Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This is next level incompetence on display with this one. Walmart AP and local sheriff mistake one Asian man for a different Asian man and the wrongful arrest gets them in a 10 million dollar lawsuit. Tony Nguyen was shopping with his girlfriend, Lauren Caldwell, at a Walmart in... Spring Hill, Florida, when an asset protection specialist named David Pettigrew mistakenly identified him as Cody Vanderland—a known shoplifter who had been legally banned from the store for trespassing and was flagged as potentially violent. Pettigrew immediately called the police. Hernando County Deputy Michael McNeely arrived at the scene and immediately placed Nguyen under arrest. Despite repeated pleas from Nguyen and his girlfriend explaining that he was just grocery shopping and that this was a mistake, Deputy McNeely failed to perform the most basic step of police protocol: he never asked Nguyen for his name or requested to see his identification before putting him in handcuffs. It wasn’t until Nguyen arrived at the Hernando County jail for processing that the deputy finally checked his ID and realized they had the wrong man. McNeely apologized and prepared to drive Nguyen home—but the nightmare wasn't over. While en route, McNeely’s supervisor requested a photo of Nguyen’s ID. The supervisor discovered that Nguyen actually had a trespassing warning at that exact same Walmart from 10 years prior. Even though Nguyen had been told in court a decade ago that the warning would only last for one year, the supervisor ordered the deputy to turn the cruiser around, take Nguyen back to jail, and officially book him. While prosecutors dropped the trespassing charges just two months later, Nguyen filed a federal lawsuit seeking $10 million in damages, citing racial profiling, false imprisonment, and false arrest. The case (Nguyen v. Walmart Inc. et al.) moved through the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. After intense litigation, Nguyen reached a settlement with Walmart and the loss prevention specialist, leading to their dismissal from the case. Following further legal resolutions with the deputy involved, the entire federal lawsuit was officially closed and terminated. In the end this error cost the tax payers of this county and Walmart an undisclosed payout amount for their incompetence.show more

Giggling Ganon

225,899 subscribers

94,830 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Tennessee Woman Sues Mercedes-Benz Dealership After Employee Took Her C300 AMG on Unauthorized Date Night Joyride While It Was in for Repairs Kimberly Porter dropped off her Mercedes-Benz C300 AMG at a dealership in December for servicing. On January 16, she got GPS alerts saying her car was moving. She drove a loaner vehicle to the location and found her car in a parking lot. She waited and watched. When the dealership employee returned, she called police. The man, later identified as Derrick Nguyen, told police he'd been out on a date. Nguyen was arrested and charged with theft of property.Porter alleges that after his arrest, dealership representatives pressured her to drop the charges and threatened to report the loaner as stolen. Porter is now suing both Nguyen and the dealership.

Tennessee Woman Sues Mercedes-Benz Dealership After Employee Took Her C300 AMG on Unauthorized Date Night Joyride While It Was in for Repairs Kimberly Porter dropped off her Mercedes-Benz C300 AMG at a dealership in December for servicing. On January 16, she got GPS alerts saying her car was moving. She drove a loaner vehicle to the location and found her car in a parking lot. She waited and watched. When the dealership employee returned, she called police. The man, later identified as Derrick Nguyen, told police he'd been out on a date. Nguyen was arrested and charged with theft of property.Porter alleges that after his arrest, dealership representatives pressured her to drop the charges and threatened to report the loaner as stolen. Porter is now suing both Nguyen and the dealership.

LASHY BILLS

531,663 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

NEW: Couple attacked at home by robbers posing as buyers to an online ad Jason Nguyen listed an expensive laptop for sale and arranged a meetup at his home Two men arrived and appeared ready to complete the transaction “They sprayed all across my face, towards the eye, and at that point, I’m just acting reactively.” Nguyen refused to let go until he was sure his wife was safe “I was being dragged out. I was getting hit in the head, punched in the ribs and then also kicked, and I got dragged down to that step down there.” Calgary police urged sellers to meet buyers in public, monitored locations

NEW: Couple attacked at home by robbers posing as buyers to an online ad Jason Nguyen listed an expensive laptop for sale and arranged a meetup at his home Two men arrived and appeared ready to complete the transaction “They sprayed all across my face, towards the eye, and at that point, I’m just acting reactively.” Nguyen refused to let go until he was sure his wife was safe “I was being dragged out. I was getting hit in the head, punched in the ribs and then also kicked, and I got dragged down to that step down there.” Calgary police urged sellers to meet buyers in public, monitored locations

Unlimited L's

379,813 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Caught on camera in Nashville: A sheriff’s deputy attempts to arrest a man battling stage 2 cancer after the man was allegedly caught stealing clothes from Walmart. According to caption of the video Walmart on Dickerson Pike The Guy Came Out of Walmart and the sheriff tazed/ kicked/ tackled him. The sheriff said that the guy had stolen some clothes from Walmart but no le da derecho de maltratarlo de esa manera. I really didn't catch the guys name but he's a 47 year old male and has stage 2 cancer. The black male was resisting the arrest while the sheriff was hitting him and tazing him. After that the police and ambulance was called and when they arrived a cop asked what happened and a group of black woman were explaining what happened and the police said I don't understand I need a better version and a white Male spoke to the police and the police said I got it thank you and left Credit Yamelex/SAHM on TikTok

Caught on camera in Nashville: A sheriff’s deputy attempts to arrest a man battling stage 2 cancer after the man was allegedly caught stealing clothes from Walmart. According to caption of the video Walmart on Dickerson Pike The Guy Came Out of Walmart and the sheriff tazed/ kicked/ tackled him. The sheriff said that the guy had stolen some clothes from Walmart but no le da derecho de maltratarlo de esa manera. I really didn't catch the guys name but he's a 47 year old male and has stage 2 cancer. The black male was resisting the arrest while the sheriff was hitting him and tazing him. After that the police and ambulance was called and when they arrived a cop asked what happened and a group of black woman were explaining what happened and the police said I don't understand I need a better version and a white Male spoke to the police and the police said I got it thank you and left Credit Yamelex/SAHM on TikTok

LASHY BILLS

16,034 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

$This one is crazy. If ever there was a case that you could point to as police brutality, this one is it. It’s early morning in Paulding County, Georgia. 29-year-old Tyler Canaris is doing what millions of us do every day—he’s waiting for his ride to work. Tyler is a landscaper, minding his own business, when Deputy Michael McMaster pulls up. In the blink of an eye Tyler Canaris was body-slammed so hard by Paulding County Deputy Michael McMaster that his skull fractured. Tyler was an innocent man waiting for his ride to work. He didn't have a weapon. He wasn't committing a crime. After the slam you can hear Tyler is in pain. Instead of offering help, McMaster mocked him and told him to shut up and act like a man. One of the most disturbing parts of this case is how long it took for consequences to arrive. For nearly a year, the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office did nothing. McMaster remained on the force, and Tyler was the one facing criminal charges for "obstruction." It wasn't until the GBI stepped in—that McMaster was finally fired. But even then, the department claimed he was fired for "policy violations" unrelated to the GBI’s use-of-force investigation. No Charges to this day, Michael McMaster has not been criminally charged for the injuries he inflicted on Tyler. Despite a GBI investigation, no indictment has been handed down. While Tyler lives with metal plates in his body and $75,000 in debt, the man who put him there remains a free man. Tyler filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Section 1983) seeking accountability. However, the path to justice hit a major wall: Parts of the case faced significant hurdles in District Court, as his case was dismissed by the district court with prejudice. In early 2026, the case moved to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Tyler’s legal team is fighting to overturn rulings that have stalled his pursuit of damages. As of right now, the court is still processing briefs, meaning Tyler is years away from a potential settlement or trial. What is your take on this case, I look forward to reading your comments below.$

This one is crazy. If ever there was a case that you could point to as police brutality, this one is it. It’s early morning in Paulding County, Georgia. 29-year-old Tyler Canaris is doing what millions of us do every day—he’s waiting for his ride to work. Tyler is a landscaper, minding his own business, when Deputy Michael McMaster pulls up. In the blink of an eye Tyler Canaris was body-slammed so hard by Paulding County Deputy Michael McMaster that his skull fractured. Tyler was an innocent man waiting for his ride to work. He didn't have a weapon. He wasn't committing a crime. After the slam you can hear Tyler is in pain. Instead of offering help, McMaster mocked him and told him to shut up and act like a man. One of the most disturbing parts of this case is how long it took for consequences to arrive. For nearly a year, the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office did nothing. McMaster remained on the force, and Tyler was the one facing criminal charges for "obstruction." It wasn't until the GBI stepped in—that McMaster was finally fired. But even then, the department claimed he was fired for "policy violations" unrelated to the GBI’s use-of-force investigation. No Charges to this day, Michael McMaster has not been criminally charged for the injuries he inflicted on Tyler. Despite a GBI investigation, no indictment has been handed down. While Tyler lives with metal plates in his body and $75,000 in debt, the man who put him there remains a free man. Tyler filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Section 1983) seeking accountability. However, the path to justice hit a major wall: Parts of the case faced significant hurdles in District Court, as his case was dismissed by the district court with prejudice. In early 2026, the case moved to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Tyler’s legal team is fighting to overturn rulings that have stalled his pursuit of damages. As of right now, the court is still processing briefs, meaning Tyler is years away from a potential settlement or trial. What is your take on this case, I look forward to reading your comments below.

Giggling Ganon

54,069 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Officers from the Fort Myers Police Department in Florida were dispatched to a local Hooters restaurant. The manager had called the police to request that a male customer be formally trespassed from the property. According to the manager, the customer had been causing a disturbance the previous week by "running his mouth" to staff and other patrons. Although he was asked to leave multiple times during that prior incident, he initially refused, only fleeing when the manager went inside to call the police. One week later, the man returned to the restaurant, prompting management to call law enforcement to have him officially banned. When officers approached the man at the bar, they informed him that management wanted him trespassed. The situation quickly became tense as the customer grew highly argumentative. He began hurling verbal insults at the business manager. He repeatedly questioned why he was being forced to leave and continues to cause a disturbance. The officers repeatedly warned him to calm down, settle his tab, and stop creating a disturbance, noting that his disruptive behavior could escalate the situation into an arrest for causing a scene or breach of peace. After the man finally handed over his information to settle his bill and process the trespass warning, officers ran his name through their database. The system flagged an active, outstanding county warrant for his arrest. When officers went to place him in handcuffs, the man was shocked, repeatedly asking what the warrant was for. Officers informed him that the system indicated a charge related to the illegal possession of a firearm. The man strongly denied the charge, claiming: He had never been stopped or caught with a firearm. He did not own any firearms. He had an employee waiting outside who could drive his work truck home. The responding officers maintained a professional demeanor, explaining that while the warrant was confirmed in their system, a secondary verification process—including a fingerprint match—would be conducted at the county booking facility to ensure he was indeed the correct individual listed on the warrant. He was then placed into the police cruiser and transported to jail. There are no current public updates to this arrest available.

Officers from the Fort Myers Police Department in Florida were dispatched to a local Hooters restaurant. The manager had called the police to request that a male customer be formally trespassed from the property. According to the manager, the customer had been causing a disturbance the previous week by "running his mouth" to staff and other patrons. Although he was asked to leave multiple times during that prior incident, he initially refused, only fleeing when the manager went inside to call the police. One week later, the man returned to the restaurant, prompting management to call law enforcement to have him officially banned. When officers approached the man at the bar, they informed him that management wanted him trespassed. The situation quickly became tense as the customer grew highly argumentative. He began hurling verbal insults at the business manager. He repeatedly questioned why he was being forced to leave and continues to cause a disturbance. The officers repeatedly warned him to calm down, settle his tab, and stop creating a disturbance, noting that his disruptive behavior could escalate the situation into an arrest for causing a scene or breach of peace. After the man finally handed over his information to settle his bill and process the trespass warning, officers ran his name through their database. The system flagged an active, outstanding county warrant for his arrest. When officers went to place him in handcuffs, the man was shocked, repeatedly asking what the warrant was for. Officers informed him that the system indicated a charge related to the illegal possession of a firearm. The man strongly denied the charge, claiming: He had never been stopped or caught with a firearm. He did not own any firearms. He had an employee waiting outside who could drive his work truck home. The responding officers maintained a professional demeanor, explaining that while the warrant was confirmed in their system, a secondary verification process—including a fingerprint match—would be conducted at the county booking facility to ensure he was indeed the correct individual listed on the warrant. He was then placed into the police cruiser and transported to jail. There are no current public updates to this arrest available.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

496,079 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

For years Walmart made $300 MILLION sending demand letters to people accused of shoplifting. Many were never convicted. Some were never guilty. One of them refused to pay and a jury gave her $2.1 MILLION. – Lesleigh Nurse was a mother of three from Semmes, Alabama. – In November 2016 she went to her local Walmart with her husband and three children. – She used the self-checkout but the scanner froze. – A Walmart associate came over and helped her through it. She left thinking everything was resolved. – An asset protection manager stopped her outside. She was accused of stealing 11 items including Christmas lights, a loaf of bread and a box of Cap'n Crunch with a total value to about $48. – She was arrested for shoplifting. – A year later the criminal case was dismissed after the Walmart employee failed to appear in court. – One month later a Florida law firm sent her a letter on behalf of Walmart. – Pay $200 or face a civil lawsuit. The demand was even more than the groceries she was accused of stealing. – She refused and in her words “I didn't do anything wrong. Why would I pay for something I didn't do?" – During the trial that followed a law professor testified that in a two year period Walmart had charged 1.4 MILLION people across America with criminal theft and collected $300 MILLION through these demand letters. – Many had never been convicted. Some had never been guilty. – Walmart never produced the self-checkout surveillance footage that would have proved whether she stole anything or not. – "It would have shown the truth and they didn't want the truth to be shown," she said. – A Mobile County jury unanimously awarded her $2.1 MILLION in November 2021. – Walmart filed a motion asking the court to throw out the verdict entirely. Next time your self-checkout scanner freezes at Walmart remember there is a system built to send you a bill whether you are guilty or not. 1.4 million people paid it. She was the one who said no.

For years Walmart made $300 MILLION sending demand letters to people accused of shoplifting. Many were never convicted. Some were never guilty. One of them refused to pay and a jury gave her $2.1 MILLION. – Lesleigh Nurse was a mother of three from Semmes, Alabama. – In November 2016 she went to her local Walmart with her husband and three children. – She used the self-checkout but the scanner froze. – A Walmart associate came over and helped her through it. She left thinking everything was resolved. – An asset protection manager stopped her outside. She was accused of stealing 11 items including Christmas lights, a loaf of bread and a box of Cap'n Crunch with a total value to about $48. – She was arrested for shoplifting. – A year later the criminal case was dismissed after the Walmart employee failed to appear in court. – One month later a Florida law firm sent her a letter on behalf of Walmart. – Pay $200 or face a civil lawsuit. The demand was even more than the groceries she was accused of stealing. – She refused and in her words “I didn't do anything wrong. Why would I pay for something I didn't do?" – During the trial that followed a law professor testified that in a two year period Walmart had charged 1.4 MILLION people across America with criminal theft and collected $300 MILLION through these demand letters. – Many had never been convicted. Some had never been guilty. – Walmart never produced the self-checkout surveillance footage that would have proved whether she stole anything or not. – "It would have shown the truth and they didn't want the truth to be shown," she said. – A Mobile County jury unanimously awarded her $2.1 MILLION in November 2021. – Walmart filed a motion asking the court to throw out the verdict entirely. Next time your self-checkout scanner freezes at Walmart remember there is a system built to send you a bill whether you are guilty or not. 1.4 million people paid it. She was the one who said no.

Aisar

1,213,832 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Leon County Sheriff Walt McNeilrevealed shared the information about the FSU shooter: “The shooter is 20-year-old Phoenix Ikner, and he’s a son of a Leon County Sheriff deputy. Our deputy, Deputy Ikner, has been with the Leon County Sheriff’s Office for over 18 years. She has a tremendous job that she’s done. Her service to this community has been exceptional. Unfortunately, her son had access to one of her weapons, and that was one of the weapons that was found at the scene.”

Leon County Sheriff Walt McNeilrevealed shared the information about the FSU shooter: “The shooter is 20-year-old Phoenix Ikner, and he’s a son of a Leon County Sheriff deputy. Our deputy, Deputy Ikner, has been with the Leon County Sheriff’s Office for over 18 years. She has a tremendous job that she’s done. Her service to this community has been exceptional. Unfortunately, her son had access to one of her weapons, and that was one of the weapons that was found at the scene.”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

106,101 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

- Tyler Robinson’s parents saw the surveillance photo and believed the shooter looked like their son. - They contacted him. He lied and said he had been home sick. - His parents recognized the rifle used as the same rifle they had given him. When they called him again, he "implied that he planned to take his own life." - When they confronted him in person, "Robinson implied that he was the shooter and stated that he couldn’t go to jail and just wanted to end it." - When asked why he did it, Robinson said Charlie Kirk "spreads too much hate." - They discussed turning himself in and convinced him to speak with a family friend who is a retired deputy sheriff. - Robinson admitted to that retired deputy that he had disposed of the clothes he wore during the shooting. - Robinson went with his parents and that retired deputy to turn himself in. You don’t think prosecutors will be able to back this up in court? - Recorded interviews with his parents and the retired deputy. - Cell phone records of those calls. - Location data. - Search history. - Recovery of the clothing he admitted disposing. And we already have his written confession: “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. It was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this. im surrendering through a sheriff friend in a few moments. thanks for all the good times and laughs.” Imagine the evidence that hasn't been released yet.

- Tyler Robinson’s parents saw the surveillance photo and believed the shooter looked like their son. - They contacted him. He lied and said he had been home sick. - His parents recognized the rifle used as the same rifle they had given him. When they called him again, he "implied that he planned to take his own life." - When they confronted him in person, "Robinson implied that he was the shooter and stated that he couldn’t go to jail and just wanted to end it." - When asked why he did it, Robinson said Charlie Kirk "spreads too much hate." - They discussed turning himself in and convinced him to speak with a family friend who is a retired deputy sheriff. - Robinson admitted to that retired deputy that he had disposed of the clothes he wore during the shooting. - Robinson went with his parents and that retired deputy to turn himself in. You don’t think prosecutors will be able to back this up in court? - Recorded interviews with his parents and the retired deputy. - Cell phone records of those calls. - Location data. - Search history. - Recovery of the clothing he admitted disposing. And we already have his written confession: “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. It was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this. im surrendering through a sheriff friend in a few moments. thanks for all the good times and laughs.” Imagine the evidence that hasn't been released yet.

KanekoaTheGreat

115,024 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Drunk male karen tried to square up on officer twice his size over an Uber dispute. It comically does not end well for him. Deputies in Charlotte County, Florida, received an urgent call from an Uber driver. She reported that her passenger, 52-year-old Eric Martel, had become incredibly aggressive and confrontational after she picked him up from a local bar. Fearing for her safety, the driver didn't hesitate—she immediately dropped Martel off in a nearby business parking lot and called 911. When deputies arrived minutes later, Martel initially allowed a pat-down for weapons, but the cooperation stopped there. Over the course of the interaction, his demeanor completely shifted into outright hostility. When property management requested that Martel be formally trespassed from the property, he flatly refused to leave. He repeatedly shouted obscenities, squared up with a sergeant, and accused the deputies of disrespecting him. The situation crossed the line when Martel looked directly at a deputy that was twice his size and told him he will need three of him to stop him. The deputy answered I doubt that. After multiple warnings to walk away and stop causing a public disturbance, deputies attempted to place Martel under arrest. Martel physically resisted, leading a deputy to deploy a Taser to safely bring him to the ground and secure him in handcuffs. If Martel had simply walked away when told to leave, he would have remained a free man. Instead, he was booked into the Charlotte County Jail on a heavy list of charges: Disorderly Intoxication Trespass After Warning Resisting an Officer Without Violence Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) You just knew as this built up that this guy was playing stupid games and it would only be a matter of time before he won his prize.

Drunk male karen tried to square up on officer twice his size over an Uber dispute. It comically does not end well for him. Deputies in Charlotte County, Florida, received an urgent call from an Uber driver. She reported that her passenger, 52-year-old Eric Martel, had become incredibly aggressive and confrontational after she picked him up from a local bar. Fearing for her safety, the driver didn't hesitate—she immediately dropped Martel off in a nearby business parking lot and called 911. When deputies arrived minutes later, Martel initially allowed a pat-down for weapons, but the cooperation stopped there. Over the course of the interaction, his demeanor completely shifted into outright hostility. When property management requested that Martel be formally trespassed from the property, he flatly refused to leave. He repeatedly shouted obscenities, squared up with a sergeant, and accused the deputies of disrespecting him. The situation crossed the line when Martel looked directly at a deputy that was twice his size and told him he will need three of him to stop him. The deputy answered I doubt that. After multiple warnings to walk away and stop causing a public disturbance, deputies attempted to place Martel under arrest. Martel physically resisted, leading a deputy to deploy a Taser to safely bring him to the ground and secure him in handcuffs. If Martel had simply walked away when told to leave, he would have remained a free man. Instead, he was booked into the Charlotte County Jail on a heavy list of charges: Disorderly Intoxication Trespass After Warning Resisting an Officer Without Violence Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) You just knew as this built up that this guy was playing stupid games and it would only be a matter of time before he won his prize.

Giggling Ganon

196,210 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

After this man spent over $300 at his local store. When he was leaving the store they asked to see his receipt, he declined. So they detained him and called the police. The police came and took his cart away from him and was pushing it back to the store. After they were going to arrest him for not leaving, he finally, finally shows the receipt and they let him take his stuff he bought. Usually if they ask to see it and you refuse, it’s not a huge deal. But in this instance he had many high priced items not in bags, you can see just the boxes in the cart. Maybe put a sign at the door that you will be checked if items over a certain dollar amount isn’t in a bag, would that be reasonable?

After this man spent over $300 at his local store. When he was leaving the store they asked to see his receipt, he declined. So they detained him and called the police. The police came and took his cart away from him and was pushing it back to the store. After they were going to arrest him for not leaving, he finally, finally shows the receipt and they let him take his stuff he bought. Usually if they ask to see it and you refuse, it’s not a huge deal. But in this instance he had many high priced items not in bags, you can see just the boxes in the cart. Maybe put a sign at the door that you will be checked if items over a certain dollar amount isn’t in a bag, would that be reasonable?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

2,762,487 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.

Giggling Ganon

50,797 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Man who Spent 16 Years Wrongfully in Prison, Gets killed by Police Shortly After Release. (Dashcam video below - I cut video short). Was the Officer in the right during this arrest? Leonard Allen Cure, was released from prison in April of 2020, and just this year was compensated with $817,000 for his wrongful imprisonment. Cure was recently pulled over in Georgia for speeding at 100 MPH on I-95. The officer went to arrest him. “Cure complied with the officer’s commands until learning that he was under arrest,” authorities said. “After not complying with the deputy’s requests, the deputy tased Cure. Cure assaulted the deputy. The deputy used the Taser for a second time and an ASP baton; however, Cure still did not comply. The deputy pulled out his gun and shot Cure. EMT’s treated Cure, but he later died.” Imagine being this guy's family. Having spent 16 years in prison for a crime he did not do, only to be shot and killed by police a few years after being released. My Opinion: The officer had few other options. He was being attacked and tried to defend himself with non-lethal means first. His firearm was his likely last hope.

Man who Spent 16 Years Wrongfully in Prison, Gets killed by Police Shortly After Release. (Dashcam video below - I cut video short). Was the Officer in the right during this arrest? Leonard Allen Cure, was released from prison in April of 2020, and just this year was compensated with $817,000 for his wrongful imprisonment. Cure was recently pulled over in Georgia for speeding at 100 MPH on I-95. The officer went to arrest him. “Cure complied with the officer’s commands until learning that he was under arrest,” authorities said. “After not complying with the deputy’s requests, the deputy tased Cure. Cure assaulted the deputy. The deputy used the Taser for a second time and an ASP baton; however, Cure still did not comply. The deputy pulled out his gun and shot Cure. EMT’s treated Cure, but he later died.” Imagine being this guy's family. Having spent 16 years in prison for a crime he did not do, only to be shot and killed by police a few years after being released. My Opinion: The officer had few other options. He was being attacked and tried to defend himself with non-lethal means first. His firearm was his likely last hope.

Brian Krassenstein

3,045,372 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BREAKING: Trump’s would-be assassin has walked into the courtroom laughing while being “shackled by his hands and feet.” Routh has been charged with “possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.” The judge says Routh could face up to “20 years in prison and half a million dollars in fines.” Fox News reports that additional federal charges are possible, but the charges presented today “will keep him in jail.” During the hearing, Routh told the judge he “only makes about $3,000 a month” and has no assets other than “two trucks in Hawaii.” The sheriff stated that when Routh was arrested, “his demeanor was perplexing.” Officers had stopped his vehicle at gunpoint and ordered him out, and despite the seriousness of the situation, his “demeanor was perplexing in some way,” even though there were “numerous people out with rifles, uniformed personnel, a helicopter.” Court documents revealed that Routh was driving a car with stolen plates at the time of his arrest. After fleeing the scene, “officers were able to pull him over and arrest him on I-95.” Additionally, it was noted that “Routh’s mobile phone was detected in the area” from 2:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. the day before his arrest. Routh is currently being held in the Palm Beach County Jail and is expected to appear in court for his next hearing on Monday, September 23.

BREAKING: Trump’s would-be assassin has walked into the courtroom laughing while being “shackled by his hands and feet.” Routh has been charged with “possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.” The judge says Routh could face up to “20 years in prison and half a million dollars in fines.” Fox News reports that additional federal charges are possible, but the charges presented today “will keep him in jail.” During the hearing, Routh told the judge he “only makes about $3,000 a month” and has no assets other than “two trucks in Hawaii.” The sheriff stated that when Routh was arrested, “his demeanor was perplexing.” Officers had stopped his vehicle at gunpoint and ordered him out, and despite the seriousness of the situation, his “demeanor was perplexing in some way,” even though there were “numerous people out with rifles, uniformed personnel, a helicopter.” Court documents revealed that Routh was driving a car with stolen plates at the time of his arrest. After fleeing the scene, “officers were able to pull him over and arrest him on I-95.” Additionally, it was noted that “Routh’s mobile phone was detected in the area” from 2:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. the day before his arrest. Routh is currently being held in the Palm Beach County Jail and is expected to appear in court for his next hearing on Monday, September 23.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,154,647 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Deputy ambushed immediately upon exiting his cruiser. On May 13, 2026, Marion County Sheriff’s Deputy Robert Fitch responded to a suspicious person call in a wooded area in Dunnellon, Florida. The bodycam footage shows the moment he exits his vehicle and is immediately ambushed by 38-year-old Heriberto Medina Marquez. Marquez didn't just resist; he lunged at the deputy, knocked him to the ground, and began repeatedly trying to injure the deputy with a kn!F3. In a miraculous turn of events, Deputy Fitch’s ballistic vest absorbed the force of the attack. As backup arrived, Fitch can be heard saying, "He was steady hitting my chest, but my vest got it." After the struggle, Marquez fled into the woods, leading to a brief pursuit before he was apprehended. While in the back of the patrol car, the suspect's chilling lack of remorse was on full display, as he reportedly told deputies, "I should have k!lled you, you know that, right?" Deputy Fitch has thankfully been treated and released with minor injuries. Marquez is currently being held without bond at the Marion County Jail, facing charges of attempted m*rd*r of a law enforcement officer, resisting arrest, and providing a false name.

Deputy ambushed immediately upon exiting his cruiser. On May 13, 2026, Marion County Sheriff’s Deputy Robert Fitch responded to a suspicious person call in a wooded area in Dunnellon, Florida. The bodycam footage shows the moment he exits his vehicle and is immediately ambushed by 38-year-old Heriberto Medina Marquez. Marquez didn't just resist; he lunged at the deputy, knocked him to the ground, and began repeatedly trying to injure the deputy with a kn!F3. In a miraculous turn of events, Deputy Fitch’s ballistic vest absorbed the force of the attack. As backup arrived, Fitch can be heard saying, "He was steady hitting my chest, but my vest got it." After the struggle, Marquez fled into the woods, leading to a brief pursuit before he was apprehended. While in the back of the patrol car, the suspect's chilling lack of remorse was on full display, as he reportedly told deputies, "I should have k!lled you, you know that, right?" Deputy Fitch has thankfully been treated and released with minor injuries. Marquez is currently being held without bond at the Marion County Jail, facing charges of attempted mrdr of a law enforcement officer, resisting arrest, and providing a false name.

Giggling Ganon

122,824 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Off duty officer pins a man down and detains him over a 5 dollar Walmart pizza. You can't make up this level of incompetence. A routine trip to a Walmart in Kansas City, Kansas, turned into a illegal detainment for 24-year-old Dayton Borisouth over a $5 frozen pizza he had completely paid for. Borisouth was walking toward the exit with his unbagged frozen pizza when an off-duty Kansas City officer working store security stopped him to demand a receipt. Borisouth verbally confirmed he had it but kept walking. Within moments, the situation escalated from there as the officer immediately went hands on and Borisouth was taken to the ground near the entrance. Borisouth repeatedly yelled that he had the receipt in his pocket, pleading with officers to just look at it. Instead, the officer continued to pin him down. As back up arrived one of the officers placing a knee directly on his neck and threatened to bre@k his nose if he didn't comply. Borisouth had the receipt the entire time. Shoplifting charges were never filed, and the department quickly dropped initial citations for non-compliance and interference. Following an internal review, the Kansas City, Kansas Police Department publicly admitted that the off-duty officer should have disengaged the moment Borisouth walked away. The department confirmed that a responding officer used an unapproved, untrained knee-on-neck restraint. Two officers faced disciplinary action and were forced to undergo mandatory retraining. Despite the trauma and public backlash, Borisouth and his family chose not to pursue civil rights or personal injury lawsuits. After being detained in a police cruiser for nearly an hour, Borisouth was released. Because his pizza had completely thawed and spoiled during the scuffle, he walked right back into the Walmart, showed his receipt to a greeter, and the store gave him a replacement pizza before he finally went home.

Off duty officer pins a man down and detains him over a 5 dollar Walmart pizza. You can't make up this level of incompetence. A routine trip to a Walmart in Kansas City, Kansas, turned into a illegal detainment for 24-year-old Dayton Borisouth over a $5 frozen pizza he had completely paid for. Borisouth was walking toward the exit with his unbagged frozen pizza when an off-duty Kansas City officer working store security stopped him to demand a receipt. Borisouth verbally confirmed he had it but kept walking. Within moments, the situation escalated from there as the officer immediately went hands on and Borisouth was taken to the ground near the entrance. Borisouth repeatedly yelled that he had the receipt in his pocket, pleading with officers to just look at it. Instead, the officer continued to pin him down. As back up arrived one of the officers placing a knee directly on his neck and threatened to bre@k his nose if he didn't comply. Borisouth had the receipt the entire time. Shoplifting charges were never filed, and the department quickly dropped initial citations for non-compliance and interference. Following an internal review, the Kansas City, Kansas Police Department publicly admitted that the off-duty officer should have disengaged the moment Borisouth walked away. The department confirmed that a responding officer used an unapproved, untrained knee-on-neck restraint. Two officers faced disciplinary action and were forced to undergo mandatory retraining. Despite the trauma and public backlash, Borisouth and his family chose not to pursue civil rights or personal injury lawsuits. After being detained in a police cruiser for nearly an hour, Borisouth was released. Because his pizza had completely thawed and spoiled during the scuffle, he walked right back into the Walmart, showed his receipt to a greeter, and the store gave him a replacement pizza before he finally went home.

Giggling Ganon

82,987 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Florida man sh**ts at a Walmart delivery drone with a pistol and then jokes with police officers that he "can't breathe" when they put handcuffs on him. Absolute legend. 72-year-old Dennis Winn shot at a Walmart drone with his 9mm after it flew over his property. Winn said he had issues in his neighborhood with people flying drones over his house. The Lake County Sheriff's Office says they found a bullet hole in the payload the drone was carrying. He was charged with sh**ting at an aircraft, criminal mischief damage over $1,000, and discharging a firearm in public.

Florida man shts at a Walmart delivery drone with a pistol and then jokes with police officers that he "can't breathe" when they put handcuffs on him. Absolute legend. 72-year-old Dennis Winn shot at a Walmart drone with his 9mm after it flew over his property. Winn said he had issues in his neighborhood with people flying drones over his house. The Lake County Sheriff's Office says they found a bullet hole in the payload the drone was carrying. He was charged with shting at an aircraft, criminal mischief damage over $1,000, and discharging a firearm in public.

Collin Rugg

8,731,811 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tyrant cop has zero understanding of the law and has no desire learn. Ultimately had to do the walk of shame. A routine First Amendment audit outside a United States Post Office in Fremont, Ohio, quickly escalated into a tense constitutional showdown, a forceful arrest, and a major federal civil rights lawsuit. It began when two independent videographers were standing on a public sidewalk, filming the exterior of the post office building. After a call was placed to dispatch reporting "suspicious activity," Fremont Police Department officers arrived on the scene and immediately demanded identification. What followed was a sharp legal disagreement over Ohio law and citizen rights: The Police Stance: Sergeant Kiddey claimed that the citizen call gave him the authority to demand ID, warning the videographers that refusing to comply constituted "obstruction of official business." The Citizen Stance: The videographers stood their ground, asserting their First Amendment right to film in public and correctly noting that Ohio is not a "stop and identify" state unless law enforcement possesses Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur. When the videographers refused to hand over their identification, officers moved in to make an arrest. During the struggle, one of the men—a military veteran—repeatedly cried out in pain, alerting officers to a pre-existing combat-related shoulder injury and VA disability. Despite his warnings, he and his fellow videographer were forcefully handcuffed and detained. The situation took a dramatic turn when a police supervisor, Captain Conger, arrived on the scene. After evaluating the facts, the supervisor recognized that the initial detention and demands for ID lacked proper legal grounds. The handcuffs were removed, and the men were immediately released. While the videographers walked away free that day, the incident didn't end on the sidewalk. This case has officially moved into the federal court system, bringing accountability into the spotlight. The Federal Lawsuit: In March 2025, a formal civil rights lawsuit—Kelley v. Fremont Police Department, et al. (Case No. 3:25-cv-00508)—was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Defendants: The suit seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, specifically naming Sgt. Jason P. Kiddey, Officer Lucas A. Villarreal, Captain Ty J. Conger, and Detective Matthew J. Ranazzi for unlawful arrest and First Amendment retaliation. Current Status: After the city's legal counsel filed a formal denial of liability, the case entered the litigation track. The court has issued a strict case management schedule, setting the final deadline for fact discovery for June 15, 2026. Both sides are currently undergoing depositions and exchanging internal records, moving this case one step closer to a final resolution in front of a federal judge. We will keep an eye on this one and revisit in the future. Know your rights folks and don't count on the officers in front of you to know them for you or respect those rights.

Tyrant cop has zero understanding of the law and has no desire learn. Ultimately had to do the walk of shame. A routine First Amendment audit outside a United States Post Office in Fremont, Ohio, quickly escalated into a tense constitutional showdown, a forceful arrest, and a major federal civil rights lawsuit. It began when two independent videographers were standing on a public sidewalk, filming the exterior of the post office building. After a call was placed to dispatch reporting "suspicious activity," Fremont Police Department officers arrived on the scene and immediately demanded identification. What followed was a sharp legal disagreement over Ohio law and citizen rights: The Police Stance: Sergeant Kiddey claimed that the citizen call gave him the authority to demand ID, warning the videographers that refusing to comply constituted "obstruction of official business." The Citizen Stance: The videographers stood their ground, asserting their First Amendment right to film in public and correctly noting that Ohio is not a "stop and identify" state unless law enforcement possesses Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur. When the videographers refused to hand over their identification, officers moved in to make an arrest. During the struggle, one of the men—a military veteran—repeatedly cried out in pain, alerting officers to a pre-existing combat-related shoulder injury and VA disability. Despite his warnings, he and his fellow videographer were forcefully handcuffed and detained. The situation took a dramatic turn when a police supervisor, Captain Conger, arrived on the scene. After evaluating the facts, the supervisor recognized that the initial detention and demands for ID lacked proper legal grounds. The handcuffs were removed, and the men were immediately released. While the videographers walked away free that day, the incident didn't end on the sidewalk. This case has officially moved into the federal court system, bringing accountability into the spotlight. The Federal Lawsuit: In March 2025, a formal civil rights lawsuit—Kelley v. Fremont Police Department, et al. (Case No. 3:25-cv-00508)—was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Defendants: The suit seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, specifically naming Sgt. Jason P. Kiddey, Officer Lucas A. Villarreal, Captain Ty J. Conger, and Detective Matthew J. Ranazzi for unlawful arrest and First Amendment retaliation. Current Status: After the city's legal counsel filed a formal denial of liability, the case entered the litigation track. The court has issued a strict case management schedule, setting the final deadline for fact discovery for June 15, 2026. Both sides are currently undergoing depositions and exchanging internal records, moving this case one step closer to a final resolution in front of a federal judge. We will keep an eye on this one and revisit in the future. Know your rights folks and don't count on the officers in front of you to know them for you or respect those rights.

Giggling Ganon

66,892 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Wolff: Now Epstein’s explanation for why this friendship ended is as follows. In 2004, Epstein believed himself to be the high bidder on a piece of real estate in Palm Beach—a house. His bid was $36 million. He took his friend Trump around to see the house, to advise him on how to move the swimming pool. Trump thereupon went around Epstein’s back and bid $40 million for the house—and got the property. Epstein, who was well acquainted and in fact deeply involved with Trump’s scattered finances, understood that he didn’t have $40 million to pay for this house. Now, if that was the case, it was someone else’s $40 million. At the time, Epstein believed this to be the $40 million of a Russian oligarch by the name of Rybolovlev. Less than two years later, this same house that Trump had bought for $40 million was sold for $95 million—and it was in fact sold to Mr. Rybolovlev. This is all a red flag of money laundering. And what Epstein did—and he was furious about losing this house—I mean, there’s something about these guys, these men, that nothing rouses them so much as a real estate betrayal. Epstein, after this—the sale of this house, after Trump went around his back, got this house—Epstein began to threaten with lawsuits, with going to the press and saying that Trump was a frontman for a money laundering deal. Trump panics at this point, and Epstein believed—that it was Trump who went to the police and, as Epstein said, dropped the dime on him. That is to say, informed the police of what was going on. And an investigation began, and all of Epstein’s legal problems for the next 15 years began to unfold. This story about this piece of real estate and their falling out was first published in June 2019. It’s published actually in my book Siege, the second book I had written about the Trump White House. Epstein had recounted this story to me. I put it in this book. Epstein, at that moment, was in Paris. He read the book. He called me with some alarm, and he said he was afraid that he might have said too much. Three weeks later, he returned to the United States from Paris and was promptly arrested on the tarmac of Teterboro Airport in New Jersey when his plane landed.

Wolff: Now Epstein’s explanation for why this friendship ended is as follows. In 2004, Epstein believed himself to be the high bidder on a piece of real estate in Palm Beach—a house. His bid was $36 million. He took his friend Trump around to see the house, to advise him on how to move the swimming pool. Trump thereupon went around Epstein’s back and bid $40 million for the house—and got the property. Epstein, who was well acquainted and in fact deeply involved with Trump’s scattered finances, understood that he didn’t have $40 million to pay for this house. Now, if that was the case, it was someone else’s $40 million. At the time, Epstein believed this to be the $40 million of a Russian oligarch by the name of Rybolovlev. Less than two years later, this same house that Trump had bought for $40 million was sold for $95 million—and it was in fact sold to Mr. Rybolovlev. This is all a red flag of money laundering. And what Epstein did—and he was furious about losing this house—I mean, there’s something about these guys, these men, that nothing rouses them so much as a real estate betrayal. Epstein, after this—the sale of this house, after Trump went around his back, got this house—Epstein began to threaten with lawsuits, with going to the press and saying that Trump was a frontman for a money laundering deal. Trump panics at this point, and Epstein believed—that it was Trump who went to the police and, as Epstein said, dropped the dime on him. That is to say, informed the police of what was going on. And an investigation began, and all of Epstein’s legal problems for the next 15 years began to unfold. This story about this piece of real estate and their falling out was first published in June 2019. It’s published actually in my book Siege, the second book I had written about the Trump White House. Epstein had recounted this story to me. I put it in this book. Epstein, at that moment, was in Paris. He read the book. He called me with some alarm, and he said he was afraid that he might have said too much. Three weeks later, he returned to the United States from Paris and was promptly arrested on the tarmac of Teterboro Airport in New Jersey when his plane landed.

Acyn

1,617,450 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Ganon

106,967 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen