Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is really mind blowing and everyone in America needs to hear this Tucker Carlson interview on SSRIs, antidepressants and mental health chemical imbalances “You can stick needles into people's spine and you can draw out fluid and you can look at the metabolites of things like serotonin and... you can get depressed people and undepressed people and say, Is there any difference in the actual amount of serotonin floating around in the brain? Every time they've done this, they have not found that there is any difference between depressed and undepressed people.” “There's no difference?” “There is no difference, because that's why we don't use any biological markers in the diagnosis of any psychiatric conditions. No brain scans, no blood tests. They're not useful because there are no ways, you know, like actual biological ways to differentiate depressed people from undepressed people.” “Are you serious?” “Absolutely, and the way they justify it was, well, okay, so we haven't found it yet, but it must be a medical problem and we're eventually gonna find it. And rather than admitting that, in the meantime, we'll just tell people it's a chemical imbalance because it's an easy, it's, it's an easy kind of like metaphor for them to understand and it helps us dish out the drugs without people asking too many questions.” “But it's untrue. It's untrue. Therefore, physicians should not say that or they should lose their medical license.”show more

Wall Street Apes

1,394,183 subscribers

678,381 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilik Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 Psychiatrist Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring Says the ‘Chemical Imbalance’ Narrative For Depression Was a ‘White Lie’ “They have not found that there is any difference between depressed and un-depressed people … That's why we don't use any biological markers in the diagnosis of any psychiatric conditions.”

🚨 Psychiatrist Dr. Josef Witt-Doerring Says the ‘Chemical Imbalance’ Narrative For Depression Was a ‘White Lie’ “They have not found that there is any difference between depressed and un-depressed people … That's why we don't use any biological markers in the diagnosis of any psychiatric conditions.”

Chief Nerd

158,311 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

ELON CLIPS

33,631 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

TRUMP: And there's actually very little difference between the people. I mean, you know, it's like the Russians and Ukrainian people. And they can get along. ————————————————— “We had a month…35,000 (KIA) two months ago. And I would say more Russians. But it's just, they're people. They're people. And there's actually very little difference between the people. I mean, you know, it's like the Russians and Ukrainian people. And they can get along. But, but it's a nasty war” - American President on Wed, Jul 8, 2026 in Ankara, Turkey, during the NATO Summit. P.S. Nothing triggers the average Ukrainian more than comparing them to russians.

TRUMP: And there's actually very little difference between the people. I mean, you know, it's like the Russians and Ukrainian people. And they can get along. ————————————————— “We had a month…35,000 (KIA) two months ago. And I would say more Russians. But it's just, they're people. They're people. And there's actually very little difference between the people. I mean, you know, it's like the Russians and Ukrainian people. And they can get along. But, but it's a nasty war” - American President on Wed, Jul 8, 2026 in Ankara, Turkey, during the NATO Summit. P.S. Nothing triggers the average Ukrainian more than comparing them to russians.

Kateryna Lisunova

101,352 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Curtis Yarvin on how "the Left" has executed population replacement in the White Dominions as a "stalk and charge." "This is a predator... [and] they're starting to speed run...mass immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year...[it's] 10... to 100 million a year" This clip of Yarvin (Curtis Yarvin), a political blogger and software developer (according to Wikipedia), is taken from a conversation with Peter McCormack (Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪) posted to McCormack's eponymous YouTube channel on February 23, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "You might think that people getting red-pilled in various ways is something that would really put a stop to this craziness of population replacement. Oh, no, actually it's quite very much the reverse. "Because there's something anyone who's totally lost faith in the Left, in a way, they have many complaints with the Left. But it all boils down to, you basically recognize that this is not a vegetarian thing. This is a predator, right? "And so this is a predator. And so when a predator such as a lion is hunting, there are basically two phases of the pursuit. There's the stalk and the charge. And the stalk is like, well, nobody really knows what's going on here. Like, let's take the demographic replacement in the U.S. It's from the, you know, the 1965 Immigration Act. And politicians swore up and down that this was not what it, what it was. Basically, since that act, basically it's brought like 100 million people from the third world into the US, right? "Something like that. Solid, solid numbers like that. And, but in order to sort of do that, you know, you couldn't have this giant boat lift where, you know, some gigantic version of the Empire Windrush brought 100 million people at the same time. It's more a case of like, you know, slowly, slowly, catchy, catchy fish, right? You know, where you're kind of tickling it and you're like, oh yeah, oh yeah, our friends from, you know, we're open, our hearts are welcoming, right? "You know, like all of this, like, you know, stuff that's just of course, unbelievably sinister because it's sort of trading on people's goodwill and people's good wishes. It's like this con. But the thing is, when people, when enough people see the con, and all of these systems are incentive-based, they're not based on planning, the Left is not run by some cabal. It's incentives that drive things. "What you're seeing, especially in what used to be called the white dominions, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, especially is you're seeing they're starting to speed run, they're starting to come out of their crouch and basically just be like, yeah, actually we're, I mean in the 21st century, I think they've increased the population of Canada by like 35%. Right? "And so even that is small. Even that is small. The Spanish government was just like, we're going to legalize 500,000. Oh, but that's just an estimate. That's just an estimate of how many people that plan will suck in it probably will be more like over a million. Right. "And so you know and those people are Schengen. They can go anywhere in Europe and you will see them do that and the like and and so what you could see in the US if basically the next time Democrats win the presidency people go on about like mass immigration. Like no, we've not seen mass immigration. You have no idea what mass immigration is. "Mass Immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year. Mass immigration starts I I would call it mass until it was like 10 a year. And like mass immigration is really the 10 to 50 to 100 million a year. But that's what could spark civil war. No, no— I don't know I'm seeing it here. No because people have no balls. People have no balls—"

Curtis Yarvin on how "the Left" has executed population replacement in the White Dominions as a "stalk and charge." "This is a predator... [and] they're starting to speed run...mass immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year...[it's] 10... to 100 million a year" This clip of Yarvin (Curtis Yarvin), a political blogger and software developer (according to Wikipedia), is taken from a conversation with Peter McCormack (Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪) posted to McCormack's eponymous YouTube channel on February 23, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "You might think that people getting red-pilled in various ways is something that would really put a stop to this craziness of population replacement. Oh, no, actually it's quite very much the reverse. "Because there's something anyone who's totally lost faith in the Left, in a way, they have many complaints with the Left. But it all boils down to, you basically recognize that this is not a vegetarian thing. This is a predator, right? "And so this is a predator. And so when a predator such as a lion is hunting, there are basically two phases of the pursuit. There's the stalk and the charge. And the stalk is like, well, nobody really knows what's going on here. Like, let's take the demographic replacement in the U.S. It's from the, you know, the 1965 Immigration Act. And politicians swore up and down that this was not what it, what it was. Basically, since that act, basically it's brought like 100 million people from the third world into the US, right? "Something like that. Solid, solid numbers like that. And, but in order to sort of do that, you know, you couldn't have this giant boat lift where, you know, some gigantic version of the Empire Windrush brought 100 million people at the same time. It's more a case of like, you know, slowly, slowly, catchy, catchy fish, right? You know, where you're kind of tickling it and you're like, oh yeah, oh yeah, our friends from, you know, we're open, our hearts are welcoming, right? "You know, like all of this, like, you know, stuff that's just of course, unbelievably sinister because it's sort of trading on people's goodwill and people's good wishes. It's like this con. But the thing is, when people, when enough people see the con, and all of these systems are incentive-based, they're not based on planning, the Left is not run by some cabal. It's incentives that drive things. "What you're seeing, especially in what used to be called the white dominions, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, especially is you're seeing they're starting to speed run, they're starting to come out of their crouch and basically just be like, yeah, actually we're, I mean in the 21st century, I think they've increased the population of Canada by like 35%. Right? "And so even that is small. Even that is small. The Spanish government was just like, we're going to legalize 500,000. Oh, but that's just an estimate. That's just an estimate of how many people that plan will suck in it probably will be more like over a million. Right. "And so you know and those people are Schengen. They can go anywhere in Europe and you will see them do that and the like and and so what you could see in the US if basically the next time Democrats win the presidency people go on about like mass immigration. Like no, we've not seen mass immigration. You have no idea what mass immigration is. "Mass Immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year. Mass immigration starts I I would call it mass until it was like 10 a year. And like mass immigration is really the 10 to 50 to 100 million a year. But that's what could spark civil war. No, no— I don't know I'm seeing it here. No because people have no balls. People have no balls—"

Sense Receptor

246,630 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Caleb Hammer says you don’t need formal qualifications to give simple personal finance and budgeting advice. "A criticism I get a lot is that I'm not qualified. But there's no degree in personal finance and budgeting. That's not a thing. There are certifications, you can be an accountant or investment advisor, but for what we do there is no certification. It's so simple. Spend less than you make. That's it." "The show is chaotic, it's a mess, Springer energy, but oftentimes it's a wake-up call. People reflect on it and they're afraid of being embarrassed on the follow-up. They want to get their shit together. A big part of it is they don't want to come back on and look like they didn't do anything." "Most people follow up because they were fans of the show before they came on and our onboarding is so thorough that people aren't too upset going into it."

Caleb Hammer says you don’t need formal qualifications to give simple personal finance and budgeting advice. "A criticism I get a lot is that I'm not qualified. But there's no degree in personal finance and budgeting. That's not a thing. There are certifications, you can be an accountant or investment advisor, but for what we do there is no certification. It's so simple. Spend less than you make. That's it." "The show is chaotic, it's a mess, Springer energy, but oftentimes it's a wake-up call. People reflect on it and they're afraid of being embarrassed on the follow-up. They want to get their shit together. A big part of it is they don't want to come back on and look like they didn't do anything." "Most people follow up because they were fans of the show before they came on and our onboarding is so thorough that people aren't too upset going into it."

Tig

44,406 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

DEI hire Ketanji Brown Jackson doesn't understand why the law needs to be changed to ban trans athletes in women's sports. "We are asking whether even though this law is over broad, we're assuming its over broad because you have some people in there to whom it should not be applied. What do we do about that? What's the remedy those people can get? What I hear you saying is they get no remedy unless they can demonstrate that there are enough people that this is sufficiently overbroad that it is no longer something the state can do.I don't understand why that is. Why wouldn't when we identify people for whom this law operates unconstitutionally, that's the premise. I'm in remedy. The premise it you have a person who successfully made an as-applied cage. To me it's unconstitutional. You say too bad if you can say it's unconstitutional to a sizeable number of people."

DEI hire Ketanji Brown Jackson doesn't understand why the law needs to be changed to ban trans athletes in women's sports. "We are asking whether even though this law is over broad, we're assuming its over broad because you have some people in there to whom it should not be applied. What do we do about that? What's the remedy those people can get? What I hear you saying is they get no remedy unless they can demonstrate that there are enough people that this is sufficiently overbroad that it is no longer something the state can do.I don't understand why that is. Why wouldn't when we identify people for whom this law operates unconstitutionally, that's the premise. I'm in remedy. The premise it you have a person who successfully made an as-applied cage. To me it's unconstitutional. You say too bad if you can say it's unconstitutional to a sizeable number of people."

DeVory Darkins

55,996 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Chamath: “The Palantir short is stupid.” “The Palantir short is stupid, and I think that those people will lose money.” “The thing that the people that are shorting this company don't understand is that all of these other businesses that you put up there, there is a viable competitor of some kind that you can switch to.” “Look at the one with the lowest multiple to sales, MongoDB. There's 90 versions of what MongoDB does.” “I'm not gonna say whether MongoDB is good or bad. It’s actually a good company. It's an extremely well run business, but it's not unique. It's just extremely well run.” “Snowflake is not unique, but it is well run.” “Palantir is both unique and well run, and there's no clear alternative, so there's no place to churn to.” “And so I think the reason why it has a premium valuation is because the duration and the durability of these cash flows are much longer than what you would typically see in any of these other companies.” “And if people took 1/1000th of a second to actually use their brain, they'd come to that conclusion.”

Chamath: “The Palantir short is stupid.” “The Palantir short is stupid, and I think that those people will lose money.” “The thing that the people that are shorting this company don't understand is that all of these other businesses that you put up there, there is a viable competitor of some kind that you can switch to.” “Look at the one with the lowest multiple to sales, MongoDB. There's 90 versions of what MongoDB does.” “I'm not gonna say whether MongoDB is good or bad. It’s actually a good company. It's an extremely well run business, but it's not unique. It's just extremely well run.” “Snowflake is not unique, but it is well run.” “Palantir is both unique and well run, and there's no clear alternative, so there's no place to churn to.” “And so I think the reason why it has a premium valuation is because the duration and the durability of these cash flows are much longer than what you would typically see in any of these other companies.” “And if people took 1/1000th of a second to actually use their brain, they'd come to that conclusion.”

The All-In Podcast

282,007 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.

Curtis Houck

175,437 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Inversion Yes it's true, you can even cure cancer with it. But the problem is that they can't make any money if people find out. And we are so addicted to sugar. That fasting is not easy.

Inversion Yes it's true, you can even cure cancer with it. But the problem is that they can't make any money if people find out. And we are so addicted to sugar. That fasting is not easy.

Leon denkt🤔 met vrijheid zelf (des?)informatie.

492,353 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Philadelphia Officer Says The City Is No Longer Putting Up With The Crime Wave “The mayor, the commissioner and the governor said we gonna do something about the theft. They passed new legislation that they're going after people” “That's not gonna happen anymore. Not the city of Philadelphia. You're gonna get prosecuted, and it's gonna be a felony. It ain't gonna be on misdemeanor.” Interviewer “Can you say something to the youth, please, about all this morning?” Officer “Well, all I have to say to the youth is put down the gun because if you come here with a gun, the chances are you're not gonna make it home. I hate to say it like that, but we have to keep it real. This is killing us. I've never seen it like this before where young people shoot up a bus depot station, 40 rounds, and shoot innocent people. Something must be done. I say this to the parents. Go in your children's room, tear it apart and find that gun. Because when they kill somebody, that's on you. You can't say, well, my child ain't you know what your children are doing. It is your job. That's your house. You own it. You are the commander in that chief in that house. Go to your children's house your room and look for these weapons. Stop it before it's too late. Either you're burying your child or you're going up to prison every month, visiting your child. It takes a community to stop this. It's not just on the police department. That's why we are out there. But it's not all about locking people up. You have to educate these people. You have to educate these young people. Guns is not the way. But there's a group of them that believe in robbing and stealing and killing. And those are the ones we have to capture and put away.“

Philadelphia Officer Says The City Is No Longer Putting Up With The Crime Wave “The mayor, the commissioner and the governor said we gonna do something about the theft. They passed new legislation that they're going after people” “That's not gonna happen anymore. Not the city of Philadelphia. You're gonna get prosecuted, and it's gonna be a felony. It ain't gonna be on misdemeanor.” Interviewer “Can you say something to the youth, please, about all this morning?” Officer “Well, all I have to say to the youth is put down the gun because if you come here with a gun, the chances are you're not gonna make it home. I hate to say it like that, but we have to keep it real. This is killing us. I've never seen it like this before where young people shoot up a bus depot station, 40 rounds, and shoot innocent people. Something must be done. I say this to the parents. Go in your children's room, tear it apart and find that gun. Because when they kill somebody, that's on you. You can't say, well, my child ain't you know what your children are doing. It is your job. That's your house. You own it. You are the commander in that chief in that house. Go to your children's house your room and look for these weapons. Stop it before it's too late. Either you're burying your child or you're going up to prison every month, visiting your child. It takes a community to stop this. It's not just on the police department. That's why we are out there. But it's not all about locking people up. You have to educate these people. You have to educate these young people. Guns is not the way. But there's a group of them that believe in robbing and stealing and killing. And those are the ones we have to capture and put away.“

Wall Street Apes

4,036,681 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Sad to say that there is no expenditure being made by the State Government of #Odisha for the people of this state and for their development. Time and again this has been brought to the attention of #Odisha Government by Biju Janata Dal that there must be some expenditure for the development of the people of the state, but they seem to be totally neglectful about this. Everyone is suffering. It's not exclusive to any people, it is everyone that is suffering. It's like they're playing on empty vessels, and we all know that empty vessels make a good sound, and that's what they're satisfied by. #BJDWithOdisha

Sad to say that there is no expenditure being made by the State Government of #Odisha for the people of this state and for their development. Time and again this has been brought to the attention of #Odisha Government by Biju Janata Dal that there must be some expenditure for the development of the people of the state, but they seem to be totally neglectful about this. Everyone is suffering. It's not exclusive to any people, it is everyone that is suffering. It's like they're playing on empty vessels, and we all know that empty vessels make a good sound, and that's what they're satisfied by. #BJDWithOdisha

Naveen Patnaik

29,681 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Yunjin talks about her favourite quote “Have enough courage to trust love one more time and always one more time” — Maya Angelou I've actually met a lot of like the most important people in my life right now, one of the biggest lessons that they've taught me is that you should always give people a second chance, because people are capable of change. And if you nurture them and give them the right environment to flourish, then they can really become anything. And I think that's a very important thing to realize the more that you get older, because it's really easy to limit yourself and limit others and be like, oh no, that's just the way they are. They will never change and, you know, I shouldn't even try to get them to change because that's just how they are and they're gonna stay like that forever. Because that, I feel like kind of makes it really easy for you to get really apathetic and not really care about things that maybe we should be caring about, like helping each other grow as people and, you know, trusting humanity.

Yunjin talks about her favourite quote “Have enough courage to trust love one more time and always one more time” — Maya Angelou I've actually met a lot of like the most important people in my life right now, one of the biggest lessons that they've taught me is that you should always give people a second chance, because people are capable of change. And if you nurture them and give them the right environment to flourish, then they can really become anything. And I think that's a very important thing to realize the more that you get older, because it's really easy to limit yourself and limit others and be like, oh no, that's just the way they are. They will never change and, you know, I shouldn't even try to get them to change because that's just how they are and they're gonna stay like that forever. Because that, I feel like kind of makes it really easy for you to get really apathetic and not really care about things that maybe we should be caring about, like helping each other grow as people and, you know, trusting humanity.

fimloops

55,458 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Question: My sister doesn't wear a hijab, but she is very good. Is it far-fetched to say that? Shaykh Shadee Elmasry: "Someone can be excellent in many aspects but weak in one. No, it's not far off. Allah will reward her for the good that she does, but she will have to explain why she didn't obey Allah in another command. You can be very pious in an area that comes easily to you, but in another, you might struggle because it's difficult, and you haven't found the strength to overcome it. Isn't that true for all of us? The difference is that with a woman who doesn't wear a hijab, it's more obvious because it's something outward. If you ask any man, he might find many things easy but struggle with a few private matters that we can't see. This isn't a permissive attitude; it's simply a description of reality. So, are you saying they're sinful? Yes, they are sinful. But we all commit sins and should make Tawbah (repentance). This message is for all of us, not just one of us. The reason it stands out is because it's an external deed." Dr. Shadee Elmasry

Question: My sister doesn't wear a hijab, but she is very good. Is it far-fetched to say that? Shaykh Shadee Elmasry: "Someone can be excellent in many aspects but weak in one. No, it's not far off. Allah will reward her for the good that she does, but she will have to explain why she didn't obey Allah in another command. You can be very pious in an area that comes easily to you, but in another, you might struggle because it's difficult, and you haven't found the strength to overcome it. Isn't that true for all of us? The difference is that with a woman who doesn't wear a hijab, it's more obvious because it's something outward. If you ask any man, he might find many things easy but struggle with a few private matters that we can't see. This isn't a permissive attitude; it's simply a description of reality. So, are you saying they're sinful? Yes, they are sinful. But we all commit sins and should make Tawbah (repentance). This message is for all of us, not just one of us. The reason it stands out is because it's an external deed." Dr. Shadee Elmasry

Akbar Zab

86,595 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,718 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

jordan peterson on why people actually fall apart: 1. as a psychologist, you learn something almost nobody expects. people don't come to you with a mental illness. they come to you because their life got too complicated to stay on top of. 2. complexity is the real problem. when it slips beyond your control, it causes suffering. and that suffering is what breaks people. 3. it's almost never one thing. it's three or four hitting at once. you lose your job. the economy collapses. someone you love dies. then you get sick. and you look around and think there's no getting out of this. 4. picture a balloon. blow it up past what it can hold and it bursts at the weakest spot. people are the same. keep piling complexity onto someone and they blow out wherever they're weakest. one starts drinking. another gets depressed. another gets anxiety or ocd. that's the "mental illness." but it's really just collapse in the direction of your weakness. 5. and sometimes it goes further. life gets so complex that people would rather be dead. that's what a lot of suicide actually is. not wanting to die. wanting the complexity to stop.

jordan peterson on why people actually fall apart: 1. as a psychologist, you learn something almost nobody expects. people don't come to you with a mental illness. they come to you because their life got too complicated to stay on top of. 2. complexity is the real problem. when it slips beyond your control, it causes suffering. and that suffering is what breaks people. 3. it's almost never one thing. it's three or four hitting at once. you lose your job. the economy collapses. someone you love dies. then you get sick. and you look around and think there's no getting out of this. 4. picture a balloon. blow it up past what it can hold and it bursts at the weakest spot. people are the same. keep piling complexity onto someone and they blow out wherever they're weakest. one starts drinking. another gets depressed. another gets anxiety or ocd. that's the "mental illness." but it's really just collapse in the direction of your weakness. 5. and sometimes it goes further. life gets so complex that people would rather be dead. that's what a lot of suicide actually is. not wanting to die. wanting the complexity to stop.

Naruto

81,704 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Stephen Chow on the reason for the popularity of "Shaolin Soccer" (2001): "Interviewer: Do you think people are drawn to the movie because of the martial arts aspect or because it's a comedy, because soccer [football] is popular, or because of the love story? Chow: All of that. You've given a perfect answer. Some people just like it because it's soccer and some people just like the comedy, and some people like special effect, and some people like the drama. I read a lot of critics in Asia that they think it is not only a comedy but also a drama. And you find I don't know how to say in English—I'm sorry—you just—after you watch a movie, then you—it's some kind of feeling— like a long time ago, after watching a movie, I was full of energy and I just wanted to go learn Kung-fu—you know I kicking and punching, you know. A feeling like that. It's something. Some kind of thing like when you explode. After you watch a movie and you're full of energy and you so confident of yourself and you think you can make it. That you can solve any problems." (Stephen Chow's interview with Kristin Lootens, Premiere, 2007) P.S: On this day, 25 years ago, "Shaolin Soccer" (2001) was released in China.

Stephen Chow on the reason for the popularity of "Shaolin Soccer" (2001): "Interviewer: Do you think people are drawn to the movie because of the martial arts aspect or because it's a comedy, because soccer [football] is popular, or because of the love story? Chow: All of that. You've given a perfect answer. Some people just like it because it's soccer and some people just like the comedy, and some people like special effect, and some people like the drama. I read a lot of critics in Asia that they think it is not only a comedy but also a drama. And you find I don't know how to say in English—I'm sorry—you just—after you watch a movie, then you—it's some kind of feeling— like a long time ago, after watching a movie, I was full of energy and I just wanted to go learn Kung-fu—you know I kicking and punching, you know. A feeling like that. It's something. Some kind of thing like when you explode. After you watch a movie and you're full of energy and you so confident of yourself and you think you can make it. That you can solve any problems." (Stephen Chow's interview with Kristin Lootens, Premiere, 2007) P.S: On this day, 25 years ago, "Shaolin Soccer" (2001) was released in China.

DepressedBergman

20,192 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce