This is what a solid legal submission sounds like.

Adv Sikhakhane is heavy this man reasons so welll and make solid watertight legal submissions give this man his roses

He knows how to explain n give more explanation n elaborate things

It's probative value is lighter, almost weak without corroboration.

The Sibiya affidavit is direct evidence of a person who was present, observed the distribution and received money. It is not hearsay and does not require corroboration to be admissible or to raise a genuine dispute of fact. Any shortcomings as to amount, timing or prior reporting go to weight and can be tested if the matter is referred to oral evidence. They do not render the affidavit of ‘almost no’ probative value on these papers.

So, I can just go to a podcast to report that Mbalula dished out money. When asked for proof, I just call a close friend of my to depose to an affidavit to repeat what I said🧐

Sibiya does not say “I heard NDZ say it.” He says he was a credentialed delegate, he was at the clinic, he saw Mbalula handing out cash, and he received some. That is personal knowledge. Calling him a “close friend who repeats what I said” is an inference you have not proved.

Nhe, Mkhuluwa, Sibiya is probably a local version of Hazim Mustafa...those guys who appear after the fact to accompany a non-existence😂

I haven't seen affidavit from Mustafa though 🤔

Although its contents were covered, the actual doc is with SARB, attached as an annexure to its Phala-phala report. I'm MPs can get it easier than us. Naye u Hazim says things he cant corroborate like how his 'dollars' came in.

What solid here? Simply saying we don't have tangible evidence but the court must give us an ear. You like being a drum majorette princess.

Why are you so invested in the internal struggles within the African National Congress (ANC)? Instead, concentrate on your MKP Tata Manyi, whose leadership and initiatives are more directly relevant to your interests.

tsk. after 4 yrs zuma cant be trusted like all the zumas @MKParliament

Just know Mma Nkosazana Zuma got the best lawyer there her case is safe with Adv Muzi skhakhane SC ❤️

2 Verbal statements? Is that all? Has there been any forensic financial evidence to track money to support such claims?

What exactly are you trying to say about SC Dali Mpofu…?

Its only solid in your eyes and ears Thangana

Affidavit is not proof but a statement made under oath, he is good defending a weak point. Probative value is very light.

True, only if it was about law and legal principles, it's all about who is involved against who.

So anyone can say mzwanele raped a child, get an affidavit from a place you were at and boom it’s fact?!

He is saying absolutely nothing, affidavit is not evidence.

The country is under attack and u are busy entertaining nonsense absolute rubbish

The question is where is the prove of payments?

Mzwa, I know you are comparing Adv Sikhakhane to someone. Caca bhokhwe.

Eintlek.....what is the similarities between NDZ & CR17? In a nutshell both were campaigning using money. There's no holy cows here. The end!

How is that you Jimmy?

Just imagine court operating on hearsays

Haibo Mzwanele...... He is grabbing at straws!

@SizweGina10 Legal eagle

You chose well in Rock Drilling Certificate, because there’s just nothing here, except jargon…

In the interest of the public, the plaintiff's legal representatives ought to conduct a formal fact-finding inquiry. Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma should disclose the identities of all financial beneficiaries so that appropriate subpoenas may be issued.

Nothing solid here.

Phezu kwakhe Mbalula...

Lol even if he's said crap you would say that

People with money and power wasting the courts time. Is this necessary? Couldn’t Mbalula just ignore Mama Zuma…💁🏽‍♀️ This buying votes allegations have been thrown around at so many people for a long time, it’s nothing new 🤦🏽‍♀️

This case is hard for Mr Sikhakhane SC. It's not easy to take an oral evidence as real-time factor if there is not evidence or substance. This calls for other relating evidence to substantiate the oral evidence. In the absence of relating evidence the oral evidence is futile.

Not the Dali Mpofu's submissions

Mpofu would be waffling about scrambled eggs at this stage

She musnt forget to fight the CR 17 also. It was one and the same campaign