Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨🇬🇧 “this is State Sponsored Child Abuse” “Their bone density stopped, growth hormones, potential brain damage, infertility” The UK government are forced to pause their planned experiment on giving children age 7 years old - puberty blockers following huge public backlash. They even offered to pay the children to... show more

Concerned Citizen

1,177,723 subscribers

19,120 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Under President Biden, the federal government promoted a grotesque social experiment on America’s children. ➡️ In just 3 years: • 7,000+ kids put on puberty blockers & hormones • 4,000+ subjected to mutilating surgeries This is state-sanctioned child abuse.

🚨 Under President Biden, the federal government promoted a grotesque social experiment on America’s children. ➡️ In just 3 years: • 7,000+ kids put on puberty blockers & hormones • 4,000+ subjected to mutilating surgeries This is state-sanctioned child abuse.

Center for American Liberty

30,764 views • 10 months ago

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in the UK 15 Year Olds are not allowed to have Social Media because The Government say so. 5 Year Old Children are now permitted Puberty Blockers because The Government says so. It’s pure evil.

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in the UK 15 Year Olds are not allowed to have Social Media because The Government say so. 5 Year Old Children are now permitted Puberty Blockers because The Government says so. It’s pure evil.

Concerned Citizen

172,782 views • 12 days ago

The Government have quietly announced that they will push ahead with their Puberty Blocker Trial. Children as young as 11 will be given drugs that can lead to loss of fertility and bone density. No child can consent to this. The trial must be stopped.

The Government have quietly announced that they will push ahead with their Puberty Blocker Trial. Children as young as 11 will be given drugs that can lead to loss of fertility and bone density. No child can consent to this. The trial must be stopped.

Claire Coutinho

157,645 views • 15 days ago

After trans activists protested in front of the Los Angeles Children’s hospital for three weeks the Trans Clinic for Minors broke the executive order put in place to stop the administering of dangerous puberty blockers to minors and have now started up again! DISGUSTING CHILD ABUSE! Not sure how to get this reported to the government so they lose their federal funding to abuse children with puberty blockers and cross sex hormones but I am going to find out! These people are sick! Leave the kids alone you freaks! Also this trans activist is SKETCHY!! Help save the kids from this sick medical experiment. Puberty blockers destroy your body. Puberty is necessary for a healthy body. No such thing as the wrong puberty that is all part the the indoctrination to “ trans” 😱🥲 #transsexual #reels

Sensitive content

After trans activists protested in front of the Los Angeles Children’s hospital for three weeks the Trans Clinic for Minors broke the executive order put in place to stop the administering of dangerous puberty blockers to minors and have now started up again! DISGUSTING CHILD ABUSE! Not sure how to get this reported to the government so they lose their federal funding to abuse children with puberty blockers and cross sex hormones but I am going to find out! These people are sick! Leave the kids alone you freaks! Also this trans activist is SKETCHY!! Help save the kids from this sick medical experiment. Puberty blockers destroy your body. Puberty is necessary for a healthy body. No such thing as the wrong puberty that is all part the the indoctrination to “ trans” 😱🥲 #transsexual #reels

Buck Angel® Transsexual

20,221 views • 1 year ago

There will be no lower age limit for the NHS puberty blocker trial, and even vulnerable children with anxiety and ADHD will not be exempt. This is clearly state-sponsored child abuse that will have negative, irreversible effects on our children, and it must be stopped.

There will be no lower age limit for the NHS puberty blocker trial, and even vulnerable children with anxiety and ADHD will not be exempt. This is clearly state-sponsored child abuse that will have negative, irreversible effects on our children, and it must be stopped.

Sarah Pochin MP

56,083 views • 6 months ago

The puberty blocker drug trial on children is state sponsored child abuse. Wes Streeting , it must be stopped. Vulnerable children being exposed to powerful drugs with unknown long term consequences in the name of an ideology is just plain wrong. #StopTheTrial #stopthepbtrial #streetingtrial

The puberty blocker drug trial on children is state sponsored child abuse. Wes Streeting , it must be stopped. Vulnerable children being exposed to powerful drugs with unknown long term consequences in the name of an ideology is just plain wrong. #StopTheTrial #stopthepbtrial #streetingtrial

Sarah Pochin MP

19,216 views • 6 months ago

"Puberty blockers do NO damage to children" "They can be reversed" This is what they tell each other to justify what they are doing. 🔊 🚨🚨🚨

"Puberty blockers do NO damage to children" "They can be reversed" This is what they tell each other to justify what they are doing. 🔊 🚨🚨🚨

Wall Street Mav

1,404,678 views • 2 years ago

There are 2000 children that have already taken puberty blockers. Why is the Government not prioritising looking at the data/outcomes for these children? Instead it wants to experiment on 226 more children. Stop the #Streetingtrial #StopthePBTrial

There are 2000 children that have already taken puberty blockers. Why is the Government not prioritising looking at the data/outcomes for these children? Instead it wants to experiment on 226 more children. Stop the #Streetingtrial #StopthePBTrial

Rebecca Paul MP

48,218 views • 6 months ago

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

24,130 views • 7 months ago

A group of MPs are pushing to end the planned NHS trial to see the effects of puberty blockers on children. "2,000 children have taken puberty blockers over the last 15 years... we could learn a lot from them, they've already taken them." Alex Phillips | Rebecca Paul MP

A group of MPs are pushing to end the planned NHS trial to see the effects of puberty blockers on children. "2,000 children have taken puberty blockers over the last 15 years... we could learn a lot from them, they've already taken them." Alex Phillips | Rebecca Paul MP

Talk

14,997 views • 6 months ago

🚨🇬🇧 GOVT-BACKED TRIAL ON PUBERTY BLOCKERS? "WHERE ARE THE MORALS?" Labour Councillor Stuart Fawcett just threw a red flag on a UK government-backed plan to run clinical trials testing puberty blockers on children, asking what a lot of people are thinking: “Where are the morals?” The proposed trial would give hormone-blocking drugs to minors to study the long-term effects which, spoiler alert, already include bone density loss, infertility, and putting girls into chemical menopause. We’re talking about experimenting on kids with drugs that alter their biology permanently… all while pretending this is compassionate healthcare. If you're running trials to find out if it's safe, maybe it shouldn't already be in use. And let’s be real: if this were any other drug with life-altering consequences, every ethics board in the country would be up in arms. But slap a “gender-affirming” label on it, and suddenly scrutiny becomes “hate.” “This is very frightening, it's dangerous, and the damage it can do is irreversible. These are children, you have different emotions, different feelings, different moods, and the hormones racing… it should be stopped Your frontal cortex of your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25, these are children.” Source: GB News

🚨🇬🇧 GOVT-BACKED TRIAL ON PUBERTY BLOCKERS? "WHERE ARE THE MORALS?" Labour Councillor Stuart Fawcett just threw a red flag on a UK government-backed plan to run clinical trials testing puberty blockers on children, asking what a lot of people are thinking: “Where are the morals?” The proposed trial would give hormone-blocking drugs to minors to study the long-term effects which, spoiler alert, already include bone density loss, infertility, and putting girls into chemical menopause. We’re talking about experimenting on kids with drugs that alter their biology permanently… all while pretending this is compassionate healthcare. If you're running trials to find out if it's safe, maybe it shouldn't already be in use. And let’s be real: if this were any other drug with life-altering consequences, every ethics board in the country would be up in arms. But slap a “gender-affirming” label on it, and suddenly scrutiny becomes “hate.” “This is very frightening, it's dangerous, and the damage it can do is irreversible. These are children, you have different emotions, different feelings, different moods, and the hormones racing… it should be stopped Your frontal cortex of your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25, these are children.” Source: GB News

Mario Nawfal

26,048 views • 6 months ago

The puberty blocker trial involving children is deeply concerning, and the Government should be ashamed of it. This is an issue I have campaigned against since becoming an MP. Today, I asked the Government whether children in care will at least be protected from what amounts to state-sponsored child abuse.

The puberty blocker trial involving children is deeply concerning, and the Government should be ashamed of it. This is an issue I have campaigned against since becoming an MP. Today, I asked the Government whether children in care will at least be protected from what amounts to state-sponsored child abuse.

Sarah Pochin MP

24,879 views • 13 days ago

Notorious 10 years old children who reportedly bought and smoked Colorado (Kolos) in Sapele, Delta State, almost lost their lives. Kids are now also doing drugs? The adults who did this to these children, deserve to rot in jail. This is another level of child abuse.

Notorious 10 years old children who reportedly bought and smoked Colorado (Kolos) in Sapele, Delta State, almost lost their lives. Kids are now also doing drugs? The adults who did this to these children, deserve to rot in jail. This is another level of child abuse.

Aku N’esi Obi Ike (I)

100,470 views • 4 months ago

Puberty blockers put children on a medical pathway that leads to infertility and loss of sexual function. Can an 8-year-old child with autism really agree to that?

Puberty blockers put children on a medical pathway that leads to infertility and loss of sexual function. Can an 8-year-old child with autism really agree to that?

Claire Coutinho

30,407 views • 6 months ago

'There are concerns around damage to brain development, bone growth, sexual functioning.' James Esses discusses the concerns around the puberty blockers trial, and the mixed messaging from Wes Streeting. | Connie Shaw

'There are concerns around damage to brain development, bone growth, sexual functioning.' James Esses discusses the concerns around the puberty blockers trial, and the mixed messaging from Wes Streeting. | Connie Shaw

GB News

15,874 views • 4 months ago

Our Labour MP Amanda Hack voted for puberty blockers on children. This has to stop. No child is born in the wrong body.

Our Labour MP Amanda Hack voted for puberty blockers on children. This has to stop. No child is born in the wrong body.

Joseph Boam

11,874 views • 10 days ago

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 views • 4 months ago

Karin Selva, the medical director for the Randall Children's Hospital's Transgender Clinic in Oregon, promotes harmful puberty blockers for CHILDREN and claims that they are "reversible," despite ADMITTING there aren't any studies on long-term effects. PURE EVIL CHILD ABUSE

Karin Selva, the medical director for the Randall Children's Hospital's Transgender Clinic in Oregon, promotes harmful puberty blockers for CHILDREN and claims that they are "reversible," despite ADMITTING there aren't any studies on long-term effects. PURE EVIL CHILD ABUSE

Libs of TikTok

2,387,253 views • 10 months ago