Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨🇬🇧 “this is State Sponsored Child Abuse” “Their bone density stopped, growth hormones, potential brain damage, infertility” The UK government are forced to pause their planned experiment on giving children age 7 years old - puberty blockers following huge public backlash. They even offered to pay the children to... show more

Concerned Citizen

1,177,723 subscribers

19,120 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Under President Biden, the federal government promoted a grotesque social experiment on America’s children. ➡️ In just 3 years: • 7,000+ kids put on puberty blockers & hormones • 4,000+ subjected to mutilating surgeries This is state-sanctioned child abuse.

🚨 Under President Biden, the federal government promoted a grotesque social experiment on America’s children. ➡️ In just 3 years: • 7,000+ kids put on puberty blockers & hormones • 4,000+ subjected to mutilating surgeries This is state-sanctioned child abuse.

Center for American Liberty

31,731 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in the UK 15 Year Olds are not allowed to have Social Media because The Government say so. 5 Year Old Children are now permitted Puberty Blockers because The Government says so. It’s pure evil.

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in the UK 15 Year Olds are not allowed to have Social Media because The Government say so. 5 Year Old Children are now permitted Puberty Blockers because The Government says so. It’s pure evil.

Concerned Citizen

173,160 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Government have quietly announced that they will push ahead with their Puberty Blocker Trial. Children as young as 11 will be given drugs that can lead to loss of fertility and bone density. No child can consent to this. The trial must be stopped.

The Government have quietly announced that they will push ahead with their Puberty Blocker Trial. Children as young as 11 will be given drugs that can lead to loss of fertility and bone density. No child can consent to this. The trial must be stopped.

Claire Coutinho

158,881 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The puberty blocker drug trial on children is state sponsored child abuse. Wes Streeting , it must be stopped. Vulnerable children being exposed to powerful drugs with unknown long term consequences in the name of an ideology is just plain wrong. #StopTheTrial #stopthepbtrial #streetingtrial

The puberty blocker drug trial on children is state sponsored child abuse. Wes Streeting , it must be stopped. Vulnerable children being exposed to powerful drugs with unknown long term consequences in the name of an ideology is just plain wrong. #StopTheTrial #stopthepbtrial #streetingtrial

Sarah Pochin MP

19,216 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

There will be no lower age limit for the NHS puberty blocker trial, and even vulnerable children with anxiety and ADHD will not be exempt. This is clearly state-sponsored child abuse that will have negative, irreversible effects on our children, and it must be stopped.

There will be no lower age limit for the NHS puberty blocker trial, and even vulnerable children with anxiety and ADHD will not be exempt. This is clearly state-sponsored child abuse that will have negative, irreversible effects on our children, and it must be stopped.

Sarah Pochin MP

56,083 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

24,130 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨🇬🇧 GOVT-BACKED TRIAL ON PUBERTY BLOCKERS? "WHERE ARE THE MORALS?" Labour Councillor Stuart Fawcett just threw a red flag on a UK government-backed plan to run clinical trials testing puberty blockers on children, asking what a lot of people are thinking: “Where are the morals?” The proposed trial would give hormone-blocking drugs to minors to study the long-term effects which, spoiler alert, already include bone density loss, infertility, and putting girls into chemical menopause. We’re talking about experimenting on kids with drugs that alter their biology permanently… all while pretending this is compassionate healthcare. If you're running trials to find out if it's safe, maybe it shouldn't already be in use. And let’s be real: if this were any other drug with life-altering consequences, every ethics board in the country would be up in arms. But slap a “gender-affirming” label on it, and suddenly scrutiny becomes “hate.” “This is very frightening, it's dangerous, and the damage it can do is irreversible. These are children, you have different emotions, different feelings, different moods, and the hormones racing… it should be stopped Your frontal cortex of your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25, these are children.” Source: GB News

🚨🇬🇧 GOVT-BACKED TRIAL ON PUBERTY BLOCKERS? "WHERE ARE THE MORALS?" Labour Councillor Stuart Fawcett just threw a red flag on a UK government-backed plan to run clinical trials testing puberty blockers on children, asking what a lot of people are thinking: “Where are the morals?” The proposed trial would give hormone-blocking drugs to minors to study the long-term effects which, spoiler alert, already include bone density loss, infertility, and putting girls into chemical menopause. We’re talking about experimenting on kids with drugs that alter their biology permanently… all while pretending this is compassionate healthcare. If you're running trials to find out if it's safe, maybe it shouldn't already be in use. And let’s be real: if this were any other drug with life-altering consequences, every ethics board in the country would be up in arms. But slap a “gender-affirming” label on it, and suddenly scrutiny becomes “hate.” “This is very frightening, it's dangerous, and the damage it can do is irreversible. These are children, you have different emotions, different feelings, different moods, and the hormones racing… it should be stopped Your frontal cortex of your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25, these are children.” Source: GB News

Mario Nawfal

26,048 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The puberty blocker trial involving children is deeply concerning, and the Government should be ashamed of it. This is an issue I have campaigned against since becoming an MP. Today, I asked the Government whether children in care will at least be protected from what amounts to state-sponsored child abuse.

The puberty blocker trial involving children is deeply concerning, and the Government should be ashamed of it. This is an issue I have campaigned against since becoming an MP. Today, I asked the Government whether children in care will at least be protected from what amounts to state-sponsored child abuse.

Sarah Pochin MP

25,206 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨A puberty blocker trial can begin recruiting children after a failed attempt to stop the experiment in the High Court. Julia Hartley-Brewer: "Experimenting on children... This is Nazi warcamps territory." Philip Kiszely: "They have blood on their hands."

🚨A puberty blocker trial can begin recruiting children after a failed attempt to stop the experiment in the High Court. Julia Hartley-Brewer: "Experimenting on children... This is Nazi warcamps territory." Philip Kiszely: "They have blood on their hands."

Talk

11,639 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Notorious 10 years old children who reportedly bought and smoked Colorado (Kolos) in Sapele, Delta State, almost lost their lives. Kids are now also doing drugs? The adults who did this to these children, deserve to rot in jail. This is another level of child abuse.

Notorious 10 years old children who reportedly bought and smoked Colorado (Kolos) in Sapele, Delta State, almost lost their lives. Kids are now also doing drugs? The adults who did this to these children, deserve to rot in jail. This is another level of child abuse.

Aku N’esi Obi Ike (I)

100,470 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It’s the Vancouver Pride parade today, but check this out! Masculinity is alive and well! I’ve got young man after young man expressing their support for what I do. Children cannot consent to puberty blockers and we are going to stop this child abuse!

It’s the Vancouver Pride parade today, but check this out! Masculinity is alive and well! I’ve got young man after young man expressing their support for what I do. Children cannot consent to puberty blockers and we are going to stop this child abuse!

Billboard Chris 🌎

148,720 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THIS IS CHILD ABUSE ‼️ CHILDREN as young as 10 YEARS OLD can access PUBERTY BLOCKERS to become TRANSGENDER… “In the UNITED STATES, girls as young as 12 YEARS OLD have had DOUBLE MASTECTOMIES for GENDER not for CANCER” 💔💔💔 Billboard Chris 🌎 THIS MUST END. FULL EPISODE LINKED👇

THIS IS CHILD ABUSE ‼️ CHILDREN as young as 10 YEARS OLD can access PUBERTY BLOCKERS to become TRANSGENDER… “In the UNITED STATES, girls as young as 12 YEARS OLD have had DOUBLE MASTECTOMIES for GENDER not for CANCER” 💔💔💔 Billboard Chris 🌎 THIS MUST END. FULL EPISODE LINKED👇

Erin Molan

12,726 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

"No child put on puberty blockers at the earliest state of puberty, and whose natural puberty is permanently blocked, will ever have an orgasm or be fertile. No child can consent to that. Around 2,000 children have already been given puberty blockers for gender distress. So that is ample information available on impacts and outcomes held by gender clinics. It makes no sense to experiment on even more children whilst this exercise remains incomplete. Why isn't the Health Secretary prioritising the completion of this important data linkage study first before experimenting on more children?" Utterly superb speech from Rebecca Paul MP during the PATHWAYS puberty blocker debate in the House of Commons. Rebecca Paul MP is correct, the Health Secretary James Murray is incorrect.

"No child put on puberty blockers at the earliest state of puberty, and whose natural puberty is permanently blocked, will ever have an orgasm or be fertile. No child can consent to that. Around 2,000 children have already been given puberty blockers for gender distress. So that is ample information available on impacts and outcomes held by gender clinics. It makes no sense to experiment on even more children whilst this exercise remains incomplete. Why isn't the Health Secretary prioritising the completion of this important data linkage study first before experimenting on more children?" Utterly superb speech from Rebecca Paul MP during the PATHWAYS puberty blocker debate in the House of Commons. Rebecca Paul MP is correct, the Health Secretary James Murray is incorrect.

Genspect

72,034 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

No child is born in the wrong body. The puberty blockers trial is state-sanctioned child abuse. There are already too many young people who have been poorly advised and suffered irreversible harm due to gender ideology. A Reform UK government will hold every professional who has enabled this scandal to account.

No child is born in the wrong body. The puberty blockers trial is state-sanctioned child abuse. There are already too many young people who have been poorly advised and suffered irreversible harm due to gender ideology. A Reform UK government will hold every professional who has enabled this scandal to account.

Suella Braverman

133,019 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Despite agreeing with me that there is overwhelming public pressure to stop this trial, Wes Streeting is still determined to go ahead with what amounts to nothing short of state-sponsored child abuse. I will be writing to the Secretary of State, asking him to consider introducing statutory legislation to access data from 2,000 children and young people who were administered puberty blockers under the Tavistock scandal.

Despite agreeing with me that there is overwhelming public pressure to stop this trial, Wes Streeting is still determined to go ahead with what amounts to nothing short of state-sponsored child abuse. I will be writing to the Secretary of State, asking him to consider introducing statutory legislation to access data from 2,000 children and young people who were administered puberty blockers under the Tavistock scandal.

Sarah Pochin MP

38,782 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🇬🇧 15 YEAR OLDS BANNED FROM SOCIAL MEDIA, 11 YEAR OLDS NOW CLEARED FOR PUBERTY BLOCKERS 15 year olds are not allowed to have social media because the government says so. 11 year old children are now permitted puberty blockers under a new NHS trial because the government says so. The same state that decides a teenager isn't mature enough for Instagram has decided a child barely out of primary school is mature enough to consent to hormone altering drugs. This is pure evil and we must fight to ensure it is overturned.

🇬🇧 15 YEAR OLDS BANNED FROM SOCIAL MEDIA, 11 YEAR OLDS NOW CLEARED FOR PUBERTY BLOCKERS 15 year olds are not allowed to have social media because the government says so. 11 year old children are now permitted puberty blockers under a new NHS trial because the government says so. The same state that decides a teenager isn't mature enough for Instagram has decided a child barely out of primary school is mature enough to consent to hormone altering drugs. This is pure evil and we must fight to ensure it is overturned.

British Intel

25,254 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten