Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a... legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.show more

Giggling Ganon

266,680 subscribers

53,241 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Giggling Ganon

30,366 views • 5 months ago

🚨Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Ricardez spotted a man filming behind a store while on patrol, approached him on the property, demanded ID and an explanation for why he was there recording, and went hands-on. An employee then opened the back door, told the deputy the man was allowed to be there, and brought him inside. Deputy Ricardez said he was just trying to protect the business. ❓Who is to blame for how this went down? The man who didn't cooperate with the deputy or the deputy for going onto private property and demanding answers. ❓Is the deputy being proactive by checking on him or is he just looking for someone to eff with? ❓Can a police officer go onto private property uninvited, and detain someone for loitering, because he saw them recording?

🚨Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Ricardez spotted a man filming behind a store while on patrol, approached him on the property, demanded ID and an explanation for why he was there recording, and went hands-on. An employee then opened the back door, told the deputy the man was allowed to be there, and brought him inside. Deputy Ricardez said he was just trying to protect the business. ❓Who is to blame for how this went down? The man who didn't cooperate with the deputy or the deputy for going onto private property and demanding answers. ❓Is the deputy being proactive by checking on him or is he just looking for someone to eff with? ❓Can a police officer go onto private property uninvited, and detain someone for loitering, because he saw them recording?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

54,017 views • 5 days ago

Deputy enters property through a locked gate and no warrant. Gets schooled on tresspass laws and booted off the property. When law enforcement mistakes an In Kalispell, Montana, a Flathead County Sheriff’s deputy identifying himself only as "Deputy Mark", bypassed a chained, closed gate onto private property under the premise of investigating an abandoned Ford Expedition parked down near a local school. The deputy claimed he was conducting a welfare check to locate an individual named Eli Tully. The immediate issue? Had the deputy conducted basic due diligence before stepping foot past a locked perimeter, he would have known Tully had already been arrested two weeks prior and was actively sitting inside the Flathead County Detention Center on assault charges. When property owner Jacob Norris stepped out to address the intrusion, he immediately answered the deputy's primary question by confirming Tully was already in the county jail. He also questioned the deputy on how he got in thus getting the deputy to admit that the gate was locked with a chain. Norris then did what every citizen has the constitutional right to do: he exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and repeatedly ordered the deputy to vacate his private property. Under the Fourth Amendment and Montana trespass law, any implied license for an officer to conduct a warrantless knock-and-talk vanishes the moment the property owner revokes consent. Instead of walking back to his cruiser, the deputy’s ego took over. Viewing the invocation of basic rights as defiance rather than the law of the land, he refused to leave, walked over to question a neighbor on the property, and brazenly stated: "I'll leave when I'm done." That statement encapsulates an alarming mentality where an officer believes personal convenience and authority supersede the private property rights of the public. To make matters worse, after escalating the encounter and demonstrating clear contempt for a citizen standing on firm legal ground, the deputy refused to provide his full name or badge number before driving off. There are no records I can find if Jacob filed a formal complaint or lawsuit against the sheriff department based on the incident. Know your rights, remain calm, and never let an official convince you that following the Constitution is optional.

Deputy enters property through a locked gate and no warrant. Gets schooled on tresspass laws and booted off the property. When law enforcement mistakes an In Kalispell, Montana, a Flathead County Sheriff’s deputy identifying himself only as "Deputy Mark", bypassed a chained, closed gate onto private property under the premise of investigating an abandoned Ford Expedition parked down near a local school. The deputy claimed he was conducting a welfare check to locate an individual named Eli Tully. The immediate issue? Had the deputy conducted basic due diligence before stepping foot past a locked perimeter, he would have known Tully had already been arrested two weeks prior and was actively sitting inside the Flathead County Detention Center on assault charges. When property owner Jacob Norris stepped out to address the intrusion, he immediately answered the deputy's primary question by confirming Tully was already in the county jail. He also questioned the deputy on how he got in thus getting the deputy to admit that the gate was locked with a chain. Norris then did what every citizen has the constitutional right to do: he exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and repeatedly ordered the deputy to vacate his private property. Under the Fourth Amendment and Montana trespass law, any implied license for an officer to conduct a warrantless knock-and-talk vanishes the moment the property owner revokes consent. Instead of walking back to his cruiser, the deputy’s ego took over. Viewing the invocation of basic rights as defiance rather than the law of the land, he refused to leave, walked over to question a neighbor on the property, and brazenly stated: "I'll leave when I'm done." That statement encapsulates an alarming mentality where an officer believes personal convenience and authority supersede the private property rights of the public. To make matters worse, after escalating the encounter and demonstrating clear contempt for a citizen standing on firm legal ground, the deputy refused to provide his full name or badge number before driving off. There are no records I can find if Jacob filed a formal complaint or lawsuit against the sheriff department based on the incident. Know your rights, remain calm, and never let an official convince you that following the Constitution is optional.

Giggling Gannon

1,389,206 views • 1 month ago

🚔Watch a deputy refuse to leave a property after he no longer has a legal reason to be there. Making a point. Three Florida sheriff's deputies showed up at a residence looking for someone who used to live there. One deputy walked the curtilage of the property while the homeowner spoke with the other two. The homeowner told them the person they wanted was already in their custody at the Osceola County Jail. The deputy still continued moving about the property then defiantly stood facing the homeowner without moving as he repeatedly asked, then demanded that the deputy remove himself from the property. The homeowner demanded a sergeant respond so he could file a complaint. Instead, a deputy handed him a card with a number and told him to call and ask for a supervisor. That’s how it was handled. ❓When does “looking for someone who used to live here” become a search of your front and back yards? ❓What training says keep walking the property after the reason for being there is gone? ❓Why did one deputy stand flatfooted and defiant while the owner kept telling him to get off his property?

🚔Watch a deputy refuse to leave a property after he no longer has a legal reason to be there. Making a point. Three Florida sheriff's deputies showed up at a residence looking for someone who used to live there. One deputy walked the curtilage of the property while the homeowner spoke with the other two. The homeowner told them the person they wanted was already in their custody at the Osceola County Jail. The deputy still continued moving about the property then defiantly stood facing the homeowner without moving as he repeatedly asked, then demanded that the deputy remove himself from the property. The homeowner demanded a sergeant respond so he could file a complaint. Instead, a deputy handed him a card with a number and told him to call and ask for a supervisor. That’s how it was handled. ❓When does “looking for someone who used to live here” become a search of your front and back yards? ❓What training says keep walking the property after the reason for being there is gone? ❓Why did one deputy stand flatfooted and defiant while the owner kept telling him to get off his property?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

46,584 views • 7 days ago

This tyrant shows why bodycams are so vital. When a routine traffic stop turns into a complete breakdown of constitutional rights, the sworn deposition under oath reveals everything. The arrogance of this deputy will blow your mind. Citizen journalist Jeff Gray observed and video-recorded a routine traffic stop conducted by Deputy Cook from roughly 35 feet away. Rather than completing the stop, the deputy claimed recording made him "nervous" and called for backup. Upon arriving, Deputy Brian Stoll attempted to control the scene by instructing Gray to stand near a commercial building—only to then approach the property manager to solicit a trespass order against him. When ordered off the private property, Gray immediately complied and walked onto the public right-of-way. Despite Gray standing fully on public property, Deputy Stoll arrested him, damaged his phone, and threatened to hold him as a "John Doe" in jail for 48 hours for not surrendering identification. Fast forward to the civil suit deposition, Deputy Stoll's testimony unraveled on the record: • He claimed under oath that officers possess virtually unlimited authority to issue demands, and refusing to comply automatically constitutes criminal obstruction. This is what this bully believes. • He admitted Gray did nothing disruptive beyond holding a camera from 35 feet away, yet maintained that making an officer nervous by filming equals obstruction. • He conceded on the record that Gray had already retreated to the public right-of-way before being handcuffed. Translation his ego was hurt so he wanted to punish Gray for it by arresting him and hoping he will resist. The criminal charges against Gray were promptly dismissed, the deputy faced internal reprimands, and Brevard County ultimately settled the federal § 1983 civil rights lawsuit out of court after the damaging deposition stripped away any viable defense. The real crime here is that this person that is not fit to wear a badge got to keep his job and the tax payers had to bail him out with an undisclosed size cash settlement.

This tyrant shows why bodycams are so vital. When a routine traffic stop turns into a complete breakdown of constitutional rights, the sworn deposition under oath reveals everything. The arrogance of this deputy will blow your mind. Citizen journalist Jeff Gray observed and video-recorded a routine traffic stop conducted by Deputy Cook from roughly 35 feet away. Rather than completing the stop, the deputy claimed recording made him "nervous" and called for backup. Upon arriving, Deputy Brian Stoll attempted to control the scene by instructing Gray to stand near a commercial building—only to then approach the property manager to solicit a trespass order against him. When ordered off the private property, Gray immediately complied and walked onto the public right-of-way. Despite Gray standing fully on public property, Deputy Stoll arrested him, damaged his phone, and threatened to hold him as a "John Doe" in jail for 48 hours for not surrendering identification. Fast forward to the civil suit deposition, Deputy Stoll's testimony unraveled on the record: • He claimed under oath that officers possess virtually unlimited authority to issue demands, and refusing to comply automatically constitutes criminal obstruction. This is what this bully believes. • He admitted Gray did nothing disruptive beyond holding a camera from 35 feet away, yet maintained that making an officer nervous by filming equals obstruction. • He conceded on the record that Gray had already retreated to the public right-of-way before being handcuffed. Translation his ego was hurt so he wanted to punish Gray for it by arresting him and hoping he will resist. The criminal charges against Gray were promptly dismissed, the deputy faced internal reprimands, and Brevard County ultimately settled the federal § 1983 civil rights lawsuit out of court after the damaging deposition stripped away any viable defense. The real crime here is that this person that is not fit to wear a badge got to keep his job and the tax payers had to bail him out with an undisclosed size cash settlement.

Giggling Gannon

54,858 views • 1 month ago

How bold this officer is with violating the rights of this man. Illegally searched his weapon in an open carry state. Took his personal property and refused to return it. Refused to get a supervisor out at the scene. Flat out said no. He assaulted the man by aggressively grabbing him. The list goes on and on. This officer should be relieved of duty. Also every other officer that pulled up should be investigated for not shutting down this tyrant. Know your rights folks and do not allow them to infringe on your 2A or any other right.

How bold this officer is with violating the rights of this man. Illegally searched his weapon in an open carry state. Took his personal property and refused to return it. Refused to get a supervisor out at the scene. Flat out said no. He assaulted the man by aggressively grabbing him. The list goes on and on. This officer should be relieved of duty. Also every other officer that pulled up should be investigated for not shutting down this tyrant. Know your rights folks and do not allow them to infringe on your 2A or any other right.

Giggling Ganon

32,893 views • 5 months ago

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Giggling Ganon

81,704 views • 3 months ago

Officer pulls his fire arm on man because the guy won't allow him to violate his rights. This officer felt that he could just reach into this guy's car and take his property without permission. He never told the man what his crime was until he already had his gun drawn. Good on this guy for standing his ground and knowing his rights.

Officer pulls his fire arm on man because the guy won't allow him to violate his rights. This officer felt that he could just reach into this guy's car and take his property without permission. He never told the man what his crime was until he already had his gun drawn. Good on this guy for standing his ground and knowing his rights.

Chuckling Charlie

129,085 views • 5 months ago

Roles reversed on deputies as property owner tresspassed them. Riverside County Deputy Valles (Badge #6128) arrived at the home following reports of potential self-harm and impaired driving looking for a man named Brandon. The resident immediately took control of the interaction. Filming from his driveway, he repeatedly shut down the deputy's questions, demanding her badge number and insisting she leave his private property without a warrant. The deputy refuses to leave and has a call in for back up. Enter Lieutenant Houle (Badge #3681) of the department's Community Care Team arriving to de-escalate. The man refused to back down or play along with their questioning. Pointing out that he was visibly coherent, unharmed, and on his own land, he made it crystal clear that their presence was non-consensual. One last ditch effort made by the deputies to try and gain leverage was asking if the man was impaired. The man again stands his ground telling the deputies what he thinks. Realizing they had l no legal grounds or exigent circumstances to force the issue, Lieutenant Houle canceled incoming medical units ("Medical 10-22"). As soon as the resident turned around and walked back inside his house, both deputies were left doing that walk of shame.

Roles reversed on deputies as property owner tresspassed them. Riverside County Deputy Valles (Badge #6128) arrived at the home following reports of potential self-harm and impaired driving looking for a man named Brandon. The resident immediately took control of the interaction. Filming from his driveway, he repeatedly shut down the deputy's questions, demanding her badge number and insisting she leave his private property without a warrant. The deputy refuses to leave and has a call in for back up. Enter Lieutenant Houle (Badge #3681) of the department's Community Care Team arriving to de-escalate. The man refused to back down or play along with their questioning. Pointing out that he was visibly coherent, unharmed, and on his own land, he made it crystal clear that their presence was non-consensual. One last ditch effort made by the deputies to try and gain leverage was asking if the man was impaired. The man again stands his ground telling the deputies what he thinks. Realizing they had l no legal grounds or exigent circumstances to force the issue, Lieutenant Houle canceled incoming medical units ("Medical 10-22"). As soon as the resident turned around and walked back inside his house, both deputies were left doing that walk of shame.

Giggling Gannon

189,490 views • 1 month ago

Officer holds man at gunpoint that does not fit description of the person he is looking for. Officer Kerzaya was called out to this hotel as a white man pulled a gun on the hotel staff. As the officer was searching the premises he ran into Trey an employee of the hotel and also African American. The officer proceeded to pull his firearm on and hold Trey at gun point for a number of minutes. The whole time Trey had his hands up and was eventually on his knees. Once verified Trey was an employee all he said to him was get out of here. Next this officer pulled his gun on another person in the hotel that also did not fit the description. The officer resigned from duty as his certification was stripped from him. Trey filed suit against the city and pulled in a settlement.

Officer holds man at gunpoint that does not fit description of the person he is looking for. Officer Kerzaya was called out to this hotel as a white man pulled a gun on the hotel staff. As the officer was searching the premises he ran into Trey an employee of the hotel and also African American. The officer proceeded to pull his firearm on and hold Trey at gun point for a number of minutes. The whole time Trey had his hands up and was eventually on his knees. Once verified Trey was an employee all he said to him was get out of here. Next this officer pulled his gun on another person in the hotel that also did not fit the description. The officer resigned from duty as his certification was stripped from him. Trey filed suit against the city and pulled in a settlement.

Chuckling Charlie

45,380 views • 5 months ago

🥵Man on ground being handcuffed: "Why are you being so rough with me?" 👮‍♀️Officer: Because you refuse to listen and turned away from me." In 2018 in Wasilla, Alaska, a man stood on the public sidewalk outside the Office of Children’s Services holding a sign and protesting what he called the agency “kidnapping kids.” He had already been asked to leave the office inside. Staff wanted him trespassed, but they never got authorization from the property manager. A Wasilla officer approached him on the sidewalk, immediately grabbed his arm, ordered him to put his hands behind his back, then took him to the ground hard and arrested him. The officer treated it as trespassing even though the man was on public property and was not resisting. Subsequently the officers realized he was not on trespass notice and even if he had been he remained on the sidewalk. No news story identifies the protester or the officer. There is no reported lawsuit against the city or the officer. There is no reported internal investigation ❓What do you think about the officer saying his "training and 11 years of experience" taught him that someone turning toward him justifies a hard and fast take down? ❓Was that a justifiable officer-safety-takedown or was that a dick move against a man not resisting? ❓What crime did the officer believe he was stopping the man on the sidewalk from committing?

🥵Man on ground being handcuffed: "Why are you being so rough with me?" 👮‍♀️Officer: Because you refuse to listen and turned away from me." In 2018 in Wasilla, Alaska, a man stood on the public sidewalk outside the Office of Children’s Services holding a sign and protesting what he called the agency “kidnapping kids.” He had already been asked to leave the office inside. Staff wanted him trespassed, but they never got authorization from the property manager. A Wasilla officer approached him on the sidewalk, immediately grabbed his arm, ordered him to put his hands behind his back, then took him to the ground hard and arrested him. The officer treated it as trespassing even though the man was on public property and was not resisting. Subsequently the officers realized he was not on trespass notice and even if he had been he remained on the sidewalk. No news story identifies the protester or the officer. There is no reported lawsuit against the city or the officer. There is no reported internal investigation ❓What do you think about the officer saying his "training and 11 years of experience" taught him that someone turning toward him justifies a hard and fast take down? ❓Was that a justifiable officer-safety-takedown or was that a dick move against a man not resisting? ❓What crime did the officer believe he was stopping the man on the sidewalk from committing?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

53,686 views • 5 days ago

Drunk male karen tried to square up on officer twice his size over an Uber dispute. It comically does not end well for him. Deputies in Charlotte County, Florida, received an urgent call from an Uber driver. She reported that her passenger, 52-year-old Eric Martel, had become incredibly aggressive and confrontational after she picked him up from a local bar. Fearing for her safety, the driver didn't hesitate—she immediately dropped Martel off in a nearby business parking lot and called 911. When deputies arrived minutes later, Martel initially allowed a pat-down for weapons, but the cooperation stopped there. Over the course of the interaction, his demeanor completely shifted into outright hostility. When property management requested that Martel be formally trespassed from the property, he flatly refused to leave. He repeatedly shouted obscenities, squared up with a sergeant, and accused the deputies of disrespecting him. The situation crossed the line when Martel looked directly at a deputy that was twice his size and told him he will need three of him to stop him. The deputy answered I doubt that. After multiple warnings to walk away and stop causing a public disturbance, deputies attempted to place Martel under arrest. Martel physically resisted, leading a deputy to deploy a Taser to safely bring him to the ground and secure him in handcuffs. If Martel had simply walked away when told to leave, he would have remained a free man. Instead, he was booked into the Charlotte County Jail on a heavy list of charges: Disorderly Intoxication Trespass After Warning Resisting an Officer Without Violence Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) You just knew as this built up that this guy was playing stupid games and it would only be a matter of time before he won his prize.

Drunk male karen tried to square up on officer twice his size over an Uber dispute. It comically does not end well for him. Deputies in Charlotte County, Florida, received an urgent call from an Uber driver. She reported that her passenger, 52-year-old Eric Martel, had become incredibly aggressive and confrontational after she picked him up from a local bar. Fearing for her safety, the driver didn't hesitate—she immediately dropped Martel off in a nearby business parking lot and called 911. When deputies arrived minutes later, Martel initially allowed a pat-down for weapons, but the cooperation stopped there. Over the course of the interaction, his demeanor completely shifted into outright hostility. When property management requested that Martel be formally trespassed from the property, he flatly refused to leave. He repeatedly shouted obscenities, squared up with a sergeant, and accused the deputies of disrespecting him. The situation crossed the line when Martel looked directly at a deputy that was twice his size and told him he will need three of him to stop him. The deputy answered I doubt that. After multiple warnings to walk away and stop causing a public disturbance, deputies attempted to place Martel under arrest. Martel physically resisted, leading a deputy to deploy a Taser to safely bring him to the ground and secure him in handcuffs. If Martel had simply walked away when told to leave, he would have remained a free man. Instead, he was booked into the Charlotte County Jail on a heavy list of charges: Disorderly Intoxication Trespass After Warning Resisting an Officer Without Violence Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) You just knew as this built up that this guy was playing stupid games and it would only be a matter of time before he won his prize.

Giggling Ganon

196,817 views • 3 months ago

Tyrant officer pulls his firearm and loses his cool when a property owner kicks him off the property. Dr. P.J. Parmar of Aurora Co, drove into his own property’s garage on a Sunday evening to unload equipment following a Boy Scout outing he led. What he didn't expect was to be met with a drawn firearm. Inside the garage sat Aurora Police Officer Justin Henderson, parked while writing a report. When Dr. Parmar tapped his horn to ask the officer to clear the path, Officer Henderson claimed he was startled and feared a potential ambush. He exited his patrol vehicle with his gun drawn demanding that Dr. Parmar show his hands. Rather than backing down, Dr. Parmar remained calm and stood his ground. He clearly stated that he was on his own private property, repeatedly instructed the officer to leave, and began recording the interaction. Although Officer Henderson eventually holstered his weapon, he refused to leave the property, demanded proof of ownership from Dr. Parmar, and called for backup. Undeterred, Dr. Parmar simply ignored the threats from the officer and went about his business carrying gear inside. Officers eventually left the scene without issuing any citations. Following the release of the bodycam, the Aurora Police Department conducted an internal investigation. Officer Henderson received a 40-hour unpaid suspension and was ordered to complete de-escalation training. Dr. Parmar publicly criticized the sanction as far too lenient. Dr. Parmar subsequently filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Officer Henderson and the City of Aurora, alleging illegal seizure, excessive force, and racially motivated mistreatment. U.S. District Court Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissed the lawsuit. The court reasoned that because Dr. Parmar never submitted to police authority and continued moving freely around his property, no legal "seizure" or unconstitutional force had occurred. However, the judge notably expressed deep concern over court testimony highlighting a pervasive "warrior mentality" in police training practices. What are your thoughts on this lawsuit or situation? Special treatment again for the cops?

Tyrant officer pulls his firearm and loses his cool when a property owner kicks him off the property. Dr. P.J. Parmar of Aurora Co, drove into his own property’s garage on a Sunday evening to unload equipment following a Boy Scout outing he led. What he didn't expect was to be met with a drawn firearm. Inside the garage sat Aurora Police Officer Justin Henderson, parked while writing a report. When Dr. Parmar tapped his horn to ask the officer to clear the path, Officer Henderson claimed he was startled and feared a potential ambush. He exited his patrol vehicle with his gun drawn demanding that Dr. Parmar show his hands. Rather than backing down, Dr. Parmar remained calm and stood his ground. He clearly stated that he was on his own private property, repeatedly instructed the officer to leave, and began recording the interaction. Although Officer Henderson eventually holstered his weapon, he refused to leave the property, demanded proof of ownership from Dr. Parmar, and called for backup. Undeterred, Dr. Parmar simply ignored the threats from the officer and went about his business carrying gear inside. Officers eventually left the scene without issuing any citations. Following the release of the bodycam, the Aurora Police Department conducted an internal investigation. Officer Henderson received a 40-hour unpaid suspension and was ordered to complete de-escalation training. Dr. Parmar publicly criticized the sanction as far too lenient. Dr. Parmar subsequently filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Officer Henderson and the City of Aurora, alleging illegal seizure, excessive force, and racially motivated mistreatment. U.S. District Court Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissed the lawsuit. The court reasoned that because Dr. Parmar never submitted to police authority and continued moving freely around his property, no legal "seizure" or unconstitutional force had occurred. However, the judge notably expressed deep concern over court testimony highlighting a pervasive "warrior mentality" in police training practices. What are your thoughts on this lawsuit or situation? Special treatment again for the cops?

Giggling Gannon

195,877 views • 2 months ago

Officer Karen goes tyrant mode demanding ID like it's Crack from some workers. A group of contract field workers were simply doing their jobs, moving between scheduled appointments at a local property complex, when a female police officer decided to intervene. Her reasoning? She claimed the group looked "suspicious" going in and out of the buildings, and pointed out that one worker wasn't visibly wearing an employee ID badge around her neck. Instead of backing down under the threat of arrest, the man (Jeffrey) stood his ground. He repeatedly offered alternative solutions, including showing digital employee credentials on his phone and providing his supervisor's direct contact number. When the officer refused those alternatives and continued to demand his physical ID under threat of taking him to jail, Jeffrey laid down the legal facts: Unless an officer has Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) that an individual has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, you are not legally required to identify yourself or hand over physical ID simply because an officer asks. Walking between work appointments without a lanyard badge isn't a crime, and vague claims of "looking suspicious" don't meet the legal threshold for forced identification under Fourth Amendment precedent. Despite the officer shutting down conversation and insisting he was in the wrong, Jeffrey held firm and requested a police supervisor. Once the supervisor arrived on scene and evaluated the situation, the narrative completely flipped. The supervisor confirmed that no crime had been committed and acknowledged that Jeffrey was entirely within his rights to withhold his identification. The incident ended with zero citations, zero arrests, and a textbook lesson in constitutional rights. Know the law in your state—it makes all the difference when authority gets unchecked.

Officer Karen goes tyrant mode demanding ID like it's Crack from some workers. A group of contract field workers were simply doing their jobs, moving between scheduled appointments at a local property complex, when a female police officer decided to intervene. Her reasoning? She claimed the group looked "suspicious" going in and out of the buildings, and pointed out that one worker wasn't visibly wearing an employee ID badge around her neck. Instead of backing down under the threat of arrest, the man (Jeffrey) stood his ground. He repeatedly offered alternative solutions, including showing digital employee credentials on his phone and providing his supervisor's direct contact number. When the officer refused those alternatives and continued to demand his physical ID under threat of taking him to jail, Jeffrey laid down the legal facts: Unless an officer has Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) that an individual has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, you are not legally required to identify yourself or hand over physical ID simply because an officer asks. Walking between work appointments without a lanyard badge isn't a crime, and vague claims of "looking suspicious" don't meet the legal threshold for forced identification under Fourth Amendment precedent. Despite the officer shutting down conversation and insisting he was in the wrong, Jeffrey held firm and requested a police supervisor. Once the supervisor arrived on scene and evaluated the situation, the narrative completely flipped. The supervisor confirmed that no crime had been committed and acknowledged that Jeffrey was entirely within his rights to withhold his identification. The incident ended with zero citations, zero arrests, and a textbook lesson in constitutional rights. Know the law in your state—it makes all the difference when authority gets unchecked.

Giggling Ganon

37,347 views • 1 month ago

Kern County bodycam out of Rosamond, California. Aug. 3. Desert Oasis Mobile Estates on 15th Street West. A deputy rolls on a peace disturbance and finds the 911 caller behind a wire fence. The guy called because a neighbor keeps revving an engine outside his house at night. On the phone he already told dispatch he was going to “f*** them up.” On scene he gets more wound up. He wants to punch the driver. He wants a restraining order the deputy cannot hand him on the sidewalk. Then he walks back inside and says he is going to get his sword and “take care of it.” He says he is going to kill the guy. He comes back out with the blade up. “Go ahead and shoot me.” Climbs the fence. Runs at the deputy with the sword raised. Even tries the cruiser door. Deputy backs up, orders him to drop it. Man keeps coming, yelling “Kill me!” Deputy fires. Man goes down, finally dumps the sword, and deputies start aid. Suspect identified as Joshua Dribin, 22. Charges include assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer, resisting with force, exhibiting a deadly weapon at an officer to resist, and obstructing. KCSO later said the shoot was within policy.

Kern County bodycam out of Rosamond, California. Aug. 3. Desert Oasis Mobile Estates on 15th Street West. A deputy rolls on a peace disturbance and finds the 911 caller behind a wire fence. The guy called because a neighbor keeps revving an engine outside his house at night. On the phone he already told dispatch he was going to “f*** them up.” On scene he gets more wound up. He wants to punch the driver. He wants a restraining order the deputy cannot hand him on the sidewalk. Then he walks back inside and says he is going to get his sword and “take care of it.” He says he is going to kill the guy. He comes back out with the blade up. “Go ahead and shoot me.” Climbs the fence. Runs at the deputy with the sword raised. Even tries the cruiser door. Deputy backs up, orders him to drop it. Man keeps coming, yelling “Kill me!” Deputy fires. Man goes down, finally dumps the sword, and deputies start aid. Suspect identified as Joshua Dribin, 22. Charges include assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer, resisting with force, exhibiting a deadly weapon at an officer to resist, and obstructing. KCSO later said the shoot was within policy.

Katie K USA

203,449 views • 25 days ago

Bully cop that wants to flex his authority, gets trolled throughout the stop and completely owned once the stop was over. Deputy Brian Morris (Badge #814) pulls over a driver named Travis near White Creek Baptist Church. Almost immediately after establishing the reason for the stop, Deputy Morris orders Travis to step out of his vehicle. When Travis asks why he needs to get out of the car for a simple equipment violation, Deputy Morris cites the landmark 1977 Supreme Court case Pennsylvania v. Mimms, which established that law enforcement officers have the authority to order drivers out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety. However when asked if this was for safety he replied not necessarily. Once outside, Travis is completely transparent and informs the deputy that he is legally carrying two firearms—one on his hip and another in an ankle holster—as well as a pocket knife. Deputy Morris insists on disarming Travis for the duration of the stop. Travis begins recording on his phone and pushes back, arguing that temporarily seizing his weapons when he is being fully cooperative and poses no threat is a clear violation of his Second and Fourth Amendment rights. He points out that under Terry v. Ohio, an individual must be considered both armed and dangerous to justify a search or seizure, arguing that legal firearm ownership alone shouldn't automatically make someone a target for disarming. Despite the back-and-forth legal argument, the interaction remains verbal. Deputy Morris temporarily secures the firearms, checks Travis’s license and information, and finds no issues. Travis does remind the deputy throughout the stop that he understands that the deputy is scared and that this might not be the right job for this deputy. In the end, Deputy Morris unloads the handguns, returns them along with the knife, and sends Travis on his way with a verbal warning for the brake light. Before driving off, Travis unloads on the deputy with a few strong thoughts on police overreach and constitutional rights. Does an officer's blanket policy on safety outweigh a compliant citizen's right to carry without interference during a minor traffic stop? I know where I stand on this, but would love to hear the thoughts of others.

Bully cop that wants to flex his authority, gets trolled throughout the stop and completely owned once the stop was over. Deputy Brian Morris (Badge #814) pulls over a driver named Travis near White Creek Baptist Church. Almost immediately after establishing the reason for the stop, Deputy Morris orders Travis to step out of his vehicle. When Travis asks why he needs to get out of the car for a simple equipment violation, Deputy Morris cites the landmark 1977 Supreme Court case Pennsylvania v. Mimms, which established that law enforcement officers have the authority to order drivers out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety. However when asked if this was for safety he replied not necessarily. Once outside, Travis is completely transparent and informs the deputy that he is legally carrying two firearms—one on his hip and another in an ankle holster—as well as a pocket knife. Deputy Morris insists on disarming Travis for the duration of the stop. Travis begins recording on his phone and pushes back, arguing that temporarily seizing his weapons when he is being fully cooperative and poses no threat is a clear violation of his Second and Fourth Amendment rights. He points out that under Terry v. Ohio, an individual must be considered both armed and dangerous to justify a search or seizure, arguing that legal firearm ownership alone shouldn't automatically make someone a target for disarming. Despite the back-and-forth legal argument, the interaction remains verbal. Deputy Morris temporarily secures the firearms, checks Travis’s license and information, and finds no issues. Travis does remind the deputy throughout the stop that he understands that the deputy is scared and that this might not be the right job for this deputy. In the end, Deputy Morris unloads the handguns, returns them along with the knife, and sends Travis on his way with a verbal warning for the brake light. Before driving off, Travis unloads on the deputy with a few strong thoughts on police overreach and constitutional rights. Does an officer's blanket policy on safety outweigh a compliant citizen's right to carry without interference during a minor traffic stop? I know where I stand on this, but would love to hear the thoughts of others.

Giggling Gannon

93,050 views • 2 months ago

📹Grundy County, Iowa — June 2022 Deputy Andrew Stanley was unhappy with a person looking at parked sheriff vehicles from public property outside the sheriff's station. He confronted her and tried to claim it was private property. Things became “suspicious” when she mentioned seeing his spit cup and refused to stop filming inside the vehicles. He decided to begin 'investigating' and demanded ID. Even after saying no crime had been established, the deputy threatened arrest for refusing to identify. Looking through a window from a public area is not a crime. Iowa still requires reasonable suspicion of an actual offense before an ID demand. ❓Are you surprised the deputy wasn't aware of under what circumstances he could demand ID? ❓Can a police officer take back “you’re under arrest” and act like it was never said if he changes his mind afterward?

📹Grundy County, Iowa — June 2022 Deputy Andrew Stanley was unhappy with a person looking at parked sheriff vehicles from public property outside the sheriff's station. He confronted her and tried to claim it was private property. Things became “suspicious” when she mentioned seeing his spit cup and refused to stop filming inside the vehicles. He decided to begin 'investigating' and demanded ID. Even after saying no crime had been established, the deputy threatened arrest for refusing to identify. Looking through a window from a public area is not a crime. Iowa still requires reasonable suspicion of an actual offense before an ID demand. ❓Are you surprised the deputy wasn't aware of under what circumstances he could demand ID? ❓Can a police officer take back “you’re under arrest” and act like it was never said if he changes his mind afterward?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

22,421 views • 8 days ago

Dude straight flexes on the cop but failed to see the other one coming up behind him. On July 12, 2026, what began as a welfare check on a recklessly driven black Jeep in Greendale, Wisconsin quickly escalated into a chaotic confrontation. The first responding officer located the Jeep after it was seen traveling the wrong way and swerving toward other vehicles, he initiated a traffic stop. The moment the officer pulled up behind him, Alabbas jumped out of his vehicle, ignored commands to stay inside, and began shouting at the officer to sh00t him. The lone officer deployed his Taser, but the Taser was ineffective. Alabbas seemed to get more charged up by this and sprinted directly at the retreating officer. Both the officer and Alabbas swung, but it was Alabbas that was on the better end of the exchange. The officer retreated and fell to the ground with Alabbas hovering over him. The officer was very lucky that another officer arrived that was able to subdue Alabbas. Even while pinned and handcuffed, Alabbas continued a delusional tirade—proclaiming he was "God," shouting threats, and kicking against squad car doors. The assaulted officer sustained a minor injury from the confrontation, but remained on scene to coordinate the arrest. Alabbas was booked into the Milwaukee County Jail on multiple charges: • Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) • Second-Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety • Threatening a Law Enforcement Officer • Discharging Bodily Fluids at an Officer • Resisting an Officer He was held without bond pending initial court appearances. While I feel bad for the officer that was struck, I will say that he was crying like big baby. While editing this video I cut out multiple mins of him crying about how many times he was struck to any other officer on the scene that would listen. Hate it see what he would do with a more serious type injury not just a little ouchy by his eye. 😂

Dude straight flexes on the cop but failed to see the other one coming up behind him. On July 12, 2026, what began as a welfare check on a recklessly driven black Jeep in Greendale, Wisconsin quickly escalated into a chaotic confrontation. The first responding officer located the Jeep after it was seen traveling the wrong way and swerving toward other vehicles, he initiated a traffic stop. The moment the officer pulled up behind him, Alabbas jumped out of his vehicle, ignored commands to stay inside, and began shouting at the officer to sh00t him. The lone officer deployed his Taser, but the Taser was ineffective. Alabbas seemed to get more charged up by this and sprinted directly at the retreating officer. Both the officer and Alabbas swung, but it was Alabbas that was on the better end of the exchange. The officer retreated and fell to the ground with Alabbas hovering over him. The officer was very lucky that another officer arrived that was able to subdue Alabbas. Even while pinned and handcuffed, Alabbas continued a delusional tirade—proclaiming he was "God," shouting threats, and kicking against squad car doors. The assaulted officer sustained a minor injury from the confrontation, but remained on scene to coordinate the arrest. Alabbas was booked into the Milwaukee County Jail on multiple charges: • Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) • Second-Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety • Threatening a Law Enforcement Officer • Discharging Bodily Fluids at an Officer • Resisting an Officer He was held without bond pending initial court appearances. While I feel bad for the officer that was struck, I will say that he was crying like big baby. While editing this video I cut out multiple mins of him crying about how many times he was struck to any other officer on the scene that would listen. Hate it see what he would do with a more serious type injury not just a little ouchy by his eye. 😂

Giggling Gannon

106,360 views • 24 days ago

Footage of an officer (the same one who pulled him out of his vehicle) forcibly taking a handcuffed Tyreek Hill to the ground Hill was asked to sit. He replies that he’ll comply, but he just had surgery on his knee. The officer came from offscreen to “redirect” him to the ground

Footage of an officer (the same one who pulled him out of his vehicle) forcibly taking a handcuffed Tyreek Hill to the ground Hill was asked to sit. He replies that he’ll comply, but he just had surgery on his knee. The officer came from offscreen to “redirect” him to the ground

Marcel Louis-Jacques

1,394,958 views • 2 years ago

Tyrant cop gets his feelings hurt by a camera. Owned from beginning to the end by this journalist. We are in unincorporated Riverside County, California, when a bystander stepped in to film a routine traffic stop involving Riverside Police Department Field Training Officer (FTO) Vicente De La Torre (Badge #1222) and backup Officer Miller (Badge #1565). The journalist, immediately challenged Officer De La Torre’s legal authority, arguing that because the stop was taking place in unincorporated county territory, the municipal city officer lacked jurisdiction to conduct traffic enforcement. The journalist kept shouting legal advice to the driver that was pulled over, urging him to invoke his 5th Amendment and fight the ticket because the officer had no jurisdiction. Officer De La Torre got his ego crushed and decided to confront the journalists. This verbal takedown only got worse for the officer from there. The journalist held his ground, reminding the officer that purely verbal commentary while recording from a public vantage point is First Amendment-protected activity, famously firing back that "interference is not speech." The situation escalated further when Officer De La Torre reached toward his taser, the journalist threw out immediate accusations of officer intimidation under California’s Tom Bane Civil Rights Act and warnings of personal liability under Malley v. Briggs. When Officer Miller arrived on scene to check if backup was needed, De La Torre was wrapping up and getting ready to do the walk of shame as he knew his conduct was out of line when his feelings got hurt and it's all on film. This is how to handle a Tyrant. This dude owned him from the beginning to the very end.

Tyrant cop gets his feelings hurt by a camera. Owned from beginning to the end by this journalist. We are in unincorporated Riverside County, California, when a bystander stepped in to film a routine traffic stop involving Riverside Police Department Field Training Officer (FTO) Vicente De La Torre (Badge #1222) and backup Officer Miller (Badge #1565). The journalist, immediately challenged Officer De La Torre’s legal authority, arguing that because the stop was taking place in unincorporated county territory, the municipal city officer lacked jurisdiction to conduct traffic enforcement. The journalist kept shouting legal advice to the driver that was pulled over, urging him to invoke his 5th Amendment and fight the ticket because the officer had no jurisdiction. Officer De La Torre got his ego crushed and decided to confront the journalists. This verbal takedown only got worse for the officer from there. The journalist held his ground, reminding the officer that purely verbal commentary while recording from a public vantage point is First Amendment-protected activity, famously firing back that "interference is not speech." The situation escalated further when Officer De La Torre reached toward his taser, the journalist threw out immediate accusations of officer intimidation under California’s Tom Bane Civil Rights Act and warnings of personal liability under Malley v. Briggs. When Officer Miller arrived on scene to check if backup was needed, De La Torre was wrapping up and getting ready to do the walk of shame as he knew his conduct was out of line when his feelings got hurt and it's all on film. This is how to handle a Tyrant. This dude owned him from the beginning to the very end.

Giggling Gannon

97,087 views • 1 month ago