Ambassador. Those concerns were formally flagged. They were escalated. They were known. And yet Downing Street pressed ahead anyway. This is the moment **Keir Starmer’s premiership becomes untenable. Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: • Security services warned about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein • They insist they did their job and “ran it up the flagpole” • Number 10 overrode the warnings for political reasons • The appointment then collapsed in public disgrace • Mandelson was fired only after the exposure became impossible to contain This wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was a political decision. Sky’s reporting raises devastating questions: Who in No.10 made the final call? Why were security warnings dismissed? Did Starmer know — or was he shielded by his own Chief of Staff? If he did know, why did he proceed? If he didn’t, why is he not in control of his own government? Either scenario is catastrophic. The security services are now openly dismayed — not because they failed, but because they’re being blamed after being ignored. Meanwhile, MPs are described as “slack-jawed” at a Downing Street operation that has lost two senior figures in a week and defended Mandelson even after Epstein links were public — only to reverse course hours later. This is not a minor scandal. This is judgment failure at the very top of government. A Prime Minister who ignores security advice on sensitive diplomatic appointments —or who allows his inner circle to do so— cannot be trusted with the national interest. Starmer now owns this decision. He owns the override. He owns the consequences. And Britain is entitled to ask: If security warnings can be brushed aside this easily, who is really running the country?

🚨 SECURITY WARNED. NO.10 IGNORED. STARMER OWNED THIS. 🚨 This is no longer speculation. This is confirmed reporting. According to Sky News, UK security services explicitly raised concerns about appointing Peter Mandelson as U.S. Ambassador. Those concerns were formally flagged. They were escalated. They were known. And yet Downing Street pressed ahead anyway. This is the moment **Keir Starmer’s premiership becomes untenable. Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: • Security services warned about Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein • They insist they did their job and “ran it up the flagpole” • Number 10 overrode the warnings for political reasons • The appointment then collapsed in public disgrace • Mandelson was fired only after the exposure became impossible to contain This wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was a political decision. Sky’s reporting raises devastating questions: Who in No.10 made the final call? Why were security warnings dismissed? Did Starmer know — or was he shielded by his own Chief of Staff? If he did know, why did he proceed? If he didn’t, why is he not in control of his own government? Either scenario is catastrophic. The security services are now openly dismayed — not because they failed, but because they’re being blamed after being ignored. Meanwhile, MPs are described as “slack-jawed” at a Downing Street operation that has lost two senior figures in a week and defended Mandelson even after Epstein links were public — only to reverse course hours later. This is not a minor scandal. This is judgment failure at the very top of government. A Prime Minister who ignores security advice on sensitive diplomatic appointments —or who allows his inner circle to do so— cannot be trusted with the national interest. Starmer now owns this decision. He owns the override. He owns the consequences. And Britain is entitled to ask: If security warnings can be brushed aside this easily, who is really running the country?

Jim Ferguson

85,588 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

H-1B isn’t just an economic issue. It’s a NATIONAL SECURITY issue! Why are we replacing American workers with cheaper foreign labor, including workers from the CCP, in our technology sectors?! This isn’t about a “skilled worker shortage.” It’s about corporations protecting their bottom line. American workers and American security come FIRST!

H-1B isn’t just an economic issue. It’s a NATIONAL SECURITY issue! Why are we replacing American workers with cheaper foreign labor, including workers from the CCP, in our technology sectors?! This isn’t about a “skilled worker shortage.” It’s about corporations protecting their bottom line. American workers and American security come FIRST!

Congressman Greg Steube

19,470 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES. W.H.G

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES. W.H.G

W.H.Grampa

351,411 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️

57,321 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

Wiki Leaks 1.0

59,739 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

🚨 ERIKA KIRK CANCELS OVER “SECURITY THREAT” — SECRET SERVICE SAYS IT NEVER EXISTED… SO WHAT IS SHE HIDING? Something isn’t adding up. Here’s what we know: • Erika Kirk was scheduled to appear at a TPUSA event alongside JD Vance • Just before the event, she pulls out citing “security concerns” • The event still goes on with Vance speaking to a reportedly ~25% full arena • He’s even heckled during the speech Now here’s where it gets strange: • Reports say no credible threat was ever identified • No alert, warning, or action from Secret Service • And the Vice President still took the stage anyway So think about that: If there was a real security threat… why would Vance still speak? And if there wasn’t one… why was Kirk pulled from the lineup at the last second? Does this sound like a security issue… or a cover story?

🚨 ERIKA KIRK CANCELS OVER “SECURITY THREAT” — SECRET SERVICE SAYS IT NEVER EXISTED… SO WHAT IS SHE HIDING? Something isn’t adding up. Here’s what we know: • Erika Kirk was scheduled to appear at a TPUSA event alongside JD Vance • Just before the event, she pulls out citing “security concerns” • The event still goes on with Vance speaking to a reportedly ~25% full arena • He’s even heckled during the speech Now here’s where it gets strange: • Reports say no credible threat was ever identified • No alert, warning, or action from Secret Service • And the Vice President still took the stage anyway So think about that: If there was a real security threat… why would Vance still speak? And if there wasn’t one… why was Kirk pulled from the lineup at the last second? Does this sound like a security issue… or a cover story?

HustleBitch

18,184 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

🚨 CANADA JUST CROSSED A RED LINE Canada has officially opened a new EXPRESS ENTRY pathway for FOREIGN MILITARY RECRUITS to join the CANADIAN ARMED FORCES. Yes, you read that right. The government says it’s about protecting Canada’s sovereignty. Critics argue it’s putting military power into the hands of people who AREN’T EVEN CANADIAN. This isn’t just another immigration policy—it’s a move that raises serious questions about Canada’s future and national security. IT COULD ALSO BE A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.

John F Kennedy Jr

90,756 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

🚨 NANCY PELOSI JUST FORCED ERIC SWALWELL OUT According to reports, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi personally called Eric Swalwell on Friday night and told him: “You’ve got to drop out of the governor’s race… and you should resign from Congress.” Pelosi made it crystal clear, the s*xual misconduct scandal was too toxic, even for him. When asked about it yesterday, Pelosi said: “If you have a challenge that you have to address, it’s best addressed not as a candidate for governor and not as a member of Congress.”

🚨 NANCY PELOSI JUST FORCED ERIC SWALWELL OUT According to reports, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi personally called Eric Swalwell on Friday night and told him: “You’ve got to drop out of the governor’s race… and you should resign from Congress.” Pelosi made it crystal clear, the s*xual misconduct scandal was too toxic, even for him. When asked about it yesterday, Pelosi said: “If you have a challenge that you have to address, it’s best addressed not as a candidate for governor and not as a member of Congress.”

Gunther Eagleman™

215,302 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The big question is WHY? Why did Trump take the documents? WHY? Why did he keep them? WHY? Why is he lying about it? WHY? There is a potential serious national security issue here -- and that is something he is trying desperately to make sure we don't talk about. #TrumpIndicted

The big question is WHY? Why did Trump take the documents? WHY? Why did he keep them? WHY? Why is he lying about it? WHY? There is a potential serious national security issue here -- and that is something he is trying desperately to make sure we don't talk about. #TrumpIndicted

Van Jones

294,813 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

🚨 THIS IS A MASSIVE CRISIS 🚨 “This is bigger than heavy metals—bigger than most people realize.” The spraying isn’t random; it’s framed as climate intervention and pushed through national security channels to avoid tracking, tracing, or challenges. 💼 Global finance giants 🏛️ Government partnerships 🛰️ Military & intelligence agencies 🌍 Global governance projects When climate change was declared a national security emergency, everything changed: spraying accelerated, oversight disappeared, and accountability vanished. This isn’t speculation to ignore—it’s a warning to examine closely.

🚨 THIS IS A MASSIVE CRISIS 🚨 “This is bigger than heavy metals—bigger than most people realize.” The spraying isn’t random; it’s framed as climate intervention and pushed through national security channels to avoid tracking, tracing, or challenges. 💼 Global finance giants 🏛️ Government partnerships 🛰️ Military & intelligence agencies 🌍 Global governance projects When climate change was declared a national security emergency, everything changed: spraying accelerated, oversight disappeared, and accountability vanished. This isn’t speculation to ignore—it’s a warning to examine closely.

Tom Renz

101,739 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

I spoke with Peter Schweizer about his #1 New York Times bestseller "The Invisible Coup" and how mass migration is being weaponized against the United States by foreign adversaries and domestic elites. We discussed historical warnings like the Mariel boatlift, the role of foreign governments in influencing U.S. policy, and why issues like birthright and dual citizenship raise serious national security concerns.

I spoke with Peter Schweizer about his #1 New York Times bestseller "The Invisible Coup" and how mass migration is being weaponized against the United States by foreign adversaries and domestic elites. We discussed historical warnings like the Mariel boatlift, the role of foreign governments in influencing U.S. policy, and why issues like birthright and dual citizenship raise serious national security concerns.

Newt Gingrich

24,833 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce