This is what zero evidence looks like.

Material proof will always be insufficient to skeptics. •Christ entered history to transform human consciousness, not to leave forensic evidence •Any purely external proof (documents, archaeology) can always be doubted If Christ could be proven like a chemical formula, belief would not be free. ⸻ The three kinds of “proof” I. Historical–external proof historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth: •Tacitus •Josephus (with later interpolations acknowledged) •Roman records •Early Christian communities appearing suddenly and explosively ⸻ Inner-historical proof •The entire evolution of human consciousness changes sharply around the 1st century •A new inner faculty appears: moral individuality •Humans begin to experience conscience as an inner voice, not tribal law This is not gradual — it is a historical rupture. Something entered human evolution that had never been there before. •Greek philosophy ends in abstraction •Roman law hardens •Mystery wisdom dies And suddenly: •Love becomes a moral force •The value of the individual soul appears •Inner responsibility replaces outer law This inner change is the historical “footprint” of Christ. ⸻ Experiential proof (future-normal proof) Direct experience in higher consciousness Not visions, but: •A real encounter with the Christ Being in Imagination, Inspiration, and Intuition •Especially in the life review after death •And increasingly between death and rebirth •Every human being meets Christ after death •Recognition depends on moral development This proof cannot be borrowed — it must be lived. ⸻ Rejection of “miracles as proof” •Miracles convince only those who already believe •They belong to atavistic consciousness •Christ worked primarily in the moral world, not through spectacle The Resurrection is not a resuscitated body, but: •A transformation of the Earth’s etheric sphere •Making Christ perceptible non-physically ⸻ The Etheric Christ as modern proof From the 20th century onward, Christ becomes perceptible: •Not physically •But in etheric vision This perception: •Is sober, moral, wakeful •Happens to individuals across cultures •Does not found new religions This is the new form of evidence, suited to freedom. ⸻ Christianity does not rest on documents, but on an event in the evolution of the Earth. In other words: •Christ is proved by what humanity became afterward •Not by what was written about Him

Denying that Jesus existed puts someone outside serious historical discussion. It’s not bold. It’s not enlightened. It’s just ignoring evidence because the implications are uncomfortable.

He existed. He just wasn’t the son of a God or resurrected. Zero evidence.

The number of copies alone doesn't determine the reliability or superiority of evidence. Thats all the 25k claim is; an inflated, dogmatic apologetic claim The standards of historical evidence for Khan, Alexander and Caesar all far outweigh Jesus

to all you jesus doubter keep deny Jesus all you want every knee shall bow, every mouth confess he is lord

@elfgirl4040 You are ignorant if you think eye witness accounts written and oral testimony are not accurate. Biblical archaeology and scriptural evidence support the historical evidence of the testimonies being eyewitnesses to Jesus and resurrection and epistles.

I know that my Redeemer liveth

What is the argument here? You're saying that 25 thousand manuscripts exist?

Okay, sooo Daniel, this brings me to a the central question. Does your belief in Jesus and Christianity depend on the empirical and historical evidence for his life, death and resurrection or do believe in him by pure a prior logical deduction?

You act like it has to be one or the other, why not both plus others?

If the bible didn't exist would you still have your same beliefs?

It would depend, the Bible is a collection of eye witness accounts, are you saying there are no longer any eye witness accounts of Jesus?

There’s zero contemporaneous evidence of Jesus’ existence - this is highly concerning as contemporaneous evidence is to be highly expected. There is meaningful contemporaneous evidence of the other characters listed. The [x] of manuscripts of Jesus are basically copies …

This is beyond nonsensical. We have 10 complete books that Julius Caesar authored *himself*, Genghis Khan's genetics are present in about 8% of the former Mongol Empire, and Alexandrias didn't pop up all over the place because he didn't exist. Jesus' 1st mention was 100yrs late.

Cool, can you show me one record from the time jesus was alive?

This is so stupid. To explain why, Alexander the Great is mentioned in the records of other civilizations, not to mention contemporary coins with his likeness. The earliest manuscript of your Jesus fellow comes from over a century after his time

We have tons of evidence that Julius Cesar, etc existed, based on their own writings, and thousands of testimonies from people who lived with them (people who can be named). There's no direct evidence for the existence of Jesus. But ZERO of the myths in the bible. ZERO.

This guy will literally never admit his talking points have been refuted/debunked a thousand times, no matter how many times he reposts them. I'm coming around to think this is just an engagement bait account.

A lot of manuscripts prove the existence of Harry Potter and Frodo Baggins too. Same logic.

We have actual books published by Julius Caesar which were reviewed by contemporaries.

We don't believe that Genghis Khan, Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great were gods.

Jesus Mythicism makes us atheists look as retarded as Young Earthism makes theists look. Some bloke got executed, but didn't do a post-mortem walkabout. So what?

There is like at most 6 (in letters: six!) non-scriptural manuscripts for the existence of Jesus and they all fit on one A4 page when printed. That’s all for ”existence”. For “resurrection”: 0 “This is what zero evidence looks like” lol

Amen!

We have Genghis’ DNA and known descendants We have multiple accounts from Greek, Persian, Egyptian, and Indian sources for Alexander We have the writings of Caesar and accounts from other people besides Romans

It’s funny how Christians want to believe in a man who died and came back to life but refuse to believe in actual historical figures who did exist XD

The evidence for Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar--the actual evidence, that is, not the fairy-tale being peddled in the video--would blot out the sun. There is no good evidence--none whatsoever--for Jesus.

???? I think Jesus existed 100% but this is misleading. Gospel of Mark is the first mention of Jesus and it was written ~40 years after he died.

everyone knows jesus existed as a historical figure but that doesn't mean he was the son of a god lmfao

It's really unfortunate how men disproves the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ of which is pivotal to their eternal destiny. It could only be of the devil's works.

Dear morons Nobody doubts Genghis Khan, Alexander or Jesus existed What we doubt are the divinity claims. Jesus was not the son of God/God in the same way Alexander was not the son of Zeus

Bro no one doubts that jesus existed. The point is: Did he show superpowers,thus proving to be the son of a magical,divine being?

Why are you making shit up?

With the standards of evidence you display, you might as well believe in big foot and leprechauns.

Evidence of what? Yes there was a guy called Jesus, he preached, he had followers and he was crucified. That's all you can prove from the evidence.

The only source is Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews. But it was doctored for anyone else

Why are you using "pagan" technology and music to promote your crap? Go live in a cave and wait for the son of the baby butchering and genocidal god 🤦🏻‍♂️