正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Shermichael Singleton forces the CNN panel to adress the Democrat elephant in the room with their support of Graham Platner. He pointed out their TOTAL hypocrisy of attacking President Trump’s character while propping up a guy with such serious moral issues. SINGLETON: “I think Democrats have ceded whatever moral...

111,016 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton

Overton

136,508 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is why Shermichael Singleton Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines. Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars": "I find that a bit ironic. For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation. They were standing up for justice. They were upholding morality that they said Trump was an affront to. And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade. You have this guy who's saying he's going to make a speech to make a con- or draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins. He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh. Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who's now the defender of women? So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it's convenient for them. But now that there's a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could [un]seat Susan Collins, you know what? It doesn't necessarily matter, the ten-plus years of arguments we've made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who empower Trump, because we can win a seat. It's very Machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars. And I think as we get into the general election, you're going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the NRSC, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are. Look at who they're supporting the guy with the Nazi tattoo.

Nicholas Fondacaro

53,787 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tucker Carlson is—to put it bluntly—transing himself into a leftist. Tucker announced that he is leaving the Republican Party. "I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support, how could I or any American voters support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. Like, that's, that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that." Here's the point that needs to be made about that statement by Tucker Carlson. He said he would not support the Republican Party, nor is he going to support the Democrat Party and that's where I would challenge everyone to pause our thinking for a moment. If you refuse to vote for the Republican candidate, then you are, in effect, joining the Democrats. This is not some abstention that gives you moral high ground, because you don't 100% agree with the Republicans, or 100% agree with the Democrats, so you can't in good conscience, cast your vote because it might feel like an implicit endorsement of things that you don't agree with. No, no, no. If you do not vote for a Republican, you are, in effect, giving your opponent, the Democrats, a vote. Surrendering your vote gives your opponent an increased chance of winning because we are in a binary system. Either their values will prevail, or our values will prevail. So, if you refuse to vote for a Republican because you have even a significant policy disagreement with that politician, then you are effectively voting for racism against white people because that's what the Democrats stand for—wokeness, DEI, and ESG. I have never met a politician, read about a politician, or studied a politician with whom I agree 100% of the time. Disagreeing with a president on one policy is not a reason to blow up the rest of our agenda and, effectively, join the enemy—even if you claim you're not joining the enemy. Again, you don't have to agree with a politician on every policy in order to cast your vote for him, support him, or to be part of this general political party apparatus through which he is able to challenge the communists and anti-American zealots who are trying to take us down. So, I'm sorry to see Tucker leave the Republican Party. That makes me sad.

Liz Wheeler

83,425 次观看 • 1 个月前

Shermichael Singleton absolutely schools the CNN panel on birthright citizenship. He drops the receipts showing that Democrats once agreed it was a loophole Congress needed to shut down. SINGLETON: “Philosophically, I fundamentally disagree with the court on this. To me, I go back to subject to the jurisdiction of, going back to the original intent of the 1866 Civil Rights Act forward the 14th Amendment being passed.” “What was it to address? What was it to codify?” “It was freed slaves who did not have citizenship. It wasn’t freed slaves and any and everybody else across the globe.” “Of the 27 EU countries, NONE of them, none of the civilized Western countries allow or permit unconditional immigration. None of the Western countries allow it. With the exception of the United States and Canada.” “Now, that is not to say that we should not have an immigration policy where we welcome people. I think we absolutely should. It’s made our country very strong.” “But does it mean we should allow anyone to just come into the country, merely have a child and that child be granted citizenship? I would say not.” “And in fact, Democrats actually believed the same thing.” “You go back to 1993 when Harry Reid introduced Immigration Stabilization Act. His argument at the time was, you’re allowing people to take advantage of our country.” “Senator Dianne Feinstein agreed at the time. Several other Democrats agreed at the time.” “So once upon a time, there was bipartisan support that this is a problem that should be addressed by Congress.” “Now, I would agree that the that the executive branch should not have carte Blanche authority to just do whatever he or she will...I would agree there.” “But Congress needs to act on this by passing an amendment, again, I disagree with the interpretation by the court.” Shermichael Singleton

Overton

39,297 次观看 • 1 个月前

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton on ABC suspending Jimmy Kimmel indefinitely: “Well, first of all, I thought Kimmel’s comments were — were just stupid. I mean, obviously, based on the evidence that we have heard thus far from the investigators and prosecutors who’s currently in charge of the case is certainly appears — And I want to use the word appears — that this guy was certainly someone who had an ideology that I would argue if you were looking at a political spectrum is on the left of that political spectrum versus being on the right. Number one, that said, I think Disney is looking at their bottom line. I mean, Disney has faced several tough cycles where they have had some serious financial issues. And when you have Nexstar and Sinclair, those two entities combined cover 80 percent of the local television market in this country. If those two conglomerates are saying we’re not going to carry this show because it’s not in sync with our values as corporations or we’ve heard some anger from some of our individuals who watch in our various stations or, as Bill stated, you have business before the federal government that you would like to — to move forward. And by the way, those companies have a fiduciary responsibility to grow and expand those companies for their investors, and they’re canceling that. ABC had no choice but to say, you know what? If we don’t cancel this, then you run the risk of conservatives saying, we’re canceling Disney+. We’re not going to DisneyWorld or Disneyland. We’re going to no longer purchase anything that fits under the Disney umbrella. That becomes a very serious question, if you’re Bob Iger, running this company that has had serious financial issues for at least eight — six or eight quarters now. That’s the last thing you want. You’re going to go ahead and say, you know what? This isn’t worth it for us from a company’s perspective. Cancel it. And we just keep moving forward.”

Curtis Houck

675,975 次观看 • 10 个月前