Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is the most coherent explanation on why going “fully EV” makes no sense (for now). Get this man in charge of an energy committee.

2,217,658 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Compound248 💰's profile picture
Compound248 💰2 years ago

Good Lord, we must protect this man.

Brandon Beylo's profile picture
Brandon Beylo2 years ago

Based Canadian Logger.

The Limiting Factor's profile picture
The Limiting Factor2 years ago

🤦🏼‍♂️ I've already covered this in my videos. I already did a whole series on the semi and megacharging. He's right that it takes an enormous amount of power/energy but he doesn't seem to know the difference between those two things. Furthermore, he's not taking into account spare capacity in the grid and how that can be stored by batteries for times where the load peaks. What all that adds up to mean is that you don't need a new nuclear power plant or hydro dam, you just need a megapack at each charging site.

Andrey Perelman's profile picture
Andrey Perelman2 years ago

Just a second. A hydro dam with 1.1Gwatt capacity can produce 26.4 GWh per day it’s more than double than needed per his calculations, which seem to be very exaggerated as well. This quick math talk is impressive to people that are not familiar with this math, IMO.

Charles Steadman's profile picture
Charles Steadman2 years ago

So wrong it's laughable. His logging truck uses 2.5MWh of energy, sure, because it's 30% efficient ICE. And the Tesla Semi, being 90%+ efficient, does the job with a 900kWh pack. He has no idea with his dam reference what a MWh and a MW are. The Semi is already working...

Joseph Toomey's profile picture
Joseph Toomey2 years ago

He's mixing up gigawatts (power) and gigawatt-hours (energy). Anyone who doesn't understand the difference shouldn't be anywhere near an energy committee. Yet his tacit recognition of the impracticality of heavy duty EV trucks is correct.

Casual Observer's profile picture
Casual Observer2 years ago

I never understood the resistance to hybrids; seems like everyone is a complete purist who sees the issue in black and white.

Kim BENNI's profile picture
Kim BENNI2 years ago

The dude is confusing power (Megawatts) with energy (Megawatt-hours). 2.5 MW would be 3300 brake horsepower. No logging truck is anywhere near that. But he's kind of correct on the overall energy consumption as 2.5 MWh is give or take 420 brake horsepower during a 8 hours work day.

Julien Villa-Massone's profile picture
Julien Villa-Massone2 years ago

People rarely understand the difference between power (W) and energy (Wh). This is another example, leading to wrong conclusions.

MilMileBattery's profile picture
MilMileBattery2 years ago

Brother doesn’t even understand the difference between energy and power 🤡

Related Videos