Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This is sparking a real debate… 🌯 A customer went into Chipotle and asked for extra rice—something many people believe is supposed to be free. But this time, the manager stepped in and said he’d have to charge for it. What should’ve been a simple request instantly turned into...

DrAlmarielao's profile picture

Dr.L

47,774 subscribers

623,673 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

GamingEssenNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dr. CZ
Dr. CZvor 5 Monaten

The manager's right. "Extra" rice isn't free by definition—it's portion control to keep costs down and prevent abuse during promos. Customers expecting unlimited add-ons for free are why prices keep rising everywhere. Consistency matters, but so does not turning "free" into an all-you-can-eat loophole. Would still hit Chipotle though

Profilbild von Dr.L
Dr.Lvor 5 Monaten

Exactly @AngelMD1103 Extra = extra, not unlimited. Portion control keeps the BOGO deals alive instead of turning Chipotle into an all-you-can-eat loophole. Smart call, manager!

Profilbild von Matt ×ᴗ×
Matt ×ᴗ×vor 5 Monaten

why are people still eating at chipotle

Profilbild von Memphis DC
Memphis DCvor 5 Monaten

What a bunch of losers! Anything extra should legitimately carry a cost. Otherwise sure. I'll have a bowl with 9 scoops of rice and extra everything so I can feed my entire family. Stop being cheap ass losers and pay for what you want....

Profilbild von AKA JL
AKA JLvor 5 Monaten

The manager was saying that he was on scoop number 5, which is a bit excessive

Profilbild von America is the answer, not China.
America is the answer, not China.vor 5 Monaten

Watch the video, the asshole wants five extra scoops, not one.

Profilbild von Great Leader
Great Leadervor 5 Monaten

extra rice means 1 extra scoop for free. not infinite scoops. Clearly they're trying to take advantage of the chipotle after the viral "get all free extra if you record" tiktok bullshit. the manager is in the right. dont tolerate their bullshit. kick them out.

Profilbild von GTFOH
GTFOHvor 5 Monaten

No fuck you, pussy boy. Stop with that it’s free. When you come in phone a blazing talking shit - you have lost the battle !!!!!!!

Profilbild von Julissa Nunez
Julissa Nunezvor 5 Monaten

If it was always free, you can’t suddenly switch up without clearly telling customers. That’s how frustration starts. At the same time, people do take advantage, so I understand a manager trying to control portions. The real issue is consistency. Either it’s free or it’s not, but it shouldn’t depend on who’s behind the counter that day. Businesses lose more customers from confusion than from giving an extra scoop of rice.

Profilbild von Kyben36
Kyben36vor 5 Monaten

you can literally request extra rice or beans in the app? at no cost. so manager is wrong. meat tells u there is an extra

Profilbild von NomNom Cowboy
NomNom Cowboyvor 5 Monaten

Last time I got a Chipotle burrito it was almost ALL rice and I was like “I have a rice cooker at home, I can make this myself” and I never went back

Profilbild von Bold_And_Sassy
Bold_And_Sassyvor 5 Monaten

So, you think someone holding a camera, laughing, purposely antagonizing the workers where eventually you hear them yell “ICE” a couple of times after they threatened police. Let me ask you this, did you even watch the full video because why are you ok with them chanting ICE?

Profilbild von @wendyevans
@wendyevansvor 5 Monaten

If you want extra food you pay for it! I don’t care what it is!

Profilbild von Shimeon (Shim-EE-N)
Shimeon (Shim-EE-N)vor 5 Monaten

“It supposed to be free” Easiest way to show your level of intelligence. People like this is why good things get taken away from the masses but it turn into some race/class bs because that’s easy to manipulate people’s emotions. Even though she says, one scoop is free you got 5; it’s irrelevant to so many and because of that there will be no free scoops. Thank these asshats…

Profilbild von Mikey Aces
Mikey Acesvor 5 Monaten

I thought the manager was professional, these guys were giving her a hard time.

Profilbild von Script Trooper
Script Troopervor 5 Monaten

Meh, they reserve the right to charge, so just leave. People are so habitual when it comes to fast food they just can't simply say okay thanks bye.

Profilbild von BitcoinStreetBets
BitcoinStreetBetsvor 5 Monaten

@ChipotleTweets is garbage , I stopped going there years ago because they skim the food really bad

Profilbild von 🇺🇸AMFIRST 🇺🇸
🇺🇸AMFIRST 🇺🇸vor 5 Monaten

How do you define extra rice? Some times you go there and get a half scoop… the next time two full scoop. That’s always been my issue with them - inconsistency.

Profilbild von Modern-Day Debate
Modern-Day Debatevor 5 Monaten

@amwishart they're cracking down mah boi!

Profilbild von Joann
Joannvor 5 Monaten

These are the people who drive up the costs for everyone. Chipotle uses fresh, premium ingredients. Guess what? They cost money. Go to Taco Bell, and see if they even offer extra rice.

Profilbild von Zenakuu
Zenakuuvor 5 Monaten

Over priced franchise, stop eating at these places, making them wealthier and start cooking your own food.

Profilbild von Corey Blades
Corey Bladesvor 5 Monaten

These guys are trolling, but…. Everything other than the meat and guacamole should be included, not “free”, but you can get as much as you want (that fits the bowl). The only real cost is in the meats and their profit margin is definitely enough to cover the random person who wants some extra rice, beans, cheese, whatever. Most people don’t want extra filer…

Profilbild von TruthMayHURT
TruthMayHURTvor 5 Monaten

These people ruin it for everyone. Leave these people alone. They hook you up with an extra spoon but you still complain like a bitch

Profilbild von CryptoKen
CryptoKenvor 5 Monaten

@MrWhiteMAGA Chipotle has been consistently going downhill, it’s very easy to stop going there.

Profilbild von سرندیپیتی💙💜💗
سرندیپیتی💙💜💗vor 5 Monaten

I was on their side until they said ICE! Go fuck yourselves assholes, arguments can be resolved much faster and more efficiently when threats aren’t thrown around like it’s no big deal

Profilbild von Randell Christopher
Randell Christophervor 5 Monaten

Extra rice is free on the app.

Profilbild von DatBoyJaden
DatBoyJadenvor 5 Monaten

Extra rice and extra beans is supposed to be free. Chipotle has never charged and isn’t supposed to charge for anything extra other than a MEAT. Only chicken, and carne, al pastor is extra, not any of the grains or toppings. Unless you’re getting guacamole or queso blanco. 🥴

Profilbild von Gonzo
Gonzovor 5 Monaten

Sadly when enough people start taking advantage the company has an obligation to respond. Otherwise that’s just bad business

Profilbild von fernando reyes
fernando reyesvor 5 Monaten

Ya gotta be a new kind of stupid to assume “extra something” is free

Profilbild von GlobePulses
GlobePulsesvor 5 Monaten

Quick facts to cut through the noise: Chipotle's official policy lists rice as a free base protein option (like chicken or sofritas). Their menu board spells it out unlimited scoops within reason for that base. But "extra" beyond your standard portion? They've charged for it inconsistently since at least 2022, per their own FAQs and employee training docs. Managers have discretion to enforce portion control to avoid waste, especially post-pandemic when food costs spiked 20-30% industry-wide. Customer's side: Feels like bait-and-switch if it's been comped locally before. Loyalty builds on those unspoken perks why nickel-and-dime now? Manager's side: Portions average 4oz rice per bowl doubling up jacks costs without revenue. Chains like Chipotle lost billions in shrink from over-portioning pre-2023 crackdowns. Fair play when lines form and ingredients run dry.

Profilbild von Captain Ron
Captain Ronvor 5 Monaten

Fuck that nerd! Pay for the extra is you want extra

Profilbild von ColdChilling
ColdChillingvor 5 Monaten

These guys are asshats. Those bowls are full of rice. They just kelt asking for extra until they finally said they have to charge.

Profilbild von Alan
Alanvor 5 Monaten

Extra rice or extra drama? Honestly, if they start charging for everything that used to be free, I might just roll my own burrito at home.

Profilbild von Offinthedark
Offinthedarkvor 5 Monaten

Extra Rice is free on the app. Just checked.

Profilbild von Greg
Gregvor 5 Monaten

why bother these people? You had five scoops of rice! how much more could you eat your plate looked full, they should have had a big burly chef toss you out on your ass.

Profilbild von Whozae ✨️
Whozae ✨️vor 5 Monaten

Dawg I've been to Chipotle 1 time in my life it was also they last they mid AF and price is a Scam

Ähnliche Videos

A customer at Lowe’s was arguing with an employee about a product return. The situation kept escalating, and the store manager eventually stepped in. After several attempts to calm things down, the manager became visibly annoyed and told the customer that if they didn’t leave the store immediately, she would call the police. Customer service jobs can be challenging, especially when situations become heated. While businesses want to help customers, there are moments when maintaining safety and order in the store has to come first. At what point is it reasonable for a manager to ask a customer to leave a store?
0:57

A customer at Lowe’s was arguing with an employee about a product return. The situation kept escalating, and the store manager eventually stepped in. After several attempts to calm things down, the manager became visibly annoyed and told the customer that if they didn’t leave the store immediately, she would call the police. Customer service jobs can be challenging, especially when situations become heated. While businesses want to help customers, there are moments when maintaining safety and order in the store has to come first. At what point is it reasonable for a manager to ask a customer to leave a store?

Dr.L

231,997 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A customer walked into a Papa John’s and casually asked the cashier for their pizza recipe. Instead of brushing it off or laughing, the cashier felt suspicious and ended up calling the police! This feels so bizarre! It’s hard to imagine why a simple question about a recipe would escalate to involving the police. Maybe the customer acted suspiciously? What do you think really happened here? Do you think calling the cops over something like this was an overreaction, or could there have been more to the story?
3:06

A customer walked into a Papa John’s and casually asked the cashier for their pizza recipe. Instead of brushing it off or laughing, the cashier felt suspicious and ended up calling the police! This feels so bizarre! It’s hard to imagine why a simple question about a recipe would escalate to involving the police. Maybe the customer acted suspiciously? What do you think really happened here? Do you think calling the cops over something like this was an overreaction, or could there have been more to the story?

Dr.L

302,346 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”
0:50

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This is where it gets REALLY uncomfortable… She walks into a tattoo shop she’s been to before, same artist, same trust, no red flags. Everything feels normal. Safe, even. Then mid-session… everything changes. He finds out she’s recently single. And just like that, the tone shifts. The questions get personal. The energy feels off. And she’s sitting there thinking, something isn’t right. But here’s the part that makes this so intense… She can’t just leave. There’s a needle in her arm. Ink going into her skin. No easy exit. No pause button. Just her, stuck in that chair, trying to stay calm while things get more and more uncomfortable. “I’m trying to de-escalate… he has a needle in my arm.” That line says everything. Because now it’s not just awkward, it’s power. He’s in control of the situation, and she’s trying not to make it worse. What should’ve been a normal appointment turned into a moment where trust completely broke down. And that’s why people are heated… Was this just bad social awareness… or a serious violation of boundaries while someone was vulnerable? Because once that line is crossed, there’s no going back. Be real, was this completely out of line, or are people overreacting? And what would YOU do if you felt uncomfortable but physically couldn’t just get up and leave?
4:11

This is where it gets REALLY uncomfortable… She walks into a tattoo shop she’s been to before, same artist, same trust, no red flags. Everything feels normal. Safe, even. Then mid-session… everything changes. He finds out she’s recently single. And just like that, the tone shifts. The questions get personal. The energy feels off. And she’s sitting there thinking, something isn’t right. But here’s the part that makes this so intense… She can’t just leave. There’s a needle in her arm. Ink going into her skin. No easy exit. No pause button. Just her, stuck in that chair, trying to stay calm while things get more and more uncomfortable. “I’m trying to de-escalate… he has a needle in my arm.” That line says everything. Because now it’s not just awkward, it’s power. He’s in control of the situation, and she’s trying not to make it worse. What should’ve been a normal appointment turned into a moment where trust completely broke down. And that’s why people are heated… Was this just bad social awareness… or a serious violation of boundaries while someone was vulnerable? Because once that line is crossed, there’s no going back. Be real, was this completely out of line, or are people overreacting? And what would YOU do if you felt uncomfortable but physically couldn’t just get up and leave?

Dr. CZ

410,973 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jeff Bezos: “People who are right a lot change their mind a lot” “Because of AI, new technologies, and all the dynamism in the world, so many things are changing — and they’re changing rapidly,” Jeff observes. The best solution he’s found for dealing with this rapid change is “thinking long-term” because it forces you to ask yourself, “What are the points of stability?” and “What is not going to change?” He continues: “One of the things that changes very slowly is customer needs. So you can build a strategy around customer needs. That will have durability.” When building Amazon, for example, Jeff built the company around the customer needs of fast delivery, low prices, and vast selection. “The technologies will change. Your competitive set will change. Everything will change, except those customer needs,” Jeff argues. And it’s this idea that is behind Jeff’s core idea of “Be stubborn on the vision, and flexible on the details.” He explains: “You have to be [flexible on the details] because the world is changing and so you change your mind. I’ve noticed that people who are right a lot change their mind a lot. People who are wrong a lot are very stubborn on the details.” Source: Reuters (Oct 2025)
2:20

Jeff Bezos: “People who are right a lot change their mind a lot” “Because of AI, new technologies, and all the dynamism in the world, so many things are changing — and they’re changing rapidly,” Jeff observes. The best solution he’s found for dealing with this rapid change is “thinking long-term” because it forces you to ask yourself, “What are the points of stability?” and “What is not going to change?” He continues: “One of the things that changes very slowly is customer needs. So you can build a strategy around customer needs. That will have durability.” When building Amazon, for example, Jeff built the company around the customer needs of fast delivery, low prices, and vast selection. “The technologies will change. Your competitive set will change. Everything will change, except those customer needs,” Jeff argues. And it’s this idea that is behind Jeff’s core idea of “Be stubborn on the vision, and flexible on the details.” He explains: “You have to be [flexible on the details] because the world is changing and so you change your mind. I’ve noticed that people who are right a lot change their mind a lot. People who are wrong a lot are very stubborn on the details.” Source: Reuters (Oct 2025)

Startup Archive

100,699 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Lloyd Blankfein (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) on something most people get backwards about risk management: "you'd think a risk manager is always trying to repress people from taking risk." "sometimes a good risk manager has to promote the idea that people take risk. because that's what you're there for." "if you don't take risk, you don't move forward. there's no growth." "the alternative to never taking any risk will give you the comfort of not losing money for yourself or anybody else, but you also won't make progress." this is true inside Goldman Sachs and it's true in trading. after recovering a drawdown, the instinct can be to cut everything and take a break. sometimes the right risk management decision is the opposite, the system is working, the drawdown is normal, and pulling back is the actual mistake.
0:38

Lloyd Blankfein (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) on something most people get backwards about risk management: "you'd think a risk manager is always trying to repress people from taking risk." "sometimes a good risk manager has to promote the idea that people take risk. because that's what you're there for." "if you don't take risk, you don't move forward. there's no growth." "the alternative to never taking any risk will give you the comfort of not losing money for yourself or anybody else, but you also won't make progress." this is true inside Goldman Sachs and it's true in trading. after recovering a drawdown, the instinct can be to cut everything and take a break. sometimes the right risk management decision is the opposite, the system is working, the drawdown is normal, and pulling back is the actual mistake.

Goshawk Trades

20,832 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:
3:45

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

543,051 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Who's Into Polyamory? Polyamory gets stereotyped a lot, but the people drawn to it are not all one type. The more interesting question is why some people are willing to question the relationship script they were handed. This video isn’t about saying polyamory is better or monogamy is outdated. It’s about looking at why some people choose different structures, what that requires emotionally, and why “normal” is not always the same thing as “right for you.”
3:50

Who's Into Polyamory? Polyamory gets stereotyped a lot, but the people drawn to it are not all one type. The more interesting question is why some people are willing to question the relationship script they were handed. This video isn’t about saying polyamory is better or monogamy is outdated. It’s about looking at why some people choose different structures, what that requires emotionally, and why “normal” is not always the same thing as “right for you.”

Kate Shelor

23,811 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

It is astounding that once AGAIN the AEC is shutting down a candidate's right to free speech and to speak about her party's policies on the basis of complaints. In doing so the AEC is thwarting our democratic rights on the basis that activists are complaining or because some people are offended. This is truly dangerous territory for Australia. Please SHARE this video so that this authoritarianism is exposed. And a HUGE thank you to Victorian grandmother Rae Rancie for stepping into the political arena to be a voice for the voiceless. You are amazing 🤩
0:52

It is astounding that once AGAIN the AEC is shutting down a candidate's right to free speech and to speak about her party's policies on the basis of complaints. In doing so the AEC is thwarting our democratic rights on the basis that activists are complaining or because some people are offended. This is truly dangerous territory for Australia. Please SHARE this video so that this authoritarianism is exposed. And a HUGE thank you to Victorian grandmother Rae Rancie for stepping into the political arena to be a voice for the voiceless. You are amazing 🤩

Dr Joanna Howe

35,791 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She literally listed two egg chairs for FREE. Not discounted. Not negotiable. FREE. Clear picture. Clear description. One chair had a cushion, one didn’t. That’s it. And somehow… it STILL turned into chaos. Message after message, people asking questions already answered, trying to negotiate a price on something that costs $0, acting confused over the most basic details. It went from “I’m giving this away” to pure frustration real fast. That’s when she snapped, FULL rant mode. And honestly? A lot of people are saying she just said what everyone’s been thinking. Because, how does “free” still turn into this much drama?? At some point it’s not even about the item anymore… it’s about dealing with people. Be real, has Facebook Marketplace become more stress than it’s worth? And what’s the most ridiculous message you’ve ever gotten trying to sell (or give away) something?
2:46

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She literally listed two egg chairs for FREE. Not discounted. Not negotiable. FREE. Clear picture. Clear description. One chair had a cushion, one didn’t. That’s it. And somehow… it STILL turned into chaos. Message after message, people asking questions already answered, trying to negotiate a price on something that costs $0, acting confused over the most basic details. It went from “I’m giving this away” to pure frustration real fast. That’s when she snapped, FULL rant mode. And honestly? A lot of people are saying she just said what everyone’s been thinking. Because, how does “free” still turn into this much drama?? At some point it’s not even about the item anymore… it’s about dealing with people. Be real, has Facebook Marketplace become more stress than it’s worth? And what’s the most ridiculous message you’ve ever gotten trying to sell (or give away) something?

Dr. CZ

4,749,656 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”
1:59

.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”

Steve Guest

23,762 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Stop for a second. And be honest with yourself. How long has this been going on? How many times have you said “this is the last time”? How many times have you thought about changing… but didn’t follow through? You already know what’s happening. The question is: 👉 Are you going to keep repeating it 👉 Or actually interrupt it? Because nothing changes… until you do something different. Not think. Not plan. Not wait. Move. The 14-Day Self-Command Reset is open right now. Short window. Founding price. This is your chance to stop hiding and start building something real.
1:06

Stop for a second. And be honest with yourself. How long has this been going on? How many times have you said “this is the last time”? How many times have you thought about changing… but didn’t follow through? You already know what’s happening. The question is: 👉 Are you going to keep repeating it 👉 Or actually interrupt it? Because nothing changes… until you do something different. Not think. Not plan. Not wait. Move. The 14-Day Self-Command Reset is open right now. Short window. Founding price. This is your chance to stop hiding and start building something real.

Command Within | Build Self-Command

139,728 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?
1:43

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,553 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

She’s so right here. So right. People do not want a return to how things used to be. They want something better. I just wish she could condense what she said here in a minute and 30 seconds into 20 seconds or 30 seconds or 40 seconds, so people don’t tune out. She is so thoughtful and so deliberative in everything she says that she loses people in trying to make her point. I think this is why so many accuse her of this “word salad” nonsense. It’s not because she doesn’t know what she’s talking about, it’s because her prosecutor mind weighs the weight of every single word as she’s delivering a point. I don’t know how she retrains herself, but in this ecosystem she has to be able to just deliver the line, the thought, in a way that is concise. Like it or not, people have no attention span anymore.
1:31

She’s so right here. So right. People do not want a return to how things used to be. They want something better. I just wish she could condense what she said here in a minute and 30 seconds into 20 seconds or 30 seconds or 40 seconds, so people don’t tune out. She is so thoughtful and so deliberative in everything she says that she loses people in trying to make her point. I think this is why so many accuse her of this “word salad” nonsense. It’s not because she doesn’t know what she’s talking about, it’s because her prosecutor mind weighs the weight of every single word as she’s delivering a point. I don’t know how she retrains herself, but in this ecosystem she has to be able to just deliver the line, the thought, in a way that is concise. Like it or not, people have no attention span anymore.

That Gay Guy Candle Co. 🇺🇸

18,648 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This was at La Jolla Cove in La Jolla California. These people are swimming at the Cove but there is a good amount of Sea lions there. 😳 You can see one of the Sea lions almost run over a kid as it is trying to get back in the water and you can hear a voice over the loudspeaker telling people to please keep their distance from all the Sea lions. People argued about this saying that little beach was always meant for kids to swim at and has been that way for 40 years. But many others said that it has obviously changed and now we have Sea lions there and they should leave those Sea lions in peace and go find another beach. To me, the ocean, that is their home. There are plenty of other beaches to use. The people should be the ones to move, not the Sea lions. 💯 What is your opinion? Should they just keep it the way it is, let people around the Sea lions or should they close this small beach cove to the public in order to allow the Sea lions to be in peace?
0:26

This was at La Jolla Cove in La Jolla California. These people are swimming at the Cove but there is a good amount of Sea lions there. 😳 You can see one of the Sea lions almost run over a kid as it is trying to get back in the water and you can hear a voice over the loudspeaker telling people to please keep their distance from all the Sea lions. People argued about this saying that little beach was always meant for kids to swim at and has been that way for 40 years. But many others said that it has obviously changed and now we have Sea lions there and they should leave those Sea lions in peace and go find another beach. To me, the ocean, that is their home. There are plenty of other beaches to use. The people should be the ones to move, not the Sea lions. 💯 What is your opinion? Should they just keep it the way it is, let people around the Sea lions or should they close this small beach cove to the public in order to allow the Sea lions to be in peace?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

221,424 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Smith "I would say that it is a single judge who's made a decision and we have now 700,000 Albertans, whether they're on the remain side or the leave side, who've said that they want to have this public debate." "...I'll listen to my caucus and I'll listen to my cabinet because we are the duly elected representatives of the people of Alberta and this is a decision by one judge at a lower court level and it's appealable. And so because we think they have been incorrect in law, we will be appealing it." "we think that there may have been an error in law made here because the duty to consult has been interpreted normally when you're talking about a specific project like a pipeline project, which is what we're doing right now in consulting on a west coast pipeline route" "...This is not clear and so that's why we think it may be incorrect in law and why we will be appealing it. " "The proponent of that petition always intended for it to go to a referendum... so that is what the committee is grappling with right now since he seemed to have flip flopped and changed his mind after the fact." Danielle Smith
5:04

Smith "I would say that it is a single judge who's made a decision and we have now 700,000 Albertans, whether they're on the remain side or the leave side, who've said that they want to have this public debate." "...I'll listen to my caucus and I'll listen to my cabinet because we are the duly elected representatives of the people of Alberta and this is a decision by one judge at a lower court level and it's appealable. And so because we think they have been incorrect in law, we will be appealing it." "we think that there may have been an error in law made here because the duty to consult has been interpreted normally when you're talking about a specific project like a pipeline project, which is what we're doing right now in consulting on a west coast pipeline route" "...This is not clear and so that's why we think it may be incorrect in law and why we will be appealing it. " "The proponent of that petition always intended for it to go to a referendum... so that is what the committee is grappling with right now since he seemed to have flip flopped and changed his mind after the fact." Danielle Smith

cbcwatcher

57,068 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Biologist Dr. Heather Heying on the subject of the WNBA discussing the issue of transgender participation: "I don't know what the goal is. And I don't know if there's something bigger behind it that is trying to destroy all of the institutions of the West or just women's sports. I don't see why anyone would go, would target women's sports specifically. But, you know, at some level, getting people, getting women to defend the destruction of women's sports is quite a feat. And you got a lot of those doing that now. So, you know, at one level, women's sports is not as important as almost anything else we could possibly be talking about. But having, just as having gotten women to turn on family members and tell them they couldn't come inside for Thanksgiving if they hadn't gotten their insane Covid shot is something that you can't ever undo. And these people are now going to tie themselves in knots trying to explain themselves to themselves and to others. Once you have defended the right to destroy a system that in the 1970s you would have been on the opposite side of, because you would have been pro Title IX at that point — is something that you can't undo. And it weakens individuals when you get them to argue for something indefensible. "
14:47

Biologist Dr. Heather Heying on the subject of the WNBA discussing the issue of transgender participation: "I don't know what the goal is. And I don't know if there's something bigger behind it that is trying to destroy all of the institutions of the West or just women's sports. I don't see why anyone would go, would target women's sports specifically. But, you know, at some level, getting people, getting women to defend the destruction of women's sports is quite a feat. And you got a lot of those doing that now. So, you know, at one level, women's sports is not as important as almost anything else we could possibly be talking about. But having, just as having gotten women to turn on family members and tell them they couldn't come inside for Thanksgiving if they hadn't gotten their insane Covid shot is something that you can't ever undo. And these people are now going to tie themselves in knots trying to explain themselves to themselves and to others. Once you have defended the right to destroy a system that in the 1970s you would have been on the opposite side of, because you would have been pro Title IX at that point — is something that you can't undo. And it weakens individuals when you get them to argue for something indefensible. "

The DarkHorse Podcast

16,399 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen