Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 THIS IS WHERE IT GETS STRANGE: HE DOESN’T KNOW NANCY GUTHRIE - SO WHY DOES THE SHERIFF LOOK PERSONALLY SHATTERED? WATCH HIM CLOSELY. During the kidnapping investigation of Savannah Guthrie's mother, the Pima County Sheriff has been visibly emotional in multiple press conferences and interviews. Not the family....

396,273 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Nancy Guthrie If you are following this story, you may want to watch the whole "Savannah goes Home" segment. (Linked below) With her family ruled out as suspects, who is in? I believe someone from Tuscon who crossed paths with Savannah is likely. I believe BAU has drawn up a profile of the abductor and is fasioning words to appeal to him based on the abductor's profile. Is it someone angry, like Bryan Kohberger was angry but not angry because he was a sadistic Loser, serial killer in making, but rather is Porch Guy angry because he feels slighted and wants Savannah to pay. Is this why Savannah is doing the pleas solo? Because they believe she is the target? This abduction never was about ransom money. With the family ruled out, we know the motive was not life insurance/ inheritance. We are down to the motive being far more twisted. We know about the "Talk to her and you will see" reference. What about, "It's never too late. You are not lost or alone." Does BAU believe this is a loner and a messed up type of individual, deeply unhappy with who he is and deeply jealous of Savannah? Someone capable of extreme violence, but hurting inside? I think we will be shocked at what we will come to know. What happened in that house between Porch Guy and Nancy for up to 41 minutes? Was the DNA found inside blood, hair, semen, sweat or touch? The motive of the ransom notes seems to be torturing Savannah as does the motive in the abduction. Could they be connected in this way?

Jennifer Coffindaffer

191,101 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Nancy Guthrie- 3 Points 1-The time that Annie and Tommaso arrived was at 11:56 a.m. You know how I know? It is so precise. This chart was presented on day 4. It is derived from forensic analysis conducted by investigators over 3 days of "hundreds of officers" working the case. This is exactly the preciseness you would see when the source is digital analysis. This looks just like the chart I would have preliminary prepared based on known data. What Sheriff Nanos said about the time being about 11 a.m. was merely guess-work. He was wrong. The chart is right. Annie and Tommaso looked around and knew quickly that there was a serious issue and called 911 and then called hospitals as they waited on police to arrive. It didn't take any time at all to see there was foul play. I believe the chart. I believe Nanos was guestimating. He even says that. 2-The photo below shows irrefutable evidence of expiration, IMV. (Not aspiration;) See the little droplets in this photo? It gives a better picture of the mist. 3-There is a critical piece of footage from 2/1 where Sheriff Nanos spoke to reporters. Have you seen it? Nanos made multiple key statements about search and rescue efforts to find Nancy, but in the next breath said he had concerns about foul play. Hmmm- *2 doors open *Blood on the porch *Nest camera pulled from the doorway *Nancy was in poor health (his words) There was no way to see this as a search and rescue mission, but he apparently did. Is that why Sheriff Nanos pulled the footage? #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieKidnapping

Jennifer Coffindaffer

35,424 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The reason that this extra diverse doctor lawyer equal does not respond as normal to simple explanations has to do with theory of mind. The police officer explains six times that she caused an accident and now has to provide her insurance. The diverse equal knows that she caused the accident. She remembers it from mere moments ago. However, the police officer was not there during the accident. She did not see him there. Therefore, according to diversity mathematics, the police officer could not possibly know that there was an accident at all. How could he? He did not see it. Or rather, she did not see him seeing it. "If I did not see the police officer looking at me as I caused an accident, then he does not know that I caused an accident. I know this because I am unable to know anything that I did not personally witness, and so that is how everybody's mind works." In the vibrant mind of the diversity, everything that does not happen in front of a person's eyes is a confusing mess that is impossible to understand. There simply is no way to ascertain that something happened if you did not see it before your eyes. That is why this extra diverse value contributor believes that the police officer is similarly confused. "It should be easy to get away with lying about this accident," she calculated, diversely. "He ain't see nothin.'" That is why, when he insists that the accident did in fact occur, she has no choice but to perceive this as racism. How could it not be? Every other diverse equal that she has ever lied to in a similar fashion has been easily confused, and let her go after committing similar crimes. So in the mind of the diversity, "black people always let me go when I lie, but white people never do, so white people must just be evil racists." We are truly enriched by the genius of these builders of civilization

hoe_math = PsychoMath

232,770 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce