Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is the ugliest moment of decentralization. When system rules come under attack, every protocol faces a brutal dilemma: 🔴 Intervene and get called centralized. 🔴 Don't intervene and watch a death spiral unfold. Jeff Yan refused $100M in VC money because he wouldn't let users come second. But...

19,137 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Ever since its airdrop in November, $HYPE has been on a tear 🔥. On Unchained, Arthur Hayes & Hans explain: 🚀 what actually fueled Hyperliquid’s rise 🪙 why the Wynn saga looks like a clever farm 📉 how Robinhood and Coinbase could be a real threat 🧠 and why HIP-3 is the DEX “holy grail” Timestamps: 🎬 0:00 Intro 🔥 3:25 Why Arthur says the future of perps is onchain—and what that changes 🚀 6:58 How Hyperliquid managed to climb the ranks without VCs 🧱 9:45 Whether being its own L1 gives Hyperliquid an edge 🔍 12:44 How Hanson adapts market making in a fully transparent environment 🕵️‍♂️ 16:40 Why Arthur doesn’t buy the James Wynn story 💸 20:56 Whether the types of traders on Hyperliquid are different than on other venues ⚔️ 22:14 How Hyperliquid could defend itself when Coinbase and Robinhood enter the arena 🔐 26:18 What Arthur and Hanson think about Jeff Yan’s post saying transparency benefits users 🐙 32:59 Did Binance and OKX try to sabotage Hyperliquid during the $JELLY event? 📊 38:24 Arthur answers his own question of whether Hyperliquid takes on Binance’s trading volume 🌘 42:20 Whether dark pool DEXes can fix transparency without killing decentralization 🔧 47:15 Why Hanson thinks the security FUD around Hyperliquid is overblown 🌏 50:20 Whether Asia’s crypto communities care less about decentralization 🧠 52:34 How Hyperliquid’s ecosystem play with HyperEVM could reshape its future 🏆 55:52 Why Arthur calls HIP-3 the “holy grail” for DEXes 🪙 1:00:01 Whether the HYPE buyback program is a good idea 📈 1:02:49 What Hyperliquid must get right as Coinbase and Robinhood show up Thank you to our sponsors! Xapo Bank Bitwise

Laura Shin

52,573 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BAANX AT ETHCC CANNES: THE FUTURE OF PAYMENTS TOOK CENTER STAGE While Cannes is famous for red carpets and film premieres, this year's ETHCC proved that the real blockbuster story was happening on the 4th floor of Palais des Festivals, where Baanx was rewriting the script for crypto payments. THE MAIN EVENT: SIMON JONES ON PAYMENTS EVOLUTION Chief Commercial Officer commanded the Main Stage with a simple but powerful message: "Why spending crypto should feel like spending cash." It wasn't just a presentation, it was a manifesto for the future of finance. Simon, an OG who's been bridging traditional finance and decentralized tech long before it was cool, didn't mince words about what's at stake. His specialty? Finding solutions that make crypto payments more accessible, secure, and impactful. And at ETHCC, he delivered exactly that vision. BUILDING BRANDS THAT USERS ACTUALLY OWN. When asked about "Building a Brand and Product in Web3," Simon dropped some serious knowledge: "Building brands in web3 is how you start to look at different concepts in the product that have been in existence and redefine how you can reach the global audience. Building a brand in web3 is truly about building a brand that people feel they have a level of ownership engagement." This wasn't corporate speak, this was someone who understands that Web3 isn't just about technology; it's about fundamentally changing the relationship between brands and users. emphasized that "web3 branding is how you build something that connects you to the users" and Baanx is living proof of this philosophy. THE MARKET LEADER PLAYBOOK Simon's formula for dominance was refreshingly straightforward: "You got to build a product that people like, in order to be a market leader." But he didn't stop there. He stressed the importance of building "a product that people interact with everyday" while staying true to brand values and helping users understand the real benefits. WHAT Baanx SHOWCASED: THE CRYPTO LIFE REVOLUTION The Baanx Investment team wasn't just talking theory, they were demonstrating real solutions. Their booth became a magnet for anyone curious about earning crypto just by swiping their Crypto Life Life Card. The value prop was clear: fast, transparent, and low-cost solutions for moving money globally, with just a few lines of code for integration. But here's what set them apart: true self-custody solutions. While others promise decentralization, Baanx delivers it, empowering users with full control over their digital assets without relying on third parties. THE ENTERPRISE GAME-CHANGER Simon Jone's track record speaks volumes. Under his leadership, Baanx has secured incredible enterprise partnerships with industry giants like MetaMask 🦊 and Ledger. These aren't just partnerships, they're validation that Baanx is solving real problems for real businesses. LOOKING FORWARD: THE FINTECH REVOLUTION As fintech companies play an increasingly important role in the global economy, Baanx positioned itself as the key driver of growth in the sector. Their platform is already helping well-known fintech brands expand their product offerings and reach new customers. THE CANNES TAKEAWAY What happened at #ETHCC Cannes wasn't just another crypto conference. It was a glimpse into a future where spending crypto feels as natural as spending cash, where brands build genuine ownership relationships with users, and where the bridge between traditional finance and Web3 isn't just a concept, it's a reality. Simon Jones and the $BXX team didn't just attend ETHCC; they owned it. And based on what they showcased, the future of payments is in very capable hands. The question isn't whether crypto payments will go mainstream, it's whether you'll be part of the revolution. 🔗

I F U R E

16,441 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🎙 The Sujal Show Ep. 11: Arthur Hayes “Why I’m Betting Big on Hyperliquid (Over Bitcoin)” The man behind BitMEX, Arthur Hayes, reveals why 90% of traders lose money, says decentralization is “mostly marketing,” why he’s all-in on Hyperliquid & Zcash, 3 altcoins, & gives his 2028 election thesis and how it will affect Bitcoin. We Discussed on The Sujal Show: - The 2017 moment BitMEX started printing real money - Why insider trading should be legal - Why 90% of traders lose money (90/10 rule of trading) - How to build wealth in crypto - His $150 price target for Hyperliquid by end of August - Why Hyperliquid could become the largest exchange in the world - His take on Gracy Chen's "Hyperliquid is centralized" claim - Narrative that will make stupid money - His portfolio revealed - The timeline for Bitcoin to hit $500k (gave a specific year) - Why Ethereum is still the best L1 - Zcash to $2,000–$3,000? & 10% Of Bitcoin His privacy thesis - 3 coins to outperform Bitcoin TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Intro 02:08 How to Get Rich in Crypto Without Gambling 03:30 Why 90% of Traders Lose Money 05:32 Will AI Replace 99% of Traders? 06:23 How Salaried People Should Build Wealth in Crypto 07:25 Arthur Hayes’ Current Portfolio 07:35 Is Ethereum Still a Long-Term Bet? 08:19 Zcash to $2,000–$3,000? 09:09 Can Quantum Computing Threaten Bitcoin & Zcash? 09:42 Hyperliquid Price Prediction 10:14 How Big Can Hyperliquid Become? 11:05 Is Hyperliquid Really Decentralized? 13:11 Is Bitcoin Truly Decentralized? 13:50 Has Bitcoin Bottomed Already? 14:47 Bitcoin Future Prediction 16:34 Should Insider Trading Be Legal? 17:37 Would Legal Insider Trading Make Markets More Manipulative? 19:25 The Sujal Show Prediction Round 23:59 Is Trump Good or Bad for Crypto? 25:22 Advice for the Younger Generation From Citibank fired to crypto billionaire. His trading psychology will good for to recover loss Watch now 👇

Sujal Jethwani

105,829 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Trump Assassination Attempt - Help Me Out with this one Plz A Review of Shots Fired — How Many were Hit on the First Shot? 🔴 VIDEO #1 • Shows a man in a white shirt appearing to take have taken a shot to the abdominal area and falls down. —— this occurs during the first shot ( 🔴 VIDEO #2 • Shows two people who appears to have been hit near the low and high abdominal area. —— the FIRST shot appears to have grazed or come extremely close to the man in the dark shirt as he immediately looks down and falls. Not 100% sure he was hit, but other videos confirm the bleacher next to him was hit. —— the SECOND shot definitely hits the man in the American flag shirt as he grabs his abdomen and falls. ( 🔴 VIDEO #3 • This is a wide-angled video showing their locations. Along with Competatore’s location. —— Comperatore is said to be hit in the second volley of shots, after the first three. —— for the sake of clarity, here is the full unedited wide-angled video. ( 🔴 VIDEO #4 • Video of Comperatore reportedly on the ground with what appears to be his family going hysterical. People point to their head, confirming shot. Reportedly hit in the volley of shots after the first 3. 🔴 VIDEO #5 • This model shows an accurate depiction of the line of sight between the shooter, Trump, and stands. ( The only thing that doesn’t make sense to me is the first shot… —— This model does not include the man in the white shirt from Video #1 and appears misaligned between the shooter, Trump, and video #2 victim. Talk about a magic bullet… Am I missing something?

MJTruthUltra

58,633 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

There is a well-known test for deciding whether a nation can become a state. When people come to me and ask, "Isn't it so unfair that the Palestinians don't have a state?" the first thing I tell them is they do have a state, it's called Jordan. That was broken off from the British Mandate of Palestine as a state from the Arabs in 1920 to create an Arab Palestinian state. The problem is that there's a four-part test that comes from the Montevideo Convention in 1933 that asks four simple questions to decide whether a nation is a legitimate state. 1. Do we have a defined population? 2. Do we have a defined borders? 3. Do we have one single effective government? 4. Do we have the capacity to conduct foreign relations? There is no dispute that Israel met all of those factors in 1948 when it was created, that it has met those four factors every single second of every day since 1948. By the way, interestingly, the supposed Palestinian state, which 140 some odd countries in the world have now recognized, fails at least two of those four factors. And there's really no dispute about that. It doesn't have defined borders. In fact, all of the European countries that recently recognized that state were unwilling in any of their press releases or subsequent statements to define what those borders are because they know that they don't know. And second, most importantly, it's not governed by one government, let alone an effective one. Hamas rules part of Gaza, Israel rules the other part. The Palestinian Authority rules some parts of the West Bank, Judea and Samaria, Israel rules other parts.

Roy K. Altman

49,639 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Vitalik Buterin on why consortium blockchains have mostly failed “The original vision of consortium blockchains — the idea that you have 5 banks or major companies that come together and create their own chain — has been mostly a failure. I think the reason why is it ends up inheriting most of the disadvantages of centralization and most of the disadvantages of decentralization at the same time.” “The first five banks join, and they all feel like ‘Yay, we’re building a system together. We can all be part of it.’ But then once bank #6 and bank #7 and bank #29 come in, they’re joining a system where there’s already an established power structure, established participants, and basically to them it still feels like they’re joining some kind of centralized thing that’s controlled by a cartel.” “You don’t actually gain the benefits of true openness that people are looking for. You don’t have Etherscan. You don’t have a connection to an open, public network. At the same time, if you build on one of those systems, you have to figure out how to program distributed systems; you lose privacy — you might think you still have some, but the reality is you’re putting your data on a network where the only people that get to see it are you and all your closest competitors. From a privacy perspective, it actually doesn’t make much sense.” “The compromise between centralization and decentralization that actually makes a lot more sense is: you have an application and today that application is a server. You can keep your server, but instead, we’re going to add scaffolding on top to give users extra security guarantees. You put Merkle roots on chain. You put proofs on chain. And you give your users assurance that whatever is happening inside of your system is actually following the rules. So you have high scale, high performance, and you optimize for a minimal delta for existing centralized infrastructure deployment. Keep your existing infrastructure the way it is, and you just add a side car that makes the roots and the proofs.” Source: Arbitrum

Etherealize

131,518 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce